assignment of benefits dictionary

• 855-717-0022
• Log In  /  Create an Account

Assignment of benefits

Assignment of benefits is an agreement that gives your claims benefits to someone else.

What is an assignment of benefits?

An assignment of benefits (or AOB for short) is an agreement that gives your claims benefits, and in some instances complete control of your claim, to someone else. It’s usually used so that a contractor can "stand in your shoes" and file a claim, make decisions about repairs, and collect insurance payments from your insurance company directly for covered repairs. In some states, the contractor will even file a lawsuit against your insurer as your assignee.

Why do homeowners agree to an assignment of benefits?

Homeowners may sign an assignment of benefits form because they think it’s more convenient and efficient than dealing with the claims process firsthand.

Once a contractor has been assigned your benefits, they tell the insurance company what work they believe is required and negotiate the claim. For example, say you have a water leak in the house. You call a home restoration company to stop the water flow, clean up the mess, and restore your home to its former glory. The restoration company may ask for an assignment of benefits so it can deal directly with the insurance company without your input. That may sound like a relief at first glance – someone else can deal with all that!

But signing away your rights in the claims process may not be worth the risk.

Assignment of benefits in Florida: a case of rampant fraud

Because the assignment of benefits takes control out of the homeowner’s hands, insurance fraud is a major concern. Some contractors may take advantage of the situation and inflate repair needs and costs or bill for work that was never completed. They may also hire attorneys to sue the insurance company if it does not pay the full amount of their estimate or denies claims.

These lawsuits became a huge problem in Florida – by 2018, there were 135,000 AOB lawsuits , a 70 percent increase in 15 years. On the whole, the FBI estimates fraudulent claims account for nearly $6 billion of the $80 billion appropriated for post-hurricane reconstruction.

Florida eventually passed a bill in 2019 to curb the abuse of the assignment of benefits.

Ultimately, AOB fraud hurts homeowners the most. It increases homeowners insurance rates across the board, and you may be stuck with incomplete work and no recourse.

What responsibilities does the AOB contractor have?

Once you sign an AOB, a contractor has full power to make all decisions about the claim without consulting you. The assignment of benefits gives contractors the ability to:

• File the insurance claim .
• Work directly with insurance claims adjusters.
• Make repair decisions.
• Complete repairs.
• Directly bill the insurance carrier for all work completed.
• Sue your insurance company regarding your claim.

Sometimes the assignment of benefits limits the scope of the work the contractor was hired for. For example, say your home has a leaky pipe. You may hire a plumber to fix the leak, a remediation company to dry the walls and carpet, and a general contractor to replace the bathroom cabinets. Each of the three contractors may have a respective assignment of benefits for their part of the job.

How assignment of benefits impact homeowners

Under some circumstances, an assignment of benefits agreement could work out for homeowners who don’t want to handle their insurance claim. If the contractor is reputable, performs the work, and knows what information the insurance company needs, it can be a big help.

For example:

• The claims adjuster will work directly with the contractor.
• The contractor would handle remediation and repairs.
• The contractor would bill the insurance company, not the homeowner.

AOB arrangements only work for covered damage in need of repair. If you must replace belongings or appliances, you’d still need to work directly with your insurer and payments would go to you.

Protecting yourself in an assignment of benefits agreement

Don’t sign an assignment of benefits agreement right off the bat. Before you hire any contractor:

• Get multiple quotes.
• Check references, licenses, and their insurance.
• Get written estimates for potential work.
• Get a guarantee to back the workmanship.
• Make sure you get to approve the completed work.
• Request copies of all paperwork sent to your insurance company.
• Require that the contractor show you the documents you are actually signing.

You might be tempted to hire the first contractor you find, but you save yourself headaches if you do some due diligence before signing an assignment of benefits. Great contractors use this to expedite repairs and spare you some work. Take a beat to find that great contractor .

Related Posts: Keep exploring

Displaying post 1 / 3

Assignment of Benefits: What It Is, and How It Can Affect your Property Insurance Claim

Table of Contents

What is an Assignment of Benefits?

In the context of insured property claims, an assignment of benefits (AOB) is an agreement between you and a contractor in which you give the contractor your right to insurance payments for a specific scope of work .  In exchange, the contractor agrees that it will not seek payment from you for that scope of work, except for the amount of any applicable deductible.  In other words, you give part of your insurance claim to your contractor, and your contractor agrees not to collect from you for part of its work.

The most important thing to know about an assignment of benefits is that it puts your contractor in control your claim , at least for their scope of work.  Losing that control can significantly affect the direction and outcome of your claim, so you should fully understand the implications of an AOB (sometimes called an assignment of claims or AOC) before signing one.

How Does an Assignment of Benefits Work in Practice? 

Let’s say you’re an insured homeowner, and Hurricane Ian significantly damaged your roof.  Let’s also assume your homeowner’s policy covers that damage.  A roofer, after inspecting your roof and reviewing your insurance policy, might conclude that your insurer is probably going to pay for a roof replacement under your insurance policy.  The only problem is that it’s early in the recovery process, and your insurer hasn’t yet stated whether it will pay for the roof replacement proposed by your contractor. So if you want your roof replaced now, you would ordinarily agree to pay your roofer for the replacement, and wait in hopes that your insurer reimburses you for the work.  This means that if your insurance company refuses to pay or drags out payment, you’re on the hook to your roofer for the cost of the replacement.

As an alternative to agreeing to pay your roofer for the full cost of the work, you could sign an assignment of benefits for the roof replacement.  In this scenario, your roofer owns the part of your insurance claim that pertains to the roof replacement.  You might have to pay your roofer for the amount of your deductible, but you probably don’t have to pay them for the rest of the cost of the work.  And if your insurance company refuses to pay or drags out payment for the roof replacement, it’s your roofer, and not you, who would be on the hook for that shortfall.

So should you sign an AOB?  Not necessarily.  Read below to understand the pros and cons of an assignment of benefits.

Are There any Downsides to Signing an Assignment of Benefits?

Yes.  

You lose control of your claim . This is the most important factor to understand when considering whether to sign an AOB.  An AOB is a formal assignment of your legal rights to payment under your insurance contract.  Unless you’re able to cancel the AOB, your contractor will have full control over your claim as it relates to their work. 

To explain why that control could matter, let’s go back to the roof replacement example.  When you signed the AOB, the scope of work you agreed on was to replace the roof.  But you’re not a roofing expert, so you don’t know whether the costs charged or the materials used by the roofer in its statement of work are industry appropriate or not.  In most cases, they probably are appropriate, and there’s no problem.  But if they’re not – if, for instance, the roofer’s prices are unreasonably high – then the insurer may not approve coverage for the replacement.  At that point, the roofer could lower its prices so the insurer approves the work, but it doesn’t have to, because it controls the claim .  Instead it could hold up work and threaten to sue your insurer unless it approves the work at the originally proposed price.  Now the entire project is insnared in litigation, leaving you in a tough spot with your insurer for your other claims and, most importantly, with an old leaky roof.

Misunderstanding the Scope of Work.   Another issue that can arise is that you don’t understand the scope of the assignment of benefits.  Contractor estimates and scopes of work are often highly technical documents that can be long on detail but short on clarity.  Contractors are experts at reading and writing them.  You are not.  That difference matters because the extent of your assignment of benefits is based on that technical, difficult-to-understand scope of work.  This can lead to situations where your understanding of what you’re authorizing the contractor to do is very different from what you’ve actually authorized in the AOB agreement.

In many cases, it’s not necessary .   Many contractors will work with you and your insurer to provide a detailed estimate of their work, and will not begin that work until your insurer has approved coverage for it.  This arrangement significantly reduces the risk of you being on the hook for uninsured repairs, without creating any of the potential problems that can occur when you give away your rights to your claim.

Do I have to sign an Assignment of Benefits?

No.  You are absolutely not required to sign an AOB if you do not want to. 

Are There any Benefits to Signing an Assignment of Benefits?

Potentially, but only if you’ve fully vetted your contractor and your claim involves complicated and technical construction issues that you don’t want to deal with. 

First, you must do your homework to fully vet your contractor!  Do not just take their word for it or be duped by slick ads.  Read reviews, understand their certificate of insurance, know where they’re located, and, if possible, ask for and talk to references.  If you’ve determined that the contractor is highly competent at the work they do, is fully insured, and has a good reputation with customers, then that reduces the risk that they’ll abuse their rights to your claim.

Second, if your claim involves complicated reconstruction issues, a reputable contractor may be well equipped to handle the claim and move it forward.  If you don’t want to deal with the hassle of handling a complicated claim like this, and you know you have a good contractor, one way to get rid of that hassle is an AOB.

Another way to get rid of the hassle is to try Claimly, the all-in-one claims handling tool that get you results but keeps you in control of your claim.  

Can my insurance policy restrict the use of AOBs?

Yes, it’s possible that your Florida insurance policy restricts the use of AOBs, but only if all of the following criteria are met:

• When you selected your coverage, your insurer offered you a different policy with the same coverage, only it did not restrict the right to sign an AOB.
• Your insurer made the restricted policy available at a lower cost than the unrestricted policy.
• If the policy completely prohibits AOBs, then it was made available at a lower cost than any policy partially prohibiting AOBs.
• The policy includes on its face the following notice in 18-point uppercase and boldfaced type:

THIS POLICY DOES NOT ALLOW THE UNRESTRICTED ASSIGNMENT OF POST-LOSS INSURANCE BENEFITS. BY SELECTING THIS POLICY, YOU WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO FREELY ASSIGN OR TRANSFER THE POST-LOSS PROPERTY INSURANCE BENEFITS AVAILABLE UNDER THIS POLICY TO A THIRD PARTY OR TO OTHERWISE FREELY ENTER INTO AN ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT AS THE TERM IS DEFINED IN SECTION 627.7153 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES.

627.7153. 

Pro Tip : If you have an electronic copy of your complete insurance policy (not just the declaration page), then search for “policy does not allow the unrestricted assignment” or another phrase from the required language above to see if your policy restricts an AOB.  If your policy doesn’t contain this required language, it probably doesn’t restrict AOBs.

Do I have any rights or protections concerning Assignments of Benefits?

Yes, you do.  Florida recently enacted laws that protect consumers when dealing with an AOB.

Protections in the AOB Contract

To be enforceable, a Assignments of Benefits must meet all of the following requirements:

• Be in writing and executed by and between you and the contractor.
• Contain a provision that allows you to cancel the assignment agreement without a penalty or fee by submitting a written notice of cancellation signed by the you to the assignee:
• at least 30 days after the date work on the property is scheduled to commence if the assignee has not substantially performed, or
• at least 30 days after the execution of the agreement if the agreement does not contain a commencement date and the assignee has not begun substantial work on the property.
• Contain a provision requiring the assignee to provide a copy of the executed assignment agreement to the insurer within 3 business days after the date on which the assignment agreement is executed or the date on which work begins, whichever is earlier.
• Contain a written, itemized, per-unit cost estimate of the services to be performed by the assignee .
• Relate only to work to be performed by the assignee for services to protect, repair, restore, or replace a dwelling or structure or to mitigate against further damage to such property.
• Contain the following notice in 18-point uppercase and boldfaced type:

YOU ARE AGREEING TO GIVE UP CERTAIN RIGHTS YOU HAVE UNDER YOUR INSURANCE POLICY TO A THIRD PARTY, WHICH MAY RESULT IN LITIGATION AGAINST YOUR INSURER. PLEASE READ AND UNDERSTAND THIS DOCUMENT BEFORE SIGNING IT. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO CANCEL THIS AGREEMENT WITHOUT PENALTY WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER THE DATE THIS AGREEMENT IS EXECUTED, AT LEAST 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE WORK ON THE PROPERTY IS SCHEDULED TO COMMENCE IF THE ASSIGNEE HAS NOT SUBSTANTIALLY PERFORMED, OR AT LEAST 30 DAYS AFTER THE EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT IF THE AGREEMENT DOES NOT CONTAIN A COMMENCEMENT DATE AND THE ASSIGNEE HAS NOT BEGUN SUBSTANTIAL WORK ON THE PROPERTY. HOWEVER, YOU ARE OBLIGATED FOR PAYMENT OF ANY CONTRACTED WORK PERFORMED BEFORE THE AGREEMENT IS RESCINDED. THIS AGREEMENT DOES NOT CHANGE YOUR OBLIGATION TO PERFORM THE DUTIES REQUIRED UNDER YOUR PROPERTY INSURANCE POLICY.

• Contain a provision requiring the assignee to indemnify and hold harmless the assignor from all liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, attorney fees.

Contractor Duties

Under Florida law, a contractor (or anyone else) receiving rights to a claim under an AOB:

• Must provide you with accurate and up-to-date revised estimates of the scope of work to be performed as supplemental or additional repairs are required.
• Must perform the work in accordance with accepted industry standards.
• May not seek payment from you exceeding the applicable deductible under the policy unless asked the contractor to perform additional work at the your own expense.
• Must, as a condition precedent to filing suit under the policy, and, if required by the insurer, submit to examinations under oath and recorded statements conducted by the insurer or the insurer’s representative that are reasonably necessary, based on the scope of the work and the complexity of the claim, which examinations and recorded statements must be limited to matters related to the services provided, the cost of the services, and the assignment agreement.
• Must, as a condition precedent to filing suit under the policy, and, if required by the insurer, participate in appraisal or other alternative dispute resolution methods in accordance with the terms of the policy.
• If the contractor is making emergency repairs, the assignment of benefits cannot exceed the greater of $3,000 or 1% of your Coverage A limit.

Recommended Posts

New legislation alert: 2022 changes to florida property insurance laws and how they affect you, property coverages in homeowners insurance: everything you need to know., understanding the new proof-of-loss form requirements in florida..

Brelly’s tools and resources are your secret weapon to getting your insurance claim filed right, moving fast, and paid fully .

• Practice Areas
• Terminology
• Entrepreneurship
• Medical Billing
• Healthcare Conferences

What is Assignment of Benefits in Medical Billing?

An assignment of benefits is the act of signing documentation authorizing a health insurance company to pay a physician directly. In other words, the insurance company can pay claims without the direct involvement of the patient in the process. There are other situations where AOBs can be helpful, but we’ll focus on their use in relation to medical benefits.

If there isn’t an assignment of benefits agreement in place, the patient would be responsible for paying the other party directly from their own pocket, then filing a claim with their insurance provider to receive reimbursement. This could be time-consuming and costly, especially if the patient has no idea how to file a claim.

The document is typically signed by patients when they undergo medical procedures. The purpose of this form is to assign the responsibility of payment for any future medical bills that may arise after the procedure. It’s important to note that not all procedures require an AOB.

An assignment of benefits agreement might be utilized to pay a medical practitioner the patient didn’t choose, like an anesthesiologist. The patient may have picked a surgeon, but an anesthesiologist assigned on the day of the procedure might issue a separate bill. They’re, in essence, signing that anyone involved in their treatment can receive direct payment from the insurance carrier. It doesn’t have to go through the patient.

This document can also eliminate service fees surrounding processing. As a result, the patient can focus on medical treatment and recovery without being bogged down with the complexities of paying medical bills. The overall intent of an assignment of benefits agreement is to make the process more manageable for the patient, as they don’t need to haggle directly with their insurer.

List of Providers and Services

When the patient signs an AOB agreement, they give a third party right to obtain payment for services the provider performed, and medical billing services are a prime example of where they may sign an AOB agreement.

• Ambulance services
• Medical insurance claims
• Drugs and pharmaceuticals
• Diagnostic and clinical lab services
• Emergency surgical center services
• Dialysis supplies and equipment used in the home
• Physician services for Medicare and Medicaid patients

Services of professionals other than a primary care physician, which includes:

• Physician assistants
• Clinical nurse specialists
• Clinical social workers
• Clinical psychologists
• Certified registered nurse anesthetists

Information Commonly Requested on Assignment of Benefits Form:

• Signature of patient or person legally responsible
• Signature of parent or legal guardian

How AOBs Affect the Medical Practitioner

A medical provider or their administrative staff may feel overwhelmed by the sheer number of forms patients must fill out prior to treatment. Demanding more paperwork from patients may be seen as an added burden on the managerial staff, as well as the patient. However, getting a signed AOB is vital in preserving the interests of everyone involved.

In addition to receiving direct payment from the insurance company without needing to go through the patient, a signed assignment of benefits form will help medical providers appeal denied and underpaid claims. They can ask that payments be made directly to them rather than through the patient. This makes the process more manageable for both the doctors and the patient.

Things to Bear in Mind

The patient gives their rights and benefits to third parties under their current health plan. Depending on the wording in the AOB, their insurer may not be allowed to contact them directly about their claims. In addition, the patient may be unable to negotiate settlements or approve payments on their behalf and enable third parties to endorse checks on behalf of the patient. Finally, when the patient signs an AOB, the insurer may sue the third parties involved in the dispute.

Looking for a qualified medical billing service?

By taking just 1 minute to provide some basic information about your practice, you can get up to 5 pre-screened companies competing for your business.

Related Posts

What Is Cosmetic Dermatology? Your Guide to Treatments, Costs, and More

What is a clia number in medical billing, healthcare revenue cycle management explained, leave a reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Construction Accidents

Practice Areas

Assignment of Benefits: What You Need to Know

• August 17, 2022
• Steven Schwartzapfel

Insurance can be useful, but dealing with the back-and-forth between insurance companies and contractors, medical specialists, and others can be a time-consuming and ultimately unpleasant experience. You want your medical bills to be paid without having to act as a middleman between your healthcare provider and your insurer.

However, there’s a way you can streamline this process. With an assignment of benefits, you can designate your healthcare provider or any other insurance payout recipient as the go-to party for insurance claims. While this can be convenient, there are certain risks to keep in mind as well.

Below, we’ll explore what an assignment of insurance benefits is (as well as other forms of remediation), how it works, and when you should employ it. For more information, or to learn whether you may have a claim against an insurer, contact Schwartzapfel Lawyers now at 1-516-342-2200 .

What Is an Assignment of Benefits?

An assignment of benefits (AOB) is a legal process through which an insured individual or party signs paperwork that designates another party like a contractor, company, or healthcare provider as their insurance claimant .

Suppose you’re injured in a car accident and need to file a claim with your health insurance company for medical bills and related costs. However, you also need plenty of time to recover. The thought of constantly negotiating between your insurance company, your healthcare provider, and anyone else seems draining and unwelcome.

With an assignment of benefits, you can designate your healthcare provider as your insurance claimant. Then, your healthcare provider can request insurance payouts from your healthcare insurance provider directly.

Through this system, the health insurance provider directly pays your physician or hospital rather than paying you. This means you don’t have to pay your healthcare provider. It’s a streamlined, straightforward way to make sure insurance money gets where it needs to go. It also saves you time and prevents you from having to think about insurance payments unless absolutely necessary.

What Does an Assignment of Benefits Mean?

An AOB means that you designate another party as your insurance claimant. In the above example, that’s your healthcare provider, which could be a physician, hospital, or other organization.

With the assignment of insurance coverage, that healthcare provider can then make a claim for insurance payments directly to your insurance company. The insurance company then pays your healthcare provider directly, and you’re removed as the middleman.

As a bonus, this system sometimes cuts down on your overall costs by eliminating certain service fees. Since there’s only one transaction — the transaction between your healthcare provider and your health insurer — there’s only one set of service fees to contend with. You don’t have to deal with two sets of service fees from first receiving money from your insurance provider, then sending that money to your healthcare provider.

Ultimately, the point of an assignment of benefits is to make things easier for you, your insurer, and anyone else involved in the process.

What Types of Insurance Qualify for an Assignment of Benefits?

Most types of commonly held insurance can work with an assignment of benefits. These insurance types include car insurance, healthcare insurance, homeowners insurance, property insurance, and more.

Note that not all insurance companies allow you to use an assignment of benefits. For an assignment of benefits to work, the potential insurance claimant and the insurance company in question must each sign the paperwork and agree to the arrangement. This prevents fraud (to some extent) and ensures that every party goes into the arrangement with clear expectations.

If your insurance company does not accept assignments of benefits, you’ll have to take care of insurance payments the traditional way. There are many reasons why an insurance company may not accept an assignment of benefits.

To speak with a Schwartzapfel Lawyers expert about this directly, call 1-516-342-2200 for a free consultation today. It will be our privilege to assist you with all your legal questions, needs, and recovery efforts.

Who Uses Assignments of Benefits?

Many providers, services, and contractors use assignments of benefits. It’s often in their interests to accept an assignment of benefits since they can get paid for their work more quickly and make critical decisions without having to consult the insurance policyholder first.

Imagine a circumstance in which a homeowner wants a contractor to add a new room to their property. The contractor knows that the scale of the project could increase or shrink depending on the specifics of the job, the weather, and other factors.

If the homeowner uses an assignment of benefits to give the contractor rights to make insurance claims for the project, that contractor can then:

• Bill the insurer directly for their work. This is beneficial since it ensures that the contractor’s employees get paid promptly and they can purchase the supplies they need.
• Make important decisions to ensure that the project completes on time. For example, a contract can authorize another insurance claim for extra supplies without consulting with the homeowner beforehand, saving time and potentially money in the process.

Practically any company or organization that receives payments from insurance companies may choose to take advantage of an assignment of benefits with you. Example companies and providers include:

• Ambulance services
• Drug and biological companies
• Lab diagnostic services
• Hospitals and medical centers like clinics
• Certified medical professionals such as nurse anesthetists, nurse midwives, clinical psychologists, and others
• Ambulatory surgical center services
• Permanent repair and improvement contractors like carpenters, plumbers, roofers, restoration companies, and others
• Auto repair shops and mechanic organizations

Advantages of Using an Assignment of Benefits

An assignment of benefits can be an advantageous contract to employ, especially if you believe that you’ll need to pay a contractor, healthcare provider, and/or other organization via insurance payouts regularly for the near future.

These benefits include but are not limited to:

• Save time for yourself. Again, imagine a circumstance in which you are hospitalized and have to pay your healthcare provider through your health insurance payouts. If you use an assignment of benefits, you don’t have to make the payments personally or oversee the insurance payouts. Instead, you can focus on resting and recovering.
• Possibly save yourself money in the long run. As noted above, an assignment of benefits can help you circumvent some service fees by limiting the number of transactions or money transfers required to ensure everyone is paid on time.
• Increased peace of mind. Many people don’t like having to constantly think about insurance payouts, contacting their insurance company, or negotiating between insurers and contractors/providers. With an assignment of benefits, you can let your insurance company and a contractor or provider work things out between them, though this can lead to applications later down the road.

Because of these benefits, many recovering individuals, car accident victims, homeowners, and others utilize AOB agreements from time to time.

Risks of Using an Assignment of Benefits

Worth mentioning, too, is that an assignment of benefits does carry certain risks you should be aware of before presenting this contract to your insurance company or a contractor or provider. Remember, an assignment of benefits is a legally binding contract unless it is otherwise dissolved (which is technically possible).

The risks of using an assignment of benefits include:

• You give billing control to your healthcare provider, contractor, or another party. This allows them to bill your insurance company for charges that you might not find necessary. For example, a home improvement contractor might bill a homeowner’s insurance company for an unnecessary material or improvement. The homeowner only finds out after the fact and after all the money has been paid, resulting in a higher premium for their insurance policy or more fees than they expected.
• You allow a contractor or service provider to sue your insurance company if the insurer does not want to pay for a certain service or bill. This can happen if the insurance company and contractor or service provider disagree on one or another billable item. Then, you may be dragged into litigation or arbitration you did not agree to in the first place.
• You may lose track of what your insurance company pays for various services . As such, you could be surprised if your health insurance or other insurance premiums and deductibles increase suddenly.

Given these disadvantages, it’s still wise to keep track of insurance payments even if you choose to use an assignment of benefits. For example, you might request that your insurance company keep you up to date on all billable items a contractor or service provider charges for the duration of your treatment or project.

For more on this and related topic, call Schwartzapfel Lawyers now at 1-516-342-2200 .

How To Make Sure an Assignment of Benefits Is Safe

Even though AOBs do carry potential disadvantages, there are ways to make sure that your chosen contract is safe and legally airtight. First, it’s generally a wise idea to contact knowledgeable legal representatives so they can look over your paperwork and ensure that any given assignment of benefits doesn’t contain any loopholes that could be exploited by a service provider or contractor.

The right lawyer can also make sure that an assignment of benefits is legally binding for your insurance provider. To make sure an assignment of benefits is safe, you should perform the following steps:

• Always check for reviews and references before hiring a contractor or service provider, especially if you plan to use an AOB ahead of time. For example, you should stay away if a contractor has a reputation for abusing insurance claims.
• Always get several estimates for work, repairs, or bills. Then, you can compare the estimated bills and see whether one contractor or service provider is likely to be honest about their charges.
• Get all estimates, payment schedules, and project schedules in writing so you can refer back to them later on.
• Don’t let a service provider or contractor pressure you into hiring them for any reason . If they seem overly excited about getting started, they could be trying to rush things along or get you to sign an AOB so that they can start issuing charges to your insurance company.
• Read your assignment of benefits contract fully. Make sure that there aren’t any legal loopholes that a contractor or service provider can take advantage of. An experienced lawyer can help you draft and sign a beneficial AOB contract.

Can You Sue a Party for Abusing an Assignment of Benefits?

Sometimes. If you believe your assignment of benefits is being abused by a contractor or service provider, you may be able to sue them for breaching your contract or even AOB fraud. However, successfully suing for insurance fraud of any kind is often difficult.

Also, you should remember that a contractor or service provider can sue your insurance company if the insurance carrier decides not to pay them. For example, if your insurer decides that a service provider is engaging in billing scams and no longer wishes to make payouts, this could put you in legal hot water.

If you’re not sure whether you have grounds for a lawsuit, contact Schwartzapfel Lawyers today at 1-516-342-2200 . At no charge, we’ll examine the details of your case and provide you with a consultation. Don’t wait. Call now!

Assignment of Benefits FAQs

Which states allow assignments of benefits.

Every state allows you to offer an assignment of benefits to a contractor and/or insurance company. That means, whether you live in New York, Florida, Arizona, California, or some other state, you can rest assured that AOBs are viable tools to streamline the insurance payout process.

Can You Revoke an Assignment of Benefits?

Yes. There may come a time when you need to revoke an assignment of benefits. This may be because you no longer want the provider or contractor to have control over your insurance claims, or because you want to switch providers/contractors.

To revoke an assignment of benefits agreement, you must notify the assignee (i.e., the new insurance claimant). A legally solid assignment of benefits contract should also include terms and rules for this decision. Once more, it’s usually a wise idea to have an experienced lawyer look over an assignment of benefits contract to make sure you don’t miss these by accident.

Contact Schwartzapfel Lawyers Today

An assignment of benefits is an invaluable tool when you need to streamline the insurance claims process. For example, you can designate your healthcare provider as your primary claimant with an assignment of benefits, allowing them to charge your insurance company directly for healthcare costs.

However, there are also risks associated with an assignment of benefits. If you believe a contractor or healthcare provider is charging your insurance company unfairly, you may need legal representatives. Schwartzapfel Lawyers can help.

As knowledgeable New York attorneys who are well-versed in New York insurance law, we’re ready to assist with any and all litigation needs. For a free case evaluation and consultation, contact Schwartzapfel Lawyers today at 1-516-342-2200 !

Schwartzapfel Lawyers, P.C. | Fighting For You™™

What Is an Insurance Claim? | Experian

What is assignment of benefits, and how does it impact insurers? | Insurance Business Mag

Florida Insurance Ruling Sets Precedent for Assignment of Benefits | Law.com

Related Posts

Preponderance Of Evidence: Meaning & Legal Breakdown

Understanding civil lawsuits can feel overwhelming, especially when you’re trying to wrap your head around all the legal jargon. To

What Is Hearsay: Definition & Examples

Hearsay is a term that’s thrown around often, but what is it, exactly? Contrary to popular belief, hearsay isn’t just

The 5 Largest OSHA Fines In History

In the workplace, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guards the well-being of workers through their meticulous guidelines. To

We'll Fight For You

Schwartzapfel® lawyers has a 99% client satisfaction rate.

Quick Links

• News & Events
• Verdicts & Settlements
• Video Gallery
• Wrongful Death
• Vehicle Accidents
• Slip & Fall
• Medical Malpractice
• Workers' Compensation
• Personal Injuries
• Product Liability
• Garden City

Assignment of benefits

Assignment of benefits is a legal agreement where a patient authorizes their healthcare provider to receive direct payment from the insurance company for services rendered.

Boost patient experience and your bottom line by automating patient cost estimates, payer underpayment detection, and contract optimization in one place.

What is Assignment of Benefits?

Assignment of benefits (AOB) is a crucial concept in the healthcare revenue cycle management (RCM) process. It refers to the legal transfer of the patient's rights to receive insurance benefits directly to the healthcare provider. In simpler terms, it allows healthcare providers to receive payment directly from the insurance company, rather than the patient being responsible for paying the provider and then seeking reimbursement from their insurance company.

Understanding Assignment of Benefits

When a patient seeks medical services, they typically have health insurance coverage that helps them pay for the cost of their healthcare. In most cases, the patient is responsible for paying a portion of the bill, known as the copayment or deductible, while the insurance company covers the remaining amount. However, in situations where the patient has assigned their benefits to the healthcare provider, the provider can directly bill the insurance company for the services rendered.

The assignment of benefits is a legal agreement between the patient and the healthcare provider. By signing this agreement, the patient authorizes the healthcare provider to receive payment directly from the insurance company on their behalf. This ensures that the provider receives timely payment for the services provided, reducing the financial burden on the patient.

Difference between Assignment of Benefits and Power of Attorney

While the assignment of benefits may seem similar to a power of attorney (POA) in some respects, they are distinct legal concepts. A power of attorney grants someone the authority to make decisions and act on behalf of another person, including financial matters. On the other hand, an assignment of benefits only transfers the right to receive insurance benefits directly to the healthcare provider.

In healthcare, a power of attorney is typically used in situations where a patient is unable to make decisions about their medical care. It allows a designated individual, known as the healthcare proxy, to make decisions on behalf of the patient. In contrast, an assignment of benefits is used to streamline the payment process between the healthcare provider and the insurance company.

Examples of Assignment of Benefits

To better understand how assignment of benefits works, let's consider a few examples:

Sarah visits her primary care physician for a routine check-up. She has health insurance coverage through her employer. Before the appointment, Sarah signs an assignment of benefits form, authorizing her physician to receive payment directly from her insurance company. After the visit, the physician submits the claim to the insurance company, and they reimburse the physician directly for the covered services.

John undergoes a surgical procedure at a hospital. He has health insurance coverage through a private insurer. Prior to the surgery, John signs an assignment of benefits form, allowing the hospital to receive payment directly from his insurance company. The hospital submits the claim to the insurance company, and they reimburse the hospital for the covered services. John is responsible for paying any copayments or deductibles directly to the hospital.

Mary visits a specialist for a specific medical condition. She has health insurance coverage through a government program. Mary signs an assignment of benefits form, granting the specialist the right to receive payment directly from the government program. The specialist submits the claim to the program, and they reimburse the specialist for the covered services. Mary is responsible for any applicable copayments or deductibles.

In each of these examples, the assignment of benefits allows the healthcare provider to receive payment directly from the insurance company, simplifying the billing and reimbursement process for both the provider and the patient.

Assignment of benefits is a fundamental concept in healthcare revenue cycle management. It enables healthcare providers to receive payment directly from the insurance company, reducing the financial burden on patients and streamlining the billing process. By understanding the assignment of benefits, patients can make informed decisions about their healthcare and ensure that their providers receive timely payment for the services rendered.

Improve your financial performance while providing a more transparent patient experience

Related terms.

Formulary is a list of prescription drugs covered by a specific health insurance plan, indicating the preferred medications and their coverage details.

Single coverage

Single coverage is a healthcare insurance plan that provides benefits to only one individual, typically excluding dependents or other family members.

Subscribe to the 

 Healthcare Clarified newsletter

Get the latest insights on RCM and healthcare policy in your inbox

Assignment Of Benefits

What does assignment of benefits mean.

Assignment of benefits (AOB) is the official way an insured person asks their insurance company to pay a professional or facility for services rendered.

Insuranceopedia Explains Assignment Of Benefits

Assignment of benefits is a document that directs payment to a third party at the insured’s request. It becomes legitimate once both the insured party and their insurer have signed the AOB form. AOB is used in a number of insurance contexts, such as paying physicians or clinics through health insurance or paying contractors for repairs through a homeowner’s insurance policy.

Usually, AOBs are issued when the third party pursues it in the hopes that payment from the insurance company will be more certain and delivered more quickly than it would be from the insured.

Related Definitions

Rental value insurance, change of occupation provision, force-placed insurance, guaranteed asset protection insurance, insurance to value, loss report, no benefit to bailee provision, guaranteed renewable contract, related terms, certificate of coverage, third party, medical payments insurance, related articles, how to lower your health insurance rates, 10 tips for choosing the right health insurance policy, 10 things you need to know about health insurance in the united states, the ultimate guide to auto insurance, insurance self-service portal: the future of customer experience, blockchain’s impact on transforming the insurance landscape, trending articles.

What is an assignment of benefits?

The last time you sought medical care, you likely made an appointment with your provider, got the treatment you needed, paid your copay or deductible, and that was it. No paperwork, no waiting to be reimbursed; your doctor received payment from your insurance company and you both went on with your lives.

This is how most people receive health care in the U.S. This system, known as assignment of benefits or AOB, is now being used with other types of insurance, including auto and homeowners coverage . 

What is an assignment of benefits?  

An AOB is a legal agreement that allows your insurance company to directly pay a third party for services performed on your behalf. In the case of health care, it could be your doctor or another medical professional providing care. With a homeowners, renters, or auto insurance claim, the third party could be a contractor, auto repair shop, or other facility.

Assignment of benefits is legal, thanks to a concept known as freedom of contract, which says two parties may make a private agreement, including the forfeiture of certain rights, and the government may not interfere. There are exceptions, making freedom of contract something less than an absolute right. For example, the contract may not violate the law or contain unfair terms.

Not all doctors or contractors utilize AOBs. Therefore, it’s a good idea to make sure the doctor or service provider and you are on the same page when it comes to AOBs before treatment or work begins.

How an AOB works

The function of an AOB agreement varies depending on the type of insurance policy involved, the healthcare provider, contractor, or service provider, and increasingly, state law. Although an AOB is normal in health insurance, other applications of assignment of benefits have now included the auto and homeowners insurance industry.

Because AOBs are common in health care, you probably don’t think twice about signing a piece of paper that says “assignment of benefits” across the top. But once you sign it, you’re likely turning over your right to deal with your insurance company regarding service from that provider. Why would you do this? 

According to Dr. David Berg of Redirect Health , the reason is simple: “Without an AOB in place, the patient themselves would be responsible for paying the cost of their service and would then file a claim with their insurance company for reimbursement.”

With homeowners or auto insurance, the same rules apply. Once you sign the AOB, you are effectively out of the picture. The contractor who reroofs your house or the mechanic who rebuilds your engine works with your insurance company by filing a claim on your behalf and receiving their money without your help or involvement.

“Each state has its own rules, regulations, and permissions regarding AOBs,” says Gregg Barrett, founder and CEO of WaterStreet , a cloud-based P&C insurance administration platform. “Some states require a strict written breakdown of work to be done, while others allow assignment of only parts of claims.” 

Within the guidelines of the specific insurance rules for AOBs in your state, the general steps include:

• You and your contractor draw up an AOB clause as part of the contract.
• The contract stipulates the exact work that will be completed and all necessary details.
• The contractor sends the completed AOB to the insurance company where an adjuster reviews, asks questions, and resolves any discrepancies.
• The contractor’s name (or that of an agreed-upon party) is listed to go on the settlement check.

After work is complete and signed off, the insurer will issue the check and the claim will be considered settled.

Example of an assignment of benefits  

If you’re dealing with insurance, how would an AOB factor in? Let’s take an example. “Say you have a water leak in the house,” says Angel Conlin, chief insurance officer at Kin Insurance . “You call a home restoration company to stop the water flow, clean up the mess, and restore your home to its former glory. The restoration company may ask for an assignment of benefits so it can deal directly with the insurance company without your input.”

In this case, by eliminating the homeowner, whose interests are already represented by an experienced insurance adjustor, the AOB reduces redundancy, saves time and money, and allows the restoration process to proceed with much greater efficiency.

When would you need to use an assignment of benefits?  

An AOB can simplify complicated and costly insurance transactions and allow you to turn these transactions over to trusted experts, thereby avoiding time-consuming negotiations. 

An AOB also frees you from paying the entire bill upfront and seeking reimbursement from your insurance company after work has been completed or services rendered. Since you are not required to sign an assignment of benefits, failure to sign will result in you paying the entire medical bill and filing for reimbursement. The three most common uses of AOBs are with health insurance, car insurance, and homeowners insurance.

Assignment of benefits for health insurance

As discussed, AOBs in health insurance are commonplace. If you have health insurance, you’ve probably signed AOBs for years. Each provider (doctor) or practice requires a separate AOB. From your point of view, the big advantages of an AOB are that you receive medical care, your doctor and insurance company work out the details and, in the event of a disagreement, those two entities deal with each other. 

Assignment of benefits for car owners

If your car is damaged in an accident and needs extensive repair, the benefits of an AOB can quickly add up. Not only will you have your automobile repaired with minimal upfront costs to you, inconvenience will be almost nonexistent. You drop your car off (or have it towed), wait to be called, told the repair is finished, and pick it up. Similar to a health care AOB, disagreements are worked out between the provider and insurer. You are usually not involved.

Assignment of benefits for homeowners  

When your home or belongings are damaged or destroyed, your primary concern is to “return to normal.” You want to do this with the least amount of hassle. An AOB allows you to transfer your rights to a third party, usually a contractor, freeing you to deal with the crisis at hand.

When you sign an AOB, your contractor can begin immediately working on damage repair, shoring up against additional deterioration, and coordinating with various subcontractors without waiting for clearance or communication with you.

The fraud factor

No legal agreement, including an AOB, is free from the possibility of abuse or fraud. Built-in safeguards are essential to ensure the benefits you assign to a third party are as protected as possible.

In terms of what can and does go wrong, the answer is: plenty. According to the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMICs), examples of AOB fraud include inflated invoices or charges for work that hasn’t been done. Another common tactic is to sue the insurance company, without the policyholder’s knowledge or consent, something that can ultimately result in the policyholder being stuck with the bill and higher insurance premiums due to losses experienced by the insurer.

State legislatures have tried to protect consumers from AOB fraud and some progress has been made. Florida, for example, passed legislation in 2019 that gives consumers the right to rescind a fraudulent contract and requires that AOB contracts include an itemized description of the work to be done. Other states, including North Dakota, Kansas, and Iowa have all signed NAMIC-backed legislation into law to protect consumers from AOB fraud.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), offers advice for consumers to help avoid AOB fraud and abuse:

• File a claim with your insurer before you hire a contractor. This ensures you know what repairs need to be made.
• Don’t pay in full upfront. Legitimate contractors do not require it.
• Get three estimates before selecting a contractor.
• Get a full written contract and read it carefully before signing.
• Don’t be pressured into signing an AOB. You are not required to sign an AOB.

Pros and cons of an assignment of benefits  

The advantages and disadvantages of an AOB agreement depend largely on the amount and type of protection your state’s insurance laws provide.  

Pros of assignment of benefits

With proper safeguards in place to reduce opportunities for fraud, AOBs have the ability to streamline and simplify the insurance claims process.

• An AOB frees you from paying for services and waiting for reimbursement from your insurer.
• Some people appreciate not needing to negotiate with their insurer.
• You are not required to sign an AOB.

Cons of assignment of benefits

As with most contracts, AOBs are a double-edged sword. Be aware of potential traps and ask questions if you are unsure.

• Signing an AOB could make you the victim of a scam without knowing it until your insurer refuses to pay.
• An AOB doesn’t free you from the ultimate responsibility to pay for services rendered, which could drag you into expensive litigation if things go south.
• Any AOB you do sign is legally binding.

The takeaway  

An AOB, as the health insurance example shows, can simplify complicated and costly insurance transactions and help consumers avoid time-consuming negotiations. And it can save upfront costs while letting experts work out the details.

It can also introduce a nightmare scenario laced with fraud requiring years of costly litigation. Universal state-level legislation with safeguards is required to avoid the latter. Until that is in place, your best bet is to work closely with your insurer when signing an AOB. Look for suspicious or inflated charges when negotiating with contractors, providers, and other servicers.

EDITORIAL DISCLOSURE : The advice, opinions, or rankings contained in this article are solely those of the Fortune Recommends ™ editorial team. This content has not been reviewed or endorsed by any of our affiliate partners or other third parties.

• Type 2 Diabetes
• Heart Disease
• Digestive Health
• Multiple Sclerosis
• COVID-19 Vaccines
• Occupational Therapy
• Healthy Aging
• Health Insurance
• Public Health
• Patient Rights
• Caregivers & Loved Ones
• End of Life Concerns
• Health News
• Thyroid Test Analyzer
• Doctor Discussion Guides
• Hemoglobin A1c Test Analyzer
• Lipid Test Analyzer
• Complete Blood Count (CBC) Analyzer
• What to Buy
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Medical Expert Board

Medicare Assignment: Everything You Need to Know

Medicare assignment.

• Providers Accepting Assignment
• Providers Who Do Not
• Billing Options
• Assignment of Benefits
• How to Choose

Frequently Asked Questions

Medicare assignment is an agreement between Medicare and medical providers (doctors, hospitals, medical equipment suppliers, etc.) in which the provider agrees to accept Medicare’s fee schedule as payment in full when Medicare patients are treated.

This article will explain how Medicare assignment works, and what you need to know in order to ensure that you won’t receive unexpected bills.

fizkes / Getty Images

There are 35 million Americans who have Original Medicare. Medicare is a federal program and most medical providers throughout the country accept assignment with Medicare. As a result, these enrollees have a lot more options for medical providers than most of the rest of the population.

They can see any provider who accepts assignment, anywhere in the country. They can be assured that they will only have to pay their expected Medicare cost-sharing (deductible and coinsurance, some or all of which may be paid by a Medigap plan , Medicaid, or supplemental coverage provided by an employer or former employer).

It’s important to note here that the rules are different for the 29 million Americans who have Medicare Advantage plans. These beneficiaries cannot simply use any medical provider who accepts Medicare assignment.

Instead, each Medicare Advantage plan has its own network of providers —much like the health insurance plans that many Americans are accustomed to obtaining from employers or purchasing in the exchange/marketplace .

A provider who accepts assignment with Medicare may or may not be in-network with some or all of the Medicare Advantage plans that offer coverage in a given area. Some Medicare Advantage plans— health maintenance organizations (HMOs) , in particular—will only cover an enrollee’s claims if they use providers who are in the plan's network.

Other Medicare Advantage plans— preferred provider organizations (PPOs) , in particular—will cover out-of-network care but the enrollee will pay more than they would have paid had they seen an in-network provider.

Original Medicare

The bottom line is that Medicare assignment only determines provider accessibility and costs for people who have Original Medicare. People with Medicare Advantage need to understand their own plan’s provider network and coverage rules.

When discussing Medicare assignment and access to providers in this article, keep in mind that it is referring to people who have Original Medicare.

How to Make Sure Your Provider Accepts Assignment

Most doctors, hospitals, and other medical providers in the United States do accept Medicare assignment.

Provider Participation Stats

According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 98% of providers participate in Medicare, which means they accept assignment.

You can ask the provider directly about their participation with Medicare. But Medicare also has a tool that you can use to find participating doctors, hospitals, home health care services, and other providers.

There’s a filter on that tool labeled “Medicare-approved payment.” If you turn on that filter, you will only see providers who accept Medicare assignment. Under each provider’s information, it will say “Charges the Medicare-approved amount (so you pay less out-of-pocket).”

What If Your Provider Doesn’t Accept Assignment?

If your medical provider or equipment supplier doesn’t accept assignment, it means they haven’t agreed to accept Medicare’s approved amounts as payment in full for all of the services.

These providers can still choose to accept assignment on a case-by-case basis. But because they haven’t agreed to accept Medicare assignment for all services, they are considered nonparticipating providers.

Note that "nonparticipating" does not mean that a provider has opted out of Medicare altogether. Medicare will still pay claims for services received from a nonparticipating provider (i.e., one who does not accept Medicare assignment), whereas Medicare does not cover any of the cost of services obtained from a provider who has officially opted out of Medicare.

If a Medicare beneficiary uses a provider who has opted out of Medicare, that person will pay the provider directly and Medicare will not be involved in any way.

Physicians Who Have Opted Out

Only about 1% of all non-pediatric physicians have opted out of Medicare.

For providers who have not opted out of Medicare but who also don’t accept assignment, Medicare will still pay nearly as much as it would have paid if you had used a provider who accepts assignment. Here’s how it works:

• Medicare will pay the provider 95% of the amount they would pay if the provider accepted assignment.
• The provider can charge the person receiving care more than the Medicare-approved amount, but only up to 15% more (some states limit this further). This extra amount, which the patient has to pay out-of-pocket, is known as the limiting charge . But the 15% cap does not apply to medical equipment suppliers; if they do not accept assignment with Medicare, there is no limit on how much they can charge the person receiving care. This is why it’s particularly important to make sure that the supplier accepts Medicare assignment if you need medical equipment.
• The nonparticipating provider may require the person receiving care to pay the entire bill up front and seek reimbursement from Medicare (using Form CMS 1490-S ). Alternatively, they may submit a claim to Medicare on behalf of the person receiving care (using Form CMS-1500 ).
• A nonparticipating provider can choose to accept assignment on a case-by-case basis. They can indicate this on Form CMS-1500 in box 27. The vast majority of nonparticipating providers who bill Medicare choose to accept assignment for the claim being billed.
• Nonparticipating providers do not have to bill your Medigap plan on your behalf.

Billing Options for Providers Who Accept Medicare

When a medical provider accepts assignment with Medicare, part of the agreement is that they will submit bills to Medicare on behalf of the person receiving care. So if you only see providers who accept assignment, you will never need to submit your own bills to Medicare for reimbursement.

If you have a Medigap plan that supplements your Original Medicare coverage, you should present the Medigap coverage information to the provider at the time of service. Medicare will forward the claim information to your Medigap insurer, reducing administrative work on your part.

Depending on the Medigap plan you have, the services that you receive, and the amount you’ve already spent in out-of-pocket costs, the Medigap plan may pay some or all of the out-of-pocket costs that you would otherwise have after Medicare pays its share.

(Note that if you have a type of Medigap plan called Medicare SELECT, you will have to stay within the plan’s network of providers in order to receive benefits. But this is not the case with other Medigap plans.)

After the claim is processed, you’ll be able to see details in your MyMedicare.gov account . Medicare will also send you a Medicare Summary Notice. This is Medicare’s version of an explanation of benefits (EOB) , which is sent out every three months.

If you have a Medigap plan, it should also send you an EOB or something similar, explaining the claim and whether the policy paid any part of it.

What Is Medicare Assignment of Benefits?

For Medicare beneficiaries, assignment of benefits means that the person receiving care agrees to allow a nonparticipating provider to bill Medicare directly (as opposed to having the person receiving care pay the bill up front and seek reimbursement from Medicare). Assignment of benefits is authorized by the person receiving care in Box 13 of Form CMS-1500 .

If the person receiving care refuses to assign benefits, Medicare can only reimburse the person receiving care instead of paying the nonparticipating provider directly.

Things to Consider Before Choosing a Provider

If you’re enrolled in Original Medicare, you have a wide range of options in terms of the providers you can use—far more than most other Americans. In most cases, your preferred doctor and other medical providers will accept assignment with Medicare, keeping your out-of-pocket costs lower than they would otherwise be, and reducing administrative hassle.

There may be circumstances, however, when the best option is a nonparticipating provider or even a provider who has opted out of Medicare altogether. If you choose one of these options, be sure you discuss the details with the provider before proceeding with the treatment.

You’ll want to understand how much is going to be billed and whether the provider will bill Medicare on your behalf if you agree to assign benefits (note that this is not possible if the provider has opted out of Medicare).

If you have supplemental coverage, you’ll also want to check with that plan to see whether it will still pick up some of the cost and, if so, how much you should expect to pay out of your own pocket.

A medical provider who accepts Medicare assignment is considered a participating provider. These providers have agreed to accept Medicare’s fee schedule as payment in full for services they provide to Medicare beneficiaries. Most doctors, hospitals, and other medical providers do accept Medicare assignment.

Nonparticipating providers are those who have not signed an agreement with Medicare to accept Medicare’s rates as payment in full. However, they can agree to accept assignment on a case-by-case basis, as long as they haven’t opted out of Medicare altogether. If they do not accept assignment, they can bill the patient up to 15% more than the Medicare-approved rate.

Providers who opt out of Medicare cannot bill Medicare and Medicare will not pay them or reimburse beneficiaries for their services. But there is no limit on how much they can bill for their services.

A Word From Verywell

It’s in your best interest to choose a provider who accepts Medicare assignment. This will keep your costs as low as possible, streamline the billing and claims process, and ensure that your Medigap plan picks up its share of the costs.

If you feel like you need help navigating the provider options or seeking care from a provider who doesn’t accept assignment, the Medicare State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) in your state may be able to help.

A doctor who does not accept Medicare assignment has not agreed to accept Medicare’s fee schedule as payment in full for their services. These doctors are considered nonparticipating with Medicare and can bill Medicare beneficiaries up to 15% more than the Medicare-approved amount.

They also have the option to accept assignment (i.e., accept Medicare’s rate as payment in full) on a case-by-case basis.

There are certain circumstances in which a provider is required by law to accept assignment. This includes situations in which the person receiving care has both Medicare and Medicaid. And it also applies to certain medical services, including lab tests, ambulance services, and drugs that are covered under Medicare Part B (as opposed to Part D).

In 2021, 98% of American physicians had participation agreements with Medicare, leaving only about 2% who did not accept assignment (either as a nonparticipating provider, or a provider who had opted out of Medicare altogether).

Accepting assignment is something that the medical provider does, whereas assignment of benefits is something that the patient (the Medicare beneficiary) does. To accept assignment means that the medical provider has agreed to accept Medicare’s approved fee as payment in full for services they provide.

Assignment of benefits means that the person receiving care agrees to allow a medical provider to bill Medicare directly, as opposed to having the person receiving care pay the provider and then seek reimbursement from Medicare.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare monthly enrollment .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Annual Medicare participation announcement .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Lower costs with assignment .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Find providers who have opted out of Medicare .

Kaiser Family Foundation. How many physicians have opted-out of the Medicare program ?

Center for Medicare Advocacy. Durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) updates .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Check the status of a claim .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare claims processing manual. Chapter 26 - completing and processing form CMS-1500 data set .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Ambulance fee schedule .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Prescription drugs (outpatient) .

By Louise Norris Louise Norris has been a licensed health insurance agent since 2003 after graduating magna cum laude from Colorado State with a BS in psychology.

• [email protected]

(888) 444-6041

What is Assignment of Benefits in Medical Billing

The health care industry has a wide network of health care insurance payers that make payments on behalf of patients having insurance plans. Without insurance plans, many patients would not be able to seek medical services. Whenever a patient visits a doctor for the treatment he/she needs to ensure that the insurance payer makes the payment for all the medical benefits he/she may have received. This is where the assignment of benefits comes in.

Definition of Assignment of Benefits

The term assignment of benefits (AOB) may be referred to as an agreement that transfers the health insurance claims benefits of the policy from the patient to the health care provider. This agreement is signed by the patient as a request to pay the designated amount to the health care provider for the health benefits he/she may have received. On the patient’s request the insurance payer makes the payment to the hospital/doctor.

Understanding of Assignment of Benefits

The assignment of benefits is generally transferred by designing a legal document— for which, the format  may vary across medical offices. This document is called the ‘Assignment of Benefits’ form. While signing the form, the patient also authorizes the insurance company to release any and all written information that is required by the hospital for reimbursement purposes. This also means that any medical billing and collection company hired by the hospital is free to use the released information for billing purposes. In addition to this, the patient agrees to appoint anyone from the hospital as a representative on his/her behalf to seek payment from the insurance payer. In other words, once the document has been signed, the patient is no longer required to deal directly with the insurance company or its representative, unless asked to do so.

It is important to note that the assignment of benefits occurs only when a claim has been successfully processed with the insurance company/payer. However, the insurance company may not always honor and accept the request for AOB. The acceptance or rejection of AOB depends on the patient’s or member’s health benefits contract and/or the State Law. Therefore all three parties— patient, health care provider, and the insurance company must stay updated with the State Law and also, review the patient’s health benefit plan thoroughly. This will help in saving time and unnecessary paperwork if the chances of the insurance company rejecting the AOB seem to be high.

Following are some providers or medical services that use AOB:

• Ambulance services.
• Ambulatory surgical center services.
• Clinical diagnostic laboratory services.
• Biological(s) and drugs.
• Home dialysis equipment and supplies.
• Physician services for patients having Medicare and Medicaid plans.
• Services of medical professionals other than a primary physician, including certified registered nurse anesthetists, clinical nurse specialists, clinical psychologists, clinical social workers, nurse midwives, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants.
• Simplified billing roster for vaccines, such as— influenza virus and pneumococcal.

AOB plays an important role in medical billing by establishing direct contact with the patient’s health care insurance payer. The purpose is to increase the chances of reimbursement and accelerate the process without contacting the patient additionally..

Popular Blog

Want to learn more about our solutions?

Connect with us.

• (888) 444 6041
• 3838 N Sam Houston Pkwy E. Suite 430 Houston, TX. 77032

Get in Touch

What is an Assignment of Benefits?

• By Chris Deleon
• Company News

At Lighthouse, our number one goal is making sure you and your family are protected, and that means knowing your rights. Learn what an Assignment of Benefits (AOB) is and how to protect yourself from AOB abuse.

An Assignment of Benefits (AOB) is a document or contract that allows a third party, other than the policyholder, to recover costs from a claim. It essentially transfers the rights to the contractor to be able to bill the insurance company. This action eliminates what would be a back-and-forth process between a policyholder and their insurance company. You might be familiar with this concept because doctors’ offices use the same document to bill health insurance companies.

Assignment of Benefit Abuse

Unfortunately, there is a rise in AOB abuse. When there is a loss associated with property, a contractor is called to perform an estimate and repair the damages. After the AOB document is signed, the contractor should contact the insurance company with the estimate, have an adjuster examine the property, and then make any necessary repairs. However, contractors looking to exploit the system can provide overstated estimates to the insurance company and start “repairing” the home before an adjuster can properly examine the property. Insurance companies end up paying exponentially more than what would have been required to make the repairs. This leaves the policyholder paying more out of pocket, increasing every policyholders’ premium, and possibly leaving incomplete repairs to the home.

How to Prevent AOB Fraud

Do research before hiring any contractor. The most frequent AOB abusers are roofers and water extraction companies. Insurance providers will have a list of qualified, licensed professionals to choose from. If you choose to hire a contractor not on the insurance company’s provided list, read the contract completely. If you don’t understand it, don’t sign it. Before hiring anyone, ask if they have an AOB clause and liability coverage.

No matter the damage, always contact your insurance company immediately, and follow their claims process .

• Healthcare Services
• Patients & Visitors
• Our Locations
• Healthcare Professionals
• Clinical Research
• Careers & Training
• Health Library

My UC Health

Billing & pricing.

• Billing Terminology

Common Billing Terminology

Advanced beneficiary notice (abn).

An Advanced Beneficiary Notice is a form advising you that tests performed by your doctor may not be covered by Medicare. The purpose of the ABN is to let you know in advance that these services may not be covered and to advise you that you will be responsible for payment of these charges.

Assignment of Benefits

Assignment of Benefits means the physician agrees to accept payment from an insurance company first and then bill the patient for any after-insurance balances. In this arrangement, the patient has assigned rights for payment, via signature, to the physician for services rendered.

Billing Statement

A summary of current activity on an account.

Birthday Rule

The Birthday Rule is endorsed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). The Birthday Rule states that the plan of the parent whose date of birth (month and day) falls earlier in the calendar year is the primary plan for dependent children. For example, if the father’s birth date is March 4 and the mother’s birth date is January 22, the mother’s plan would be primary. If both parents have the same birth date, the health plan in effect for the longer period of time will be primary.

The information billed to the insurance company for services provided.

Co-Insurance

Co-insurance is an arrangement by which the patient and the insurance company share in the payment of a service. Co-insurance takes effect after the approved deductible amount has been met. For example, assigned Medicare benefits have a 20 percent co-insurance. This means that after the approved deductible amount has been met, Medicare pays 80 percent of the approved amount and the patient, or the patient’s supplemental insurance pays the remaining 20 percent. The deductible in most cases becomes the responsibility of the patient.

Coordination of Benefits

Coordination of Benefits is the determination of benefits payable under more than one group health insurance so the insured’s total benefits do not exceed 100 percent of the medical expenses.

The portion of eligible (covered) expenses that you must pay each year before coverage begins.

Eligible Charges (Allowed Amount)

The maximum dollar amount allowed for covered services rendered by participating providers and facilities or by nonparticipating providers and facilities. Deductibles and coinsurance amounts are calculated from eligible charges. Participating providers and facilities accept this allowed amount as payment in full for covered services. Nonparticipating providers and facilities may not accept this amount as payment in full for covered services.

Evidence of Coverage (EOC)

A written guide from your health plan that explains what the plan does and does not cover and the rules you must follow for getting care.

Explanation of Benefits (EOB)

A statement provided to the insured by an insurance company explaining how the claim was processed.

Flexible Spending Account

A short-term savings account that lets you set aside pre-tax income and use it to pay for health care or child care during the year.

The person responsible for paying the bill.

Insurance Deductible

An insurance deductible is a minimum amount the patient must pay before the insurance company will pay anything toward charges. Usually the deductible needs to be met and paid by the patient each year.

Insurance Copay

An insurance copay is the amount of money or percent of charges for Basic or Supplemental Health Services that a member is required to pay, as set forth by their health plan. This is often associated with an office visit or emergency room visit. For example $5, $10 or $25.

Non-Participation

Non-participation means the physician does not participate in the patient’s health plan; therefore, the patient is billed directly for services and is responsible for payment in full.

Open Enrollment

The period each year during which you can join a plan or change plans if your employer offers more than one plan.

Out-of-Pocket Maximum

The total amount of eligible charges each year payable by insured directly to providers or facilities; 100 percent of eligible charges will be paid during the remainder of the year once the applicable out of pocket maximum is satisfied.

A third-party entity (commercial or government insurance carriers) that pays medical claims.

Physician Participation

Physician participation is a method by which a physician agrees to accept an insurance company’s payment level as payment in full. The bill is sent directly to the insurance company with payment made directly to the physician. This excludes amounts considered patient obligation under the patient’s coverage plan. For example, co-insurance, deductibles, and non-covered services would still have to be paid by the patient.

Pre-Approval

Permission from your medical group or health plan to get a service that requires a referral from your doctor. Also called authorization or prior-authorization.

Pre-existing condition

An illness or injury you have before you join a health plan.

What your health plan charges each month to maintain your health care coverage.

Primary Insurance

The insurance primarily responsible for the payment of the claim.

Prior Authorization/Precertification

A formal approval obtained from the insurance company prior to delivery of medical services.

Secondary Insurance

The insurance responsible for processing the claim after the primary insurance determination of benefits.

The person who holds and/or is responsible for the medical insurance policy.

Supplemental Insurance

An additional insurance policy that processes claims after Medicare reimbursement.

Yearly Deductible

The amount you must pay each year before your health plan starts to pay. Also called annual deductible.

Yearly Out-of-Pocket Maximum

The most you have to pay for most health care services in a year. In some cases, you may still have to pay copays for some services.

Financial Services

• Health Plan Accepted
• Your Responsibilities
• Patient Billing Frequently Asked Questions
• Insurance Billing Frequently Asked Questions
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Ayuda Financiera (En Español)
• Financial Assistance Frequently Asked Questions
• UC Health Pricing Flyer
• Understanding Healthcare Prices
• Avoiding Surprises in Your Medical Bills
• Surprise Billing Disclosure
• Understanding Your Statement
• Global Payment FAQ

UC Health Patient Financial Services 3200 Burnet Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45229 513-585-6200 800-277-0781 [email protected]

Payment Mailing Address UC Health P.O. Box 630911 Cincinnati, OH 45263-0911

• About UC Health
• College of Medicine
• Sponsorships
• Transition of Care
• UC Health Foundation
• Joint Commission Accreditation

Quick Links

• Employees & Staff
• News / Media
• Classes and Events
• Billing & Pricing
• Supplier Diversity & Community Engagement
• Notice of Privacy Practices
• UC Health Code of Conduct
• Non-Discrimination Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Terms & Conditions

Connect With Us

Access your medical records online, anytime.

My UC Health gives you access to portions of your electronic medical record (EMR) on a secure server.

Click to get started.

Social Security

Program operations manual system (poms).

TN 35 (04-14)

GN 02410.001 Assignment of Benefits

A.  protection from assignment of benefits.

Sections 207 and 1631(d)(1) of the Social Security Act (the Act) prohibit “transfer” or “assignment” of a beneficiary or recipient’s right to future payment under title II and title XVI respectively. These sections of the Act prohibit the transfer of control over money to someone other than the beneficiary, recipient, or the representative payee. These sections also protect the beneficiary or recipient's right to receive payments directly, and to choose how to use the payments.

Our responsibility for protecting payments against legal process and assignment ends when we pay the beneficiary or recipient. However, once paid, Sections 207 and 1631(d)(1) of the Act continue to protect payments as long as we can identify them as:

Retirement, Survivors and Disability Insurance (RSDI) benefits; or

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments.

For example, this would include a situation in which RSDI or SSI payments are the only direct deposit payments in the account.

A beneficiary or recipient can use Sec. 207 or 1631(d)(1) of the Act as a personal defense if ordered to pay his or her payments to someone else, or if his or her payments are ordered to be taken by legal process.

B.  Exceptions to protection from assignment of benefits

Laws may create exceptions to the protections provided under Sec. 207 and 1631 of the Act, but only if they explicitly identify the applicable section, either Sec. 207 or 1631 (also found in the United States Code as 42 USC 407 or 42 USC 1383), and provide that the law applies despite that section. So far, Congress has authorized the following exceptions to Sec. 207 and 1631 of the Act.

1.  Garnishment of benefit payments for child support or alimony

Garnishment is the legal process of withholding an amount from money owed to a person in order to pay off the person’s debt to another. Under Sec.459 of the Act (42 USC 659), garnishment of benefit payments for the purpose of collecting amounts owed for child support or alimony is permitted. For policy on garnishment of title II benefits, see GN 02410.200 through GN 02410.225 .

2.  Garnishment of benefit payments for victim restitution

Garnishment of benefit payments to recover court-ordered victim restitution is permitted under 18 USC 3613(a), 3663, 3663A, and 3664. For policy on garnishment for court-ordered victim restitution, see GN 02410.223 .

3.  Levy for unpaid federal taxes

Levy is the legal seizure of property, such as Social Security benefit payments, to recover a debt. The IRS places a levy on benefit payments to recover unpaid federal taxes under 26 USC 6331 and 6334. For policy on IRS levy, see GN 02410.100 .

C.  Fees and automatic withdrawals

State or Federal government guidelines do not regulate financial institution (FI) fees. These fees are a matter of contract between banks and their customers. Customary fees outlined in account contracts with FIs, and the automatic withdrawal of these fees, do not constitute an assignment of benefits. For a definition of an acceptable FI, see GN 02402.030 .

1.  Financial institution

The following banking options meet Treasury’s definition of an acceptable FI:

Savings and loan associations,

Credit unions, or

Thrift institutions.

For policy on acceptable financial institutions, see GN 02402.030 .

NOTE : A master sub-account is an account at an FI established to receive deposits on behalf of a group of individuals. Sub-accounts are then set up at the same FI, another FI, or on the individual ledgers maintained by the master account holder. An acceptable master sub-account relationship is not an assignment of benefits. For policy on acceptable master sub-account relationships, see GN 02402.050 .

2.  Account fees

We do not prohibit automatic withholding of account fees from accounts holding SSA payments when those fees are customary to accounts with the FI.

A fee is “customary” if it is consistent with fees associated with similar accounts at the FI and the same fees apply to both federal and non-federal deposits.

NOTE : We should question fees that apply only to federal payments. If the FI applies different fees to federal and similar non-federal deposits, send the issue in question to the Regional Office (RO).

3.  Pre-authorized withdrawals

A beneficiary recipient, or his or her representative payee, may pre-authorize an FI, or other entity, to withdraw funds from his or her account for a wide variety of purposes (e.g., utility bills, mortgage payments, loan repayments, investments, nursing home fees, etc.). Once the beneficiary recipient, or his or her representative payee, establishes control by receipt and deposit of the payment, these arrangements are allowed, provided they can be terminated at any time. Terminating the arrangement does not mean terminating or canceling the debt. It means that the beneficiary recipient, or his or her representative payee, may terminate the pre-authorized withdrawal arrangement as a method for paying the debt. The right to receive and to choose how to use those payments exists if the beneficiary recipient, or his or her representative payee, can freely terminate this arrangement. If a beneficiary recipient, or his or her representative payee, cannot freely revoke the pre-authorized withdrawal, send the issue in question to the RO.

D.  Prohibited arrangements versus acceptable relationships

The beneficiary recipient’s, or his or her representative payee’s, control of the receipt and use of payments will determine if a payment arrangement is prohibited or acceptable.

1.  Prohibited arrangements

A.  payment to the wrong person.

Do not make payment to any person or entity other than the beneficiary recipient, or his or her representative payee, except as outlined in GN 02410.001B and GN 02410.001C in this section. This prohibition applies regardless of the person or entity who makes the request.

For example, the prohibition applies when:

a beneficiary or recipient requests that we pay his or her payments to someone other than the beneficiary or the beneficiary’s representative payee.

a court orders SSA to make payment to a party other than the beneficiary or recipient, unless one of the specific exceptions in GN 02410.001B in this section exists. For policy on when SSA should not comply with a bankruptcy court’s order to pay benefits to a bankruptcy trustee, see GN 02410.005 .

When you are unable to determine whether there is a prohibited arrangement, send the issue in question to the RO.

b.  Other prohibited arrangements

Even if the payment goes directly to the beneficiary or recipient (or the representative payee), the arrangement may is prohibited if the beneficiary or recipient surrenders control of the payments. Avoid any arrangement where the beneficiary or recipient surrenders or shares control of payments with a person or entity that has an interest in charging or collecting money from the beneficiary or recipient.

Avoid the following situations:

Do not approve sending a payment, either by check or electronically, to a loan company where the beneficiary or recipient has a loan, or to a party holding the beneficiary or recipient's power of attorney. For information on power of attorney, see GN 02410.010 .

Do not approve a bank account when the attorney or non-attorney representative has the power to withdraw funds so that representative’s fees can be collected directly from that beneficiary or recipient’s account. See the note in GN 03920.025A . For policy on unacceptable requests for direct deposit, see GN 02402.085 .

In both scenarios given, the arrangement is prohibited because the beneficiary or recipient surrenders control over the payment.

When you are unsure of a prohibited arrangement, send the issue in question to the RO.

2.  Acceptable relationships

A.  third-party repayment.

Third parties may employ representatives to ensure that beneficiaries or recipients repay debts owed to the third parties immediately after the beneficiary or recipient starts to receive payment. This arrangement is acceptable if:

The third-party representative has no financial interest in the beneficiary or recipient’s direct deposit account (i.e., he is not named on the account and has no authority to direct the money in the account);

The third party representative is not charging the beneficiary or recipient a fee;

The beneficiary or recipient pre-authorizes, (according to the financial institution’s policy), a withdrawal of funds from his account to repay a debt to a third party;

The third-party representative did not obtain the pre-authorization from the beneficiary or recipient through deceit, coercion, or intimidation; and

The third-party representative gets oral or written confirmation from the beneficiary or recipient of the pre-authorization to withdraw the money from the account after we deposit funds into the beneficiary or recipient’s account and before a transfer of funds to pay the third party debt.

NOTE : Confirmation is necessary because a beneficiary or recipient may have signed the pre-authorization before learning whether he or she will receive benefits and the amount of past-due benefits he or she will receive. In this situation, confirmation prevents the third party from taking funds before the beneficiary or recipient exercises control over the funds.

b.  Financial institution-electronic funds distributor (FI-EFD) accounts

Some FI have established Electronic Funds Distributor (EFD) relationships with various check cashing establishments to receive and distribute monthly direct deposit payments to assist SSA beneficiaries or recipients who do not have traditional bank accounts.

The FI receives the monthly payment by direct deposit titled under the beneficiary or recipient’s name. Then, the FI electronically transfers payment to the contracted EFD. The EFD, acting as an agent of the FI, will then release the monthly payment to the account holder in the form of a cashier’s check.

These FI-EFD accounts are acceptable and not prohibited if they meet the following requirements:

The FI must be acceptable under United States Treasury guidelines. (For policy on acceptable types of financial institutions, see GN 02402.030A .)

The EFD must have a contract with and act as an agent of the FI.

The FI account must be acceptable as outlined in GN 02402.030 B.1 .

A secondary contract relationship that attaches the FI-EFD transaction account as collateral for loan fees associated with the EFD cannot exist as a requirement for participation between the EFD and the beneficiary or recipient.

No person or entity can have control over the receipt, or use of, SSA benefit payments other than the beneficiary or his or her representative payee. (For Assignment of Benefits, see GN 02410.001 and Sec.1631 (d)(1).)

The beneficiary, recipient, or representative payee may cancel his or her FI-EFD direct deposit arrangement at any time.

Fees associated with the account must be customary to fees for similar accounts at the FI and those fees are outlined in the FI-customer contract.

When you are unable to clearly determine whether an FI-EFD account is acceptable, send the issue in question to the RO.

E.  Examples of acceptable and prohibited relationships

1.  acceptable relationship.

A company pays long-term disability (LTD) benefits to a customer and requires them to file for Social Security title II benefits. When the Social Security claim is allowed, the amount of Social Security benefits received offsets the LTD benefit amount. As an incentive to induce the LTD insurer to refer claimants, the claimant’s LTD representative offers to assist the insurer with recovering the overpayment the insurer made to the claimant. The LTD representative does not charge the claimant a fee for this service. The LTD representative also makes it clear to the claimant that he or she may pay the LTD directly and does not have to pay the LTD through the representative.

At the LTD representative’s request, the claimant gives the representative pre-authorization to withdraw funds from the claimant’s bank account if SSA approves the claim and issues the claimant past-due benefits.

After we approve the claim and deposit the past-due benefits into the claimant’s account, the LTD representative gets oral authorization (in addition to the pre-authorization) to transfer those funds to the LTD insurer to satisfy the LTD overpayment. The LTD representative also documents the oral authorization. We will accept this arrangement. The beneficiary is exercising control over the past-due benefits deposited into his or her account before the pre-authorized transfer of funds, and the beneficiary understands that he or she could have elected to pay the LTD directly. The LTD provider does not receive a fee from the beneficiary and obtains a pre-authorization to transfer funds from the beneficiary’s account in order to repay the third party (i.e., the overpayment of payments from the insurer). The LTD representative also gets authorization after deposit of the SSA benefit payment into the beneficiary’s account. For policy on acceptable third-party repayment arrangements, see GN 02410.001D.2.a. , in this section.

b.  Master sub-account

Comfort Nursing Home maintains a master sub-account titled “Comfort Nursing Home Patients' Accounts” at New State Bank for the convenience of its residents. The nursing home sets up a separate sub-account for each resident. Residents sign agreements for the nursing home to withdraw monthly amounts for care costs. Residents can withdraw any amount, up to the balance in their accounts for personal expenses and they have the right to terminate the account at any time. The nursing home keeps track of all deposits and withdrawals. This is an acceptable master sub-account. For policy on acceptable master sub-accounts with FI, see GN 02402.050 .

c.  FI-EFD

Big Bucks Bank Inc. (BBB) is an accepted FI. BBB offers the “We-Pay-U” program for customers without traditional bank accounts. We-Pay-U program customers sign a contract and establish a non-interest bearing account with BBB for the sole purpose of electronic transfer of federal or non-federal monthly payments to that account. Beneficiaries or recipients can then receive their SSA payments in the form of a cashier's check from Brown Bear Check Cashing. Brown Bear Check Cashing acts as an agent of BBB and must adhere to the rules and regulations of BBB in relation to the We-Pay-U account. The We-Pay-U customer agrees to a monthly processing fee associated with the We-Pay-U account, which BBB withdraws from their payment automatically. This is an acceptable relationship. The beneficiary or recipient has established control of their payment and the fees associated with the We-Pay-U program. Because the account fees in the contract apply to both federal and non-federal monthly payments, we consider them customary to the BBB account. For policy on acceptable FI-EFD arrangements, see GN 02410.001D.2.b. in this section.

2.  Prohibited arrangement

A beneficiary or recipient has appointed an attorney representative to help him in proceedings before SSA. SSA is not paying an attorney fee directly to the representative. The beneficiary or recipient establishes a checking account in his or her own name that requires the signature of both the beneficiary or recipient and the attorney on checks written to withdraw funds from the account. The beneficiary or recipient requests direct deposit of his or her payments to that account. This is a prohibited arrangement because the beneficiary or recipient has given control of access to payments to the attorney representative. See the following references for additional information:

For policy on Who is a Representative, see GN 03910.020 .

For policy on representative’s fees in trust or escrow accounts, see GN 03920.025 .

For policy on acceptable types of financial institutions and accounts, see GN 02402.030 .

For policy on payment to the wrong person, see GN 02410.001D.1. , in this section.

F.  References

GN 02402.030 Acceptable Types of Financial Institutions and Accounts

GN 02402.050 Account Titles

GN 02402.085 Unacceptable Requests for Direct Deposit

GN 03910.020 Who Is a Representative

GN 03920.017 Payment of Representative's Fee

GN 03920.025 Representative's Fee - Trust or Escrow Accounts

Advertisement

Supported by

Trump’s Bond in Civil Fraud Case Is Reduced to $175 Million

The former president was racing to secure a half-billion-dollar bond, but an appeals court lowered the amount. The surprise decision may help him stave off financial disaster.

• Share full article

By Ben Protess and William K. Rashbaum

With Donald J. Trump on the clock to secure a nearly half-billion-dollar bond in his civil fraud case, a New York appeals court handed the former president a lifeline on Monday, saying it would accept a far smaller bond of $175 million.

The ruling by a panel of five appellate court judges was a crucial and unexpected victory for Mr. Trump, potentially staving off a looming financial disaster. Had the court denied his request for a smaller bond in the fraud case, which was brought by the New York attorney general, Mr. Trump risked losing control over his bank accounts and even some of his marquee properties.

For now, those dire outcomes might be on hold. If Mr. Trump obtains the smaller bond, it will prevent the attorney general from collecting while he appeals the $454 million judgment against him. The appeal in the case, in which a trial judge found that Mr. Trump fraudulently inflated his net worth, could take months or longer to resolve.

Mr. Trump has 10 days to secure the bond, and two people with knowledge of his finances said he should be able to, though doing so will effectively drain much of his cash. In order to obtain the bond — a promise from an outside company that it will cover his judgment if he ultimately loses the appeal and cannot pay — Mr. Trump will have to pay the company a fee and pledge about $200 million in cash and other investments as collateral.

Read the Ruling Lowering Trump’s Bond in the Civil Fraud Case

In a statement, Mr. Trump said he would “abide by the decision” and either post a bond or put up the money himself. He added that the appellate court’s decision to reduce the bond “shows how ridiculous and outrageous” the $454 million judgment against him is.

While the court, the Appellate Division in Manhattan, did not rule directly on the merits of Mr. Trump’s appeal, its ruling suggests that some of the judges could be sympathetic to Mr. Trump’s case, legal experts said.

But the decision in Mr. Trump’s favor was eclipsed only an hour later by a decision against him in one of his four criminal cases , underscoring the remarkable breadth of his legal problems as he seeks to reclaim the White House. In his Manhattan criminal case, the judge finalized an April 15 trial date, rejecting the former president’s effort to delay.

In the civil fraud case, Mr. Trump’s lawyers had asked the appeals court to either accept a smaller bond or pause the bond requirement altogether. They argued that the court would be likely to overturn the $454 million penalty, contending that it was “grossly disproportionate and unconstitutional.”

A spokeswoman for the attorney general, Letitia James, noted that Mr. Trump was “still facing accountability for his staggering fraud” and that the judgment “still stands.”

But Mr. Trump’s legal team celebrated the ruling. “The ruling today represents a great first step towards the ultimate reversal of a baseless and reckless judgment,” said Christopher M. Kise, one of his lawyers.

Mr. Trump has repeatedly attacked Ms. James and the trial judge, Arthur F. Engoron , as politically biased Democrats leading a witch hunt against him.

After Monday’s hearing, Mr. Trump held a news conference at 40 Wall Street, a crucial property in his portfolio and one that Ms. James signaled her intent to seize if Mr. Trump did not post bond.

Mr. Trump once again made broad assertions that the legal system was being weaponized by his political opponents, accusing Ms. James, Justice Engoron and the prosecutors in his criminal cases of trying to “take as much of his money as possible.”

Justice Engoron found Mr. Trump liable last month for conspiring to inflate his net worth to reap financial benefits, including favorable loans from banks. The $454 million judgment reflected the interest payments Mr. Trump saved by misleading his lenders, as well as profits from the recent sale of two properties.

Justice Engoron imposed several restrictions on Mr. Trump and his family business, barring him from running a New York company and obtaining a loan from a New York bank for three years. The same restrictions apply to his adult sons for two years. The judge also extended the appointment of an independent monitor, a watchful outsider to keep an eye on the family business.

In a surprise move, the appeals court on Monday paused most of those restrictions, save for the monitor.

Mr. Trump is fighting all of the punishments, but it was the financial penalty that he feared the most.

To secure the full $454 million bond, he would have needed to pledge even more than that — about $557 million, his lawyers said — in collateral to a bond company, including as much cash as possible and stocks and bonds he could sell quickly. He would have also owed the bond company a fee that could have amounted to nearly $20 million.

In a recent court filing, Mr. Trump’s lawyers called securing a bond for the full amount a “practical impossibility,” and revealed that he had approached more than 30 bond companies to no avail.

The reason was clear: Much of Mr. Trump’s wealth is tied up in the value of his real estate, which bond companies rarely accept as collateral. A recent New York Times analysis found that Mr. Trump had more than $350 million in cash as well as stocks and bonds, far short of the $557 million he would have needed to post in collateral.

He did, however, have enough collateral to recently post a $91.6 million bond in the defamation case he lost to E. Jean Carroll. And he appears to have enough to secure a $175 million bond in the case brought by Ms. James.

Still, doing so will eat into much of his stockpile of cash and other liquid investments. So long as Mr. Trump has to pledge money as collateral, he cannot use it to fund his family business or presidential campaign.

While the bond does not represent a fatal threat to the Trump Organization, it could curb any hope the company has of growing and effectively reduce Mr. Trump’s net worth.

But it could have been worse. Without a bond, Ms. James could have wielded broad authority to freeze various bank accounts, and she could have begun the long, complicated process of trying to seize some of Mr. Trump’s buildings, including an estate in Westchester County.

This was an alarming prospect for Mr. Trump , whose identity is linked to his properties. In a social media post on Monday, Mr. Trump referred to them as “my babies.”

It is unclear whether these same five judges will also hear Mr. Trump’s appeal, but David B. Saxe, a former judge on the appeals court that ruled on Monday, said that the court’s decision to short-circuit Ms. James’s collection efforts suggests that some of the judges were uncomfortable with Justice Engoron’s ruling.

“My view is that the court indicates it has difficulty with the breadth of the lower court’s decision,” said Mr. Saxe, who retired in 2017 after 36 years on the bench, 19 of them on the appeals court.

“They had other options available to them, and they issued a broad-based stay,” he continued, which he said suggests “that there is a view that they’re going to need to take a hard look at the lower court’s decision.”

Michael Gold contributed reporting.

Ben Protess is an investigative reporter at The Times, writing about public corruption. He has been covering the various criminal investigations into former President Trump and his allies. More about Ben Protess

William K. Rashbaum is a senior writer on the Metro desk, where he covers political and municipal corruption, courts, terrorism and law enforcement. He was a part of the team awarded the 2009 Pulitzer Prize for Breaking News. More about William K. Rashbaum