what is a background in a research paper

• Manuscript Preparation

What is the Background of a Study and How Should it be Written?

• 3 minute read
• 902.8K views

Table of Contents

The background of a study is one of the most important components of a research paper. The quality of the background determines whether the reader will be interested in the rest of the study. Thus, to ensure that the audience is invested in reading the entire research paper, it is important to write an appealing and effective background. So, what constitutes the background of a study, and how must it be written?

What is the background of a study?

The background of a study is the first section of the paper and establishes the context underlying the research. It contains the rationale, the key problem statement, and a brief overview of research questions that are addressed in the rest of the paper. The background forms the crux of the study because it introduces an unaware audience to the research and its importance in a clear and logical manner. At times, the background may even explore whether the study builds on or refutes findings from previous studies. Any relevant information that the readers need to know before delving into the paper should be made available to them in the background.

How is a background different from the introduction?

The introduction of your research paper is presented before the background. Let’s find out what factors differentiate the background from the introduction.

• The introduction only contains preliminary data about the research topic and does not state the purpose of the study. On the contrary, the background clarifies the importance of the study in detail.
• The introduction provides an overview of the research topic from a broader perspective, while the background provides a detailed understanding of the topic.
• The introduction should end with the mention of the research questions, aims, and objectives of the study. In contrast, the background follows no such format and only provides essential context to the study.

How should one write the background of a research paper?

The length and detail presented in the background varies for different research papers, depending on the complexity and novelty of the research topic. At times, a simple background suffices, even if the study is complex. Before writing and adding details in the background, take a note of these additional points:

• Start with a strong beginning: Begin the background by defining the research topic and then identify the target audience.
• Cover key components: Explain all theories, concepts, terms, and ideas that may feel unfamiliar to the target audience thoroughly.
• Take note of important prerequisites: Go through the relevant literature in detail. Take notes while reading and cite the sources.
• Maintain a balance: Make sure that the background is focused on important details, but also appeals to a broader audience.
• Include historical data: Current issues largely originate from historical events or findings. If the research borrows information from a historical context, add relevant data in the background.
• Explain novelty: If the research study or methodology is unique or novel, provide an explanation that helps to understand the research better.
• Increase engagement: To make the background engaging, build a story around the central theme of the research

Avoid these mistakes while writing the background:

• Ambiguity: Don’t be ambiguous. While writing, assume that the reader does not understand any intricate detail about your research.
• Unrelated themes: Steer clear from topics that are not related to the key aspects of your research topic.
• Poor organization: Do not place information without a structure. Make sure that the background reads in a chronological manner and organize the sub-sections so that it flows well.

Writing the background for a research paper should not be a daunting task. But directions to go about it can always help. At Elsevier Author Services we provide essential insights on how to write a high quality, appealing, and logically structured paper for publication, beginning with a robust background. For further queries, contact our experts now!

How to Use Tables and Figures effectively in Research Papers

• Research Process

The Top 5 Qualities of Every Good Researcher

You may also like.

Make Hook, Line, and Sinker: The Art of Crafting Engaging Introductions

Can Describing Study Limitations Improve the Quality of Your Paper?

A Guide to Crafting Shorter, Impactful Sentences in Academic Writing

6 Steps to Write an Excellent Discussion in Your Manuscript

How to Write Clear and Crisp Civil Engineering Papers? Here are 5 Key Tips to Consider

The Clear Path to An Impactful Paper: ②

The Essentials of Writing to Communicate Research in Medicine

Changing Lines: Sentence Patterns in Academic Writing

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

What Is Background in a Research Paper?

So you have carefully written your research paper  and probably ran it through your colleagues ten to fifteen times. While there are many elements to a good research article, one of the most important elements for your readers is the background of your study.

What is Background of the Study in Research

The background of your study will provide context to the information discussed throughout the research paper . Background information may include both important and relevant studies. This is particularly important if a study either supports or refutes your thesis.

Why is Background of the Study Necessary in Research?

The background of the study discusses your problem statement, rationale, and research questions. It links  introduction to your research topic  and ensures a logical flow of ideas.  Thus, it helps readers understand your reasons for conducting the study.

Providing Background Information

The reader should be able to understand your topic and its importance. The length and detail of your background also depend on the degree to which you need to demonstrate your understanding of the topic. Paying close attention to the following questions will help you in writing background information:

• Are there any theories, concepts, terms, and ideas that may be unfamiliar to the target audience and will require you to provide any additional explanation?
• Any historical data that need to be shared in order to provide context on why the current issue emerged?
• Are there any concepts that may have been borrowed from other disciplines that may be unfamiliar to the reader and need an explanation?

Related: Ready with the background and searching for more information on journal ranking? Check this infographic on the SCImago Journal Rank today!

Is the research study unique for which additional explanation is needed? For instance, you may have used a completely new method

How to Write a Background of the Study

The structure of a background study in a research paper generally follows a logical sequence to provide context, justification, and an understanding of the research problem. It includes an introduction, general background, literature review , rationale , objectives, scope and limitations , significance of the study and the research hypothesis . Following the structure can provide a comprehensive and well-organized background for your research.

Here are the steps to effectively write a background of the study.

1. Identify Your Audience:

Determine the level of expertise of your target audience. Tailor the depth and complexity of your background information accordingly.

2. Understand the Research Problem:

Define the research problem or question your study aims to address. Identify the significance of the problem within the broader context of the field.

3. Review Existing Literature:

Conduct a thorough literature review to understand what is already known in the area. Summarize key findings, theories, and concepts relevant to your research.

4. Include Historical Data:

Integrate historical data if relevant to the research, as current issues often trace back to historical events.

5. Identify Controversies and Gaps:

Note any controversies or debates within the existing literature. Identify gaps , limitations, or unanswered questions that your research can address.

6. Select Key Components:

Choose the most critical elements to include in the background based on their relevance to your research problem. Prioritize information that helps build a strong foundation for your study.

7. Craft a Logical Flow:

Organize the background information in a logical sequence. Start with general context, move to specific theories and concepts, and then focus on the specific problem.

8. Highlight the Novelty of Your Research:

Clearly explain the unique aspects or contributions of your study. Emphasize why your research is different from or builds upon existing work.

Here are some extra tips to increase the quality of your research background:

Example of a Research Background

Here is an example of a research background to help you understand better.

The above hypothetical example provides a research background, addresses the gap and highlights the potential outcome of the study; thereby aiding a better understanding of the proposed research.

What Makes the Introduction Different from the Background?

Your introduction is different from your background in a number of ways.

• The introduction contains preliminary data about your topic that  the reader will most likely read , whereas the background clarifies the importance of the paper.
• The background of your study discusses in depth about the topic, whereas the introduction only gives an overview.
• The introduction should end with your research questions, aims, and objectives, whereas your background should not (except in some cases where your background is integrated into your introduction). For instance, the C.A.R.S. ( Creating a Research Space ) model, created by John Swales is based on his analysis of journal articles. This model attempts to explain and describe the organizational pattern of writing the introduction in social sciences.

Points to Note

Your background should begin with defining a topic and audience. It is important that you identify which topic you need to review and what your audience already knows about the topic. You should proceed by searching and researching the relevant literature. In this case, it is advisable to keep track of the search terms you used and the articles that you downloaded. It is helpful to use one of the research paper management systems such as Papers, Mendeley, Evernote, or Sente. Next, it is helpful to take notes while reading. Be careful when copying quotes verbatim and make sure to put them in quotation marks and cite the sources. In addition, you should keep your background focused but balanced enough so that it is relevant to a broader audience. Aside from these, your background should be critical, consistent, and logically structured.

Writing the background of your study should not be an overly daunting task. Many guides that can help you organize your thoughts as you write the background. The background of the study is the key to introduce your audience to your research topic and should be done with strong knowledge and thoughtful writing.

The background of a research paper typically ranges from one to two paragraphs, summarizing the relevant literature and context of the study. It should be concise, providing enough information to contextualize the research problem and justify the need for the study. Journal instructions about any word count limits should be kept in mind while deciding on the length of the final content.

The background of a research paper provides the context and relevant literature to understand the research problem, while the introduction also introduces the specific research topic, states the research objectives, and outlines the scope of the study. The background focuses on the broader context, whereas the introduction focuses on the specific research project and its objectives.

When writing the background for a study, start by providing a brief overview of the research topic and its significance in the field. Then, highlight the gaps in existing knowledge or unresolved issues that the study aims to address. Finally, summarize the key findings from relevant literature to establish the context and rationale for conducting the research, emphasizing the need and importance of the study within the broader academic landscape.

The background in a research paper is crucial as it sets the stage for the study by providing essential context and rationale. It helps readers understand the significance of the research problem and its relevance in the broader field. By presenting relevant literature and highlighting gaps, the background justifies the need for the study, building a strong foundation for the research and enhancing its credibility.

The presentation very informative

It is really educative. I love the workshop. It really motivated me into writing my first paper for publication.

an interesting clue here, thanks.

thanks for the answers.

Good and interesting explanation. Thanks

Thank you for good presentation.

Hi Adam, we are glad to know that you found our article beneficial

The background of the study is the key to introduce your audience to YOUR research topic.

Awesome. Exactly what i was looking forwards to 😉

Hi Maryam, we are glad to know that you found our resource useful.

my understanding of ‘Background of study’ has been elevated.

Hi Peter, we are glad to know that our article has helped you get a better understanding of the background in a research paper.

thanks to give advanced information

Hi Shimelis, we are glad to know that you found the information in our article beneficial.

When i was studying it is very much hard for me to conduct a research study and know the background because my teacher in practical research is having a research so i make it now so that i will done my research

Very informative……….Thank you.

The confusion i had before, regarding an introduction and background to a research work is now a thing of the past. Thank you so much.

Thanks for your help…

Thanks for your kind information about the background of a research paper.

Thanks for the answer

Very informative. I liked even more when the difference between background and introduction was given. I am looking forward to learning more from this site. I am in Botswana

Hello, I am Benoît from Central African Republic. Right now I am writing down my research paper in order to get my master degree in British Literature. Thank you very much for posting all this information about the background of the study. I really appreciate. Thanks!

The write up is quite good, detailed and informative. Thanks a lot. The article has certainly enhanced my understanding of the topic.

Rate this article Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Enago Academy's Most Popular Articles

• AI in Academia
• Infographic
• Manuscripts & Grants
• Reporting Research
• Trending Now

Can AI Tools Prepare a Research Manuscript From Scratch? — A comprehensive guide

As technology continues to advance, the question of whether artificial intelligence (AI) tools can prepare…

Abstract Vs. Introduction — Do you know the difference?

Ross wants to publish his research. Feeling positive about his research outcomes, he begins to…

• Old Webinars
• Webinar Mobile App

Demystifying Research Methodology With Field Experts

Choosing research methodology Research design and methodology Evidence-based research approach How RAxter can assist researchers

• Manuscript Preparation
• Publishing Research

How to Choose Best Research Methodology for Your Study

Successful research conduction requires proper planning and execution. While there are multiple reasons and aspects…

Top 5 Key Differences Between Methods and Methodology

While burning the midnight oil during literature review, most researchers do not realize that the…

How to Draft the Acknowledgment Section of a Manuscript

Discussion Vs. Conclusion: Know the Difference Before Drafting Manuscripts

Sign-up to read more

Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:

• 2000+ blog articles
• 50+ Webinars
• 10+ Expert podcasts
• 50+ Infographics
• 10+ Checklists
• Research Guides

We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.

I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:

As a researcher, what do you consider most when choosing an image manipulation detector?

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• Background Information
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Applying Critical Thinking
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

Background information identifies and describes the history and nature of a well-defined research problem with reference to contextualizing existing literature. The background information should indicate the root of the problem being studied, appropriate context of the problem in relation to theory, research, and/or practice , its scope, and the extent to which previous studies have successfully investigated the problem, noting, in particular, where gaps exist that your study attempts to address. Background information does not replace the literature review section of a research paper; it is intended to place the research problem within a specific context and an established plan for its solution.

Fitterling, Lori. Researching and Writing an Effective Background Section of a Research Paper. Kansas City University of Medicine & Biosciences; Creating a Research Paper: How to Write the Background to a Study. DurousseauElectricalInstitute.com; Background Information: Definition of Background Information. Literary Devices Definition and Examples of Literary Terms.

Importance of Having Enough Background Information

Background information expands upon the key points stated in the beginning of your introduction but is not intended to be the main focus of the paper. It generally supports the question, what is the most important information the reader needs to understand before continuing to read the paper? Sufficient background information helps the reader determine if you have a basic understanding of the research problem being investigated and promotes confidence in the overall quality of your analysis and findings. This information provides the reader with the essential context needed to conceptualize the research problem and its significance before moving on to a more thorough analysis of prior research.

Forms of contextualization included in background information can include describing one or more of the following:

• Cultural -- placed within the learned behavior of a specific group or groups of people.
• Economic -- of or relating to systems of production and management of material wealth and/or business activities.
• Gender -- located within the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with being self-identified as male, female, or other form of  gender expression.
• Historical -- the time in which something takes place or was created and how the condition of time influences how you interpret it.
• Interdisciplinary -- explanation of theories, concepts, ideas, or methodologies borrowed from other disciplines applied to the research problem rooted in a discipline other than the discipline where your paper resides.
• Philosophical -- clarification of the essential nature of being or of phenomena as it relates to the research problem.
• Physical/Spatial -- reflects the meaning of space around something and how that influences how it is understood.
• Political -- concerns the environment in which something is produced indicating it's public purpose or agenda.
• Social -- the environment of people that surrounds something's creation or intended audience, reflecting how the people associated with something use and interpret it.
• Temporal -- reflects issues or events of, relating to, or limited by time. Concerns past, present, or future contextualization and not just a historical past.

Background information can also include summaries of important research studies . This can be a particularly important element of providing background information if an innovative or groundbreaking study about the research problem laid a foundation for further research or there was a key study that is essential to understanding your arguments. The priority is to summarize for the reader what is known about the research problem before you conduct the analysis of prior research. This is accomplished with a general summary of the foundational research literature [with citations] that document findings that inform your study's overall aims and objectives.

NOTE : Research studies cited as part of the background information of your introduction should not include very specific, lengthy explanations. This should be discussed in greater detail in your literature review section. If you find a study requiring lengthy explanation, consider moving it to the literature review section.

ANOTHER NOTE : In some cases, your paper's introduction only needs to introduce the research problem, explain its significance, and then describe a road map for how you are going to address the problem; the background information basically forms the introduction part of your literature review. That said, while providing background information is not required, including it in the introduction is a way to highlight important contextual information that could otherwise be hidden or overlooked by the reader if placed in the literature review section.

Background of the Problem Section: What do you Need to Consider? Anonymous. Harvard University; Hopkins, Will G. How to Write a Research Paper. SPORTSCIENCE, Perspectives/Research Resources. Department of Physiology and School of Physical Education, University of Otago, 1999; Green, L. H. How to Write the Background/Introduction Section. Physics 499 Powerpoint slides. University of Illinois; Pyrczak, Fred. Writing Empirical Research Reports: A Basic Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences . 8th edition. Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing, 2014; Stevens, Kathleen C. “Can We Improve Reading by Teaching Background Information?.” Journal of Reading 25 (January 1982): 326-329; Woodall, W. Gill. Writing the Background and Significance Section. Senior Research Scientist and Professor of Communication. Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions. University of New Mexico.

Structure and Writing Style

Providing background information in the introduction of a research paper serves as a bridge that links the reader to the research problem . Precisely how long and in-depth this bridge should be is largely dependent upon how much information you think the reader will need to know in order to fully understand the problem being discussed and to appreciate why the issues you are investigating are important.

From another perspective, the length and detail of background information also depends on the degree to which you need to demonstrate to your professor how much you understand the research problem. Keep this in mind because providing pertinent background information can be an effective way to demonstrate that you have a clear grasp of key issues, debates, and concepts related to your overall study.

The structure and writing style of your background information can vary depending upon the complexity of your research and/or the nature of the assignment. However, in most cases it should be limited to only one to two paragraphs in your introduction.

Given this, here are some questions to consider while writing this part of your introduction :

• Are there concepts, terms, theories, or ideas that may be unfamiliar to the reader and, thus, require additional explanation?
• Are there historical elements that need to be explored in order to provide needed context, to highlight specific people, issues, or events, or to lay a foundation for understanding the emergence of a current issue or event?
• Are there theories, concepts, or ideas borrowed from other disciplines or academic traditions that may be unfamiliar to the reader and therefore require further explanation?
• Is there a key study or small set of studies that set the stage for understanding the topic and frames why it is important to conduct further research on the topic?
• Y our study uses a method of analysis never applied before;
• Your study investigates a very esoteric or complex research problem;
• Your study introduces new or unique variables that need to be taken into account ; or,
• Your study relies upon analyzing unique texts or documents, such as, archival materials or primary documents like diaries or personal letters that do not represent the established body of source literature on the topic?

Almost all introductions to a research problem require some contextualizing, but the scope and breadth of background information varies depending on your assumption about the reader's level of prior knowledge . However, despite this assessment, background information should be brief and succinct and sets the stage for the elaboration of critical points or in-depth discussion of key issues in the literature review section of your paper.

Writing Tip

Background Information vs. the Literature Review

Incorporating background information into the introduction is intended to provide the reader with critical information about the topic being studied, such as, highlighting and expanding upon foundational studies conducted in the past, describing important historical events that inform why and in what ways the research problem exists, defining key components of your study [concepts, people, places, phenomena] and/or placing the research problem within a particular context. Although introductory background information can often blend into the literature review portion of the paper, essential background information should not be considered a substitute for a comprehensive review and synthesis of relevant research literature.

Hart, Cris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998; Pyrczak, Fred. Writing Empirical Research Reports: A Basic Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences . 8th edition. Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing, 2014.

• << Previous: The C.A.R.S. Model
• Next: The Research Problem/Question >>
• Last Updated: May 7, 2024 9:40 AM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

What is the Background in a Research Paper?

An effective Background section in your manuscript establishes the context for your study. And while original research requires novel findings, providing the necessary background information for these findings may be just as important. It lets your readers know that your findings are novel, important, and worthy of their time and attention.

Updated on October 3, 2022

A good Background section explains the history and nature of your research question in relation to existing literature – a “state of the art.” This section, along with the rationale, helps readers understand why you chose to study this problem and why your study is worthwhile. This article will show you how to do this.

Read on to better understand the:

• Real purpose of the Background section
• Typical length of a Background section and its placement
• Elements of an effective Background

What is the Background section of a research paper?

The Background section is an essential element of every study, answering:

• What do we already know about the topic?
• How does your study relate to what's been done so far in your field?
• What is its scope?
• Why does the topic warrant your interest and their interest?
• How did you develop the research question that you'll later introduce?

In grant writing, a Background section is often referred to as the “state of the art,” and this is a useful term to have in mind when writing this part of your paper.

What comes next?

After you make the above points,

• Formulate your research question/hypothesis . Research aims and objectives should be closely related to how you'll fill the gap you've identified in the literature. Your research gap is the central theme of your article and why people should read it.
• Summarize how you'll address it in the paper . Your methodology needs to be appropriate for addressing the “problem” you've identified.
• Describe the significance of your study . Show how your research fits into the bigger picture.

Note that the Background section isn't the same as the research rationale. Rather, it provides the relevant information the reader needs so they can follow your rationale. For example, it

• Explains scientific terms
• Provides available data and statistics on the topic
• Describes the methods used so far on your topic. Especially if these are different from what you're going to do. Take special care here, because this is often where peer reviewers focus intently.

This is a logical approach to what comes after the study's background. Use it and the reader can easily follow along from the broader information to the specific details that come later. Crucially, they'll have confidence that your analysis and findings are valid.

Where should the background be placed in a research paper?

Usually, the background comes after the statement of the problem, in the Introduction section. Logically, you need to provide the study context before discussing the research questions, methodology, and results.

The background can be found in:

The abstract

The background typically forms the first few sentences of the abstract. Why did you do the study? Most journals state this clearly. In an unstructured (no subheadings) abstract, it's the first sentence or two. In a structured abstract, it might be called the Introduction, Background, or State-of-the-Art.

PLOS Medicine , for example, asks for research article abstracts to be split into three sections: Background, Methods and Findings, and Conclusions. Journals in the humanities or social sciences might not clearly ask for it because articles sometimes have a looser structure than STEM articles.

The first part of the Introduction section

In the journal Nature , for example, the Introduction should be around 200 words and include

• Two to three sentences giving a basic introduction to the field.
• The background and rationale of the study are stated briefly.
• A simple phrase “Here we show ...”, or “In this study, we show ....” (to round out the Introduction).

The Journal of Organic Chemistry has similar author guidelines.

The Background as a distinct section

This is often the case for research proposals or some types of reports, as discussed above. Rather than reviewing the literature, this is a concise summary of what's currently known in the field relevant to the question being addressed in this proposed study.

How long should the Background section be?

As mentioned, there's no set length for the Background section. It generally depends on the journal and the content of your manuscript. Check the journal's author guidelines, the research center, granting agency, etc. If it's still not clear or if the instructions are contradictory, email or phone them directly.

The length of your background will depend on:

The manuscript length and content

A book-length study needs a more extensive Background than a four-page research article. Exploring a relatively unknown method or question might also need a longer Background.

For example, see this Frontiers article on the applications of artificial intelligence for developing COVID-19 vaccines. It has a seven-paragraph long Background (1,200 words) in a separate section. The authors need to discuss earlier successful uses of machine learning for therapy discovery to make a convincing case.

An academic paper published in an international journal is usually around 5,000 words. Your paper needs to be balanced, with appropriate text lengths used for the different sections: It would make no sense to have a 300-word introduction and then 4,000 words for the methods, for example. In a 5,000-word manuscript, you'll be able to use about 1,500 for the introduction, which includes the background.

How much you need to show your understanding of the topic

A lengthy grant application might need a longer Background (sub-)section. That's because if they're going to grant you money, they need a very good reason to. You'll need to show that the work is both interesting and doable. The Background is where you can do this.

What should the Background of a research manuscript include?

The Background of a research paper needs to show two things:

The study's territory ( scope )

First, provide a general overview of the field. Scientists in most disciplines should find it relatively easy to understand. Be broad, keep it interesting. Don't go into the specifics of your particular study.

Let's look at two examples:

• one from basic research (seeking to generate new knowledge)
• one from applied research (trying to solve or improve existing processes or products)

Applied research

This Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence article explores how AI can help discover treatments for COVID-19.

The background of the study can be found (i) in the abstract and (ii) in a separate section discussed at the end of this article. The abstract starts with this general overview: “SARS-COV-2 has roused the scientific community with a call to action to combat the growing pandemic.” ( Arshadi et al., 2020 ). This is broad, and it's interesting. This is a topic that many researchers (even from outside this specific area) may want to learn more about.

Think of any theories, models, concepts, or terms (maybe borrowed from different disciplines) that may be unfamiliar to your reader. Be sure to clarify them in plainer language, if necessary.

For example, this systematic review looks at the connections of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care. The Background is in the Introduction section. It starts by defining what burnout is:

• “Burnout is defined as a syndrome related to work that involves three key dimensions.” ( Hodkinson et al., 2022 )

The authors go on to explain its three aspects: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a sense of reduced personal accomplishment.

Basic research

Imagine you're investigating how universities' moves to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic impacted students' learning outcomes in the United Kingdom. The overview could be:

• The COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing lockdown generated tremendous challenges across the higher education sector. University campuses were forced to close. Face-to-face teaching and assessment transitioned into a virtual format.

2. The niche in the field (motivation)

To establish the niche in your field, describe what drove you to explore this specific topic.

• Explain how (un)successfully previous studies have investigated the problem.
• Note the knowledge gap or present a problem with a currently used process/practice/product.

After setting the stage, the abstract of the Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence article identifies a problem:

• “At the time of this writing, there are as yet no novel antiviral agents or approved vaccines available for deployment as a frontline defense.” ( Arshadi et al., 2020 )

The authors need to support their claim that computational methods can help discover new COVID-19 treatments. They do so by referring to previous research findings:

• “In the last decade, machine learning-based models, trained on specific biomolecules, have offered inexpensive and rapid implementation methods for the discovery of effective viral therapies.” ( Arshadi et al., 2020 )

Going back to the study on students' learning outcomes after universities introduced e-learning. The background section will next identify and describe the current knowledge gap and your proposed method of fixing it. It may be something like:

• Existing literature and studies by the UK Department for Education reveal x + y changes and effects on teaching and learning. Yet they provide little to no information on students' learning outcomes. Understanding the impact of online teaching and assessments on student outcomes is key to adopting future teaching practices and ensuring students from disadvantaged backgrounds are not left behind.

How is the background different from the literature review?

Both the background and literature review sections compile previous studies that are relevant and important to the topic.

Despite their similarities, they're different in scope and aims.

Overall, the research background could be seen as a small part of the detailed critical discussion in the literature review. Almost always, primary research articles do not include a detailed literature review.

How is the Background different from the Introduction section?

Although often part of the Introduction, the Background differs from the Introduction in scope and aim.

Breakdown of the Background in published articles

Consider this systematic review looking at the connections of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care.

The Background is placed in the Introduction section. It's critical, consistent, and logically structured, moving from general to specific information.

You can also check out the summary paragraph breakdown provided by Nature. (Nature's “summary paragraph” is essentially an abstract.)

And if you're looking for some help, or have an article that's finished but needs a pre-submission review click here to connect with one of our expert AJE editors.

Gareth Dyke, PhD

Director of Global Content

See our "Privacy Policy"

• Affiliate Program

• UNITED STATES
• 台灣 (TAIWAN)
• TÜRKIYE (TURKEY)
• Academic Editing Services
• - Research Paper
• - Journal Manuscript
• - Dissertation
• - College & University Assignments
• Admissions Editing Services
• - Application Essay
• - Personal Statement
• - Recommendation Letter
• - Cover Letter
• - CV/Resume
• Business Editing Services
• - Business Documents
• - Report & Brochure
• - Website & Blog
• Writer Editing Services
• - Script & Screenplay
• Our Editors
• Client Reviews
• Editing & Proofreading Prices
• Wordvice Points
• Partner Discount
• Plagiarism Checker
• APA Citation Generator
• MLA Citation Generator
• Chicago Citation Generator
• Vancouver Citation Generator
• - APA Style
• - MLA Style
• - Chicago Style
• - Vancouver Style
• Writing & Editing Guide
• Academic Resources
• Admissions Resources

What is the Background of the Study and How to Write It

What is the Background of the Study in Research? 

The background of the study is the first section of a research paper and gives context surrounding the research topic. The background explains to the reader where your research journey started, why you got interested in the topic, and how you developed the research question that you will later specify. That means that you first establish the context of the research you did with a general overview of the field or topic and then present the key issues that drove your decision to study the specific problem you chose.

Once the reader understands where you are coming from and why there was indeed a need for the research you are going to present in the following—because there was a gap in the current research, or because there is an obvious problem with a currently used process or technology—you can proceed with the formulation of your research question and summarize how you are going to address it in the rest of your manuscript.

Why is the Background of the Study Important?

No matter how surprising and important the findings of your study are, if you do not provide the reader with the necessary background information and context, they will not be able to understand your reasons for studying the specific problem you chose and why you think your study is relevant. And more importantly, an editor who does not share your enthusiasm for your work (because you did not fill them in on all the important details) will very probably not even consider your manuscript worthy of their and the reviewers’ time and will immediately send it back to you.

To avoid such desk rejections , you need to make sure you pique the reader’s interest and help them understand the contribution of your work to the specific field you study, the more general research community, or the public. Introducing the study background is crucial to setting the scene for your readers.

Table of Contents:

• What is “Background Information” in a Research Paper?
• What Should the Background of a Research Paper Include?
• Where Does the Background Section Go in Your Paper?

Background of the Study Structure

Before writing your study background, it is essential to understand what to include. The following elements should all be included in the background and are presented in greater detail in the next section:

• A general overview of the topic and why it is important (overlaps with establishing the “importance of the topic” in the Introduction)
• The current state of the research on the topic or on related topics in the field
• Controversies about current knowledge or specific past studies that undergird your research methodology
• Any claims or assumptions that have been made by researchers, institutions, or politicians that might need to be clarified
• Methods and techniques used in the study or from which your study deviated in some way

Presenting the Study Background

As you begin introducing your background, you first need to provide a general overview and include the main issues concerning the topic. Depending on whether you do “basic” (with the aim of providing further knowledge) or “applied” research (to establish new techniques, processes, or products), this is either a literature review that summarizes all relevant earlier studies in the field or a description of the process (e.g., vote counting) or practice (e.g., diagnosis of a specific disease) that you think is problematic or lacking and needs a solution.

Example s of a general overview

If you study the function of a Drosophila gene, for example, you can explain to the reader why and for whom the study of fly genetics is relevant, what is already known and established, and where you see gaps in the existing literature. If you investigated how the way universities have transitioned into online teaching since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic has affected students’ learning progress, then you need to present a summary of what changes have happened around the world, what the effects of those changes have been so far, and where you see problems that need to be addressed. Note that you need to provide sources for every statement and every claim you make here, to establish a solid foundation of knowledge for your own study. 

Describing the current state of knowledge

When the reader understands the main issue(s), you need to fill them in more specifically on the current state of the field (in basic research) or the process/practice/product use you describe (in practical/applied research). Cite all relevant studies that have already reported on the Drosophila gene you are interested in, have failed to reveal certain functions of it, or have suggested that it might be involved in more processes than we know so far. Or list the reports from the education ministries of the countries you are interested in and highlight the data that shows the need for research into the effects of the Corona-19 pandemic on teaching and learning.

Discussing controversies, claims, and assumptions

Are there controversies regarding your topic of interest that need to be mentioned and/or addressed? For example, if your research topic involves an issue that is politically hot, you can acknowledge this here. Have any earlier claims or assumptions been made, by other researchers, institutions, or politicians, that you think need to be clarified?

Mentioning methodologies and approaches

While putting together these details, you also need to mention methodologies : What methods/techniques have been used so far to study what you studied and why are you going to either use the same or a different approach? Are any of the methods included in the literature review flawed in such a way that your study takes specific measures to correct or update? While you shouldn’t spend too much time here justifying your methods (this can be summarized briefly in the rationale of the study at the end of the Introduction and later in the Discussion section), you can engage with the crucial methods applied in previous studies here first.

When you have established the background of the study of your research paper in such a logical way, then the reader should have had no problem following you from the more general information you introduced first to the specific details you added later. You can now easily lead over to the relevance of your research, explain how your work fits into the bigger picture, and specify the aims and objectives of your study. This latter part is usually considered the “ statement of the problem ” of your study. Without a solid research paper background, this statement will come out of nowhere for the reader and very probably raise more questions than you were planning to answer.   

Where does the study background section go in a paper?

Unless you write a research proposal or some kind of report that has a specific “Background” chapter, the background of your study is the first part of your introduction section . This is where you put your work in context and provide all the relevant information the reader needs to follow your rationale. Make sure your background has a logical structure and naturally leads into the statement of the problem at the very end of the introduction so that you bring everything together for the reader to judge the relevance of your work and the validity of your approach before they dig deeper into the details of your study in the methods section .

Consider Receiving Professional Editing Services

Now that you know how to write a background section for a research paper, you might be interested in our AI text editor at Wordvice AI. And be sure to receive professional editing services , including academic editing and proofreading , before submitting your manuscript to journals. On the Wordvice academic resources website, you can also find many more articles and other resources that can help you with writing the other parts of your research paper , with making a research paper outline before you put everything together, or with writing an effective cover letter once you are ready to submit.

Writing Research Background

Research background is a brief outline of the most important studies that have been conducted so far presented in a chronological order. Research background part in introduction chapter can be also headed ‘Background of the Study.” Research background should also include a brief discussion of major theories and models related to the research problem.

Specifically, when writing research background you can discuss major theories and models related to your research problem in a chronological order to outline historical developments in the research area.  When writing research background, you also need to demonstrate how your research relates to what has been done so far in the research area.

Research background is written after the literature review. Therefore, literature review has to be the first and the longest stage in the research process, even before the formulation of research aims and objectives, right after the selection of the research area. Once the research area is selected, the literature review is commenced in order to identify gaps in the research area.

Research aims and objectives need to be closely associated with the elimination of this gap in the literature. The main difference between background of the study and literature review is that the former only provides general information about what has been done so far in the research area, whereas the latter elaborates and critically reviews previous works.

John Dudovskiy

Organizing Academic Research Papers: Background Information

• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Executive Summary
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tertiary Sources
• What Is Scholarly vs. Popular?
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Annotated Bibliography
• Dealing with Nervousness
• Using Visual Aids
• Grading Someone Else's Paper
• How to Manage Group Projects
• Multiple Book Review Essay
• Reviewing Collected Essays
• About Informed Consent
• Writing Field Notes
• Writing a Policy Memo
• Writing a Research Proposal
• Acknowledgements

Background information identifies and describes the history and nature of a well-defined research problem with reference to the existing literature. Background information in your Introduction should indicate the root of the problem being studied, its scope, and the extent to which previous studies have successfully investigated the problem, noting, in particular, where gaps exist that your study attempts to address.  Introductory background information differs from a literature review in that it places the research problem in proper context rather than thoroughly examining pertinent literature.

Importance of Having Enough Background Information

Background information expands upon the key points stated in your introduction but is not the main focus of the paper. Sufficient background information helps your reader determine if you have a basic understanding of the research problem being investigated and promotes confidence in the overall quality of your analysis and findings.

Background information provides the reader with the essential context needed to understand the research problem . Depending on the topic being studied, forms of contextualization may include:

• Cultural -- the issue placed within the learned behavior of specific groups of people.
• Economic -- of or relating to systems of production and management of material wealth and/or business activities.
• Historical -- the time in which something takes place or was created and how that influences how you interpret it.
• Philosophical -- clarification of the essential nature of being or of phenomena as it relates to the research problem.
• Physical/Spatial -- reflects the space around something and how that influences how you see it.
• Political -- concerns the environment in which something is produced indicating it's public purpose or agenda.
• Social -- the environment of people that surrounds something's creation or intended audience, reflecting how the people around something use and interpret it.
• Temporal -- reflects issues or events of, relating to, or limited by time.

Background information can also include summaries of important, relevant research studies . The key is to summarize for the reader what is known about the specific research problem before you conducted your analysis. This is accomplished with a general review of the foundational research literature (with citations) that report findings that inform your study's aims and objectives.

NOTE : Research studies cited as part of the background information of your introduction should not include very specific, lengthy explanations. This should be discussed in greater detail in your literature review section.

Background of the Problem Section: What do you Need to Consider? Anonymous. Harvard University; Hopkins, Will G. How to Write a Research Paper . SPORTSCIENCE, Perspectives/Research Resources. Department of Physiology and School of Physical Education, University of Otago, 1999; Green, L. H. How to Write the Background/Introduction Section. Physics 499 Powerpoint slides. University of Illinois; Woodall, W. Gill. Writing the Background and Significance Section. Senior Research Scientist and Professor of Communication. Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions. University of New Mexico.  

Structure and Writing Style

Providing background information in the Introduction of a research paper serves as a bridge that links the reader to the topic of your study . But precisely how long and in-depth this bridge should be is largely dependent upon how much information you think the reader will need in order to understand the research problem being discussed and to appreciate why the issues you are investigating are important.

From another perspective, the length and detail of background information also depends on the degree to which you need to demonstrate to your professor how much you understand the topic. Keep this in mind because providing succinct background information can be an effective way to show that you have a clear grasp of key issues and concepts underpinning your overall study. Don't try to show off, though!

Given that the structure and writing style of your background information can vary depending upon the complexity of your research and/or the nature of the assignment, here are some questions to consider while writing :

• Are there concepts, terms, theories, or ideas that may be unfamiliar to the reader and, thus, require additional explanation?
• Are there historical elements that need to be explored in order to add needed context, to highlight specific people, issues, or events, or to lay a foundation for understanding the emergence of a current issue or event?
• Is the research study unusual in some way that requires additional explanation, such as, a) your study uses a method never applied before to the research problem you are investigating; b) your study investigates a very esoteric or complex research problem; or, c) your study relies upon analyzing unique texts or documents, such as archival materials or primary documents like diaries or personal letters, that do not represent the established body of source literature on the topic.

Background of the Problem Section: What do you Need to Consider? Anonymous. Harvard University; Hopkins, Will G. How to Write a Research Paper . SPORTSCIENCE, Perspectives/Research Resources. Department of Physiology and School of Physical Education, University of Otago, 1999; Green, L. H. How to Write the Background/Introduction Section. Physics 499 Powerpoint slides. University of Illinois; Woodall, W. Gill. Writing the Background and Significance Section. Senior Research Scientist and Professor of Communication. Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions. University of New Mexico.

Writing Tip

Background Information vs. the Literature Review

Incorporating background information into the Introduction is intended to provide the reader with critical information about the topic being studied, such as highlighting and expanding upon foundational studies conducted in the past, important historical events that inform why and in what ways the research problem exists, or defining key components of your study [concepts, people, places, things]. Although in social sciences research introductory background information can often blend into the literature review portion of the paper, basic background information should not be considered a substitute for a comprehensive review and synthesis of relevant research literature.

• << Previous: 4. The Introduction
• Next: The Research Problem/Question >>
• Last Updated: Jul 18, 2023 11:58 AM
• URL: https://library.sacredheart.edu/c.php?g=29803
• QuickSearch
• Library Catalog
• Databases A-Z
• Publication Finder
• Course Reserves
• Citation Linker
• Digital Commons
• Our Website

Research Support

• Ask a Librarian
• Appointments
• Interlibrary Loan (ILL)
• Research Guides
• Databases by Subject
• Citation Help

Using the Library

• Reserve a Group Study Room
• Renew Books
• Honors Study Rooms
• Off-Campus Access
• Library Policies
• Library Technology

User Information

• Grad Students
• Online Students
• COVID-19 Updates
• Staff Directory
• News & Announcements
• Library Newsletter

My Accounts

• Interlibrary Loan
• Staff Site Login

FIND US ON  

Get Your Research Started: Find Background Info

• Your Research Question
• Find Background Info
• Find Sources
• Find Primary Sources This link opens in a new window
• Read and Evaluate
• Write and Cite

Why Background Research Helps

Background research (or pre-research) is the research that you do before you start writing your paper or working on your project. Sometimes background research happens before you've even chosen a topic. The purpose of background research is to make the research that goes into your paper or project easier and more successful. 

Some reasons to do background research include:

• Determining an appropriate scope for your research:  Successful research starts with a topic or question that is appropriate to the scope of the assignment. A topic that is too broad means too much relevant information to review and distill. If your topic is too narrow, there won't be enough information to do meaningful research.
• Understanding how your research fits in with the broader conversation surrounding the topic:  What are the major points of view or areas of interest in discussions of your research topic and how does your research fit in with these? Answering this question can help you define the parts of your topic that you need to explore.
• Establishing the value of your research : What is the impact of your research and why does it matter? How might your research clarify or change our understanding of the topic?
• Identifying experts and other important perspectives:  Are there scholars whose work you need to understand for your research to be complete? Are there points of view that you need to include or address?

Doing background research helps you choose a topic that you'll be happy with and develop a sense of what research you'll need to do in order to successfully complete your assignment. It will also help you plan your research and understand how much time you'll need to dedicate to understanding and exploring your topic.

Remember: we generally do not cite information from encyclopedias, dictionaries, or reference books in our papers. 

Information adapted from Old Dominion University.

Credo Reference

Credo is a library database containing digital versions of encyclopedias and other reference works. Think of it as an academic Wikipedia, only curated by librarians instead of the general public.

Oxford Reference

• Oxford Reference Online This link opens in a new window Includes digitized, continuously updated entries from Oxfords dictionaries, companions, and encyclopedias, spanning 25 different subject areas including archaeology, classical studies, linguistics, philosophy, and more.
• << Previous: Your Research Question
• Next: Find Sources >>
• Last Updated: Jan 23, 2024 1:09 PM
• URL: https://libguides.library.cofc.edu/libraryresearch

College Quick Links

• UConn Library
• Research Now
• Get Started
• Background Research

Get Started — Background Research

• Reading (and Understanding) Your Assignment
• Initial Searching
• Forming a Research Question
• Help & Other Resources
• Research Now Homepage

What's Happening When You Do Background Research?

When you do background research, you're exploring your general area of interest so that you can form a more focused topic. You will be making an entry into an ongoing conversation, and you have the opportunity to ask new questions and create new knowledge.

Why is this important?

Have you ever done a project that just never seemed to come together?

"I had a general idea but not a specific focus. As I was writing, I didn't know what my focus was. When I was finished, I didn't know what my focus was. My teacher says she doesn't know what my focus was. I don't think I ever acquired a focus. It was an impossible paper to write. I would just sit there and say, "I'm stuck." If I learned anything from that paper it is, you have to have a focus. You have to have something to center on. You can't just have a topic. You should have an idea when you start. I had a topic but I didn't know what I wanted to do with it. I figured that when I did my research it would focus in. But I didn't let it. I kept saying, 'this is interesting and this is interesting and I'll just smush it all together.' It didn't work out." -(Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century)

Can you relate?

Doing background research to explore your initial topic can help you to find create a focused research question . Another benefit to background searching - it's very hard to write about something if you don't know anything about it! At this point, collecting ideas to help you construct your focused topic will be very helpful. Not every idea you encounter will find its way into your final project, so don't worry about collecting very, very detailed information just yet. Wait until your project has found a focus.

While you're doing you're background research, don't be surprised if your topic changes in unexpected ways -  you're discovering more about your topic, and you're making choices based on on the new information you find. If your topic changes, that's OK!

• Research Log

What Interests You?

Identifying what interests you in the context of your assignment can help you get started on your research project.

Some questions to consider:

Why is your project interesting/important to you? To your community? To the world?

What about your project sparks your curiosity and creativity?

Some ideas from the Reference Librarians at Gustavus Adolphus

• Make a list of possible issues to research. Use class discussions, texts, personal interests, conversations with friends, and discussions with your teacher for ideas. Start writing them down - you'd be surprised how much faster they come once you start writing.
• Map out the topic by finding out what others have had to say about it. This is not the time for in-depth reading, but rather for a quick scan. Many students start with a Google search, but you can also browse the shelves where books on the topic are kept and see what controversies or issues have been receiving attention. Search a database for articles on your topic area and sort out the various approaches writers have taken. Look for overviews and surveys of the topic that put the various schools of thought or approaches in context. You may start out knowing virtually nothing about your topic, but after scanning what's out there you should have several ideas worth following up.
• Invent questions. Do two things you come across seem to offer interesting contrasts? Does one thing seem intriguingly connected to something else? Is there something about the topic that surprises you? Do you encounter anything that makes you wonder why? Do you run into something that makes you think, "no way! That can't be right." Chances are you've just uncovered a good research focus.
• Draft a proposal for research. Sometimes a teacher will ask you for a formal written proposal. Even if it isn’t required, it can be a useful exercise. Write down what you want to do, how you plan to do it, and why it's important. You may well change your topic entirely by the time its finished, but writing down where you plan to take your research at this stage can help you clarify your thoughts and plan your next steps.

-Source: The Reference Librarians at Gustavus Adolphus College

• The Reference Librarians at Gustavus Adolphus College

What am I looking for?

It can be very helpful to write out your thoughts as you work through the answers to these questions.

Think about what you need to know:

• What do you already know about your topic?
• What don't you know about your topic? What do you feel like you might need to know? 
• What are the fundamental facts and background on your topic? What do you need to know to write knowledgeably about your topic?
• What are the different viewpoints on your topic? You should expect to encounter diverse views on a topic.

And of course...

• What is your assignment asking of you? 

When you are doing your research, you are not looking for one perfect source with one right answer. You're collecting and thinking critically about ideas to form a focus for your own research.

If you're having trouble answering these questions, you might find the six journalist's questions helpful in focusing your thinking:

Don't feel like you need to get bogged down in the minutiae of every source at this point!

At this point in your research, you are browsing for ideas and information to help you fill in the gaps. You're looking to develop a more focused topic. When you focus your topic you'll be able to really engage with the sources that will help you with your sources.

Not quite sure how to get started? The KWHL Tool will help you visualize your thinking, and start organizing the information you find. It will help you sort out

• What you already know
• What you don’t yet know about your topic
• Where you’re looking ( how will you find it)
• What you’ve learned

All of which will help you focus your project! (and maybe save a little time & stress, too!)

• KWHL Chart Use this chart to help organize your project
• KWHL Chart PDF version of the KWHL Chart to help organize your project

Take Notes while You're Searching!

As you're doing your research, take some brief notes about the sources you've found. Noting interesting ideas and items will help you remember what you've read as you put your ideas together to form a research question. It will also help you to make note of parts of your sources that you want to quote later (and find it easily while you're putting your research project together!)

• Stop 'N Jot This tool will help you keep track of good ideas and questions as you do your preliminary research.
• << Previous: Reading (and Understanding) Your Assignment
• Next: Initial Searching >>
• Last Updated: Mar 27, 2024 3:43 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uconn.edu/getstarted

Background Research

What is background research, tyes of background information.

• General Sources
• Subject Specific Sources

Background research (or pre-research) is the research that you do before you start writing your paper or working on your project. Sometimes background research happens before you've even chosen a topic. The purpose of background research is to make the research that goes into your paper or project easier and more successful.

Some reasons to do background research include:

• Determining an appropriate scope for your research: Successful research starts with a topic or question that is appropriate to the scope of the assignment. A topic that is too broad means too much relevant information to review and distill. If your topic is too narrow, there won't be enough information to do meaningful research.
• Understanding how your research fits in with the broader conversation surrounding the topic: What are the major points of view or areas of interest in discussions of your research topic and how does your research fit in with these? Answering this question can help you define the parts of your topic that you need to explore.
• Establishing the value of your research : What is the impact of your research and why does it matter? How might your research clarify or change our understanding of the topic?
• Identifying experts and other important perspectives: Are there scholars whose work you need to understand for your research to be complete? Are there points of view that you need to include or address?

Doing background research helps you choose a topic that you'll be happy with and develop a sense of what research you'll need to do in order to successfully complete your assignment. It will also help you plan your research and understand how much time you'll need to dedicate to understanding and exploring your topic.

Some types of information sources can be particularly helpful when you're doing background research. These are often primarily tertiary sources meaning that, rather than conducting original research they often summarize existing research on the topic.

Current Events Briefs Databases like CQ Researcher are focused on understanding controversial topics in current events. They provide information about the background of the issue as well as explanations of the positions of those on either side of a controversy.

Encyclopedias  Encyclopedias are ideal sources for doing background research in order build your knowledge about a topic sufficiently to identify a topic and develop a research plan.

Dictionaries Dictionaries include both general dictionaries like the Oxford English Dictionary as well as more specialized dictionaries focused on a single area. Dictionary entries are usually shorter and less detailed than encyclopedia entries and generally do not include references. However, they can be helpful when your research introduces you to concepts with which you aren't familiar.

Textbooks Your textbook is a potential source of background information, providing an explanation of the topic that prepares you to focus and dig deeper. Textbooks give a general overview of lot of information.

Statistics While you may find that it's difficult to make sense of statistics related to your topic while you're still exploring, statistics can be a powerful tool for establishing the context and importance of your research.

• Next: General Sources >>
• Last Updated: Nov 13, 2023 3:40 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.odu.edu/background

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Published on 8.5.2024 in Vol 26 (2024)

Characteristic Changes of the Stance-Phase Plantar Pressure Curve When Walking Uphill and Downhill: Cross-Sectional Study

Authors of this article:

Original Paper

• Christian Wolff 1 , MSc   ; 
• Patrick Steinheimer 2 , MSc   ; 
• Elke Warmerdam 3 , MSc, PhD   ; 
• Tim Dahmen 1 , MSc, PhD   ; 
• Philipp Slusallek 1 , MSc, PhD   ; 
• Christian Schlinkmann 1 , MSc   ; 
• Fei Chen 1 , MSc   ; 
• Marcel Orth 2 , MD, PhD   ; 
• Tim Pohlemann 2 , MD, PhD   ; 
• Bergita Ganse 2, 3 , MD, PhD  

1 German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Saarbrücken, Germany

2 Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Departments and Institutes of Surgery, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany

3 Innovative Implant Development (Fracture Healing), Departments and Institutes of Surgery, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany

Corresponding Author:

Bergita Ganse, MD, PhD

Innovative Implant Development (Fracture Healing)

Departments and Institutes of Surgery

Saarland University

Kirrberger Straße 1

Building 57

Homburg/Saar, 66421

Phone: 49 684116 ext 31570

Email: [email protected]

Background: Monitoring of gait patterns by insoles is popular to study behavior and activity in the daily life of people and throughout the rehabilitation process of patients. Live data analyses may improve personalized prevention and treatment regimens, as well as rehabilitation. The M-shaped plantar pressure curve during the stance phase is mainly defined by the loading and unloading slope, 2 maxima, 1 minimum, as well as the force during defined periods. When monitoring gait continuously, walking uphill or downhill could affect this curve in characteristic ways.

Objective: For walking on a slope, typical changes in the stance phase curve measured by insoles were hypothesized.

Methods: In total, 40 healthy participants of both sexes were fitted with individually calibrated insoles with 16 pressure sensors each and a recording frequency of 100 Hz. Participants walked on a treadmill at 4 km/h for 1 minute in each of the following slopes: −20%, −15%, −10%, −5%, 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. Raw data were exported for analyses. A custom-developed data platform was used for data processing and parameter calculation, including step detection, data transformation, and normalization for time by natural cubic spline interpolation and force (proportion of body weight). To identify the time-axis positions of the desired maxima and minimum among the available extremum candidates in each step, a Gaussian filter was applied (σ=3, kernel size 7). Inconclusive extremum candidates were further processed by screening for time plausibility, maximum or minimum pool filtering, and monotony. Several parameters that describe the curve trajectory were computed for each step. The normal distribution of data was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests.

Results: Data were normally distributed. An analysis of variance with the gait parameters as dependent and slope as independent variables revealed significant changes related to the slope for the following parameters of the stance phase curve: the mean force during loading and unloading, the 2 maxima and the minimum, as well as the loading and unloading slope (all P <.001). A simultaneous increase in the loading slope, the first maximum and the mean loading force combined with a decrease in the mean unloading force, the second maximum, and the unloading slope is characteristic for downhill walking. The opposite represents uphill walking. The minimum had its peak at horizontal walking and values dropped when walking uphill and downhill alike. It is therefore not a suitable parameter to distinguish between uphill and downhill walking.

Conclusions: While patient-related factors, such as anthropometrics, injury, or disease shape the stance phase curve on a longer-term scale, walking on slopes leads to temporary and characteristic short-term changes in the curve trajectory.

Introduction

Long-term monitoring of gait patterns and plantar-pressure distributions via insoles are increasingly popular ways to study behavior and activity in the field and in the everyday lives of people and patients, including healing, personalized prevention, and treatment or disease progression [ 1 - 3 ]. In recent years, the usability of instrumented insoles for gait analyses has increased. Several technical issues could be resolved, including calibration, hysteresis and drift, durability, usability, limited energy supply and battery life, data storage capacity, and the restriction to low sample frequencies associated with higher error rates, that is, when force peaks are missed [ 3 - 5 ]. The usability of instrumented insoles is currently still limited by difficulties in data analysis. Advanced algorithms and tools are needed and currently developed to be able to draw meaningful conclusions from such insole gait data [ 6 , 7 ]. When analyzing long-term field data and developing smart health care innovations, automated data annotation is desirable to determine and quantify the activities a person has conducted. Ideally, the activity type can be determined algorithmically from the plantar pressure data alone.

Characteristic gait changes have been reported for walking on slopes, such as changes in the contribution of the ankle joint to leg work [ 8 ]. In addition, uphill walking on a treadmill increases hip and knee flexion angles during the stance phase, as well as the forward tilt of the thorax [ 9 ]. Furthermore, a decrease in dorsiflexion was observed during downhill walking at initial contact, in midstance, and during the second half of the swing phase [ 9 ]. During uphill walking with increasing inclination, more positive joint work was identified for the ankle and hip joint, while negative joint work increased during downhill walking [ 10 ]. Older individuals were shown to have a disproportionate recruitment of hip muscles and smaller increases in activity of the medial gastrocnemius muscle with steeper uphill slopes than younger adults, resulting in difficulty walking on steep slopes [ 11 ].

The M-shaped curve of ground reaction forces or plantar pressure during the stance phase is mainly defined by the loading and unloading slope, 2 maxima, 1 minimum, as well as the force during defined periods [ 12 ]. When monitoring gait continuously via insoles, walking uphill or downhill on a slope could affect the gait cycle curve in characteristic ways. If these typical changes were known, one could correct for such confounders when analyzing insole data. We hypothesized that walking on a slope generates typical changes in the plantar pressure stance phase curve that vary between uphill and downhill walking.

Study Design

This study is part of the project Smart Implants 2.0—Weight-bearing and Gait Observation for Early Monitoring of Fracture Healing and Individualized Therapy after Trauma, funded by the Werner Siemens Foundation. It was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00025108).

Ethical Considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Saarland Medical Board (Ärztekammer des Saarlandes, 30/21).

Data Collection

Inclusion criteria were the ability to walk on a treadmill, and aged 18 years and older. Exclusion criteria were aged under 18 years, use of walking aids, inability to give consent, pregnancy, immobility, and previous injury of the lower legs or pelvis. The aim was to collect data from healthy volunteers.

The healthy participants of both sexes (none of them identified as diverse) were fitted with individually calibrated OpenGO insoles (Moticon GmbH) with 16 pressure sensors in each insole to be used in regular running shoes. Calibration to the individual body weight was conducted using the Moticon OpenGO app by letting the participants walk and shift their body weight in a standardized way. The insole size was selected to fit the individual participant’s shoe size. Measurements were conducted with a recording frequency of 100 Hz in the record mode of the device. Raw data were exported for analyses. The participants walked on a treadmill at 4 km/h (Mercury, HP Cosmos) for 1 minute while insole data were collected with 3-minute breaks for recovery. Recordings were obtained for slopes of −20%, −15%, −10%, −5%, 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. The participants were asked to walk for 1 minute straight, and recording was only commenced when the walking was already in progress to avoid bias by including altered steps upon gait initiation.

Data Processing

The pressure readings of the force sensors in the insole device yield a weighted sum as a total vertical ground reaction force reading. To compute the force, every summand is weighted by its sensor area and a respective scaling factor accounting for the sensor’s surrounding area, as well as gaps between sensors that depend on the insole size. This process is conducted by the Moticon software as an automated processing step before file export. Insole data were exported as described previously [ 13 , 14 ]. A custom-developed data platform was then used for further processing and parameter calculation, in which step detection was conducted as follows. The stance phases were identified and extracted from the time series data by considering any activity with consecutive force readings above 30 N. A tolerance of up to 3 missing values was implemented to account for possible recording issues. Any activity with a duration of less than 300 milliseconds or more than 2000 milliseconds was discarded. Both the force and time axes were normalized. Force readings were transformed from Newton to a proportion of the body weight of the respective participant. Of note, as plantar pressure was measured instead of weight, due to acceleration, values regularly exceeded the body weight for peak load-bearing instances. Normalizing the time axis was more complex, as the lack of a fixed cadence resulted in varying step lengths and thus differing numbers of true measurement points for each step. Therefore, a natural cubic spline interpolation was conducted on the original raw data. Based on the resulting curve for each stance phase, 100 equidistant samples were taken, resulting in an interpolated force measurement point for every 1% of the overall stance phase length. This approach accounted for the lower recording frequency and higher sensor noise inherent to the insoles when compared with other gait measuring devices, such as sensor-equipped treadmills or force plates. Parameters that describe the trajectory of the stance phase curve are usually based on or derived from the characteristic local extrema, that is, the first and second force peak and the local minimum in-between force peaks. These maxima and the minimum are used as parameters themselves to describe the curve trajectory [ 13 ]. Sensor jitter may lead to the existence of multiple ambiguous candidates for the named extrema. As a solution to this, a Gaussian filter was applied to the original raw data in a repetition of the normalization process. The applied filtering strategy (σ=3, kernel size 7) was chosen to prioritize the elimination of extrema ambiguity at the expense of signal precision. This can result in overcorrection in areas with higher signal volatility, mostly at the start and end of the stance phase. Hence, to avoid loss of high-frequency detail, the filtered and normalized curve was not used for parameter analysis, but only to determine unambiguous time-axis positions (indices) for the extremum candidates. These indices were then reapplied to the nonfiltered, normalized data to identify the corresponding plantar pressure measurement closest to the original raw data. In case the use of the filtered data still led to inconclusive extremum candidates, the following additional detection strategies were applied in the named order: (1) time plausibility: extremum candidates occurring within the first or last 10 indices (first/last 10% of overall time span) were eliminated; (2) maximum or minimum-pool filtering: should multiple extremum candidates occur within a pool size of 5 indices (equals to 5% of overall time span), the candidate with the highest or lowest force value was chosen; (3) monotony-check: in case of multiple remaining extremum candidates, candidates where the curve did not display a strict monotonous decrease or increase in both directions within 5 indices each were eliminated; and (4) monotony grace: in case the monotony check had eliminated too many candidates (less than 2 maximum candidates or less than 1 minimum candidate remaining), the eliminated candidates were reinstated in descending order of their highest achieved monotony distance until the target number of candidates was reached.

After applying these strategies, every stance activity that remained with an irregular amount of unambiguous extremum candidates was removed from the data set. In total, 585 load-bearing events were excluded as not fitting the strict parameter definitions.

For each participant, across the minute of walking all stance phase curves were extracted. The parameters illustrated in Figure 1 were calculated for each stance phase and used to analyze changes in the trajectory of the stance phase curve. To do so, data from both feet were pooled. The curve is mainly described by 2 maxima and a minimum in between the maxima, Fz2 (the first maximum), Fz3 (the minimum), and Fz4 (the second maximum). The mean force over the entire stance phase is referred to as Fmean stance . The mean force between the start of the loading phase and Fz2 is Fmean load . The mean force between Fz2 and Fz4 is Fmean mid . The mean force between Fz4 and the end of the unloading phase is Fmean unload . All these parameters have the unit percent body weight. In addition, the loading and unloading slope have the units percent body weight or percent stance phase duration. The loading slope was computed as the slope of the line defined by the start of the loading phase and the first force reading equal to or higher than 80% of Fz2. The unloading slope was calculated as the slope of the line defined by the first force reading in the unloading phase below 80% of Fz4 and the end of the stance phase event.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical tests were executed with SPSS Statistics (version 29; IBM Corp). Significance was defined as P <.05. The normal distribution of data was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. A linear regression analysis of variance was conducted for each of the gait parameters as the dependent variable, with the slope (−20% to 20%) as the independent variable. Mean values and SD are reported. Linear regression slopes are reported for comparability and to allow for correction, even though for some of the parameters other but differing regression types yielded higher R 2 values. The sample size of 40 was an estimate based on what is common in the field, and taking into account the aim to measure a very diverse group of volunteers. An a priori sample size calculation was not conducted due to a lack of comparable data.

Measurements were taken from 40 healthy participants (19 women and 21 men) with an average age of 43.90 (SD 17.30, range 18-87) years. Participant characteristics are summarized in Table 1 . Data were successfully recorded for all of the participants and slope levels, resulting in a complete data set ( Multimedia Appendix 1 ).

Data were normally distributed. Figure 2 visualizes the differences between the analyzed slope values on the stance phase curve. Figure 3 shows the normalized changes in the analyzed parameters with the slope of the treadmill. The analysis of variance revealed significant changes with the slope for Fmean load , Fmean unload , Fz2, Fz3, Fz4, loading and unloading slope (all P <.001). There was no significant correlation of the slope with Fmean stance ( P =.98) and Fmean mid ( P =.13). Other than the other parameters with significant changes related to slope, Fz3 had its peak at horizontal walking and values dropped when walking uphill and downhill alike. Thus, a simultaneous and short-term increase in loading slope and Fmean load combined with a decrease in Fmean unload , Fz2, Fz4, and the unloading slope indicates downhill walking, while the opposite indicates uphill walking. Fz3 is not a suitable parameter to distinguish between uphill and downhill walking, as its value decreases both when walking uphill as well as downhill. Mean values and the SD of the analyzed parameters for each treadmill slope level in absolute values are displayed in Table 2 . Table 3 indicates the linear regression slopes and R 2 -values for each of the curves shown in Figure 3 .

a Fmean stance : the mean force over the entire stance phase.

b Fmean load : the mean force between the start of the loading phase and Fz2.

c Fmean mid : the mean force between Fz2 and Fz4.

d Fmean unload : the mean force between Fz4 and the end of the unloading phase.

e Fz2: the first maximum.

f Fz3: the minimum.

g Fz4: the second maximum.

Principal Results

This study identified characteristic changes when walking with an uphill or downhill slope in insole plantar pressure data of healthy participants. The most pronounced changes with treadmill slope were found in the loading slope of the curve. A typical combination of changes in several parameters was reported that defines uphill and downhill walking and may be used for annotation and correction when analyzing such data. These changes in the trajectory of the force curve with different surface slopes relative to the force vector of Earth’s gravity are related to changes in plantar load distribution. When walking downhill, Fz2 was found to be higher compared to when walking uphill, which is caused by the more pronounced force transfer through the heel of the foot, followed by a lower second maximum due to the even lower surface at push-off.

While patient-related factors, such as curve characteristics related to body size, muscle power, degenerative disease, etc, would remain constant throughout an insole measurement, fatigue-related changes [ 15 ] may increasingly appear and then stay toward the later stages of a recording of a walking bout. Additionally, age, body height, body weight, BMI, and handgrip strength were shown to cause characteristic changes in the plantar pressure force curve, that would usually only change on a long-term scale [ 16 ]. In contrast, as shown in the present data set, walking on slopes leads to temporary and characteristic changes in specific properties of the stance-phase curve. Changes over time in the identified parameters should thus be considered and correctly interpreted when studying long-term field gait data collected via insoles. To analyze the healing process, that is, after an injury, slow changes in parameters would be expected, and a trend toward what is considered normal over several weeks [ 17 ]. Short-term changes over minutes or hours would thus not be explainable by the healing progress and should have a different cause. In addition, the asymmetry between the legs should slowly decrease throughout healing [ 18 ]. When walking on a slope, asymmetry could also be affected, if the injury causes increasing problems such as pain when walking uphill or downhill. It is also recommendable to identify the characteristics of walking with walking aids, such as crutches, to be able to classify the nature of the observed changes and the treatment stage better.

Limitations

Effects of walking speed were not analyzed in this study, even though it is known that lower extremity joint loading is affected by varying step length and cadence during graded uphill and downhill walking [ 19 ]. These parameters, however, do not seem to be necessary to successfully annotate gait data obtained by insoles. For participant or patient convenience, it would be desirable if insoles did not need to be combined with further devices or wearables. The present data suggest that at least the identification of walking on slopes does not require further sensors. It is also known that kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic parameters differ between treadmill walking and overground gait, while spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic, electromyographic, and energy consumption outcome measures are largely comparable [ 20 ]. Another limitation of this study is that the parameters analyzed here can only be used when a regular gait curve is present. If this is not the case, other methods need to be applied, that is, machine learning for step detection and segmentation or the analysis of further parameters, possibly slopes and averages, or differences between individual sensors [ 21 ]. Differences between the 16 sensors embedded in each insole were not analyzed in this study and could be assessed in the future, for example, to distinguish between ground types (gravel, sand, etc). Another limitation is that the present characteristic changes that were assessed in healthy participants may differ for patients with gait disorders, depending on their disease or injury type. It will therefore be important to collect longitudinal data on different slopes from patients with defined diseases and injuries throughout the healing process or throughout different disease stages. These studies would serve to identify if the reported findings are valid also for patients, and for which patient groups this is true.

Use of Wearables in Patients

The insole technology and present data may be valuable in real-world settings when investigating changes in mechanical properties during walking, that is, in occupational health research, sport and exercise science, for urban planning, and to plan inclusive architecture. For instance, the global average slope of urban areas is about 3.70° [ 22 ]. Wearables such as pressure insoles are increasingly used to study gait and movement, as well as for fall detection, fall classification, and fall risk assessment in the daily life of patients, and furthermore for lifestyle and health monitoring [ 1 , 3 , 23 - 27 ]. Long-term monitoring, especially if combined with additional sensors, may produce large amounts of data that require advanced strategies for analyses. Apart from regression statistics, among the options is the use of machine learning algorithms trained with annotated data for pattern recognition [ 24 , 26 ]. For longer-term monitoring of patients, it would be desirable if such algorithms were trained to identify various key activities of daily life that might indicate the level of healing progress. For example, when a patient with a tibial fracture is capable of cycling again, this is likely an indication for advances in the healing process. It would also be of interest to identify risky behavior, possibly leading to excessive forces, and to warn the patient by giving, for example, an audible or haptic warning signal. To guarantee meaningful data interpretation, machine learning may be combined with conventional regression-based analyses, such as the ones proposed in this paper to best tackle data complexity. Furthermore, prediction algorithms could be implemented for falls and diseases that enable more refined individual recommendations. Ideally, such interventions would be based on live data analyses. Limitations in the computing power of small wearable devices can increasingly be mitigated by both algorithmic optimization techniques in machine learning, such as dimensionality reduction, reservoir computing, and network pruning, as well as hardware innovations [ 27 , 28 ]. In the near future, such advances will likely allow real-time feedback based on data from various sources combined [ 29 , 30 ]. Alternatively, extracting decision-making systems (symbolic artificial intelligence), such as threshold-based methods, might offer an immediate route to real-time feedback.

Sensors in Orthoses and Implants

Apart from insoles, very similar data might be collected from mechanical sensors embedded in orthoses [ 31 ] or implants [ 32 ]. Potentially, walking on a slope in these recordings changes the data in similar ways as described here. It would be highly desirable if patients did not need to use separate wearables such as insoles anymore, but if orthoses and implants had sensors embedded, not only to monitor healing progress but also to identify healing problems or complications and the need for surgical revision [ 33 ]. If similar load data could be collected by sensors in artificial hip or knee joints, or potentially even by plates or nails that stabilize bone fractures, recovery regimen could be monitored continuously and advice given on time [ 34 ]. Alarms could go off if forces exceeded certain thresholds or if live pattern analyses revealed unfavorable patterns known to be associated with exceeding forces or problems. As these developments seem to have a high potential with regard to rehabilitation and postoperative treatment, data analyses of insole data should be further studied and ideally, details such as algorithms and characteristics should be published to enable for the further development and widespread application of the named interventions.

Conclusions

Characteristic changes in the plantar-pressure stance phase curve were identified, which reflect uphill and downhill walking. Automated annotation and continuous analyses of gait data via wearables could enable improved rehabilitation and feedback systems for prevention and treatment. A combination of traditional regression statistics embedded in heuristics combined with artificial intelligence methods may yield the best results.

Acknowledgments

The Werner Siemens Foundation (project Smart Implants 2.0) funded this work. The authors would like to acknowledge the help of Aynur Gökten and Jacqueline Orth during the measurements, as well as the help of Lisa-Marie Jost in designing Figure 1 .

Authors' Contributions

CW contributed to the data processing platform, data analysis, methods, and Figure 2 . P Steinheimer conducted the measurements. BG contributed to the idea; ran the statistical analyses; interpreted the data; made the tables; and drafted, submitted, and revised this paper. TD, CS, and FC took part in the data platform implementation. EW, TD, P Slusallek, CS, FC, MO, and TP helped with data interpretation. All authors have contributed to this paper’s drafting and revision, and read and approved the submitted version of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

TP is President and Board Member of the AO-Foundation, Switzerland, and Extended Board Member of the German Society of Orthopedic Trauma Surgery (DGU), the German Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (DGOU), and the German Society of Surgery (DGCH). TP is also the speaker of the Medical Advisory Board of the German Ministry of Defence. The other authors do not have a conflict of interest.

• Braun BJ, Veith NT, Rollmann M, Orth M, Fritz T, Herath SC, et al. Weight-bearing recommendations after operative fracture treatment-fact or fiction? Gait results with and feasibility of a dynamic, continuous pedobarography insole. Int Orthop. 2017;41(8):1507-1512. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Ramirez-Bautista JA, Huerta-Ruelas JA, Chaparro-Cardenas SL, Hernandez-Zavala A. A review in detection and monitoring gait disorders using in-shoe plantar measurement systems. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;10:299-309. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Subramaniam S, Majumder S, Faisal AI, Deen MJ. Insole-based systems for health monitoring: current solutions and research challenges. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(2):438. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Elstub LJ, Grohowski LM, Wolf DN, Owen MK, Noehren B, Zelik KE. Effect of pressure insole sampling frequency on insole-measured peak force accuracy during running. J Biomech. 2022;145:111387. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• North K, Kubiak EN, Hitchcock RW. Sensor packaging design for continuous underfoot load monitoring. Biomed Microdevices. 2012;14(1):217-224. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Anderson W, Choffin Z, Jeong N, Callihan M, Jeong S, Sazonov E. Empirical study on human movement classification using insole footwear sensor system and machine learning. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(7):2743. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Chatzaki C, Skaramagkas V, Kefalopoulou Z, Tachos N, Kostikis N, Kanellos F, et al. Can gait features help in differentiating Parkinson's disease medication states and severity levels? A machine learning approach. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(24):9937. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Montgomery JR, Grabowski AM. The contributions of ankle, knee and hip joint work to individual leg work change during uphill and downhill walking over a range of speeds. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5(8):180550. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Strutzenberger G, Leutgeb L, Claußen L, Schwameder H. Gait on slopes: differences in temporo-spatial, kinematic and kinetic gait parameters between walking on a ramp and on a treadmill. Gait Posture. 2022;91:73-78. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Alexander N, Strutzenberger G, Ameshofer LM, Schwameder H. Lower limb joint work and joint work contribution during downhill and uphill walking at different inclinations. J Biomech. 2017;61:75-80. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Franz JR, Kram R. How does age affect leg muscle activity/coactivity during uphill and downhill walking? Gait Posture. 2013;37(3):378-384. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Larsen AH, Puggaard L, Hämäläinen U, Aagaard P. Comparison of ground reaction forces and antagonist muscle coactivation during stair walking with ageing. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18(4):568-580. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Braun BJ, Veith NT, Hell R, Döbele S, Roland M, Rollmann M, et al. Validation and reliability testing of a new, fully integrated gait analysis insole. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8:54. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Stöggl T, Martiner A. Validation of Moticon's OpenGo sensor insoles during gait, jumps, balance and cross-country skiing specific imitation movements. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(2):196-206. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Chardon M, Barbieri FA, Penedo T, Santos PCR, Vuillerme N. The effects of experimentally-induced fatigue on gait parameters during obstacle crossing: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;142:104854. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Wolff C, Steinheimer P, Warmerdam E, Dahmen T, Slusallek P, Schlinkmann C, et al. Effects of age, body height, body weight, body mass index and handgrip strength on the trajectory of the plantar pressure stance-phase curve of the gait cycle. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1110099. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Agres AN, Alves SA, Höntzsch D, El Attal R, Pohlemann T, Schaser KD, et al. Improved weight bearing during gait at 6 weeks post-surgery with an angle stable locking system after distal tibial fracture. Gait Posture. 2024;107:169-176. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Rosenbaum D, Macri F, Lupselo FS, Preis OC. Gait and function as tools for the assessment of fracture repair—the role of movement analysis for the assessment of fracture healing. Injury. 2014;45(Suppl 2):S39-S43. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Schwameder H, Lindenhofer E, Müller E. Effect of walking speed on lower extremity joint loading in graded ramp walking. Sports Biomech. 2005;4(2):227-243. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Semaan MB, Wallard L, Ruiz V, Gillet C, Leteneur S, Simoneau-Buessinger E. Is treadmill walking biomechanically comparable to overground walking? A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2022;92:249-257. [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Blades S, Marriott H, Hundza S, Honert EC, Stellingwerff T, Klimstra M. Evaluation of different pressure-based foot contact event detection algorithms across different slopes and speeds. Sensors (Basel). 2023;23(5):2736. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Shi K, Liu G, Zhou L, Cui Y, Liu S, Wu Y. Satellite remote sensing data reveal increased slope climbing of urban land expansion worldwide. Landsc Urban Plan. 2023;235:104755. [ CrossRef ]
• Cates B, Sim T, Heo HM, Kim B, Kim H, Mun JH. A novel detection model and its optimal features to classify falls from low- and high-acceleration activities of daily life using an insole sensor system. Sensors (Basel). 2018;18(4):1227. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Kraus M, Saller MM, Baumbach SF, Neuerburg C, Stumpf UC, Böcker W, et al. Prediction of physical frailty in orthogeriatric patients using sensor insole-based gait analysis and machine learning algorithms: cross-sectional study. JMIR Med Inform. 2022;10(1):e32724. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Subramaniam S, Faisal AI, Deen MJ. Wearable sensor systems for fall risk assessment: a review. Front Digit Health. 2022;4:921506. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Harris EJ, Khoo IH, Demircan E. A survey of human gait-based artificial intelligence applications. Front Robot AI. 2022;8:749274. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Hou CKJ, Behdinan K. Dimensionality reduction in surrogate modeling: a review of combined methods. Data Sci Eng. 2022;7(4):402-427. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Tanaka G, Yamane T, Héroux JB, Nakane R, Kanazawa N, Takeda S, et al. Recent advances in physical reservoir computing: a review. Neural Netw. 2019;115:100-123. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Chiasson-Poirier L, Younesian H, Turcot K, Sylvestre J. Detecting gait events from accelerations using reservoir computing. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(19):7180. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Zhang Q, Jin T, Cai J, Xu L, He T, Wang T, et al. Wearable triboelectric sensors enabled gait analysis and waist motion capture for IoT-Based smart healthcare applications. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022;9(4):e2103694. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Moreira L, Figueiredo J, Cerqueira J, Santos CP. A review on locomotion mode recognition and prediction when using active orthoses and exoskeletons. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(19):7109. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Alves SA, Polzehl J, Brisson NM, Bender A, Agres AN, Damm P, et al. Ground reaction forces and external hip joint moments predict in vivo hip contact forces during gait. J Biomech. 2022;135:111037. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Warmerdam E, Orth M, Pohlemann T, Ganse B. Gait analysis to monitor fracture healing of the lower leg. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023;10(2):255. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]
• Ganse B, Orth M, Roland M, Diebels S, Motzki P, Seelecke S, et al. Concepts and clinical aspects of active implants for the treatment of bone fractures. Acta Biomater. 2022;146:1-9. [ FREE Full text ] [ CrossRef ] [ Medline ]

Abbreviations

Edited by G Eysenbach, T Leung; submitted 24.01.23; peer-reviewed by M Kraus, S Okita; comments to author 21.12.23; revised version received 11.01.24; accepted 17.02.24; published 08.05.24.

©Christian Wolff, Patrick Steinheimer, Elke Warmerdam, Tim Dahmen, Philipp Slusallek, Christian Schlinkmann, Fei Chen, Marcel Orth, Tim Pohlemann, Bergita Ganse. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 08.05.2024.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.