what is assumption and hypothesis in research

Assumption vs. Hypothesis

What's the difference.

Assumption and hypothesis are both concepts used in research and reasoning, but they differ in their nature and purpose. An assumption is a belief or statement that is taken for granted or accepted as true without any evidence or proof. It is often used as a starting point or a premise in an argument or analysis. On the other hand, a hypothesis is a tentative explanation or prediction that is based on limited evidence or prior knowledge. It is formulated to be tested and verified through empirical research or experimentation. While assumptions are often subjective and can be biased, hypotheses are more objective and aim to provide a basis for scientific investigation.

Further Detail

Introduction.

Assumptions and hypotheses are fundamental concepts in the fields of logic, science, and research. While they share some similarities, they also have distinct attributes that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the characteristics of assumptions and hypotheses, their roles in different contexts, and how they contribute to the process of knowledge acquisition and problem-solving.

Assumptions

An assumption is a belief or statement that is taken for granted or accepted as true without any proof or evidence. It serves as a starting point for reasoning or argumentation. Assumptions can be based on personal experiences, cultural norms, or generalizations. They are often used to fill in gaps in knowledge or to simplify complex situations.

One key attribute of assumptions is that they are not necessarily true or proven. They are subjective and can vary from person to person. Assumptions can be implicit, meaning they are not explicitly stated, or explicit, where they are clearly expressed. They can also be conscious or unconscious, depending on whether we are aware of them or not.

Assumptions play a crucial role in everyday life, decision-making, and problem-solving. They help us make sense of the world and navigate through uncertain situations. However, it is important to recognize that assumptions can introduce biases and limit our understanding if they are not critically examined or challenged.

A hypothesis, on the other hand, is a tentative explanation or prediction that is based on limited evidence or prior knowledge. It is formulated as a testable statement that can be supported or refuted through empirical observation or experimentation. Hypotheses are commonly used in scientific research to guide investigations and generate new knowledge.

Unlike assumptions, hypotheses are grounded in evidence and are subject to verification. They are formulated based on existing theories, observations, or logical reasoning. Hypotheses are often stated in the form of "if-then" statements, where the independent variable (the "if" part) is manipulated or observed to determine its effect on the dependent variable (the "then" part).

Hypotheses are essential in the scientific method, as they provide a framework for conducting experiments and gathering data. They allow researchers to make predictions and draw conclusions based on empirical evidence. If a hypothesis is supported by the data, it can lead to the development of theories or further research. If it is refuted, it may prompt the formulation of new hypotheses or the revision of existing ones.

Comparison of Attributes

While assumptions and hypotheses share the commonality of being statements or beliefs, they differ in several key attributes:

Assumptions are often based on personal beliefs, experiences, or cultural norms. They can be influenced by subjective factors and may not have a solid foundation in evidence or logic. In contrast, hypotheses are grounded in existing knowledge, theories, or observations. They are formulated based on logical reasoning and are subject to empirical testing.

2. Verifiability

Assumptions are not easily verifiable since they are often subjective or based on incomplete information. They are accepted as true without rigorous testing or evidence. On the other hand, hypotheses are formulated to be testable and verifiable. They can be supported or refuted through empirical observation or experimentation.

Assumptions are primarily used to simplify complex situations, fill in gaps in knowledge, or provide a starting point for reasoning. They are often employed in everyday life, decision-making, and problem-solving. Hypotheses, on the other hand, serve the purpose of generating new knowledge, guiding scientific research, and making predictions about the relationship between variables.

4. Role in Knowledge Acquisition

Assumptions can limit knowledge acquisition if they are not critically examined or challenged. They can introduce biases and prevent us from exploring alternative explanations or perspectives. Hypotheses, on the other hand, contribute to knowledge acquisition by providing a structured approach to testing and refining ideas. They encourage critical thinking, data collection, and analysis.

5. Testability

Assumptions are often difficult to test since they are not formulated as specific statements or predictions. They are more subjective in nature and may not lend themselves to empirical verification. Hypotheses, on the other hand, are designed to be testable. They are formulated as specific statements that can be supported or refuted through observation or experimentation.

Assumptions and hypotheses are both important concepts in reasoning, problem-solving, and scientific research. While assumptions provide a starting point for reasoning and decision-making, hypotheses offer a structured approach to generating new knowledge and making predictions. Understanding the attributes and differences between assumptions and hypotheses is crucial for critical thinking, avoiding biases, and advancing our understanding of the world.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.

• Resources Home 🏠
• Try SciSpace Copilot
• Search research papers
• Add Copilot Extension
• Try AI Detector
• Try Paraphraser
• Try Citation Generator
• April Papers
• June Papers
• July Papers

The Craft of Writing a Strong Hypothesis

Table of Contents

Writing a hypothesis is one of the essential elements of a scientific research paper. It needs to be to the point, clearly communicating what your research is trying to accomplish. A blurry, drawn-out, or complexly-structured hypothesis can confuse your readers. Or worse, the editor and peer reviewers.

A captivating hypothesis is not too intricate. This blog will take you through the process so that, by the end of it, you have a better idea of how to convey your research paper's intent in just one sentence.

What is a Hypothesis?

The first step in your scientific endeavor, a hypothesis, is a strong, concise statement that forms the basis of your research. It is not the same as a thesis statement , which is a brief summary of your research paper .

The sole purpose of a hypothesis is to predict your paper's findings, data, and conclusion. It comes from a place of curiosity and intuition . When you write a hypothesis, you're essentially making an educated guess based on scientific prejudices and evidence, which is further proven or disproven through the scientific method.

The reason for undertaking research is to observe a specific phenomenon. A hypothesis, therefore, lays out what the said phenomenon is. And it does so through two variables, an independent and dependent variable.

The independent variable is the cause behind the observation, while the dependent variable is the effect of the cause. A good example of this is “mixing red and blue forms purple.” In this hypothesis, mixing red and blue is the independent variable as you're combining the two colors at your own will. The formation of purple is the dependent variable as, in this case, it is conditional to the independent variable.

Different Types of Hypotheses‌

Types of hypotheses

Some would stand by the notion that there are only two types of hypotheses: a Null hypothesis and an Alternative hypothesis. While that may have some truth to it, it would be better to fully distinguish the most common forms as these terms come up so often, which might leave you out of context.

Apart from Null and Alternative, there are Complex, Simple, Directional, Non-Directional, Statistical, and Associative and casual hypotheses. They don't necessarily have to be exclusive, as one hypothesis can tick many boxes, but knowing the distinctions between them will make it easier for you to construct your own.

1. Null hypothesis

A null hypothesis proposes no relationship between two variables. Denoted by H 0 , it is a negative statement like “Attending physiotherapy sessions does not affect athletes' on-field performance.” Here, the author claims physiotherapy sessions have no effect on on-field performances. Even if there is, it's only a coincidence.

2. Alternative hypothesis

Considered to be the opposite of a null hypothesis, an alternative hypothesis is donated as H1 or Ha. It explicitly states that the dependent variable affects the independent variable. A good  alternative hypothesis example is “Attending physiotherapy sessions improves athletes' on-field performance.” or “Water evaporates at 100 °C. ” The alternative hypothesis further branches into directional and non-directional.

• Directional hypothesis: A hypothesis that states the result would be either positive or negative is called directional hypothesis. It accompanies H1 with either the ‘<' or ‘>' sign.
• Non-directional hypothesis: A non-directional hypothesis only claims an effect on the dependent variable. It does not clarify whether the result would be positive or negative. The sign for a non-directional hypothesis is ‘≠.'

3. Simple hypothesis

A simple hypothesis is a statement made to reflect the relation between exactly two variables. One independent and one dependent. Consider the example, “Smoking is a prominent cause of lung cancer." The dependent variable, lung cancer, is dependent on the independent variable, smoking.

4. Complex hypothesis

In contrast to a simple hypothesis, a complex hypothesis implies the relationship between multiple independent and dependent variables. For instance, “Individuals who eat more fruits tend to have higher immunity, lesser cholesterol, and high metabolism.” The independent variable is eating more fruits, while the dependent variables are higher immunity, lesser cholesterol, and high metabolism.

5. Associative and casual hypothesis

Associative and casual hypotheses don't exhibit how many variables there will be. They define the relationship between the variables. In an associative hypothesis, changing any one variable, dependent or independent, affects others. In a casual hypothesis, the independent variable directly affects the dependent.

6. Empirical hypothesis

Also referred to as the working hypothesis, an empirical hypothesis claims a theory's validation via experiments and observation. This way, the statement appears justifiable and different from a wild guess.

Say, the hypothesis is “Women who take iron tablets face a lesser risk of anemia than those who take vitamin B12.” This is an example of an empirical hypothesis where the researcher  the statement after assessing a group of women who take iron tablets and charting the findings.

7. Statistical hypothesis

The point of a statistical hypothesis is to test an already existing hypothesis by studying a population sample. Hypothesis like “44% of the Indian population belong in the age group of 22-27.” leverage evidence to prove or disprove a particular statement.

Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis

Writing a hypothesis is essential as it can make or break your research for you. That includes your chances of getting published in a journal. So when you're designing one, keep an eye out for these pointers:

• A research hypothesis has to be simple yet clear to look justifiable enough.
• It has to be testable — your research would be rendered pointless if too far-fetched into reality or limited by technology.
• It has to be precise about the results —what you are trying to do and achieve through it should come out in your hypothesis.
• A research hypothesis should be self-explanatory, leaving no doubt in the reader's mind.
• If you are developing a relational hypothesis, you need to include the variables and establish an appropriate relationship among them.
• A hypothesis must keep and reflect the scope for further investigations and experiments.

Separating a Hypothesis from a Prediction

Outside of academia, hypothesis and prediction are often used interchangeably. In research writing, this is not only confusing but also incorrect. And although a hypothesis and prediction are guesses at their core, there are many differences between them.

A hypothesis is an educated guess or even a testable prediction validated through research. It aims to analyze the gathered evidence and facts to define a relationship between variables and put forth a logical explanation behind the nature of events.

Predictions are assumptions or expected outcomes made without any backing evidence. They are more fictionally inclined regardless of where they originate from.

For this reason, a hypothesis holds much more weight than a prediction. It sticks to the scientific method rather than pure guesswork. "Planets revolve around the Sun." is an example of a hypothesis as it is previous knowledge and observed trends. Additionally, we can test it through the scientific method.

Whereas "COVID-19 will be eradicated by 2030." is a prediction. Even though it results from past trends, we can't prove or disprove it. So, the only way this gets validated is to wait and watch if COVID-19 cases end by 2030.

Finally, How to Write a Hypothesis

Quick tips on writing a hypothesis

1.  Be clear about your research question

A hypothesis should instantly address the research question or the problem statement. To do so, you need to ask a question. Understand the constraints of your undertaken research topic and then formulate a simple and topic-centric problem. Only after that can you develop a hypothesis and further test for evidence.

2. Carry out a recce

Once you have your research's foundation laid out, it would be best to conduct preliminary research. Go through previous theories, academic papers, data, and experiments before you start curating your research hypothesis. It will give you an idea of your hypothesis's viability or originality.

Making use of references from relevant research papers helps draft a good research hypothesis. SciSpace Discover offers a repository of over 270 million research papers to browse through and gain a deeper understanding of related studies on a particular topic. Additionally, you can use SciSpace Copilot , your AI research assistant, for reading any lengthy research paper and getting a more summarized context of it. A hypothesis can be formed after evaluating many such summarized research papers. Copilot also offers explanations for theories and equations, explains paper in simplified version, allows you to highlight any text in the paper or clip math equations and tables and provides a deeper, clear understanding of what is being said. This can improve the hypothesis by helping you identify potential research gaps.

3. Create a 3-dimensional hypothesis

Variables are an essential part of any reasonable hypothesis. So, identify your independent and dependent variable(s) and form a correlation between them. The ideal way to do this is to write the hypothetical assumption in the ‘if-then' form. If you use this form, make sure that you state the predefined relationship between the variables.

In another way, you can choose to present your hypothesis as a comparison between two variables. Here, you must specify the difference you expect to observe in the results.

4. Write the first draft

Now that everything is in place, it's time to write your hypothesis. For starters, create the first draft. In this version, write what you expect to find from your research.

Clearly separate your independent and dependent variables and the link between them. Don't fixate on syntax at this stage. The goal is to ensure your hypothesis addresses the issue.

5. Proof your hypothesis

After preparing the first draft of your hypothesis, you need to inspect it thoroughly. It should tick all the boxes, like being concise, straightforward, relevant, and accurate. Your final hypothesis has to be well-structured as well.

Research projects are an exciting and crucial part of being a scholar. And once you have your research question, you need a great hypothesis to begin conducting research. Thus, knowing how to write a hypothesis is very important.

Now that you have a firmer grasp on what a good hypothesis constitutes, the different kinds there are, and what process to follow, you will find it much easier to write your hypothesis, which ultimately helps your research.

Now it's easier than ever to streamline your research workflow with SciSpace Discover . Its integrated, comprehensive end-to-end platform for research allows scholars to easily discover, write and publish their research and fosters collaboration.

It includes everything you need, including a repository of over 270 million research papers across disciplines, SEO-optimized summaries and public profiles to show your expertise and experience.

If you found these tips on writing a research hypothesis useful, head over to our blog on Statistical Hypothesis Testing to learn about the top researchers, papers, and institutions in this domain.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. what is the definition of hypothesis.

According to the Oxford dictionary, a hypothesis is defined as “An idea or explanation of something that is based on a few known facts, but that has not yet been proved to be true or correct”.

2. What is an example of hypothesis?

The hypothesis is a statement that proposes a relationship between two or more variables. An example: "If we increase the number of new users who join our platform by 25%, then we will see an increase in revenue."

3. What is an example of null hypothesis?

A null hypothesis is a statement that there is no relationship between two variables. The null hypothesis is written as H0. The null hypothesis states that there is no effect. For example, if you're studying whether or not a particular type of exercise increases strength, your null hypothesis will be "there is no difference in strength between people who exercise and people who don't."

4. What are the types of research?

• Fundamental research

• Applied research

• Qualitative research

• Quantitative research

• Mixed research

• Exploratory research

• Longitudinal research

• Cross-sectional research

• Field research

• Laboratory research

• Fixed research

• Flexible research

• Action research

• Policy research

• Classification research

• Comparative research

• Causal research

• Inductive research

• Deductive research

5. How to write a hypothesis?

• Your hypothesis should be able to predict the relationship and outcome.

• Avoid wordiness by keeping it simple and brief.

• Your hypothesis should contain observable and testable outcomes.

• Your hypothesis should be relevant to the research question.

6. What are the 2 types of hypothesis?

• Null hypotheses are used to test the claim that "there is no difference between two groups of data".

• Alternative hypotheses test the claim that "there is a difference between two data groups".

7. Difference between research question and research hypothesis?

A research question is a broad, open-ended question you will try to answer through your research. A hypothesis is a statement based on prior research or theory that you expect to be true due to your study. Example - Research question: What are the factors that influence the adoption of the new technology? Research hypothesis: There is a positive relationship between age, education and income level with the adoption of the new technology.

8. What is plural for hypothesis?

The plural of hypothesis is hypotheses. Here's an example of how it would be used in a statement, "Numerous well-considered hypotheses are presented in this part, and they are supported by tables and figures that are well-illustrated."

9. What is the red queen hypothesis?

The red queen hypothesis in evolutionary biology states that species must constantly evolve to avoid extinction because if they don't, they will be outcompeted by other species that are evolving. Leigh Van Valen first proposed it in 1973; since then, it has been tested and substantiated many times.

10. Who is known as the father of null hypothesis?

The father of the null hypothesis is Sir Ronald Fisher. He published a paper in 1925 that introduced the concept of null hypothesis testing, and he was also the first to use the term itself.

11. When to reject null hypothesis?

You need to find a significant difference between your two populations to reject the null hypothesis. You can determine that by running statistical tests such as an independent sample t-test or a dependent sample t-test. You should reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than 0.05.

You might also like

Consensus GPT vs. SciSpace GPT: Choose the Best GPT for Research

Literature Review and Theoretical Framework: Understanding the Differences

Types of Essays in Academic Writing - Quick Guide (2024)

Difference Between | Descriptive Analysis and Comparisons

Search form, difference between hypothesis and assumption.

Key Difference: A hypothesis is an uncertain supposition or explanation regarding a phenomenon or event. It is considered to be true by the researcher. An assumption is also a kind of belief which is considered to be true.  A hypothesis must always go through the process of verification and investigation. On the other hand, an assumption may or may not be verified or investigated. In research, assumption denotes the existence of the relationship between the variables. A hypothesis establishes the relationship determined by an assumption.

According to Tuckman, these three criteria should be kept in mind before stating a hypothesis –

 A good hypothesis statement should

• conjecture the direction of the relationship between two or more  variables,
• be stated clearly and unambiguously in the form of a  declarative sentence, and
• be testable; that is, it should allow restatement  in an operational form that can then be evaluated based on data

'My assumption is that tomorrow Mary will bring snacks for all'.

Assumption and hypothesis often create confusion as both are widely used in the field of research. An assumption is about taking things for granted, without having any firm explanation behind it. On the other hand, hypothesis is a type of assumption for a certain purpose of argument. However, both are not already proved.  An assumption is always assumed to be true. On the other hand, a hypothesis is regarding statements that need certain investigation. In research, assumptions are formulated and on the basis of the assumptions certain hypothesis statements are declared. Thus, a hypothesis can also be considered as an assumption that is taken to be true unless proven otherwise.

Comparison between Hypothesis and Assumption –

Image Courtesy: biology.iupui.edu, b2b-im.com

Add new comment

Copyright © 2024, Difference Between | Descriptive Analysis and Comparisons

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples

How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples

Published on May 6, 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on November 20, 2023.

A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research. If you want to test a relationship between two or more variables, you need to write hypotheses before you start your experiment or data collection .

Example: Hypothesis

Daily apple consumption leads to fewer doctor’s visits.

Table of contents

What is a hypothesis, developing a hypothesis (with example), hypothesis examples, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about writing hypotheses.

A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.

A hypothesis is not just a guess – it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

Variables in hypotheses

Hypotheses propose a relationship between two or more types of variables .

• An independent variable is something the researcher changes or controls.
• A dependent variable is something the researcher observes and measures.

If there are any control variables , extraneous variables , or confounding variables , be sure to jot those down as you go to minimize the chances that research bias  will affect your results.

In this example, the independent variable is exposure to the sun – the assumed cause . The dependent variable is the level of happiness – the assumed effect .

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Step 1. Ask a question

Writing a hypothesis begins with a research question that you want to answer. The question should be focused, specific, and researchable within the constraints of your project.

Step 2. Do some preliminary research

Your initial answer to the question should be based on what is already known about the topic. Look for theories and previous studies to help you form educated assumptions about what your research will find.

At this stage, you might construct a conceptual framework to ensure that you’re embarking on a relevant topic . This can also help you identify which variables you will study and what you think the relationships are between them. Sometimes, you’ll have to operationalize more complex constructs.

Step 3. Formulate your hypothesis

Now you should have some idea of what you expect to find. Write your initial answer to the question in a clear, concise sentence.

4. Refine your hypothesis

You need to make sure your hypothesis is specific and testable. There are various ways of phrasing a hypothesis, but all the terms you use should have clear definitions, and the hypothesis should contain:

• The relevant variables
• The specific group being studied
• The predicted outcome of the experiment or analysis

5. Phrase your hypothesis in three ways

To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in  if…then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable.

In academic research, hypotheses are more commonly phrased in terms of correlations or effects, where you directly state the predicted relationship between variables.

If you are comparing two groups, the hypothesis can state what difference you expect to find between them.

6. Write a null hypothesis

If your research involves statistical hypothesis testing , you will also have to write a null hypothesis . The null hypothesis is the default position that there is no association between the variables. The null hypothesis is written as H 0 , while the alternative hypothesis is H 1 or H a .

• H 0 : The number of lectures attended by first-year students has no effect on their final exam scores.
• H 1 : The number of lectures attended by first-year students has a positive effect on their final exam scores.

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

A hypothesis is not just a guess — it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

Null and alternative hypotheses are used in statistical hypothesis testing . The null hypothesis of a test always predicts no effect or no relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis states your research prediction of an effect or relationship.

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, November 20). How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved July 27, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/hypothesis/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, construct validity | definition, types, & examples, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples, operationalization | a guide with examples, pros & cons, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Hypothesis vs. Assumption: What's the Difference?

Key Differences

Comparison chart, role in research, flexibility, hypothesis and assumption definitions, what is a hypothesis, how is a hypothesis used in experiments, what is an assumption, can a hypothesis be proven, are assumptions always false, is a hypothesis necessary in research, can assumptions change, what makes a good hypothesis, do assumptions need evidence, can a hypothesis become a theory, what happens if a hypothesis is disproved, are assumptions helpful in problem-solving, is a hypothesis always correct, can assumptions bias research, are assumptions part of everyday decision-making, do assumptions vary in different fields, why are assumptions necessary in modeling, how does one test a hypothesis, can an assumption be challenged, how does a hypothesis drive scientific inquiry.

Trending Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

New Comparisons

What Is A Research (Scientific) Hypothesis? A plain-language explainer + examples

By:  Derek Jansen (MBA)  | Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | June 2020

If you’re new to the world of research, or it’s your first time writing a dissertation or thesis, you’re probably noticing that the words “research hypothesis” and “scientific hypothesis” are used quite a bit, and you’re wondering what they mean in a research context .

“Hypothesis” is one of those words that people use loosely, thinking they understand what it means. However, it has a very specific meaning within academic research. So, it’s important to understand the exact meaning before you start hypothesizing. 

Research Hypothesis 101

• What is a hypothesis ?
• What is a research hypothesis (scientific hypothesis)?
• Requirements for a research hypothesis
• Definition of a research hypothesis
• The null hypothesis

What is a hypothesis?

Let’s start with the general definition of a hypothesis (not a research hypothesis or scientific hypothesis), according to the Cambridge Dictionary:

Hypothesis: an idea or explanation for something that is based on known facts but has not yet been proved.

In other words, it’s a statement that provides an explanation for why or how something works, based on facts (or some reasonable assumptions), but that has not yet been specifically tested . For example, a hypothesis might look something like this:

Hypothesis: sleep impacts academic performance.

This statement predicts that academic performance will be influenced by the amount and/or quality of sleep a student engages in – sounds reasonable, right? It’s based on reasonable assumptions , underpinned by what we currently know about sleep and health (from the existing literature). So, loosely speaking, we could call it a hypothesis, at least by the dictionary definition.

But that’s not good enough…

Unfortunately, that’s not quite sophisticated enough to describe a research hypothesis (also sometimes called a scientific hypothesis), and it wouldn’t be acceptable in a dissertation, thesis or research paper . In the world of academic research, a statement needs a few more criteria to constitute a true research hypothesis .

What is a research hypothesis?

A research hypothesis (also called a scientific hypothesis) is a statement about the expected outcome of a study (for example, a dissertation or thesis). To constitute a quality hypothesis, the statement needs to have three attributes – specificity , clarity and testability .

Let’s take a look at these more closely.

Need a helping hand?

Hypothesis Essential #1: Specificity & Clarity

A good research hypothesis needs to be extremely clear and articulate about both what’ s being assessed (who or what variables are involved ) and the expected outcome (for example, a difference between groups, a relationship between variables, etc.).

Let’s stick with our sleepy students example and look at how this statement could be more specific and clear.

Hypothesis: Students who sleep at least 8 hours per night will, on average, achieve higher grades in standardised tests than students who sleep less than 8 hours a night.

As you can see, the statement is very specific as it identifies the variables involved (sleep hours and test grades), the parties involved (two groups of students), as well as the predicted relationship type (a positive relationship). There’s no ambiguity or uncertainty about who or what is involved in the statement, and the expected outcome is clear.

Contrast that to the original hypothesis we looked at – “Sleep impacts academic performance” – and you can see the difference. “Sleep” and “academic performance” are both comparatively vague , and there’s no indication of what the expected relationship direction is (more sleep or less sleep). As you can see, specificity and clarity are key.

Hypothesis Essential #2: Testability (Provability)

A statement must be testable to qualify as a research hypothesis. In other words, there needs to be a way to prove (or disprove) the statement. If it’s not testable, it’s not a hypothesis – simple as that.

For example, consider the hypothesis we mentioned earlier:

Hypothesis: Students who sleep at least 8 hours per night will, on average, achieve higher grades in standardised tests than students who sleep less than 8 hours a night.  

We could test this statement by undertaking a quantitative study involving two groups of students, one that gets 8 or more hours of sleep per night for a fixed period, and one that gets less. We could then compare the standardised test results for both groups to see if there’s a statistically significant difference. 

Again, if you compare this to the original hypothesis we looked at – “Sleep impacts academic performance” – you can see that it would be quite difficult to test that statement, primarily because it isn’t specific enough. How much sleep? By who? What type of academic performance?

So, remember the mantra – if you can’t test it, it’s not a hypothesis 🙂

Defining A Research Hypothesis

You’re still with us? Great! Let’s recap and pin down a clear definition of a hypothesis.

A research hypothesis (or scientific hypothesis) is a statement about an expected relationship between variables, or explanation of an occurrence, that is clear, specific and testable.

So, when you write up hypotheses for your dissertation or thesis, make sure that they meet all these criteria. If you do, you’ll not only have rock-solid hypotheses but you’ll also ensure a clear focus for your entire research project.

What about the null hypothesis?

You may have also heard the terms null hypothesis , alternative hypothesis, or H-zero thrown around. At a simple level, the null hypothesis is the counter-proposal to the original hypothesis.

For example, if the hypothesis predicts that there is a relationship between two variables (for example, sleep and academic performance), the null hypothesis would predict that there is no relationship between those variables.

At a more technical level, the null hypothesis proposes that no statistical significance exists in a set of given observations and that any differences are due to chance alone.

And there you have it – hypotheses in a nutshell. 

If you have any questions, be sure to leave a comment below and we’ll do our best to help you. If you need hands-on help developing and testing your hypotheses, consider our private coaching service , where we hold your hand through the research journey.

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

17 Comments

Very useful information. I benefit more from getting more information in this regard.

Very great insight,educative and informative. Please give meet deep critics on many research data of public international Law like human rights, environment, natural resources, law of the sea etc

In a book I read a distinction is made between null, research, and alternative hypothesis. As far as I understand, alternative and research hypotheses are the same. Can you please elaborate? Best Afshin

This is a self explanatory, easy going site. I will recommend this to my friends and colleagues.

Very good definition. How can I cite your definition in my thesis? Thank you. Is nul hypothesis compulsory in a research?

It’s a counter-proposal to be proven as a rejection

Please what is the difference between alternate hypothesis and research hypothesis?

It is a very good explanation. However, it limits hypotheses to statistically tasteable ideas. What about for qualitative researches or other researches that involve quantitative data that don’t need statistical tests?

In qualitative research, one typically uses propositions, not hypotheses.

could you please elaborate it more

I’ve benefited greatly from these notes, thank you.

This is very helpful

well articulated ideas are presented here, thank you for being reliable sources of information

Excellent. Thanks for being clear and sound about the research methodology and hypothesis (quantitative research)

I have only a simple question regarding the null hypothesis. – Is the null hypothesis (Ho) known as the reversible hypothesis of the alternative hypothesis (H1? – How to test it in academic research?

this is very important note help me much more

Hi” best wishes to you and your very nice blog” 

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

• What Is Research Methodology? Simple Definition (With Examples) - Grad Coach - […] Contrasted to this, a quantitative methodology is typically used when the research aims and objectives are confirmatory in nature. For example,…

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey

What is a Research Hypothesis: How to Write it, Types, and Examples

Any research begins with a research question and a research hypothesis . A research question alone may not suffice to design the experiment(s) needed to answer it. A hypothesis is central to the scientific method. But what is a hypothesis ? A hypothesis is a testable statement that proposes a possible explanation to a phenomenon, and it may include a prediction. Next, you may ask what is a research hypothesis ? Simply put, a research hypothesis is a prediction or educated guess about the relationship between the variables that you want to investigate.  

It is important to be thorough when developing your research hypothesis. Shortcomings in the framing of a hypothesis can affect the study design and the results. A better understanding of the research hypothesis definition and characteristics of a good hypothesis will make it easier for you to develop your own hypothesis for your research. Let’s dive in to know more about the types of research hypothesis , how to write a research hypothesis , and some research hypothesis examples .  

Table of Contents

What is a hypothesis ?  

A hypothesis is based on the existing body of knowledge in a study area. Framed before the data are collected, a hypothesis states the tentative relationship between independent and dependent variables, along with a prediction of the outcome.  

What is a research hypothesis ?  

Young researchers starting out their journey are usually brimming with questions like “ What is a hypothesis ?” “ What is a research hypothesis ?” “How can I write a good research hypothesis ?”   

A research hypothesis is a statement that proposes a possible explanation for an observable phenomenon or pattern. It guides the direction of a study and predicts the outcome of the investigation. A research hypothesis is testable, i.e., it can be supported or disproven through experimentation or observation.     

Characteristics of a good hypothesis  

Here are the characteristics of a good hypothesis :  

• Clearly formulated and free of language errors and ambiguity  
• Concise and not unnecessarily verbose  
• Has clearly defined variables  
• Testable and stated in a way that allows for it to be disproven  
• Can be tested using a research design that is feasible, ethical, and practical   
• Specific and relevant to the research problem  
• Rooted in a thorough literature search  
• Can generate new knowledge or understanding.  

How to create an effective research hypothesis  

A study begins with the formulation of a research question. A researcher then performs background research. This background information forms the basis for building a good research hypothesis . The researcher then performs experiments, collects, and analyzes the data, interprets the findings, and ultimately, determines if the findings support or negate the original hypothesis.  

Let’s look at each step for creating an effective, testable, and good research hypothesis :  

• Identify a research problem or question: Start by identifying a specific research problem.   
• Review the literature: Conduct an in-depth review of the existing literature related to the research problem to grasp the current knowledge and gaps in the field.   
• Formulate a clear and testable hypothesis : Based on the research question, use existing knowledge to form a clear and testable hypothesis . The hypothesis should state a predicted relationship between two or more variables that can be measured and manipulated. Improve the original draft till it is clear and meaningful.  
• State the null hypothesis: The null hypothesis is a statement that there is no relationship between the variables you are studying.   
• Define the population and sample: Clearly define the population you are studying and the sample you will be using for your research.  
• Select appropriate methods for testing the hypothesis: Select appropriate research methods, such as experiments, surveys, or observational studies, which will allow you to test your research hypothesis .  

Remember that creating a research hypothesis is an iterative process, i.e., you might have to revise it based on the data you collect. You may need to test and reject several hypotheses before answering the research problem.  

How to write a research hypothesis  

When you start writing a research hypothesis , you use an “if–then” statement format, which states the predicted relationship between two or more variables. Clearly identify the independent variables (the variables being changed) and the dependent variables (the variables being measured), as well as the population you are studying. Review and revise your hypothesis as needed.  

An example of a research hypothesis in this format is as follows:  

“ If [athletes] follow [cold water showers daily], then their [endurance] increases.”  

Population: athletes  

Independent variable: daily cold water showers  

Dependent variable: endurance  

You may have understood the characteristics of a good hypothesis . But note that a research hypothesis is not always confirmed; a researcher should be prepared to accept or reject the hypothesis based on the study findings.  

Research hypothesis checklist  

Following from above, here is a 10-point checklist for a good research hypothesis :  

• Testable: A research hypothesis should be able to be tested via experimentation or observation.  
• Specific: A research hypothesis should clearly state the relationship between the variables being studied.  
• Based on prior research: A research hypothesis should be based on existing knowledge and previous research in the field.  
• Falsifiable: A research hypothesis should be able to be disproven through testing.  
• Clear and concise: A research hypothesis should be stated in a clear and concise manner.  
• Logical: A research hypothesis should be logical and consistent with current understanding of the subject.  
• Relevant: A research hypothesis should be relevant to the research question and objectives.  
• Feasible: A research hypothesis should be feasible to test within the scope of the study.  
• Reflects the population: A research hypothesis should consider the population or sample being studied.  
• Uncomplicated: A good research hypothesis is written in a way that is easy for the target audience to understand.  

By following this research hypothesis checklist , you will be able to create a research hypothesis that is strong, well-constructed, and more likely to yield meaningful results.  

Types of research hypothesis  

Different types of research hypothesis are used in scientific research:  

1. Null hypothesis:

A null hypothesis states that there is no change in the dependent variable due to changes to the independent variable. This means that the results are due to chance and are not significant. A null hypothesis is denoted as H0 and is stated as the opposite of what the alternative hypothesis states.   

Example: “ The newly identified virus is not zoonotic .”  

2. Alternative hypothesis:

This states that there is a significant difference or relationship between the variables being studied. It is denoted as H1 or Ha and is usually accepted or rejected in favor of the null hypothesis.  

Example: “ The newly identified virus is zoonotic .”  

3. Directional hypothesis :

This specifies the direction of the relationship or difference between variables; therefore, it tends to use terms like increase, decrease, positive, negative, more, or less.   

Example: “ The inclusion of intervention X decreases infant mortality compared to the original treatment .”   

4. Non-directional hypothesis:

While it does not predict the exact direction or nature of the relationship between the two variables, a non-directional hypothesis states the existence of a relationship or difference between variables but not the direction, nature, or magnitude of the relationship. A non-directional hypothesis may be used when there is no underlying theory or when findings contradict previous research.  

Example, “ Cats and dogs differ in the amount of affection they express .”  

5. Simple hypothesis :

A simple hypothesis only predicts the relationship between one independent and another independent variable.  

Example: “ Applying sunscreen every day slows skin aging .”  

6 . Complex hypothesis :

A complex hypothesis states the relationship or difference between two or more independent and dependent variables.   

Example: “ Applying sunscreen every day slows skin aging, reduces sun burn, and reduces the chances of skin cancer .” (Here, the three dependent variables are slowing skin aging, reducing sun burn, and reducing the chances of skin cancer.)  

7. Associative hypothesis:  

An associative hypothesis states that a change in one variable results in the change of the other variable. The associative hypothesis defines interdependency between variables.  

Example: “ There is a positive association between physical activity levels and overall health .”  

8 . Causal hypothesis:

A causal hypothesis proposes a cause-and-effect interaction between variables.  

Example: “ Long-term alcohol use causes liver damage .”  

Note that some of the types of research hypothesis mentioned above might overlap. The types of hypothesis chosen will depend on the research question and the objective of the study.  

Research hypothesis examples  

Here are some good research hypothesis examples :  

“The use of a specific type of therapy will lead to a reduction in symptoms of depression in individuals with a history of major depressive disorder.”  

“Providing educational interventions on healthy eating habits will result in weight loss in overweight individuals.”  

“Plants that are exposed to certain types of music will grow taller than those that are not exposed to music.”  

“The use of the plant growth regulator X will lead to an increase in the number of flowers produced by plants.”  

Characteristics that make a research hypothesis weak are unclear variables, unoriginality, being too general or too vague, and being untestable. A weak hypothesis leads to weak research and improper methods.   

Some bad research hypothesis examples (and the reasons why they are “bad”) are as follows:  

“This study will show that treatment X is better than any other treatment . ” (This statement is not testable, too broad, and does not consider other treatments that may be effective.)  

“This study will prove that this type of therapy is effective for all mental disorders . ” (This statement is too broad and not testable as mental disorders are complex and different disorders may respond differently to different types of therapy.)  

“Plants can communicate with each other through telepathy . ” (This statement is not testable and lacks a scientific basis.)  

Importance of testable hypothesis  

If a research hypothesis is not testable, the results will not prove or disprove anything meaningful. The conclusions will be vague at best. A testable hypothesis helps a researcher focus on the study outcome and understand the implication of the question and the different variables involved. A testable hypothesis helps a researcher make precise predictions based on prior research.  

To be considered testable, there must be a way to prove that the hypothesis is true or false; further, the results of the hypothesis must be reproducible.  

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on research hypothesis  

1. What is the difference between research question and research hypothesis ?  

A research question defines the problem and helps outline the study objective(s). It is an open-ended statement that is exploratory or probing in nature. Therefore, it does not make predictions or assumptions. It helps a researcher identify what information to collect. A research hypothesis , however, is a specific, testable prediction about the relationship between variables. Accordingly, it guides the study design and data analysis approach.

2. When to reject null hypothesis ?

A null hypothesis should be rejected when the evidence from a statistical test shows that it is unlikely to be true. This happens when the test statistic (e.g., p -value) is less than the defined significance level (e.g., 0.05). Rejecting the null hypothesis does not necessarily mean that the alternative hypothesis is true; it simply means that the evidence found is not compatible with the null hypothesis.  

3. How can I be sure my hypothesis is testable?  

A testable hypothesis should be specific and measurable, and it should state a clear relationship between variables that can be tested with data. To ensure that your hypothesis is testable, consider the following:  

• Clearly define the key variables in your hypothesis. You should be able to measure and manipulate these variables in a way that allows you to test the hypothesis.  
• The hypothesis should predict a specific outcome or relationship between variables that can be measured or quantified.   
• You should be able to collect the necessary data within the constraints of your study.  
• It should be possible for other researchers to replicate your study, using the same methods and variables.   
• Your hypothesis should be testable by using appropriate statistical analysis techniques, so you can draw conclusions, and make inferences about the population from the sample data.  
• The hypothesis should be able to be disproven or rejected through the collection of data.  

4. How do I revise my research hypothesis if my data does not support it?  

If your data does not support your research hypothesis , you will need to revise it or develop a new one. You should examine your data carefully and identify any patterns or anomalies, re-examine your research question, and/or revisit your theory to look for any alternative explanations for your results. Based on your review of the data, literature, and theories, modify your research hypothesis to better align it with the results you obtained. Use your revised hypothesis to guide your research design and data collection. It is important to remain objective throughout the process.  

5. I am performing exploratory research. Do I need to formulate a research hypothesis?  

As opposed to “confirmatory” research, where a researcher has some idea about the relationship between the variables under investigation, exploratory research (or hypothesis-generating research) looks into a completely new topic about which limited information is available. Therefore, the researcher will not have any prior hypotheses. In such cases, a researcher will need to develop a post-hoc hypothesis. A post-hoc research hypothesis is generated after these results are known.  

6. How is a research hypothesis different from a research question?

A research question is an inquiry about a specific topic or phenomenon, typically expressed as a question. It seeks to explore and understand a particular aspect of the research subject. In contrast, a research hypothesis is a specific statement or prediction that suggests an expected relationship between variables. It is formulated based on existing knowledge or theories and guides the research design and data analysis.

7. Can a research hypothesis change during the research process?

Yes, research hypotheses can change during the research process. As researchers collect and analyze data, new insights and information may emerge that require modification or refinement of the initial hypotheses. This can be due to unexpected findings, limitations in the original hypotheses, or the need to explore additional dimensions of the research topic. Flexibility is crucial in research, allowing for adaptation and adjustment of hypotheses to align with the evolving understanding of the subject matter.

8. How many hypotheses should be included in a research study?

The number of research hypotheses in a research study varies depending on the nature and scope of the research. It is not necessary to have multiple hypotheses in every study. Some studies may have only one primary hypothesis, while others may have several related hypotheses. The number of hypotheses should be determined based on the research objectives, research questions, and the complexity of the research topic. It is important to ensure that the hypotheses are focused, testable, and directly related to the research aims.

9. Can research hypotheses be used in qualitative research?

Yes, research hypotheses can be used in qualitative research, although they are more commonly associated with quantitative research. In qualitative research, hypotheses may be formulated as tentative or exploratory statements that guide the investigation. Instead of testing hypotheses through statistical analysis, qualitative researchers may use the hypotheses to guide data collection and analysis, seeking to uncover patterns, themes, or relationships within the qualitative data. The emphasis in qualitative research is often on generating insights and understanding rather than confirming or rejecting specific research hypotheses through statistical testing.

Editage All Access is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Editage All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.  

Based on 22+ years of experience in academia, Editage All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place –  Get All Access now starting at just $14 a month !    

Related Posts

What is Thematic Analysis and How to Do It (with Examples)

What Skills are Required for Academic Writing

• Privacy Policy

Home » What is a Hypothesis – Types, Examples and Writing Guide

What is a Hypothesis – Types, Examples and Writing Guide

Table of Contents

Definition:

Hypothesis is an educated guess or proposed explanation for a phenomenon, based on some initial observations or data. It is a tentative statement that can be tested and potentially proven or disproven through further investigation and experimentation.

Hypothesis is often used in scientific research to guide the design of experiments and the collection and analysis of data. It is an essential element of the scientific method, as it allows researchers to make predictions about the outcome of their experiments and to test those predictions to determine their accuracy.

Types of Hypothesis

Types of Hypothesis are as follows:

Research Hypothesis

A research hypothesis is a statement that predicts a relationship between variables. It is usually formulated as a specific statement that can be tested through research, and it is often used in scientific research to guide the design of experiments.

Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis is a statement that assumes there is no significant difference or relationship between variables. It is often used as a starting point for testing the research hypothesis, and if the results of the study reject the null hypothesis, it suggests that there is a significant difference or relationship between variables.

Alternative Hypothesis

An alternative hypothesis is a statement that assumes there is a significant difference or relationship between variables. It is often used as an alternative to the null hypothesis and is tested against the null hypothesis to determine which statement is more accurate.

Directional Hypothesis

A directional hypothesis is a statement that predicts the direction of the relationship between variables. For example, a researcher might predict that increasing the amount of exercise will result in a decrease in body weight.

Non-directional Hypothesis

A non-directional hypothesis is a statement that predicts the relationship between variables but does not specify the direction. For example, a researcher might predict that there is a relationship between the amount of exercise and body weight, but they do not specify whether increasing or decreasing exercise will affect body weight.

Statistical Hypothesis

A statistical hypothesis is a statement that assumes a particular statistical model or distribution for the data. It is often used in statistical analysis to test the significance of a particular result.

Composite Hypothesis

A composite hypothesis is a statement that assumes more than one condition or outcome. It can be divided into several sub-hypotheses, each of which represents a different possible outcome.

Empirical Hypothesis

An empirical hypothesis is a statement that is based on observed phenomena or data. It is often used in scientific research to develop theories or models that explain the observed phenomena.

Simple Hypothesis

A simple hypothesis is a statement that assumes only one outcome or condition. It is often used in scientific research to test a single variable or factor.

Complex Hypothesis

A complex hypothesis is a statement that assumes multiple outcomes or conditions. It is often used in scientific research to test the effects of multiple variables or factors on a particular outcome.

Applications of Hypothesis

Hypotheses are used in various fields to guide research and make predictions about the outcomes of experiments or observations. Here are some examples of how hypotheses are applied in different fields:

• Science : In scientific research, hypotheses are used to test the validity of theories and models that explain natural phenomena. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a particular variable on a natural system, such as the effects of climate change on an ecosystem.
• Medicine : In medical research, hypotheses are used to test the effectiveness of treatments and therapies for specific conditions. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a new drug on a particular disease.
• Psychology : In psychology, hypotheses are used to test theories and models of human behavior and cognition. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a particular stimulus on the brain or behavior.
• Sociology : In sociology, hypotheses are used to test theories and models of social phenomena, such as the effects of social structures or institutions on human behavior. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of income inequality on crime rates.
• Business : In business research, hypotheses are used to test the validity of theories and models that explain business phenomena, such as consumer behavior or market trends. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a new marketing campaign on consumer buying behavior.
• Engineering : In engineering, hypotheses are used to test the effectiveness of new technologies or designs. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the efficiency of a new solar panel design.

How to write a Hypothesis

Here are the steps to follow when writing a hypothesis:

Identify the Research Question

The first step is to identify the research question that you want to answer through your study. This question should be clear, specific, and focused. It should be something that can be investigated empirically and that has some relevance or significance in the field.

Conduct a Literature Review

Before writing your hypothesis, it’s essential to conduct a thorough literature review to understand what is already known about the topic. This will help you to identify the research gap and formulate a hypothesis that builds on existing knowledge.

Determine the Variables

The next step is to identify the variables involved in the research question. A variable is any characteristic or factor that can vary or change. There are two types of variables: independent and dependent. The independent variable is the one that is manipulated or changed by the researcher, while the dependent variable is the one that is measured or observed as a result of the independent variable.

Formulate the Hypothesis

Based on the research question and the variables involved, you can now formulate your hypothesis. A hypothesis should be a clear and concise statement that predicts the relationship between the variables. It should be testable through empirical research and based on existing theory or evidence.

Write the Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis is the opposite of the alternative hypothesis, which is the hypothesis that you are testing. The null hypothesis states that there is no significant difference or relationship between the variables. It is important to write the null hypothesis because it allows you to compare your results with what would be expected by chance.

Refine the Hypothesis

After formulating the hypothesis, it’s important to refine it and make it more precise. This may involve clarifying the variables, specifying the direction of the relationship, or making the hypothesis more testable.

Examples of Hypothesis

Here are a few examples of hypotheses in different fields:

• Psychology : “Increased exposure to violent video games leads to increased aggressive behavior in adolescents.”
• Biology : “Higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will lead to increased plant growth.”
• Sociology : “Individuals who grow up in households with higher socioeconomic status will have higher levels of education and income as adults.”
• Education : “Implementing a new teaching method will result in higher student achievement scores.”
• Marketing : “Customers who receive a personalized email will be more likely to make a purchase than those who receive a generic email.”
• Physics : “An increase in temperature will cause an increase in the volume of a gas, assuming all other variables remain constant.”
• Medicine : “Consuming a diet high in saturated fats will increase the risk of developing heart disease.”

Purpose of Hypothesis

The purpose of a hypothesis is to provide a testable explanation for an observed phenomenon or a prediction of a future outcome based on existing knowledge or theories. A hypothesis is an essential part of the scientific method and helps to guide the research process by providing a clear focus for investigation. It enables scientists to design experiments or studies to gather evidence and data that can support or refute the proposed explanation or prediction.

The formulation of a hypothesis is based on existing knowledge, observations, and theories, and it should be specific, testable, and falsifiable. A specific hypothesis helps to define the research question, which is important in the research process as it guides the selection of an appropriate research design and methodology. Testability of the hypothesis means that it can be proven or disproven through empirical data collection and analysis. Falsifiability means that the hypothesis should be formulated in such a way that it can be proven wrong if it is incorrect.

In addition to guiding the research process, the testing of hypotheses can lead to new discoveries and advancements in scientific knowledge. When a hypothesis is supported by the data, it can be used to develop new theories or models to explain the observed phenomenon. When a hypothesis is not supported by the data, it can help to refine existing theories or prompt the development of new hypotheses to explain the phenomenon.

When to use Hypothesis

Here are some common situations in which hypotheses are used:

• In scientific research , hypotheses are used to guide the design of experiments and to help researchers make predictions about the outcomes of those experiments.
• In social science research , hypotheses are used to test theories about human behavior, social relationships, and other phenomena.
• I n business , hypotheses can be used to guide decisions about marketing, product development, and other areas. For example, a hypothesis might be that a new product will sell well in a particular market, and this hypothesis can be tested through market research.

Characteristics of Hypothesis

Here are some common characteristics of a hypothesis:

• Testable : A hypothesis must be able to be tested through observation or experimentation. This means that it must be possible to collect data that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
• Falsifiable : A hypothesis must be able to be proven false if it is not supported by the data. If a hypothesis cannot be falsified, then it is not a scientific hypothesis.
• Clear and concise : A hypothesis should be stated in a clear and concise manner so that it can be easily understood and tested.
• Based on existing knowledge : A hypothesis should be based on existing knowledge and research in the field. It should not be based on personal beliefs or opinions.
• Specific : A hypothesis should be specific in terms of the variables being tested and the predicted outcome. This will help to ensure that the research is focused and well-designed.
• Tentative: A hypothesis is a tentative statement or assumption that requires further testing and evidence to be confirmed or refuted. It is not a final conclusion or assertion.
• Relevant : A hypothesis should be relevant to the research question or problem being studied. It should address a gap in knowledge or provide a new perspective on the issue.

Advantages of Hypothesis

Hypotheses have several advantages in scientific research and experimentation:

• Guides research: A hypothesis provides a clear and specific direction for research. It helps to focus the research question, select appropriate methods and variables, and interpret the results.
• Predictive powe r: A hypothesis makes predictions about the outcome of research, which can be tested through experimentation. This allows researchers to evaluate the validity of the hypothesis and make new discoveries.
• Facilitates communication: A hypothesis provides a common language and framework for scientists to communicate with one another about their research. This helps to facilitate the exchange of ideas and promotes collaboration.
• Efficient use of resources: A hypothesis helps researchers to use their time, resources, and funding efficiently by directing them towards specific research questions and methods that are most likely to yield results.
• Provides a basis for further research: A hypothesis that is supported by data provides a basis for further research and exploration. It can lead to new hypotheses, theories, and discoveries.
• Increases objectivity: A hypothesis can help to increase objectivity in research by providing a clear and specific framework for testing and interpreting results. This can reduce bias and increase the reliability of research findings.

Limitations of Hypothesis

Some Limitations of the Hypothesis are as follows:

• Limited to observable phenomena: Hypotheses are limited to observable phenomena and cannot account for unobservable or intangible factors. This means that some research questions may not be amenable to hypothesis testing.
• May be inaccurate or incomplete: Hypotheses are based on existing knowledge and research, which may be incomplete or inaccurate. This can lead to flawed hypotheses and erroneous conclusions.
• May be biased: Hypotheses may be biased by the researcher’s own beliefs, values, or assumptions. This can lead to selective interpretation of data and a lack of objectivity in research.
• Cannot prove causation: A hypothesis can only show a correlation between variables, but it cannot prove causation. This requires further experimentation and analysis.
• Limited to specific contexts: Hypotheses are limited to specific contexts and may not be generalizable to other situations or populations. This means that results may not be applicable in other contexts or may require further testing.
• May be affected by chance : Hypotheses may be affected by chance or random variation, which can obscure or distort the true relationship between variables.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Significance of the Study – Examples and Writing...

References in Research – Types, Examples and...

Tables in Research Paper – Types, Creating Guide...

Thesis – Structure, Example and Writing Guide

Informed Consent in Research – Types, Templates...

Research Problem – Examples, Types and Guide

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer
• QuestionPro

• Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case NPS+ Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
• Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home Market Research

Research Hypothesis: What It Is, Types + How to Develop?

A research study starts with a question. Researchers worldwide ask questions and create research hypotheses. The effectiveness of research relies on developing a good research hypothesis. Examples of research hypotheses can guide researchers in writing effective ones.

In this blog, we’ll learn what a research hypothesis is, why it’s important in research, and the different types used in science. We’ll also guide you through creating your research hypothesis and discussing ways to test and evaluate it.

What is a Research Hypothesis?

A hypothesis is like a guess or idea that you suggest to check if it’s true. A research hypothesis is a statement that brings up a question and predicts what might happen.

It’s really important in the scientific method and is used in experiments to figure things out. Essentially, it’s an educated guess about how things are connected in the research.

A research hypothesis usually includes pointing out the independent variable (the thing they’re changing or studying) and the dependent variable (the result they’re measuring or watching). It helps plan how to gather and analyze data to see if there’s evidence to support or deny the expected connection between these variables.

Importance of Hypothesis in Research

Hypotheses are really important in research. They help design studies, allow for practical testing, and add to our scientific knowledge. Their main role is to organize research projects, making them purposeful, focused, and valuable to the scientific community. Let’s look at some key reasons why they matter:

• A research hypothesis helps test theories.

A hypothesis plays a pivotal role in the scientific method by providing a basis for testing existing theories. For example, a hypothesis might test the predictive power of a psychological theory on human behavior.

• It serves as a great platform for investigation activities.

It serves as a launching pad for investigation activities, which offers researchers a clear starting point. A research hypothesis can explore the relationship between exercise and stress reduction.

• Hypothesis guides the research work or study.

A well-formulated hypothesis guides the entire research process. It ensures that the study remains focused and purposeful. For instance, a hypothesis about the impact of social media on interpersonal relationships provides clear guidance for a study.

• Hypothesis sometimes suggests theories.

In some cases, a hypothesis can suggest new theories or modifications to existing ones. For example, a hypothesis testing the effectiveness of a new drug might prompt a reconsideration of current medical theories.

• It helps in knowing the data needs.

A hypothesis clarifies the data requirements for a study, ensuring that researchers collect the necessary information—a hypothesis guiding the collection of demographic data to analyze the influence of age on a particular phenomenon.

• The hypothesis explains social phenomena.

Hypotheses are instrumental in explaining complex social phenomena. For instance, a hypothesis might explore the relationship between economic factors and crime rates in a given community.

• Hypothesis provides a relationship between phenomena for empirical Testing.

Hypotheses establish clear relationships between phenomena, paving the way for empirical testing. An example could be a hypothesis exploring the correlation between sleep patterns and academic performance.

• It helps in knowing the most suitable analysis technique.

A hypothesis guides researchers in selecting the most appropriate analysis techniques for their data. For example, a hypothesis focusing on the effectiveness of a teaching method may lead to the choice of statistical analyses best suited for educational research.

Characteristics of a Good Research Hypothesis

A hypothesis is a specific idea that you can test in a study. It often comes from looking at past research and theories. A good hypothesis usually starts with a research question that you can explore through background research. For it to be effective, consider these key characteristics:

• Clear and Focused Language: A good hypothesis uses clear and focused language to avoid confusion and ensure everyone understands it.
• Related to the Research Topic: The hypothesis should directly relate to the research topic, acting as a bridge between the specific question and the broader study.
• Testable: An effective hypothesis can be tested, meaning its prediction can be checked with real data to support or challenge the proposed relationship.
• Potential for Exploration: A good hypothesis often comes from a research question that invites further exploration. Doing background research helps find gaps and potential areas to investigate.
• Includes Variables: The hypothesis should clearly state both the independent and dependent variables, specifying the factors being studied and the expected outcomes.
• Ethical Considerations: Check if variables can be manipulated without breaking ethical standards. It’s crucial to maintain ethical research practices.
• Predicts Outcomes: The hypothesis should predict the expected relationship and outcome, acting as a roadmap for the study and guiding data collection and analysis.
• Simple and Concise: A good hypothesis avoids unnecessary complexity and is simple and concise, expressing the essence of the proposed relationship clearly.
• Clear and Assumption-Free: The hypothesis should be clear and free from assumptions about the reader’s prior knowledge, ensuring universal understanding.
• Observable and Testable Results: A strong hypothesis implies research that produces observable and testable results, making sure the study’s outcomes can be effectively measured and analyzed.

When you use these characteristics as a checklist, it can help you create a good research hypothesis. It’ll guide improving and strengthening the hypothesis, identifying any weaknesses, and making necessary changes. Crafting a hypothesis with these features helps you conduct a thorough and insightful research study.

Types of Research Hypotheses

The research hypothesis comes in various types, each serving a specific purpose in guiding the scientific investigation. Knowing the differences will make it easier for you to create your own hypothesis. Here’s an overview of the common types:

01. Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis states that there is no connection between two considered variables or that two groups are unrelated. As discussed earlier, a hypothesis is an unproven assumption lacking sufficient supporting data. It serves as the statement researchers aim to disprove. It is testable, verifiable, and can be rejected.

For example, if you’re studying the relationship between Project A and Project B, assuming both projects are of equal standard is your null hypothesis. It needs to be specific for your study.

02. Alternative Hypothesis

The alternative hypothesis is basically another option to the null hypothesis. It involves looking for a significant change or alternative that could lead you to reject the null hypothesis. It’s a different idea compared to the null hypothesis.

When you create a null hypothesis, you’re making an educated guess about whether something is true or if there’s a connection between that thing and another variable. If the null view suggests something is correct, the alternative hypothesis says it’s incorrect. 

For instance, if your null hypothesis is “I’m going to be $1000 richer,” the alternative hypothesis would be “I’m not going to get $1000 or be richer.”

03. Directional Hypothesis

The directional hypothesis predicts the direction of the relationship between independent and dependent variables. They specify whether the effect will be positive or negative.

If you increase your study hours, you will experience a positive association with your exam scores. This hypothesis suggests that as you increase the independent variable (study hours), there will also be an increase in the dependent variable (exam scores).

04. Non-directional Hypothesis

The non-directional hypothesis predicts the existence of a relationship between variables but does not specify the direction of the effect. It suggests that there will be a significant difference or relationship, but it does not predict the nature of that difference.

For example, you will find no notable difference in test scores between students who receive the educational intervention and those who do not. However, once you compare the test scores of the two groups, you will notice an important difference.

05. Simple Hypothesis

A simple hypothesis predicts a relationship between one dependent variable and one independent variable without specifying the nature of that relationship. It’s simple and usually used when we don’t know much about how the two things are connected.

For example, if you adopt effective study habits, you will achieve higher exam scores than those with poor study habits.

06. Complex Hypothesis

A complex hypothesis is an idea that specifies a relationship between multiple independent and dependent variables. It is a more detailed idea than a simple hypothesis.

While a simple view suggests a straightforward cause-and-effect relationship between two things, a complex hypothesis involves many factors and how they’re connected to each other.

For example, when you increase your study time, you tend to achieve higher exam scores. The connection between your study time and exam performance is affected by various factors, including the quality of your sleep, your motivation levels, and the effectiveness of your study techniques.

If you sleep well, stay highly motivated, and use effective study strategies, you may observe a more robust positive correlation between the time you spend studying and your exam scores, unlike those who may lack these factors.

07. Associative Hypothesis

An associative hypothesis proposes a connection between two things without saying that one causes the other. Basically, it suggests that when one thing changes, the other changes too, but it doesn’t claim that one thing is causing the change in the other.

For example, you will likely notice higher exam scores when you increase your study time. You can recognize an association between your study time and exam scores in this scenario.

Your hypothesis acknowledges a relationship between the two variables—your study time and exam scores—without asserting that increased study time directly causes higher exam scores. You need to consider that other factors, like motivation or learning style, could affect the observed association.

08. Causal Hypothesis

A causal hypothesis proposes a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables. It suggests that changes in one variable directly cause changes in another variable.

For example, when you increase your study time, you experience higher exam scores. This hypothesis suggests a direct cause-and-effect relationship, indicating that the more time you spend studying, the higher your exam scores. It assumes that changes in your study time directly influence changes in your exam performance.

09. Empirical Hypothesis

An empirical hypothesis is a statement based on things we can see and measure. It comes from direct observation or experiments and can be tested with real-world evidence. If an experiment proves a theory, it supports the idea and shows it’s not just a guess. This makes the statement more reliable than a wild guess.

For example, if you increase the dosage of a certain medication, you might observe a quicker recovery time for patients. Imagine you’re in charge of a clinical trial. In this trial, patients are given varying dosages of the medication, and you measure and compare their recovery times. This allows you to directly see the effects of different dosages on how fast patients recover.

This way, you can create a research hypothesis: “Increasing the dosage of a certain medication will lead to a faster recovery time for patients.”

10. Statistical Hypothesis

A statistical hypothesis is a statement or assumption about a population parameter that is the subject of an investigation. It serves as the basis for statistical analysis and testing. It is often tested using statistical methods to draw inferences about the larger population.

In a hypothesis test, statistical evidence is collected to either reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis or fail to reject the null hypothesis due to insufficient evidence.

For example, let’s say you’re testing a new medicine. Your hypothesis could be that the medicine doesn’t really help patients get better. So, you collect data and use statistics to see if your guess is right or if the medicine actually makes a difference.

If the data strongly shows that the medicine does help, you say your guess was wrong, and the medicine does make a difference. But if the proof isn’t strong enough, you can stick with your original guess because you didn’t get enough evidence to change your mind.

How to Develop a Research Hypotheses?

Step 1: identify your research problem or topic..

Define the area of interest or the problem you want to investigate. Make sure it’s clear and well-defined.

Start by asking a question about your chosen topic. Consider the limitations of your research and create a straightforward problem related to your topic. Once you’ve done that, you can develop and test a hypothesis with evidence.

Step 2: Conduct a literature review

Review existing literature related to your research problem. This will help you understand the current state of knowledge in the field, identify gaps, and build a foundation for your hypothesis. Consider the following questions:

• What existing research has been conducted on your chosen topic?
• Are there any gaps or unanswered questions in the current literature?
• How will the existing literature contribute to the foundation of your research?

Step 3: Formulate your research question

Based on your literature review, create a specific and concise research question that addresses your identified problem. Your research question should be clear, focused, and relevant to your field of study.

Step 4: Identify variables

Determine the key variables involved in your research question. Variables are the factors or phenomena that you will study and manipulate to test your hypothesis.

• Independent Variable: The variable you manipulate or control.
• Dependent Variable: The variable you measure to observe the effect of the independent variable.

Step 5: State the Null hypothesis

The null hypothesis is a statement that there is no significant difference or effect. It serves as a baseline for comparison with the alternative hypothesis.

Step 6: Select appropriate methods for testing the hypothesis

Choose research methods that align with your study objectives, such as experiments, surveys, or observational studies. The selected methods enable you to test your research hypothesis effectively.

Creating a research hypothesis usually takes more than one try. Expect to make changes as you collect data. It’s normal to test and say no to a few hypotheses before you find the right answer to your research question.

Testing and Evaluating Hypotheses

Testing hypotheses is a really important part of research. It’s like the practical side of things. Here, real-world evidence will help you determine how different things are connected. Let’s explore the main steps in hypothesis testing:

• State your research hypothesis.

Before testing, clearly articulate your research hypothesis. This involves framing both a null hypothesis, suggesting no significant effect or relationship, and an alternative hypothesis, proposing the expected outcome.

• Collect data strategically.

Plan how you will gather information in a way that fits your study. Make sure your data collection method matches the things you’re studying.

Whether through surveys, observations, or experiments, this step demands precision and adherence to the established methodology. The quality of data collected directly influences the credibility of study outcomes.

• Perform an appropriate statistical test.

Choose a statistical test that aligns with the nature of your data and the hypotheses being tested. Whether it’s a t-test, chi-square test, ANOVA, or regression analysis, selecting the right statistical tool is paramount for accurate and reliable results.

• Decide if your idea was right or wrong.

Following the statistical analysis, evaluate the results in the context of your null hypothesis. You need to decide if you should reject your null hypothesis or not.

• Share what you found.

When discussing what you found in your research, be clear and organized. Say whether your idea was supported or not, and talk about what your results mean. Also, mention any limits to your study and suggest ideas for future research.

The Role of QuestionPro to Develop a Good Research Hypothesis

QuestionPro is a survey and research platform that provides tools for creating, distributing, and analyzing surveys. It plays a crucial role in the research process, especially when you’re in the initial stages of hypothesis development. Here’s how QuestionPro can help you to develop a good research hypothesis:

• Survey design and data collection: You can use the platform to create targeted questions that help you gather relevant data.
• Exploratory research: Through surveys and feedback mechanisms on QuestionPro, you can conduct exploratory research to understand the landscape of a particular subject.
• Literature review and background research: QuestionPro surveys can collect sample population opinions, experiences, and preferences. This data and a thorough literature evaluation can help you generate a well-grounded hypothesis by improving your research knowledge.
• Identifying variables: Using targeted survey questions, you can identify relevant variables related to their research topic.
• Testing assumptions: You can use surveys to informally test certain assumptions or hypotheses before formalizing a research hypothesis.
• Data analysis tools: QuestionPro provides tools for analyzing survey data. You can use these tools to identify the collected data’s patterns, correlations, or trends.
• Refining your hypotheses: As you collect data through QuestionPro, you can adjust your hypotheses based on the real-world responses you receive.

A research hypothesis is like a guide for researchers in science. It’s a well-thought-out idea that has been thoroughly tested. This idea is crucial as researchers can explore different fields, such as medicine, social sciences, and natural sciences. The research hypothesis links theories to real-world evidence and gives researchers a clear path to explore and make discoveries.

QuestionPro Research Suite is a helpful tool for researchers. It makes creating surveys, collecting data, and analyzing information easily. It supports all kinds of research, from exploring new ideas to forming hypotheses. With a focus on using data, it helps researchers do their best work.

Are you interested in learning more about QuestionPro Research Suite? Take advantage of QuestionPro’s free trial to get an initial look at its capabilities and realize the full potential of your research efforts.

LEARN MORE         FREE TRIAL

MORE LIKE THIS

Qualtrics vs Google Forms: Which is the Best Platform?

Jul 24, 2024

TypeForm vs. SurveyMonkey: Which is Better in 2024?

SurveyMonkey vs Google Forms: A Detailed Comparison

Jul 23, 2024

Jotform vs Typeform: Which is the Best Option? Comparison (2024)

Other categories.

• Academic Research
• Artificial Intelligence
• Assessments
• Brand Awareness
• Case Studies
• Communities
• Consumer Insights
• Customer effort score
• Customer Engagement
• Customer Experience
• Customer Loyalty
• Customer Research
• Customer Satisfaction
• Employee Benefits
• Employee Engagement
• Employee Retention
• Friday Five
• General Data Protection Regulation
• Insights Hub
• Life@QuestionPro
• Market Research
• Mobile diaries
• Mobile Surveys
• New Features
• Online Communities
• Question Types
• Questionnaire
• QuestionPro Products
• Release Notes
• Research Tools and Apps
• Revenue at Risk
• Survey Templates
• Training Tips
• Tuesday CX Thoughts (TCXT)
• Uncategorized
• What’s Coming Up
• Workforce Intelligence

Difference Between a Hypothesis and an Assumption

The difference between a hypothesis and an assumption is that the first is typically explicit and the second implicit. A hypothesis is what you are testing explicitly in an experiment. An assumption is tested implicitly. By making your assumptions and hypotheses explicit, you increase the clarity of your approach and the chance for learning.

A: When you are looking for early customers, the value hypothesis is critical. You may reach them using non-scalable methods that don’t address your first real growth hypothesis.

Here is my take on the distinction between a hypothesis and an assumption; your mileage may vary:

A hypothesis is what you are testing explicitly in an experiment. An assumption is tested implicitly. By making your assumptions and hypotheses explicit, you increase the clarity of your approach and the chance for learning.

The two things that can trip you up most often are an unconscious assumption that masks a problem with your hypothesis or an unconscious bias in who you are testing the value hypothesis on. In particular, you may have defined your target customer with specific selection criteria, but your actual choices for whom to speak to (or who will talk with you) are not sampling from the full spectrum of possibilities.

“Creative leaps are discontinuities , qualitative changes. They involve three steps: identification of self-imposed constraints (assumptions); removing them; exploring the consequences of their removal. That is why there is always an element of surprise when we are exposed to creative work–it always embodies the denial of something we have taken for granted, usually unconsciously.” Russell Ackoff in “The Democratic Corporation” (page 99)

Update: Test Your Value Hypothesis First Even If Your Methods Don’t Scale

Update Wed-Jan-29-2014 : Tim Allan left a great comment that elaborated on the need to focus on value first even if your methods don’t scale:

There was a bit of a light-bulb moment for me what I read the line: “When you are looking for early customers the value hypothesis is critical. You may reach them using non-scalable methods that don’t address your first real growth hypothesis.”

I feel this is so often forgotten, especially in the situation of legacy systems and trying to execute lean product design within larger organizations. One example that I have been involved in, and which I regret not pushing back harder, was a requirement to use some legacy data services.

This meant that we couldn’t initially execute a hand-cranked, non-scalable solution to data storage and retrieval that our product required, which would have been better as it would have enabled us to get to customer quicker and get real learnings about how they are using our product.

At the time it didn’t seem like a big deal, but in the end it was, and continues to be an issue and an impediment in getting to the customer quicker. Likewise, any real growth hypothesis, results will most likely be skewed by the performance of systems that are not in your control.

I want to thank Tim for offering a practical story that elaborates on the principle of “confirm the value before worrying about scaling.” When I was at Cisco, the focus was always on “will it scale,” as in we shouldn’t do something because “it won’t scale.” This sometimes led to us releasing a product that could have been more valuable if we had proceeded a little more thoughtfully and incorporated early feedback before rushing to launch. Techniques that work “in the small” to gather insight have their place even inside large firms.

Related Blog Posts

• Hypothesis Not Hype
• Early Markets Offer Fluid Opportunities
• Spend Some Time On How To Disprove Your Hypotheses
• Janet Iwasa: Animate Your Hypothesis to Explore Its Viability and Implications
• Without A Revenue Hypothesis Your Business Model Is a List of User Activities
• Strategy is a Hypothesis
• Tristan Kromer on Testing Customer and Value Hypotheses

Image Credit: Public Domain image of a “Rubin Vase”

7 thoughts on “Difference Between a Hypothesis and an Assumption”

How refreshing to find your insights! Behind every strategy or project design is a set of hypotheses, usually not made explicit. We can use if-then causal thinking to link objectives together in relationship to each other with if-then logic “if we build it, they will come”.

My life work has been using the Logical Framework Approach, a systems thinking and project design methodology based on hypotheses and assumptions. Featured in book “Strategic Project Management Made Simple”, and video http://youtu.be/IX09_y4O1aI

Thanks Sean for bringing strategic management principles to your readers — what you shared is fundamental to success but seldom explored.

There was a bit of a light-bulb moment for me what I read the line:

“When you are looking for early customers the value hypothesis is critical. You may reach them using non-scalable methods that don’t address your first real growth hypothesis.”

I feel this is so often forgotten, especially in the situation of legacy systems and trying to execute lean product design within larger organisations. One example that I have been involved in, and which I regret not pushing back harder, was a requirement to use some legacy data services.

This meant that we couldn’t initially execute a hand-cranked, non-scalable solution to data storage and retrieval that our product required, which would have been better as it would have enabled us to get to customer quicker and get real learnings about how they are using our product.

At the time it didn’t seem like a big deal, but in the end it was, and continues to be an issue and an impediment in getting to the customer quicker. Likewise, any real growth hypothesis, results will most likely be skewed by the performance of systems that are not in your control.

Pingback: SKMurphy, Inc. » Quotes for Entrepreneurs–January 2014

Pingback: SKMurphy, Inc. Quotes for Entrepreneurs-November 2014 - SKMurphy, Inc.

Pingback: SKMurphy, Inc. Customer Development After The First Prototype

Pingback: SKMurphy, Inc. Strategy is a Hypothesis - SKMurphy, Inc.

Pingback: SKMurphy, Inc. Most Popular SKMurphy Blog Posts Oct-2006 Through Sep-2017 - SKMurphy, Inc.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Research Process
• Manuscript Preparation
• Manuscript Review
• Publication Process
• Publication Recognition
• Language Editing Services
• Translation Services

What is and How to Write a Good Hypothesis in Research?

• 4 minute read
• 341.9K views

Table of Contents

One of the most important aspects of conducting research is constructing a strong hypothesis. But what makes a hypothesis in research effective? In this article, we’ll look at the difference between a hypothesis and a research question, as well as the elements of a good hypothesis in research. We’ll also include some examples of effective hypotheses, and what pitfalls to avoid.

What is a Hypothesis in Research?

Simply put, a hypothesis is a research question that also includes the predicted or expected result of the research. Without a hypothesis, there can be no basis for a scientific or research experiment. As such, it is critical that you carefully construct your hypothesis by being deliberate and thorough, even before you set pen to paper. Unless your hypothesis is clearly and carefully constructed, any flaw can have an adverse, and even grave, effect on the quality of your experiment and its subsequent results.

Research Question vs Hypothesis

It’s easy to confuse research questions with hypotheses, and vice versa. While they’re both critical to the Scientific Method, they have very specific differences. Primarily, a research question, just like a hypothesis, is focused and concise. But a hypothesis includes a prediction based on the proposed research, and is designed to forecast the relationship of and between two (or more) variables. Research questions are open-ended, and invite debate and discussion, while hypotheses are closed, e.g. “The relationship between A and B will be C.”

A hypothesis is generally used if your research topic is fairly well established, and you are relatively certain about the relationship between the variables that will be presented in your research. Since a hypothesis is ideally suited for experimental studies, it will, by its very existence, affect the design of your experiment. The research question is typically used for new topics that have not yet been researched extensively. Here, the relationship between different variables is less known. There is no prediction made, but there may be variables explored. The research question can be casual in nature, simply trying to understand if a relationship even exists, descriptive or comparative.

How to Write Hypothesis in Research

Writing an effective hypothesis starts before you even begin to type. Like any task, preparation is key, so you start first by conducting research yourself, and reading all you can about the topic that you plan to research. From there, you’ll gain the knowledge you need to understand where your focus within the topic will lie.

Remember that a hypothesis is a prediction of the relationship that exists between two or more variables. Your job is to write a hypothesis, and design the research, to “prove” whether or not your prediction is correct. A common pitfall is to use judgments that are subjective and inappropriate for the construction of a hypothesis. It’s important to keep the focus and language of your hypothesis objective.

An effective hypothesis in research is clearly and concisely written, and any terms or definitions clarified and defined. Specific language must also be used to avoid any generalities or assumptions.

Use the following points as a checklist to evaluate the effectiveness of your research hypothesis:

• Predicts the relationship and outcome
• Simple and concise – avoid wordiness
• Clear with no ambiguity or assumptions about the readers’ knowledge
• Observable and testable results
• Relevant and specific to the research question or problem

Research Hypothesis Example

Perhaps the best way to evaluate whether or not your hypothesis is effective is to compare it to those of your colleagues in the field. There is no need to reinvent the wheel when it comes to writing a powerful research hypothesis. As you’re reading and preparing your hypothesis, you’ll also read other hypotheses. These can help guide you on what works, and what doesn’t, when it comes to writing a strong research hypothesis.

Here are a few generic examples to get you started.

Eating an apple each day, after the age of 60, will result in a reduction of frequency of physician visits.

Budget airlines are more likely to receive more customer complaints. A budget airline is defined as an airline that offers lower fares and fewer amenities than a traditional full-service airline. (Note that the term “budget airline” is included in the hypothesis.

Workplaces that offer flexible working hours report higher levels of employee job satisfaction than workplaces with fixed hours.

Each of the above examples are specific, observable and measurable, and the statement of prediction can be verified or shown to be false by utilizing standard experimental practices. It should be noted, however, that often your hypothesis will change as your research progresses.

Language Editing Plus

Elsevier’s Language Editing Plus service can help ensure that your research hypothesis is well-designed, and articulates your research and conclusions. Our most comprehensive editing package, you can count on a thorough language review by native-English speakers who are PhDs or PhD candidates. We’ll check for effective logic and flow of your manuscript, as well as document formatting for your chosen journal, reference checks, and much more.

Systematic Literature Review or Literature Review?

How to Write an Effective Problem Statement for Your Research Paper

You may also like.

Submission 101: What format should be used for academic papers?

Page-Turner Articles are More Than Just Good Arguments: Be Mindful of Tone and Structure!

A Must-see for Researchers! How to Ensure Inclusivity in Your Scientific Writing

Make Hook, Line, and Sinker: The Art of Crafting Engaging Introductions

Can Describing Study Limitations Improve the Quality of Your Paper?

A Guide to Crafting Shorter, Impactful Sentences in Academic Writing

6 Steps to Write an Excellent Discussion in Your Manuscript

How to Write Clear and Crisp Civil Engineering Papers? Here are 5 Key Tips to Consider

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

Hypothesis vs. Assumption — What's the Difference?

Difference Between Hypothesis and Assumption

Table of contents, key differences, comparison chart, testability, outcome if incorrect, evolution based on evidence, compare with definitions, common curiosities, how does an incorrect assumption impact research, is a hypothesis always correct, how do you validate a hypothesis, what's the primary purpose of a hypothesis in research, can assumptions be tested, do all scientific studies begin with a hypothesis, are assumptions always untested, is a hypothesis more valuable than an assumption in research, are assumptions universally accepted, do assumptions have a place in scientific research, can a hypothesis turn into an assumption over time, how does one form a hypothesis, can a hypothesis be broad, what happens if you start with the wrong assumption, why is it crucial to identify assumptions in research, share your discovery.

Author Spotlight

Popular Comparisons

Trending Comparisons

New Comparisons

Trending Terms

• [email protected]

Assumptions in Research: Foundation, 5 Types, and Impact

An assumption is a belief, thing, or statement that is taken as true by the researcher. It is not tested in research because these statements are the cornerstone of whole research. These are universally accepted and sufficiently well demonstrated that the researcher can build on them.

They are a fundamental part of the human experience. People make them in their everyday decisions and experiences. If we do not consider these assumptions, our research will not proceed any further.

Our inferences or conclusions are often based on them, and sometimes we do not think about it critically. Nevertheless, a critical thinker pays close attention to these assumptions, recognizing that they can be flawed or misinformed. Merely presuming something’s validity doesn’t guarantee its accuracy. Just because we assume something is true doesn’t mean it is.

In research, we must think carefully about them when finding and analyzing information, but we also must think carefully about the assumptions of others. When looking at a website or a scholarly article, we should always consider the author’s assumptions, whether the author has taken them logically.

However, when one person believes one thing to be true, it may be somewhat different from what another person believes to be true. Although the well-established assumptions are firmly rooted in prior research, most of us tend to accept those assumptions that square with our own personal or professional views of the world without questioning the extent to which they have been or are capable of being verified. In addition, assumptions are not always easy to state. Seasoned researchers may not consider it seemly to admit that fact, but beginning researchers are quick to acknowledge the difficulty and to ask where the dividing line falls between assumptions and hypotheses. For example, the statement that memory loss occurs with aging may be accepted as an assumption by some but as a hypothesis for investigation by others.

Assumptions are things that are accepted as true; any scholar reading our paper will assume that certain aspects of our study are true, like population, statistical test, research design, or other delimitations. For example, if I tell my friend that the jungle is my favorite place, he will assume that I have never encountered a lion in the jungle. It’s assumed that I go there for walks and recreation. Because most assumptions are not discussed in text, assumptions that are discussed in text are discussed in the context of the limitations of our study, which is typically in the discussion section.

This is important, because both assumptions and limitations affect the inferences we can draw from your study. One prevalent assumption often made in survey research involves expecting honesty and truthful answers. However, for certain sensitive questions this assumption may be more difficult to accept, in this case it would be described as a limitation of the study.

For example, asking people to report their criminal or sexual behavior in a survey may not be as reliable as asking people to report their eating habits. It is important to remember that our limitations and assumptions should not contradict one another. For instance, if we state that generalizability is a limitation of our study given that our sample was limited to one city in Pakistan, then we should not claim generalizability to Pakistan population as an assumption of our study.

In quantitative research designs, statistical models come with accompanying assumptions, which can vary in their stringency. These assumptions typically pertain to data characteristics, including distributions, correlations, and variable types. Violating these assumptions can lead to drastically invalid results, though this often depends on sample size and other considerations.

Table of Contents

Types of assumptions, 1. universal .

These assumptions are believed to be universally accepted and considered as true by large part of society. To test these assumptions is a very difficult task.

For example: There is a super natural force which holds this whole universe.

2.  Based On Theories

If a researcher is working on a theory, the assumptions used in that theory will also be the assumptions of this study.

For example: Research on atomic theory will take the assumptions of development of atomic theory.

3. Common Sense Assumptions

Some of the common sense assumptions are taken to conduct a research.

For example: Heart attack is more common in urban areas as compared to rural areas.

4. Warranted 

This assumption is supported by certain evidence.

For example: Regular walk can reduce obesity.

5. Unwarranted 

This assumption is not supported by evidences.

For example: God exists everywhere in this universe.

Examples in Research

• Sample is a true representative of population.
• It is a true experimental design.
• In comparison of two teaching methods, the behavior of students will be ideal and results are generalizable.
• We will receive true responses from respondents.
• During the experiment in laboratory, no hidden factors will affect the results of experiment.
• The equipment is functioning well and there is no error in equipment.

IDENTIFYING ASSUMPTION

When we make incorrect or unreasonable assumption during research, we will get false conclusions. So we should think that what assumption should be a part of thesis and what should not be. A good assumption is that which can be verified or justified. A bad one on the other hand cannot be verified or justified. The researcher must explain and give examples that the assumption made is true. For example, if the researcher is making an assumption that respondents will give honest responses to your questions, he or she must explain the data collection process and how will preserve anonymity and confidentiality to maximize the truthfulness.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HYPOTHESIS AND ASSUMPTION

A hypothesis is an intelligent guess which establishes relationship between variables. On the other hand, assumption is statement or belief which is taken as true without any justification. Hypothesis is tested explicitly, and assumption is tested implicitly. Hypothesis passes through the stages of verification. Assumption specifies the existence of relationship between variables while hypothesis establishes this relationship.

Hypotheses and assumption are so close to each other that sometime they create confusion. Assumption is assumed true statement without having any firm explanation behind it. Hypothesis is an assumption which is taken to be true unless proved otherwise.

Discover more from Theresearches

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Continue reading

Stating the Obvious: Writing Assumptions, Limitations, and Delimitations

During the process of writing your thesis or dissertation, you might suddenly realize that your research has inherent flaws. Don’t worry! Virtually all projects contain restrictions to your research. However, being able to recognize and accurately describe these problems is the difference between a true researcher and a grade-school kid with a science-fair project. Concerns with truthful responding, access to participants, and survey instruments are just a few of examples of restrictions on your research. In the following sections, the differences among delimitations, limitations, and assumptions of a dissertation will be clarified.

Delimitations

Delimitations are the definitions you set as the boundaries of your own thesis or dissertation, so delimitations are in your control. Delimitations are set so that your goals do not become impossibly large to complete. Examples of delimitations include objectives, research questions, variables, theoretical objectives that you have adopted, and populations chosen as targets to study. When you are stating your delimitations, clearly inform readers why you chose this course of study. The answer might simply be that you were curious about the topic and/or wanted to improve standards of a professional field by revealing certain findings. In any case, you should clearly list the other options available and the reasons why you did not choose these options immediately after you list your delimitations. You might have avoided these options for reasons of practicality, interest, or relativity to the study at hand. For example, you might have only studied Hispanic mothers because they have the highest rate of obese babies. Delimitations are often strongly related to your theory and research questions. If you were researching whether there are different parenting styles between unmarried Asian, Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic women, then a delimitation of your study would be the inclusion of only participants with those demographics and the exclusion of participants from other demographics such as men, married women, and all other ethnicities of single women (inclusion and exclusion criteria). A further delimitation might be that you only included closed-ended Likert scale responses in the survey, rather than including additional open-ended responses, which might make some people more willing to take and complete your survey. Remember that delimitations are not good or bad. They are simply a detailed description of the scope of interest for your study as it relates to the research design. Don’t forget to describe the philosophical framework you used throughout your study, which also delimits your study.

Limitations

Limitations of a dissertation are potential weaknesses in your study that are mostly out of your control, given limited funding, choice of research design, statistical model constraints, or other factors. In addition, a limitation is a restriction on your study that cannot be reasonably dismissed and can affect your design and results. Do not worry about limitations because limitations affect virtually all research projects, as well as most things in life. Even when you are going to your favorite restaurant, you are limited by the menu choices. If you went to a restaurant that had a menu that you were craving, you might not receive the service, price, or location that makes you enjoy your favorite restaurant. If you studied participants’ responses to a survey, you might be limited in your abilities to gain the exact type or geographic scope of participants you wanted. The people whom you managed to get to take your survey may not truly be a random sample, which is also a limitation. If you used a common test for data findings, your results are limited by the reliability of the test. If your study was limited to a certain amount of time, your results are affected by the operations of society during that time period (e.g., economy, social trends). It is important for you to remember that limitations of a dissertation are often not something that can be solved by the researcher. Also, remember that whatever limits you also limits other researchers, whether they are the largest medical research companies or consumer habits corporations. Certain kinds of limitations are often associated with the analytical approach you take in your research, too. For example, some qualitative methods like heuristics or phenomenology do not lend themselves well to replicability. Also, most of the commonly used quantitative statistical models can only determine correlation, but not causation.

Assumptions

Assumptions are things that are accepted as true, or at least plausible, by researchers and peers who will read your dissertation or thesis. In other words, any scholar reading your paper will assume that certain aspects of your study is true given your population, statistical test, research design, or other delimitations. For example, if you tell your friend that your favorite restaurant is an Italian place, your friend will assume that you don’t go there for the sushi. It’s assumed that you go there to eat Italian food. Because most assumptions are not discussed in-text, assumptions that are discussed in-text are discussed in the context of the limitations of your study, which is typically in the discussion section. This is important, because both assumptions and limitations affect the inferences you can draw from your study. One of the more common assumptions made in survey research is the assumption of honesty and truthful responses. However, for certain sensitive questions this assumption may be more difficult to accept, in which case it would be described as a limitation of the study. For example, asking people to report their criminal behavior in a survey may not be as reliable as asking people to report their eating habits. It is important to remember that your limitations and assumptions should not contradict one another. For instance, if you state that generalizability is a limitation of your study given that your sample was limited to one city in the United States, then you should not claim generalizability to the United States population as an assumption of your study. Statistical models in quantitative research designs are accompanied with assumptions as well, some more strict than others. These assumptions generally refer to the characteristics of the data, such as distributions, correlational trends, and variable type, just to name a few. Violating these assumptions can lead to drastically invalid results, though this often depends on sample size and other considerations.

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2024 PhDStudent.com. All rights reserved. Designed by Divergent Web Solutions, LLC .

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• v.53(4); 2010 Aug

Research questions, hypotheses and objectives

Patricia farrugia.

* Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, the

Bradley A. Petrisor

† Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and the

Forough Farrokhyar

‡ Departments of Surgery and

§ Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont

Mohit Bhandari

There is an increasing familiarity with the principles of evidence-based medicine in the surgical community. As surgeons become more aware of the hierarchy of evidence, grades of recommendations and the principles of critical appraisal, they develop an increasing familiarity with research design. Surgeons and clinicians are looking more and more to the literature and clinical trials to guide their practice; as such, it is becoming a responsibility of the clinical research community to attempt to answer questions that are not only well thought out but also clinically relevant. The development of the research question, including a supportive hypothesis and objectives, is a necessary key step in producing clinically relevant results to be used in evidence-based practice. A well-defined and specific research question is more likely to help guide us in making decisions about study design and population and subsequently what data will be collected and analyzed. 1

Objectives of this article

In this article, we discuss important considerations in the development of a research question and hypothesis and in defining objectives for research. By the end of this article, the reader will be able to appreciate the significance of constructing a good research question and developing hypotheses and research objectives for the successful design of a research study. The following article is divided into 3 sections: research question, research hypothesis and research objectives.

Research question

Interest in a particular topic usually begins the research process, but it is the familiarity with the subject that helps define an appropriate research question for a study. 1 Questions then arise out of a perceived knowledge deficit within a subject area or field of study. 2 Indeed, Haynes suggests that it is important to know “where the boundary between current knowledge and ignorance lies.” 1 The challenge in developing an appropriate research question is in determining which clinical uncertainties could or should be studied and also rationalizing the need for their investigation.

Increasing one’s knowledge about the subject of interest can be accomplished in many ways. Appropriate methods include systematically searching the literature, in-depth interviews and focus groups with patients (and proxies) and interviews with experts in the field. In addition, awareness of current trends and technological advances can assist with the development of research questions. 2 It is imperative to understand what has been studied about a topic to date in order to further the knowledge that has been previously gathered on a topic. Indeed, some granting institutions (e.g., Canadian Institute for Health Research) encourage applicants to conduct a systematic review of the available evidence if a recent review does not already exist and preferably a pilot or feasibility study before applying for a grant for a full trial.

In-depth knowledge about a subject may generate a number of questions. It then becomes necessary to ask whether these questions can be answered through one study or if more than one study needed. 1 Additional research questions can be developed, but several basic principles should be taken into consideration. 1 All questions, primary and secondary, should be developed at the beginning and planning stages of a study. Any additional questions should never compromise the primary question because it is the primary research question that forms the basis of the hypothesis and study objectives. It must be kept in mind that within the scope of one study, the presence of a number of research questions will affect and potentially increase the complexity of both the study design and subsequent statistical analyses, not to mention the actual feasibility of answering every question. 1 A sensible strategy is to establish a single primary research question around which to focus the study plan. 3 In a study, the primary research question should be clearly stated at the end of the introduction of the grant proposal, and it usually specifies the population to be studied, the intervention to be implemented and other circumstantial factors. 4

Hulley and colleagues 2 have suggested the use of the FINER criteria in the development of a good research question ( Box 1 ). The FINER criteria highlight useful points that may increase the chances of developing a successful research project. A good research question should specify the population of interest, be of interest to the scientific community and potentially to the public, have clinical relevance and further current knowledge in the field (and of course be compliant with the standards of ethical boards and national research standards).

FINER criteria for a good research question

Adapted with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health. 2

Whereas the FINER criteria outline the important aspects of the question in general, a useful format to use in the development of a specific research question is the PICO format — consider the population (P) of interest, the intervention (I) being studied, the comparison (C) group (or to what is the intervention being compared) and the outcome of interest (O). 3 , 5 , 6 Often timing (T) is added to PICO ( Box 2 ) — that is, “Over what time frame will the study take place?” 1 The PICOT approach helps generate a question that aids in constructing the framework of the study and subsequently in protocol development by alluding to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and identifying the groups of patients to be included. Knowing the specific population of interest, intervention (and comparator) and outcome of interest may also help the researcher identify an appropriate outcome measurement tool. 7 The more defined the population of interest, and thus the more stringent the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the greater the effect on the interpretation and subsequent applicability and generalizability of the research findings. 1 , 2 A restricted study population (and exclusion criteria) may limit bias and increase the internal validity of the study; however, this approach will limit external validity of the study and, thus, the generalizability of the findings to the practical clinical setting. Conversely, a broadly defined study population and inclusion criteria may be representative of practical clinical practice but may increase bias and reduce the internal validity of the study.

PICOT criteria 1

A poorly devised research question may affect the choice of study design, potentially lead to futile situations and, thus, hamper the chance of determining anything of clinical significance, which will then affect the potential for publication. Without devoting appropriate resources to developing the research question, the quality of the study and subsequent results may be compromised. During the initial stages of any research study, it is therefore imperative to formulate a research question that is both clinically relevant and answerable.

Research hypothesis

The primary research question should be driven by the hypothesis rather than the data. 1 , 2 That is, the research question and hypothesis should be developed before the start of the study. This sounds intuitive; however, if we take, for example, a database of information, it is potentially possible to perform multiple statistical comparisons of groups within the database to find a statistically significant association. This could then lead one to work backward from the data and develop the “question.” This is counterintuitive to the process because the question is asked specifically to then find the answer, thus collecting data along the way (i.e., in a prospective manner). Multiple statistical testing of associations from data previously collected could potentially lead to spuriously positive findings of association through chance alone. 2 Therefore, a good hypothesis must be based on a good research question at the start of a trial and, indeed, drive data collection for the study.

The research or clinical hypothesis is developed from the research question and then the main elements of the study — sampling strategy, intervention (if applicable), comparison and outcome variables — are summarized in a form that establishes the basis for testing, statistical and ultimately clinical significance. 3 For example, in a research study comparing computer-assisted acetabular component insertion versus freehand acetabular component placement in patients in need of total hip arthroplasty, the experimental group would be computer-assisted insertion and the control/conventional group would be free-hand placement. The investigative team would first state a research hypothesis. This could be expressed as a single outcome (e.g., computer-assisted acetabular component placement leads to improved functional outcome) or potentially as a complex/composite outcome; that is, more than one outcome (e.g., computer-assisted acetabular component placement leads to both improved radiographic cup placement and improved functional outcome).

However, when formally testing statistical significance, the hypothesis should be stated as a “null” hypothesis. 2 The purpose of hypothesis testing is to make an inference about the population of interest on the basis of a random sample taken from that population. The null hypothesis for the preceding research hypothesis then would be that there is no difference in mean functional outcome between the computer-assisted insertion and free-hand placement techniques. After forming the null hypothesis, the researchers would form an alternate hypothesis stating the nature of the difference, if it should appear. The alternate hypothesis would be that there is a difference in mean functional outcome between these techniques. At the end of the study, the null hypothesis is then tested statistically. If the findings of the study are not statistically significant (i.e., there is no difference in functional outcome between the groups in a statistical sense), we cannot reject the null hypothesis, whereas if the findings were significant, we can reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis (i.e., there is a difference in mean functional outcome between the study groups), errors in testing notwithstanding. In other words, hypothesis testing confirms or refutes the statement that the observed findings did not occur by chance alone but rather occurred because there was a true difference in outcomes between these surgical procedures. The concept of statistical hypothesis testing is complex, and the details are beyond the scope of this article.

Another important concept inherent in hypothesis testing is whether the hypotheses will be 1-sided or 2-sided. A 2-sided hypothesis states that there is a difference between the experimental group and the control group, but it does not specify in advance the expected direction of the difference. For example, we asked whether there is there an improvement in outcomes with computer-assisted surgery or whether the outcomes worse with computer-assisted surgery. We presented a 2-sided test in the above example because we did not specify the direction of the difference. A 1-sided hypothesis states a specific direction (e.g., there is an improvement in outcomes with computer-assisted surgery). A 2-sided hypothesis should be used unless there is a good justification for using a 1-sided hypothesis. As Bland and Atlman 8 stated, “One-sided hypothesis testing should never be used as a device to make a conventionally nonsignificant difference significant.”

The research hypothesis should be stated at the beginning of the study to guide the objectives for research. Whereas the investigators may state the hypothesis as being 1-sided (there is an improvement with treatment), the study and investigators must adhere to the concept of clinical equipoise. According to this principle, a clinical (or surgical) trial is ethical only if the expert community is uncertain about the relative therapeutic merits of the experimental and control groups being evaluated. 9 It means there must exist an honest and professional disagreement among expert clinicians about the preferred treatment. 9

Designing a research hypothesis is supported by a good research question and will influence the type of research design for the study. Acting on the principles of appropriate hypothesis development, the study can then confidently proceed to the development of the research objective.

Research objective

The primary objective should be coupled with the hypothesis of the study. Study objectives define the specific aims of the study and should be clearly stated in the introduction of the research protocol. 7 From our previous example and using the investigative hypothesis that there is a difference in functional outcomes between computer-assisted acetabular component placement and free-hand placement, the primary objective can be stated as follows: this study will compare the functional outcomes of computer-assisted acetabular component insertion versus free-hand placement in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Note that the study objective is an active statement about how the study is going to answer the specific research question. Objectives can (and often do) state exactly which outcome measures are going to be used within their statements. They are important because they not only help guide the development of the protocol and design of study but also play a role in sample size calculations and determining the power of the study. 7 These concepts will be discussed in other articles in this series.

From the surgeon’s point of view, it is important for the study objectives to be focused on outcomes that are important to patients and clinically relevant. For example, the most methodologically sound randomized controlled trial comparing 2 techniques of distal radial fixation would have little or no clinical impact if the primary objective was to determine the effect of treatment A as compared to treatment B on intraoperative fluoroscopy time. However, if the objective was to determine the effect of treatment A as compared to treatment B on patient functional outcome at 1 year, this would have a much more significant impact on clinical decision-making. Second, more meaningful surgeon–patient discussions could ensue, incorporating patient values and preferences with the results from this study. 6 , 7 It is the precise objective and what the investigator is trying to measure that is of clinical relevance in the practical setting.

The following is an example from the literature about the relation between the research question, hypothesis and study objectives:

Study: Warden SJ, Metcalf BR, Kiss ZS, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for chronic patellar tendinopathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatology 2008;47:467–71.

Research question: How does low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) compare with a placebo device in managing the symptoms of skeletally mature patients with patellar tendinopathy?

Research hypothesis: Pain levels are reduced in patients who receive daily active-LIPUS (treatment) for 12 weeks compared with individuals who receive inactive-LIPUS (placebo).

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of LIPUS in the management of patellar tendinopathy symptoms.

The development of the research question is the most important aspect of a research project. A research project can fail if the objectives and hypothesis are poorly focused and underdeveloped. Useful tips for surgical researchers are provided in Box 3 . Designing and developing an appropriate and relevant research question, hypothesis and objectives can be a difficult task. The critical appraisal of the research question used in a study is vital to the application of the findings to clinical practice. Focusing resources, time and dedication to these 3 very important tasks will help to guide a successful research project, influence interpretation of the results and affect future publication efforts.

Tips for developing research questions, hypotheses and objectives for research studies

• Perform a systematic literature review (if one has not been done) to increase knowledge and familiarity with the topic and to assist with research development.
• Learn about current trends and technological advances on the topic.
• Seek careful input from experts, mentors, colleagues and collaborators to refine your research question as this will aid in developing the research question and guide the research study.
• Use the FINER criteria in the development of the research question.
• Ensure that the research question follows PICOT format.
• Develop a research hypothesis from the research question.
• Develop clear and well-defined primary and secondary (if needed) objectives.
• Ensure that the research question and objectives are answerable, feasible and clinically relevant.

FINER = feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, relevant; PICOT = population (patients), intervention (for intervention studies only), comparison group, outcome of interest, time.

Competing interests: No funding was received in preparation of this paper. Dr. Bhandari was funded, in part, by a Canada Research Chair, McMaster University.

Science Hypothesis

Ai generator.

Hypothesis are the bedrock of scientific investigation, guiding researchers toward understanding the unknown. Crafting effective science hypotheses involves precise formulation and prediction. This hypothesis statement guide delves into the intricacies of constructing science hypothesis statements, offering practical examples and valuable tips to ensure your hypothesis stand strong against the rigors of experimentation and analysis.

What is Science Hypothesis? – Definition

A science hypothesis is a proposed explanation or educated guess that can be tested through experimentation or observation. It serves as a preliminary assumption or prediction about a phenomenon, often derived from existing knowledge or theories. Science hypotheses are essential for guiding research and helping scientists investigate the validity of their predictions.

What is an example of a hypothesis statement in science?

Example of a hypothesis statement in science: “If the temperature of water increases, then the rate of plant growth will also increase.” This hypothesis predicts a cause-and-effect relationship between water temperature and plant growth, which can be tested through controlled experiments.

100 Science Hypothesis Statement Examples

Size: 223 KB

Science hypotheses lay the foundation for empirical exploration. These Thesis statements predict outcomes based on existing knowledge and guide research. Explore a variety of science hypothesis examples across different disciplines, showcasing the diverse ways scientists propose, test, and validate their assumptions. From physics to biology, chemistry to astronomy, delve into these examples that highlight the essence of scientific inquiry and discovery.

• Physics : If the mass of an object increases, its gravitational pull on another object will also increase.
• Biology : If plants are exposed to different light wavelengths, then the one exposed to red light will exhibit the highest growth rate.
• Chemistry : If the concentration of a reactant increases, then the rate of the chemical reaction will also increase.
• Astronomy : If the distance between two galaxies decreases, then their gravitational attraction will intensify.
• Geology : If the temperature of a rock sample increases, then its density will decrease due to expansion.
• Psychology : If individuals are exposed to positive affirmations, then their self-esteem scores will improve.
• Sociology : If economic inequality increases, then crime rates within a community will also rise.
• Environmental Science : If pollution levels decrease in a river, then the diversity of aquatic species will increase.
• Computer Science : If the processing speed of a computer chip increases, then the execution time of a software program will decrease.
• Meteorology : If atmospheric pressure drops significantly, then the likelihood of stormy weather conditions will rise.
• Neuroscience : If individuals engage in regular meditation, then their brain’s gray matter volume in regions associated with mindfulness will increase.
• Economics : If interest rates decrease, then consumer spending will rise due to increased borrowing.
• Anthropology : If a society’s cultural diversity increases, then its acceptance of differing norms and values will also grow.
• Zoology : If predators are introduced to an ecosystem, then the population of prey species will decline.
• Medical Research : If a new drug is administered, then patients with a specific medical condition will experience a reduction in symptoms.
• Nutrition Science : If individuals consume a diet high in antioxidants, then their risk of developing certain chronic diseases will decrease.
• Materials Science : If the temperature of a metal is lowered, then its electrical conductivity will decrease due to reduced kinetic energy.
• Political Science : If voter education initiatives increase, then voter turnout rates in elections will also rise.
• Geography : If urbanization expands in a region, then the average local temperature will increase due to the heat island effect.
• Ecology : If a keystone species is removed from an ecosystem, then the overall biodiversity of that ecosystem will be negatively impacted.
• Medieval History : If trade routes between two civilizations strengthen, then cultural exchange and technological advancements will flourish.
• Microbiology : If a specific bacterium is introduced to a microbial community, then it will outcompete other species for resources.
• Oceanography : If ocean temperatures rise, then coral reefs will experience bleaching due to the loss of symbiotic algae.
• Education : If class sizes are reduced, then student engagement and learning outcomes will improve.
• Genetics : If individuals inherit two recessive alleles for a particular trait, then they will exhibit the trait phenotypically.
• Criminology : If community policing initiatives are implemented, then the crime rate in neighborhoods will decrease due to improved trust between law enforcement and residents.
• Botany : If plants are exposed to varying levels of nutrients, then their growth rate and overall health will be affected accordingly.
• Epidemiology : If individuals are vaccinated against a specific virus, then the incidence of that virus in the population will decline.
• Architecture : If buildings are designed with energy-efficient features, then their energy consumption and environmental impact will be reduced.
• Literary Studies : If readers are exposed to diverse genres of literature, then their vocabulary and literary comprehension will expand.
• Mechanical Engineering : If the surface area of a heat exchanger is increased, then its efficiency in transferring thermal energy will improve.
• Artificial Intelligence : If a machine learning algorithm is trained on a larger dataset, then its accuracy in making predictions will increase.
• Sports Science : If athletes incorporate specific pre-game rituals, then their performance and focus during competitions will improve.
• Archaeology : If a new excavation site is discovered, then artifacts and evidence of past civilizations will be uncovered.
• Film Studies : If films use non-linear storytelling techniques, then audience engagement and interpretation will become more complex.
• Fashion Design : If clothing materials with better breathability are used, then wearers’ comfort levels in hot weather will increase.
• Music Psychology : If listeners are exposed to music with a fast tempo, then their heart rate and energy levels will be positively affected.
• Environmental Engineering : If a wastewater treatment system is upgraded, then the water quality of nearby rivers and streams will improve.
• Philosophy : If ethical dilemmas are discussed openly, then individuals’ moral reasoning and decision-making skills will become more refined.
• Cognitive Science : If individuals practice mindfulness meditation, then their attention span and cognitive control will enhance.
• Political Economy : If trade barriers between two countries are lifted, then their economic interdependence and cooperation will strengthen.
• Agricultural Science : If certain crops are rotated in a field, then soil fertility and nutrient content will be better maintained.
• Cultural Anthropology : If cultural norms change to value gender equality, then the division of labor and social roles will evolve accordingly.
• Linguistics : If a language’s phonetic structure is altered, then the perception and articulation of speech sounds will be affected.
• Religious Studies : If religious festivals are celebrated widely, then social cohesion and a sense of community among participants will increase.
• Urban Planning : If public transportation infrastructure is improved, then the use of private vehicles and traffic congestion will decrease.
• Renewable Energy : If solar panel efficiency increases, then the cost-effectiveness of solar energy as a power source will improve.
• Sustainable Agriculture : If organic farming practices are adopted, then soil health and biodiversity in agricultural fields will be enhanced.
• Human Genetics : If a specific gene mutation is present, then the likelihood of developing a hereditary disease will be higher.
• Space Exploration : If a spacecraft is sent to a distant planet, then the data collected will provide insights into its composition and environment.
• Cultural Studies : If a society values inclusivity in its media representations, then stereotypes and biases will be challenged.
• Quantum Physics : If two entangled particles are measured, then the measurement of one particle will instantaneously affect the state of the other particle, regardless of distance.
• Social Work : If support systems are established for individuals facing addiction, then their likelihood of successful recovery will increase.
• Civil Engineering : If a bridge is constructed using specific materials and design principles, then its load-bearing capacity and structural integrity will be maximized.
• Educational Technology : If interactive learning platforms are integrated into classrooms, then students’ engagement and retention of concepts will rise.
• Animal Behavior : If a specific stimulus is introduced to an animal’s environment, then its behavioral response will indicate whether the stimulus is perceived as positive or negative.
• Public Health : If a vaccination campaign targets a high percentage of the population, then the spread of a contagious disease will be curbed.
• Forensic Science : If DNA evidence is analyzed from a crime scene, then it can be matched to potential suspects or used to exonerate individuals.
• Game Design : If a game incorporates branching storylines, then players’ choices will lead to multiple possible outcomes and endings.
• Gender Studies : If gender stereotypes are challenged in educational settings, then students’ understanding of gender roles and identities will evolve.
• Particle Physics : If a new particle is discovered in particle accelerator experiments, then it may contribute to our understanding of fundamental forces.
• Culinary Science : If cooking techniques are adjusted, then the texture and flavor of a dish will be enhanced.
• Developmental Psychology : If children are exposed to early childhood education programs, then their cognitive and social development will be positively influenced.
• Journalism : If journalists provide unbiased coverage of events, then the public’s perception and understanding of news stories will be more accurate.
• Business Management : If a company implements remote work policies, then employees’ job satisfaction and productivity will be impacted.
• Astronomy : If a telescope observes a distant celestial object, then its light spectrum can reveal information about its composition and distance.
• Climate Science : If greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, then global temperatures will increase, leading to more frequent and severe climate events.
• Molecular Biology : If a specific gene is mutated, then the protein it codes for may lose its function, leading to a genetic disorder.
• Urban Sociology : If urban planning focuses on mixed-use development, then neighborhoods will become more walkable and vibrant.
• Environmental Science : If deforestation continues in a particular region, then biodiversity loss and habitat destruction will result.
• Educational Psychology : If students receive constructive feedback, then their academic performance and self-esteem will improve.
• Sports Nutrition : If athletes consume a balanced diet, then their energy levels and physical performance will be optimized.
• Industrial Engineering : If a manufacturing process is streamlined, then production efficiency and cost-effectiveness will increase.
• Climate Change Mitigation : If renewable energy sources replace fossil fuels, then carbon emissions and air pollution will decrease.
• Criminal Justice : If restorative justice programs are implemented, then recidivism rates among offenders will decrease.
• Cognitive Neuroscience : If brain imaging techniques are used, then neural activity patterns associated with memory retrieval can be identified.
• Environmental Policy : If conservation policies are enforced, then endangered species populations will have a chance to recover.
• Tourism Management : If sustainable tourism practices are adopted, then the negative impact of tourism on local ecosystems will be minimized.
• Public Opinion Research : If surveys are conducted on political preferences, then insights into voter behavior and attitudes can be gained.
• Sociolinguistics : If language use changes over time, then linguistic patterns and dialects in a community may evolve.
• Consumer Behavior : If marketing strategies incorporate social media influencers, then consumer purchasing decisions will be influenced.
• Digital Communication : If online privacy measures are strengthened, then users’ data security and trust in digital platforms will increase.
• Cancer Research : If a specific genetic mutation is identified, then targeted therapies can be developed to treat the cancer associated with that mutation.
• Human Rights Advocacy : If educational campaigns raise awareness about human rights violations, then public pressure on governments to address these issues will rise.
• Educational Assessment : If standardized tests are redesigned to focus on critical thinking skills, then students’ analytical abilities will be better evaluated.
• Epidemiology : If a specific virus spreads within a community, then the rate of infection and transmission can be studied to develop effective containment strategies.
• Cognitive Psychology : If memory recall is examined under different conditions, then the factors influencing memory retrieval can be identified.
• Financial Economics : If interest rates are lowered by the central bank, then borrowing costs for businesses and individuals will decrease.
• Marine Biology : If ocean temperatures rise due to climate change, then coral bleaching events will become more frequent, leading to coral reef degradation.
• Political Science : If voter turnout is influenced by campaign advertising, then the correlation between media exposure and voting behavior can be analyzed.
• Clinical Psychology : If cognitive-behavioral therapy is administered to individuals with anxiety disorders, then their symptoms will show a reduction.
• Public Policy : If a government enforces stricter regulations on smoking in public spaces, then the prevalence of smoking-related health issues will decline.
• Material Science : If a new material is developed with specific properties, then its potential applications in various industries can be explored.
• Language Acquisition : If children are exposed to multiple languages in their early years, then their linguistic skills may develop differently compared to monolingual children.
• Tourism Economics : If travel restrictions are lifted, then the recovery of the tourism industry and its contribution to the local economy can be assessed.
• Behavioral Economics : If individuals are given incentives to make environmentally friendly choices, then the impact of economic incentives on behavior can be studied.
• Educational Technology : If online learning platforms are used in classrooms, then their effect on student engagement and academic performance can be evaluated.
• Health Policy : If universal healthcare coverage is implemented, then access to medical services and health outcomes for the population can be improved.
• Agricultural Economics : If crop yields are compared between traditional farming methods and modern agricultural practices, then the efficiency of different approaches can be determined.
• Literary Analysis : If a specific theme is analyzed across different literary works, then the ways in which authors address and convey that theme can be explored.

Science Hypothesis Statement Examples for Psychology

These psychology hypothesis pertain to human behaviors, emotions, or cognitive processes. They are tailored to the field of psychology, which studies the human mind and behavior. For instance, “Effects of Sleep on Memory” posits a connection between sleep duration and memory performance.

• Effects of Sleep on Memory : People who sleep 8 hours per night will perform better on memory tests compared to those who sleep only 4 hours.
• Role of Colors in Mood Regulation : Exposure to blue light will decrease feelings of sadness in depressed individuals.
• Childhood Attachment and Adult Relationships : Individuals with secure childhood attachments will have more stable romantic relationships in adulthood.
• Influence of Music on Productivity : Listening to classical music while working increases task completion rates among office workers.
• Gaming and Reaction Time : Regular gamers will have quicker reaction times than non-gamers in response to unexpected stimuli.
• Effects of Meditation on Stress : Individuals who practice daily meditation will report lower stress levels compared to those who don’t meditate.
• Social Media Usage and Loneliness : High usage of social media correlates with increased feelings of loneliness in teenagers.
• Class Size and Student Performance : Students in smaller class sizes will score higher on standardized tests than students in larger class sizes.
• Scent and Memory Recall : People exposed to a specific scent during learning will recall information better when the same scent is present during retrieval.
• Financial Incentives and Motivation : Providing financial incentives will increase motivation for completing mundane tasks.

Simple Science Hypothesis Statement Examples

These are basic and straightforward scientific hypotheses that cover various fields, such as biology or physics. They’re easy to understand even for people without much scientific background. For instance, the simple hypothesis tatement about “Plant Growth” directly relates the use of fertilizer to plant height.

• Plant Growth : Adding fertilizer will make plants grow taller.
• Solar Energy : Increasing sunlight exposure will increase the voltage output of a solar cell.
• Density : Objects made of metal will sink in water.
• Digestion : Enzyme supplements will increase the speed of food digestion.
• Osmosis : Potatoes placed in salt water will shrink due to loss of water.
• Evaporation : Water will evaporate faster on a hot day compared to a cold day.
• Nutrition : Plants given sugar water will develop yellow leaves.
• Magnetism : Increasing the temperature of a magnet will decrease its magnetic strength.
• Conduction : Metals will conduct electricity better than plastics.
• Reflection : Shiny surfaces reflect more light than dull surfaces.

Strong Science Hypothesis Statement Examples

These are more detailed and specific hypotheses, often relating to a well-defined scientific question. They may also suggest a precise outcome or relationship. For example, “Vaccination and Immunity” indicates a specific result (production of specific antibodies) in response to a defined action (vaccinating mice).

• Environmental Toxins and Cell Growth : Exposure to specific environmental toxins will inhibit the division of cells in an organism.
• Nutrition and Cognitive Performance : Diets rich in omega-3 fatty acids will significantly enhance cognitive performance in adults over 60.
• Genetic Mutations and Disease Resistance : Specific genetic mutations in fruit flies will confer resistance to a particular pesticide.
• Neurotransmitters and Behavior : An increase in serotonin levels in the brain will lead to a decrease in aggressive behaviors in rats.
• Plant Pathogens and Resistance : Tomato plants genetically modified to express the XYZ gene will resist infection from the ABC pathogen more effectively than non-modified plants.
• Vaccination and Immunity : Vaccinating mice with a particular strain of virus will lead to the production of specific antibodies that prevent future infections.
• Hormonal Levels and Bone Density : Post-menopausal women with decreased estrogen levels will have a significant reduction in bone density compared to pre-menopausal women.
• Enzyme Concentration and Reaction Rate : Doubling the concentration of an enzyme in a solution will double the rate of the substrate’s conversion to the product.
• Climate Change and Coral Bleaching : An increase in sea surface temperature by 2°C will lead to a 50% increase in coral bleaching events.
• Pesticides and Pollinator Health : Exposure to the pesticide DEF will reduce the foraging ability of honeybees by at least 30%.

Scientific Hypothesis Statement Examples

These are broader scientific hypothesis applicable to different scientific disciplines. They’re structured to make clear, testable predictions about the relationship between variables. “Bacterial Growth,” for instance, predicts the outcome of bacteria exposed to UV light.

• Bacterial Growth : Bacteria exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light will have a reduced growth rate compared to those not exposed to UV light.
• Antibiotic Resistance : Overuse of antibiotics in livestock will lead to an increase in antibiotic-resistant bacteria in humans.
• Evolutionary Adaptation : Birds with longer beaks will have an advantage in accessing food after a drastic environmental change.
• Photosynthesis Rate : Plants grown under red light will have a lower rate of photosynthesis compared to those grown under blue light.
• Stem Cell Differentiation : The presence of growth factor X will guide stem cells to differentiate into nerve cells more frequently than muscle cells.
• Ozone Layer and UV Radiation : Depletion of the ozone layer will result in increased UV radiation levels on Earth’s surface.
• Protein Folding : Mutation at position 123 in protein Z will lead to a misfolded protein structure.
• Water Quality and Fish Health : Rivers with high levels of industrial pollutants will have a reduced fish population due to compromised gill functionality.
• Seismic Activity and Plate Tectonics : Regions located at the boundaries of tectonic plates will experience more frequent and stronger earthquakes.
• Drug Efficacy : Patients treated with drug Y will recover from infection twice as fast as those treated with a placebo.

Alternative Hypothesis Statement Examples for Science

The alternative hypothesis states that there is a statistically significant relationship between two variables. It’s what you might want to prove or demonstrate. For example, the hypothesis about “Green Tea and Metabolism” suggests that drinking green tea can have a positive effect on metabolic rates.

• Dietary Supplements and Energy Levels : Consuming a daily vitamin B12 supplement will increase energy levels in vegans.
• Soil Type and Crop Yield : Sandy soil will produce a lower maize yield than loamy soil.
• Air Pollution and Respiratory Diseases : Living in areas with higher particulate matter (PM2.5) levels will increase the incidence of respiratory diseases.
• Green Tea and Metabolism : Drinking green tea daily will increase metabolic rates in adults.
• Exercise and Brain Health : Engaging in regular aerobic exercise will increase cognitive function in older adults.
• Artificial Sweeteners and Appetite : Consuming artificial sweeteners will increase appetite in individuals.
• Forest Density and Wildlife Diversity : Forests with higher tree density will support a more diverse range of wildlife.
• Hydration and Skin Health : Drinking at least 2 liters of water daily will improve skin elasticity.
• Biofuels and Engine Performance : Engines running on biofuel will have a higher fuel efficiency than those running on traditional petroleum fuels.
• Artificial Light and Plant Growth : Plants grown under LED lights will have a faster growth rate than those grown under fluorescent lights.

Null Hypothesis Statement Examples for Science

The null hypothesis posits that there is no relationship between two variables. It’s the statement you want to test against. Scientists often set out to reject the null hypothesis to demonstrate there’s a relationship. For instance, “Diet and Weight Loss” asserts there’s no difference in weight loss outcomes between two diet types.

• Diet and Weight Loss : There is no difference in weight loss between individuals on a low-carb diet and those on a low-fat diet.
• Antibacterial Soap and Hand Hygiene : Using antibacterial soap does not decrease the number of bacteria on hands compared to using regular soap.
• Meditation and Blood Pressure : There is no difference in blood pressure levels between individuals who meditate daily and those who don’t.
• Organic Foods and Nutrient Content : Organic fruits and vegetables have the same nutrient content as non-organic fruits and vegetables.
• Pain Relievers and Pain Reduction : Over-the-counter pain reliever X does not reduce pain more effectively than a placebo.
• Educational Method and Learning : There is no difference in learning outcomes between students taught using method A and those taught using method B.
• Herbal Treatment and Sleep Duration : Herbal treatment Y does not increase sleep duration compared to a placebo.
• Sunscreen and Sunburn : There is no difference in sunburn incidence between individuals using sunscreen with SPF 30 and those using sunscreen with SPF 50.
• Caffeine and Alertness : Consuming caffeine does not increase alertness levels compared to not consuming caffeine.
• Probiotics and Gut Health : Taking daily probiotics does not increase the diversity of gut bacteria compared to not taking probiotics.

What is a good hypothesis for a science project?

A good hypothesis is a fundamental cornerstone for any scientific project. It provides direction for your research, helping you to focus your investigations and understand the potential outcomes. Here’s what characterizes a good hypothesis:

• Testable : A good hypothesis must be something that can be supported or refuted through experimentation, observation, or analysis.
• Clear and Concise : It should be straightforward and to the point, making it easier for you or others to test.
• Logical : It should make logical sense, building upon existing knowledge and literature.
• Specific : The hypothesis should clearly identify the variables and the relationship between them.
• Relevant : It should be pertinent to the subject matter and not diverge into unrelated areas.
• Predictive : It should make a clear prediction about what you expect to happen in your study.

How do you write a scientific hypothesis statement? – A Step by Step Guide

• Identify Your Research Question : Before you can draft a hypothesis, you need to determine what you’re trying to answer. For example, “Does the type of soil affect plant growth?”
• Perform Preliminary Research : Understand existing literature on the topic. This will help ensure that your hypothesis is original and rooted in current understanding.
• Independent Variable (what you change): e.g., type of soil.
• Dependent Variable (what you measure): e.g., plant growth.
• Make a Prediction : Based on your research, predict the relationship between your variables.
• If : Describes the change or treatment (independent variable).
• Then : Predicts the outcome (dependent variable).
• Because : Provides a rationale based on your background research. E.g., “If a plant is grown in sandy soil, then it will grow slower than in loamy soil, because sandy soil retains less water.”
• Keep it Simple : Avoid complex sentences or jargon. Your hypothesis should be understandable even to someone not in your field.
• Review and Revise : Once drafted, revisit your hypothesis. Ensure it aligns with your research question and that it remains clear and testable.

Tips for Writing Science Hypothesis

• Start with Curiosity : Your initial question should stem from genuine curiosity. It might begin as a broad query which you then refine.
• Use Open-Ended Questions : Start your question with words like “How,” “What,” or “Why.” These types of questions don’t presuppose an answer and lead to more in-depth investigation.
• One Variable at a Time : Especially for beginner projects, limit your hypothesis to one independent variable to keep your study focused and manageable.
• Avoid Biased Language : Your hypothesis should not show any personal biases. Instead of “I believe” or “I think,” use neutral terms.
• Stay Relevant to Available Tools and Resources : Ensure that you can test your hypothesis with the tools, time, and resources available to you.
• Peer Review : Before finalizing your question and hypothesis, have a peer or mentor review it. They might catch ambiguities or complexities you missed.
• Be Ready to Accept Any Outcome : A common mistake is becoming too attached to proving your hypothesis right. Remember, disproving a hypothesis can be just as valuable as proving it.

By carefully crafting your research question and hypothesis, you’ll set a solid foundation for your science project. Whether your results support or challenge your initial predictions, you’ll contribute to the vast and ever-growing body of scientific knowledge.

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

10 Examples of Public speaking

20 Examples of Gas lighting

What Are Assumptions?

• First Online: 28 November 2019

Cite this chapter

• Apollo M. Nkwake 2  

480 Accesses

Although the pertinence of implicit assumptions is underlined in theory-based evaluations, the nature of these assumptions has rarely been discussed. To understand the nature of underlying assumptions, it is necessary to review the notion of assumptions in general and their remarkable role in the generation of knowledge. This chapter discusses the nature of assumptions and groups them into ten categories according to Brookfield (Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1995) and according to the degree of articulation.

Even the most well-intentioned person unwittingly allows unconscious thoughts and feelings to influence apparently objective decisions. – Women in Science & Engineering Leadership Institute ( 2012 ) Every human society rests on assumptions that, most of the time, are not only unchallenged but not even reflected upon. In other words, in every society there are patterns of thought that most people accept without question as being of the very nature of things. – Trachman and Bluestone ( 2005 ) To deny a proposition is not the same as to confirm its denial … Given a proposition P, there is an associated proposition not-P. Either of these … may be merely supported or assumed. But when we deny P, we are not concerned with mere assumption, and there is nothing to be done with P that is logically equivalent to assuming not-P … the state of mind in which we reject a proposition is not the same as that in which we accept its negation. – Russell ( 1904 )

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/assumption

Akalis, S. A., Banaji, M. R., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Crime alert! How thinking about a single suspect automatically shifts stereotypes toward an entire group. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 5 (2), 217–233.

Article   Google Scholar  

Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1994). Implicit stereotyping and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario Symposium (17) (pp. 55–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Google Scholar  

Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7 (3), 136–141.

Bennett, G. E. (1933). Assumptions. The Accounting Review, 8 (2), 157–159.

Bernardo, A. E., Talley, E., & Welch, I. (2000). A theory of legal presumptions. Economics and Law, 16 (1), 1–49.

Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6 (3), 242–261.

Blair, I. V., Jennifer, E. M., & Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (5), 828–841.

Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher . San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Buchner, A., & Wippich, W. (1996). Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments? Consciousness and Cognition, 5 , 197–220.

Conley, F. K. (1998). Walking out on the boys . New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Cowgill, D. O. (1964). Value assumptions in recent research on migration. International Migration Digest, 1 (1), 29–33.

Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88 (2), 276–287.

Eliot, T. D. (1937). Reactions to predictive assumptions. American Sociological Review, 2 (4), 508–517.

Ennis, R. H. (1982). Identifying implicit assumptions. Synthese, 51 (1), 61–86.

Fogarty, R. J. (1994). How to teach metacognitive reflection (Mindful school) . New York, NY: Corwin Publishers.

Fried, L. P., Francomano, C. A., MacDonald, S. M., Wagner, E. M., Stokes, E. J., Carbone, K. M., … Stobo, J. D. (1996). Career development for women in academic medicine: Multiple interventions in a department of medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276 , 898–905.

Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29 (1), 17–28.

Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. an improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (2), 197–216.

Harste, J. C., Woodward, V. A., & Burke, C. L. (1984). Examining our assumptions: A transactional view of literacy and learning. Research in the Teaching of English, 18 (1), 84–108.

Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (3), 416–427.

Kanazawa, S. (1988). In defense of unrealistic assumptions. Sociological Theory, 16 (2), 193–204.

Kies, D. (1995). Underlying assumptions . Retrieved from http://papyr.com/hypertextbooks/comp2/assume.htm

Kotze, D. A. (1987). Contradictions and assumptions in community development. Community Development Journal, 22 (1), 31–36.

Mingers, J. A. (2003). Classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54 (6), 559–570.

Niemeyer, G. (1955). A query about assumptions on international organization. World Politics, 7 (2), 337–347.

Read, S. (2003). Freeing assumptions from the liar paradox. Analysis, 63 (2), 162–166.

Russell, B. (1904). Meinong's theory of complexes and assumptions. Mind New Series, 13 (51), 336–354.

Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96 (5), 949.

Sean, C., Draine, S. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (1996). Modeling unconscious gender bias in fame judgments: Finding the proper branch of the correct (multinomial) tree. Consciousness and Cognition, 5 , 221–225.

Sherman, B., & Harman, G. (2011). Knowledge and assumptions. Philosophical Studies, 156 , 131–140.

Shutts, K., Banaji, M. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Social categories guide young children’s preferences for novel objects. Developmental Science, 13 (4), 599–610.

Sosa, E. (1974). How do you know? American Philosophical Quarterly, 11 (2), 113–122.

Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34 , 379–440.

Stokoe, E. H., & Smithson, J. (2001). Making gender relevant: Conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction. Discourse & Society, 12 (2), 217–244.

Trachman, M., & Bluestone, C. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? College Teaching, 53 (4), 131–136.

Trix, F., & Psenka, C. (2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society, 14 (2), 191–220.

Ullman-Margalit, E. (1983). On presumption. The Journal of Philosophy, 80 (3), 143–163.

Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Valian, V. (2004). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia, 20 (3), 198–213.

Women in Science & Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI). (2012). Reviewing applicants: Research on bias and assumptions . Madison, WI: WISELI.

Zaman, M. H., & Rabbi, R. E. (2010, October 28). What are the descriptive assumptions in critical reading? [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://critical-readings.blogspot.com/2010/10/what-are-descriptive-assumptions-in.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Questions LLC, Maryland, MD, USA

Apollo M. Nkwake

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Nkwake, A.M. (2020). What Are Assumptions?. In: Working with Assumptions in International Development Program Evaluation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33004-0_6

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33004-0_6

Published : 28 November 2019

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-33003-3

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-33004-0

eBook Packages : Social Sciences Social Sciences (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

What is the difference between hypothesis and assumption?

As nouns the difference between hypothesis and assumption, derived terms, related terms, external links.

• Health Tech
• Health Insurance
• Medical Devices
• Gene Therapy
• Neuroscience
• H5N1 Bird Flu
• Health Disparities
• Infectious Disease
• Mental Health
• Cardiovascular Disease
• Chronic Disease
• Alzheimer's
• Coercive Care
• The Obesity Revolution
• The War on Recovery
• Adam Feuerstein
• Matthew Herper
• Jennifer Adaeze Okwerekwu
• Ed Silverman
• CRISPR Tracker
• Breakthrough Device Tracker
• Generative AI Tracker
• Obesity Drug Tracker
• 2024 STAT Summit
• Wunderkinds Nomination
• STAT Madness
• STAT Brand Studio

Don't miss out

Subscribe to STAT+ today, for the best life sciences journalism in the industry

Kamala Harris’ views on health care were shaped by her mother, cancer researcher Shyamala Gopalan

By Rohan Rajeev July 26, 2024

A s Vice President Kamala Harris emerges as the likely Democratic candidate in the U.S. presidential race, her background on health care issues ranging from reproductive rights to drug pricing is attracting more attention. A look at the life and work of Harris’ late mother, the prominent breast cancer researcher Shyamala Gopalan, offers insights into the personal connections that have shaped Harris’ views on health and medicine.

Since assuming her role as vice president, Harris has been vocal about the legacy of her mother, who died of colon cancer in 2009.

advertisement

“My mother, Dr. Shyamala Gopalan, had two goals in life: to cure breast cancer and to raise my sister and me,” Harris posted on Facebook this past Mother’s Day.

Gopalan, who earned her Ph.D. in nutrition and endocrinology at the University of California, Berkeley, is best known for her research on the relationship between the progesterone receptor and breast cancer. Progesterone is the hormone responsible for the development of breast tissue and menstrual cycle regulation. Gopalan studied the misregulation of its receptor in mouse mammary glands, which provided insight into progesterone modulation in humans and how breast tissue responded to hormones more broadly.

We now know that imbalance or irregular signaling of progesterone can lead to excessive cell growth and tumor formations. Gopalan’s seminal work on hormones and breast cancer earned her an appointment on the President’s Special Commission on Breast Cancer under the Clinton administration.

Robert Cardiff, distinguished professor of pathology emeritus at the University of California Davis School of Medicine, worked with Gopalan at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Cardiff said Gopalan would ask him to look at her animals, saying it evolved into a friendship. “She regarded me as her pathologist,” Cardiff said.

“We used to joke: she thought a thousand words were better than a picture. I thought my pictures were better than a thousand words,” he added. Cardiff added that she had a “lively sense of humor.”

The span of Gopalan’s career took her from India, where she completed her undergraduate degree from University of Delhi, to California and later to France, Italy, and Canada. In Canada, she landed teaching and research positions at McGill University and the Jewish General Hospital.

Related: Kamala Harris, endorsed by Biden to replace him, is left of the president on health care

During her tenure at Jewish General Hospital, Gopalan also took on a collaboration with the National Institutes of Health. She studied heat shock proteins (HSPs) — a family of proteins overexpressed in response to environmental stresses. At the time, the proteins had been recently discovered to exist in mammals and to be produced in response to malignancy. Gopalan and her collaborators found links between hormone modulation and HSPs , implicating the importance of HSPs in understanding breast cancer.

While the partnership ended in 1992, Gopalan would go on to continue her work for the NIH as a peer reviewer. She returned to Berkeley as a researcher at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the last decade of her career.

In her 2019 memoir “The Truths We Hold: An American Journey,” Harris recounts how her mother’s work at the NIH shaped how she hopes to address problems in the health care system.

Sign up for Morning Rounds

Understand how science, health policy, and medicine shape the world every day

“I remember how proud my mother was to work with the NIH as a peer reviewer and collaborator with other experts in her field,” she wrote. “If we want our children to have cures for humanity’s most terrible diseases, we should invest in our national medical researchers, instead of relying on companies that would rather funnel money to their shareholders.”

Harris has also said that her mother’s illness changed how she thinks about health care. In a 2018 op-ed for the New York Times, Harris expressed her fears amid the news of her mother’s cancer diagnosis. “I remember thanking God she had Medicare,” Harris wrote. “I believe that health care should be a right, but the reality is that it is still a privilege in this country. We need that to change.”

Though Harris was always drawn more to the humanities and the arts, she wrote in her memoir about she was shaped by her mother’s scientific approach to questions. “When I’d ask her why something was the way it was, she wasn’t content to just give me the answer. She wanted me to formulate my own hypothesis, to use that as a starting point for further investigation, and to challenge my assumptions,” she wrote.

Related: Breast cancer study reveals a paradox of mastectomy

In public policy, Harris said, people seem to have “trouble embracing innovation. That’s in part because when you’re running for public office and you stand before the voters, you aren’t expected to have a hypothesis; you’re expected to have ‘the Plan.’”

Among the goals of the Biden-Harris administration was helping revamp the Cancer Moonshot initiative — an effort first established during the Obama administration with the goal of accelerating cancer research. At an event marking the next phase of the program in 2022, Harris commented on the importance of treating cancer in light of her mother’s work.

“When President Biden launched his Cancer Moonshot five years ago, I, of course, thought of my mother. We may not have ended cancer as we know it — not then, but there is still so much work to do and we are so much closer,” Harris said. Most recently, on July 15, the program announced upwards of $100 million will be invested in prevention, detection, and treatment of cancer in Africa.

Related: 3 questions for the future of Biden’s cancer moonshot

In a 2022 post on X, Harris described the day her mother told her that she had cancer was one of the worst days of her life. “She was my inspiration and dedicated her life to finding a cure for breast cancer. I will always fight for public funding for cancer research—too many lives have been cut short.”

Cardiff described how Gopalan carried herself with strength, even when dealing with a severe autoimmune disease. “At one time she was in a full body cast, and another time she had to have an operation on her spine to hold her spine together — and whenever she talked about it she was upbeat and laughing at herself,” he said.

“She had a spirit about her that was amazing,” Cardiff added.

Beyond what Gopalan imparted to her daughters, one of her lasting impacts was on her students. “Dozens of students populated her lab through the years,” her obituary reads. “Often of color and the first in their families to pursue careers in science, these students eagerly sought Shyamala’s mentorship, which often stretched beyond the lab to encompass lessons in life.”

“One thing that struck me is that she really cared about her students and took care of them,” Cardiff said. “The last conversation that we had together before she died, she wanted me to contact several of her students to make sure that they were OK and prospering.”

About the Author Reprints

Rohan rajeev.

Harvard Institute of Politics Intern

STAT encourages you to share your voice. We welcome your commentary, criticism, and expertise on our subscriber-only platform, STAT+ Connect

To submit a correction request, please visit our Contact Us page .

Recommended

Recommended Stories

STAT Plus: Physicians weigh in on potential impact of Trump’s ear wound: ‘It’s a matter of inches’

STAT Plus: What to know about Trump VP pick J.D. Vance’s health care views and investments

STAT Plus: Express Scripts overcharged postal workers by $45 million, audit says

STAT Plus: Biotech led by J&J veterans launches with $165 million for cancer, autoimmune therapies

STAT Plus: Jeff Shuren, medical devices head at FDA, to leave the agency