legal essays on right to silence

• Find a Lawyer
• Ask a Lawyer
• Research the Law
• Law Schools
• Laws & Regs
• Newsletters
• Justia Connect
• Pro Membership
• Basic Membership
• Justia Lawyer Directory
• Platinum Placements
• Gold Placements
• Justia Elevate
• Justia Amplify
• PPC Management
• Google Business Profile
• Social Media
• Justia Onward Blog
• The Right to Silence for Criminal Suspects Under the Law

The Right to Remain Silent

The “right to remain silent” is well-known to anyone who watches movies or TV shows about police, but the constitutional rights that the statement represents are not always very well understood. The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects people from being compelled to give testimony that could incriminate them. This is not the same as saying that a person has a right to silence at all times. In some situations, police may use silence itself as incriminating evidence. The Supreme Court has held that police must stop questioning suspects once they assert their right to counsel , but it has also held that a person must affirmatively invoke the right to silence.

Courts have admitted the paradoxical nature of the right to remain silent – an individual must verbalize that they are invoking their right to remain silent.

Silence at Trial

The Fifth Amendment states that “[n]o person...shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” The right to silence is among the Miranda rights that police must recite during or shortly after an arrest. The primary application of this right occurs during criminal court proceedings , where prosecutors are not allowed to call the defendant as a witness. The defendant has sole discretion over whether to testify at trial, and prosecutors may not comment if the defendant decides not to do so. Griffin v. California , 380 U.S. 609 (1965); Harris v. New York , 401 U.S. 222 (1971).

An exception to the right against self-incrimination in court applies if prosecutors have granted the person immunity from prosecution. The Supreme Court has held that the immunity provisions of federal law offer the same protections as the Fifth Amendment. Kastigar v. United States , 406 U.S. 441, 462 (1972).

Silence During Police Interviews or Interrogations

The question of whether a person has a right to silence, essentially meaning a right to refuse to speak to police or answer their questions, has no simple answer. As a very general rule, no one is obligated to speak to the police, but even non-verbal communication can, in some situations, be incriminating.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436 (1966), which gave us the well-known Miranda warnings, requires police to cease any and all interrogation once a person has invoked the right to an attorney, and it holds that any statements made afterwards are inadmissible in court. This only applies, however, after police have advised the person of their Miranda rights, which they are only obligated to do once they have placed that person under arrest.

• “I am exercising my right to remain silent.”
• “I will not speak until I talk with my attorney.”
• “I am invoking my Miranda rights.”

Failure to Invoke the Right to Silence

Two recent court cases illustrate situations when a person’s silence could be used against him or her, without violating the Fifth Amendment or Miranda . Both involve failure by the defendant to assert the right to silence.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Salinas v. Texas , 570 U.S. __ (2013), dealt with a situation in which the defendant spoke to the police voluntarily during a murder investigation, meaning that he was not under arrest when the purportedly incriminating event occurred. When the police officer asked the defendant about his possible involvement in the murder, the officer testified, the defendant became very quiet, and his entire demeanor changed. Police offered the defendant’s silence and behavioral change as incriminating evidence. The court held that police did not violate the defendant’s rights against self-incrimination, in part because the defendant did not expressly invoke his Fifth Amendment rights.

The California Supreme Court reached a similar conclusion in a recent decision, People v. Tom , No. S202107 (Cal., Aug. 14, 2014), which involved evidence of literal silence after an alleged drunk-driving accident—specifically, that the defendant “expressed no concern about the well-being of the other people involved in the collision.” Since this lack of concern occurred after the defendant’s arrest but before he received Miranda warnings, and because he did not expressly assert his right to silence, the court held that his rights were not violated.

Last reviewed October 2023

Criminal Law Center Contents   

• Criminal Law Center
• Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Criminal Sentencing Law
• Bail, Bonds, and Relevant Legal Concerns
• Restitution for Victims in Criminal Law
• Plea Bargains in Criminal Law Cases
• Receiving Immunity for Testimony in a Criminal Law Case
• Legal Classification of Criminal Offenses
• Common Criminal Defenses
• Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Law Cases
• Criminal Appeals
• Motions for a New Trial in Criminal Law Cases
• Competency to Stand Trial in Criminal Law Cases
• Continuances in Criminal Law Cases
• Judgments of Acquittal in Criminal Trials
• Joint Trials for Criminal Defendants & Legal Considerations
• Immigration Removal Proceedings & Criminal Law Concerns
• The Right to an Attorney in a Criminal Law Case
• The Right to a Public Defender in a Criminal Law Case
• Custodial Interrogations in Criminal Law Cases
• Involuntary Confessions by Criminal Suspects & Legal Concerns
• Waiver of Miranda Rights by Criminal Suspects & Relevant Legal Issues
• Using Post-Arrest Silence of Criminal Defendants at Trial & Legal Limits
• Miranda Rights for Student Criminal Suspects Under the Law
• Exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule in Criminal Procedure Law
• Police Stops on the Street & Your Legal Rights
• Video or Audio Recording of Police Officers & Your Legal Rights
• Arrests and Arrest Warrants
• Constitutional Rights in Criminal Law Proceedings
• The Right to a Speedy Trial in a Criminal Law Case
• The Right to a Public Trial in a Criminal Law Case
• Double Jeopardy & Legal Protections for Criminal Defendants
• Discovery in Criminal Law Cases
• Hearsay Evidence in Criminal Law
• Stages of a Criminal Case
• Stages of a Criminal Trial
• The Search Warrant Requirement in Criminal Investigations & Legal Exceptions
• Limits on Searches and Seizures in Criminal Investigations by Law Enforcement
• Qualified Immunity
• Criminal Statutes of Limitations: 50-State Survey
• Types of Criminal Offenses
• Alcohol Crimes Under the Law
• Parole and Probation Law
• Expungement and Sealing of Criminal Records
• Offenses Included in Other Crimes Under the Law
• The Mental State Requirement in Criminal Law Cases
• Derivative Responsibility in Criminal Law Cases
• Working with a Criminal Lawyer
• Criminal Law FAQs
• Domestic Violence Restraining Orders Laws and Forms: 50-State Survey
• 50-State Survey on Abortion Laws
• Gun Laws: 50-State Survey
• Death Penalty Laws: 50-State Survey
• Criminal Law Topics
• Find a Criminal Law Lawyer

Related Areas   

• DUI & DWI Law Center
• Traffic Tickets Legal Center
• Immigration Law Center
• Tax Law Center
• Military Law Center
• Personal Injury Law Center
• Animal and Dog Law Center
• Communications and Internet Law Center
• Aviation Law Center
• Cannabis Law Center
• Constitutional Law Center
• Related Areas
• Bankruptcy Lawyers
• Business Lawyers
• Criminal Lawyers
• Employment Lawyers
• Estate Planning Lawyers
• Family Lawyers
• Personal Injury Lawyers
• Estate Planning
• Personal Injury
• Business Formation
• Business Operations
• Intellectual Property
• International Trade
• Real Estate
• Financial Aid
• Course Outlines
• Law Journals
• US Constitution
• Regulations
• Supreme Court
• Circuit Courts
• District Courts
• Dockets & Filings
• State Constitutions
• State Codes
• State Case Law
• Legal Blogs
• Business Forms
• Product Recalls
• Justia Connect Membership
• Justia Premium Placements
• Justia Elevate (SEO, Websites)
• Justia Amplify (PPC, GBP)
• Testimonials