COMMENTS

  1. PDF Supreme Court Case Studies

    The Supreme Court Case Studiesbooklet contains 82 reproducible Supreme Court case studies. These cases include landmark decisions in American government that have helped and continue to shape this nation, as well as decisions dealing with current issues in American society. Every ... 41 Case Study 22:Olmstead v.

  2. PDF Supreme Court Case Study 41

    Supreme Court Case Study 41 (continued) ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★. The Supreme Court's Decision. ★★★★★★★★★The Court voted 6 to 3 to reverse the Ohio. Supreme Court's decision. Justice Tom C. C. ark wrote for the majority:"In extending the substantive protection of due process to all constitutionally ...

  3. supreme court case study Flashcards

    4.7 (20 reviews) Marbury v. Madison (1803) 1. The Marbury v. Madison case established the right of the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of laws. 2. It provided a way to check the powers of Congress and the president, and thus more effectively balanced the powers of all three branches of the federal government. 3.

  4. Search & Seizure Supreme Court Cases

    Below is a selection of Supreme Court cases involving searches and seizures, arranged from newest to oldest. Torres v. Madrid (2021) Author: John Roberts. The application of physical force to the body of a person with intent to restrain is a seizure even if the person does not submit and is not subdued. Kansas v.

  5. McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987)

    Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987) McCleskey v. Kemp. No. 84-6811. Argued October 15, 1986. Decided April 22, 1987. 481 U.S. 279. Syllabus. In 1978, petitioner, a black man, was convicted in a Georgia trial court of armed robbery and murder, arising from the killing of a white police officer during the robbery of a store.

  6. Supreme Court Cases By Topic

    Supreme Court Cases By Topic

  7. Supreme Court Cases Library

    The National Constitution Center's Supreme Court Cases Library includes materials on the most influential Supreme Court cases in American history. To ensure nonpartisan rigor and ideological diversity, we enlisted a pair of leading scholars from diverse constitutional perspectives—Caroline Fredrickson and Ilan Wurman—to help choose the landmark cases included in the Supreme Court Cases ...

  8. The Dobbs v. Jackson Decision, Annotated

    671. The Supreme Court on Friday overruled Roe v. Wade, eliminating the constitutional right to an abortion after almost 50 years in a 6-to-3 ruling. New York Times reporters are reading the ...

  9. Plessy v. Ferguson

    Citation163 U.S.537, 16 S. Ct. 1138, 41 L. Ed. 256, 1896 U.S. 3390. Brief Fact Summary. A Louisiana statute required railroad companies to provide separate, but equal accommodations for its Black and White passengers. The Plaintiff, Plessy (Plaintiff), was prosecuted under the statute after he refused to leave the section of a train reserved for.

  10. PDF Supreme Court of The United States

    FLOWERS v. MISSISSIPPI. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 17-9572. Argued March 20, 2019—Decided June 21, 2019. Petitioner Curtis Flowers has been tried six separate times for the murder of four employees of a Mississippi furniture store. Flowers is black; three of the four victims were white.

  11. PDF Supreme Court of The United States

    No. 20-255. Argued April 28, 2021—Decided June 23, 2021. Mahanoy Area High School student B. L. failed to make the school's var-sity cheerleading squad. While visiting a local convenience store over the weekend, B. L. posted two images on Snapchat, a social media ap-plication for smartphones that allows users to share temporary images ...

  12. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.

    Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984), also known as the " Betamax case ", is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that the making of individual copies of complete television shows for purposes of time shifting does not constitute copyright infringement, but can instead be defended as fair use. [1][2] The ...

  13. Gregg v. Georgia

    Gregg v. Georgia, Proffitt v.Florida, Jurek v.Texas, Woodson v.North Carolina, and Roberts v.Louisiana, 428 U.S. 153 (1976), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court.It reaffirmed the Court's acceptance of the use of the death penalty in the United States, upholding, in particular, the death sentence imposed on Troy Leon Gregg.The set of cases is referred to by a leading scholar as the ...

  14. Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard

    This case is no longer consolidated with No. 21-707, Students for Fair Admissions v. University of NC, et al., and one hour is allotted for oral argument. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration of this order. Jul 25 2022. Brief of respondent President and Fellows of Harvard College filed.

  15. United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987)

    Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987) United States v. Salerno No. 86-87 Argued January 21, 1987 Decided May 26, 1987 481 U.S. 739 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Syllabus The Bail Reform Act of 1984 (Act) requires courts to detain prior to trial arrestees charged with certain serious felonies if the Government ...

  16. PDF Supreme Court of The United States

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 21-454. Argued October 3, 2022—Decided May 25, 2023. Petitioners Michael and Chantell Sackett purchased property near Priest Lake, Idaho, and began backfilling the lot with dirt to prepare for building a home.

  17. Supreme Court Hands Federal Worker Major Win In Age Discrimination Case

    The Supreme Court ruled in cases involving age discrimination and traffic stops. The U.S. Supreme Court sided with older federal workers on Monday, making it easier for those over 40 to sue for ...

  18. Supreme Court

    10 L.Ed. 865. JOHN SWIFT. v. GEORGE W. TYSON. January Term, 1842. CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION from the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York. This action was instituted in the circuit court, upon a bill of exchange, dated at Portland, in the state of Maine, on the first day of May 1836, for $1536.30, payable six months after date ...

  19. Shelby County v. Holder

    Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and subsection (b) of Section 4 ...

  20. Required Supreme Court Cases

    Cram for AP US Government Unit 00 - Topic Overview with study guides and practice quizzes to review Marbury v. Madison, Federalism, Civil Liberties, and more. ... The Supreme Court, in this case, bolstered the freedom of the press guaranteed by the First Amendment. In a 6-3 vote, the Court established that there was a "heavy presumption ...

  21. Separation of Powers Supreme Court Cases

    The separation of powers is the concept that the executive, legislative, and judicial branches must operate in distinct, clearly defined spheres. The structure of the Constitution reflects the separation of powers. Article I provides power to the legislative branch (Congress), Article II to the executive branch (the President), and Article III ...

  22. {{meta.fullTitle}}

    American Association of Political Consultants Inc. A case in which the Court held that a provision of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 creating an exception to the prohibition on automated calls for government debt collection calls violates the First Amendment but is severable from the remainder of the statute.

  23. Summaries of Fair Use Cases

    In a case alleging 75 instances of infringement in an educational setting, a district court, proposing a fair use standard based on less than 10% of a book, determined that 70 instances were not infringing. On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit rejected the 10% standard and emphasized the importance of a flexible case-by-case fair use analysis.