![hypothesis on regression Logo for Open Library Publishing Platform](https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/2022/05/cropped-OpenLibrary-Logo-transparent-copy.png)
Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.
![](http://nandemo.space/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
13.6 Testing the Regression Coefficients
Learning objectives.
- Conduct and interpret a hypothesis test on individual regression coefficients.
Previously, we learned that the population model for the multiple regression equation is
[latex]\begin{eqnarray*} y & = & \beta_0+\beta_1x_1+\beta_2x_2+\cdots+\beta_kx_k +\epsilon \end{eqnarray*}[/latex]
where [latex]x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_k[/latex] are the independent variables, [latex]\beta_0,\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_k[/latex] are the population parameters of the regression coefficients, and [latex]\epsilon[/latex] is the error variable. In multiple regression, we estimate each population regression coefficient [latex]\beta_i[/latex] with the sample regression coefficient [latex]b_i[/latex].
In the previous section, we learned how to conduct an overall model test to determine if the regression model is valid. If the outcome of the overall model test is that the model is valid, then at least one of the independent variables is related to the dependent variable—in other words, at least one of the regression coefficients [latex]\beta_i[/latex] is not zero. However, the overall model test does not tell us which independent variables are related to the dependent variable. To determine which independent variables are related to the dependent variable, we must test each of the regression coefficients.
Testing the Regression Coefficients
For an individual regression coefficient, we want to test if there is a relationship between the dependent variable [latex]y[/latex] and the independent variable [latex]x_i[/latex].
- No Relationship . There is no relationship between the dependent variable [latex]y[/latex] and the independent variable [latex]x_i[/latex]. In this case, the regression coefficient [latex]\beta_i[/latex] is zero. This is the claim for the null hypothesis in an individual regression coefficient test: [latex]H_0: \beta_i=0[/latex].
- Relationship. There is a relationship between the dependent variable [latex]y[/latex] and the independent variable [latex]x_i[/latex]. In this case, the regression coefficients [latex]\beta_i[/latex] is not zero. This is the claim for the alternative hypothesis in an individual regression coefficient test: [latex]H_a: \beta_i \neq 0[/latex]. We are not interested if the regression coefficient [latex]\beta_i[/latex] is positive or negative, only that it is not zero. We only need to find out if the regression coefficient is not zero to demonstrate that there is a relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable. This makes the test on a regression coefficient a two-tailed test.
In order to conduct a hypothesis test on an individual regression coefficient [latex]\beta_i[/latex], we need to use the distribution of the sample regression coefficient [latex]b_i[/latex]:
- The mean of the distribution of the sample regression coefficient is the population regression coefficient [latex]\beta_i[/latex].
- The standard deviation of the distribution of the sample regression coefficient is [latex]\sigma_{b_i}[/latex]. Because we do not know the population standard deviation we must estimate [latex]\sigma_{b_i}[/latex] with the sample standard deviation [latex]s_{b_i}[/latex].
- The distribution of the sample regression coefficient follows a normal distribution.
Steps to Conduct a Hypothesis Test on a Regression Coefficient
[latex]\begin{eqnarray*} H_0: & & \beta_i=0 \\ \\ \end{eqnarray*}[/latex]
[latex]\begin{eqnarray*} H_a: & & \beta_i \neq 0 \\ \\ \end{eqnarray*}[/latex]
- Collect the sample information for the test and identify the significance level [latex]\alpha[/latex].
[latex]\begin{eqnarray*}t & = & \frac{b_i-\beta_i}{s_{b_i}} \\ \\ df & = & n-k-1 \\ \\ \end{eqnarray*}[/latex]
- The results of the sample data are significant. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the null hypothesis [latex]H_0[/latex] is an incorrect belief and that the alternative hypothesis [latex]H_a[/latex] is most likely correct.
- The results of the sample data are not significant. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the alternative hypothesis [latex]H_a[/latex] may be correct.
- Write down a concluding sentence specific to the context of the question.
The required [latex]t[/latex]-score and p -value for the test can be found on the regression summary table, which we learned how to generate in Excel in a previous section.
The human resources department at a large company wants to develop a model to predict an employee’s job satisfaction from the number of hours of unpaid work per week the employee does, the employee’s age, and the employee’s income. A sample of 25 employees at the company is taken and the data is recorded in the table below. The employee’s income is recorded in $1000s and the job satisfaction score is out of 10, with higher values indicating greater job satisfaction.
4 | 3 | 23 | 60 |
5 | 8 | 32 | 114 |
2 | 9 | 28 | 45 |
6 | 4 | 60 | 187 |
7 | 3 | 62 | 175 |
8 | 1 | 43 | 125 |
7 | 6 | 60 | 93 |
3 | 3 | 37 | 57 |
5 | 2 | 24 | 47 |
5 | 5 | 64 | 128 |
7 | 2 | 28 | 66 |
8 | 1 | 66 | 146 |
5 | 7 | 35 | 89 |
2 | 5 | 37 | 56 |
4 | 0 | 59 | 65 |
6 | 2 | 32 | 95 |
5 | 6 | 76 | 82 |
7 | 5 | 25 | 90 |
9 | 0 | 55 | 137 |
8 | 3 | 34 | 91 |
7 | 5 | 54 | 184 |
9 | 1 | 57 | 60 |
7 | 0 | 68 | 39 |
10 | 2 | 66 | 187 |
5 | 0 | 50 | 49 |
Previously, we found the multiple regression equation to predict the job satisfaction score from the other variables:
[latex]\begin{eqnarray*} \hat{y} & = & 4.7993-0.3818x_1+0.0046x_2+0.0233x_3 \\ \\ \hat{y} & = & \mbox{predicted job satisfaction score} \\ x_1 & = & \mbox{hours of unpaid work per week} \\ x_2 & = & \mbox{age} \\ x_3 & = & \mbox{income (\$1000s)}\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]
At the 5% significance level, test the relationship between the dependent variable “job satisfaction” and the independent variable “hours of unpaid work per week”.
Hypotheses:
[latex]\begin{eqnarray*} H_0: & & \beta_1=0 \\ H_a: & & \beta_1 \neq 0 \end{eqnarray*}[/latex]
The regression summary table generated by Excel is shown below:
Multiple R | 0.711779225 | |||||
R Square | 0.506629665 | |||||
Adjusted R Square | 0.436148189 | |||||
Standard Error | 1.585212784 | |||||
Observations | 25 | |||||
Regression | 3 | 54.189109 | 18.06303633 | 7.18812504 | 0.001683189 | |
Residual | 21 | 52.770891 | 2.512899571 | |||
Total | 24 | 106.96 | ||||
Intercept | 4.799258185 | 1.197185164 | 4.008785216 | 0.00063622 | 2.309575344 | 7.288941027 |
Hours of Unpaid Work per Week | -0.38184722 | 0.130750479 | -2.9204269 | 0.008177146 | -0.65375772 | -0.10993671 |
Age | 0.004555815 | 0.022855709 | 0.199329423 | 0.843922453 | -0.04297523 | 0.052086864 |
Income ($1000s) | 0.023250418 | 0.007610353 | 3.055103771 | 0.006012895 | 0.007423823 | 0.039077013 |
The p -value for the test on the hours of unpaid work per week regression coefficient is in the bottom part of the table under the P-value column of the Hours of Unpaid Work per Week row . So the p -value=[latex]0.0082[/latex].
Conclusion:
Because p -value[latex]=0.0082 \lt 0.05=\alpha[/latex], we reject the null hypothesis in favour of the alternative hypothesis. At the 5% significance level there is enough evidence to suggest that there is a relationship between the dependent variable “job satisfaction” and the independent variable “hours of unpaid work per week.”
- The null hypothesis [latex]\beta_1=0[/latex] is the claim that the regression coefficient for the independent variable [latex]x_1[/latex] is zero. That is, the null hypothesis is the claim that there is no relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable “hours of unpaid work per week.”
- The alternative hypothesis is the claim that the regression coefficient for the independent variable [latex]x_1[/latex] is not zero. The alternative hypothesis is the claim that there is a relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable “hours of unpaid work per week.”
- When conducting a test on a regression coefficient, make sure to use the correct subscript on [latex]\beta[/latex] to correspond to how the independent variables were defined in the regression model and which independent variable is being tested. Here the subscript on [latex]\beta[/latex] is 1 because the “hours of unpaid work per week” is defined as [latex]x_1[/latex] in the regression model.
- The p -value for the tests on the regression coefficients are located in the bottom part of the table under the P-value column heading in the corresponding independent variable row.
- Because the alternative hypothesis is a [latex]\neq[/latex], the p -value is the sum of the area in the tails of the [latex]t[/latex]-distribution. This is the value calculated out by Excel in the regression summary table.
- The p -value of 0.0082 is a small probability compared to the significance level, and so is unlikely to happen assuming the null hypothesis is true. This suggests that the assumption that the null hypothesis is true is most likely incorrect, and so the conclusion of the test is to reject the null hypothesis in favour of the alternative hypothesis. In other words, the regression coefficient [latex]\beta_1[/latex] is not zero, and so there is a relationship between the dependent variable “job satisfaction” and the independent variable “hours of unpaid work per week.” This means that the independent variable “hours of unpaid work per week” is useful in predicting the dependent variable.
At the 5% significance level, test the relationship between the dependent variable “job satisfaction” and the independent variable “age”.
[latex]\begin{eqnarray*} H_0: & & \beta_2=0 \\ H_a: & & \beta_2 \neq 0 \end{eqnarray*}[/latex]
The p -value for the test on the age regression coefficient is in the bottom part of the table under the P-value column of the Age row . So the p -value=[latex]0.8439[/latex].
Because p -value[latex]=0.8439 \gt 0.05=\alpha[/latex], we do not reject the null hypothesis. At the 5% significance level there is not enough evidence to suggest that there is a relationship between the dependent variable “job satisfaction” and the independent variable “age.”
- The null hypothesis [latex]\beta_2=0[/latex] is the claim that the regression coefficient for the independent variable [latex]x_2[/latex] is zero. That is, the null hypothesis is the claim that there is no relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable “age.”
- The alternative hypothesis is the claim that the regression coefficient for the independent variable [latex]x_2[/latex] is not zero. The alternative hypothesis is the claim that there is a relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable “age.”
- When conducting a test on a regression coefficient, make sure to use the correct subscript on [latex]\beta[/latex] to correspond to how the independent variables were defined in the regression model and which independent variable is being tested. Here the subscript on [latex]\beta[/latex] is 2 because “age” is defined as [latex]x_2[/latex] in the regression model.
- The p -value of 0.8439 is a large probability compared to the significance level, and so is likely to happen assuming the null hypothesis is true. This suggests that the assumption that the null hypothesis is true is most likely correct, and so the conclusion of the test is to not reject the null hypothesis. In other words, the regression coefficient [latex]\beta_2[/latex] is zero, and so there is no relationship between the dependent variable “job satisfaction” and the independent variable “age.” This means that the independent variable “age” is not particularly useful in predicting the dependent variable.
At the 5% significance level, test the relationship between the dependent variable “job satisfaction” and the independent variable “income”.
[latex]\begin{eqnarray*} H_0: & & \beta_3=0 \\ H_a: & & \beta_3 \neq 0 \end{eqnarray*}[/latex]
The p -value for the test on the income regression coefficient is in the bottom part of the table under the P-value column of the Income row . So the p -value=[latex]0.0060[/latex].
Because p -value[latex]=0.0060 \lt 0.05=\alpha[/latex], we reject the null hypothesis in favour of the alternative hypothesis. At the 5% significance level there is enough evidence to suggest that there is a relationship between the dependent variable “job satisfaction” and the independent variable “income.”
- The null hypothesis [latex]\beta_3=0[/latex] is the claim that the regression coefficient for the independent variable [latex]x_3[/latex] is zero. That is, the null hypothesis is the claim that there is no relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable “income.”
- The alternative hypothesis is the claim that the regression coefficient for the independent variable [latex]x_3[/latex] is not zero. The alternative hypothesis is the claim that there is a relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable “income.”
- When conducting a test on a regression coefficient, make sure to use the correct subscript on [latex]\beta[/latex] to correspond to how the independent variables were defined in the regression model and which independent variable is being tested. Here the subscript on [latex]\beta[/latex] is 3 because “income” is defined as [latex]x_3[/latex] in the regression model.
- The p -value of 0.0060 is a small probability compared to the significance level, and so is unlikely to happen assuming the null hypothesis is true. This suggests that the assumption that the null hypothesis is true is most likely incorrect, and so the conclusion of the test is to reject the null hypothesis in favour of the alternative hypothesis. In other words, the regression coefficient [latex]\beta_3[/latex] is not zero, and so there is a relationship between the dependent variable “job satisfaction” and the independent variable “income.” This means that the independent variable “income” is useful in predicting the dependent variable.
Concept Review
The test on a regression coefficient determines if there is a relationship between the dependent variable and the corresponding independent variable. The p -value for the test is the sum of the area in tails of the [latex]t[/latex]-distribution. The p -value can be found on the regression summary table generated by Excel.
The hypothesis test for a regression coefficient is a well established process:
- Write down the null and alternative hypotheses in terms of the regression coefficient being tested. The null hypothesis is the claim that there is no relationship between the dependent variable and independent variable. The alternative hypothesis is the claim that there is a relationship between the dependent variable and independent variable.
- Collect the sample information for the test and identify the significance level.
- The p -value is the sum of the area in the tails of the [latex]t[/latex]-distribution. Use the regression summary table generated by Excel to find the p -value.
- Compare the p -value to the significance level and state the outcome of the test.
Introduction to Statistics Copyright © 2022 by Valerie Watts is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
Linear regression - Hypothesis testing
by Marco Taboga , PhD
This lecture discusses how to perform tests of hypotheses about the coefficients of a linear regression model estimated by ordinary least squares (OLS).
Table of contents
Normal vs non-normal model
The linear regression model, matrix notation, tests of hypothesis in the normal linear regression model, test of a restriction on a single coefficient (t test), test of a set of linear restrictions (f test), tests based on maximum likelihood procedures (wald, lagrange multiplier, likelihood ratio), tests of hypothesis when the ols estimator is asymptotically normal, test of a restriction on a single coefficient (z test), test of a set of linear restrictions (chi-square test), learn more about regression analysis.
The lecture is divided in two parts:
in the first part, we discuss hypothesis testing in the normal linear regression model , in which the OLS estimator of the coefficients has a normal distribution conditional on the matrix of regressors;
in the second part, we show how to carry out hypothesis tests in linear regression analyses where the hypothesis of normality holds only in large samples (i.e., the OLS estimator can be proved to be asymptotically normal).
![hypothesis on regression How to choose which test to carry out after estimating a linear regression model.](https://www.statlect.com/images/linear-regression-hypothesis-testing.png)
We also denote:
We now explain how to derive tests about the coefficients of the normal linear regression model.
It can be proved (see the lecture about the normal linear regression model ) that the assumption of conditional normality implies that:
How the acceptance region is determined depends not only on the desired size of the test , but also on whether the test is:
one-tailed (only one of the two things, i.e., either smaller or larger, is possible).
For more details on how to determine the acceptance region, see the glossary entry on critical values .
![hypothesis on regression [eq28]](https://www.statlect.com/images/linear-regression-hypothesis-testing__90.png)
The F test is one-tailed .
A critical value in the right tail of the F distribution is chosen so as to achieve the desired size of the test.
Then, the null hypothesis is rejected if the F statistics is larger than the critical value.
In this section we explain how to perform hypothesis tests about the coefficients of a linear regression model when the OLS estimator is asymptotically normal.
As we have shown in the lecture on the properties of the OLS estimator , in several cases (i.e., under different sets of assumptions) it can be proved that:
These two properties are used to derive the asymptotic distribution of the test statistics used in hypothesis testing.
The test can be either one-tailed or two-tailed . The same comments made for the t-test apply here.
![hypothesis on regression [eq50]](https://www.statlect.com/images/linear-regression-hypothesis-testing__175.png)
Like the F test, also the Chi-square test is usually one-tailed .
The desired size of the test is achieved by appropriately choosing a critical value in the right tail of the Chi-square distribution.
The null is rejected if the Chi-square statistics is larger than the critical value.
Want to learn more about regression analysis? Here are some suggestions:
R squared of a linear regression ;
Gauss-Markov theorem ;
Generalized Least Squares ;
Multicollinearity ;
Dummy variables ;
Selection of linear regression models
Partitioned regression ;
Ridge regression .
How to cite
Please cite as:
Taboga, Marco (2021). "Linear regression - Hypothesis testing", Lectures on probability theory and mathematical statistics. Kindle Direct Publishing. Online appendix. https://www.statlect.com/fundamentals-of-statistics/linear-regression-hypothesis-testing.
Most of the learning materials found on this website are now available in a traditional textbook format.
- F distribution
- Beta distribution
- Conditional probability
- Central Limit Theorem
- Binomial distribution
- Mean square convergence
- Delta method
- Almost sure convergence
- Mathematical tools
- Fundamentals of probability
- Probability distributions
- Asymptotic theory
- Fundamentals of statistics
- About Statlect
- Cookies, privacy and terms of use
- Loss function
- Almost sure
- Type I error
- Precision matrix
- Integrable variable
- To enhance your privacy,
- we removed the social buttons,
- but don't forget to share .
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
- Simple Linear Regression | An Easy Introduction & Examples
Simple Linear Regression | An Easy Introduction & Examples
Published on February 19, 2020 by Rebecca Bevans . Revised on June 22, 2023.
Simple linear regression is used to estimate the relationship between two quantitative variables . You can use simple linear regression when you want to know:
- How strong the relationship is between two variables (e.g., the relationship between rainfall and soil erosion).
- The value of the dependent variable at a certain value of the independent variable (e.g., the amount of soil erosion at a certain level of rainfall).
Regression models describe the relationship between variables by fitting a line to the observed data. Linear regression models use a straight line, while logistic and nonlinear regression models use a curved line. Regression allows you to estimate how a dependent variable changes as the independent variable(s) change.
If you have more than one independent variable, use multiple linear regression instead.
Table of contents
Assumptions of simple linear regression, how to perform a simple linear regression, interpreting the results, presenting the results, can you predict values outside the range of your data, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about simple linear regression.
Simple linear regression is a parametric test , meaning that it makes certain assumptions about the data. These assumptions are:
- Homogeneity of variance (homoscedasticity) : the size of the error in our prediction doesn’t change significantly across the values of the independent variable.
- Independence of observations : the observations in the dataset were collected using statistically valid sampling methods , and there are no hidden relationships among observations.
- Normality : The data follows a normal distribution .
Linear regression makes one additional assumption:
- The relationship between the independent and dependent variable is linear : the line of best fit through the data points is a straight line (rather than a curve or some sort of grouping factor).
If your data do not meet the assumptions of homoscedasticity or normality, you may be able to use a nonparametric test instead, such as the Spearman rank test.
If your data violate the assumption of independence of observations (e.g., if observations are repeated over time), you may be able to perform a linear mixed-effects model that accounts for the additional structure in the data.
Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.
Simple linear regression formula.
The formula for a simple linear regression is:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com y = {\beta_0} + {\beta_1{X}} + {\epsilon}](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-24c2acc90e12e44ba70f7cae7508ae7e_l3.png)
- y is the predicted value of the dependent variable ( y ) for any given value of the independent variable ( x ).
- B 0 is the intercept , the predicted value of y when the x is 0.
- B 1 is the regression coefficient – how much we expect y to change as x increases.
- x is the independent variable ( the variable we expect is influencing y ).
- e is the error of the estimate, or how much variation there is in our estimate of the regression coefficient.
Linear regression finds the line of best fit line through your data by searching for the regression coefficient (B 1 ) that minimizes the total error (e) of the model.
While you can perform a linear regression by hand , this is a tedious process, so most people use statistical programs to help them quickly analyze the data.
Simple linear regression in R
R is a free, powerful, and widely-used statistical program. Download the dataset to try it yourself using our income and happiness example.
Dataset for simple linear regression (.csv)
Load the income.data dataset into your R environment, and then run the following command to generate a linear model describing the relationship between income and happiness:
This code takes the data you have collected data = income.data and calculates the effect that the independent variable income has on the dependent variable happiness using the equation for the linear model: lm() .
To learn more, follow our full step-by-step guide to linear regression in R .
To view the results of the model, you can use the summary() function in R:
This function takes the most important parameters from the linear model and puts them into a table, which looks like this:
![hypothesis on regression Simple linear regression summary output in R](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads//2020/02/simple-linear-regression-summary-output-in-r.png)
This output table first repeats the formula that was used to generate the results (‘Call’), then summarizes the model residuals (‘Residuals’), which give an idea of how well the model fits the real data.
Next is the ‘Coefficients’ table. The first row gives the estimates of the y-intercept, and the second row gives the regression coefficient of the model.
Row 1 of the table is labeled (Intercept) . This is the y-intercept of the regression equation, with a value of 0.20. You can plug this into your regression equation if you want to predict happiness values across the range of income that you have observed:
The next row in the ‘Coefficients’ table is income. This is the row that describes the estimated effect of income on reported happiness:
The Estimate column is the estimated effect , also called the regression coefficient or r 2 value. The number in the table (0.713) tells us that for every one unit increase in income (where one unit of income = 10,000) there is a corresponding 0.71-unit increase in reported happiness (where happiness is a scale of 1 to 10).
The Std. Error column displays the standard error of the estimate. This number shows how much variation there is in our estimate of the relationship between income and happiness.
The t value column displays the test statistic . Unless you specify otherwise, the test statistic used in linear regression is the t value from a two-sided t test . The larger the test statistic, the less likely it is that our results occurred by chance.
The Pr(>| t |) column shows the p value . This number tells us how likely we are to see the estimated effect of income on happiness if the null hypothesis of no effect were true.
Because the p value is so low ( p < 0.001), we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that income has a statistically significant effect on happiness.
The last three lines of the model summary are statistics about the model as a whole. The most important thing to notice here is the p value of the model. Here it is significant ( p < 0.001), which means that this model is a good fit for the observed data.
When reporting your results, include the estimated effect (i.e. the regression coefficient), standard error of the estimate, and the p value. You should also interpret your numbers to make it clear to your readers what your regression coefficient means:
It can also be helpful to include a graph with your results. For a simple linear regression, you can simply plot the observations on the x and y axis and then include the regression line and regression function:
![hypothesis on regression Simple linear regression graph](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads//2020/02/simple-linear-regression-graph.png)
Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
- Academic style
- Vague sentences
- Style consistency
See an example
![hypothesis on regression hypothesis on regression](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/dissertation-proofreading-service.png)
No! We often say that regression models can be used to predict the value of the dependent variable at certain values of the independent variable. However, this is only true for the range of values where we have actually measured the response.
We can use our income and happiness regression analysis as an example. Between 15,000 and 75,000, we found an r 2 of 0.73 ± 0.0193. But what if we did a second survey of people making between 75,000 and 150,000?
![hypothesis on regression Extrapolating data in R](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads//2020/02/extrapolating-data-in-r.png)
The r 2 for the relationship between income and happiness is now 0.21, or a 0.21-unit increase in reported happiness for every 10,000 increase in income. While the relationship is still statistically significant (p<0.001), the slope is much smaller than before.
![hypothesis on regression Extrapolating data in R graph](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads//2020/02/extrapolating-data-in-r-graph.png)
What if we hadn’t measured this group, and instead extrapolated the line from the 15–75k incomes to the 70–150k incomes?
You can see that if we simply extrapolated from the 15–75k income data, we would overestimate the happiness of people in the 75–150k income range.
![hypothesis on regression Curved data line](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads//2020/02/curved-data-line.png)
If we instead fit a curve to the data, it seems to fit the actual pattern much better.
It looks as though happiness actually levels off at higher incomes, so we can’t use the same regression line we calculated from our lower-income data to predict happiness at higher levels of income.
Even when you see a strong pattern in your data, you can’t know for certain whether that pattern continues beyond the range of values you have actually measured. Therefore, it’s important to avoid extrapolating beyond what the data actually tell you.
If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
- Chi square test of independence
- Statistical power
- Descriptive statistics
- Degrees of freedom
- Pearson correlation
- Null hypothesis
Methodology
- Double-blind study
- Case-control study
- Research ethics
- Data collection
- Hypothesis testing
- Structured interviews
Research bias
- Hawthorne effect
- Unconscious bias
- Recall bias
- Halo effect
- Self-serving bias
- Information bias
A regression model is a statistical model that estimates the relationship between one dependent variable and one or more independent variables using a line (or a plane in the case of two or more independent variables).
A regression model can be used when the dependent variable is quantitative, except in the case of logistic regression, where the dependent variable is binary.
Simple linear regression is a regression model that estimates the relationship between one independent variable and one dependent variable using a straight line. Both variables should be quantitative.
For example, the relationship between temperature and the expansion of mercury in a thermometer can be modeled using a straight line: as temperature increases, the mercury expands. This linear relationship is so certain that we can use mercury thermometers to measure temperature.
Linear regression most often uses mean-square error (MSE) to calculate the error of the model. MSE is calculated by:
- measuring the distance of the observed y-values from the predicted y-values at each value of x;
- squaring each of these distances;
- calculating the mean of each of the squared distances.
Linear regression fits a line to the data by finding the regression coefficient that results in the smallest MSE.
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Bevans, R. (2023, June 22). Simple Linear Regression | An Easy Introduction & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved August 26, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/simple-linear-regression/
Is this article helpful?
Rebecca Bevans
Other students also liked, an introduction to t tests | definitions, formula and examples, multiple linear regression | a quick guide (examples), linear regression in r | a step-by-step guide & examples, what is your plagiarism score.
- Prompt Library
- DS/AI Trends
- Stats Tools
- Interview Questions
- Generative AI
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
Linear regression hypothesis testing: Concepts, Examples
![hypothesis on regression Simple linear regression model](https://vitalflux.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Screenshot-2020-09-30-at-8.18.35-AM-300x223.png)
In relation to machine learning , linear regression is defined as a predictive modeling technique that allows us to build a model which can help predict continuous response variables as a function of a linear combination of explanatory or predictor variables. While training linear regression models, we need to rely on hypothesis testing in relation to determining the relationship between the response and predictor variables. In the case of the linear regression model, two types of hypothesis testing are done. They are T-tests and F-tests . In other words, there are two types of statistics that are used to assess whether linear regression models exist representing response and predictor variables. They are t-statistics and f-statistics. As data scientists , it is of utmost importance to determine if linear regression is the correct choice of model for our particular problem and this can be done by performing hypothesis testing related to linear regression response and predictor variables. Many times, it is found that these concepts are not very clear with a lot many data scientists. In this blog post, we will discuss linear regression and hypothesis testing related to t-statistics and f-statistics . We will also provide an example to help illustrate how these concepts work.
Table of Contents
What are linear regression models?
A linear regression model can be defined as the function approximation that represents a continuous response variable as a function of one or more predictor variables. While building a linear regression model, the goal is to identify a linear equation that best predicts or models the relationship between the response or dependent variable and one or more predictor or independent variables.
There are two different kinds of linear regression models. They are as follows:
- Simple or Univariate linear regression models : These are linear regression models that are used to build a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and one predictor or independent variable. The form of the equation that represents a simple linear regression model is Y=mX+b, where m is the coefficients of the predictor variable and b is bias. When considering the linear regression line, m represents the slope and b represents the intercept.
- Multiple or Multi-variate linear regression models : These are linear regression models that are used to build a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and more than one predictor or independent variable. The form of the equation that represents a multiple linear regression model is Y=b0+b1X1+ b2X2 + … + bnXn, where bi represents the coefficients of the ith predictor variable. In this type of linear regression model, each predictor variable has its own coefficient that is used to calculate the predicted value of the response variable.
While training linear regression models, the requirement is to determine the coefficients which can result in the best-fitted linear regression line. The learning algorithm used to find the most appropriate coefficients is known as least squares regression . In the least-squares regression method, the coefficients are calculated using the least-squares error function. The main objective of this method is to minimize or reduce the sum of squared residuals between actual and predicted response values. The sum of squared residuals is also called the residual sum of squares (RSS). The outcome of executing the least-squares regression method is coefficients that minimize the linear regression cost function .
The residual e of the ith observation is represented as the following where [latex]Y_i[/latex] is the ith observation and [latex]\hat{Y_i}[/latex] is the prediction for ith observation or the value of response variable for ith observation.
[latex]e_i = Y_i – \hat{Y_i}[/latex]
The residual sum of squares can be represented as the following:
[latex]RSS = e_1^2 + e_2^2 + e_3^2 + … + e_n^2[/latex]
The least-squares method represents the algorithm that minimizes the above term, RSS.
Once the coefficients are determined, can it be claimed that these coefficients are the most appropriate ones for linear regression? The answer is no. After all, the coefficients are only the estimates and thus, there will be standard errors associated with each of the coefficients. Recall that the standard error is used to calculate the confidence interval in which the mean value of the population parameter would exist. In other words, it represents the error of estimating a population parameter based on the sample data. The value of the standard error is calculated as the standard deviation of the sample divided by the square root of the sample size. The formula below represents the standard error of a mean.
[latex]SE(\mu) = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt(N)}[/latex]
Thus, without analyzing aspects such as the standard error associated with the coefficients, it cannot be claimed that the linear regression coefficients are the most suitable ones without performing hypothesis testing. This is where hypothesis testing is needed . Before we get into why we need hypothesis testing with the linear regression model, let’s briefly learn about what is hypothesis testing?
Train a Multiple Linear Regression Model using R
Before getting into understanding the hypothesis testing concepts in relation to the linear regression model, let’s train a multi-variate or multiple linear regression model and print the summary output of the model which will be referred to, in the next section.
The data used for creating a multi-linear regression model is BostonHousing which can be loaded in RStudioby installing mlbench package. The code is shown below:
install.packages(“mlbench”) library(mlbench) data(“BostonHousing”)
Once the data is loaded, the code shown below can be used to create the linear regression model.
attach(BostonHousing) BostonHousing.lm <- lm(log(medv) ~ crim + chas + rad + lstat) summary(BostonHousing.lm)
Executing the above command will result in the creation of a linear regression model with the response variable as medv and predictor variables as crim, chas, rad, and lstat. The following represents the details related to the response and predictor variables:
- log(medv) : Log of the median value of owner-occupied homes in USD 1000’s
- crim : Per capita crime rate by town
- chas : Charles River dummy variable (= 1 if tract bounds river; 0 otherwise)
- rad : Index of accessibility to radial highways
- lstat : Percentage of the lower status of the population
The following will be the output of the summary command that prints the details relating to the model including hypothesis testing details for coefficients (t-statistics) and the model as a whole (f-statistics)
![hypothesis on regression linear regression model summary table r.png](https://vitalflux.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/linear-regression-model-summary-table-r.png-640x291.jpg)
Hypothesis tests & Linear Regression Models
Hypothesis tests are the statistical procedure that is used to test a claim or assumption about the underlying distribution of a population based on the sample data. Here are key steps of doing hypothesis tests with linear regression models:
- Hypothesis formulation for T-tests: In the case of linear regression, the claim is made that there exists a relationship between response and predictor variables, and the claim is represented using the non-zero value of coefficients of predictor variables in the linear equation or regression model. This is formulated as an alternate hypothesis. Thus, the null hypothesis is set that there is no relationship between response and the predictor variables . Hence, the coefficients related to each of the predictor variables is equal to zero (0). So, if the linear regression model is Y = a0 + a1x1 + a2x2 + a3x3, then the null hypothesis for each test states that a1 = 0, a2 = 0, a3 = 0 etc. For all the predictor variables, individual hypothesis testing is done to determine whether the relationship between response and that particular predictor variable is statistically significant based on the sample data used for training the model. Thus, if there are, say, 5 features, there will be five hypothesis tests and each will have an associated null and alternate hypothesis.
- Hypothesis formulation for F-test : In addition, there is a hypothesis test done around the claim that there is a linear regression model representing the response variable and all the predictor variables. The null hypothesis is that the linear regression model does not exist . This essentially means that the value of all the coefficients is equal to zero. So, if the linear regression model is Y = a0 + a1x1 + a2x2 + a3x3, then the null hypothesis states that a1 = a2 = a3 = 0.
- F-statistics for testing hypothesis for linear regression model : F-test is used to test the null hypothesis that a linear regression model does not exist, representing the relationship between the response variable y and the predictor variables x1, x2, x3, x4 and x5. The null hypothesis can also be represented as x1 = x2 = x3 = x4 = x5 = 0. F-statistics is calculated as a function of sum of squares residuals for restricted regression (representing linear regression model with only intercept or bias and all the values of coefficients as zero) and sum of squares residuals for unrestricted regression (representing linear regression model). In the above diagram, note the value of f-statistics as 15.66 against the degrees of freedom as 5 and 194.
- Evaluate t-statistics against the critical value/region : After calculating the value of t-statistics for each coefficient, it is now time to make a decision about whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis. In order for this decision to be made, one needs to set a significance level, which is also known as the alpha level. The significance level of 0.05 is usually set for rejecting the null hypothesis or otherwise. If the value of t-statistics fall in the critical region, the null hypothesis is rejected. Or, if the p-value comes out to be less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.
- Evaluate f-statistics against the critical value/region : The value of F-statistics and the p-value is evaluated for testing the null hypothesis that the linear regression model representing response and predictor variables does not exist. If the value of f-statistics is more than the critical value at the level of significance as 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected. This means that the linear model exists with at least one valid coefficients.
- Draw conclusions : The final step of hypothesis testing is to draw a conclusion by interpreting the results in terms of the original claim or hypothesis. If the null hypothesis of one or more predictor variables is rejected, it represents the fact that the relationship between the response and the predictor variable is not statistically significant based on the evidence or the sample data we used for training the model. Similarly, if the f-statistics value lies in the critical region and the value of the p-value is less than the alpha value usually set as 0.05, one can say that there exists a linear regression model.
Why hypothesis tests for linear regression models?
The reasons why we need to do hypothesis tests in case of a linear regression model are following:
- By creating the model, we are establishing a new truth (claims) about the relationship between response or dependent variable with one or more predictor or independent variables. In order to justify the truth, there are needed one or more tests. These tests can be termed as an act of testing the claim (or new truth) or in other words, hypothesis tests.
- One kind of test is required to test the relationship between response and each of the predictor variables (hence, T-tests)
- Another kind of test is required to test the linear regression model representation as a whole. This is called F-test.
While training linear regression models, hypothesis testing is done to determine whether the relationship between the response and each of the predictor variables is statistically significant or otherwise. The coefficients related to each of the predictor variables is determined. Then, individual hypothesis tests are done to determine whether the relationship between response and that particular predictor variable is statistically significant based on the sample data used for training the model. If at least one of the null hypotheses is rejected, it represents the fact that there exists no relationship between response and that particular predictor variable. T-statistics is used for performing the hypothesis testing because the standard deviation of the sampling distribution is unknown. The value of t-statistics is compared with the critical value from the t-distribution table in order to make a decision about whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis regarding the relationship between the response and predictor variables. If the value falls in the critical region, then the null hypothesis is rejected which means that there is no relationship between response and that predictor variable. In addition to T-tests, F-test is performed to test the null hypothesis that the linear regression model does not exist and that the value of all the coefficients is zero (0). Learn more about the linear regression and t-test in this blog – Linear regression t-test: formula, example .
Recent Posts
![hypothesis on regression Ajitesh Kumar](https://vitalflux.com/wp-content/uploads/gravatar/ajitesh-shukla-pic.jpg)
- Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1-Score – Python Examples - August 27, 2024
- Logistic Regression in Machine Learning: Python Example - August 26, 2024
- Reducing Overfitting vs Models Complexity: Machine Learning - August 25, 2024
Ajitesh Kumar
One response.
Very informative
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
- Search for:
ChatGPT Prompts (250+)
- Generate Design Ideas for App
- Expand Feature Set of App
- Create a User Journey Map for App
- Generate Visual Design Ideas for App
- Generate a List of Competitors for App
- Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1-Score – Python Examples
- Logistic Regression in Machine Learning: Python Example
- Reducing Overfitting vs Models Complexity: Machine Learning
- Model Parallelism vs Data Parallelism: Examples
- Overfitting & Underfitting in Machine Learning
Data Science / AI Trends
- • Prepend any arxiv.org link with talk2 to load the paper into a responsive chat application
- • Custom LLM and AI Agents (RAG) On Structured + Unstructured Data - AI Brain For Your Organization
- • Guides, papers, lecture, notebooks and resources for prompt engineering
- • Common tricks to make LLMs efficient and stable
- • Machine learning in finance
Free Online Tools
- Create Scatter Plots Online for your Excel Data
- Histogram / Frequency Distribution Creation Tool
- Online Pie Chart Maker Tool
- Z-test vs T-test Decision Tool
- Independent samples t-test calculator
Recent Comments
I found it very helpful. However the differences are not too understandable for me
Very Nice Explaination. Thankyiu very much,
in your case E respresent Member or Oraganization which include on e or more peers?
Such a informative post. Keep it up
Thank you....for your support. you given a good solution for me.
User Preferences
Content preview.
Arcu felis bibendum ut tristique et egestas quis:
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident
Keyboard Shortcuts
6.4 - the hypothesis tests for the slopes.
At the beginning of this lesson, we translated three different research questions pertaining to heart attacks in rabbits ( Cool Hearts dataset ) into three sets of hypotheses we can test using the general linear F -statistic. The research questions and their corresponding hypotheses are:
Hypotheses 1
Is the regression model containing at least one predictor useful in predicting the size of the infarct?
- \(H_{0} \colon \beta_{1} = \beta_{2} = \beta_{3} = 0\)
- \(H_{A} \colon\) At least one \(\beta_{j} ≠ 0\) (for j = 1, 2, 3)
Hypotheses 2
Is the size of the infarct significantly (linearly) related to the area of the region at risk?
- \(H_{0} \colon \beta_{1} = 0 \)
- \(H_{A} \colon \beta_{1} \ne 0 \)
Hypotheses 3
(Primary research question) Is the size of the infarct area significantly (linearly) related to the type of treatment upon controlling for the size of the region at risk for infarction?
- \(H_{0} \colon \beta_{2} = \beta_{3} = 0\)
- \(H_{A} \colon \) At least one \(\beta_{j} ≠ 0\) (for j = 2, 3)
Let's test each of the hypotheses now using the general linear F -statistic:
\(F^*=\left(\dfrac{SSE(R)-SSE(F)}{df_R-df_F}\right) \div \left(\dfrac{SSE(F)}{df_F}\right)\)
To calculate the F -statistic for each test, we first determine the error sum of squares for the reduced and full models — SSE ( R ) and SSE ( F ), respectively. The number of error degrees of freedom associated with the reduced and full models — \(df_{R}\) and \(df_{F}\), respectively — is the number of observations, n , minus the number of parameters, p , in the model. That is, in general, the number of error degrees of freedom is n - p . We use statistical software, such as Minitab's F -distribution probability calculator, to determine the P -value for each test.
Testing all slope parameters equal 0 Section
To answer the research question: "Is the regression model containing at least one predictor useful in predicting the size of the infarct?" To do so, we test the hypotheses:
- \(H_{0} \colon \beta_{1} = \beta_{2} = \beta_{3} = 0 \)
- \(H_{A} \colon\) At least one \(\beta_{j} \ne 0 \) (for j = 1, 2, 3)
The full model
The full model is the largest possible model — that is, the model containing all of the possible predictors. In this case, the full model is:
\(y_i=(\beta_0+\beta_1x_{i1}+\beta_2x_{i2}+\beta_3x_{i3})+\epsilon_i\)
The error sum of squares for the full model, SSE ( F ), is just the usual error sum of squares, SSE , that appears in the analysis of variance table. Because there are 4 parameters in the full model, the number of error degrees of freedom associated with the full model is \(df_{F} = n - 4\).
The reduced model
The reduced model is the model that the null hypothesis describes. Because the null hypothesis sets each of the slope parameters in the full model equal to 0, the reduced model is:
\(y_i=\beta_0+\epsilon_i\)
The reduced model suggests that none of the variations in the response y is explained by any of the predictors. Therefore, the error sum of squares for the reduced model, SSE ( R ), is just the total sum of squares, SSTO , that appears in the analysis of variance table. Because there is only one parameter in the reduced model, the number of error degrees of freedom associated with the reduced model is \(df_{R} = n - 1 \).
Upon plugging in the above quantities, the general linear F -statistic:
\(F^*=\dfrac{SSE(R)-SSE(F)}{df_R-df_F} \div \dfrac{SSE(F)}{df_F}\)
becomes the usual " overall F -test ":
\(F^*=\dfrac{SSR}{3} \div \dfrac{SSE}{n-4}=\dfrac{MSR}{MSE}\)
That is, to test \(H_{0}\) : \(\beta_{1} = \beta_{2} = \beta_{3} = 0 \), we just use the overall F -test and P -value reported in the analysis of variance table:
Analysis of Variance
Source | DF | Adj SS | Adj MS | F- Value | P-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regression | 3 | 0.95927 | 0.31976 | 16.43 | 0.000 |
Area | 1 | 0.63742 | 0.63742 | 32.75 | 0.000 |
X2 | 1 | 0.29733 | 0.29733 | 15.28 | 0.001 |
X3 | 1 | 0.01981 | 0.01981 | 1.02 | 0.322 |
Error | 28 | 0.54491 | 0.01946 | ||
31 | 1.50418 |
![](http://nandemo.space/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Regression Equation
Inf = - 0.135 + 0.613 Area - 0.2435 X2 - 0.0657 X3
There is sufficient evidence ( F = 16.43, P < 0.001) to conclude that at least one of the slope parameters is not equal to 0.
In general, to test that all of the slope parameters in a multiple linear regression model are 0, we use the overall F -test reported in the analysis of variance table.
Testing one slope parameter is 0 Section
Now let's answer the second research question: "Is the size of the infarct significantly (linearly) related to the area of the region at risk?" To do so, we test the hypotheses:
Again, the full model is the model containing all of the possible predictors:
The error sum of squares for the full model, SSE ( F ), is just the usual error sum of squares, SSE . Alternatively, because the three predictors in the model are \(x_{1}\), \(x_{2}\), and \(x_{3}\), we can denote the error sum of squares as SSE (\(x_{1}\), \(x_{2}\), \(x_{3}\)). Again, because there are 4 parameters in the model, the number of error degrees of freedom associated with the full model is \(df_{F} = n - 4 \).
Because the null hypothesis sets the first slope parameter, \(\beta_{1}\), equal to 0, the reduced model is:
\(y_i=(\beta_0+\beta_2x_{i2}+\beta_3x_{i3})+\epsilon_i\)
Because the two predictors in the model are \(x_{2}\) and \(x_{3}\), we denote the error sum of squares as SSE (\(x_{2}\), \(x_{3}\)). Because there are 3 parameters in the model, the number of error degrees of freedom associated with the reduced model is \(df_{R} = n - 3\).
The general linear statistic:
simplifies to:
\(F^*=\dfrac{SSR(x_1|x_2, x_3)}{1}\div \dfrac{SSE(x_1,x_2, x_3)}{n-4}=\dfrac{MSR(x_1|x_2, x_3)}{MSE(x_1,x_2, x_3)}\)
Getting the numbers from the Minitab output:
we determine that the value of the F -statistic is:
\(F^* = \dfrac{SSR(x_1 \vert x_2, x_3)}{1} \div \dfrac{SSE(x_1, x_2, x_3)}{28} = \dfrac{0.63742}{0.01946}=32.7554\)
The P -value is the probability — if the null hypothesis were true — that we would get an F -statistic larger than 32.7554. Comparing our F -statistic to an F -distribution with 1 numerator degree of freedom and 28 denominator degrees of freedom, Minitab tells us that the probability is close to 1 that we would observe an F -statistic smaller than 32.7554:
F distribution with 1 DF in Numerator and 28 DF in denominator
x | P ( X ≤x ) |
---|---|
32.7554 | 1.00000 |
Therefore, the probability that we would get an F -statistic larger than 32.7554 is close to 0. That is, the P -value is < 0.001. There is sufficient evidence ( F = 32.8, P < 0.001) to conclude that the size of the infarct is significantly related to the size of the area at risk after the other predictors x2 and x3 have been taken into account.
But wait a second! Have you been wondering why we couldn't just use the slope's t -statistic to test that the slope parameter, \(\beta_{1}\), is 0? We can! Notice that the P -value ( P < 0.001) for the t -test ( t * = 5.72):
Coefficients
Term | Coef | SE Coef | T-Value | P-Value | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | -0.135 | 0.104 | -1.29 | 0.206 | |
Area | 0.613 | 0.107 | 5.72 | 0.000 | 1.14 |
X2 | -0.2435 | 0.0623 | -3.91 | 0.001 | 1.44 |
X3 | -0.0657 | 0.0651 | -1.01 | 0.322 | 1.57 |
is the same as the P -value we obtained for the F -test. This will always be the case when we test that only one slope parameter is 0. That's because of the well-known relationship between a t -statistic and an F -statistic that has one numerator degree of freedom:
\(t_{(n-p)}^{2}=F_{(1, n-p)}\)
For our example, the square of the t -statistic, 5.72, equals our F -statistic (within rounding error). That is:
\(t^{*2}=5.72^2=32.72=F^*\)
So what have we learned in all of this discussion about the equivalence of the F -test and the t -test? In short:
Compare the output obtained when \(x_{1}\) = Area is entered into the model last :
Term | Coef | SE Coef | T-Value | P-Value | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | -0.135 | 0.104 | -1.29 | 0.206 | |
X2 | -0.2435 | 0.0623 | -3.91 | 0.001 | 1.44 |
X3 | -0.0657 | 0.0651 | -1.01 | 0.322 | 1.57 |
Area | 0.613 | 0.107 | 5.72 | 0.000 | 1.14 |
Inf = - 0.135 - 0.2435 X2 - 0.0657 X3 + 0.613 Area
to the output obtained when \(x_{1}\) = Area is entered into the model first :
The t -statistic and P -value are the same regardless of the order in which \(x_{1}\) = Area is entered into the model. That's because — by its equivalence to the F -test — the t -test for one slope parameter adjusts for all of the other predictors included in the model.
- We can use either the F -test or the t -test to test that only one slope parameter is 0. Because the t -test results can be read right off of the Minitab output, it makes sense that it would be the test that we'll use most often.
- But, we have to be careful with our interpretations! The equivalence of the t -test to the F -test has taught us something new about the t -test. The t -test is a test for the marginal significance of the \(x_{1}\) predictor after the other predictors \(x_{2}\) and \(x_{3}\) have been taken into account. It does not test for the significance of the relationship between the response y and the predictor \(x_{1}\) alone.
Testing a subset of slope parameters is 0 Section
Finally, let's answer the third — and primary — research question: "Is the size of the infarct area significantly (linearly) related to the type of treatment upon controlling for the size of the region at risk for infarction?" To do so, we test the hypotheses:
- \(H_{0} \colon \beta_{2} = \beta_{3} = 0 \)
- \(H_{A} \colon\) At least one \(\beta_{j} \ne 0 \) (for j = 2, 3)
Because the null hypothesis sets the second and third slope parameters, \(\beta_{2}\) and \(\beta_{3}\), equal to 0, the reduced model is:
\(y_i=(\beta_0+\beta_1x_{i1})+\epsilon_i\)
The ANOVA table for the reduced model is:
Source | DF | Adj SS | Adj MS | F- Value | P-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regression | 1 | 0.6249 | 0.62492 | 21.32 | 0.000 |
Area | 1 | 0.6249 | 0.62492 | 21.32 | 0.000 |
Error | 30 | 0.8793 | 0.02931 | ||
31 | 1.5042 |
Because the only predictor in the model is \(x_{1}\), we denote the error sum of squares as SSE (\(x_{1}\)) = 0.8793. Because there are 2 parameters in the model, the number of error degrees of freedom associated with the reduced model is \(df_{R} = n - 2 = 32 – 2 = 30\).
\begin{align} F^*&=\dfrac{SSE(R)-SSE(F)}{df_R-df_F} \div\dfrac{SSE(F)}{df_F}\\&=\dfrac{0.8793-0.54491}{30-28} \div\dfrac{0.54491}{28}\\&= \dfrac{0.33439}{2} \div 0.01946\\&=8.59.\end{align}
Alternatively, we can calculate the F-statistic using a partial F-test :
\begin{align}F^*&=\dfrac{SSR(x_2, x_3|x_1)}{2}\div \dfrac{SSE(x_1,x_2, x_3)}{n-4}\\&=\dfrac{MSR(x_2, x_3|x_1)}{MSE(x_1,x_2, x_3)}.\end{align}
To conduct the test, we regress y = InfSize on \(x_{1}\) = Area and \(x_{2}\) and \(x_{3 }\)— in order (and with "Sequential sums of squares" selected under "Options"):
Source | DF | Seq SS | Seq MS | F- Value | P-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regression | 3 | 0.95927 | 0.31976 | 16.43 | 0.000 |
Area | 1 | 0.62492 | 0.63492 | 32.11 | 0.000 |
X2 | 1 | 0.3143 | 0.31453 | 16.16 | 0.001 |
X3 | 1 | 0.01981 | 0.01981 | 1.02 | 0.322 |
Error | 28 | 0.54491 | 0.01946 | ||
31 | 1.50418 |
Inf = - 0.135 + 0.613 Area - 0.2435 X2 - 0.0657 X3
yielding SSR (\(x_{2}\) | \(x_{1}\)) = 0.31453, SSR (\(x_{3}\) | \(x_{1}\), \(x_{2}\)) = 0.01981, and MSE = 0.54491/28 = 0.01946. Therefore, the value of the partial F -statistic is:
\begin{align} F^*&=\dfrac{SSR(x_2, x_3|x_1)}{2}\div \dfrac{SSE(x_1,x_2, x_3)}{n-4}\\&=\dfrac{0.31453+0.01981}{2}\div\dfrac{0.54491}{28}\\&= \dfrac{0.33434}{2} \div 0.01946\\&=8.59,\end{align}
which is identical (within round-off error) to the general F-statistic above. The P -value is the probability — if the null hypothesis were true — that we would observe a partial F -statistic more extreme than 8.59. The following Minitab output:
F distribution with 2 DF in Numerator and 28 DF in denominator
x | P ( X ≤ x ) |
---|---|
8.59 | 0.998767 |
tells us that the probability of observing such an F -statistic that is smaller than 8.59 is 0.9988. Therefore, the probability of observing such an F -statistic that is larger than 8.59 is 1 - 0.9988 = 0.0012. The P -value is very small. There is sufficient evidence ( F = 8.59, P = 0.0012) to conclude that the type of cooling is significantly related to the extent of damage that occurs — after taking into account the size of the region at risk.
Summary of MLR Testing Section
For the simple linear regression model, there is only one slope parameter about which one can perform hypothesis tests. For the multiple linear regression model, there are three different hypothesis tests for slopes that one could conduct. They are:
- Hypothesis test for testing that all of the slope parameters are 0.
- Hypothesis test for testing that a subset — more than one, but not all — of the slope parameters are 0.
- Hypothesis test for testing that one slope parameter is 0.
We have learned how to perform each of the above three hypothesis tests. Along the way, we also took two detours — one to learn about the " general linear F-test " and one to learn about " sequential sums of squares. " As you now know, knowledge about both is necessary for performing the three hypothesis tests.
The F -statistic and associated p -value in the ANOVA table is used for testing whether all of the slope parameters are 0. In most applications, this p -value will be small enough to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that at least one predictor is useful in the model. For example, for the rabbit heart attacks study, the F -statistic is (0.95927/(4–1)) / (0.54491/(32–4)) = 16.43 with p -value 0.000.
To test whether a subset — more than one, but not all — of the slope parameters are 0, there are two equivalent ways to calculate the F-statistic:
- Use the general linear F-test formula by fitting the full model to find SSE(F) and fitting the reduced model to find SSE(R) . Then the numerator of the F-statistic is (SSE(R) – SSE(F)) / ( \(df_{R}\) – \(df_{F}\)) .
- Alternatively, use the partial F-test formula by fitting only the full model but making sure the relevant predictors are fitted last and "sequential sums of squares" have been selected. Then the numerator of the F-statistic is the sum of the relevant sequential sums of squares divided by the sum of the degrees of freedom for these sequential sums of squares. The denominator of the F -statistic is the mean squared error in the ANOVA table.
For example, for the rabbit heart attacks study, the general linear F-statistic is ((0.8793 – 0.54491) / (30 – 28)) / (0.54491 / 28) = 8.59 with p -value 0.0012. Alternatively, the partial F -statistic for testing the slope parameters for predictors \(x_{2}\) and \(x_{3}\) using sequential sums of squares is ((0.31453 + 0.01981) / 2) / (0.54491 / 28) = 8.59.
To test whether one slope parameter is 0, we can use an F -test as just described. Alternatively, we can use a t -test, which will have an identical p -value since in this case, the square of the t -statistic is equal to the F -statistic. For example, for the rabbit heart attacks study, the F -statistic for testing the slope parameter for the Area predictor is (0.63742/1) / (0.54491/(32–4)) = 32.75 with p -value 0.000. Alternatively, the t -statistic for testing the slope parameter for the Area predictor is 0.613 / 0.107 = 5.72 with p -value 0.000, and \(5.72^{2} = 32.72\).
Incidentally, you may be wondering why we can't just do a series of individual t-tests to test whether a subset of the slope parameters is 0. For example, for the rabbit heart attacks study, we could have done the following:
- Fit the model of y = InfSize on \(x_{1}\) = Area and \(x_{2}\) and \(x_{3}\) and use an individual t-test for \(x_{3}\).
- If the test results indicate that we can drop \(x_{3}\) then fit the model of y = InfSize on \(x_{1}\) = Area and \(x_{2}\) and use an individual t-test for \(x_{2}\).
The problem with this approach is we're using two individual t-tests instead of one F-test, which means our chance of drawing an incorrect conclusion in our testing procedure is higher. Every time we do a hypothesis test, we can draw an incorrect conclusion by:
- rejecting a true null hypothesis, i.e., make a type I error by concluding the tested predictor(s) should be retained in the model when in truth it/they should be dropped; or
- failing to reject a false null hypothesis, i.e., make a type II error by concluding the tested predictor(s) should be dropped from the model when in truth it/they should be retained.
Thus, in general, the fewer tests we perform the better. In this case, this means that wherever possible using one F-test in place of multiple individual t-tests is preferable.
Hypothesis tests for the slope parameters Section
The problems in this section are designed to review the hypothesis tests for the slope parameters, as well as to give you some practice on models with a three-group qualitative variable (which we'll cover in more detail in Lesson 8). We consider tests for:
- whether one slope parameter is 0 (for example, \(H_{0} \colon \beta_{1} = 0 \))
- whether a subset (more than one but less than all) of the slope parameters are 0 (for example, \(H_{0} \colon \beta_{2} = \beta_{3} = 0 \) against the alternative \(H_{A} \colon \beta_{2} \ne 0 \) or \(\beta_{3} \ne 0 \) or both ≠ 0)
- whether all of the slope parameters are 0 (for example, \(H_{0} \colon \beta_{1} = \beta_{2} = \beta_{3}\) = 0 against the alternative \(H_{A} \colon \) at least one of the \(\beta_{i}\) is not 0)
(Note the correct specification of the alternative hypotheses for the last two situations.)
Sugar beets study
A group of researchers was interested in studying the effects of three different growth regulators ( treat , denoted 1, 2, and 3) on the yield of sugar beets (y = yield , in pounds). They planned to plant the beets in 30 different plots and then randomly treat 10 plots with the first growth regulator, 10 plots with the second growth regulator, and 10 plots with the third growth regulator. One problem, though, is that the amount of available nitrogen in the 30 different plots varies naturally, thereby giving a potentially unfair advantage to plots with higher levels of available nitrogen. Therefore, the researchers also measured and recorded the available nitrogen (\(x_{1}\) = nit , in pounds/acre) in each plot. They are interested in comparing the mean yields of sugar beets subjected to the different growth regulators after taking into account the available nitrogen. The Sugar Beets dataset contains the data from the researcher's experiment.
Preliminary Work
The plot shows a similar positive linear trend within each treatment category, which suggests that it is reasonable to formulate a multiple regression model that would place three parallel lines through the data.
Because the qualitative variable treat distinguishes between the three treatment groups (1, 2, and 3), we need to create two indicator variables, \(x_{2}\) and \(x_{3}\), say, to fit a linear regression model to these data. The new indicator variables should be defined as follows:
treat | \(x_2\) | \(x_3\) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0 |
2 | 0 | 1 |
3 | 0 | 0 |
Use Minitab's Calc >> Make Indicator Variables command to create the new indicator variables in your worksheet
Minitab creates an indicator variable for each treatment group but we can only use two, for treatment groups 1 and 2 in this case (treatment group 3 is the reference level in this case).
Then, if we assume the trend in the data can be summarized by this regression model:
\(y_{i} = \beta_{0}\) + \(\beta_{1}\)\(x_{1}\) + \(\beta_{2}\)\(x_{2}\) + \(\beta_{3}\)\(x_{3}\) + \(\epsilon_{i}\)
where \(x_{1}\) = nit and \(x_{2}\) and \(x_{3}\) are defined as above, what is the mean response function for plots receiving treatment 3? for plots receiving treatment 1? for plots receiving treatment 2? Are the three regression lines that arise from our formulated model parallel? What does the parameter \(\beta_{2}\) quantify? And, what does the parameter \(\beta_{3}\) quantify?
The fitted equation from Minitab is Yield = 84.99 + 1.3088 Nit - 2.43 \(x_{2}\) - 2.35 \(x_{3}\), which means that the equations for each treatment group are:
- Group 1: Yield = 84.99 + 1.3088 Nit - 2.43(1) = 82.56 + 1.3088 Nit
- Group 2: Yield = 84.99 + 1.3088 Nit - 2.35(1) = 82.64 + 1.3088 Nit
- Group 3: Yield = 84.99 + 1.3088 Nit
The three estimated regression lines are parallel since they have the same slope, 1.3088.
The regression parameter for \(x_{2}\) represents the difference between the estimated intercept for treatment 1 and the estimated intercept for reference treatment 3.
The regression parameter for \(x_{3}\) represents the difference between the estimated intercept for treatment 2 and the estimated intercept for reference treatment 3.
Testing whether all of the slope parameters are 0
\(H_0 \colon \beta_1 = \beta_2 = \beta_3 = 0\) against the alternative \(H_A \colon \) at least one of the \(\beta_i\) is not 0.
\(F=\dfrac{SSR(X_1,X_2,X_3)\div3}{SSE(X_1,X_2,X_3)\div(n-4)}=\dfrac{MSR(X_1,X_2,X_3)}{MSE(X_1,X_2,X_3)}\)
\(F = \dfrac{\frac{16039.5}{3}}{\frac{1078.0}{30-4}} = \dfrac{5346.5}{41.46} = 128.95\)
Since the p -value for this F -statistic is reported as 0.000, we reject \(H_{0}\) in favor of \(H_{A}\) and conclude that at least one of the slope parameters is not zero, i.e., the regression model containing at least one predictor is useful in predicting the size of sugar beet yield.
Tests for whether one slope parameter is 0
\(H_0 \colon \beta_1= 0\) against the alternative \(H_A \colon \beta_1 \ne 0\)
t -statistic = 19.60, p -value = 0.000, so we reject \(H_{0}\) in favor of \(H_{A}\) and conclude that the slope parameter for \(x_{1}\) = nit is not zero, i.e., sugar beet yield is significantly linearly related to the available nitrogen (controlling for treatment).
\(F=\dfrac{SSR(X_1|X_2,X_3)\div1}{SSE(X_1,X_2,X_3)\div(n-4)}=\dfrac{MSR(X_1|X_2,X_3)}{MSE(X_1,X_2,X_3)}\)
Use the Minitab output to calculate the value of this F statistic. Does the value you obtain equal \(t^{2}\), the square of the t -statistic as we might expect?
\(F-statistic= \dfrac{\frac{15934.5}{1}}{\frac{1078.0}{30-4}} = \dfrac{15934.5}{41.46} = 384.32\), which is the same as \(19.60^{2}\).
Because \(t^{2}\) will equal the partial F -statistic whenever you test for whether one slope parameter is 0, it makes sense to just use the t -statistic and P -value that Minitab displays as a default. But, note that we've just learned something new about the meaning of the t -test in the multiple regression setting. It tests for the ("marginal") significance of the \(x_{1}\) predictor after \(x_{2}\) and \(x_{3}\) have already been taken into account.
Tests for whether a subset of the slope parameters is 0
\(H_0 \colon \beta_2=\beta_3= 0\) against the alternative \(H_A \colon \beta_2 \ne 0\) or \(\beta_3 \ne 0\) or both \(\ne 0\).
\(F=\dfrac{SSR(X_2,X_3|X_1)\div2}{SSE(X_1,X_2,X_3)\div(n-4)}=\dfrac{MSR(X_2,X_3|X_1)}{MSE(X_1,X_2,X_3)}\)
\(F = \dfrac{\frac{10.4+27.5}{2}}{\frac{1078.0}{30-4}} = \dfrac{18.95}{41.46} = 0.46\).
F distribution with 2 DF in Numerator and 26 DF in denominator
x | P ( X ≤ x ) |
---|---|
0.46 | 0.363677 |
p-value \(= 1-0.363677 = 0.636\), so we fail to reject \(H_{0}\) in favor of \(H_{A}\) and conclude that we cannot rule out \(\beta_2 = \beta_3 = 0\), i.e., there is no significant difference in the mean yields of sugar beets subjected to the different growth regulators after taking into account the available nitrogen.
Note that the sequential mean square due to regression, MSR(\(X_{2}\),\(X_{3}\)|\(X_{1}\)), is obtained by dividing the sequential sum of square by its degrees of freedom (2, in this case, since two additional predictors \(X_{2}\) and \(X_{3}\) are considered). Use the Minitab output to calculate the value of this F statistic, and use Minitab to get the associated P -value. Answer the researcher's question at the \(\alpha= 0.05\) level.
Teach yourself statistics
Hypothesis Test for Regression Slope
This lesson describes how to conduct a hypothesis test to determine whether there is a significant linear relationship between an independent variable X and a dependent variable Y .
The test focuses on the slope of the regression line
Y = Β 0 + Β 1 X
where Β 0 is a constant, Β 1 is the slope (also called the regression coefficient), X is the value of the independent variable, and Y is the value of the dependent variable.
If we find that the slope of the regression line is significantly different from zero, we will conclude that there is a significant relationship between the independent and dependent variables.
Test Requirements
The approach described in this lesson is valid whenever the standard requirements for simple linear regression are met.
- The dependent variable Y has a linear relationship to the independent variable X .
- For each value of X, the probability distribution of Y has the same standard deviation σ.
- The Y values are independent.
- The Y values are roughly normally distributed (i.e., symmetric and unimodal ). A little skewness is ok if the sample size is large.
The test procedure consists of four steps: (1) state the hypotheses, (2) formulate an analysis plan, (3) analyze sample data, and (4) interpret results.
State the Hypotheses
If there is a significant linear relationship between the independent variable X and the dependent variable Y , the slope will not equal zero.
H o : Β 1 = 0
H a : Β 1 ≠ 0
The null hypothesis states that the slope is equal to zero, and the alternative hypothesis states that the slope is not equal to zero.
Formulate an Analysis Plan
The analysis plan describes how to use sample data to accept or reject the null hypothesis. The plan should specify the following elements.
- Significance level. Often, researchers choose significance levels equal to 0.01, 0.05, or 0.10; but any value between 0 and 1 can be used.
- Test method. Use a linear regression t-test (described in the next section) to determine whether the slope of the regression line differs significantly from zero.
Analyze Sample Data
Using sample data, find the standard error of the slope, the slope of the regression line, the degrees of freedom, the test statistic, and the P-value associated with the test statistic. The approach described in this section is illustrated in the sample problem at the end of this lesson.
Predictor | Coef | SE Coef | T | P |
Constant | 76 | 30 | 2.53 | 0.01 |
X | 35 | 20 | 1.75 | 0.04 |
SE = s b 1 = sqrt [ Σ(y i - ŷ i ) 2 / (n - 2) ] / sqrt [ Σ(x i - x ) 2 ]
- Slope. Like the standard error, the slope of the regression line will be provided by most statistics software packages. In the hypothetical output above, the slope is equal to 35.
t = b 1 / SE
- P-value. The P-value is the probability of observing a sample statistic as extreme as the test statistic. Since the test statistic is a t statistic, use the t Distribution Calculator to assess the probability associated with the test statistic. Use the degrees of freedom computed above.
Interpret Results
If the sample findings are unlikely, given the null hypothesis, the researcher rejects the null hypothesis. Typically, this involves comparing the P-value to the significance level , and rejecting the null hypothesis when the P-value is less than the significance level.
Test Your Understanding
The local utility company surveys 101 randomly selected customers. For each survey participant, the company collects the following: annual electric bill (in dollars) and home size (in square feet). Output from a regression analysis appears below.
Annual bill = 0.55 * Home size + 15 | ||||
Predictor | Coef | SE Coef | T | P |
Constant | 15 | 3 | 5.0 | 0.00 |
Home size | 0.55 | 0.24 | 2.29 | 0.01 |
Is there a significant linear relationship between annual bill and home size? Use a 0.05 level of significance.
The solution to this problem takes four steps: (1) state the hypotheses, (2) formulate an analysis plan, (3) analyze sample data, and (4) interpret results. We work through those steps below:
H o : The slope of the regression line is equal to zero.
H a : The slope of the regression line is not equal to zero.
- Formulate an analysis plan . For this analysis, the significance level is 0.05. Using sample data, we will conduct a linear regression t-test to determine whether the slope of the regression line differs significantly from zero.
We get the slope (b 1 ) and the standard error (SE) from the regression output.
b 1 = 0.55 SE = 0.24
We compute the degrees of freedom and the t statistic, using the following equations.
DF = n - 2 = 101 - 2 = 99
t = b 1 /SE = 0.55/0.24 = 2.29
where DF is the degrees of freedom, n is the number of observations in the sample, b 1 is the slope of the regression line, and SE is the standard error of the slope.
- Interpret results . Since the P-value (0.0242) is less than the significance level (0.05), we cannot accept the null hypothesis.
- Search Menu
Sign in through your institution
- Browse content in Arts and Humanities
- Browse content in Archaeology
- Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Archaeology
- Archaeological Methodology and Techniques
- Archaeology by Region
- Archaeology of Religion
- Archaeology of Trade and Exchange
- Biblical Archaeology
- Contemporary and Public Archaeology
- Environmental Archaeology
- Historical Archaeology
- History and Theory of Archaeology
- Industrial Archaeology
- Landscape Archaeology
- Mortuary Archaeology
- Prehistoric Archaeology
- Underwater Archaeology
- Zooarchaeology
- Browse content in Architecture
- Architectural Structure and Design
- History of Architecture
- Residential and Domestic Buildings
- Theory of Architecture
- Browse content in Art
- Art Subjects and Themes
- History of Art
- Industrial and Commercial Art
- Theory of Art
- Biographical Studies
- Byzantine Studies
- Browse content in Classical Studies
- Classical Numismatics
- Classical Literature
- Classical Reception
- Classical History
- Classical Philosophy
- Classical Mythology
- Classical Art and Architecture
- Classical Oratory and Rhetoric
- Greek and Roman Papyrology
- Greek and Roman Archaeology
- Greek and Roman Epigraphy
- Greek and Roman Law
- Late Antiquity
- Religion in the Ancient World
- Social History
- Digital Humanities
- Browse content in History
- Colonialism and Imperialism
- Diplomatic History
- Environmental History
- Genealogy, Heraldry, Names, and Honours
- Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing
- Historical Geography
- History by Period
- History of Emotions
- History of Agriculture
- History of Education
- History of Gender and Sexuality
- Industrial History
- Intellectual History
- International History
- Labour History
- Legal and Constitutional History
- Local and Family History
- Maritime History
- Military History
- National Liberation and Post-Colonialism
- Oral History
- Political History
- Public History
- Regional and National History
- Revolutions and Rebellions
- Slavery and Abolition of Slavery
- Social and Cultural History
- Theory, Methods, and Historiography
- Urban History
- World History
- Browse content in Language Teaching and Learning
- Language Learning (Specific Skills)
- Language Teaching Theory and Methods
- Browse content in Linguistics
- Applied Linguistics
- Cognitive Linguistics
- Computational Linguistics
- Forensic Linguistics
- Grammar, Syntax and Morphology
- Historical and Diachronic Linguistics
- History of English
- Language Evolution
- Language Reference
- Language Variation
- Language Families
- Language Acquisition
- Lexicography
- Linguistic Anthropology
- Linguistic Theories
- Linguistic Typology
- Phonetics and Phonology
- Psycholinguistics
- Sociolinguistics
- Translation and Interpretation
- Writing Systems
- Browse content in Literature
- Bibliography
- Children's Literature Studies
- Literary Studies (Romanticism)
- Literary Studies (American)
- Literary Studies (Modernism)
- Literary Studies (Asian)
- Literary Studies (European)
- Literary Studies (Eco-criticism)
- Literary Studies - World
- Literary Studies (1500 to 1800)
- Literary Studies (19th Century)
- Literary Studies (20th Century onwards)
- Literary Studies (African American Literature)
- Literary Studies (British and Irish)
- Literary Studies (Early and Medieval)
- Literary Studies (Fiction, Novelists, and Prose Writers)
- Literary Studies (Gender Studies)
- Literary Studies (Graphic Novels)
- Literary Studies (History of the Book)
- Literary Studies (Plays and Playwrights)
- Literary Studies (Poetry and Poets)
- Literary Studies (Postcolonial Literature)
- Literary Studies (Queer Studies)
- Literary Studies (Science Fiction)
- Literary Studies (Travel Literature)
- Literary Studies (War Literature)
- Literary Studies (Women's Writing)
- Literary Theory and Cultural Studies
- Mythology and Folklore
- Shakespeare Studies and Criticism
- Browse content in Media Studies
- Browse content in Music
- Applied Music
- Dance and Music
- Ethics in Music
- Ethnomusicology
- Gender and Sexuality in Music
- Medicine and Music
- Music Cultures
- Music and Media
- Music and Culture
- Music and Religion
- Music Education and Pedagogy
- Music Theory and Analysis
- Musical Scores, Lyrics, and Libretti
- Musical Structures, Styles, and Techniques
- Musicology and Music History
- Performance Practice and Studies
- Race and Ethnicity in Music
- Sound Studies
- Browse content in Performing Arts
- Browse content in Philosophy
- Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art
- Epistemology
- Feminist Philosophy
- History of Western Philosophy
- Metaphysics
- Moral Philosophy
- Non-Western Philosophy
- Philosophy of Language
- Philosophy of Mind
- Philosophy of Perception
- Philosophy of Action
- Philosophy of Law
- Philosophy of Religion
- Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic
- Practical Ethics
- Social and Political Philosophy
- Browse content in Religion
- Biblical Studies
- Christianity
- East Asian Religions
- History of Religion
- Judaism and Jewish Studies
- Qumran Studies
- Religion and Education
- Religion and Health
- Religion and Politics
- Religion and Science
- Religion and Law
- Religion and Art, Literature, and Music
- Religious Studies
- Browse content in Society and Culture
- Cookery, Food, and Drink
- Cultural Studies
- Customs and Traditions
- Ethical Issues and Debates
- Hobbies, Games, Arts and Crafts
- Natural world, Country Life, and Pets
- Popular Beliefs and Controversial Knowledge
- Sports and Outdoor Recreation
- Technology and Society
- Travel and Holiday
- Visual Culture
- Browse content in Law
- Arbitration
- Browse content in Company and Commercial Law
- Commercial Law
- Company Law
- Browse content in Comparative Law
- Systems of Law
- Competition Law
- Browse content in Constitutional and Administrative Law
- Government Powers
- Judicial Review
- Local Government Law
- Military and Defence Law
- Parliamentary and Legislative Practice
- Construction Law
- Contract Law
- Browse content in Criminal Law
- Criminal Procedure
- Criminal Evidence Law
- Sentencing and Punishment
- Employment and Labour Law
- Environment and Energy Law
- Browse content in Financial Law
- Banking Law
- Insolvency Law
- History of Law
- Human Rights and Immigration
- Intellectual Property Law
- Browse content in International Law
- Private International Law and Conflict of Laws
- Public International Law
- IT and Communications Law
- Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law
- Law and Society
- Law and Politics
- Browse content in Legal System and Practice
- Courts and Procedure
- Legal Skills and Practice
- Legal System - Costs and Funding
- Primary Sources of Law
- Regulation of Legal Profession
- Medical and Healthcare Law
- Browse content in Policing
- Criminal Investigation and Detection
- Police and Security Services
- Police Procedure and Law
- Police Regional Planning
- Browse content in Property Law
- Personal Property Law
- Restitution
- Study and Revision
- Terrorism and National Security Law
- Browse content in Trusts Law
- Wills and Probate or Succession
- Browse content in Medicine and Health
- Browse content in Allied Health Professions
- Arts Therapies
- Clinical Science
- Dietetics and Nutrition
- Occupational Therapy
- Operating Department Practice
- Physiotherapy
- Radiography
- Speech and Language Therapy
- Browse content in Anaesthetics
- General Anaesthesia
- Clinical Neuroscience
- Browse content in Clinical Medicine
- Acute Medicine
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Genetics
- Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- Dermatology
- Endocrinology and Diabetes
- Gastroenterology
- Genito-urinary Medicine
- Geriatric Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Toxicology
- Medical Oncology
- Pain Medicine
- Palliative Medicine
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Respiratory Medicine and Pulmonology
- Rheumatology
- Sleep Medicine
- Sports and Exercise Medicine
- Community Medical Services
- Critical Care
- Emergency Medicine
- Forensic Medicine
- Haematology
- History of Medicine
- Browse content in Medical Skills
- Clinical Skills
- Communication Skills
- Nursing Skills
- Surgical Skills
- Medical Ethics
- Browse content in Medical Dentistry
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Paediatric Dentistry
- Restorative Dentistry and Orthodontics
- Surgical Dentistry
- Medical Statistics and Methodology
- Browse content in Neurology
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Neuropathology
- Nursing Studies
- Browse content in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Gynaecology
- Occupational Medicine
- Ophthalmology
- Otolaryngology (ENT)
- Browse content in Paediatrics
- Neonatology
- Browse content in Pathology
- Chemical Pathology
- Clinical Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics
- Histopathology
- Medical Microbiology and Virology
- Patient Education and Information
- Browse content in Pharmacology
- Psychopharmacology
- Browse content in Popular Health
- Caring for Others
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine
- Self-help and Personal Development
- Browse content in Preclinical Medicine
- Cell Biology
- Molecular Biology and Genetics
- Reproduction, Growth and Development
- Primary Care
- Professional Development in Medicine
- Browse content in Psychiatry
- Addiction Medicine
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
- Forensic Psychiatry
- Learning Disabilities
- Old Age Psychiatry
- Psychotherapy
- Browse content in Public Health and Epidemiology
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
- Browse content in Radiology
- Clinical Radiology
- Interventional Radiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Radiation Oncology
- Reproductive Medicine
- Browse content in Surgery
- Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Gastro-intestinal and Colorectal Surgery
- General Surgery
- Neurosurgery
- Paediatric Surgery
- Peri-operative Care
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Surgical Oncology
- Transplant Surgery
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Browse content in Science and Mathematics
- Browse content in Biological Sciences
- Aquatic Biology
- Biochemistry
- Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology and Conservation
- Evolutionary Biology
- Genetics and Genomics
- Microbiology
- Molecular and Cell Biology
- Natural History
- Plant Sciences and Forestry
- Research Methods in Life Sciences
- Structural Biology
- Systems Biology
- Zoology and Animal Sciences
- Browse content in Chemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
- Computational Chemistry
- Crystallography
- Environmental Chemistry
- Industrial Chemistry
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Materials Chemistry
- Medicinal Chemistry
- Mineralogy and Gems
- Organic Chemistry
- Physical Chemistry
- Polymer Chemistry
- Study and Communication Skills in Chemistry
- Theoretical Chemistry
- Browse content in Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Architecture and Logic Design
- Game Studies
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Mathematical Theory of Computation
- Programming Languages
- Software Engineering
- Systems Analysis and Design
- Virtual Reality
- Browse content in Computing
- Business Applications
- Computer Games
- Computer Security
- Computer Networking and Communications
- Digital Lifestyle
- Graphical and Digital Media Applications
- Operating Systems
- Browse content in Earth Sciences and Geography
- Atmospheric Sciences
- Environmental Geography
- Geology and the Lithosphere
- Maps and Map-making
- Meteorology and Climatology
- Oceanography and Hydrology
- Palaeontology
- Physical Geography and Topography
- Regional Geography
- Soil Science
- Urban Geography
- Browse content in Engineering and Technology
- Agriculture and Farming
- Biological Engineering
- Civil Engineering, Surveying, and Building
- Electronics and Communications Engineering
- Energy Technology
- Engineering (General)
- Environmental Science, Engineering, and Technology
- History of Engineering and Technology
- Mechanical Engineering and Materials
- Technology of Industrial Chemistry
- Transport Technology and Trades
- Browse content in Environmental Science
- Applied Ecology (Environmental Science)
- Conservation of the Environment (Environmental Science)
- Environmental Sustainability
- Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Environmental Science)
- Management of Land and Natural Resources (Environmental Science)
- Natural Disasters (Environmental Science)
- Nuclear Issues (Environmental Science)
- Pollution and Threats to the Environment (Environmental Science)
- Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Environmental Science)
- History of Science and Technology
- Browse content in Materials Science
- Ceramics and Glasses
- Composite Materials
- Metals, Alloying, and Corrosion
- Nanotechnology
- Browse content in Mathematics
- Applied Mathematics
- Biomathematics and Statistics
- History of Mathematics
- Mathematical Education
- Mathematical Finance
- Mathematical Analysis
- Numerical and Computational Mathematics
- Probability and Statistics
- Pure Mathematics
- Browse content in Neuroscience
- Cognition and Behavioural Neuroscience
- Development of the Nervous System
- Disorders of the Nervous System
- History of Neuroscience
- Invertebrate Neurobiology
- Molecular and Cellular Systems
- Neuroendocrinology and Autonomic Nervous System
- Neuroscientific Techniques
- Sensory and Motor Systems
- Browse content in Physics
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
- Biological and Medical Physics
- Classical Mechanics
- Computational Physics
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Electromagnetism, Optics, and Acoustics
- History of Physics
- Mathematical and Statistical Physics
- Measurement Science
- Nuclear Physics
- Particles and Fields
- Plasma Physics
- Quantum Physics
- Relativity and Gravitation
- Semiconductor and Mesoscopic Physics
- Browse content in Psychology
- Affective Sciences
- Clinical Psychology
- Cognitive Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Criminal and Forensic Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Educational Psychology
- Evolutionary Psychology
- Health Psychology
- History and Systems in Psychology
- Music Psychology
- Neuropsychology
- Organizational Psychology
- Psychological Assessment and Testing
- Psychology of Human-Technology Interaction
- Psychology Professional Development and Training
- Research Methods in Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Browse content in Social Sciences
- Browse content in Anthropology
- Anthropology of Religion
- Human Evolution
- Medical Anthropology
- Physical Anthropology
- Regional Anthropology
- Social and Cultural Anthropology
- Theory and Practice of Anthropology
- Browse content in Business and Management
- Business Ethics
- Business History
- Business Strategy
- Business and Technology
- Business and Government
- Business and the Environment
- Comparative Management
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Entrepreneurship
- Health Management
- Human Resource Management
- Industrial and Employment Relations
- Industry Studies
- Information and Communication Technologies
- International Business
- Knowledge Management
- Management and Management Techniques
- Operations Management
- Organizational Theory and Behaviour
- Pensions and Pension Management
- Public and Nonprofit Management
- Social Issues in Business and Management
- Strategic Management
- Supply Chain Management
- Browse content in Criminology and Criminal Justice
- Criminal Justice
- Criminology
- Forms of Crime
- International and Comparative Criminology
- Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
- Development Studies
- Browse content in Economics
- Agricultural, Environmental, and Natural Resource Economics
- Asian Economics
- Behavioural Finance
- Behavioural Economics and Neuroeconomics
- Econometrics and Mathematical Economics
- Economic History
- Economic Methodology
- Economic Systems
- Economic Development and Growth
- Financial Markets
- Financial Institutions and Services
- General Economics and Teaching
- Health, Education, and Welfare
- History of Economic Thought
- International Economics
- Labour and Demographic Economics
- Law and Economics
- Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
- Microeconomics
- Public Economics
- Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
- Welfare Economics
- Browse content in Education
- Adult Education and Continuous Learning
- Care and Counselling of Students
- Early Childhood and Elementary Education
- Educational Equipment and Technology
- Educational Strategies and Policy
- Higher and Further Education
- Organization and Management of Education
- Philosophy and Theory of Education
- Schools Studies
- Secondary Education
- Teaching of a Specific Subject
- Teaching of Specific Groups and Special Educational Needs
- Teaching Skills and Techniques
- Browse content in Environment
- Applied Ecology (Social Science)
- Climate Change
- Conservation of the Environment (Social Science)
- Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Social Science)
- Management of Land and Natural Resources (Social Science)
- Natural Disasters (Environment)
- Pollution and Threats to the Environment (Social Science)
- Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Social Science)
- Sustainability
- Browse content in Human Geography
- Cultural Geography
- Economic Geography
- Political Geography
- Browse content in Interdisciplinary Studies
- Communication Studies
- Museums, Libraries, and Information Sciences
- Browse content in Politics
- African Politics
- Asian Politics
- Chinese Politics
- Comparative Politics
- Conflict Politics
- Elections and Electoral Studies
- Environmental Politics
- Ethnic Politics
- European Union
- Foreign Policy
- Gender and Politics
- Human Rights and Politics
- Indian Politics
- International Relations
- International Organization (Politics)
- Irish Politics
- Latin American Politics
- Middle Eastern Politics
- Political Behaviour
- Political Economy
- Political Institutions
- Political Theory
- Political Methodology
- Political Communication
- Political Philosophy
- Political Sociology
- Politics and Law
- Politics of Development
- Public Policy
- Public Administration
- Qualitative Political Methodology
- Quantitative Political Methodology
- Regional Political Studies
- Russian Politics
- Security Studies
- State and Local Government
- UK Politics
- US Politics
- Browse content in Regional and Area Studies
- African Studies
- Asian Studies
- East Asian Studies
- Japanese Studies
- Latin American Studies
- Middle Eastern Studies
- Native American Studies
- Scottish Studies
- Browse content in Research and Information
- Research Methods
- Browse content in Social Work
- Addictions and Substance Misuse
- Adoption and Fostering
- Care of the Elderly
- Child and Adolescent Social Work
- Couple and Family Social Work
- Direct Practice and Clinical Social Work
- Emergency Services
- Human Behaviour and the Social Environment
- International and Global Issues in Social Work
- Mental and Behavioural Health
- Social Justice and Human Rights
- Social Policy and Advocacy
- Social Work and Crime and Justice
- Social Work Macro Practice
- Social Work Practice Settings
- Social Work Research and Evidence-based Practice
- Welfare and Benefit Systems
- Browse content in Sociology
- Childhood Studies
- Community Development
- Comparative and Historical Sociology
- Disability Studies
- Economic Sociology
- Gender and Sexuality
- Gerontology and Ageing
- Health, Illness, and Medicine
- Marriage and the Family
- Migration Studies
- Occupations, Professions, and Work
- Organizations
- Population and Demography
- Race and Ethnicity
- Social Theory
- Social Movements and Social Change
- Social Research and Statistics
- Social Stratification, Inequality, and Mobility
- Sociology of Religion
- Sociology of Education
- Sport and Leisure
- Urban and Rural Studies
- Browse content in Warfare and Defence
- Defence Strategy, Planning, and Research
- Land Forces and Warfare
- Military Administration
- Military Life and Institutions
- Naval Forces and Warfare
- Other Warfare and Defence Issues
- Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution
- Weapons and Equipment
![hypothesis on regression Time Series and Panel Data Econometrics](https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/content_public/books/43485/book/2/m_9780198736912.jpeg?Expires=1727725329&Signature=fNOgBbwrEUgWXcCwGc1Mmf2Min86r4A06-VVCiUSST7AiN1glcPuB~2k81XIXAcMNfzc7Jqa5ki3veb6ulPFgens6Gg-cYYVTWFqAQjvhisjGI6zmhRtd0ULtMtrOvsyTIcCtQNHlpzmGcQzYjl3BaSeUVeSMChMaBQn1hRCaDRtYo52-5wYRvr1NI-3HYSgL-uIcN2JvhOA6EhdPfue1pYYhDtwv77AECOXeW9WJU5NnbuxrtdL-1sCrAltGCBaAZJ8~hY-umra9g6D420gOVFUBchkFHag~WRPjA8h4C7V-28WREixeKV6ZWmCxwEx8TU5iCV21UmggJNREIzCNg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA)
- < Previous chapter
- Next chapter >
3 Hypothesis Testing in Regression Models
- Published: October 2015
- Cite Icon Cite
- Permissions Icon Permissions
This chapter introduces some key concepts of statistical inference and shows their use to investigate the statistical significance of the (linear) relationships modelled through regression analysis, or to investigate the validity of the classical assumptions in simple and multiple linear regression models. The discussions cover statistical hypothesis testing in simple and multiple regression models; testing linear restrictions on regression coefficients; joint tests of linear restrictions; testing general linear restrictions; the relationship between the F test and the coefficient of multiple correlation; the joint confidence region; multicollinearity and the prediction problem; implications of mis-specification of the regression model on hypothesis testing; Jarque-Bera's test of the normality of regression residuals; the predictive failure test; the Chow test; and non-parametric estimation of the density function. Exercises are provided at the end of the chapter.
Personal account
- Sign in with email/username & password
- Get email alerts
- Save searches
- Purchase content
- Activate your purchase/trial code
- Add your ORCID iD
Institutional access
Sign in with a library card.
- Sign in with username/password
- Recommend to your librarian
- Institutional account management
- Get help with access
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
IP based access
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
- Click Sign in through your institution.
- Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
- When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
- Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society Members
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Sign in through society site
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
- Click Sign in through society site.
- When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Sign in using a personal account
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Viewing your signed in accounts
Click the account icon in the top right to:
- View your signed in personal account and access account management features.
- View the institutional accounts that are providing access.
Signed in but can't access content
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.
Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
October 2022 | 13 |
November 2022 | 18 |
December 2022 | 7 |
January 2023 | 12 |
February 2023 | 5 |
March 2023 | 7 |
April 2023 | 3 |
May 2023 | 3 |
June 2023 | 6 |
July 2023 | 3 |
August 2023 | 4 |
September 2023 | 4 |
October 2023 | 9 |
November 2023 | 13 |
December 2023 | 6 |
January 2024 | 10 |
February 2024 | 8 |
March 2024 | 4 |
April 2024 | 3 |
May 2024 | 4 |
June 2024 | 5 |
- About Oxford Academic
- Publish journals with us
- University press partners
- What we publish
- New features
- Open access
- Rights and permissions
- Accessibility
- Advertising
- Media enquiries
- Oxford University Press
- Oxford Languages
- University of Oxford
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide
- Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
- Cookie settings
- Cookie policy
- Privacy policy
- Legal notice
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
- Remember the regression equation for predicting y from x is: y = bx + a (a is also indicated as "e" at times)
b , or the slope, is simply (r xy * S.D. y )/S.D. x a , or the intercept, is simply the value of y when x is 0:
[Why?: the point, a, where the line crosses the Y axis for X being 0 is the distance from the mean of Y predicted for the X value of 0: Remember: D y = b * D x a = D y + mean of y so:
] Example: Let's say we knew that the average UCLA student experiences a moderate level of anxiety on a 100 point scale, = 36.8, S.D. = 12.2. Also, that students average a course load of about 13 or so units, = 13.4, S.D. = 3.7. And finally, that the correlation between units taken and anxiety levels is a stunning r = .4. You might ask as you plan your schedule for next quarter, how much anxiety can I expect to experience if I take 20 units? Treat units as x and anxiety as y. Then The slope of the line predicting anxiety from units taken is (.4 * 12.2)/3.7 = (4.88)/3.7 = 1.32 The intercept is 36.8 - 1.32*13.4 = 36.8 - 17.67 = 19.13 So the predicted anxiety score when taking 20 units is: y (or anxiety) = 1.32 * (20 units) + 19.13 = 45.53
- The method of least squares
The r.m.s. error for the regression line of y on x is:
The regression equation is the equation for the line that produces the least r.m.s. error or standard error of the estimate If x and y are perfectly related, that is all points lie on the regression line, the standard error of estimate is zero (the square root of 1 - 1 2 = 0), there is no deviation from the line. If x and y are not associated at all, the standard error of the estimate is the S.D. of y (the square root of 1 - 0 2 = 1) and slope is 0. So the regression line is simply a line parallel to the x axis that intercepts y at the mean of y.
- Interpretation
Regression is appropriate when the relationship between two variables is linear Although we commonly think of x as causing y, this is dependent upon the research design and logic GIGO--garbage in-garbage out--you can always create regression lines predicting one variable from another. The math is the same whether or not the analysis is appropriate
Example: Calculate a regression line predicting height of the surf at Venice beach from the number of floors in the math building.
- So far we have learned how to take raw data, combine it, and create statistics that allow us to describe the data in a brief summary form.
We have used statistics to describe our samples. These are called descriptive statistics. We have used our statistics to say something about the population that our samples were drawn from--this is inferential statistics. Now we are going to learn another way in which statistics can be use inferentially--hypothesis testing
- At the beginning of this course, we said that an important aspect of doing research is to specify our research question
The first step in conducting research is to translate our inclinations, hunches, suspicions, beliefs into a precise question.
Example: Is this drug effective?, Does lowering the interest rate cause inflation?
The second step is to look closely at the question we have asked and assure ourselves that we know what an answer to the question would look like
Example: Is this drug effective? Do we know exactly what drug we are referring to, how big a dose, given to whom? Can we define what we mean by effective? Do we mean effective for everyone? Is it a cure? What about side effects?
Now, we are going to add one more layer to this--the third step is to translate our question into a hypothesis that we can test by using statistical methods.
Example: Is this drug effective? Does it reduce symptoms? Do people report higher average pain before they take the drug than after they have taken it for a while? Statistically, what we are saying is, perhaps, that the mean pain at time 1 is greater than the mean pain at time 2. But how much greater does it have to be?
- Remember every observation is potentially made up of three components: true or expected score + bias + chance error. Things vary from being exactly the same every time we measure them for one of three possible reasons:
The true score could in fact be different from what we expect There is bias Random variation or chance
- Generally, we are interested in only whether or not the true score is different. We design our studies to minimize bias as much as possible. But no matter what we do there is always random variation
This means that whenever we evaluate a change or difference between two things, we have, even with a perfect design eliminating bias, two possible causes. This is like try a solve a problem with two unknowns. If I tell you x + y = 5, you cannot tell me what x is or what y is. There are two strategies to solving this dilemma Set one of the unknowns to a value, such as 0 by use of logic Get two estimates for one of the unknowns from two different sources and divide one by the other. On average this should equal 1. Combine these two strategies
- Statistical tests use these approaches to try to evaluate how much of the difference between two things can be attributed to a difference in the true score.
- Now for the mind twist
To evaluate a research question, we translate the question into logical alternatives One is a mathematical statement that says there is no difference. Or essentially, all the difference that we observe is due to chance alone. This is called the null hypothesis . Null meaning nothing. And the hypothesis is that nothing is there in our data, no differences from what we expect except chance variation or chance error. Example: Does this drug reduce pain? The null hypothesis is that any change in mean levels of pain from time 1 to time 2 is simply random (explained by chance error) and the true score does not vary from time 1 to time 2. Or mathematically the truth is: 1 = 2 , in the population
- Because the hypothesis does not refer to what we observe in our sample, but rather what is true in the population, the null hypothesis is typically written:
H 0 : m 1 = [some value such as 0, or any number we expect the true score to be]
There are two other possible alternatives. That pain is in fact reduced at time 2
Or mathematically: 1 < 2 in the population
That pain is in fact increased at time 2
Or mathematically: 1 > 2 in the population
Each one of these is referred to as a tail (for reasons we'll find out later). If we only predict that time 2 pain will be less that time 1 pain, then our alternative hypothesis (which is our research hypothesis) is considered one-tailed With one-tailed hypotheses, the other tail is simply added to the original null hypothesis, for the following statement: 1 � 2 If either possibility is consistent with our research hypothesis, then our statistical hypothesis that restates the research hypothesis is two-tailed or: 1 � 2
- Again, our hypothesis refers to what is true in the population and so is formally written:
H 1 : m 1 � [the same value as we specified above for our null hypothesis]
Notice that if we combine the two hypotheses we have logically included all possibilities (they are mutually exclusive and exhaustive ) So if one is absolutely correct, the other must be false If one is highly unlikely to be true, the other just might possibly be true If one is perhaps correct, we have not really reduced our uncertainty at all about the other.
- Because of the problems of too many unknowns, we end up only being able to evaluate the possible truth about the null hypothesis. We're not interested in the null hypothesis. But because it is related by logic to the alternative hypothesis which is a statistical restatement of our research hypothesis, if we can conclude something definitive about the null hypothesis, then we can make a judgment about the possibility of the alternative being true.
Save 10% on All AnalystPrep 2024 Study Packages with Coupon Code BLOG10 .
- Payment Plans
- Product List
- Partnerships
![hypothesis on regression AnalystPrep](https://analystprep.com/cfa-level-1-exam/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/prep-final-min.png)
- Try Free Trial
- Study Packages
- Levels I, II & III Lifetime Package
- Video Lessons
- Study Notes
- Practice Questions
- Levels II & III Lifetime Package
- About the Exam
- About your Instructor
- Part I Study Packages
- Part I & Part II Lifetime Package
- Part II Study Packages
- Exams P & FM Lifetime Package
- Quantitative Questions
- Verbal Questions
- Data Insight Questions
- Live Tutoring
- About your Instructors
- EA Practice Questions
- Data Sufficiency Questions
- Integrated Reasoning Questions
![hypothesis on regression Hypothesis Testing in Regression Analysis](https://cdn.analystprep.com/cfa-level-1-exam/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/08091332/cfa-blog-banner-default.jpg)
Hypothesis Testing in Regression Analysis
Hypothesis testing is used to confirm if the estimated regression coefficients bear any statistical significance. Either the confidence interval approach or the t-test approach can be used in hypothesis testing. In this section, we will explore the t-test approach.
The t-test Approach
The following are the steps followed in the performance of the t-test:
- Set the significance level for the test.
- Formulate the null and the alternative hypotheses.
$$t=\frac{\widehat{b_1}-b_1}{s_{\widehat{b_1}}}$$
\(b_1\) = True slope coefficient.
\(\widehat{b_1}\) = Point estimate for \(b_1\)
\(b_1 s_{\widehat{b_1\ }}\) = Standard error of the regression coefficient.
- Compare the absolute value of the t-statistic to the critical t-value (t_c). Reject the null hypothesis if the absolute value of the t-statistic is greater than the critical t-value i.e., \(t\ >\ +\ t_{critical}\ or\ t\ <\ –t_{\text{critical}}\).
Example: Hypothesis Testing of the Significance of Regression Coefficients
An analyst generates the following output from the regression analysis of inflation on unemployment:
$$\small{\begin{array}{llll}\hline{}& \textbf{Regression Statistics} &{}&{}\\ \hline{}& \text{Multiple R} & 0.8766 &{} \\ {}& \text{R Square} & 0.7684 &{} \\ {}& \text{Adjusted R Square} & 0.7394 & {}\\ {}& \text{Standard Error} & 0.0063 &{}\\ {}& \text{Observations} & 10 &{}\\ \hline {}& & & \\ \hline{} & \textbf{Coefficients} & \textbf{Standard Error} & \textbf{t-Stat}\\ \hline \text{Intercept} & 0.0710 & 0.0094 & 7.5160 \\\text{Forecast (Slope)} & -0.9041 & 0.1755 & -5.1516\\ \hline\end{array}}$$
At the 5% significant level, test the null hypothesis that the slope coefficient is significantly different from one, that is,
$$ H_{0}: b_{1} = 1\ vs. \ H_{a}: b_{1}≠1 $$
The calculated t-statistic, \(\text{t}=\frac{\widehat{b_{1}}-b_1}{\widehat{S_{b_{1}}}}\) is equal to:
$$\begin{align*}\text{t}& = \frac{-0.9041-1}{0.1755}\\& = -10.85\end{align*}$$
The critical two-tail t-values from the table with \(n-2=8\) degrees of freedom are:
$$\text{t}_{c}=±2.306$$
![hypothesis on regression](https://analystprep.com/study-notes/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/cfa-level-2-t-table-2.3.png)
Notice that \(|t|>t_{c}\) i.e., (\(10.85>2.306\))
Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the estimated slope coefficient is statistically different from one.
Note that we used the confidence interval approach and arrived at the same conclusion.
Question Neeth Shinu, CFA, is forecasting price elasticity of supply for a certain product. Shinu uses the quantity of the product supplied for the past 5months as the dependent variable and the price per unit of the product as the independent variable. The regression results are shown below. $$\small{\begin{array}{lccccc}\hline \textbf{Regression Statistics} & & & & & \\ \hline \text{Multiple R} & 0.9971 & {}& {}&{}\\ \text{R Square} & 0.9941 & & & \\ \text{Adjusted R Square} & 0.9922 & & & & \\ \text{Standard Error} & 3.6515 & & & \\ \text{Observations} & 5 & & & \\ \hline {}& \textbf{Coefficients} & \textbf{Standard Error} & \textbf{t Stat} & \textbf{P-value}\\ \hline\text{Intercept} & -159 & 10.520 & (15.114) & 0.001\\ \text{Slope} & 0.26 & 0.012 & 22.517 & 0.000\\ \hline\end{array}}$$ Which of the following most likely reports the correct value of the t-statistic for the slope and most accurately evaluates its statistical significance with 95% confidence? A. \(t=21.67\); slope is significantly different from zero. B. \(t= 3.18\); slope is significantly different from zero. C. \(t=22.57\); slope is not significantly different from zero. Solution The correct answer is A . The t-statistic is calculated using the formula: $$\text{t}=\frac{\widehat{b_{1}}-b_1}{\widehat{S_{b_{1}}}}$$ Where: \(b_{1}\) = True slope coefficient \(\widehat{b_{1}}\) = Point estimator for \(b_{1}\) \(\widehat{S_{b_{1}}}\) = Standard error of the regression coefficient $$\begin{align*}\text{t}&=\frac{0.26-0}{0.012}\\&=21.67\end{align*}$$ The critical two-tail t-values from the t-table with \(n-2 = 3\) degrees of freedom are: $$t_{c}=±3.18$$ Notice that \(|t|>t_{c}\) (i.e \(21.67>3.18\)). Therefore, the null hypothesis can be rejected. Further, we can conclude that the estimated slope coefficient is statistically different from zero.
Offered by AnalystPrep
![hypothesis on regression hypothesis on regression](https://analystprep.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/cfa-video-lessons.webp)
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Predicted value of a dependent variable, common chart patterns.
A chart pattern is a distinct trading formation appearing repeatedly and which can... Read More
Kurtosis refers to the measurement of the degree to which a given distribution... Read More
Dependent and Independent Events
Two or more events are independent if the occurrence of one event does... Read More
Calculating Unconditional Probability ...
We can use the total probability rule to determine the unconditional probability of... Read More
![](http://nandemo.space/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
COMMENTS
The hypotheses are: Find the critical value using dfE = n − p − 1 = 13 for a two-tailed test α = 0.05 inverse t-distribution to get the critical values ±2.160. Draw the sampling distribution and label the critical values, as shown in Figure 12-14. Figure 12-14: Graph of t-distribution with labeled critical values.
x: The value of the predictor variable. Simple linear regression uses the following null and alternative hypotheses: H0: β1 = 0. HA: β1 ≠ 0. The null hypothesis states that the coefficient β1 is equal to zero. In other words, there is no statistically significant relationship between the predictor variable, x, and the response variable, y.
In simple linear regression, this is equivalent to saying "Are X an Y correlated?". In reviewing the model, Y = β0 +β1X + ε Y = β 0 + β 1 X + ε, as long as the slope ( β1 β 1) has any non‐zero value, X X will add value in helping predict the expected value of Y Y. However, if there is no correlation between X and Y, the value of ...
The hypothesis test for a regression coefficient is a well established process: Write down the null and alternative hypotheses in terms of the regression coefficient being tested. The null hypothesis is the claim that there is no relationship between the dependent variable and independent variable.
c plot.9.2 Statistical hypothesesFor simple linear regression, the chief null hypothesis is H0 : β1 = 0, and the corresponding alter. ative hypothesis is H1 : β1 6= 0. If this null hypothesis is true, then, from E(Y ) = β0 + β1x we can see that the population mean of Y is β0 for every x value, which t.
The lecture is divided in two parts: in the first part, we discuss hypothesis testing in the normal linear regression model, in which the OLS estimator of the coefficients has a normal distribution conditional on the matrix of regressors; in the second part, we show how to carry out hypothesis tests in linear regression analyses where the ...
Simple linear regression example. You are a social researcher interested in the relationship between income and happiness. You survey 500 people whose incomes range from 15k to 75k and ask them to rank their happiness on a scale from 1 to 10. Your independent variable (income) and dependent variable (happiness) are both quantitative, so you can ...
15.5: Hypothesis Tests for Regression Models. So far we've talked about what a regression model is, how the coefficients of a regression model are estimated, and how we quantify the performance of the model (the last of these, incidentally, is basically our measure of effect size). The next thing we need to talk about is hypothesis tests.
know this through hypothesis testing as confounders may not test significant but would still be necessary in the regression model). • Adding an unimportant predictor may increase the residual mean square thereby reducing the usefulness of the model.
Steps to Perform Hypothesis testing: Step 1: We start by saying that β₁ is not significant, i.e., there is no relationship between x and y, therefore slope β₁ = 0. Step 2: Typically, we set ...
In relation to machine learning, linear regression is defined as a predictive modeling technique that allows us to build a model which can help predict continuous response variables as a function of a linear combination of explanatory or predictor variables.While training linear regression models, we need to rely on hypothesis testing in relation to determining the relationship between the ...
For the simple linear regression model, there is only one slope parameter about which one can perform hypothesis tests. For the multiple linear regression model, there are three different hypothesis tests for slopes that one could conduct. They are: Hypothesis test for testing that all of the slope parameters are 0.
With a simple calculation, we can find the value of β0 and β1 for minimum RSS value. With the stats model library in python, we can find out the coefficients, Table 1: Simple regression of sales on TV. Values for β0 and β1 are 7.03 and 0.047 respectively. Then the relation becomes, Sales = 7.03 + 0.047 * TV.
Hypothesis Test for Regression Slope. This lesson describes how to conduct a hypothesis test to determine whether there is a significant linear relationship between an independent variable X and a dependent variable Y.. The test focuses on the slope of the regression line Y = Β 0 + Β 1 X. where Β 0 is a constant, Β 1 is the slope (also called the regression coefficient), X is the value of ...
The discussions cover statistical hypothesis testing in simple and multiple regression models; testing linear restrictions on regression coefficients; joint tests of linear restrictions; testing general linear restrictions; the relationship between the F test and the coefficient of multiple correlation; the joint confidence region ...
In statistical modeling, regression analysis is a set of statistical processes for estimating the relationships between a dependent variable (often called the outcome or response variable, or a label in machine learning parlance) and one or more independent variables (often called regressors, predictors, covariates, explanatory variables or features).The most common form of regression analysis ...
REGRESSION CONTINUED. Remember the regression equation for predicting y from x is: y = bx + a (a is also indicated as "e" at times) b, or the slope, is simply (r xy * S.D. y)/S.D. x. ... The null hypothesis is that any change in mean levels of pain from time 1 to time 2 is simply random (explained by chance error) and the true score does not ...
Reject the null hypothesis if the absolute value of the t-statistic is greater than the critical t-value i.e., \(t\ >\ +\ t_{critical}\ or\ t\ <\ -t_{\text{critical}}\). Example: Hypothesis Testing of the Significance of Regression Coefficients. An analyst generates the following output from the regression analysis of inflation on unemployment:
In simple linear regression, this is equivalent to saying "Are X an Y correlated?". In reviewing the model, Y = β0 +β1X + ε Y = β 0 + β 1 X + ε, as long as the slope ( β1 β 1) has any non‐zero value, X X will add value in helping predict the expected value of Y Y. However, if there is no correlation between X and Y, the value of ...
Linear Regression Hypothesis Testing Assumptions Explained. Now that I've shared the function I created for quick linear regression hypothesis testing in Python, I want to give a quick refresher on how to interpret the diagnostic plots and how the diagnostic plots help determine if the linear regression assumptions are satisfied.
Organized by textbook: https://learncheme.com/ The spreadsheet can be found at https://learncheme.com/student-resources/excel-files/ Made by faculty at the ...
11.1: Testing the Hypothesis that β = 0. The correlation coefficient, r r, tells us about the strength and direction of the linear relationship between x x and y y. However, the reliability of the linear model also depends on how many observed data points are in the sample.
The MR tumor regression grade ... Y.H.) using SPSS for Windows, version 25 (IBM). Assuming the null hypothesis that the positive predictive value of MR-TRG for determining pathologic complete response is 80%, one-sided α = 0.05, and (1-β) = 0.8, a total of 22 positive calls were necessary to reject the null hypothesis when the true-positive ...
Using simple OLS regression, we find support for this working hypothesis and can reject the null. This page titled 9.1: Hypothesis Tests for Regression Coefficients is shared under a CC BY 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Jenkins-Smith et al. ( University of Oklahoma Libraries ) via source content that was edited to the ...