how to counter argue in an essay

Academic Success / Academic Support / Academic Writing / Online Writing Instruction / Research Writing / teacher resources / Teaching / Teaching college writing

How to Write Effective Counterarguments

by Kayla Beebout · Published June 7, 2024 · Updated June 6, 2024

If you do not see the podcast player, click here to listen.

Some of the most common questions writers have when starting an argumentative essay are, “Why—and how—am I supposed to address counterarguments?” Counterarguments, also called rival hypotheses, are opinions that contradict an essay’s thesis. So why talk about them? Well, Nussbaum and Schraw (2007) called argument and counterargument “a jigsaw puzzle” (p. 60). Puzzles are not complete without every piece in the box. If an argumentative essay is a puzzle, it will be missing something without counterarguments.

How do writers find and organize these puzzle pieces? First, it is important to find quality research. Al Bulushi (2022) suggested counterarguments work best when taken from sources with an opposing point of view. For example, writers arguing that dogs make better pets than lizards should not cite a counterargument discussed by someone who also prefers dogs. Instead, they should look for authors who prefer lizards. The Purdue Global Library has an extensive online database of scholarly books and articles, which can be a good place to find research.

The next issue to tackle is where to place a counterargument. One of the most common areas is right before the conclusion. The Harvard College Writing Center (n.d.) said this can be a good way to address a reader’s doubts after they have digested the rest of the argument. However, as they also argued, counterarguments can be placed anywhere. As always, we at the Purdue Global Writing Center advise reviewing assignment directions and rubrics for guidance, but a paragraph before the conclusion can be a good default if it is difficult to determine where to start.

Once a writer collects sources and decides where to place them, it is time to write. It is important to present opposing opinions fairly by acknowledging they may have a point (The Writing Center, n.d.). After all, counterarguments are not meant to claim there is only one answer to a question or problem. Instead, they demonstrate that one of many answers may be more effective—and why. Providing a fair analysis of other opinions will show that the writer has thought through other perspectives before arguing their own.

Fair analysis also means not dismissing or attacking others’ views. This is an easy mistake to make. Even if a writer acknowledges that other opinions have merit, using a dismissive tone will cause readers to be less open to the essay’s thesis. Argumentative essays are supposed to remain scholarly and unbiased at all times so they retain credibility.

Credibility also involves using the correct interpretation of source materials. When citing research, do not refute something the author did not say. This means writers need to fully understand counterarguments so they do not misrepresent opposing views. An essay that misunderstands its research is going to lose readers’ interest quickly.

Now, it is time to put all of this into practice. Here are some examples of effective and ineffective counterarguments using fictional sources about whether pineapple belongs on pizza.

Effective: Critics may argue that pineapple is too sweet to use as a pizza topping. As Smith (2020) stated, pizza is designed to be a meal, meaning that it should be savory. Most meals consist of savory food. Hamburgers, pasta, and sandwiches are generally considered savory. However, combining sweet and savory flavors can add interest to a meal. Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, for example, have both of these components. Discarding pineapples based on their sweetness alone could cause pizza enthusiasts to go without a potentially taste-broadening experience.

This counterargument is effective because it cites an opposing opinion, admits that it may have merit, and presents an argument that the essay’s thesis is still more valuable.

Ineffective: Some authors maintain that pineapple does belong on pizza due to its addition of sweetness to a taste profile. Richards (2022) used peanut butter and jelly sandwiches as another example of this flavor combination and called pineapple on pizza a “taste-broadening experience” (p. 7). Although this can be true, pineapple on pizza is very different from peanut butter and jelly, so this comparison is ridiculous.

This counterargument discussion started well. The writer talked about an alternate opinion and cited research. They even admitted the point about sweet and savory combinations could be valid. However, once the writer called the source “ridiculous,” they veered into attack rather than unbiased analysis.

Ineffective: Aesthetic or textural concerns regarding pineapple could be part of connoisseurs’ aversion to it. Smith (2020) argued that pizza consumption should be a “smooth, well-rounded tasting experience” (p. 10), which pineapple can disrupt. Pineapples do not change the shape of a pizza, and they are no less smooth than other common pizza toppings like sausage. Therefore, pineapple does not seem to disrupt normal textural and aesthetic experiences.

This passage does not interpret source material correctly. The writer has taken the adjectives “smooth” and “well-rounded” literally, thinking Smith wants pizzas to be round in shape and smooth in texture. However, since the word “tasting” is in the quote, Smith likely was writing figuratively to argue unexpected or jarring flavors do not belong in a pizza.

These examples will hopefully make counterargument skills seem more concrete. But are these skills useful in other contexts? Counterarguments are important outside the classroom as well. Knowing how to consider other points of view makes it easier to live in a diverse world (Al Bulushi, 2022). People have different opinions all the time. Considering them with an open mind opens doors to conversations instead of arguments, which seems like a great way to handle awkward family political discussions as well as problem and solution papers!

Al Bulushi, Z. (2022). Source choice and use in counterargument writing. TESOL Journal , 13 (2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.646

Harvard College Writing Center (n.d.). Counterargument . Harvard University. https://writingcenter.fas.harvard.edu/counterargument

Nussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students’ writing. Journal of Experimental Education , 76 (1), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.76.1.59-92

The Writing Center (n.d.). All about counterarguments . George Mason University. https://writingcenter.gmu.edu/writing-resources/general-writing-practices/all-about-counterarguments

25 Counterargument Examples

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

Learn about our Editorial Process

counterargument examples and definition, explained below

A counterargument is a response, rebuttal, or refutation of an argument with your own argument. Its purpose is to oppose and disprove a theory that someone else has put forward.

We use counterarguments extensively in debates as well as argumentative essay writing.

When teaching essay writing, I teach my students to always present counterarguments to their opponents’ points of view. This helps them to strengthen their own argument and demonstrate awareness of potential rebuttals.

Below are some methods, with examples, that could be used – be it in essay writing, debates, or any other communication genre.

Counterargument Examples

1. empirical challenges.

An empirical challenge is, simply, a rebuttal that challenges the facts presented by the opponent, showing that their facts are wrong and yours are right.

To undermine your opponent’s set of facts, it will be your job to present facts that show that the opponent’s supposed facts are wrong, perhaps due to misreading data or cherry-picking.

Then, you would need to present concrete information, data, or evidence that negates the claim or conclusion of an opponent’s argument.

The core strength of empirical challenges is in their reliance on hard facts and numbers, which are difficult to refute without equally credible opposing data.

Example of Empirical Challenge: If your opponent argues that global warming isn’t a serious issue, an empirical challenge would be to provide scientific data or research studies showing the increase in global temperatures and the harmful effects.

2. Challenging the Relevance

Challenging the relevance means questioning whether your opponent’s argument or perspective is applicable to the discussion at hand.

This sort of counter-argument seeks to destabilize your opponent’s view by showing that, while their facts or arguments might be sound in isolation, they do not bear any relation to, or are unfit for, the topic at hand, making them irrelevant.

The power of relevance challenge lays in its ability to destabilize your opponent’s argument without needing to directly dispute the truth of their claims.

Example of Challenging the Relevance: You will often find this argument when comparing the usefulness of various research methodologies for a research project. Multiple research methods may be valid, but there’s likely one that’s best for any given study.

3. Reductio ad absurdum

Reductio ad absurdum is a latin term that means reducing to the absurd . This method involves demonstrating the absurdity of an opponent’s argument by showing its illogical or extreme consequences.

The goal is to show that if the argument were valid, it would inevitably lead to senseless or ridiculous outcomes.

The application of reductio ad absurdum is especially effective in debates or discussions where flawed logic or hyperbolic statements are used to influence the audience’s opinion, as it discredits the credibility of the other person’s argument.

Example of Reductio ad absurdum : Consider a scenario where someone argues for the total removal of all regulations on vehicle speed to improve the efficiency of transportation. You can counter this argument through reductio ad absurdum by stating, “By that logic, let’s allow cars to travel at 200 miles per hour down residential streets. After all, it would make the mail delivery much faster!” It becomes evident that permitting extremely high speeds could lead to dangerous conditions and potential for disastrous accidents.

4. Pointing Out Logical Fallacies

The strategy of pointing out logical fallacies involves identifying and highlighting flaws in your opponent’s reasoning.

In a debate or discussion, logical fallacies are often subtle errors that lead to invalid conclusions or arguments.

By identifying these fallacies, you avoid being swayed by flawed reasoning and instead promote cognizant, logical thought.

Successful use of this strategy requires a good understanding of the different kinds of logical fallacies , such as straw man fallacies, ad hominem attacks, and appeals to ignorance.

Example of Pointing Out Logical Fallacies: Consider an argument where your opponent asserts, “All cats I’ve ever seen have been aloof, so all cats must be aloof.” This is a hasty generalization fallacy, where a conclusion about all members of a group is drawn from inadequate sample size.

5. Counterexamples

A counterexample is an example that opposes or contradicts an argument or theory proposed by another.

The use of a counterexample is a practical and powerful means of rebutting an argument or theory that has been presented as absolute or universally applicable.

When you provide a singular example that contradicts your opponent’s proposed theory, it demonstrates the theory isn’t universally true and therefore, weakens their argument.

However, this tactic requires sound knowledge and a good command of subject matter to be able to identify and present valid exceptions.

Example of Counterexamples: Consider an argument where someone states that “Mammals can’t lay eggs.” A solid counterexample would be the platypus, a mammal that does lay eggs. This single example is sufficient to contradict the universal claim.

6. Using Hypotheticals

Hypothetical situations, in essence, are imagined scenarios used to refute your opponent’s point of view. It’s, in essence, an example that is plausible, but not real.

Using hypotheticals assists in clarifying the ramifications of a particular argument, policy, or theory. When a hypothetical scenario effectively illustrates the flaws or shortcomings of your opponent’s viewpoint, it can completely unsettle their position.

However, care must be taken to frame the hypotheticals reasonably and realistically, lest they distort the argument or derail the conversation.

Example of Using Hypotheticals: If someone argues that raising the minimum wage will lead to job loss, you could counter with a hypothetical that if businesses paid their employees more, those employees would have more spending power, bolstering the economy and creating more jobs.

7. Comparison and Contrast

Comparison and contrast entails directly comparing your argument to your opponent’s, showing the strength of your perspective and the weakness of the opponent’s.

This tool allows you to support your arguments or disprove your opponent’s by using existing examples or situations that illustrate your point clearly.

The technique relies heavily on the logical thinking of comparing two or more entities in a manner that is informative, convincing, and significant to the argument.

Example of Comparison and Contrast: Let’s say, for instance, you are arguing against privatization of public utilities. You could compare the rates and services of private utilities to those of public ones showing that private companies often charge more for the same services, thereby supporting your argument against privatization.

See More: Compare and Contrast Examples

8. Challenging Biases

Challenging biases involves questioning the objectivity of your opponent’s argument by pointing out the predispositions that may influence their perspective.

Biases can greatly affect the validity and reliability of an argument because they can skew the interpretation of information and hinder fair judgement.

By challenging biases, you can expose the partiality in your opponent’s argument, thereby diminishing its credibility and persuasiveness.

However, it’s important to respectfully and tactfully challenge biases to prevent the discussion from turning into a personal attack.

Example of Challenging Biases: If your opponent is a staunch supporter of a political party and they provide an argument that solely favors this party, you could challenge their bias by questioning whether their support for the party is unduly influencing their viewpoint, hence the need for them to consider the opposing perspectives.

See More: List of Different Biases

9. Ethical Dispute

Ethical disputes involve challenging your opponent’s argument based on moral values or principles.

Ethics play a crucial role in shaping people’s beliefs, attitudes, and actions. Therefore, ethical disputes can serve as powerful counterarguments, especially in debates concerning sensitive or controversial topics.

If your opponent’s position contradicts generally accepted ethical norms or values, you can point this out to weaken their argument.

Just remember, ethics can occasionally be subjective and personal, so it’s important to approach ethical disputes with sensitivity and respect.

Example of Ethical Dispute: If your opponent supports factory farming based on economic benefits, you could challenge their argument by pointing out the ethical issues related to animal welfare and the environment.

10. Challenging the Source

Challenging the source is a tactic used to question the credibility or reliability of the information used by your opponent in their argument.

This technique focuses on examining the origin of the evidence presented, probing whether the source is credible, trusted, and free from bias.

To do this, I recommend using this media literacy framework .

If the source used by your opponent is flawed, biased or unreliable, their argument loses credibility, making your position stronger.

Example of Challenging the Source: If your opponent uses an obscure blog as their primary source of their argument on a scientific topic, you could challenge the source by questioning its credibility and offering information from reputable scientific journals instead.

See More: Good Sources for Essay Writing

A Full List of Methods for Counterargument

Empirical challenges
Challenging the relevance
Reductio ad absurdum
Pointing out logical fallacies
Counterexamples
Using hypotheticals
Comparison and contrast
Challenging biases
Ethical dispute
Challenging the source
Questioning assumptions
Slippery slope argument
Challenging a false dichtomy
Historical Precedent
Anecdotal Evidence
Challenging the Definition
Socratic Questioning
Highlighting Unintended Consequences
Appeal to Emotion
Challenging the Frame
Highlighting Inconsistencies
Challenging Completeness
Temporal Challenge
Offering alternative explanations
Exposing oversimplifications
Appeal to authority

Counterargument is an essential skill for debaters and essay writers. You need to be able to know and understand strategies for countering the arguments of your opponents to position your argument in the best light possible. To do this, we have to vectors of attack: First, you can undermine their arguments and demonstrate the flaws. Second, you can present your argument as stronger.

The key, however, is to ensure your arguments are as airtight and foolproof as possible to prevent effective rebuttals to your own counterarguments!

Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 10 Reasons you’re Perpetually Single
Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 20 Montessori Toddler Bedrooms (Design Inspiration)
Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 21 Montessori Homeschool Setups
Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 101 Hidden Talents Examples

How To Write A Counter Argument in an Essay | Meaning, Examples & Purpose

September 11, 2024
Uncategorized

Table of Contents Hide

What is a counter argument, what is the aim of a counter argument, 1. refutation, 2. concession, how to write a counterargument, what is included in a counterargument paragraph, common mistakes to avoid while writing counterarguments, example of a counterargument, faqs on how to write a counterargument, we also recommend.

A counter-argument is a perspective or point of view that contradicts or refutes the opposing argument presented in a persuasive essay, usually to win a debate.

A counterargument makes an essay more persuasive because it shows that the writer has considered multiple sides of the issue and can also help to support their own claim by addressing other opinions.

In this post, we’ll break down everything you need to know about writing a counterargument in an essay. We’ll explore its meaning, share practical examples, and explain why it’s an important part of effective essay writing.

A counterargument is a contrasting or opposing viewpoint. Counterarguments are common in persuasive writing . In argumentation, you strive to persuade an audience of your claim. Claims represent the writer’s major ideas and perspective. In an argumentative essay, you want the readers to believe your claim. To persuade your audience of your claim’s validity, provide evidence-based reasoning.

The counterargument is the opposing viewpoint to the one you are writing about. Include counterarguments in your writing to create a response. In a rebuttal, you explain why your position is stronger than the counterargument.

When adding counterarguments to your essay, you must understand their assertions and reasoning. For example, in an essay on whether teachers should assign homework, you argue that they should not. The counterargument is that teachers should offer homework.

Related Post: How To Write A Counterclaim Like a Pro in Argumentative Writing

There are numerous reasons why you might incorporate counterarguments in your writing. Counterarguments and rebuttals reinforce the overall argument. It may seem contradictory, but outlining and responding to opposing viewpoints strengthens your case.

By embracing and rebutting opposing claims, you call the counterargument into question. If you can effectively answer and rebut your opponents, your argument will appear more believable to your audience than the counterargument.

Second, it will help persuade your audience that your point of view is correct, especially if they are doubtful. Arguments can be either one-sided (no counterarguments or opposing views) or multi-sided (incorporating multiple perspectives).

One-sided arguments function best when the listener already believes your statements and reasoning. Because your audience already believes your notion, you don’t need to spend time debating other views.

A multisided argument involves presenting counterarguments, including rebuttals, and arguing why your stance is stronger. This strategy works best with an audience with various viewpoints since it demonstrates that you understand their thoughts while fighting for your own.

Counterarguments help to persuade your audience that your position is correct. You acknowledge their beliefs while demonstrating why your stance is superior.

How To Address Counter Arguments

Remember that arguments can be one-sided or multisided. If you are writing a multisided argument, you must understand how to address counterarguments based on your audience’s perspectives.

There are numerous approaches to answering counterarguments and developing rebuttals. These methods fall into two primary categories: rebuttal and concession.

SEE ALSO: How to Write a Children’s Picture Book in 12 Simple Steps

Refutation involves demonstrating that a counterargument contains logical fallacies or lacks supporting evidence. Logical fallacies are flaws in reasoning. You can use these logical fallacies to debunk and undermine an argument.

Refutation is an effective method for persuading an audience that may be more sympathetic to your point of view.

There are various techniques to disprove a counterargument.

Identify logical fallacies

When considering a counterargument, take the time to analyze its assertions and arguments. You may see logical flaws in the counterargument, such as incorrect reasoning or overgeneralization. You can address these fallacies in your rebuttal and explain why your argument is stronger.

Point out unstated assumptions made in the argument

In general, arguments frequently include unstated assumptions. For example, assume you’re researching the counterargument that professors should offer homework to help pupils learn academic topics. The idea is that pupils will have enough time at home to complete their tasks. To refute this premise in your argument, include statistics on how pupils do not have enough time to finish assignments.

Find counterexamples or counter-evidence

Your counterargument will incorporate data and evidence to support your claims. You’ll need to find proof and data to back up your reply. You should use this evidence and data if it calls into question the counterargument’s evidence.

Question the data used to support the counterargument

Authors will use data and statistics to support their logical claims in an essay. You should investigate the author’s use of this data to see if they properly cited it. If they misinterpreted it or it is out of current, you can address this in your response and provide a more accurate perspective.

Show how the counterargument’s experts or examples are flawed or not valid

Take the time to find out what sources the author is using. If you discover that a cited expert is not credible on the issue, or that an example is incorrect, you might undermine the counterargument by discussing the lack of credibility of an authority or example. In your argument, provide more compelling and accurate evidence.

READ ALSO: How to Write Up a Bill of Sale: What It Is, Examples, & 6 Steps to Follow

Concession is a rebuttal approach that admits an opposing argument is correct. However, you will demonstrate that your statements are stronger because they are supported by more compelling evidence.

For example, you may write an essay explaining why teachers should not assign homework. You would agree that the research for the homework is correct. However, you would give many pieces of data and explain why this research indicates that teachers should not favor homework.

There are two reasons to include compromises in your writing. For starters, a compromise is an excellent technique if your audience is sympathetic to the opposing viewpoint. Because you recognize the strength of the opposing argument, you will not alienate your audience.

Second, a concession can help your argument. Because you show that the counterargument is strong, you can strengthen your overall argument by providing more compelling evidence for why your stance is correct.

To start writing a counterargument, research the opposing viewpoints. You’ll need to conduct this study to grasp the grounds and claims supporting the opposing position.

This writing focuses on the most important statements and justifications for the opposing position. Begin your counterargument paragraph by summarizing and discussing the claims. Your argument will be more powerful if you can interact and respond to the most compelling information in the counterargument.

After outlining the competing points of view, write the response in the second part of the paragraph. To address the counterargument, use one of the tactics listed above. The counterargument you choose will be determined by your target audience and goals.

Remember, a skeptical audience may find concession more persuasive, while a neutral or supportive audience may support refutation. In the rebuttal, address the specific reasons and claims from the counterargument. You will want to use research to support your rebuttal.

Whether you put the counterargument or your primary argument first depends on your objectives. A counterargument refuted via refutation is typically found near the end of the essay after you have discussed your key claims. After presenting your claims and facts, use them to develop a reply to the counterargument.

Concessions are best used toward the beginning of the document, following the introduction. Because your major points demonstrate how your argument is stronger, you should introduce the opposing position from the start.

READ ALSO: How to Write a Children’s Picture Book in 12 Simple Steps

A counterargument paragraph typically includes the following elements:

Presentation of the opposing argument: Present the opposing argument objectively, giving it equal respect as your own.
Refutation: To successfully refute a counterargument, provide instances, facts, reasoning, and illustrations.
Transition to your argument: Use transitional sentences to take readers from the counterargument to your argument, ensuring coherence and flow.
Evidence and reasoning in support of your argument: After you’ve addressed the counterargument, back up your views with more justification and proof.

It is critical to remember that a counterargument paragraph is not intended to attack the opposing argument, but rather to accept and reply to it. This strengthens your own arguments by demonstrating a broader understanding of the issue and a willingness to consider competing ideas.

Keep these things in mind when you write argumentative essays, and avoid them as much as possible:

You haven’t done research on the multiple perspectives on the topic.
You don’t include supporting ideas for the positions against your thesis.
You dedicate too much space and attention to contradicting reasons.
You don’t bring up a different perspective in the introduction but keep to your opinion only.
Your line of thought is incoherent, and you constantly switch standpoints throughout the paper.
You use offensive or biased language to refute the opponent’s viewpoint.
You believe the opponent’s stance is wrong and don’t give it credit.
Besides having a strong argument, you make the counterview weak and ineffective.
You can’t explain how your position responds to the contradicting idea.
If you aren’t a rhetoric expert, avoid using sarcasm and satire.

SEE ALSO: How To Write Void Check: Uses, Step-by-Step Guide

Main Argument : “Implementing a four-day workweek would improve employee productivity and work-life balance.”

Counterargument Paragraph :

Some may argue that switching to a four-day workweek could negatively impact businesses, particularly in industries that rely on constant customer service or production. Opponents claim that reducing the number of workdays might lead to incomplete tasks and lower customer satisfaction due to delayed responses. However, studies from countries that have adopted shorter workweeks, such as Iceland, show that employees often become more efficient, completing the same amount of work in fewer hours. Additionally, companies can implement staggered shifts or rotating teams to ensure that business operations continue smoothly. By addressing these concerns, the benefits of a four-day workweek—such as increased productivity and employee well-being—far outweigh the potential drawbacks.

A counterargument is a viewpoint that opposes the main argument or position presented in a discussion, essay, or debate. It allows writers to acknowledge opposing perspectives and then refute them with evidence or reasoning.

Including a counterargument boosts your main point by demonstrating that you examined alternative perspectives. It also allows you to rebut such points of view, demonstrating the superiority of your argument and strengthening your viewpoint.

A counterargument begins with an introduction to the opposite viewpoint, followed by evidence supporting it. You next reject the counterargument with logical reasoning or evidence, so reinforcing your original assertion.

A counterargument can appear in different parts of your writing, depending on the structure. Commonly, it’s included after presenting the main argument but before the conclusion. However, in some cases, it may fit naturally within individual paragraphs addressing specific points.

This post helps you understand what is a counterargument and how to write a counterargument. Provided you follow the tips outlined above, it won’t take long to polish your work. If you have any concerns about your writing assignment, always ask your teacher for support.

edusson.com – How To Write A Counter Argument In An Essay
studysmarter.co.uk – Counter Argument
How To Write A Letter To A Friend in 17 Steps: Sample, Format, Example
How To Write Void Check: Uses, Step-by-Step Guide
How to Write a Children’s Picture Book in 12 Simple Steps

How to Write a Concluding Sentence and 12 Great Examples

How to write a romance novel in 7 easy steps, related posts, how to write punctuality prefect application letter with no experience in nigeria.

September 21, 2024
August 30, 2024
August 27, 2024