- Open access
- Published: 30 July 2021
![](http://nandemo.space/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Impact of tobacco and/or nicotine products on health and functioning: a scoping review and findings from the preparatory phase of the development of a new self-report measure
- Esther F. Afolalu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8866-4765 1 ,
- Erica Spies 1 ,
- Agnes Bacso 1 ,
- Emilie Clerc 1 ,
- Linda Abetz-Webb 2 ,
- Sophie Gallot 1 &
- Christelle Chrea 1
Harm Reduction Journal volume 18 , Article number: 79 ( 2021 ) Cite this article
16k Accesses
4 Citations
11 Altmetric
Metrics details
Measuring self-reported experience of health and functioning is important for understanding the changes in the health status of individuals switching from cigarettes to less harmful tobacco and/or nicotine products (TNP) or reduced-risk products (RRP) and for supporting tobacco harm reduction strategies.
This paper presents insights from three research activities from the preparatory phase of the development of a new self-report health and functioning measure. A scoping literature review was conducted to identify the positive and negative impact of TNP use on health and functioning. Focus groups ( n = 29) on risk perception and individual interviews ( n = 40) on perceived dependence in people who use TNPs were reanalyzed in the context of health and functioning, and expert opinion was gathered from five key opinion leaders and five technical consultants.
Triangulating the findings of the review of 97 articles, qualitative input from people who use TNPs, and expert feedback helped generate a preliminary conceptual framework including health and functioning and conceptually-related domains impacted by TNP use. Domains related to the future health and functioning measurement model include physical health signs and symptoms, general physical appearance, functioning (physical, sexual, cognitive, emotional, and social), and general health perceptions.
Conclusions
This preliminary conceptual framework can inform future research on development and validation of new measures for assessment of overall health and functioning impact of TNPs from the consumers’ perspective.
As a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality worldwide, smoking remains a major public health problem. Compared with those who do not smoke, people who smoke are significantly more likely to develop heart diseases, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and other diseases [ 1 , 2 ]. It is well established that the best way to avoid the health risks associated with smoking is for people to never start and for those who smoke to quit [ 1 , 3 ]. Tobacco harm reduction is one way to alleviate the health risk for individuals who choose not to quit smoking [ 4 ], by providing less harmful tobacco and/or nicotine products (TNP), such as reduced-risk products (RRP) (used here to refer to products that present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present, less risk of harm to people who smoke and switch to these products versus continued smoking) or modified risk tobacco products (MRTP).
Several smokeless tobacco products and a heated tobacco product were recently authorized for marketing with modified risk claims through the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) MRTP pathway [ 5 ]. The guidance on MRTP applications [ 6 ] specifies that health outcomes should be assessed during premarket evaluation and postmarket surveillance of modified risk TNPs such as these. These health outcomes comprise not only objective clinical and biological measures but also self-reported outcomes [ 6 , 7 ]. Studies and reports have recently started providing evidence on the health impact of new TNPs [ 8 ]. For instance, recent papers have investigated the effects of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products on cardiopulmonary outcomes [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. However, the papers have mainly focused on clinical measurements, such as spirometry and other lung function tests; consumer perception is rarely explored or the focus of the research. Measuring self-reported experience is important for understanding the changes in the health status of individuals switching from cigarettes to RRPs and is a key component of tobacco harm reduction strategies [ 7 ]. Self-reported ratings of RRP effectiveness or adverse events might differ from clinical measures and provide another perspective as useful as the clinicians. In addition, consumer perception of positive changes in health status, functioning and other behavioral outcomes will also subsequently influence use behaviors and switching to RRPs rather than continuing smoking.
Self-perceived health status is a complex concept to define and measure, particularly within the context of TNP use [ 15 ]. While generic health status measures, such as the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), have been used to evaluate the health status of people who smoke [ 16 , 17 ], comparisons have mainly been made between those who currently smoke, those who used to smoke, and those who never smoked [ 18 , 19 ]. Results from these studies strongly suggest that, in healthy populations, existing generic measures are not sensitive enough to detect change over time when stopping or switching from cigarettes to other TNPs, owing to high ceiling effects [ 20 ]. While a few smoking-specific quality of life measures have been developed, these measures have not been widely implemented or standardized [ 15 , 17 , 21 , 22 ], and the application of these smoking-specific measures to different TNP use across the risk continuum is scarce [ 20 ].
As part of the A ssessment of B ehavioral OU tcomes related to T obacco and Nicotine Products (ABOUT™) Toolbox initiative [ 23 ], the present project aims at developing a new self-report measure (ABOUT™— Health and Functioning ) to address the current gap and assess the impact of TNPs on health and functioning (including health status, functional status and other health-related quality of life constructs). This paper presents insights from three research activities [ 24 , 25 ] from the preparatory phase of development of the measure—that is, a scoping literature review, reanalysis of consumer focus groups/interviews, and expert opinion. These three activities serve as background research to support the development of a preliminary conceptual framework of health and functioning associated with the use of TNPs.
Scoping literature review
The purpose of the review was to address two main questions among individuals who use TNPs:
What are the positive and negative health and functioning impacts of TNP use?
What concepts are evaluated by measures used to assess the positive and negative impacts of TNP use?
Given the nature and breadth of the research questions and the number of potentially relevant publications, a scoping literature review was used as it provides a means of identifying the literature and mapping the concepts and evidence on a topic by using an informative and iterative research process [ 26 ]. The scoping review involved a PubMed search (August 2018) and application of Sciome’s rapid Evidence Mapping (rEM) [ 27 ], followed by additional manual screening and review. rEM is a proprietary methodology developed by Sciome ( https://www.sciome.com/ ) to rapidly summarize and produce a quantitative representation of the available body of scientific evidence in a particular area. The study by Lam et al. demonstrated a proof-of-concept application of the rEM methodology [ 27 ]. The PubMed search terms targeted qualitative and quantitative research among people who use TNPs (Table 1 ). This was supplemented by a second, parallel step of manually identifying relevant literature through other known sources. Table 2 describes the general inclusion and exclusion criteria that were applied to the scoping literature review.
After the initial rEM exercise, two reviewers (EC, SG) further manually screened the titles and abstracts of the articles identified through the automated rEM exercise against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, the selected publications underwent a full screening by two reviewers (VL and DF) for determining their relevance to the research questions for data extraction and one of the co-authors (LA-W) cross-checked the screening and resolved differences in opinion among the reviewers.
The World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [ 28 ] framework and the revised Wilson and Cleary [ 29 , 30 ] model were used as a guide to broadly inform categories for data extraction from the literature on TNP use and health and functioning. These established models enable the conceptualization and description of health status and functioning (the combination of which is often referred to as health-related quality of life) [ 31 , 32 ], and related outcomes and determinants. To complement and refine this and to ensure relevance to those who use TNPs, the data extracted from the literature was also grouped and labeled based on the contents of the literature reviewed.
The elements extracted from the selected papers were as follows:
Author, citation details, and publication type
Objectives and/or research questions
Sample type, size, and principle demographics
Type(s) of TNP and definitions of levels of consumption
Methodology, questionnaires, and statistical methods used
Main results
Results grouped in broad categories: Health Signs and Symptoms; General Health Perceptions; Quality of Life, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Functional Status; Individual Characteristics; Environmental and Social Characteristics; Biomarkers and Biological Endpoints.
Reanalysis of focus groups/in-depth interviews
The objective of the secondary analyses of existing qualitative data in people who use TNPs was to inform the drafting of the initial conceptual framework, as well as interview guides for planned concept elicitation qualitative studies to identify concepts and develop items to detect what is relevant to measure in this context. Two sets of qualitative data containing information related to health and functioning were reanalyzed and participants had consented for their data to be used in future studies. The first was from 29 focus groups (total number of participants n = 229) that were originally designed to discuss perceived risk, appeal, and intent to use TNPs [ 33 , 34 ]. The focus groups—stratified by smoking status—were conducted in the United States (US; n = 12), Japan ( n = 4), Italy ( n = 4), and the United Kingdom (UK; n = 9) between December 2012 and August 2013. The second dataset included 40 in-depth interviews conducted in North Carolina, USA, with people who use TNPs, to discuss issues centered on perceived dependence on TNPs [ 35 ]. While 21 interviewees were people who were poly-TNPs users, 19 were people who were exclusive users of one of the following types of TNPs: cigarettes ( n = 5), smokeless tobacco ( n = 5), e-cigarettes ( n = 5), or another type of TNP (pipes, waterpipes, or nicotine replacement therapy [NRT] products; n = 4). These interviews were conducted in August 2017. The demographics of both data sets are presented in Table 3 . For reanalyzing the data, an initial codebook guided by the literature review data extraction categories was developed; however, new codes were created to complement these categories based on the thematic content analysis of the transcripts. The qualitative analysis software Quirkos [ 36 ] was used for the reanalysis.
Expert panel review
An expert panel consisting of five key opinion leaders (KOL) and five technical consultants was convened in August 28, 2018, in Neuchâtel, Switzerland. The KOLs were subject matter experts in the fields of nicotine and smoking cessation ( n = 1), Patients Reported Outcomes (PRO) evaluation and scale development ( n = 3), and health economics ( n = 1). The consultants were experts on nicotine dependence ( n = 1), psychometric validation ( n = 2), market research ( n = 1), and PRO development and validation ( n = 1). The meeting followed an agenda and semi-structured discussion guide to facilitate conversations. First, the panel was presented with the principles underlying the tobacco harm reduction assessment strategy [ 4 ]. This session was followed by an open elicitation phase, during which two experienced moderators asked the panel to identify and discuss concepts related to health and functioning in people who use TNPs that different stakeholders might find important. Then, the panel was asked to review and respond to the concepts identified in the literature review and in the qualitative research reanalysis. These findings were discussed in depth to arrive at a consolidated preliminary conceptual framework. Each concept was presented, and the experts were asked to rank and agree on concepts to be included and how the concepts should be grouped by domains in the framework. In generating the framework, the project team and expert panel considered the themes and concepts identified under each of the categories from the scoping literature review, specific concepts from the secondary analyses of the qualitative data, and the expert panel meeting. The authors then synthesized and re-organized concepts emerging from the different preparatory phase activities under main health and functioning and conceptually-related domains. The participants also provided their input on the best strategies for planned qualitative studies to inform and support the development and validity of the proposed health and functioning measure.
The literature search identified 4761 articles. Figure 1 (flow diagram) depicts the results of the search and screening process. Titles and abstracts were screened by the rEM exercise until the machine learning algorithms predicted 97.7% relevant references; thus, 707 abstracts were not screened. After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria to the remaining 4,054 abstracts, 281 were identified as part of the rEM exercise. After additional manual screening and review of the abstracts and articles against the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 90 full-text articles were included for data extraction [ 20 , 37 – 125 ]. Seven additional full-text articles were also included on the basis of a manual search [ 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 ]. Findings are summarized in Table 4 and a detailed description and data extracted from all the articles from the literature review is presented in Additional File 1 .
![tobacco topics research paper figure 1](https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12954-021-00526-z/MediaObjects/12954_2021_526_Fig1_HTML.png)
Flow diagram Sciome’s rapid Evidence Mapping (rEM) and manual screening processes of the scoping literature review
Fifty-six publications (56/97; 58%) presented data related to health signs and symptoms . These are grouped under five core areas: mental health and cognitive functioning (28/97; 29%); pain and physical trauma (6/97; 6%); respiratory, cardiovascular and inflammatory conditions (5/97; 5%); “other” health conditions , which included insomnia, liver disease, eye health, and hearing loss (5/97; 5%); and oral health (4/97; 4%). There were also eight publications related to the effects of smoking cessation on health signs and symptoms, mostly benefits of cessation but also including perceived dependence, addiction, and withdrawal symptoms (8/97; 8%). Overall, the burden and impact of cigarette smoking on both physical and mental health symptoms was negative and generally worse among people who smoke relative to those who do not smoke. On the other hand, quitting smoking was accompanied by improvements in general physical health and psychological wellbeing. However, in spite of the positive impact of quitting smoking, loss of moments of pleasure, struggle to manage stress, the social aspects of smoking, and withdrawal symptoms were seen as barriers to quitting.
The general health perceptions of various adults who use TNPs were reported in 18 of the 97 articles (18%), with 9 of them detailing the general health perceptions related to cigarettes and 9 being related to e-cigarettes and other TNPs. Perceptions were determined by questionnaires and focus groups for evaluating the health impacts, fear of diseases, harm to others and self, social impacts (both positive [e.g., inclusion and looking “cool”] and negative [e.g., stigma and exclusion]), and other reasons for taking up or considering/attempting smoking cessation.
Quality of life, health-related quality of life, and functional status was studied in 9 of the 97 included articles (9%). These studies mostly demonstrated with generic and specific QoL, HRQoL, or functional status questionnaires that cigarette smoking was associated with a worse quality of life and that smoking cessation often resulted in an improved quality of life. However, in some cases, the use of TNPs also reportedly enabled individuals to manage their levels of anxiety and improve some aspects of social engagement and functional status.
Individual, environmental and social characteristics were found to influence the decision to smoke and/or consider or attempt to quit smoking or switching to other TNPs, as reported in 8 (8%) and 11 (11%) of 97 publications, respectively. Some key characteristics and determinants of smoking behavior included low socioeconomic status, male sex, living alone, family, and close social environment, societal stigma, and local regulations.
Finally, 12 of the 97 publications (12%) were related to studies on biomarkers and biological endpoints in people who use TNPs and showed that smoking cigarettes negatively influenced cardiovascular, respiratory, oral, renal, stress, metabolic, and inflammatory-related biomarkers and physiological assessments.
The themes from this reanalysis are summarized below and organized on the basis of the narrative of the participants of their experiences.
Perceived negative impact of smoking
Other than health, the biggest and most salient reported negative impact of smoking was the perceived lack of control related to addiction and emotional health and wellbeing. Participants reported feeling that cigarette smoking was running their lives or “holding them hostage.” They reported that this perceived lack of a sense of control or willpower often led to feelings of weakness or a feeling that they were a “slave” to cigarettes. Many respondents reported smoking even when they did not necessarily want to and experiencing feelings of obsession and craving.
Perceived lack of control and addiction were also related to the activities of the participants throughout the day. People who smoke often reported altering their activities to smoke because of patterns of behavior or routine and the experienced need for a smoke. They reported that the “need for a smoke” sensation would cause them to leave work or social events early, not attend events if smoking was not allowed, interrupt what they were doing to smoke, and get up in the middle of the night.
Fear of withdrawal symptoms, with a strong emphasis on mental/emotional health, was also prominent among reported negative impacts of smoking. This fear was often reported as limiting the willingness of individuals to try to quit smoking or facilitating a return to prior smoking behavior. Individuals reported fearing the following symptoms they associated with withdrawal: mood swings and irritability, violent or aggressive behavior, inability to concentrate, anxiety, anger, and weight gain.
Perceived benefits of smoking
Several perceived benefits were identified that keep individuals smoking or using cigarettes. These included perceptions of enhanced cognitive functioning, relaxation, a way to take a break, use as a coping strategy, a social function, a weight management tool, the perception that it feels good, and being part of one’s identity. It is also important to note that the perceived benefits of smoking often outweighed the risks and the feeling of lack of control in the participant discussions. Even people who used to smoke noted they missed the relaxation and breaks they associated with smoking.
Recognition of symptoms/diseases related to smoking
Table 5 summarizes the negative symptoms and diseases related to smoking recognized by participants in both the focus groups and interviews. These were mostly related to six main body systems (cardiovascular, digestive, oral, neurological, reproductive, and respiratory).
Impacts on physical functioning
The participants noted how smoking impacts their physical functioning. In particular, they noted how their exercise capacity during running, playing sports, walking upstairs, and general physical activity was diminished. They also reported reduced stamina and endurance, decreased physical strength, and feeling tired more easily.
Effects on emotional health
The participants also described how smoking impacts their emotional health and wellbeing. People who smoke reported feelings of shame, guilt, weakness, and a lack of control or powerlessness. They also reported feelings of depression and anxiety associated with worry about health risks. Furthermore, the participants indicated that they experienced a fear of going to places where they could not smoke, being a bad role model for their children, and (in case of people who used to smoke) going back to smoking.
Positive and negative social impacts
Smoking was perceived to have both negative and positive impacts on the social lives of participants. Smoking impacted life negatively when it was not allowed in certain environments, such as in homes, at work, and in cars and airplanes. Stigma was also associated with smoking in an environment where peers and family members do not smoke, but it was also seen as a source of group identity within social networks that had a higher prevalence of smoking behaviors. Participants reported that smoking had some positive impacts on their social interaction, because it facilitated work breaks and increased communication with peers.
Reasons people decided to try to quit
Throughout the focus groups and interviews, individuals identified several reasons why they tried to quit smoking. These included: health, diagnosis of cancer (self, family, or friend), gum disease, pregnancy, hospital stay, worry that it will “kill me,” dislike of taste or odor, social reasons, change in surroundings (fewer smoking spaces), and price.
Reasons people do not like alternatives to cigarettes
The participants’ reasons for not liking alternatives to cigarettes (i.e., less harmful TNPs/RRPs) included perceptions that the alternatives did not work (i.e., the participants still had cravings and experienced withdrawal symptoms), made them feel or get ill (nausea and vomiting), were not “the same” as cigarettes in terms of the ritual, taste, or “feeling,” or were inconvenient/too big to carry.
The conclusions of the expert panel widely supported the findings of the literature review and the input from the reanalyzed focus groups and interviews. Some of the experts working in field of tobacco and nicotine provided additional insights based on their extensive experience with people who use TNPs; they highlighted the importance of the enjoyment of smoking for people who find it difficult to quit, the positive immediate benefits of quitting, and the smoking-related biomarkers that might be on a causal pathway between switching and changes in health and functioning status.
The following main areas were discussed and agreed during the meeting: (1) utility of use, referring to the perceived satisfaction and enjoyment of smoking (e.g., craving relief, weight control, and social affiliation); (2) signs and symptoms of withdrawal (e.g., anxiety, depression, and anger) and the positive immediate physical health effects of quitting smoking (e.g., better general and oral hygiene, less coughing, and improved exercise capacity); (3) functioning, including cognitive, physical, sexual, social, emotional, and role functioning; (4) worry associated with smoking and smoking-related diseases; (5) general health perceptions and quality of life; (6) association with smoking-related biomarkers that could be on the causal pathway between switching and changes in health and functioning; and (7) TNP use patterns and maintenance of switching to RRPs.
Generation of the preliminary conceptual framework
Triangulation of the findings from the literature review, qualitative input from people who use TNPs, and expert panel feedback helped generate a preliminary descriptive conceptual framework that includes the health and functioning and conceptually-related domains impacted by TNP use (Fig. 2 ).
![tobacco topics research paper figure 2](https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12954-021-00526-z/MediaObjects/12954_2021_526_Fig2_HTML.png)
Health and functioning conceptual framework related to tobacco and/or nicotine product use from the preparatory phase research findings
Four domains related to the future health and functioning measurement model for TNP use are indicated in grey rectangular boxes and include (moving down from proximal to distal parameters) physical health symptoms (e.g., oral and respiratory symptoms), general physical condition (e.g., appearance and hygiene), functioning (physical, sexual, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning), and general health perceptions, which will be the most distal measure of health and functioning. The preparatory phase research also identified six conceptually-related domains (in dashed rectangular boxes), which are not direct indicators of health status but might influence the impact of TNP use on health and functioning. These include attitudinal variables (worry about the health risks of using TNPs and perceived dependence/fear of withdrawal symptoms associated with quitting smoking), and utilitarian ones (perceived appeal, satisfaction, and benefits of TNP use). In addition, personal factors (e.g., sociodemographic) and environmental factors (e.g., peer/family influence, policies and regulations and sociocultural context) are also reflected in the conceptual framework as indirect indicators of health and functioning.
The framework further indicates that specific behavioral indicators (i.e., TNP use patterns over time) might influence any impact of TNP use on health and functioning. Whilst other causal and reciprocal relationships and hierarchies might exist within the domains, these are not explicitly characterized in this initial draft of the framework and will have to be tested with further empirical data. Finally, identified biomarkers of potential harm (in italics and dashed box) are also integrated in this conceptual framework as part of the conceptually-related domains, because they are on a causal pathway between TNP use and changes in health and functioning [ 133 , 134 ]. Biomarkers are not part of the measurement model that will be considered for a new self-report measure; however, because they are the most proximal parameters to health and functioning, they will be assessed independently as appropriate endpoints by objective clinical or biological analyses.
Triangulation of published literature, reanalysis of qualitative data, and expert opinion helped develop the presented preliminary conceptual framework as the foundation for a new measure to assess the impact of TNPs on self-reported health and functioning. This is essential for identifying relevant concepts and understanding what is important to measure in people who use TNPs. The findings reveal the importance of not only the perceived impacts of TNP use on physical health and physical functioning, but also on aspects of mental health and social interactions and functioning, and general perceptions of health and health-related quality of life.
For the literature review, the WHO ICF [ 28 ] and Wilson and Cleary model [ 29 , 30 ] served as useful guides to develop categories for data abstraction. The scoping literature review yielded 97 articles on TNP use and the relationship to health, perceptions of health, social and individual functioning, and quality of life. Overall, most studies had focused on the known negative effects of cigarette smoking (e.g., mental, respiratory, and oral health) and the rationale and motivation to quit smoking. The WHO ICF and Wilson and Clearly models were not always sufficient for identifying the breadth of relevant concepts, especially from the perspective of TNP use. Development of new codes for the reanalysis of existing qualitative data allowed for the development, extension, and exploration of the topic and provided valuable insights reported in the qualitative data reanalysis, such as the perceived benefits/satisfaction from cigarette smoking, and the rationale for quitting smoking or switching to an RRP. The findings show how this manner of secondary analysis can be valuable in health-related fields where the topic is broad and an existing body of knowledge can contribute by offering a different perspective [ 135 ].
The presentation of the preliminary conceptual framework from this preparatory phase is specific to TNP use and marks a slight departure from the established norms and characterization of the variables typically observed in existing generic health and functioning and health-related quality of life models, such as the WHO ICF and Wilson and Clearly models. Notably, specific hypothesized relationships and the hierarchy between domains are not explicitly characterized in the current draft of the framework. The framework provided an exploratory representation of the current findings to reflect a measurement instrument in people who use TNPs that would ideally be able to assess and demonstrate improvements in self-reported health and functioning status, stability of perceived positive aspects of using TNPs, and no worsening in key areas of physical and emotional health and functioning upon switching to RRPs. Nevertheless, the framework could still undergo further refinement to support the development and validation of a new measure and to further characterize and test the relationships and hierarchies between domains.
This work is not without limitations. For the scoping literature review, among the reviewed articles, not many reported on the use of e-cigarettes and other alternative tobacco or nicotine-delivery devices, because most studies had focused exclusively on cigarettes. It is possible that concepts associated with health and functioning that are relevant to other TNPs were not identified. This is most likely the consequence of the large number of publications related to cigarette use. Some concepts might also have been missed, given the large evidence base on health and functioning-related themes and concepts. However, this was also not a systematic literature search; a scoping review is generally broader than a systematic review in terms of the former having a less-defined research question, broader inclusion and exclusion criteria, and no systematic appraisal of study quality [ 26 ]. Nevertheless, the present scoping review methodology provides a lens on the overall evidence base, and regular updates on the search—specifically related to RRPs and novel TNPs and their health and functioning impacts—could be considered for fully understanding the evolving state of the art in this context. The reanalysis of existing qualitative data also has limitations related to data fit and completeness of preexisting data [ 136 ]. The insights collected from these reanalyzed studies were originally for a different purpose several years prior to the present research, and this might not completely and accurately reflect the objectives of the new project.
Considering the findings of the current research, the development of a health and functioning measure can continue to follow the FDA’s Guidance on PRO measures. As specified within the guideline, gaining input directly from the intended use populations through concept elicitation is a critical activity for ensuring content validity during the development of any new self-reported measure [ 137 ]. Continuous engagement with an expert panel can also support the refinement of the conceptual framework as well as the development of the draft and final measure.
The goal of this research was to identify from varied research activities key concepts and aspects of health and functioning and related changes associated with the use of TNPs. The resulting preliminary conceptual framework provides the basis for informing future research to further understand health and functioning concepts important to measure in individual who switch to RRPs and to develop a new self-report measure to assess this from the consumers’ perspective.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
Abbreviations
Assessment of Behavioral OUtcomes related to Tobacco and Nicotine Products Toolbox
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Food and Drug Administration
Health-related quality of life
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
- Modified risk tobacco products
Nicotine replacement therapy
Patient-Reported Outcomes
Quality of life
Reduced-risk products
Rapid Evidence Mapping
- Tobacco and/or nicotine products
United Kingdom
United States
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey
World Health Organization
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking: 50 years of progress. A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.
Google Scholar
Danaei G, Ding EL, Mozaffarian D, Taylor B, Rehm J, Murray CJL, et al. The preventable causes of death in the United States: comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLoS Med. 2009;6(4):e1000058.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bilano V, Gilmour S, Moffiet T, d’Espaignet ET, Stevens GA, Commar A, et al. Global trends and projections for tobacco use, 1990–2025: an analysis of smoking indicators from the WHO Comprehensive Information Systems for Tobacco Control. Lancet. 2015;385(9972):966–76.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Zeller M, Hatsukami D. The strategic dialogue on tobacco harm reduction: a vision and blueprint for action in the US. Tob Control. 2009;18(4):324–32.
Food and Drug Administration. Modified risk orders 2020. https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/advertising-and-promotion/modified-risk-orders .
Food and Drug Administration. Modified risk tobacco product applications: draft guidance for industry 2012. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/modified-risk-tobacco-product-applications .
Institute of Medicine. Scientific standards for studies on modified risk tobacco products. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012. p. 370.
Stratton K, Kwan LY, Eaton DL, editors. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Public health consequences of e-cigarettes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2018. p. 774.
Lappas AS, Tzortzi AS, Konstantinidi EM, Teloniatis SI, Tzavara CK, Gennimata SA, et al. Short-term respiratory effects of e-cigarettes in healthy individuals and smokers with asthma. Respirology. 2018;23(3):291–7.
Meo SA, Ansary MA, Barayan FR, Almusallam AS, Almehaid AM, Alarifi NS, et al. Electronic cigarettes: impact on lung function and fractional exhaled nitric oxide among healthy adults. Am J Men’s Health. 2019;13(1):1557988318806073.
Article Google Scholar
Polosa R, Cibella F, Caponnetto P, Maglia M, Prosperini U, Russo C, et al. Health impact of E-cigarettes: a prospective 3.5-year study of regular daily users who have never smoked. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13825.
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Sharman A, Zhussupov B, Sharman D, Kim I, Yerenchina E. Lung function in users of a smoke-free electronic device with HeatSticks (iQOS) versus smokers of conventional cigarettes: protocol for a longitudinal cohort observational study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018;7(11):e10006.
Skotsimara G, Antonopoulos AS, Oikonomou E, Siasos G, Ioakeimidis N, Tsalamandris S, et al. Cardiovascular effects of electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26(11):1219–28.
Wang JB, Olgin JE, Nah G, Vittinghoff E, Cataldo JK, Pletcher MJ, et al. Cigarette and e-cigarette dual use and risk of cardiopulmonary symptoms in the Health eHeart Study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0198681.
Ware JE Jr, Gandek B, Kulasekaran A, Guyer R. Evaluation of smoking-specific and generic quality of life measures in current and former smokers in Germany and the United States. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:128.
Frendl DM, Ware JE Jr. Patient-reported functional health and well-being outcomes with drug therapy: a systematic review of randomized trials using the SF-36 health survey. Med Care. 2014;52(5):439–45.
Goldenberg M, Danovitch I, IsHak WW. Quality of life and smoking. Am J Addict. 2014;23(6):540–62.
Olufade AO, Shaw JW, Foster SA, Leischow SJ, Hays RD, Coons SJ. Development of the smoking cessation quality of life questionnaire. Clin Ther. 1999;21(12):2113–30.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sarna L, Bialous SA, Cooley ME, Jun HJ, Feskanich D. Impact of smoking and smoking cessation on health-related quality of life in women in the Nurses’ Health Study. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(10):1217–27.
Kulasekaran A, Proctor C, Papadopoulou E, Shepperd CJ, Guyer R, Gandek B, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a new german translated tobacco quality of life impact tool to discriminate between healthy current and former smokers and to explore the effect of switching smokers to a reduced toxicant prototype cigarette. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(12):1456–64.
Edelen MO. The PROMIS smoking assessment toolkit–background and introduction to supplement. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(Suppl 3):S170–4.
Shaw JW, Coons SJ, Foster SA, Leischow SJ, Hays RD. Responsiveness of the Smoking Cessation Quality of Life (SCQoL) questionnaire. Clin Ther. 2001;23(6):957–69.
Chrea C, Acquadro C, Afolalu EF, Spies E, Salzberger T, Abetz-Webb L, et al. Developing fit-for-purpose self-report instruments for assessing consumer responses to tobacco and nicotine products: the ABOUT Toolbox initiative. F1000Res. 2018;7:1878.
Food and Drug Administration. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims 2009. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-reported-outcome-measures-use-medical-product-development-support-labeling-claims .
Food and Drug Administration. Patient-focused drug development: methods to identify what is important to patients guidance for industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Other Stakeholders 2019. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-focused-drug-development-methods-identify-what-important-patients-guidance-industry-food-and .
Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):143.
Lam J, Howard BE, Thayer K, Shah RR. Low-calorie sweeteners and health outcomes: a demonstration of rapid evidence mapping (rEM). Environ Int. 2019;123:451–8.
World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) 2001. https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/ .
Ferrans CE, Zerwic JJ, Wilbur JE, Larson JL. Conceptual model of health-related quality of life. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(4):336–42.
Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273(1):59–65.
Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(7):645–9.
Moons P. Why call it health-related quality of life when you mean perceived health status? Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;3(4):275–7.
Cano S, Chrea C, Salzberger T, Alfieri T, Emilien G, Mainy N, et al. Development and validation of a new instrument to measure perceived risks associated with the use of tobacco and nicotine-containing products. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):192.
Salzberger T, Chrea C, Cano SJ, Martin M, Atkison M, Emilien G, et al. Perceived risks associated with the use of tobacco and nicotine-containing products: findings from qualitative research. Tobacco Sci Technol. 2017;50:32–42.
Chrea C, Salzberger T, Abetz-Webb L, Afolalu EF, Cano S, Rose J, et al. PRM183—development of a fit-for-purpose tobacco and nicotine products dependence instrument. Barcelona: ISPOR Europe; 2018.
Book Google Scholar
Quirkos 2.3.1 [Computer Software] 2020. https://www.quirkos.com .
Abu-Helalah MA, Alshraideh HA, Al-Serhan AA, Nesheiwat AI, Da’na M, Al-Nawafleh A. Epidemiology, attitudes and perceptions toward cigarettes and hookah smoking amongst adults in Jordan. Environ Health Prev Med. 2015;20(6):422–33.
Akturk E, Yağmur J, Açıkgöz N, Ermi N, Cansel M, Karaku Y, et al. Assessment of atrial conduction time by tissue Doppler echocardiography and P-wave dispersion in smokers. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;34(2):247–53.
Aubin HJ, Peiffer G, Stoebner-Delbarre A, Vicaut E, Jeanpetit Y, Solesse A, et al. The French Observational Cohort of Usual Smokers (FOCUS) cohort: French smokers perceptions and attitudes towards smoking cessation. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(100):1–8.
Becoña E, Vázquez MI, Míguez MC, Fernández del Río E, López-Durán A, Martínez Ú, et al. Smoking habit profile and health-related quality of life. Psicothema. 2013;25(4):421–6.
PubMed Google Scholar
Bennasar Veny M, Pericas Beltrán J, González Torrente S, Segui González P, Aguiló Pons A, Tauler RP. Self-perceived factors associated with smoking cessation among primary health care nurses: a qualitative study. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2011;19(6):1437–44.
Bommelé J, Schoenmakers TM, Kleinjan M, van Straaten B, Wits E, Snelleman M, et al. Perceived pros and cons of smoking and quitting in hard-core smokers: a focus group study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:175–85.
Borland R, Yong HH, O’Connor RJ, Hyland A, Thompson ME. The reliability and predictive validity of the Heaviness of Smoking Index and its two components: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(Suppl 1):S45-50.
Bot M, Vink J, Milaneschi Y, Smit JH, Kluft C, Neuteboom J, et al. Plasma cotinine levels in cigarette smokers: impact of mental health and other correlates. Eur Addict Res. 2014;20(4):183–91.
Brody AL, Olmstead RE, Abrams AL, Costello MR, Khan A, Kozman D, et al. Effect of a history of major depressive disorder on smoking-induced dopamine release. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66(9):898–901.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brook DW, Rubenstone E, Zhang C, Brook JS. Trajectories of cigarette smoking in adulthood predict insomnia among women in late mid-life. Sleep Med. 2012;13(9):1130–7.
Brotman RM, He X, Gajer P, Fadrosh D, Sharma E, Mongodin EF, et al. Association between cigarette smoking and the vaginal microbiota: a pilot study. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:471–82.
Brown-Johnson CG, Cataldo JK, Orozco N, Lisha NE, Hickman NJ 3rd, Prochaska JJ. Validity and reliability of the Internalized Stigma of Smoking Inventory: an exploration of shame, isolation, and discrimination in smokers with mental health diagnoses. Am J Addict. 2015;24(5):410–8.
Bush T, Hsu C, Levine MD, Magnusson B, Miles L. Weight gain and smoking: perceptions and experiences of obese quitline participants. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1229.
Caldirola D, Cavedini P, Riva A, Di Chiaro NV, Perna G. Cigarette smoking has no pro-cognitive effect in subjects with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a preliminary study. Psychiatr Danub. 2016;28(1):86–90.
Caldirola D, Daccò S, Grassi M, Citterio A, Menotti R, Cavedini P, et al. Effects of cigarette smoking on neuropsychological performance in mood disorders: a comparison between smoking and nonsmoking inpatients. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(2):e130–6.
Carpenter MJ, Gray KM. A pilot randomized study of smokeless tobacco use among smokers not interested in quitting: changes in smoking behavior and readiness to quit. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(2):136–43.
Croucher R, Haque MF, Kassim S. Oral pain before and after smokeless tobacco cessation in U.K.-resident Bangladeshi women: cross-sectional analyses. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 2013;15(5):896–903.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Depp CA, Bowie CR, Mausbach BT, Wolyniec P, Thornquist MH, Luke JR, et al. Current smoking is associated with worse cognitive and adaptive functioning in serious mental illness. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015;131(5):333–41.
Ditre JW, Zale EL, Heckman BW, Hendricks PS. A measure of perceived pain and tobacco smoking interrelations: pilot validation of the pain and smoking inventory. Cogn Behav Ther. 2017;46(6):339–51.
Doiron M, Dupré N, Langlois M, Provencher P, Simard M. Smoking history is associated to cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Aging Ment Health. 2017;21(3):322–6.
Gonzalez A, Zvolensky MJ, Vujanovic AA, Leyro TM, Marshall EC. An evaluation of anxiety sensitivity, emotional dysregulation, and negative affectivity among daily cigarette smokers: relation to smoking motives and barriers to quitting. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;43(2):138–47.
Grogan S, Fry G, Gough B, Conner M. Smoking to stay thin or giving up to save face? Young men and women talk about appearance concerns and smoking. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14(1):175–86.
Hawari FI, Obeidat NA, Ghonimat IM, Ayub HS, Dawahreh SS. The effect of habitual waterpipe tobacco smoking on pulmonary function and exercise capacity in young healthy males: A pilot study. Respir Med. 2017;122:71–5.
Heffernan TM, O’Neill TS, Moss M. Smoking-related prospective memory deficits in a real-world task. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;120(1–3):1–6.
Highland KB, McChargue DE. Stress-induced cardiovascular reactivity among African American smokers. Am J Health Behav. 2011;35(1):51–9.
Holley AL, Law EF, Tham SW, Myaing M, Noonan C, Strachan E, et al. Current smoking as a predictor of chronic musculoskeletal pain in young adult twins. J Pain. 2013;14(10):1131–9.
Ichikawa Y, Kitagawa K, Kato S, Dohi K, Hirano T, Ito M, et al. Altered coronary endothelial function in young smokers detected by magnetic resonance assessment of myocardial blood flow during the cold pressor test. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30:73–80.
Javed F, Abduljabbar T, Vohra F, Malmstrom H, Rahman I, Romanos GE. Comparison of periodontal parameters and self-perceived oral symptoms among cigarette smokers, individuals vaping electronic cigarettes, and never-smokers. J Periodontol. 2017;88(10):1059–65.
Johnson AL, McLeish AC. Differences in panic psychopathology between smokers with and without asthma. Psychol Health Med. 2017;22(1):110–20.
Kahler CW, Daughters SB, Leventhal AM, Rogers ML, Clark MA, Colby SM, et al. Personality, psychiatric disorders, and smoking in middle-aged adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(7):833–41.
Karadoğan D, Önal Ö, Şahin D, Yazıcı S, Kanbay Y. Evaluation of school teachers’ sociodemographic characteristics and quality of life according to their cigarette smoking status: a cross-sectional study from eastern Black Sea region of Turkey. Tuberkuloz ve toraks. 2017;65(1):18–24.
Kim J, Gall SL, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, Sturm JW, Thrift AG. Baseline smoking status and the long-term risk of death or nonfatal vascular event in people with stroke: a 10-year survival analysis. Stroke. 2012;43(12):3173–8.
Kim J, Lee S. Using focus group interviews to analyze the behavior of users of new types of tobacco products. J Prev Med Public Health. 2017;50(5):336–46.
Kralikova E, Novak J, West O, Kmetova A, Hajek P. Do e-cigarettes have the potential to compete with conventional cigarettes?: a survey of conventional cigarette smokers’ experiences with e-cigarettes. Chest. 2013;144(5):1609–14.
Lao XQ, Jiang CQ, Zhang WS, Adab P, Lam TH, Cheng KK, et al. Smoking, smoking cessation and inflammatory markers in older Chinese men: The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study. Atherosclerosis. 2009;203(1):304–10.
Lappan S, Thorne CB, Long D, Hendricks PS. Longitudinal and reciprocal relationships between psychological well-being and smoking. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;22(1):18–23.
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lynch ME, Johnson KC, Kable JA, Carroll J, Coles CD. Smoking in pregnancy and parenting stress: maternal psychological symptoms and socioeconomic status as potential mediating variables. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(7):532–9.
Lyvers M, Carlopio C, Honours VB, Edwards MS. Mood, mood regulation, and frontal systems functioning in current smokers, long-term abstinent ex-smokers, and never-smokers. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014;46(2):133–9.
Martin LM, Sayette MA. A review of the effects of nicotine on social functioning. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018;26(5):425–39.
Martinasek MP, McDermott RJ, Bryant CA. Antecedents of university students’ hookah smoking intention. Am J Health Behav. 2013;37(5):599–609.
Mattey DL, Dawson SR, Healey EL, Packham JC. Relationship between smoking and patient-reported measures of disease outcome in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(12):2608–15.
McCann SJ. Subjective well-being, personality, demographic variables, and American state differences in smoking prevalence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(9):895–904.
McDonald EA, Ling PM. One of several “toys” for smoking: young adult experiences with electronic cigarettes in New York City. Tob Control. 2015;24(6):588–93.
McLeish AC, Zvolensky MJ, Del Ben KS, Burke RS. Anxiety sensitivity as a moderator of the association between smoking rate and panic-relevant symptoms among a community sample of middle-aged adult daily smokers. Am J Addict. 2009;18(1):93–9.
Melis M, Lobo SL, Ceneviz C, Ruparelia UN, Zawawi KH, Chandwani BP, et al. Effect of cigarette smoking on pain intensity of TMD patients: a pilot study. Cranio. 2010;28(3):187–92.
Memon A, Barber J, Rumsby E, Parker S, Mohebati L, de Visser RO, et al. What factors are important in smoking cessation and relapse in women from deprived communities? A qualitative study in Southeast England. Public Health. 2016;134:39–45.
Mendiondo MS, Alexander LA, Crawford T. Health profile differences for menthol and non-menthol smokers: findings from the National Health Interview Survey. Addiction. 2010;105(Suppl 1):124–40.
Miyatake N, Numata T, Nishii K, Sakano N, Suzue T, Hirao T, et al. Influence of cigarette smoking on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in Japanese male workers. Acta Med Okayama. 2010;64:385–90.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mohammadi S, Mazhari MM, Mehrparvar AH, Attarchi MS. Cigarette smoking and occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Eur J Public Health. 2009;20(4):452–5.
Mohammadnezhad M, Tsourtos G, Wilson C, Ratcliffe J, Ward P. “I have never experienced any problem with my health. So far, it hasn’t been harmful”: older Greek-Australian smokers’ views on smoking: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:304–15.
Morris MC, Mielock AS, Rao U. Salivary stress biomarkers of recent nicotine use and dependence. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2016;42(6):640–8.
Muir S, Marshall B. Changes in health perceptions of male prisoners following a smoking cessation program. J Correct Health Care. 2016;22(3):247–56.
Nelson JP, Pederson LL, Lewis J. Tobacco use in the Army: illuminating patterns, practices, and options for treatment. Mil Med. 2009;174(2):162–9.
Nemeth JM, Liu ST, Klein EG, Ferketich AK, Kwan MP, Wewers ME. Factors influencing smokeless tobacco use in rural Ohio Appalachia. J Community Health. 2012;37(6):1208–17.
Nikcevic AV, Spada MM. Metacognitions about smoking: a preliminary investigation. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010;17(6):536–42.
Nunes SO, Vargas HO, Brum J, Prado E, Vargas MM, de Castro MR, et al. A comparison of inflammatory markers in depressed and nondepressed smokers. Nord J Psychiatry. 2012;14:540–6.
CAS Google Scholar
Oh DL, Heck JE, Dresler C, Allwright S, Haglund M, Del Mazo SS, et al. Determinants of smoking initiation among women in five European countries: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(74):1–11.
Pasco JA, Williams LJ, Jacka FN, Ng F, Henry MJ, Nicholson GC, et al. Tobacco smoking as a risk factor for major depressive disorder: population-based study. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193(4):322–6.
Pina JA, Namba MD, Leyrer-Jackson JM, Cabrera-Brown G, Gipson CD. Social influences on nicotine-related behaviors. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;140:1–32.
Poole-Di Salvo E, Liu YH, Brenner S, Weitzman M. Adult household smoking is associated with increased child emotional and behavioral problems. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2010;31(2):107–15.
Rahman MA, Mahmood MA, Spurrier N, Rahman M, Choudhury SR, Leeder S. Why do Bangladeshi people use smokeless tobacco products? Asia-Pacific J Public Health. 2015;27(2):NP2197–209.
Rollini F, Franchi F, Cho JR, Degroat C, Bhatti M, Ferrante E, et al. Cigarette smoking and antiplatelet effects of aspirin monotherapy versus clopidogrel monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic disease: results of a prospective pharmacodynamic study. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014;7(1):53–63.
Romijnders K, van Osch L, de Vries H, Talhout R. Perceptions and reasons regarding e-cigarette use among users and non-users: a narrative literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(6):1190.
Rooke C, Cunningham-Burley S, Amos A. Smokers’ and ex-smokers’ understanding of electronic cigarettes: a qualitative study. Tob Control. 2016;25:e60–6.
Roth B, Bengtsson M, Ohlsson B. Diarrhoea is not the only symptom that needs to be treated in patients with microscopic colitis. Eur J Intern Med. 2013;24(6):573–8.
Sales MP, Oliveira MI, Mattos IM, Viana CM, Pereira ED. The impact of smoking cessation on patient quality of life. J Bras Pneumol. 2009;35(5):436–41.
Schane RE, Prochaska JJ, Glantz SA. Counseling nondaily smokers about secondhand smoke as a cessation message: a pilot randomized trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(2):334–42.
Schnoll RA, Goren A, Annunziata K, Suaya JA. The prevalence, predictors and associated health outcomes of high nicotine dependence using three measures among US smokers. Addiction. 2013;108(11):1989–2000.
Segarra R, Zabala A, Eguíluz JI, Ojeda N, Elizagarate E, Sánchez P, et al. Cognitive performance and smoking in first-episode psychosis: the self-medication hypothesis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;261(4):241–50.
Sherratt FC, Newson L, Marcus MW, Field JK, Robinson J. Perceptions towards electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation among Stop Smoking Service users. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;21(2):421–33.
Soneji SS, Sung HY, Primack BA, Pierce JP, Sargent JD. Quantifying population-level health benefits and harms of e-cigarette use in the United States. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0193328.
Talati A, Wickramaratne PJ, Keyes KM, Hasin DS, Levin FR, Weissman MM. Smoking and psychopathology increasingly associated in recent birth cohorts. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;133(2):724–32.
Tan QH. Smoking spaces as enabling spaces of wellbeing. Health Place. 2013;24:173–82.
Tatullo M, Gentile S, Paduano F, Santacroce L, Marrelli M. Crosstalk between oral and general health status in e-smokers. Medicine. 2016;95(49):e5589.
Taylor G, McNeill A, Girling A, Farley A, Lindson-Hawley N, Aveyard P. Change in mental health after smoking cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;348:g1151-g.
Thompson TP, Greaves CJ, Ayres R, Aveyard P, Warren FC, Byng R, et al. An exploratory analysis of the smoking and physical activity outcomes from a pilot randomized controlled trial of an exercise assisted reduction to stop smoking intervention in disadvantaged groups. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(3):289–97.
Torigian DA, Green-McKenzie J, Liu X, Shofer FS, Werner T, Smith CE, et al. A study of the feasibility of FDG-PET/CT to systematically detect and quantify differential metabolic effects of chronic tobacco use in organs of the whole body—a prospective pilot study. Acad Radiol. 2017;24:930–40.
Ulvik A, Ebbing M, Hustad S, Midttun Ø, Nygård O, Vollset SE, et al. Long- and short-term effects of tobacco smoking on circulating concentrations of B vitamins. Clin Chem. 2010;56(5):755–63.
Vidrine JI, Businelle MS, Cinciripini P, Li Y, Marcus MT, Waters AJ, et al. Associations of mindfulness with nicotine dependence, withdrawal, and agency. Subst Abus. 2009;30(4):318–27.
Volkman JE, DeRycke EC, Driscoll MA, Becker WC, Brandt CA, Mattocks KM, et al. Smoking status and pain intensity among OEF/OIF/OND veterans. Pain Med. 2015;16(9):1690–6.
Vujanovic AA, Marshall-Berenz EC, Beckham JC, Bernstein A, Zvolensky MJ. Posttraumatic stress symptoms and cigarette deprivation in the prediction of anxious responding among trauma-exposed smokers: a laboratory test. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(11):1080–8.
Wadsworth E, Neale J, McNeill A, Hitchman SC. How and why do smokers start using e-cigarettes? Qualitative study of Vapers in London, UK. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(7):661–74.
Article PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Xie X, Dijkstra AE, Vonk JM, Oudkerk M, Vliegenthart R, Groen HJ. Chronic respiratory symptoms associated with airway wall thickening measured by thin-slice low-dose CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(4):W383–90.
Yang T, Shiffman S, Rockett IR, Cui X, Cao R. Nicotine dependence among Chinese city dwellers: a population-based cross-sectional study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(7):556–64.
Yu A, Cai X, Zhang Z, Shi H, Liu D, Zhang P, et al. Effect of nicotine dependence on opioid requirements of patients after thoracic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(1):115–22.
Zhang X, Kahende J, Fan AZ, Barker L, Thompson TJ, Mokdad AH, et al. Smoking and visual impairment among older adults with age-related eye diseases. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(4):A84.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao L, Xu L, Lai Y, Che C, Zhou Y. Temporal changes of smoking status and motivation in Chinese patients with hepatitis B: relationship with anxiety and depression. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(15–16):2193–201.
Zorlu N, Cropley VL, Zorlu PK, Delibas DH, Adibelli ZH, Baskin EP, et al. Effects of cigarette smoking on cortical thickness in major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;84:1–8.
Miyatake N, Numata T, Nishii K, Sakano N, Suzue T, Hirao T, et al. Relation between cigarette smoking and ventilatory threshold in the Japanese. Environ Health Prev Med. 2011;16(3):185–90.
Bjørngaard JH, Gunnell D, Elvestad MB, Davey Smith G, Skorpen F, Krokan H, et al. The causal role of smoking in anxiety and depression: a Mendelian randomization analysis of the HUNT study. Psychol Med. 2012;43(4):711–9.
Chen SC, Chen HF, Peng HL, Lee LY, Chiang TY, Chiu HC. Psychometric testing of the Chinese-Version Glover-Nilsson Smoking Behavioral Questionnaire (GN-SBQ-C) for the identification of nicotine dependence in adult smokers in Taiwan. Int J Behav Med. 2017;24(2):272–9.
Doran N, Spring B, McChargue D, Pergadia M, Richmond M. Impulsivity and smoking relapse. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6:641–7.
Haller CS, Etter JF, Courvoisier DS. Trajectories in cigarette dependence as a function of anxiety: a multilevel analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;139:115–20.
Jamal M, Van der Does AJW, Cuijpers P, Penninx BW. Association of smoking and nicotine dependence with severity and course of symptoms in patients with depressive or anxiety disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;126(1–2):138–46.
Krishnan-Sarin S, Reynolds B, Duhig A, Smith A, Liss T, McFetridge A, et al. Behavioral impulsivity predicts treatment outcome in a smoking cessation program for adolescent smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88:79–82.
Tidey JW, Pacek LR, Koopmeiners JS, Vandrey R, Nardone N, Drobes DJ, et al. Effects of 6-week use of reduced-nicotine content cigarettes in smokers with and without elevated depressive symptoms. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;19(Suppl 1):59–67.
Chang CM, Cheng YC, Cho TM, Mishina EV, Del Valle-Pinero AY, van Bemmel DM, et al. Biomarkers of potential harm: summary of an FDA-sponsored public workshop. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;21(1):3–13.
Haziza C, de La Bourdonnaye G, Donelli A, Skiada D, Poux V, Weitkunat R, et al. Favorable changes in biomarkers of potential harm to reduce the adverse health effects of smoking in smokers switching to the menthol tobacco heating system 2.2 for three months (part 2). Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;22(4):549–59.
Bishop L, Kuula-Luumi A. Revisiting qualitative data reuse: a decade on. SAGE Open. 2017;7(1):1–15.
Sherif V. Evaluating preexisting qualitative research data for secondary analysis. In: Forum: qualitative social research, vol. 19, no. 2. 2018.
Patrick D, Burke L, Gwaltney C, Leidy N, Martin M, Molsen E, et al. Content validity—establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1—eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health. 2011;14(8):967–77.
Download references
Acknowledgements
We thank the team at Sciome LLC for their assistance and contribution to the literature review. We thank Vivienne Law and David Floyd for their contributions to the literature review, reanalysis of qualitative data, and assistance with review of the draft manuscript. We thank Catherine Acquadro for her review of the draft manuscript. We also thank John Ware, Jed Rose, Ashley Slagle, Donald Patrick, Karl Fagerström, Stefan Cano, and Thomas Salzberger for their input and review.
Philip Morris International is the sole source of funding and sponsor of this research.
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
PMI R&D, Philip Morris Product S.A., Quai Jeanrenaud 5, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Esther F. Afolalu, Erica Spies, Agnes Bacso, Emilie Clerc, Sophie Gallot & Christelle Chrea
Patient-Centered Outcomes Assessments Ltd., 1 Springbank, Bollington, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 5LQ, UK
Linda Abetz-Webb
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Contributions
EA, ES and CC performed conceptualization. EA, ES and LA-W performed methodology. EA, ES, SG, EC and LA-W were involved in the investigation. EA and ES were involved in writing—original draft. EA, EC, LA-W and CC were involved in writing—review & editing. EA performed visualization. ES and CC performed supervision. AB, EC and SG were involved in data curation. AB and EC were involved in project administration. LA-W performed formal analysis. CC was involved in funding acquisition. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Esther F. Afolalu .
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Competing interests.
Esther F. Afolalu, Emilie Clerc, and Christelle Chrea are employees of Philip Morris International. Agnes Bacso, Erica Spies, and Sophie Gallot completed the work during prior employment with Philip Morris International. Linda Abetz-Webb is a consultant for Philip Morris International.
Additional information
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Work completed during prior affiliation with PMI R&D: Erica Spies, Agnes Bacso, Sophie Gallot.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1..
Summary tables of results of scoping literature review
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article.
Afolalu, E.F., Spies, E., Bacso, A. et al. Impact of tobacco and/or nicotine products on health and functioning: a scoping review and findings from the preparatory phase of the development of a new self-report measure. Harm Reduct J 18 , 79 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00526-z
Download citation
Received : 14 October 2020
Accepted : 21 July 2021
Published : 30 July 2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00526-z
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Health and functioning
- Scoping review
- Qualitative research
- Conceptual framework
Harm Reduction Journal
ISSN: 1477-7517
- Submission enquiries: [email protected]
- Search Menu
- Sign in through your institution
- Supplements
- Advance articles
- Editor's Choice
- Special Issues
- Author Guidelines
- Submission Site
- Why Publish With Us?
- Open Access
- About Nicotine & Tobacco Research
- About Society for Nicotine & Tobacco Research
- Editorial Board
- Advertising and Corporate Services
- Journals Career Network
- Self-Archiving Policy
- Dispatch Dates
- Journals on Oxford Academic
- Books on Oxford Academic
Browse issues
![tobacco topics research paper Issue Cover](https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/ntr/Issue/26/9/2/m_cover.jpeg?Expires=1728724503&Signature=oIXSH55Fi0Oz8EtpNyfO8TUJDVjVsVFMdjRkq64KvitkJJfXSbZYdN-1WHJ3DYIYkJbXHwyNyk~yMO8bnnqF-eV0ifnTA-sz-z8BRUeHOx9Nu41QRFiiBCi4YYN8vcY5ysEm3Ucx8C6cREFTPzlC00-ZcdHwaq2UpooOTN9htL-lBozke8D9gW-jII~oH8~cSEpjzc~YW5xnB4MY6BsExLyWiLcjIEfBEtsWlvCKTd51p8QPxRDBU0q25F048holPhsoqVIKCMfyDtAobM3RNhhafwcMjlOk9nNIjxMqyRWnMY3tHKSSG5I6jgyN2yf0cATKpNPioac4DQCsq5EmsA__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA)
Cover image
![tobacco topics research paper issue cover](https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/ntr/Issue/26/9/2/cover.jpeg?Expires=1728724503&Signature=a7RBkVL7wKUKKJLuORCXtjpOtei4uoICkp67b9LKqapcyGkAkCtcjWhhfqEs2Z5NyaeVPLzuM-BKPuB3YzNPURfGBpPf8Qoqgu~trezAHMXURdQMP~CL-q81HBYTC5Cr5WhKwA9vz3jv1Od3hxuliew3zH35xPt-alb0dZVQi-o9y49Vt1mBY9HN7EUIIYeQ5-ftXkud47wGYlupnU0Do-kAd5vmrbvNJ1o377F~p3EGLNGsApt4TOj1pNjwPT3DmF7kzdbZSf406osr8SJYtABBiNZLx-jEHn~H4HESxRMA1vr4MDvGYIWsuZr~vA-7xAs8whnIglSSNtbNJ1Pamw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA)
Volume 26, Issue 9, September 2024
Evaluations of compliance with california’s first tobacco sales bans and tobacco marketing in restricted and cross-border stores.
- View article
- Supplementary data
Content Analysis of E-mail Marketing Communications Among Online E-cigarette Retailers
Cigarette prices and smoking experimentation among zimbabwean children: a survival analysis of the 2014 global youth tobacco survey, using pod based e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches to reduce harm for adults with low socioeconomic status who smoke: a pilot randomized controlled trial, in-clinic versus online recruitment of women with a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer to a smoking cessation trial: a post hoc comparison of participant characteristics, study retention, and cessation outcomes, assessing the level of poverty and utilization of government social programs among tobacco farmers in indonesia, impact of total indoor smoking ban on cardiovascular disease hospitalizations and mortality: the case of chile, do flavor descriptions influence subjective ratings of flavored and unflavored e-liquids among nonsmoking and non-vaping uk adolescents, text message-based cessation intervention for people who smoked or used smokeless tobacco in india: a feasibility randomized controlled trial, improving enforcement measures and establishing clear criteria: a content analysis of tobacco-brand-owned instagram accounts, integration of a tobacco cessation program into a rural community-based maternal and child health program in india: a stakeholders’ perspective on task shifting, dual-vaping of nicotine and cannabis among adults who currently use tobacco products in five new england states, a method for amending loose smokeless tobacco with menthol for administration in clinical studies, methoxsalen inhibits the acquisition of nicotine self-administration: attenuation by cotinine replacement in male rats, effects of an increased financial incentive on follow-up in an online, automated smoking cessation trial: a randomized controlled study within a trial, sex-dependent occlusive cardiovascular disease effects of short-term thirdhand smoke exposure, comparison of indicators of dependence for vaping and smoking: trends between 2017 and 2022 among youth in canada, england, and the united states, switching away from smoking and reduction in cigarette consumption among u.s. adult purchasers of the juul system across 24 months including diverse subpopulations disproportionately affected by cigarette smoking, correction to: independent associations between different measures of socioeconomic position and smoking status: a cross-sectional study of adults in england, increasing the accessibility of nicotine & tobacco research —introducing alt text, correction to: commercial tobacco endgame goals: early experiences from six countries, what is (un)flavored a scoping review of the conceptualization of flavored cigarillos, email alerts.
- About Nicotine & Tobacco Research
- Recommend to your Library
Affiliations
- Online ISSN 1469-994X
- Copyright © 2024 Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
- About Oxford Academic
- Publish journals with us
- University press partners
- What we publish
- New features
- Open access
- Institutional account management
- Rights and permissions
- Get help with access
- Accessibility
- Advertising
- Media enquiries
- Oxford University Press
- Oxford Languages
- University of Oxford
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide
- Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
- Cookie settings
- Cookie policy
- Privacy policy
- Legal notice
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
![tobacco topics research paper USA flag icon](https://nida.nih.gov/themes/custom/solstice/images/uswds/us_flag_small.png)
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Tobacco, Nicotine, and E-Cigarettes Research Report What research is being done on tobacco use?
New scientific developments can improve our understanding of nicotine addiction and spur the development of better prevention and treatment strategies.
Genetics and Epigenetics
An estimated 50-75 percent of the risk for nicotine addiction is attributable to genetic factors. 221 A cluster of genes (CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4) on chromosome 15 that encode the α5, α3, and β4 protein subunits that make up the brain receptor for nicotine 221–223 are particularly implicated in nicotine dependence and smoking among people of European descent. Variation in the CHRNA5 gene influences the effectiveness of combination NRT, but not varenicline. 224 Other research has identified genes that influence nicotine metabolism and therefore, the number of cigarettes smoked, 225 responsiveness to medication, 204,205 and chances of successfully quitting. 226 For example, the therapeutic response to varenicline is associated with variants for the CHRNB2, CHRNA5, and CHRNA4 genes, while bupropion-related cessation is linked with variation in genes that affect nicotine metabolism. 227
Smoking can also lead to persistent changes in gene expression (epigenetic changes), which may contribute to associated medical consequences over the long term, even following cessation. 228 Epigenetic changes may serve as a potential biomarker for prenatal tobacco smoke exposure. Researchers found tobacco-specific changes at 26 sites on the epigenome, and this pattern predicted prenatal exposure with 81 percent accuracy. 229 A large scale meta-analysis of data on epigenetic changes associated with prenatal exposure to cigarette smoke also identified many epigenetic changes that persisted into later childhood. 230 More research is needed to understand the long-term health impacts of these changes.
Neuroimaging
Cutting-edge neuroimaging technologies have identified brain changes associated with nicotine dependence and smoking. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), scientists can visualize smokers’ brains as they respond to cigarette-associated cues that can trigger craving and relapse. 231 Such research may lead to a biomarker for relapse risk and for monitoring treatment progress, as well as point to regions of the brain involved in the development of nicotine addiction. 29
A neuroimaging technology called default-mode or resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) reveals intrinsic brain activity when people are alert but not performing a particular task. Using this technique, researchers are examining the neurobiological profile associated with withdrawal and how nicotine impacts cognition. 232 Comparisons between smokers and nonsmokers suggest that chronic nicotine may weaken connectivity within brain circuits involved in planning, paying attention, and behavioral control—possibly contributing to difficulty with quitting. 233 fMRI studies also reveal the impact of smoking cessation medications on the brain—particularly how they modulate the activity of different brain regions to alleviate withdrawal symptoms and reduce smoking. A review of these studies suggested that NRT enhances cognition during withdrawal by modulating activity in default-network regions, but may not affect neural circuits associated with nicotine addiction. 234
Some imaging techniques allow researchers to visualize neurotransmitters and their receptors, further informing our understanding of nicotine addiction and its treatment. 27 Using these techniques, researchers have established that smoking increases the number of brain receptors for nicotine. Individuals who show greater receptor upregulation are less likely to stop smoking. 28 Combining neuroimaging and genetics may yield particularly useful information for improving and tailoring treatment. For example, nonsmoking adolescents with a particular variant in the CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4 gene cluster (which is associated with nicotine dependence and smoking) showed reduced brain activity in response to reward in the striatum as well as the orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortex. This finding suggests that genetics can influence how the brain processes rewards which may influence vulnerability to nicotine dependence. 235 Neuroimaging genetics also shows that other genes, including ones that influence dopamine neurotransmission, influence reward sensitivity and risk for addiction to nicotine. 236
- Skip to main content
- Skip to FDA Search
- Skip to in this section menu
- Skip to footer links
![tobacco topics research paper U.S. flag](https://www.fda.gov/themes/custom/preview/assets/images/US_Flag.png)
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Search
- Menu
- Tobacco Products
Tobacco Science & Research
FDA supports science and research to help us better understand tobacco use and associated risks so that we can reduce the public health burden of tobacco in the United States.
Research programs and projects include, but are not limited to, the scientific fields of epidemiology, behavior, biology, medicine, economics, chemistry, engineering, toxicology, pharmacology, addiction, public health, communications, marketing, and statistics.
Research News
- PATH Study: Wave 1 through 5 Location Characteristics Data now available
- PATH Study Data User Workshop: Apply Now for the Summer 2024 Events
- PATH Study: Wave 7 Restricted-Use Files (RUFs) now available
- CTP and NIDA Announce the Continuation of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study
- FDA & NIH Announce Funding Awards for TCORS 3.0
- PATH Study: Wave 6 Public-Use Files now available
- PATH Study: Wave 6 Restricted-Use Files now available
- PATH Study: Wave 4 and Wave 5 Biomarker Restricted-Use Files (BRUFs) now available, including data from youth participants
- PATH Study: New Special Collection Public-Use Files (SCPUFs): Wave 5.5 and PATH Study Adult Telephone Survey (PATH-ATS)
- PATH Study: New Data Tables and Figures Available: Waves 1 - 5 (2013 – 2019)
- Find statistics about youth tobacco use from the most recent National Youth Tobacco Survey
CTP, in partnership with CDISC, released the Tobacco Implementation Guide (TIG) a resource for stakeholders to use to help standardize data for submission and facilitate tobacco product research and scientific review. Stay current on FDA's tobacco regulatory science and research efforts, tobacco scientific publications and study findings, and research grants by subscribing to CTP's quarterly Spotlight on Science newsletter.
Subscribe to Spotlight on Science
Studies involving administration of unauthorized tobacco products.
If you plan to study tobacco products that do not have marketing authorization or that do not comply with an applicable tobacco product standard, you may submit your proposed protocol to FDA for review. FDA intends to evaluate specific uses of investigational tobacco products on a case-by-case basis according to potential human subject protection concerns or other impacts on public health.
Using Investigational Tobacco Products
Investigators who are designing a protocol involving administration of a tobacco product to humans should review the information below regarding the need for submitting their protocol to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) for review.
Investigators are encouraged to work with tobacco product manufacturers to ensure availability of products to complete planned studies. FDA evaluates the specific uses of investigational tobacco products (ITPs) on a case-by-case basis according to potential human subject protection concerns or other impacts on public health. Generally, submission of protocols by industry and academic researchers for FDA review is a voluntary process; however, FDA will review all protocols submitted. FDA recommends submission of proposed use of ITPs to FDA for review only if the study design is more likely to raise concerns about human subject protection, public health, or both. As discussed by FDA in its February 2019 guidance, Use of Investigational Tobacco Products , factors to consider would be studies that plan to enroll vulnerable populations, particularly those < 21 years old, studies that involve significant increases over the participants’ usual exposure to nicotine, studies that modify the tobacco product in a manner different from that described by the manufacturer or study of a novel product for which there is limited experience and knowledge.
For all clinical studies involving use of ITPs, we recommend that you notify FDA, all participating clinical investigators, and any committee or group formally designated to oversee the study of any serious or unexpected adverse experience associated with the tobacco product you are investigating within a few weeks after initial notification, and that you supply FDA with a completed case report form for the adverse experience. We encourage the reporting of adverse experiences associated with a clinical investigation of an investigational tobacco product to FDA through the FDACTP Safety Reporting Portal for Researchers.
FDA is committed to furthering scientific research on tobacco products and has a major investment in regulatory science. If you plan to study tobacco products that do not have marketing authorization or that do not comply with an applicable tobacco product standard, you may submit your proposed protocol to FDA for review based on the criteria described above. FDA will review any protocols submitted and intends to evaluate specific uses of investigational tobacco products on a case-by-case basis according to potential human subject protection concerns or other impacts on public health. Generally, FDA does not recommend that investigators correspond with us about the use of investigational tobacco products in nonclinical studies as these are not ordinarily reviewed. You may refer to the draft guidance, Use of Investigational Tobacco Products , for more information regarding how to submit your proposed use of an investigational tobacco product and how FDA intends to make enforcement decisions regarding the use of investigational tobacco products.
FDA understands that investigators may choose to obtain tobacco products directly from a tobacco product manufacturer with the sole intent to use the products for research investigations without commercializing the products. In such cases, FDA recommends that investigators add language to all product labels to indicate that these products are limited to investigational use, that study participants be instructed that the products may not be further distributed, and that study protocols include a plan to collect and account for all investigational tobacco products after the study has concluded.
If there are additional questions, investigators should reach out to the FDA CTP at: [email protected].
The email should:
- Clearly and uniquely identify the product(s) you wish to study by brand and sub-brand—including the type or category of tobacco product (e.g., cigarette, smokeless tobacco, cigar, electronic nicotine delivery systems [ENDS], waterpipe tobacco) and subcategory (e.g., closed or open e-cigarette, closed or open e-liquid).
- Provide additional available information such as packaging type, package quantity, and/or characterizing flavor that may help answer the specific question(s)
Once the FDA CTP receives the email, they will make every effort to respond via email within 2weeks.
Note that the FDA CTP intends to respond to investigators within 60 days of receipt of protocols for review. Investigators should receive acknowledgement of the submission with the name and contact information for the assigned Regulatory Health Project Manager (RHPM). If investigators do not receive a response within 60 days, they should contact the RHPM. Investigators may also contact their NIH Program Officer to discuss additional steps/actions.
If the marketed products will be used with investigator-manipulated modification(s), then the investigator should submit an ITP request. In addition to the protocol and other information described in the FDA Draft Guidance, the ITP request should also include:
- A description of the planned modification(s).
- A rationale for how these modification(s) support the study design and do not increase risk to human participants.
Tobacco Researcher Interviews: Meet some of the people who lead tobacco research
![CTP - FDA Tobacco Researcher Interviews FDA Tobacco Researcher Interviews](https://www.fda.gov/files/tcors_researchers_4_223px.jpg)
![](http://nandemo.space/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Ongoing Research
- Read about the research goals of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study , a collaboration between FDA and NIH, as well as availability of Restricted Use Files (RUF) and Public Use Files (PUF) for Waves 1 & 2.
- Learn about CTP's research priorities that build the science base behind FDA's authority to regulate tobacco products.
- Find out more about the Tobacco Regulatory Science Program (TRSP), FDA's partnership with NIH to foster tobacco regulatory research, including the Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science (TCORS).
- Learn about FDA's collaboration with CDC on the National Youth Tobacco Survey .
- Review information on Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents .
- Understand more about Modified Risk Tobacco Products and the rigorous standards in place to protect the public's health.
Additional Resources
- Products, Ingredients and Components
- FDA's New Regulations for E-Cigarettes, Cigars, and All Other Tobacco Products
- FDA Safety Reporting Portal for Tobacco Products
- Connect with Us
- Tobacco Control Act
Stay current on tobacco regulatory science and research, tobacco scientific publications and study findings, CTP grants, and more in this quarterly newsletter.
- Fact sheets
- Facts in pictures
- Publications
- Questions and answers
- Tools and toolkits
- Endometriosis
- Excessive heat
- Mental disorders
- Polycystic ovary syndrome
- All countries
- Eastern Mediterranean
- South-East Asia
- Western Pacific
- Data by country
- Country presence
- Country strengthening
- Country cooperation strategies
- News releases
Feature stories
- Press conferences
- Commentaries
- Photo library
- Afghanistan
- Cholera
- Coronavirus disease (COVID-19)
- Greater Horn of Africa
- Israel and occupied Palestinian territory
- Disease Outbreak News
- Situation reports
- Weekly Epidemiological Record
- Surveillance
- Health emergency appeal
- International Health Regulations
- Independent Oversight and Advisory Committee
- Classifications
- Data collections
- Global Health Observatory
- Global Health Estimates
- Mortality Database
- Sustainable Development Goals
- Health Inequality Monitor
- Global Progress
- World Health Statistics
- Partnerships
- Committees and advisory groups
- Collaborating centres
- Technical teams
- Organizational structure
- Initiatives
- General Programme of Work
- WHO Academy
- Investment in WHO
- WHO Foundation
- External audit
- Financial statements
- Internal audit and investigations
- Programme Budget
- Results reports
- Governing bodies
- World Health Assembly
- Executive Board
- Member States Portal
- Health topics /
Nicotine contained in tobacco is highly addictive and tobacco use is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, over 20 different types or subtypes of cancer, and many other debilitating health conditions. Every year, more than 8 million people die from tobacco use. Most tobacco-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, which are often targets of intensive tobacco industry interference and marketing.
Tobacco can also be deadly for non-smokers. Second-hand smoke exposure has also been implicated in adverse health outcomes, causing 1.2 million deaths annually. Nearly half of all children breathe air polluted by tobacco smoke and 65 000 children die each year due to illnesses related to second-hand smoke. Smoking while pregnant can lead to several life-long health conditions for babies.
Heated tobacco products (HTPs) contain tobacco and expose users to toxic emissions, many of which cause cancer and are harmful to health. Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENNDS), commonly known as e-cigarettes, do not contain tobacco and may or may not contain nicotine, but are harmful to health and undoubtedly unsafe. However, it is too early to provide a clear answer on the long-term impact of HTPs and/or e-cigarette use.
An estimated 1.3 billion people worldwide use tobacco products, 80% of whom are in low- and middle-income countries. Tobacco use contributes to poverty by diverting household spending from basic needs, such as food and shelter, to tobacco. This spending behaviour is difficult to curb because tobacco is so addictive. It also causes premature death and disability of productive age adults in households thus leading to reduced household income and increased healthcare costs.
In addition to the detrimental impact of tobacco on health, the total economic cost of smoking (from health expenditures and productivity losses together) are estimated to be around US$ 1.4 trillion per year, equivalent in magnitude to 1.8% of the world's annual gross domestic product (GDP). Almost 40% of this cost occurred in developing countries, highlighting the substantial burden these countries suffer.
Tobacco taxes are applied in part to combat this effect and are seen as the most cost-effective way of curbing tobacco use, particularly among youth and low-income populations. A tax increase that increases tobacco prices by 10% decreases tobacco consumption by about 4% in high-income countries and about 5% in low- and middle-income countries.
The scale of this human and economic tragedy is shocking, but it’s also preventable. Big Tobacco — along with all manufacturers of tobacco products — is fighting to ensure the dangers of their products are concealed, but we are fighting back: In 2003, WHO Member States unanimously adopted the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC), the only public health treaty under the auspices of WHO. In force since 2005, it has currently 181 Parties.
To help countries implement the WHO FCTC, WHO introduced MPOWER, a package of technical measures and resources, each of which corresponds to at least one provision of the WHO FCTC. MPOWER builds the capacity of countries to implement 6 measures to reduce the demand for tobacco products: monitor tobacco use and prevention policies, protect people from tobacco use, offer help to quit tobacco use, warn about the dangers of tobacco, enforce bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship and raise taxes on tobacco.
- E-cigarettes
- Health benefits of smoking cessation
- The Global Health Observatory: Tobacco control
- Pictorial health warnings on tobacco products
- Tobacco cessation consortium
- Tobacco-free farms
- Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation (TobReg)
- Tobacco Laboratory Network (TobLabNet)
- WHA 56. (2003) WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
- WHA 42 (1989) Tobacco or health. (World No Tobacco Day resolution)
- Tobacco control
- Convention Secretariat WHO FCTC
WHO publishes new tobacco and asthma knowledge summary
WHO releases first-ever clinical treatment guideline for tobacco cessation in adults
WHO condemns tobacco industry's manipulation of medical education
UN-led Tobacco-Free Farms Initiative awarded UN Global Pulse award for scaling up
Latest publications
![tobacco topics research paper Tobacco and HIV](https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/378509/9789240096868-eng.pdf.jpg?sequence=4)
Tobacco and HIV
This document is the tenth in a series of Tobacco Knowledge Summaries and is prepared with the objective to summarize the current evidence on the association...
![tobacco topics research paper Tobacco and asthma](https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/378266/9789240097537-eng.pdf.jpg?sequence=6)
Tobacco and asthma
This document is the ninth in a series of Tobacco Knowledge Summaries and is prepared with the objective to summarize the current evidence on the association...
![tobacco topics research paper WHO clinical treatment guideline for tobacco cessation in adults](https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/377825/9789240096431-eng.pdf.jpg?sequence=6)
WHO clinical treatment guideline for tobacco cessation in adults
Supporting tobacco users to quit is core demand-reduction measure of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) and a key component of...
![tobacco topics research paper Hooking the next generation: how the tobacco industry captures young customers](https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/376853/9789240094642-eng.pdf.jpg?sequence=4)
Hooking the next generation: how the tobacco industry captures young customers
Young people across the world are urging governments to shield them from predatory tobacco marketing tactics. The industry targets youth for a lifetime...
![tobacco topics research paper tobacco topics research paper](https://cdn.who.int/media/images/default-source/tobacco/tobacco-product-regulation/technical-note-on-call-to-action-on-electronic-cigarettes-cover.tmb-144v.jpg?sfvrsn=a396b41b_2)
Technical note on the call to action on electronic cigarettes
The background information document on the call to action on electronic cigarettes is an accompanying document to call to action on electronic cigarettes...
![tobacco topics research paper Electronic cigarettes - call to action](https://cdn.who.int/media/images/default-source/tobacco/tobacco-product-regulation/ends-call-to-action.tmb-144v.jpg?sfvrsn=fc500cc_2)
Electronic cigarettes: call to action
This call to action on e-cigarettes notes that urgent and strong decisive action to prevent uptake of e-cigarettes, which are harmful to health, should...
![tobacco topics research paper tobacco topics research paper](https://www.who.int/images/default-source/thumbnails-global/quitting-toolkit-cover.tmb-144v.png?Culture=en&sfvrsn=12c5cd6a_1)
WHO Quitting Toolkit
Quitting tobacco and related products is hard, but with the right support and tools, you can do it! With professional support and quitting services, tobacco...
Enforcing tobacco advertising, promotion & sponsorship bans
Monitoring tobacco use
Protecting people from tobacco smoke
Quitting tobacco
Eight public health champions celebrated at the Seventy-seventh World Health Assembly
Sarah's journey: empowering women through high iron beans
Donors making a difference: healthier communities across Africa
Tobacco farmers switch to sustainable crops in Brazil
Infographics
![tobacco topics research paper Comprehensive smoke-free policies help babies and children survive and thrive](https://cdn.who.int/media/images/default-source/mca/child-health/chd-infographics/210304_bls21051_who_tobacco_sm3_v02.tmb-549v.png?sfvrsn=3904320c_2)
Comprehensive smoke-free policies help babies and children survive and thrive
![tobacco topics research paper Globally, 62 countries have adopted comprehensive smoke free policies](https://cdn.who.int/media/images/default-source/mca/child-health/chd-infographics/globally-62-countries-have-adopted-comprehensive-smoke-free-policies.tmb-549v.png?sfvrsn=9616b76a_2)
Globally, 62 countries have adopted comprehensive smoke-free policies
![tobacco topics research paper Smoke-free environments save children's lives](https://cdn.who.int/media/images/default-source/mca/child-health/chd-infographics/210304_bls21051_who_tobacco_sm1_v02-(1).tmb-549v.png?sfvrsn=9aaa9ba7_2)
Smoke-free environments save children's lives
![tobacco topics research paper A 'smoke-free generation' is in our reach](https://cdn.who.int/media/images/default-source/mca/child-health/chd-infographics/210304_bls21051_who_tobacco_sm4_v02856f9bd9-86e2-4e5c-a82b-5a59cd9787c8.tmb-549v.png?sfvrsn=6f28cd9e_2)
A 'smoke-free generation' is in our reach
![tobacco topics research paper World No Tobacco Day 2024: Youth step in and speak out #TobaccoExposed](https://cdn.who.int/media/images/default-source/who-campaigns/world-no-tobacco-day-2024/wntd-2024-video-image.tmb-549v.jpg?sfvrsn=66ab404f_4)
World No Tobacco Day 2024: Youth step in and speak out #TobaccoExposed
![tobacco topics research paper](https://cdn.who.int/media/images/default-source/tobacco/tobacco-exposed/who_stop_the_lies_youtube_video_thumbnail.tmb-549v.jpg?sfvrsn=1615ab67_1)
Tobacco industry lies
![tobacco topics research paper WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2023](https://cdn.who.int/media/images/default-source/tobacco/protect-tobacco-smoke.tmb-549v.jpg?sfvrsn=5b88123a_1)
Protect people from second-hand smoke
![tobacco topics research paper MPOWER](https://cdn.who.int/media/images/default-source/tobacco/mpower.tmb-549v.png?sfvrsn=8e6ebca6_1)
Tobacco control measures: the MPOWER technical package by WHO
![Graphic for World No Tobacco Day 2024 Poster showing a young woman pulling back pink paper with e-cigarette graphics printed on it to expose a girl with an oxygen mask over her mouth](https://cdn.who.int/media/images/default-source/who-campaigns/world-no-tobacco-day-2024/banner-image-resized.jpg?sfvrsn=17e2b86b_19)
Webinar: From knowledge to action: addressing tobacco cessation in chronic respiratory diseases
Webinar series: Regulating digital marketing of tobacco, alcohol, food and non-alcoholic beverages and breast-milk substitutes
World No Tobacco Day 2024 - Protecting children from tobacco industry interference
Country profiles
Related health topics
Cardiovascular diseases
Health promotion
Noncommunicable diseases
Oral health
235 Smoking Essay Topics & Examples
Looking for smoking essay topics? Being one of the most serious psychological and social issues, smoking is definitely worth writing about.
🏆 Best Smoking Essay Examples & Topic Ideas
🥇 good titles for smoking essay, 👍 best titles for research paper about smoking, ⭐ simple & easy health essay titles, 💡 interesting topics to write about health, ❓ essay questions about smoking.
In your essay about smoking, you might want to focus on its causes and effects or discuss why smoking is a dangerous habit. Other options are to talk about smoking prevention or to concentrate on the reasons why it is so difficult to stop smoking. Here we’ve gathered a range of catchy titles for research papers about smoking together with smoking essay examples. Get inspired with us!
Smoking is a well-known source of harm yet popular regardless, and so smoking essays should cover various aspects of the topic to identify the reasons behind the trend.
You will want to discuss the causes and effects of smoking and how they contributed to the persistent refusal of large parts of the population to abandon the habit, even if they are aware of the dangers of cigarettes. You should provide examples of how one may become addicted to tobacco and give the rationales for smokers.
You should also discuss the various consequences of cigarette use, such as lung cancer, and identify their relationship with the habit. By discussing both sides of the issue, you will be able to write an excellent essay.
Reasons why one may begin smoking, are among the most prominent smoking essay topics. It is not easy to begin to enjoy the habit, as the act of smoke inhalation can be difficult to control due to a lack of experience and unfamiliarity with the concept.
As such, people have to be convinced that the habit deserves consideration by various ideas or influences. The notion that “smoking is cool” among teenagers can contribute to the adoption of the trait, as can peer pressure.
If you can find polls and statistics on the primary factors that lead people to tweet, they will be helpful to your point. Factual data will identify the importance of each cause clearly, although you should be careful about bias.
The harmful effects of tobacco have been researched considerably more, with a large body of medical studies investigating the issue available to anyone.
Lung cancer is the foremost issue in the public mind because of the general worry associated with the condition and its often incurable nature, but smoking can lead to other severe illnesses.
Heart conditions remain a prominent consideration due to their lethal effects, and strokes or asthma deserve significant consideration, as well. Overall, smoking has few to no beneficial health effects but puts the user at risk of a variety of concerns.
As such, people should eventually quit once their health declines, but their refusal to do so deserves a separate investigation and can provide many interesting smoking essay titles.
One of the most prominent reasons why a person would continue smoking despite all the evidence of its dangers and the informational campaigns carried out to inform consumers is nicotine addiction.
The substance is capable of causing dependency, a trait that has led to numerous discussions of the lawfulness of the current state of cigarettes.
It is also among the most dangerous aspects of smoking, a fact you should mention.
Lastly, you can discuss the topics of alternatives to smoking in your smoking essay bodies, such as e-cigarettes, hookahs, and vapes, all of which still contain nicotine and can, therefore, lead to considerable harm. You may also want to discuss safe cigarette avoidance options and their issues.
Here are some additional tips for your essay:
- Dependency is not the sole factor in cigarette consumption, and many make the choice that you should respect consciously.
- Cite the latest medical research titles, as some past claims have been debunked and are no longer valid.
- Mortality is not the sole indicator of the issues associated with smoking, and you should take chronic conditions into consideration.
Find smoking essay samples and other useful paper samples on IvyPanda, where we have a collection of professionally written materials!
- How Smoking Is Harmful to Your Health The primary purpose of the present speech is to inform the audience about the detrimental effects of smoking. The first system of the human body that suffers from cigarettes is the cardiovascular system.
- Conclusion of Smoking Should Be Banned on College Campuses Essay However, it is hard to impose such a ban in some colleges because of the mixed reactions that are held by different stakeholders about the issue of smoking, and the existing campus policies which give […]
- Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places? Besides, smoking is an environmental hazard as much of the content in the cigarette contains chemicals and hydrocarbons that are considered to be dangerous to both life and environment.
- Smoking: Problems and Solutions To solve the problem, I would impose laws that restrict adults from smoking in the presence of children. In recognition of the problems that tobacco causes in the country, The Canadian government has taken steps […]
- Should Cigarettes Be Banned? Essay Banning cigarette smoking would be of great benefit to the young people. Banning of cigarette smoking would therefore reduce stress levels in people.
- Advertisements on the Effect of Smoking Do not Smoke” the campaign was meant to discourage the act of smoking among the youngsters, and to encourage them to think beyond and see the repercussions of smoking.
- Smoking Cigarette Should Be Banned Ban on tobacco smoking has resulted to a decline in the number of smokers as the world is sensitized on the consequences incurred on 31st May.
- Causes and Effects of Smoking Some people continue smoking as a result of the psychological addiction that is associated with nicotine that is present in cigarettes.
- Quitting Smoking: Strategies and Consequences Thus, for the world to realize a common positive improvement in population health, people must know the consequences of smoking not only for the smoker but also the society. The first step towards quitting smoking […]
- Smoking and Its Effects on Human Body The investigators explain the effects of smoking on the breath as follows: the rapid pulse rate of smokers decreases the stroke volume during rest since the venous return is not affected and the ventricles lose […]
- Hookah Smoking and Its Risks The third component of a hookah is the hose. This is located at the bottom of the hookah and acts as a base.
- On Why One Should Stop Smoking Thesis and preview: today I am privileged to have your audience and I intend to talk to you about the effects of smoking, and also I propose to give a talk on how to solve […]
- “Thank You For Smoking” by Jason Reitman Film Analysis Despite the fact that by the end of the film the character changes his job, his nature remains the same: he believes himself to be born to talk and convince people.
- Teenage Smoking and Solution to This Problem Overall, the attempts made by anti-smoking campaigners hardly yield any results, because they mostly focus on harmfulness of tobacco smoking and the publics’ awareness of the problem, itself, but they do not eradicate the underlying […]
- Peer Pressure and Smoking Influence on Teenagers The study results indicate that teenagers understand the health and social implications of smoking, but peer pressure contributes to the activity’s uptake.
- Smoking and Its Negative Effects on Human Beings Therefore, people need to be made aware of dental and other health problems they are likely to experience as a result of smoking.
- Smoking Cessation and Patient Education in Nursing Pack-years are the concept that is used to determine the health risks of a smoking patient. The most important step in the management plan is to determine a date when the man should quit smoking.
- Ban of Tobacco Smoking in Jamaica The first part of the paper will address effects of tobacco smoking on personal health and the economy. Cognizant of its international obligation and the aforementioned health effects of tobacco smoke, Jamaica enacted a law […]
- Smoking Among Teenagers as Highlighted in Articles The use of tobacco through smoking is a trend among adolescents and teenagers with the number of young people who involve themselves in smoking is growing each day.
- Aspects of Anti-Smoking Advertising Thus, it is safe to say that the authors’ main and intended audience is the creators of anti-smoking public health advertisements.
- Health Care Costs for Smokers Higher Tobacco taxes Some of the smokers have the same viewpoint that the current level of taxes imposed on the tobacco is high, 68%, and most of them, 59%, are in agreement for the increase […]
- Smoking: Effects, Reasons and Solutions This presentation provides harmful health effects of smoking, reasons for smoking, and solutions to smoking. Combination therapy that engages the drug Zyban, the concurrent using of NRT and counseling of smokers under smoking cessation program […]
- Cigarette Smoking in Public Places Those who argue against the idea of banning the smoking are of the opinion that some of them opt to smoke due to the stress that they acquire at their work places.
- The Change of my Smoking Behavior With the above understanding of my social class and peer friends, I was able to create a plan to avoid them in the instances that they were smoking.
- Health Promotion for Smokers The purpose of this paper is to show the negative health complications that stem from tobacco use, more specifically coronary heart disease, and how the health belief model can help healthcare professionals emphasize the importance […]
- Gender-Based Assessment of Cigarette Smoking Harm Thus, the following hypothesis is tested: Women are more likely than men to believe that smoking is more harmful to health.
- Hazards of Smoking and Benefits of Cessation Prabhat Jha is the author of the article “The Hazards of Smoking and the Benefits of Cessation,” published in a not-for-profit scientific journal, eLife, in 2020.
- The Impact of Warning Labels on Cigarette Smoking The regulations requiring tobacco companies to include warning labels are founded on the need to reduce nicotine intake, limit cigarette dependence, and mitigate the adverse effects associated with addiction to smoking.
- Psilocybin as a Smoking Addiction Remedy Additionally, the biotech company hopes to seek approval from FDA for psilocybin-based therapy treatment as a cigarette smoking addiction long-term remedy.
- Investing Savings from Quitting Smoking: A Financial Analysis The progression of interest is approximately $50 per year, and if we assume n equal to 45 using the formula of the first n-terms of the arithmetic progression, then it comes out to about 105 […]
- Smoking as a Community Issue: The Influence of Smoking A review of the literature shows the use of tobacco declined between 1980 and 2012, but the number of people using tobacco in the world is increasing because of the rise in the global population.
- Smoking Public Education Campaign Assessment The major influence of the real cost campaign was to prevent the initiation of smoking among the youth and prevent the prevalence of lifelong smokers.
- Quitting Smoking and Related Health Benefits The regeneration of the lungs will begin: the process will touch the cells called acini, from which the mucous membrane is built. Therefore, quitting the habit of smoking a person can radically change his life […]
- Smoking and Stress Among Veterans The topic is significant to explore because of the misconception that smoking can alleviate the emotional burden of stress and anxiety when in reality, it has an exacerbating effect on emotional stress.
- Smoking as a Predictor of Underachievement By comparing two groups smoking and non-smoking adolescents through a parametric t-test, it is possible to examine this assumption and draw conclusions based on the resulting p-value.
- Smoking and the Pandemic in West Virginia In this case, the use of the income variable is an additional facet of the hypothesis described, allowing us to evaluate whether there is any divergence in trends between the rich and the poor.
- Anti-Smoking Policy in Australia and the US The anti-smoking policy is to discourage people from smoking through various means and promotion of a healthy lifestyle, as well as to prevent the spread of the desire to smoke.
- Smoking Prevalence in Bankstown, Australia The secondary objective of the project was to gather and analyze a sufficient amount of auxiliary scholarly sources on smoking cessation initiatives and smoking prevalence in Australia.
- Drug Addiction in Teenagers: Smoking and Other Lifestyles In the first part of this assignment, the health problem of drug addiction was considered among teens and the most vulnerable group was established.
- Anti-Smoking Communication Campaign’s Analysis Defining the target audience for an anti-smoking campaign is complicated by the different layers of adherence to the issue of the general audience of young adults.
- Smoking Cessation Project Implementation In addition, the review will include the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence presented in the literature while identifying gaps and limitations.
- Smoking Cessation and Health Promotion Plan Patients addicted to tobacco are one of the major concerns of up-to-date medicine as constant nicotine intake leads to various disorders and worsens the health state and life quality of the users.
- Maternal and Infant Health: Smoking Prevention Strategies It is known that many women know the dangers of smoking when pregnant and they always try to quit smoking to protect the lives of themselves and the child.
- A Peer Intervention Program to Reduce Smoking Rates Among LGBTQ Therefore, the presumed results of the project are its introduction into the health care system, which will promote a healthy lifestyle and diminish the level of smoking among LGBTQ people in the SESLHD.
- Smoking Cessation Programs Through the Wheel of Community Organizing The first step of the wheel is to listen to the community’s members and trying to understand their needs. After the organizer and the person receiving treatment make the connection, they need to understand how […]
- Smoking: Benefits or Harms? Hundreds of smokers every day are looking for a way to get rid of the noose, which is a yoke around the neck, a cigarette.
- The Culture of Smoking Changed in Poland In the 1980-90s, Poland faced the challenge of being a country with the highest rates of smoking, associated lung cancer, and premature mortality in the world.
- The Stop Smoking Movement Analysis The paper discusses the ideology, objective, characteristics, context, special techniques, organization culture, target audience, media strategies, audience reaction, counter-propaganda and the effectiveness of the “Stop Smoking” Movement.”The Stop Smoking” campaign is a prevalent example of […]
- Health Promotion Plan: Smokers in Mississippi The main strategies of the training session are to reduce the number of smokers in Mississippi, conduct a training program on the dangers of smoking and work with tobacco producers.
- Smoking Health Problem Assessment The effects of smoking correlate starkly with the symptoms and diseases in the nursing practice, working as evidence of the smoking’s impact on human health.
- Integration of Smoking Cessation Into Daily Nursing Practice Generally, smoking cessation refers to a process structured to help a person to discontinue inhaling smoked substances. It can also be referred to as quitting smoking.
- E-Cigarettes and Smoking Cessation Many people argue that e-cigarettes do not produce secondhand smoke. They believe that the e-fluids contained in such cigarettes produce vapor and not smoke.
- Introducing Smoking Cessation Program: 5 A’s Intervention Plan The second problem arises in an attempt to solve the issue of the lack of counseling in the unit by referring patients to the outpatient counseling center post-hospital discharge to continue the cessation program.
- Outdoor Smoking Ban in Public Areas of the Community These statistics have contributed to the widespread efforts to educate the public regarding the need to quit smoking. However, most of the chronic smokers ignore the ramifications of the habit despite the deterioration of their […]
- Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Adult Smokers With a Psychiatric Disorder The qualitative research methodology underlines the issue of the lack of relevant findings in the field of nicotine replacement therapy in people and the necessity of treatment, especially in the early stages of implementation.
- Smoking and Drinking: Age Factor in the US As smoking and drinking behavior were both strongly related to age, it could be the case that the observed relationship is due to the fact that older pupils were more likely to smoke and drink […]
- Smoking Cessation Clinic Analysis The main aim of this project is to establish a smoking cessation clinic that will guide smoker through the process of quitting smoking.
- Cigarette Smoking Among Teenagers in the Baltimore Community, Maryland The paper uses the Baltimore community in Maryland as the area to focus the event of creating awareness of cigarette smoking among the teens of this community.
- Advocating for Smoking Cessation: Health Professional Role Health professionals can contribute significantly to tobacco control in Australia and the health of the community by providing opportunities for smoking patients to quit smoking.
- Lifestyle Management While Quitting Smoking Realistically, not all of the set goals can be achieved; this is due to laxity in implementing them and the associated difficulty in letting go of the past lifestyle.
- Smoking in the Actuality The current use of aggressive marketing and advertising strategies has continued to support the smoking of e-cigarettes. The study has also indicated that “the use of such e-cigarettes may contribute to the normalization of smoking”.
- Analysis of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act The law ensures that the FDA has the power to tackle issues of interest to the public such as the use of tobacco by minors.
- “50-Year Trends in Smoking-Related Mortality in the United States” by Thun et al. Thun is affiliated with the American Cancer Society, but his research interests cover several areas. Carter is affiliated with the American Cancer Society, Epidemiology Research Program.
- Pulmonology: Emphysema Caused by Smoking The further development of emphysema in CH can lead to such complications caused by described pathological processes as pneumothorax that is associated with the air surrounding the lungs.
- Smoking and Lung Cancer Among African Americans Primarily, the research paper provides insight on the significance of the issue to the African Americans and the community health nurses.
- Health Promotion and Smoking Cessation I will also complete a wide range of activities in an attempt to support the agency’s goals. As well, new studies will be conducted in order to support the proposed programs.
- Maternal Mental Health and Prenatal Smoking It was important to determine the variables that may lead to postpartum relapse or a relapse during the period of pregnancy. It is important to note that the findings are also consistent with the popular […]
- Nursing Interventions for Smoking Cessation For instance, the authors are able to recognize the need to classify the level of intensity in respect to the intervention that is employed by nurses towards smoking cessation.
- Smoking and Cancer in the United States In this research study, data on tobacco smoking and cancer prevalence in the United States was used to determine whether cancer in the United States is related to tobacco smoking tobacco.
- Marketing Plan: Creating a Smoking Cessation Program for Newton Healthcare Center The fourth objective is to integrate a smoking cessation program that covers the diagnosis of smoking, counseling of smokers, and patient care system to help the smokers quit their smoking habits. The comprehensive healthcare needs […]
- Risks of Smoking Cigarettes Among Preteens Despite the good news that the number of preteen smokers has been significantly reducing since the 1990s, there is still much to be done as the effects of smoking are increasingly building an unhealthy population […]
- Public Health Education: Anti-smoking Project The workshop initiative aimed to achieve the following objectives: To assess the issues related to smoking and tobacco use. To enhance the health advantages of clean air spaces.
- Healthy People Program: Smoking Issue in Wisconsin That is why to respond to the program’s effective realization, it is important to discuss the particular features of the target population in the definite community of Wisconsin; to focus on the community-based response to […]
- Health Campaign: Smoking in the USA and How to Reduce It That is why, the government is oriented to complete such objectives associated with the tobacco use within the nation as the reduction of tobacco use by adults and adolescents, reduction of initiation of tobacco use […]
- Smoking Differentials Across Social Classes The author inferred her affirmations from the participant’s words and therefore came to the right conclusion; that low income workers had the least justification for smoking and therefore took on a passive approach to their […]
- Cigarette Smoking Side Effects Nicotine is a highly venomous and addictive substance absorbed through the mucous membrane in the mouth as well as alveoli in the lungs.
- Long-Term Effects of Smoking The difference between passive smoking and active smoking lies in the fact that, the former involves the exposure of people to environmental tobacco smoke while the latter involves people who smoke directly.
- Smoking Cessation Program Evaluation in Dubai The most important program of this campaign is the Quit and Win campaign, which is a unique idea, launched by the DHCC and is in the form of an open contest.
- Preterm Birth and Maternal Smoking in Pregnancy The major finding of the discussed research is that both preterm birth and maternal smoking during pregnancy contribute, although independently, to the aortic narrowing of adolescents.
- Enforcement of Michigan’s Non-Smoking Law This paper is aimed at identifying a plan and strategy for the enforcement of the Michigan non-smoking law that has recently been signed by the governor of this state.
- Smoking Cessation for Patients With Cardio Disorders It highlights the key role of nurses in the success of such programs and the importance of their awareness and initiative in determining prognosis.
- Legalizing Electronic Vaping as the Means of Curbing the Rates of Smoking However, due to significantly less harmful effects that vaping produces on health and physical development, I can be considered a legitimate solution to reducing the levels of smoking, which is why it needs to be […]
- Inequality and Discrimination: Impact on LGBTQ+ High School Students Consequently, the inequality and discrimination against LGBTQ + students in high school harm their mental, emotional, and physical health due to the high level of stress and abuse of various substances that it causes.
- Self-Efficacy and Smoking Urges in Homeless Individuals Pinsker et al.point out that the levels of self-efficacy and the severity of smoking urges change significantly during the smoking cessation treatment.
- “Cigarette Smoking: An Overview” by Ellen Bailey and Nancy Sprague The authors of the article mentioned above have presented a fair argument about the effects of cigarette smoking and debate on banning the production and use of tobacco in America.
- “The Smoking Plant” Project: Artist Statement It is the case when the art is used to pass the important message to the observer. The live cigarette may symbolize the smokers while the plant is used to denote those who do not […]
- Dangers of Smoking While Pregnant In this respect, T-test results show that mean birthweight of baby of the non-smoking mother is 3647 grams, while the birthweight of smoking mother is 3373 grams. Results show that gestation value and smoking habit […]
- The Cultural Differences of the Tobacco Smoking The Middle East culture is connected to the hookah, the Native American cultures use pipes, and the Canadian culture is linked to cigarettes.
- Ban on Smoking in Enclosed Public Places in Scotland The theory of externality explains the benefit or cost incurred by a third party who was not a party to the reasoning behind the benefit or cost. This will also lead to offer of a […]
- How Smoking Cigarettes Effects Your Health Cigarette smoking largely aggravates the condition of the heart and the lung. In addition, the presence of nicotine makes the blood to be sticky and thick leading to damage to the lining of the blood […]
- Alcohol and Smoking Abuse: Negative Physical and Mental Effects The following is a range of effects of heavy alcohol intake as shown by Lacoste, they include: Neuropsychiatric or neurological impairment, cardiovascular, disease, liver disease, and neoplasm that is malevolent.
- Smoking Prohibition: Local Issues, Personal Views This is due to the weakening of blood vessels in the penis. For example, death rate due to smoking is higher in Kentucky than in other parts of the country.
- Ban Smoking in Cars Out of this need, several regulations have been put in place to ensure children’s safety in vehicles is guaranteed; thus, protection from second-hand smoke is an obvious measure that is directed towards the overall safety […]
- Smoking: Causes and Effects Considering the peculiarities of a habit and of a disease, smoking can be considered as a habit rather than a disease.
- Smoking and Its Effect on the Brain Since the output of the brain is behavior and thoughts, dysfunction of the brain may result in highly complex behavioral symptoms. The work of neurons is to transmit information and coordinate messengers in the brain […]
- Smoking Causes and Plausible Arguments In writing on the cause and effect of smoking we will examine the issue from the point of view of temporal precedence, covariation of the cause and effect and the explanations in regard to no […]
- Summary of “Smokers Get a Raw Deal” by Stanley Scott Lafayette explains that people who make laws and influence other people to exercise these laws are obviously at the top of the ladder and should be able to understand the difference between the harm sugar […]
- Smoking Qualitative Research: Critical Analysis Qualitative research allows researchers to explore a wide array of dimensions of the social world, including the texture and weave of everyday life, the understandings, experiences and imaginings of our research participants, the way that […]
- Motivational Interviewing as a Smoking Cessation Intervention for Patients With Cancer The dependent variable is the cessation of smoking in 3 months of the interventions. The study is based on the author’s belief that cessation of smoking influences cancer-treated patients by improving the efficacy of treatment.
- Factors Affecting the Success in Quitting Smoking of Smokers in West Perth, WA Australia Causing a wide array of diseases, health smoking is the second cause of death in the world. In Australia, the problem of smoking is extremely burning due to the high rates of diseases and deaths […]
- Media Effects on Teen Smoking But that is not how an adult human brain works, let alone the young and impressionable minds of teenagers, usually the ads targeted at the youth always play upon elements that are familiar and appealing […]
- Partnership in Working About Smoking and Tobacco Use The study related to smoking and tobacco use, which is one of the problematic areas in terms of the health of the population.
- Causes and Effects of Smoking in Public The research has further indicated that the carcinogens are in higher concentrations in the second hand smoke rather than in the mainstream smoke which makes it more harmful for people to smoke publicly.
- Quitting Smoking: Motivation and Brain As these are some of the observed motivations for smoking, quitting smoking is actually very easy in the sense that you just have to set your mind on quitting smoking.
- Health Effects of Tobacco Smoking in Hispanic Men The Health Effects of Tobacco Smoking can be attributed to active tobacco smoking rather than inhalation of tobacco smoke from environment and passive smoking.
- Smoking in Adolescents: A New Threat to the Society Of the newer concerns about the risks of smoking and the increase in its prevalence, the most disturbing is the increase in the incidences of smoking among the adolescents around the world.
- Smoking and Youth Culture in Germany The report also assailed the Federal Government for siding the interest of the cigarette industry instead of the health of the citizens.
- New Jersey Legislation on Smoking The advantages and disadvantages of the legislation were discussed in this case because of the complexity of the topic at hand as well as the potential effects of the solution on the sphere of public […]
- Environmental Health: Tabaco Smoking and an Increased Concentration of Carbon Monoxide The small size of the town, which is around 225000 people, is one of the reasons for high statistics in diseases of heart rate.
- Advanced Pharmacology: Birth Control for Smokers The rationale for IUD is the possibility to control birth without the partner’s participation and the necessity to visit a doctor just once for the device to be implanted.
- Legislation Reform of Public Smoking Therefore, the benefit of the bill is that the health hazard will be decreased using banning smoking in public parks and beaches.
- Smoking Bans: Protecting the Public and the Children of Smokers The purpose of the article is to show why smoking bans aim at protecting the public and the children of smokers.
- Clinical Effects of Cigarette Smoking Smoking is a practice that should be avoided or controlled rigorously since it is a risk factor for diseases such as cancer, affects the health outcomes of direct and passive cigarette users, children, and pregnant […]
- Public Health and Smoking Prevention Smoking among adults over 18 years old is a public health issue that requires intervention due to statistical evidence of its effects over the past decades.
- Smoking Should Be Banned Internationally The questions refer to the knowledge concerning the consequences of smoking and the opinions on smoking bans. 80 % of respondents agree that smoking is among the leading causes of death and 63, 3 % […]
- Microeconomics: Cigarette Taxes and Public Smoking Ban The problem of passive smoking will be minimized when the number of smokers decreases. It is agreeable that the meager incomes of such families will be used to purchase cigarettes.
- Tobacco Debates in “Thank You for Smoking” The advantage of Nick’s strategy is that it offers the consumer a role model to follow: if smoking is considered to be ‘cool’, more people, especially young ones, will try to become ‘cool’ using cigarettes.
- Alcohol and Smoking Impact on Cancer Risk The research question is to determine the quantity of the impact that different levels of alcohol ingestion combined with smoking behavioral patterns make on men and women in terms of the risks of cancer.
- Indoor Smoking Restriction Effects at the Workplace Regrettably, they have neglected research on the effect of the legislation on the employees and employers. In this research, the target population will be the employees and employers of various companies.
- Hypnotherapy Session for Smoking Cessation When I reached the age of sixty, I realized that I no longer wanted to be a smoker who was unable to take control of one’s lifestyle.
- Social Marketing: The Truth Anti-Smoking Campaign The agreement of November 1998 between 46 states, five territories of the United States, the District of Columbia, and representatives of the tobacco industry gave start to the introduction of the Truth campaign.
- Smoking Experience and Hidden Dangers When my best college friend Jane started smoking, my eyes opened on the complex nature of the problem and on the multiple negative effects of smoking both on the smoker and on the surrounding society.
- South Illinois University’s Smoking Ban Benefits The purpose of this letter is to assess the possible benefits of the plan and provide an analysis of the costs and consequences of the smoking ban introduction.
- Smoking Cessation in Patients With COPD The strategy of assessing these papers to determine their usefulness in EBP should include these characteristics, the overall quality of the findings, and their applicability in a particular situation. The following article is a study […]
- Smoking Bans: Preventive Measures There have been several public smoking bans that have proved to be promising since the issue of smoking prohibits smoking in all public places. This means it is a way of reducing the exposure to […]
- Ban Smoking Near the Child: Issues of Morality The decision to ban smoking near the child on father’s request is one of the demonstrative examples. The father’s appeal to the Supreme Court of California with the requirement to prohibit his ex-wife from smoking […]
- The Smoking Ban: Arguments Comparison The first argument against banning smoking employs the idea that smoking in specially designated areas cannot do harm to the health of non-smokers as the latter are supposed to avoid these areas.
- Philip Morris Company’s Smoking Prevention Activity Philip Morris admits the existence of scientific proof that smoking leads to lung cancer in addition to other severe illnesses even after years of disputing such findings from health professionals.
- Tobacco Smoking and Its Dangers Sufficient evidence also indicates that smoking is correlated with alcohol use and that it is capable of affecting one’s mental state to the point of heightening the risks of development of disorders.
- Virginia Slims’ Impact on Female Smokers’ Number Considering this, through the investigation of Philip Morris’ mission which it pursued during the launch of the Virginia Slims campaign in 1968-1970 and the main regulatory actions undertaken by the Congress during this period, the […]
- Tuberculosis Statistics Among Cigarette Smokers The proposal outlines the statistical applications of one-way ANOVA, the study participants, the variables, study methods, expected results and biases, and the practical significance of the expected results.
- Smoking Habit, Its Causes and Effects Smoking is one of the factors that are considered the leading causes of several health problems in the current society. Smoking is a habit that may be easy to start, but getting out of this […]
- Smoking Ban and UK’s Beer Industry However, there is an intricate type of relationship between the UK beer sector, the smoking ban, and the authorities that one can only understand by going through the study in detail The history of smoking […]
- Smokers’ Campaign: Finding a Home for Ciggy Butts When carrying out the campaign, it is important to know what the situation on the ground is to be able to address the root cause of the problem facing the population.
- Mobile Applications to Quit Smoking A critical insight that can be gleaned from the said report is that one of the major factors linked to failure is the fact that smokers were unable to quit the habit on their own […]
- Behavior Modification Technique: Smoking Cessation Some of its advantages include: its mode of application is in a way similar to the act of smoking and it has very few side effects.
- Effects of Thought Suppression on Smoking Behavior In the article under analysis called I suppress, Therefore I smoke: Effects of Thought Suppression on Smoking Behavior, the authors dedicate their study to the evaluation of human behavior as well as the influence of […]
- Smoking Cessation Methods These methods are a part of NRT or nicotine replacement therapy, they work according to the principle of providing the smoker with small portions of nicotine to minimize the addiction gradually and at the same […]
- Understanding Advertising: Second-Hand Smoking The image of the boy caught by the smoke is in the center of the picture, and it is in contrast with the deep black background.
- People Should Quit Smoking Other counseling strategies such as telephone calls and social support also serves the ultimate goal of providing a modern approach in which counseling can be tailored to suit the counseling needs of an individual smoker. […]
- Importance of Quitting Smoking As such, quitting smoking is important since it helps relief the worry and the fear associated with possibility of developing cancer among other smoking-related illnesses. It is therefore important to quit smoking if the problems […]
- Anti-Smoking Campaign in Canada This is not the first attempt that the federal government of Canada intends to make in reducing the prevalence of smoking in the country.
- Electronic Cigarettes: Could They Help University Students Give Smoking Up? Electronic Cigarettes An electronic cigarette is an electronic device that simulates the act of smoking by producing a mist which gives the physical sensation and often the flavor and the nicotine just as the analog […]
- Psychosocial Smoking Rehabilitation According to Getsios and Marton most of the economic models that evaluate the effects of smoke quitting rehabilitation consider the influence of a single quit attempt.
- Combating Smoking: Taxation Policies vs. Education Policies This is a considerable provision in the realms of health; hence, the efforts created by the government to curb this trend should be supported fully. In this regard, there is need to reduce the mentioned […]
- The Program to Quit Smoking The second stage of the evaluation proves revealed the benefits of the program for the hospital in terms of discount rates for employees, age categories involved in the program. This process consists in selection of […]
- Smoking Culture in Society Smoking culture refers to the practice of smoking tobacco by people in the society for the sheer satisfaction and delight it offers.
- Possible Smoking Policies in Florida Majority also think that went it comes to workplaces hotels and bars it would be more appropriate to provide specific smoking zones as opposed to total bans The implications of the policy adopted therefore affect […]
- Smoking Ban in the State of Florida These are the Total Ban Policy, the Partial Ban policy and the Liberated Smoking policy. The policy is authoritarian and ignores the interests of the smokers.
- Core Functions of Public Health in the Context of Smoking and Heart Disease In the relation to our problem, heart attacks and smoking, it is important to gather the information devoted to the number of people who suffered from heart attacks and indicate the percentage rate of those […]
- Putting Out the Fires: Will Higher Taxes Reduce the Onset of Youth Smoking? According to the article under consideration, increase in price of cigarettes can positively or negatively affect the rate of smoking among the youth.
- Smoking Bans in US The issue of whether to ban smoking indoors by the governments of various countries is popular as they try to take a step towards curbing the harmful effects of smoking.
- Smoking as Activity Enhancer: Schizophrenia and Gender Once learning the effects which nicotine has on people’s health and the relation between gender and schizophrenia, one can possibly find the ways to prevent the latter and to protect the people in the high-risk […]
- Medical Coverage for Smoking Related Diseases However, one of the most oblivious reasons is that it is a deterrent to this behavior, which is harmful to the life of the smoker.
- Exposure to mass media proliferate smoking The chronological array of events in the study with actual days of research and findings, prints out reality and easily enable the readers to connect the subjects of the study with the actual events that […]
- The Realm of reality: Smoking In a nutshell, it can be argued that the definition of a man or a woman is different and not the same as in earlier days.
- Ethical Problem of Smoking Since the job is urgent and therefore needed in a few days time, I would request her to work on the job with the promise that I will communicate her complaints to Frank and Alice […]
- The Rate of Smoking Among HIV Positive Cases. To determine if use of group work among HIV positive smokers will be an effective strategy in reducing smoking habit among the target cases, then it is essential that this study establish if use of […]
- Studying the Government’s Anti-Smoking Measures The methodology of study includes the review of the articles devoted to the anti-smoking measures of the Federal Government and application of economic theories to them.
- Smoking Should Be Banned In the United States For numerous decades, smoking has remained the most disastrous problem in the universe in spite of the full awareness of the risk accompanied with its use.
- Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Theory on Smoking Cessation
- Effectiveness of the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Smoking Cessation
- Wayco Company’s Non-smoking Policy
- Adverse Aspects of Smoking
- Negative Impacts of Smoking on Individuals and Society
- Cannabis Smoking in Canada
- Smoking Ban in the United States of America
- Dangers of Smoking Campaign
- Smoking Ban in New York
- Smoking and Adolescents
- Trends in Smoking Prevalence by Race/Ethnicity
- Business Ethics: Smoking Issue
- Should Smoking Tobacco Be Classified As an Illegal Drug?
- Where Does the Path to Smoking Addiction Start?
- Public Health Communication: Quit Smoking
- Are Estimated Peer Effects on Smoking Robust?
- Are There Safe Smoking and Tobacco Options?
- What Are the Health Risks of Smoking?
- Does Cigarette Smoking Affect Body Weight?
- Does Cigarette Smuggling Prop Up Smoking Rates?
- What Foods Help You Quit Smoking?
- How Can People Relax Without Smoking?
- Does Education Affect Smoking Behaviors?
- Is Vaping Worse Than Smoking?
- Do Movies Affect Teen Smoking?
- What Is Worse: Drinking or Smoking?
- Does Smoking Affect Breathing Capacity?
- Does Smoking Cause Lung Cancer?
- Does Having More Children Increase the Likelihood of Parental Smoking?
- Does Smoking Cigarettes Relieve Stress?
- Does Time Preference Affect Smoking Behavior?
- How Does Smoking Affect Cardiovascular Endurance?
- How Hypnosis Can Help You Quit Smoking?
- How Does Smoking Affect Brain?
- How Nicotine Affects Your Quit Smoking Victory?
- How Does Secondhand Smoking Affect Us?
- Why Is Smoking Addictive?
- How Smoking Bans Are Bad for Business?
- Why Smoking Should Not Be Permitted in Restaurants?
- Why Public Smoking Should Be Banned?
- Why Has Cigarette Smoking Become So Prominent Within the American Culture?
- What Makes Smoking and Computers Similar?
- Does Smoking Affect Schooling?
- What Effects Can Cigarette Smoking Have on the Respiratory System?
- What Are the Most Prevalent Dangers of Smoking and Drinking?
- Social Security Paper Topics
- Drugs Titles
- Cannabis Essay Titles
- Global Issues Essay Topics
- Cardiovascular Diseases Titles
- Marijuana Ideas
- NHS Research Ideas
- Hypertension Topics
- Chicago (A-D)
- Chicago (N-B)
IvyPanda. (2024, February 29). 235 Smoking Essay Topics & Examples. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/smoking-essay-examples/
"235 Smoking Essay Topics & Examples." IvyPanda , 29 Feb. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/topic/smoking-essay-examples/.
IvyPanda . (2024) '235 Smoking Essay Topics & Examples'. 29 February.
IvyPanda . 2024. "235 Smoking Essay Topics & Examples." February 29, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/smoking-essay-examples/.
1. IvyPanda . "235 Smoking Essay Topics & Examples." February 29, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/smoking-essay-examples/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "235 Smoking Essay Topics & Examples." February 29, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/smoking-essay-examples/.
Credit: Yaorusheng/Moment/Getty
Green Energy Research: Collaboration and Tools for a Sustainable Future
Science Article | Green Energy | 6 Sep 2024
The Urgency of Green Energy Innovation
The recent Climate Change 2023 synthesis report emphasizes the consequences of delayed emission reductions: fewer effective adaptation options for a warming planet 2 . Geopolitical factors like the Russia-Ukraine conflict further underscore the need for a green energy transition, with Europe’s energy security concerns highlighting the reliance on imported fossil fuels.
The Green Energy Research Landscape
Against this backdrop, green energy development has become a critical area of research, reflected in a more than 10-fold increase in related publications from 2010 (1,105) to 2023 (11,346), according to Digital Science’s Dimensions database. Researchers around the world are striving to improve green energy technology and society’s ability to harness renewable energy sources more efficiently.
According to data analysed by Nature Navigator , which uses artificial intelligence to generate comprehensive summaries of research topics, ‘renewable energy systems and technologies’ is the field’s most frequently mentioned subtopic (Fig.1). At a research concept level, wind power generation, grid optimization and resource management all feature as common underlying themes.
Figure 1: Topic anatomy of green energy research First-level nodes denote the research subtopic (highest prevalence themes emerging from green energy research). Second-level nodes denote the research concepts associated with these research subtopics. Note: only the research concepts mentioned in the highest count of outputs within each subtopic are presented here. Credit: Nature Research Intelligence
Of the primary green energy research subtopics presented by Nature Navigator , it is telling that ‘materials for energy storage and conversion’ is the fastest-growing, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 30.2% over the last five years. This may reflect a growing consensus among researchers and industry that a lack of options to efficiently store electricity generated by intermittent renewable sources for later use is a key bottleneck preventing the greater penetration of these sources into the grid.
Real-World Example: Accelerating Heat Pump Innovation
Changmo Sung, a prominent green energy researcher at Korea University, leveraged Nature Navigator to identify trends, key areas, and potential breakthroughs in heat pump technology. This facilitated a collaborative project with LG Electronics, accelerating their research efforts.
“It also enabled the rapid discovery of researchers and institutions outside Korea working on similar or complementary projects related to heat pumps” Sung says.
- International Energy Agency, Global Energy Review 2021 (2021).
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2023 (2023).
Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam
Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...
![tobacco topics research paper U.S. flag](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/coreutils/uswds/img/favicons/favicon-57.png)
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
- Browse Titles
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2012.
![tobacco topics research paper Cover of Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/pmc/pmcgifs/bookshelf/thumbs/th-surgtobyouth-lrg.png)
Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General.
1 introduction, summary, and conclusions.
- Introduction
Tobacco use is a global epidemic among young people. As with adults, it poses a serious health threat to youth and young adults in the United States and has significant implications for this nation’s public and economic health in the future ( Perry et al. 1994 ; Kessler 1995 ). The impact of cigarette smoking and other tobacco use on chronic disease, which accounts for 75% of American spending on health care ( Anderson 2010 ), is well-documented and undeniable. Although progress has been made since the first Surgeon General’s report on smoking and health in 1964 ( U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare [USDHEW] 1964 ), nearly one in four high school seniors is a current smoker. Most young smokers become adult smokers. One-half of adult smokers die prematurely from tobacco-related diseases ( Fagerström 2002 ; Doll et al. 2004 ). Despite thousands of programs to reduce youth smoking and hundreds of thousands of media stories on the dangers of tobacco use, generation after generation continues to use these deadly products, and family after family continues to suffer the devastating consequences. Yet a robust science base exists on social, biological, and environmental factors that influence young people to use tobacco, the physiology of progression from experimentation to addiction, other health effects of tobacco use, the epidemiology of youth and young adult tobacco use, and evidence-based interventions that have proven effective at reducing both initiation and prevalence of tobacco use among young people. Those are precisely the issues examined in this report, which aims to support the application of this robust science base.
Nearly all tobacco use begins in childhood and adolescence ( U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [USDHHS] 1994 ). In all, 88% of adult smokers who smoke daily report that they started smoking by the age of 18 years (see Chapter 3 , “The Epidemiology of Tobacco Use Among Young People in the United States and Worldwide”). This is a time in life of great vulnerability to social influences ( Steinberg 2004 ), such as those offered through the marketing of tobacco products and the modeling of smoking by attractive role models, as in movies ( Dalton et al. 2009 ), which have especially strong effects on the young. This is also a time in life of heightened sensitivity to normative influences: as tobacco use is less tolerated in public areas and there are fewer social or regular users of tobacco, use decreases among youth ( Alesci et al. 2003 ). And so, as we adults quit, we help protect our children.
Cigarettes are the only legal consumer products in the world that cause one-half of their long-term users to die prematurely ( Fagerström 2002 ; Doll et al. 2004 ). As this epidemic continues to take its toll in the United States, it is also increasing in low- and middle-income countries that are least able to afford the resulting health and economic consequences ( Peto and Lopez 2001 ; Reddy et al. 2006 ). It is past time to end this epidemic. To do so, primary prevention is required, for which our focus must be on youth and young adults. As noted in this report, we now have a set of proven tools and policies that can drastically lower youth initiation and use of tobacco products. Fully committing to using these tools and executing these policies consistently and aggressively is the most straight forward and effective to making future generations tobacco-free.
The 1994 Surgeon General’s Report
This Surgeon General’s report on tobacco is the second to focus solely on young people since these reports began in 1964. Its main purpose is to update the science of smoking among youth since the first comprehensive Surgeon General’s report on tobacco use by youth, Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People , was published in 1994 ( USDHHS 1994 ). That report concluded that if young people can remain free of tobacco until 18 years of age, most will never start to smoke. The report documented the addiction process for young people and how the symptoms of addiction in youth are similar to those in adults. Tobacco was also presented as a gateway drug among young people, because its use generally precedes and increases the risk of using illicit drugs. Cigarette advertising and promotional activities were seen as a potent way to increase the risk of cigarette smoking among young people, while community-wide efforts were shown to have been successful in reducing tobacco use among youth. All of these conclusions remain important, relevant, and accurate, as documented in the current report, but there has been considerable research since 1994 that greatly expands our knowledge about tobacco use among youth, its prevention, and the dynamics of cessation among young people. Thus, there is a compelling need for the current report.
Tobacco Control Developments
Since 1994, multiple legal and scientific developments have altered the tobacco control environment and thus have affected smoking among youth. The states and the U.S. Department of Justice brought lawsuits against cigarette companies, with the result that many internal documents of the tobacco industry have been made public and have been analyzed and introduced into the science of tobacco control. Also, the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement with the tobacco companies resulted in the elimination of billboard and transit advertising as well as print advertising that directly targeted underage youth and limitations on the use of brand sponsorships ( National Association of Attorneys General [NAAG] 1998 ). This settlement also created the American Legacy Foundation, which implemented a nationwide antismoking campaign targeting youth. In 2009, the U.S. Congress passed a law that gave the U.S. Food and Drug Administration authority to regulate tobacco products in order to promote the public’s health ( Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act 2009 ). Certain tobacco companies are now subject to regulations limiting their ability to market to young people. In addition, they have had to reimburse state governments (through agreements made with some states and the Master Settlement Agreement) for some health care costs. Due in part to these changes, there was a decrease in tobacco use among adults and among youth following the Master Settlement Agreement, which is documented in this current report.
Recent Surgeon General Reports Addressing Youth Issues
Other reports of the Surgeon General since 1994 have also included major conclusions that relate to tobacco use among youth ( Office of the Surgeon General 2010 ). In 1998, the report focused on tobacco use among U.S. racial/ethnic minority groups ( USDHHS 1998 ) and noted that cigarette smoking among Black and Hispanic youth increased in the 1990s following declines among all racial/ethnic groups in the 1980s; this was particularly notable among Black youth, and culturally appropriate interventions were suggested. In 2000, the report focused on reducing tobacco use ( USDHHS 2000b ). A major conclusion of that report was that school-based interventions, when implemented with community- and media-based activities, could reduce or postpone the onset of smoking among adolescents by 20–40%. That report also noted that effective regulation of tobacco advertising and promotional activities directed at young people would very likely reduce the prevalence and onset of smoking. In 2001, the Surgeon General’s report focused on women and smoking ( USDHHS 2001 ). Besides reinforcing much of what was discussed in earlier reports, this report documented that girls were more affected than boys by the desire to smoke for the purpose of weight control. Given the ongoing obesity epidemic ( Bonnie et al. 2007 ), the current report includes a more extensive review of research in this area.
The 2004 Surgeon General’s report on the health consequences of smoking ( USDHHS 2004 ) concluded that there is sufficient evidence to infer that a causal relationship exists between active smoking and (a) impaired lung growth during childhood and adolescence; (b) early onset of decline in lung function during late adolescence and early adulthood; (c) respiratory signs and symptoms in children and adolescents, including coughing, phlegm, wheezing, and dyspnea; and (d) asthma-related symptoms (e.g., wheezing) in childhood and adolescence. The 2004 Surgeon General’s report further provided evidence that cigarette smoking in young people is associated with the development of atherosclerosis.
The 2010 Surgeon General’s report on the biology of tobacco focused on the understanding of biological and behavioral mechanisms that might underlie the pathogenicity of tobacco smoke ( USDHHS 2010 ). Although there are no specific conclusions in that report regarding adolescent addiction, it does describe evidence indicating that adolescents can become dependent at even low levels of consumption. Two studies ( Adriani et al. 2003 ; Schochet et al. 2005 ) referenced in that report suggest that because the adolescent brain is still developing, it may be more susceptible and receptive to nicotine than the adult brain.
Scientific Reviews
Since 1994, several scientific reviews related to one or more aspects of tobacco use among youth have been undertaken that also serve as a foundation for the current report. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) ( Lynch and Bonnie 1994 ) released Growing Up Tobacco Free: Preventing Nicotine Addiction in Children and Youths, a report that provided policy recommendations based on research to that date. In 1998, IOM provided a white paper, Taking Action to Reduce Tobacco Use, on strategies to reduce the increasing prevalence (at that time) of smoking among young people and adults. More recently, IOM ( Bonnie et al. 2007 ) released a comprehensive report entitled Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation . Although that report covered multiple potential approaches to tobacco control, not just those focused on youth, it characterized the overarching goal of reducing smoking as involving three distinct steps: “reducing the rate of initiation of smoking among youth (IOM [ Lynch and Bonnie] 1994 ), reducing involuntary tobacco smoke exposure ( National Research Council 1986 ), and helping people quit smoking” (p. 3). Thus, reducing onset was seen as one of the primary goals of tobacco control.
As part of USDHHS continuing efforts to assess the health of the nation, prevent disease, and promote health, the department released, in 2000, Healthy People 2010 and, in 2010, Healthy People 2020 ( USDHHS 2000a , 2011 ). Healthy People provides science-based, 10-year national objectives for improving the health of all Americans. For 3 decades, Healthy People has established benchmarks and monitored progress over time in order to encourage collaborations across sectors, guide individuals toward making informed health decisions, and measure the impact of prevention activities. Each iteration of Healthy People serves as the nation’s disease prevention and health promotion roadmap for the decade. Both Healthy People 2010 and Healthy People 2020 highlight “Tobacco Use” as one of the nation’s “Leading Health Indicators,” feature “Tobacco Use” as one of its topic areas, and identify specific measurable tobacco-related objectives and targets for the nation to strive for. Healthy People 2010 and Healthy People 2020 provide tobacco objectives based on the most current science and detailed population-based data to drive action, assess tobacco use among young people, and identify racial and ethnic disparities. Additionally, many of the Healthy People 2010 and 2020 tobacco objectives address reductions of tobacco use among youth and target decreases in tobacco advertising in venues most often influencing young people. A complete list of the healthy people 2020 objectives can be found on their Web site ( USDHHS 2011 ).
In addition, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health has published monographs pertinent to the topic of tobacco use among youth. In 2001, NCI published Monograph 14, Changing Adolescent Smoking Prevalence , which reviewed data on smoking among youth in the 1990s, highlighted important statewide intervention programs, presented data on the influence of marketing by the tobacco industry and the pricing of cigarettes, and examined differences in smoking by racial/ethnic subgroup ( NCI 2001 ). In 2008, NCI published Monograph 19, The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use ( NCI 2008 ). Although young people were not the sole focus of this Monograph, the causal relationship between tobacco advertising and promotion and increased tobacco use, the impact on youth of depictions of smoking in movies, and the success of media campaigns in reducing youth tobacco use were highlighted as major conclusions of the report.
The Community Preventive Services Task Force (2011) provides evidence-based recommendations about community preventive services, programs, and policies on a range of topics including tobacco use prevention and cessation ( Task Force on Community Preventive Services 2001 , 2005 ). Evidence reviews addressing interventions to reduce tobacco use initiation and restricting minors’ access to tobacco products were cited and used to inform the reviews in the current report. The Cochrane Collaboration (2010) has also substantially contributed to the review literature on youth and tobacco use by producing relevant systematic assessments of health-related programs and interventions. Relevant to this Surgeon General’s report are Cochrane reviews on interventions using mass media ( Sowden 1998 ), community interventions to prevent smoking ( Sowden and Stead 2003 ), the effects of advertising and promotional activities on smoking among youth ( Lovato et al. 2003 , 2011 ), preventing tobacco sales to minors ( Stead and Lancaster 2005 ), school-based programs ( Thomas and Perara 2006 ), programs for young people to quit using tobacco ( Grimshaw and Stanton 2006 ), and family programs for preventing smoking by youth ( Thomas et al. 2007 ). These reviews have been cited throughout the current report when appropriate.
In summary, substantial new research has added to our knowledge and understanding of tobacco use and control as it relates to youth since the 1994 Surgeon General’s report, including updates and new data in subsequent Surgeon General’s reports, in IOM reports, in NCI Monographs, and in Cochrane Collaboration reviews, in addition to hundreds of peer-reviewed publications, book chapters, policy reports, and systematic reviews. Although this report is a follow-up to the 1994 report, other important reviews have been undertaken in the past 18 years and have served to fill the gap during an especially active and important time in research on tobacco control among youth.
- Focus of the Report
Young People
This report focuses on “young people.” In general, work was reviewed on the health consequences, epidemiology, etiology, reduction, and prevention of tobacco use for those in the young adolescent (11–14 years of age), adolescent (15–17 years of age), and young adult (18–25 years of age) age groups. When possible, an effort was made to be specific about the age group to which a particular analysis, study, or conclusion applies. Because hundreds of articles, books, and reports were reviewed, however, there are, unavoidably, inconsistencies in the terminology used. “Adolescents,” “children,” and “youth” are used mostly interchangeably throughout this report. In general, this group encompasses those 11–17 years of age, although “children” is a more general term that will include those younger than 11 years of age. Generally, those who are 18–25 years old are considered young adults (even though, developmentally, the period between 18–20 years of age is often labeled late adolescence), and those 26 years of age or older are considered adults.
In addition, it is important to note that the report is concerned with active smoking or use of smokeless tobacco on the part of the young person. The report does not consider young people’s exposure to secondhand smoke, also referred to as involuntary or passive smoking, which was discussed in the 2006 report of the Surgeon General ( USDHHS 2006 ). Additionally, the report does not discuss research on children younger than 11 years old; there is very little evidence of tobacco use in the United States by children younger than 11 years of age, and although there may be some predictors of later tobacco use in those younger years, the research on active tobacco use among youth has been focused on those 11 years of age and older.
Tobacco Use
Although cigarette smoking is the most common form of tobacco use in the United States, this report focuses on other forms as well, such as using smokeless tobacco (including chew and snuff) and smoking a product other than a cigarette, such as a pipe, cigar, or bidi (tobacco wrapped in tendu leaves). Because for young people the use of one form of tobacco has been associated with use of other tobacco products, it is particularly important to monitor all forms of tobacco use in this age group. The term “tobacco use” in this report indicates use of any tobacco product. When the word “smoking” is used alone, it refers to cigarette smoking.
- Organization of the Report
This chapter begins by providing a short synopsis of other reports that have addressed smoking among youth and, after listing the major conclusions of this report, will end by presenting conclusions specific to each chapter. Chapter 2 of this report (“The Health Consequences of Tobacco Use Among Young People”) focuses on the diseases caused by early tobacco use, the addiction process, the relation of body weight to smoking, respiratory and pulmonary problems associated with tobacco use, and cardiovascular effects. Chapter 3 (“The Epidemiology of Tobacco Use Among Young People in the United States and Worldwide”) provides recent and long-term cross-sectional and longitudinal data on cigarette smoking, use of smokeless tobacco, and the use of other tobacco products by young people, by racial/ethnic group and gender, primarily in the United States, but including some worldwide data as well. Chapter 4 (“Social, Environmental, Cognitive, and Genetic Influences on the Use of Tobacco Among Youth”) identifies the primary risk factors associated with tobacco use among youth at four levels, including the larger social and physical environments, smaller social groups, cognitive factors, and genetics and neurobiology. Chapter 5 (“The Tobacco Industry’s Influences on the Use of Tobacco Among Youth”) includes data on marketing expenditures for the tobacco industry over time and by category, the effects of cigarette advertising and promotional activities on young people’s smoking, the effects of price and packaging on use, the use of the Internet and movies to market tobacco products, and an evaluation of efforts by the tobacco industry to prevent tobacco use among young people. Chapter 6 (“Efforts to Prevent and Reduce Tobacco Use Among Young People”) provides evidence on the effectiveness of family-based, clinic-based, and school-based programs, mass media campaigns, regulatory and legislative approaches, increased cigarette prices, and community and statewide efforts in the fight against tobacco use among youth. Chapter 7 (“A Vision for Ending the Tobacco Epidemic”) points to next steps in preventing and reducing tobacco use among young people.
- Preparation of the Report
This report of the Surgeon General was prepared by the Office on Smoking and Health (OSH), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USDHHS. In 2008, 18 external independent scientists reviewed the 1994 report and suggested areas to be added and updated. These scientists also suggested chapter editors and a senior scientific editor, who were contacted by OSH. Each chapter editor named external scientists who could contribute, and 33 content experts prepared draft sections. The draft sections were consolidated into chapters by the chapter editors and then reviewed by the senior scientific editor, with technical editing performed by CDC. The chapters were sent individually to 34 peer reviewers who are experts in the areas covered and who reviewed the chapters for scientific accuracy and comprehensiveness. The entire manuscript was then sent to more than 25 external senior scientists who reviewed the science of the entire document. After each review cycle, the drafts were revised by the chapter and senior scientific editor on the basis of the experts’ comments. Subsequently, the report was reviewed by various agencies within USDHHS. Publication lags prevent up-to-the-minute inclusion of all recently published articles and data, and so some more recent publications may not be cited in this report.
- Evaluation of the Evidence
Since the first Surgeon General’s report in 1964 on smoking and health ( USDHEW 1964 ), major conclusions concerning the conditions and diseases caused by cigarette smoking and the use of smokeless tobacco have been based on explicit criteria for causal inference ( USDHHS 2004 ). Although a number of different criteria have been proposed for causal inference since the 1960s, this report focuses on the five commonly accepted criteria that were used in the original 1964 report and that are discussed in greater detail in the 2004 report on the health consequences of smoking ( USDHHS 2004 ). The five criteria refer to the examination of the association between two variables, such as a risk factor (e.g., smoking) and an outcome (e.g., lung cancer). Causal inference between these variables is based on (1) the consistency of the association across multiple studies; this is the persistent finding of an association in different persons, places, circumstances, and times; (2) the degree of the strength of association, that is, the magnitude and statistical significance of the association in multiple studies; (3) the specificity of the association to clearly demonstrate that tobacco use is robustly associated with the condition, even if tobacco use has multiple effects and multiple causes exist for the condition; (4) the temporal relationship of the association so that tobacco use precedes disease onset; and (5) the coherence of the association, that is, the argument that the association makes scientific sense, given data from other sources and understanding of biological and psychosocial mechanisms ( USDHHS 2004 ). Since the 2004 Surgeon General’s report, The Health Consequences of Smoking , a four-level hierarchy ( Table 1.1 ) has been used to assess the research data on associations discussed in these reports ( USDHHS 2004 ). In general, this assessment was done by the chapter editors and then reviewed as appropriate by peer reviewers, senior scientists, and the scientific editors. For a relationship to be considered sufficient to be characterized as causal, multiple studies over time provided evidence in support of each criteria.
Four-level hierarchy for classifying the strength of causal inferences based on available evidence.
When a causal association is presented in the chapter conclusions in this report, these four levels are used to describe the strength of the evidence of the association, from causal (1) to not causal (4). Within the report, other terms are used to discuss the evidence to date (i.e., mixed, limited, and equivocal evidence), which generally represent an inadequacy of data to inform a conclusion.
However, an assessment of a casual relationship is not utilized in presenting all of the report’s conclusions. The major conclusions are written to be important summary statements that are easily understood by those reading the report. Some conclusions, particularly those found in Chapter 3 (epidemiology), provide observations and data related to tobacco use among young people, and are generally not examinations of causal relationships. For those conclusions that are written using the hierarchy above, a careful and extensive review of the literature has been undertaken for this report, based on the accepted causal criteria ( USDHHS 2004 ). Evidence that was characterized as Level 1 or Level 2 was prioritized for inclusion as chapter conclusions.
In additional to causal inferences, statistical estimation and hypothesis testing of associations are presented. For example, confidence intervals have been added to the tables in the chapter on the epidemiology of youth tobacco use (see Chapter 3 ), and statistical testing has been conducted for that chapter when appropriate. The chapter on efforts to prevent tobacco use discusses the relative improvement in tobacco use rates when implementing one type of program (or policy) versus a control program. Statistical methods, including meta-analytic methods and longitudinal trajectory analyses, are also presented to ensure that the methods of evaluating data are up to date with the current cutting-edge research that has been reviewed. Regardless of the methods used to assess significance, the five causal criteria discussed above were applied in developing the conclusions of each chapter and the report.
- Major Conclusions
- Cigarette smoking by youth and young adults has immediate adverse health consequences, including addiction, and accelerates the development of chronic diseases across the full life course.
- Prevention efforts must focus on both adolescents and young adults because among adults who become daily smokers, nearly all first use of cigarettes occurs by 18 years of age (88%), with 99% of first use by 26 years of age.
- Advertising and promotional activities by tobacco companies have been shown to cause the onset and continuation of smoking among adolescents and young adults.
- After years of steady progress, declines in the use of tobacco by youth and young adults have slowed for cigarette smoking and stalled for smokeless tobacco use.
- Coordinated, multicomponent interventions that combine mass media campaigns, price increases including those that result from tax increases, school-based policies and programs, and statewide or community-wide changes in smoke-free policies and norms are effective in reducing the initiation, prevalence, and intensity of smoking among youth and young adults.
- Chapter Conclusions
The following are the conclusions presented in the substantive chapters of this report.
Chapter 2. The Health Consequences of Tobacco Use Among Young People
- The evidence is sufficient to conclude that there is a causal relationship between smoking and addiction to nicotine, beginning in adolescence and young adulthood.
- The evidence is suggestive but not sufficient to conclude that smoking contributes to future use of marijuana and other illicit drugs.
- The evidence is suggestive but not sufficient to conclude that smoking by adolescents and young adults is not associated with significant weight loss, contrary to young people’s beliefs.
- The evidence is sufficient to conclude that there is a causal relationship between active smoking and both reduced lung function and impaired lung growth during childhood and adolescence.
- The evidence is sufficient to conclude that there is a causal relationship between active smoking and wheezing severe enough to be diagnosed as asthma in susceptible child and adolescent populations.
- The evidence is sufficient to conclude that there is a causal relationship between smoking in adolescence and young adulthood and early abdominal aortic atherosclerosis in young adults.
- The evidence is suggestive but not sufficient to conclude that there is a causal relationship between smoking in adolescence and young adulthood and coronary artery atherosclerosis in adulthood.
Chapter 3. The Epidemiology of Tobacco Use Among Young People in the United States and Worldwide
- Among adults who become daily smokers, nearly all first use of cigarettes occurs by 18 years of age (88%), with 99% of first use by 26 years of age.
- Almost one in four high school seniors is a current (in the past 30 days) cigarette smoker, compared with one in three young adults and one in five adults. About 1 in 10 high school senior males is a current smokeless tobacco user, and about 1 in 5 high school senior males is a current cigar smoker.
- Among adolescents and young adults, cigarette smoking declined from the late 1990s, particularly after the Master Settlement Agreement in 1998. This decline has slowed in recent years, however.
- Significant disparities in tobacco use remain among young people nationwide. The prevalence of cigarette smoking is highest among American Indians and Alaska Natives, followed by Whites and Hispanics, and then Asians and Blacks. The prevalence of cigarette smoking is also highest among lower socioeconomic status youth.
- Use of smokeless tobacco and cigars declined in the late 1990s, but the declines appear to have stalled in the last 5 years. The latest data show the use of smokeless tobacco is increasing among White high school males, and cigar smoking may be increasing among Black high school females.
- Concurrent use of multiple tobacco products is prevalent among youth. Among those who use tobacco, nearly one-third of high school females and more than one-half of high school males report using more than one tobacco product in the last 30 days.
- Rates of tobacco use remain low among girls relative to boys in many developing countries, however, the gender gap between adolescent females and males is narrow in many countries around the globe.
Chapter 4. Social, Environmental, Cognitive, and Genetic Influences on the Use of Tobacco Among Youth
- Given their developmental stage, adolescents and young adults are uniquely susceptible to social and environmental influences to use tobacco.
- Socioeconomic factors and educational attainment influence the development of youth smoking behavior. The adolescents most likely to begin to use tobacco and progress to regular use are those who have lower academic achievement.
- The evidence is sufficient to conclude that there is a causal relationship between peer group social influences and the initiation and maintenance of smoking behaviors during adolescence.
- Affective processes play an important role in youth smoking behavior, with a strong association between youth smoking and negative affect.
- The evidence is suggestive that tobacco use is a heritable trait, more so for regular use than for onset. The expression of genetic risk for smoking among young people may be moderated by small-group and larger social-environmental factors.
Chapter 5. The Tobacco Industry’s Influences on the Use of Tobacco Among Youth
- In 2008, tobacco companies spent $9.94 billion on the marketing of cigarettes and $547 million on the marketing of smokeless tobacco. Spending on cigarette marketing is 48% higher than in 1998, the year of the Master Settlement Agreement. Expenditures for marketing smokeless tobacco are 277% higher than in 1998.
- Tobacco company expenditures have become increasingly concentrated on marketing efforts that reduce the prices of targeted tobacco products. Such expenditures accounted for approximately 84% of cigarette marketing and more than 77% of the marketing of smokeless tobacco products in 2008.
- The evidence is sufficient to conclude that there is a causal relationship between advertising and promotional efforts of the tobacco companies and the initiation and progression of tobacco use among young people.
- The evidence is suggestive but not sufficient to conclude that tobacco companies have changed the packaging and design of their products in ways that have increased these products’ appeal to adolescents and young adults.
- The tobacco companies’ activities and programs for the prevention of youth smoking have not demonstrated an impact on the initiation or prevalence of smoking among young people.
- The evidence is sufficient to conclude that there is a causal relationship between depictions of smoking in the movies and the initiation of smoking among young people.
Chapter 6. Efforts to Prevent and Reduce Tobacco Use Among Young People
- The evidence is sufficient to conclude that mass media campaigns, comprehensive community programs, and comprehensive statewide tobacco control programs can prevent the initiation of tobacco use and reduce its prevalence among youth.
- The evidence is sufficient to conclude that increases in cigarette prices reduce the initiation, prevalence, and intensity of smoking among youth and young adults.
- The evidence is sufficient to conclude that school-based programs with evidence of effectiveness, containing specific components, can produce at least short-term effects and reduce the prevalence of tobacco use among school-aged youth.
- Adriani W, Spijker S, Deroche-Gamonet V, Laviola G, Le Moal M, Smit AB, Piazza PV. Evidence for enhanced neurobehavioral vulnerability to nicotine during peri-adolescence in rats. Journal of Neuroscience. 2003; 23 (11):4712–6. [ PMC free article : PMC6740776 ] [ PubMed : 12805310 ]
- Alesci NL, Forster JL, Blaine T. Smoking visibility, perceived acceptability, and frequency in various locations among youth and adults. Preventive Medicine. 2003; 36 (3):272–81. [ PubMed : 12634018 ]
- Anderson G. Chronic Care: Making the Case for Ongoing Care. Princeton (NJ): Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2010. [accessed: November 30, 2011]. < http://www .rwjf.org/files /research/50968chronic .care.chartbook.pdf >.
- Bonnie RJ, Stratton K, Wallace RB, editors. Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation. Washington: National Academies Press; 2007.
- Cochrane Collaboration. Home page. 2010. [accessed: November 30, 2010]. < http://www .cochrane.org/ >.
- Community Preventive Services Task Force. First Annual Report to Congress and to Agencies Related to the Work of the Task Force. Community Preventive Services Task Force. 2011. [accessed: January 9, 2012]. < http://www .thecommunityguide .org/library /ARC2011/congress-report-full.pdf >.
- Dalton MA, Beach ML, Adachi-Mejia AM, Longacre MR, Matzkin AL, Sargent JD, Heatherton TF, Titus-Ernstoff L. Early exposure to movie smoking predicts established smoking by older teens and young adults. Pediatrics. 2009; 123 (4):e551–e558. [ PMC free article : PMC2758519 ] [ PubMed : 19336346 ]
- Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I. Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years’ observations on male British doctors. BMJ (British Medical Journal). 2004; 32 :1519. [ PMC free article : PMC437139 ] [ PubMed : 15213107 ] [ CrossRef ]
- Fagerström K. The epidemiology of smoking: health consequences and benefits of cessation. Drugs. 2002; 62 (Suppl 2):1–9. [ PubMed : 12109931 ]
- Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, Public Law 111-31, 123 U.S. Statutes at Large 1776 (2009)
- Grimshaw G, Stanton A. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;(4):CD003289. [ PubMed : 17054164 ] [ CrossRef ]
- Kessler DA. Nicotine addiction in young people. New England Journal of Medicine. 1995; 333 (3):186–9. [ PubMed : 7791824 ]
- Lovato C, Linn G, Stead LF, Best A. Impact of tobacco advertising and promotion on increasing adolescent smoking behaviours. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003;(4):CD003439. [ PubMed : 14583977 ] [ CrossRef ]
- Lovato C, Watts A, Stead LF. Impact of tobacco advertising and promotion on increasing adolescent smoking behaviours. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011;(10):CD003439. [ PMC free article : PMC7173757 ] [ PubMed : 21975739 ] [ CrossRef ]
- Lynch BS, Bonnie RJ, editors. Growing Up Tobacco Free: Preventing Nicotine Addiction in Children and Youths. Washington: National Academies Press; 1994. [ PubMed : 25144107 ]
- National Association of Attorneys General. Master Settlement Agreement. 1998. [accessed: June 9, 2011]. < http://www .naag.org/back-pages /naag/tobacco /msa/msa-pdf/MSA%20with %20Sig%20Pages%20and%20Exhibits .pdf/file_view >.
- National Cancer Institute. Changing Adolescent Smoking Prevalence. Bethesda (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2001. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 14. NIH Publication. No. 02-5086.
- National Cancer Institute. The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. Bethesda (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2008. Tobacco Control Monograph No. 19. NIH Publication No. 07-6242.
- National Research Council. Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Measuring Exposures and Assessing Health Effects. Washington: National Academy Press; 1986. [ PubMed : 25032469 ]
- Office of the Surgeon General Reports of the Surgeon General, U.S. Public Health Service. 2010. [accessed: November 30, 2010]. < http://www .surgeongeneral .gov/library/reports/index.html >.
- Perry CL, Eriksen M, Giovino G. Tobacco use: a pediatric epidemic [editorial] Tobacco Control. 1994; 3 (2):97–8.
- Peto R, Lopez AD. Future worldwide health effects of current smoking patterns. In: Koop CE, Pearson CE, Schwarz MR, editors. Critical Issues in Global Health. San Francisco: Wiley (Jossey-Bass); 2001. pp. 154–61.
- Reddy KS, Perry CL, Stigler MH, Arora M. Differences in tobacco use among young people in urban India by sex, socioeconomic status, age, and school grade: assessment of baseline survey data. Lancet. 2006; 367 (9510):589–94. [ PubMed : 16488802 ]
- Schochet TL, Kelley AE, Landry CF. Differential expression of arc mRNA and other plasticity-related genes induced by nicotine in adolescent rat forebrain. Neuroscience. 2005; 135 (1):285–97. [ PMC free article : PMC1599838 ] [ PubMed : 16084664 ]
- Sowden AJ. Mass media interventions for preventing smoking in young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1998;(4):CD001006. [ PubMed : 10796581 ] [ CrossRef ]
- Sowden AJ, Stead LF. Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003;(1):CD001291. [ PubMed : 12535406 ] [ CrossRef ]
- Stead LF, Lancaster T. Interventions for preventing tobacco sales to minors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005;(1):CD001497. [ PubMed : 15674880 ] [ CrossRef ]
- Steinberg L. Risk taking in adolescence: what changes, and why? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2004; 1021 :51–8. [ PubMed : 15251873 ]
- Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Recommendations regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2001; 20 (2 Suppl):S10–S15. [ PubMed : 11173214 ]
- Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Tobacco. In: Zaza S, Briss PA, Harris KW, editors. The Guide to Preventive Services: What Works to Promote Health? New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. pp. 3–79. < http://www .thecommunityguide .org/tobacco/Tobacco.pdf >.
- Thomas RE, Baker PRA, Lorenzetti D. Family-based programmes for preventing smoking by children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;(1):CD004493. [ PubMed : 17253511 ] [ CrossRef ]
- Thomas RE, Perera R. School-based programmes for preventing smoking. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;(3):CD001293. [ PubMed : 16855966 ] [ CrossRef ]
- US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 1994.
- US Department of Health and Human Services. Tobacco Use Among US Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups—African Americans, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 1998.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd ed. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000.
- US Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2000.
- US Department of Health and Human Services. Women and Smoking A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General; 2001.
- US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2004.
- US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006. [ PubMed : 20669524 ]
- US Department of Health and Human Services. How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease—The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Tobacco-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2010. [ PubMed : 21452462 ]
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2020. 2011. [accessed: November 1, 2011]. < http://www .healthypeople .gov/2020/default.aspx >.
- US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. Washington: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control; 1964. PHS Publication No. 1103.
- Cite this Page National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2012. 1, Introduction, Summary, and Conclusions.
- PDF version of this title (18M)
In this Page
Other titles in these collections.
- Reports of the Surgeon General
- Health Services/Technology Assessment Text (HSTAT)
Related information
- PMC PubMed Central citations
- PubMed Links to PubMed
Recent Activity
- Introduction, Summary, and Conclusions - Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and ... Introduction, Summary, and Conclusions - Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on
Connect with NLM
National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894
Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure
Help Accessibility Careers
![](http://nandemo.space/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
COMMENTS
Background and objectives: Despite reductions in prevalence in recent years, tobacco smoking remains one of the main preventable causes of ill-health and premature death worldwide.This paper reviews the extent and nature of harms caused by smoking, the benefits of stopping, patterns of smoking, psychological, pharmacological and social factors that contribute to uptake and maintenance of ...
Almost 35 years ago, the Office of the Surgeon General of the United States Health Service reviewed over 7000 research papers on the topic of smoking and health, and publicly recognized the role of smoking in various diseases, including lung cancer. ... Although the exposure to ETS is a current topic of debate in tobacco-related cancers and ...
About the Journal. Nicotine & Tobacco Research aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Find out more here.
For instance, recent papers have investigated the effects of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products on cardiopulmonary outcomes [9,10,11,12,13,14]. However, the papers have mainly focused on clinical measurements, such as spirometry and other lung function tests; consumer perception is rarely explored or the focus of the research.
We identified three outcomes with a 4-star association with smoking: COPD (72% increase in risk based on the BPRF, 0.54 ROS), lower respiratory tract infection (54%, 0.43) and pancreatic cancer ...
In their Article in The Lancet Public Health, Marissa Reitsma and colleagues1 report their comprehensive analysis of smoking tobacco use in young people from more than 3000 tobacco surveys from 204 countries and territories around the world. The result is an invaluable overview of an epidemic that causes millions of deaths every year. Their detailed mapping of the prevalence of smoking tobacco ...
Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world's few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment ...
Tobacco smoking is a major determinant of preventable morbidity and mortality worldwide. ... analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for ...
Tobacco Use Insights is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that looks at all aspects of the health impacts of tobacco use and smoking cessation. The journal is multidisciplinary and includes research from the social, psychological, epidemiological, prevention, economic, and treatment arenas. View full journal description
Tobacco smoking: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Background and objectives: Despite reductions in prevalence in recent years, tobacco smoking remains one of the main preventable causes of ill-health and premature death worldwide. This paper reviews the extent and nature of harms caused by smoking, the benefits of ...
The official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine & Tobacco. Publishes research on nicotine and tobacco from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas.
Youth and young adult research primarily related to the priority topic of tobacco use behavior included more articles than the other priority areas (n = 206), and thus was a key focus of the Centers' research. The articles varied by tobacco product, study design, and population.
In 2014, the Nation marked the 50th anniversary of the first Surgeon General's Report on Smoking and Health. In 1964, more than 40 percent of the adult population smoked. Once the link between smoking and its medical consequences—including cancers and heart and lung diseases—became a part of the public consciousness, education efforts and public policy changes were enacted to reduce the ...
Cutting-edge neuroimaging technologies have identified brain changes associated with nicotine dependence and smoking. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), scientists can visualize smokers' brains as they respond to cigarette-associated cues that can trigger craving and relapse. 231 Such research may lead to a biomarker for ...
FDA supports science and research to help us better understand tobacco use and associated risks so that we can reduce the public health burden of tobacco in the United States. Research programs ...
INTRODUCTION "To lower nicotine too much might end up destroying the nicotine habit in a large number of consumers and prevent it from ever being acquired by new smokers. - British American Tobacco Company internal document, June 1959 ().Combusted tobacco use remains a major cause of premature disability and death around the world ().Cigarette smoke contains an estimated 7000 different ...
The six MPOWER measures are as follows: (a) Monitor tobacco use and prevention policies (M); (b) Protect people from tobacco smoke (P); (c) Offer help to quit tobacco use (O); (d) Warn about the dangers of tobacco (W); (e) Enforce bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (E); and (f) Raise taxes on tobacco (R) (see Table 1 for an ...
Abstract. Tobacco use is associated with an annual global economic cost of two trillion dollars and mortality of half of its regular users. Tobacco leaf cultivation is the starting point of the tobacco cycle. Tobacco farming employs millions of small-scale tobacco farmers around the globe, most of whom are out growers who rely on the tobacco ...
Tobacco. Nicotine contained in tobacco is highly addictive and tobacco use is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, over 20 different types or subtypes of cancer, and many other debilitating health conditions. Every year, more than 8 million people die from tobacco use. Most tobacco-related deaths occur in low- and ...
The journal with the highest number of top 100 cited articles was the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) with eight ( Table 2 ), followed by the Lancet with six. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Nature, and Nicotine and Tobacco Research each had four highly-cited articles. The impact factors for journals with the top ...
Here we've gathered a range of catchy titles for research papers about smoking together with smoking essay examples. Get inspired with us! We will write a custom essay specifically for you by our professional experts. 186 writers online. Learn More. Smoking is a well-known source of harm yet popular regardless, and so smoking essays should ...
Against this backdrop, green energy development has become a critical area of research, reflected in a more than 10-fold increase in related publications from 2010 (1,105) to 2023 (11,346 ...
Introduction. Tobacco is a well established cause of at least 13 cancers; 1 however, until recently there have been no large evidence-based assessments of the effects of smoking on cancer treatment outcomes. The 2014 Surgeon General's Report 1 is the "first large evidence review to report a causal association between tobacco use and adverse clinical outcomes for patients with cancer".
Tobacco use is a global epidemic among young people. As with adults, it poses a serious health threat to youth and young adults in the United States and has significant implications for this nation's public and economic health in the future (Perry et al. 1994; Kessler 1995). The impact of cigarette smoking and other tobacco use on chronic disease, which accounts for 75% of American spending ...