What’s Required Based on Size of Project
(short duration; 2-4 members of project team)
(duration of several weeks to several months; medium-sized project team)
(duration of year or more; large project team)
Many risk management experts emphasize that an organization’s project risk management plans might not change much from project to project. That’s because the plan sets out particulars that will be followed for all projects.
“Remember, it's just an approach document that answers the question: How?” says Kris Reynolds, Founder and CEO of Arrowhead Consulting in Tulsa, Oklahoma. “The company or the department as a whole should have a single risk management plan that gets built as you're building your project management methodology. And it’s your Bible. It’s your guidebook.
“But it isn't going to change across projects,” Reynolds continues. “What changes are the artifacts, including the risk register. But your approach of how you're going to address risk or analyze risk or plan for risk is in the project risk management plan document. As a company or organization, you create that document, and it exists for a year or two years without changing.”
To create a project risk management plan, your team should gather important documents and decide on an approach for assessing and responding to risks. This process involves gathering support documents, listing potential risk management tools, and more.
Consider some of these basic steps and factors as you begin creating the project risk management plan:
After your project team has gathered documents and done other preparation work, you will want to follow nine basic steps in creating a project risk management plan. Those start with identifying and assessing risks.
Here are details on the nine steps of project risk management to keep in mind while drafting your project risk management plan:
Examples of project risk management plans can help your team understand what information to include in a plan. The risk management plan can also detail various components that will be part of your team’s risk management.
Download the Sample Project Risk Management Plan Template for Microsoft Word
Download this sample project risk management plan, which includes primary components that might be described in a project risk management plan, such as details on risk identification, risk mitigation, and risk tracking and reporting.
Download the Blank Project Risk Management Plan for Microsoft Word
Use this blank template to create your own project risk management plan. The template includes sections to ensure that your team covers all areas of risk management, such as risk identification, risk assessment, and risk mitigation. Customize the template based on your needs.
Download the Sample Project Risk Register for Excel
This sample project risk register gives your team a better understanding of the information that a risk register should include to help the team understand and deal with risks. This sample includes potential risks that a project manager might track for a construction project.
Download the Blank Project Risk Register Template for Excel
Use this project risk register template to help your team identify, track, and plan for project risks. The template includes columns for categorizing risks, providing risk descriptions, determining a risk severity score, and more.
Download the Sample Quantitative Project Risk Impact Matrix for Excel
This sample quantitative project risk impact matrix template can help your team assess a project risk based on quantitative measures, such as potential monetary cost to the project. The template includes columns where your team can assess and track the probability and potential cost of each project risk. The template calculates a total monetary risk impact based on your estimates of probability and cost.
Download the Risk Breakdown Structure Template for Excel
Your team can use this template to create a risk breakdown structure diagram that shows different types of risks that could affect a project. The template helps your team organize risks into broad categories.
Below are step-by-step instructions on how to fill out a project risk management plan template. Follow these steps to help you and your team understand the information needed in an effective risk management plan.
This template is based on a project risk management plan template created by Arrowhead Consulting of Tulsa, Oklahoma, and was shared with us by Kris Reynolds.
Experts say that complex projects shouldn’t require more complex project risk management plans. A project might have more complex tools, such as a more detailed risk register, but the risk management plan should cover the same basics for all projects.
“The problem is, most people get these management plans confused. They then start lumping in the artifacts [such as risk registers] — which can be more complex and have more detail — to the risk management plan itself,” says Reynolds. “You want it to be easily understood and easily followed.
“I don't think the complexity of the project changes the risk management plan,” Reynolds says. “You may have to circulate the plan to more people. You may have to meet more frequently. You may have to use quantitative risk analysis. That would be more complex with more complex projects. But the management plan itself — no.”
From simple task management and project planning to complex resource and portfolio management, Smartsheet helps you improve collaboration and increase work velocity -- empowering you to get more done.
The Smartsheet platform makes it easy to plan, capture, manage, and report on work from anywhere, helping your team be more effective and get more done. Report on key metrics and get real-time visibility into work as it happens with roll-up reports, dashboards, and automated workflows built to keep your team connected and informed.
When teams have clarity into the work getting done, there’s no telling how much more they can accomplish in the same amount of time. Try Smartsheet for free, today.
Free risk mitigation plan templates.
Identify and address potential risks to your organization with a risk mitigation plan template.
You can use this template for planning mitigation actions to reduce or eliminate risks in your workplace. It allows you to define potential risks and identify solutions to prevent negative impacts on the operations. Use this template to do the following actions:
A risk mitigation plan is a tool used to determine specific actions in response to risks. It defines potential threats, assesses their potential impacts, and decides on steps to mitigate their effects. Having this plan on hand helps teams select the best route to reduce the negative impact of risks on their organization and keep them at a minimum or manageable level.
A risk mitigation plan aims to eliminate, manage , or minimize the impact of risks that can negatively affect a project or business. In accomplishing this, it weighs the consequences of each risk, prioritizes them according to their risk levels, and strategizes in response to their impacts. By acknowledging the inevitability of certain threats, teams can plan around those risks to lessen their adverse effects.
A risk mitigation plan offers several advantages to project teams and organizations. It serves as a guide in managing and reducing risks through established procedures. By noting several approaches to risks ahead of time, organizations can better prepare in handling the risks.
Aside from this, having a readily available mitigation plan helps teams reach effective business decisions. Risk mitigation planning allows them to spot loopholes in the processes that could trigger these risks and respond before they worsen. Because they understand the risks and have planned accordingly, teams can achieve their goals and targets.
Risk mitigation involves different methods depending on the likelihood and impact of any given risk. This section discusses the five risk mitigation strategies and examples of how project teams can explore and use them for their operations.
The acceptance strategy begins by acknowledging risks and determining which are acceptable from the pool of threats. By bringing them into attention, a team can reach a common understanding of what these risks entail. Teams can also set a period for accepting these risks to prioritize efforts in mitigating other risks.
For example, they can outline risks that could hinder them from meeting project deadlines.
Teams can also mitigate risks by avoiding exposure to it as much as possible. This type of strategy takes on a preventive approach as opposed to the previous strategy. It lets teams plan steps to avoid threats and their impacts. Teams can avoid risks by adjusting specific project requirements, whether in operations, costs, or scheduling.
For example, they can choose not to participate in certain activities to prevent being exposed to the threat.
The control strategy aims to remove, limit, or manage the impact or likelihood of threats. It carries out actions to reduce the project’s exposure to certain risks.
For example, teams can employ time-tracking and time management tools to monitor how much time it takes to accomplish tasks in a project. Doing so can help them mitigate any risk to the project timeline.
This risk mitigation strategy involves carefully watching potential risks for any noticeable change in their impact. Teams dedicate a specific period to observe indicated risks. If they spot any alarming changes that can negatively impact the project, they can act accordingly.
An example of this is holding periodic updates to assess the status and timeline of tasks.
Lastly, teams can mitigate risks by handing them over to a willing party. It means transferring the risks and associated consequences to a stakeholder who can deal with them. When doing this, it’s important to make sure that the conditions are acceptable for all the parties involved.
A great example of this is outsourcing providers outside the company for tasks such as customer services.
A risk mitigation plan template should consist of the following parts:
After learning about the components of a risk mitigation plan template, it’s time to put them into action. This section walks you through the writing process of a risk mitigation plan and the subsequent steps to take during its implementation.
It should cover all potential threats to the project, from those crucial to the operations to those affecting the team on a broader scale. Present a detailed description of the risk, including its root cause(s) and impact(s) on your project.
The next step is to evaluate the risks based on how they impact your project and how likely they will occur. A risk assessment plan enables you to quantify risk levels in your organization. Choose a risk matrix that applies best to your project needs.
This method lets you decide how to respond to each risk and its impact. You can start by establishing a manageable level of risk and defining critical points in your operations. After this, determine the appropriate strategies to respond to those risks.
Risk mitigation planning doesn’t stop when the plan is complete. It’s important to keep an eye on the risks as they change in relevance or impact. Set clear, well-defined metrics to detect any changes in the threats.
An effective mitigation strategy requires constant re-evaluation and improvement. Periodically revisit the plan’s success in mitigating risks. If the planned approach isn’t working, it’s best to change the course of action.
Risk assessment template.
Use this template to identify and evaluate hazard and control measures in the workplace. Discuss risks in workplace activities, provide photo documentation, and rate them using a risk matrix. Establish control procedures to mitigate the risk and proactively keep your workplace safe with this template.
This template lets you define, assess, handle, and track risks throughout the project lifecycle. List down potential threats and rate them according to their seriousness, likelihood, and overall grade. Outline appropriate mitigation strategies, provide sufficient documentation and monitor risks over time using the template.
Use this template to assess your readiness to comply with ISO 31000:2018’s risk management standards. Customize this template, its scoring, and response sets according to your business needs. Find and bridge any gaps in your workplace protocols, define strategies to reduce threats, and establish a robust risk management system with this tool.
Leizel Estrellas
How risk control works, utilizing a risk and control matrix (racm) for effective risk management, examples of risk control, the bottom line.
Investopedia / Sabrina Jiang
Risk control is the set of methods by which firms evaluate potential losses and take action to reduce or eliminate such threats. It is a technique that utilizes findings from risk assessments , which involve identifying potential risk factors in a company's operations, such as technical and non-technical aspects of the business, financial policies and other issues that may affect the well-being of the firm.
Risk control also implements proactive changes to reduce risk in these areas. Risk control thus helps companies limit loss. Risk control is a key component of a company's enterprise risk management (ERM) protocol.
Modern businesses face a diverse collection of obstacles, competitors, and potential dangers. Risk control is a plan-based business strategy that aims to identify, assess, and prepare for any dangers, hazards, and other potentials for disaster—both physical and figurative—that may interfere with an organization's operations and objectives. The core concepts of risk control include:
No one risk control technique will be a golden bullet to keep a company free from potential harm. In practice, these techniques are used in tandem with others to varying degrees and will change as the corporation grows, as the economy changes, and as the competitive landscape shifts.
A Risk and Control Matrix (RACM) is a valuable tool used by organizations to better understand and optimize their risk profiles. It is a structured approach that helps companies identify, assess, and manage risks by mapping the relationships between potential risks and the corresponding control measures implemented to mitigate them. The RACM allows organizations to visualize and evaluate the effectiveness of their risk control strategies and make data-driven decisions to enhance their risk management practices.
The RACM typically includes the following components:
By creating and maintaining an up-to-date RACM, organizations can gain a comprehensive understanding of their risk landscape and the effectiveness of their risk control measures. This information can inform strategic decision-making, guide resource allocation, and support continuous improvement in risk management practices.
Example of a Hypothetical RCAM | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Area | Risk Description | Likelihood | Impact | Risk Rating | Control Measure | Control Effectiveness | Action Plan |
Finance | Fraudulent transactions | Medium | High | High | Implement strong access controls | Effective | Regularly review access controls |
Regular audits and reconciliations | Effective | Increase audit frequency | |||||
HR | Employee data breach | Low | High | Medium | Secure storage and encryption of data | Effective | Monitor for new security threats |
Employee training on data privacy practices | Partially effective | Enhance training program | |||||
Operations | Supply chain disruption | High | High | High | Diversify suppliers and sources | Effective | Expand supplier network |
Maintain inventory safety stock | Effective | Adjust safety stock levels | |||||
IT | Cybersecurity attacks | High | High | High | Regular security updates and patches | Effective | Increase frequency of updates |
Employee training on cybersecurity practices | Partially effective | Improve training content |
This RCAM example outlines different risk categories, such as Finance, HR, Operations, and IT, and includes specific risks within each category. The likelihood and impact of each risk are assessed, leading to an overall risk rating. Control measures are then listed, along with an evaluation of their effectiveness. Finally, action plans are proposed to enhance risk control measures or address identified gaps in risk management.
Keep in mind that this is just a simplified example, and an actual RACM for an organization would likely be more detailed and cover a broader range of risks and controls.
As part of Sumitomo Electric’s risk management efforts, the company developed business continuity plans (BCPs) in fiscal 2008 as a means of ensuring that core business activities could continue in the event of a disaster. The BCPs played a role in responding to issues caused by the Great East Japan earthquake that occurred in March 2011. Because the quake caused massive damage on an unprecedented scale, far surpassing the damage assumed in the BCPs, some areas of the plans did not reach their goals.
Based on lessons learned from the company’s response to the earthquake, executives continue promoting practical drills and training programs, confirming the effectiveness of the plans and improving them as needed.
British Petroleum (BP) has implemented several risk control measures following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which was one of the largest environmental disasters in history. As a result of the spill, BP was subject to a $20.8 billion settlement with the U.S. government and five Gulf states in 2015. The company has since strengthened its risk management approach to prevent similar incidents in the future.
BP has focused on improving its safety culture, including conducting regular safety training and drills for employees, investing in advanced technology for better monitoring and control of drilling operations, and implementing rigorous safety standards across its global operations. The company has also adopted a systematic approach to risk assessment and management, which involves identifying, evaluating, and prioritizing risks and developing tailored risk control strategies to mitigate potential impacts.
Moreover, BP has increased its efforts to promote transparency and stakeholder engagement. The company now publishes an annual sustainability report that provides detailed information on its safety, environmental, and social performance, as well as its progress in implementing risk control measures. This openness allows stakeholders to hold the company accountable for its actions and fosters a culture of continuous improvement in risk management.
Starbucks, a leading global coffee retailer, has implemented various risk control measures to manage its supply chain risks. The company sources coffee beans from multiple regions worldwide, making it vulnerable to fluctuations in supply and potential disruptions due to weather, political instability, or other unforeseen events.
To address these risks, Starbucks has adopted a diversified sourcing strategy, which involves procuring coffee beans from a wide range of suppliers across different regions. This approach helps the company reduce its reliance on any single supplier or region, ensuring a steady supply of raw materials and minimizing the impact of potential disruptions.
Furthermore, Starbucks has established a comprehensive set of supply chain standards, known as the Coffee and Farmer Equity (C.A.F.E.) Practices. These standards cover various aspects of coffee production, including quality, environmental sustainability, and social responsibility. By working closely with its suppliers and conducting regular audits, Starbucks can ensure compliance with these standards, thereby minimizing the risk of reputational damage and potential supply chain disruptions.
In addition, Starbucks uses advanced supply chain management software to monitor its global supply chain in real-time, enabling the company to identify potential risks early and take appropriate action to mitigate them. This proactive approach to risk control has helped Starbucks maintain its reputation for high-quality coffee and build a resilient, sustainable supply chain that supports its continued growth.
Risk control is a subset of risk management. While risk management is the overarching process of identifying, assessing, and prioritizing risks to an organization, risk control focuses specifically on implementing strategies to mitigate or eliminate the identified risks. Risk management typically involves the development of an overall risk management plan, whereas risk control addresses the techniques and tactics employed to minimize potential losses and protect the organization.
No, it is not possible to eliminate all risks completely. Risk control aims to minimize and manage risks, but it cannot remove them entirely. Some risks are inherent in the business environment or the nature of the industry, while others may arise from unforeseen circumstances. The goal of risk control is to reduce the likelihood and potential impact of risks on the organization, helping to build resilience and maintain stability in the face of uncertainty.
Emerging risks can be challenging to identify, as they often involve novel or rapidly changing situations. Companies can employ various strategies to detect and monitor emerging risks, such as:
Risk control and corporate social responsibility (CSR) are interconnected in several ways. By implementing risk control measures, companies can minimize potential harm to stakeholders, such as employees, customers, and the environment. This proactive approach to risk management aligns with the principles of CSR, which emphasize the importance of ethical and sustainable business practices. Additionally, effective risk control can help protect a company's reputation and maintain public trust, which are crucial aspects of CSR. In short, risk control is an essential component of a comprehensive CSR strategy, as it helps companies meet their social, environmental, and ethical obligations while ensuring long-term success and sustainability.
Risk control is a critical part of modern business management, enabling companies to identify, assess, and mitigate potential hazards and threats to their operations and objectives. By implementing a combination of risk control techniques, such as avoidance, loss prevention, loss reduction, separation, duplication, and diversification, businesses can minimize their exposure to risks and enhance their resilience. Real-world examples, such as British Petroleum's post-Deepwater Horizon safety measures and Starbucks' supply chain management strategies, demonstrate the importance and effectiveness of robust risk control measures. As the business environment continues to evolve, companies must remain vigilant and adaptive in their risk control efforts to ensure long-term success and sustainability.
Sumitomo Electric. " Risk Management ."
NOAA. " Deepwater Horizon oil spill settlements: Where the money went ."
NC State University. " How Did BP’s Risk Management Lead to Failure ?"
Reuters. " Slack management exposed BP to high safety risk -leaked report ."
British Petroleum. " Safety and Operational Risk Update ."
SKF Corp. " Starbucks: An analysis of supply chain risk and mitigation strategies ."
New York Times. " Starbucks, Flush With Customers, Is Running Low on Ingredients. "
Solatech. " Starbucks: An analysis of supply chain risk and mitigation strategies ."
Harvard University. " Starbucks global supply chain and climate change ."
Supply Chain Drive. " Starbucks’ real-time alerts allow for disruption response in days, not weeks ."
Intel reports second-quarter 2024 financial results; announces $10 billion cost reduction plan to increase efficiency and market competitiveness, related documents.
NEWS SUMMARY
SANTA CLARA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Intel Corporation today reported second-quarter 2024 financial results.
“Our Q2 financial performance was disappointing, even as we hit key product and process technology milestones. Second-half trends are more challenging than we previously expected, and we are leveraging our new operating model to take decisive actions that will improve operating and capital efficiencies while accelerating our IDM 2.0 transformation,” said Pat Gelsinger, Intel CEO. “These actions, combined with the launch of Intel 18A next year to regain process technology leadership, will strengthen our position in the market, improve our profitability and create shareholder value.”
“Second-quarter results were impacted by gross margin headwinds from the accelerated ramp of our AI PC product, higher than typical charges related to non-core businesses and the impact from unused capacity,” said David Zinsner, Intel CFO. “By implementing our spending reductions, we are taking proactive steps to improve our profits and strengthen our balance sheet. We expect these actions to meaningfully improve liquidity and reduce our debt balance while enabling us to make the right investments to drive long-term value for shareholders.”
Cost-Reduction Plan
As Intel nears the completion of rebuilding a sustainable engine of process technology leadership, it announced a series of initiatives to create a sustainable financial engine that accelerates profitable growth, enables further operational efficiency and agility, and creates capacity for ongoing strategic investment in technology and manufacturing leadership. These initiatives follow the establishment of separate financial reporting for Intel Products and Intel Foundry, which provides a "clean sheet" view of the business and has uncovered significant opportunities to drive meaningful operational and cost efficiencies. The actions include structural and operating realignment across the company, headcount reductions, and operating expense and capital expenditure reductions of more than $10 billion in 2025 compared to previous estimates. As a result of these actions, Intel aims to achieve clear line of sight toward a sustainable business model with the ongoing financial resources and liquidity needed to support the company’s long-term strategy.
The plan will enable the next phase of the company’s multiyear transformation strategy, and is focused on four key priorities:
Intel is taking the added step of suspending the dividend starting in the fourth quarter, recognizing the importance of prioritizing liquidity to support the investments needed to execute its strategy. The company reiterates its long-term commitment to a competitive dividend as cash flows improve to sustainably higher levels.
Q2 2024 Financial Highlights
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Revenue ($B) | $12.8 | $12.9 | down 1% |
|
|
| ||||||
Gross Margin | 35.4% | 35.8% | down 0.4 ppt | 38.7% | 39.8% | down 1.1 ppts | ||||||
R&D and MG&A ($B) | $5.6 | $5.5 | up 2% | $4.9 | $4.7 | up 5% | ||||||
Operating Margin | (15.3)% | (7.8)% | down 7.5 ppts | 0.2% | 3.5% | down 3.3 ppts | ||||||
Tax Rate | 17.5% | 280.5% | n/m** | 13.0% | 13.0% | — | ||||||
Net Income (loss) Attributable to Intel ($B) | $(1.6) | $1.5 | n/m** | $0.1 | $0.5 | down 85% | ||||||
Earnings (loss) Per Share Attributable to Intel | $(0.38) | $0.35 | n/m** | $0.02 | $0.13 | down 85% |
In the second quarter, the company generated $2.3 billion in cash from operations and paid dividends of $0.5 billion.
| |
|
Business Unit Summary
Intel previously announced the implementation of an internal foundry operating model, which took effect in the first quarter of 2024 and created a foundry relationship between its Intel Products business (collectively CCG, DCAI and NEX) and its Intel Foundry business (including Foundry Technology Development, Foundry Manufacturing and Supply Chain, and Foundry Services (formerly IFS)). The foundry operating model is a key component of the company's strategy and is designed to reshape operational dynamics and drive greater transparency, accountability, and focus on costs and efficiency. The company also previously announced its intent to operate Altera ® as a standalone business beginning in the first quarter of 2024. Altera was previously included in DCAI's segment results. As a result of these changes, the company modified its segment reporting in the first quarter of 2024 to align to this new operating model. All prior-period segment data has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the way the company internally receives information and manages and monitors its operating segment performance starting in fiscal year 2024. There are no changes to Intel’s consolidated financial statements for any prior periods.
|
|
| ||
Intel Products: |
|
| ||
Client Computing Group (CCG) | $7.4 billion | up 9% | ||
Data Center and AI (DCAI) | $3.0 billion | down 3% | ||
Network and Edge (NEX) | $1.3 billion | down 1% | ||
Total Intel Products revenue | $11.8 billion | up 4% | ||
Intel Foundry | $4.3 billion | up 4% | ||
All other: |
|
| ||
Altera | $361 million | down 57% | ||
Mobileye | $440 million | down 3% | ||
Other | $167 million | up 43% | ||
Total all other revenue | $968 million | down 32% | ||
Intersegment eliminations | $(4.3) billion |
| ||
Total net revenue | $12.8 billion | down 1% |
Intel Products Highlights
Intel Foundry Highlights
Other Highlights
Intel announced its second Semiconductor Co-Investment Program (SCIP) agreement, the formation of a joint venture with Apollo related to Intel’s Fab 34 in Ireland. SCIP is an element of Intel’s Smart Capital strategy, a funding approach designed to create financial flexibility to accelerate the company’s strategy, including investing in its global manufacturing operations, while maintaining a strong balance sheet.
Q3 2024 Dividend
The company announced that its board of directors has declared a quarterly dividend of $0.125 per share on the company’s common stock, which will be payable Sept. 1, 2024, to shareholders of record as of Aug. 7, 2024.
As noted earlier, Intel is suspending the dividend starting in the fourth quarter.
Business Outlook
Intel's guidance for the third quarter of 2024 includes both GAAP and non-GAAP estimates as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
| $12.5-13.5 billion |
|
|
Gross Margin |
| 34.5% |
| 38.0% |
Tax Rate |
| 34% |
| 13% |
Earnings (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Intel—Diluted |
| $(0.24) |
| $(0.03) |
Reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures are included below. Actual results may differ materially from Intel’s business outlook as a result of, among other things, the factors described under “Forward-Looking Statements” below. The gross margin and EPS outlook are based on the mid-point of the revenue range.
Earnings Webcast
Intel will hold a public webcast at 2 p.m. PDT today to discuss the results for its second quarter of 2024. The live public webcast can be accessed on Intel's Investor Relations website at www.intc.com . The corresponding earnings presentation and webcast replay will also be available on the site.
Forward-Looking Statements
This release contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Words such as "accelerate", "achieve", "aim", "ambitions", "anticipate", "believe", "committed", "continue", "could", "designed", "estimate", "expect", "forecast", "future", "goals", "grow", "guidance", "intend", "likely", "may", "might", "milestones", "next generation", "objective", "on track", "opportunity", "outlook", "pending", "plan", "position", "possible", "potential", "predict", "progress", "ramp", "roadmap", "seek", "should", "strive", "targets", "to be", "upcoming", "will", "would", and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, which may include statements regarding:
Such statements involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied, including those associated with:
Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in this release and in other documents we file from time to time with the SEC that disclose risks and uncertainties that may affect our business.
Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the forward-looking statements in this release do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures, mergers, acquisitions, or other business combinations that have not been completed as of the date of this filing. In addition, the forward-looking statements in this release are based on management's expectations as of the date of this release, unless an earlier date is specified, including expectations based on third-party information and projections that management believes to be reputable. We do not undertake, and expressly disclaim any duty, to update such statements, whether as a result of new information, new developments, or otherwise, except to the extent that disclosure may be required by law.
About Intel
Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) is an industry leader, creating world-changing technology that enables global progress and enriches lives. Inspired by Moore’s Law, we continuously work to advance the design and manufacturing of semiconductors to help address our customers’ greatest challenges. By embedding intelligence in the cloud, network, edge and every kind of computing device, we unleash the potential of data to transform business and society for the better. To learn more about Intel’s innovations, go to newsroom.intel.com and intel.com.
© Intel Corporation. Intel, the Intel logo, and other Intel marks are trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Intel Corporation | ||||||||
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income and Other Information | ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
| 8,286 |
|
|
| 8,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
| 4,239 |
|
|
| 4,080 |
|
Marketing, general, and administrative |
|
| 1,329 |
|
|
| 1,374 |
|
Restructuring and other charges |
|
| 943 |
|
|
| 200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on equity investments, net |
|
| (120 | ) |
|
| (24 | ) |
Interest and other, net |
|
| 80 |
|
|
| 224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) taxes |
|
| (350 | ) |
|
| (2,289 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
| (44 | ) |
|
| (8 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding: |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of employee equity incentive plans |
|
| — |
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
Employees |
|
|
| |||
Intel | 116.5 | 116.4 | 118.1 | |||
Mobileye and other subsidiaries | 5.3 | 5.2 | 4.7 | |||
NAND | 3.5 | 3.6 | 4.0 | |||
Total Intel |
|
|
|
Employees of the NAND memory business, which we divested to SK hynix on completion of the first closing on December 29, 2021 and fully deconsolidated in Q1 2022. Upon completion of the second closing of the divestiture, which remains pending and subject to closing conditions, the NAND employees will be excluded from the total Intel employee number. |
Intel Corporation | ||||||||
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 11,287 |
|
| $ | 7,079 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
| 17,986 |
|
|
| 17,955 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
| 3,131 |
|
|
| 3,402 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
| ||||
Raw materials |
|
| 1,284 |
|
|
| 1,166 |
|
Work in process |
|
| 6,294 |
|
|
| 6,203 |
|
Finished goods |
|
| 3,666 |
|
|
| 3,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
| 7,181 |
|
|
| 3,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
| ||||
Short-term debt |
| $ | 4,695 |
|
| $ | 2,288 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
| 9,618 |
|
|
| 8,578 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
| 2,651 |
|
|
| 3,655 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
| 1,856 |
|
|
| 1,107 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
| 13,207 |
|
|
| 12,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
| ||||
Common stock and capital in excess of par value, 4,276 issued and outstanding (4,228 issued and outstanding as of December 30, 2023) |
|
| 49,763 |
|
|
| 36,649 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
| (696 | ) |
|
| (215 | ) |
Retained earnings |
|
| 66,162 |
|
|
| 69,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Corporation | ||||||||
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows | ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities: |
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income (loss) |
|
| (2,091 | ) |
|
| (1,295 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
| ||||
Depreciation |
|
| 4,403 |
|
|
| 3,733 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
| 1,959 |
|
|
| 1,661 |
|
Restructuring and other charges |
|
| 1,291 |
|
|
| 255 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
| 717 |
|
|
| 909 |
|
(Gains) losses on equity investments, net |
|
| (84 | ) |
|
| (146 | ) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
| ||||
Accounts receivable |
|
| 272 |
|
|
| 1,137 |
|
Inventories |
|
| (116 | ) |
|
| 1,240 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
| 184 |
|
|
| (1,102 | ) |
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
| (1,309 | ) |
|
| (1,340 | ) |
Income taxes |
|
| (2,174 | ) |
|
| (2,186 | ) |
Other assets and liabilities |
|
| (1,983 | ) |
|
| (1,843 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used for) investing activities: |
|
|
|
| ||||
Additions to property, plant, and equipment |
|
| (11,652 | ) |
|
| (13,301 | ) |
Proceeds from capital-related government incentives |
|
| 699 |
|
|
| 49 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
| (17,634 | ) |
|
| (25,696 | ) |
Maturities and sales of short-term investments |
|
| 17,214 |
|
|
| 26,957 |
|
Other investing |
|
| (355 | ) |
|
| 662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used for) financing activities: |
|
|
|
| ||||
Issuance of commercial paper, net of issuance costs |
|
| 5,804 |
|
|
| — |
|
Repayment of commercial paper |
|
| (2,609 | ) |
|
| (3,944 | ) |
Payments on finance leases |
|
| — |
|
|
| (96 | ) |
Partner contributions |
|
| 11,861 |
|
|
| 834 |
|
Proceeds from sales of subsidiary shares |
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,573 |
|
Issuance of long-term debt, net of issuance costs |
|
| 2,975 |
|
|
| 10,968 |
|
Repayment of debt |
|
| (2,288 | ) |
|
| — |
|
Proceeds from sales of common stock through employee equity incentive plans |
|
| 631 |
|
|
| 665 |
|
Payment of dividends to stockholders |
|
| (1,063 | ) |
|
| (2,036 | ) |
Other financing |
|
| (444 | ) |
|
| (453 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Corporation | ||||||||
Supplemental Operating Segment Results | ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Desktop |
| $ | 2,527 |
|
| $ | 2,370 |
|
Notebook |
|
| 4,480 |
|
|
| 3,896 |
|
Other |
|
| 403 |
|
|
| 514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Altera |
|
| 361 |
|
|
| 848 |
|
Mobileye |
|
| 440 |
|
|
| 454 |
|
Other |
|
| 167 |
|
|
| 117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment eliminations |
|
| (4,254 | ) |
|
| (3,941 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Altera |
|
| (25 | ) |
|
| 346 |
|
Mobileye |
|
| 72 |
|
|
| 129 |
|
Other |
|
| (82 | ) |
|
| (120 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment eliminations |
|
| (291 | ) |
|
| (413 | ) |
Corporate unallocated expenses |
|
| (1,720 | ) |
|
| (1,608 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For information about our operating segments, including the nature of segment revenues and expenses, and a reconciliation of our operating segment revenue and operating income (loss) to our consolidated results, refer to our Form 10-K filed on January 26, 2024, Form 8-K furnished on April 2, 2024 and 10-Q filed on August 1, 2024.
Intel Corporation Explanation of Non-GAAP Measures
In addition to disclosing financial results in accordance with US GAAP, this document contains references to the non-GAAP financial measures below. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide investors with useful supplemental information about our operating performance, enable comparison of financial trends and results between periods where certain items may vary independent of business performance, and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in operating our business and measuring our performance. Some of these non-GAAP financial measures are used in our performance-based RSUs and our cash bonus plans.
Our non-GAAP financial measures reflect adjustments based on one or more of the following items, as well as the related income tax effects. Income tax effects are calculated using a fixed long-term projected tax rate of 13% across all adjustments. We project this long-term non-GAAP tax rate on at least an annual basis using a five-year non-GAAP financial projection that excludes the income tax effects of each adjustment. The projected non-GAAP tax rate also considers factors such as our tax structure, our tax positions in various jurisdictions, and key legislation in significant jurisdictions where we operate. This long-term non-GAAP tax rate may be subject to change for a variety of reasons, including the rapidly evolving global tax environment, significant changes in our geographic earnings mix, or changes to our strategy or business operations. Management uses this non-GAAP tax rate in managing internal short- and long-term operating plans and in evaluating our performance; we believe this approach facilitates comparison of our operating results and provides useful evaluation of our current operating performance.
Our non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with US GAAP, and the financial results calculated in accordance with US GAAP and reconciliations from these results should be carefully evaluated.
|
|
|
Acquisition-related adjustments | Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets consists of amortization of intangible assets such as developed technology, brands, and customer relationships acquired in connection with business combinations. Charges related to the amortization of these intangibles are recorded within both cost of sales and MG&A in our US GAAP financial statements. Amortization charges are recorded over the estimated useful life of the related acquired intangible asset, and thus are generally recorded over multiple years.
| We exclude amortization charges for our acquisition-related intangible assets for purposes of calculating certain non-GAAP measures because these charges are inconsistent in size and are significantly impacted by the timing and valuation of our acquisitions. These adjustments facilitate a useful evaluation of our current operating performance and comparison to our past operating performance and provide investors with additional means to evaluate cost and expense trends.
|
Share-based compensation | Share-based compensation consists of charges related to our employee equity incentive plans. | We exclude charges related to share-based compensation for purposes of calculating certain non-GAAP measures because we believe these adjustments provide comparability to peer company results and because these charges are not viewed by management as part of our core operating performance. We believe these adjustments provide investors with a useful view, through the eyes of management, of our core business model, how management currently evaluates core operational performance, and additional means to evaluate expense trends, including in comparison to other peer companies.
|
Restructuring and other charges | Restructuring charges are costs associated with a restructuring plan and are primarily related to employee severance and benefit arrangements. Other charges include periodic goodwill and asset impairments, and costs associated with restructuring activity. Q2 2024 includes a charge arising out of the R2 litigation. | We exclude restructuring and other charges, including any adjustments to charges recorded in prior periods, for purposes of calculating certain non-GAAP measures because these costs do not reflect our core operating performance. These adjustments facilitate a useful evaluation of our core operating performance and comparisons to past operating results and provide investors with additional means to evaluate expense trends.
|
(Gains) losses on equity investments, net | (Gains) losses on equity investments, net consists of ongoing mark-to-market adjustments on marketable equity securities, observable price adjustments on non-marketable equity securities, related impairment charges, and the sale of equity investments and other.
| We exclude these non-operating gains and losses for purposes of calculating certain non-GAAP measures because it provides comparability between periods. The exclusion reflects how management evaluates the core operations of the business.
|
(Gains) losses from divestiture | (Gains) losses are recognized at the close of a divestiture, or over a specified deferral period when deferred consideration is received at the time of closing. Based on our ongoing obligation under the NAND wafer manufacturing and sale agreement entered into in connection with the first closing of the sale of our NAND memory business on December 29, 2021, a portion of the initial closing consideration was deferred and will be recognized between first and second closing.
| We exclude gains or losses resulting from divestitures for purposes of calculating certain non-GAAP measures because they do not reflect our current operating performance. These adjustments facilitate a useful evaluation of our current operating performance and comparisons to past operating results. |
Adjusted free cash flow | We reference a non-GAAP financial measure of adjusted free cash flow, which is used by management when assessing our sources of liquidity, capital resources, and quality of earnings. Adjusted free cash flow is operating cash flow adjusted for (1) additions to property, plant, and equipment, net of proceeds from capital-related government incentives and partner contributions, and (2) payments on finance leases.
| This non-GAAP financial measure is helpful in understanding our capital requirements and sources of liquidity by providing an additional means to evaluate the cash flow trends of our business. |
Net capital spending | We reference a non-GAAP financial measure of net capital spending, which is additions to property, plant, and equipment, net of proceeds from capital-related government incentives and partner contributions. | We believe this measure provides investors with useful supplemental information about our capital investment activities and capital offsets, and allows for greater transparency with respect to a key metric used by management in operating our business and measuring our performance.
|
Intel Corporation Supplemental Reconciliations of GAAP Actuals to Non-GAAP Actuals
Set forth below are reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable US GAAP financial measure. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with US GAAP, and the reconciliations from US GAAP to Non-GAAP actuals should be carefully evaluated. Please refer to "Explanation of Non-GAAP Measures" in this document for a detailed explanation of the adjustments made to the comparable US GAAP measures, the ways management uses the non-GAAP measures, and the reasons why management believes the non-GAAP measures provide useful information for investors.
|
| |||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisition-related adjustments |
| 224 |
|
| 306 |
| ||
Share-based compensation |
| 195 |
|
| 210 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisition-related adjustments |
| 1.7 | % |
| 2.4 | % | ||
Share-based compensation |
| 1.5 | % |
| 1.6 | % | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisition-related adjustments |
| (41 | ) |
| (44 | ) | ||
Share-based compensation |
| (585 | ) |
| (712 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisition-related adjustments |
| 265 |
|
| 350 |
| ||
Share-based compensation |
| 780 |
|
| 922 |
| ||
Restructuring and other charges |
| 943 |
|
| 200 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisition-related adjustments |
| 2.1 | % |
| 2.7 | % | ||
Share-based compensation |
| 6.1 | % |
| 7.1 | % | ||
Restructuring and other charges |
| 7.3 | % |
| 1.5 | % | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income tax effects |
| (4.5 | )% |
| (267.5 | )% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisition-related adjustments |
| 265 |
|
| 350 |
| ||
Share-based compensation |
| 780 |
|
| 922 |
| ||
Restructuring and other charges |
| 943 |
|
| 200 |
| ||
(Gains) losses on equity investments, net |
| 120 |
|
| 24 |
| ||
(Gains) losses from divestiture |
| (39 | ) |
| (39 | ) | ||
Adjustments attributable to non-controlling interest |
| (18 | ) |
| (18 | ) | ||
Income tax effects |
| (358 | ) |
| (2,373 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisition-related adjustments |
| 0.06 |
|
| 0.08 |
| ||
Share-based compensation |
| 0.18 |
|
| 0.22 |
| ||
Restructuring and other charges |
| 0.22 |
|
| 0.05 |
| ||
(Gains) losses on equity investments, net |
| 0.03 |
|
| 0.01 |
| ||
(Gains) losses from divestiture |
| (0.01 | ) |
| (0.01 | ) | ||
Adjustments attributable to non-controlling interest |
| — |
|
| — |
| ||
Income tax effects |
| (0.08 | ) |
| (0.57 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net partner contributions and incentives received (cash expended) for property plant and equipment |
| 5,863 |
|
| (5,454 | ) | ||
Payments on finance leases |
| — |
|
| (81 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Intel Corporation Supplemental Reconciliations of GAAP Outlook to Non-GAAP Outlook
Set forth below are reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable US GAAP financial measure. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with US GAAP, and the financial outlook prepared in accordance with US GAAP and the reconciliations from this Business Outlook should be carefully evaluated. Please refer to "Explanation of Non-GAAP Measures" in this document for a detailed explanation of the adjustments made to the comparable US GAAP measures, the ways management uses the non-GAAP measures, and the reasons why management believes the non-GAAP measures provide useful information for investors.
|
| |||
| Approximately | |||
|
|
|
| |
Acquisition-related adjustments |
| 1.7 | % | |
Share-based compensation |
| 1.8 | % | |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
Income tax effects |
| (21 | )% | |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
Acquisition-related adjustments |
| 0.06 |
| |
Share-based compensation |
| 0.23 |
| |
Restructuring and other charges |
| 0.06 |
| |
(Gains) losses from divestiture |
| (0.01 | ) | |
Adjustments attributable to non-controlling interest |
| — |
| |
Income tax effects |
| (0.13 | ) | |
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP gross margin percentage and non-GAAP EPS outlook based on the mid-point of the revenue range. |
Intel Corporation Supplemental Reconciliations of Other GAAP to Non-GAAP Forward-Looking Estimates
Set forth below are reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable US GAAP financial measure. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with US GAAP, and the reconciliations should be carefully evaluated. Please refer to "Explanation of Non-GAAP Measures" in this document for a detailed explanation of the adjustments made to the comparable US GAAP measures, the ways management uses the non-GAAP measures, and the reasons why management believes the non-GAAP measures provide useful information for investors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Approximately |
| Approximately |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition-related adjustments |
| (0.2) |
| (0.1) |
Share-based compensation |
| (2.7) |
| (2.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from capital-related government incentives |
| (1.5 - 3.5) |
| (4.0 - 6.0) |
Partner contributions |
| (12.5) |
| (4.0 - 5.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240801042170/en/
Kylie Altman Investor Relations 1-916-356-0320 [email protected] Penny Bruce Media Relations 1-408-893-0601 [email protected]
Source: Intel Corporation
Released Aug 1, 2024 • 4:01 PM EDT
A new law that could force homeowners across California to cover billions of dollars of insurer losses caused by a catastrophic wildfire is generating pushback from a leading consumer group, which has called it an industry “bailout.”
State Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara announced Friday he had reached an agreement with the California FAIR Plan that would allow losses suffered by the state’s insurer of last resort to be recouped by surcharges on residential and commercial insurance policies statewide in an “extreme worst case scenario.”
The FAIR Plan, which insures property owners who cannot get or afford traditional policies, is backed by licensed insurers such as State Farm and Allstate. As the program is structured, they are on the hook to pay claims if the FAIR Plan runs through its reserves, reinsurance and catastrophe bonds.
Major insurers have pulled back from California’s homeowners market, citing wildfires, inflation and other challenges. But there are steps at-risk homeowners can take now to secure coverage and at lower prices.
March 29, 2024
Under Lara’s agreement, if that happens the insurers would be required to cover up to $2 billion in FAIR Plan claims — $1 billion for residential and $1 billion for commercial claims. They could then temporarily surcharge their own policyholders for half of what they are assessed with the approval of the insurance commissioner.
Homeowners would not be surcharged for commercial losses — only holders of commercial policies would be. The agreement also allows insurers to temporarily surcharge policyholders for 100% of claims in excess of those amounts with the approval of the insurance commissioner.
“It’s outrageous and outside the law for the insurance commissioner to force consumers to bail out home insurance companies and then call that consumer protection,” said Carmen Balber, executive director of Los Angeles-based Consumer Watchdog .
Gabriel Sanchez, Lara’s press secretary, defended the agreement, saying, “It would be easy to listen to the elites and the entrenched interests defending a system that clearly isn’t working. Commissioner Lara is focused on hearing from the public, following the data and creating realistic, long-lasting solutions for everyone in this state.”
The FAIR Plan assessment is the latest element of Lara’s Sustainable Insurance Strategy, a package of executive actions intended to stabilize the California market, which has seen insurers stop writing new policies and decline to renew existing policies amid a sharp increase in claims for wildfires damage.
Just this week, firefighters are battling the massive Park fire in Butte, Tehama and Shasta counties, where 100 structures have been destroyed, 4,200 were threatened and 26,000 people were forced to evacuate as of Monday. It is the sixth-largest fire in state history.
The insurance industry will soon have the ability to use wildfire models when setting rates. Homeowners in high risk areas already know how these models have made policies hard to get and hard to afford.
July 26, 2024
As insurers have pulled back from high-fire risk neighborhoods, the number of residential FAIR Plan policies has more than doubled since 2019 to about 408,000 as of June. Commercial policies similarly increased to 11,026.
The FAIR Plan has a market share under 4%. Policyholders are concentrated in canyons, hillsides and other high-risk neighborhoods, vulnerable to fire and catastrophic insurance losses. The plan’s loss exposure was $393 billion as of June, even though the plan’s policies are more limited than those available through the regular commercial market.
Lara said Friday in a release announcing the agreement that “modernizing the FAIR Plan is a crucial step in our strategy to stabilize California’s insurance market.”
The FAIR Plan’s financial risk is overwhelmingly due to its residential policies, which account for about 95% of its $393 billion in total loss exposure, according to the insurer.
The Insurance Department downplayed a worst-case scenario, noting that even the 2018 Camp fire in Butte County that ravaged the town of Paradise, destroying or damaging more than 19,000 structures and causing some $16.5 billion in damage , did not deplete the FAIR Plan’s reserves.
The Insurance Department contended that the agreement was actually favorable to consumers because under current law there is nothing prohibiting the insurers from seeking policyholder assessments on all FAIR Plan losses they must cover.
“The agreement ... requires insurance companies to share the burden, something not clearly outlined before. That protects consumers by providing predictability which leads to stability,” Sanchez said.
Balber disputed that reading of the law and said Lara has not been able to get legislative authority for the insurer policyholder assessments, so he proceeded under questionable executive authority. “We have several questions about the legality of this proposal and are looking into it,” she said.
Consumer Watchdog has called for requiring insurers to offer policies in wildfire-prone neighborhoods to homeowners who have taken steps to reduce fire risks on their property as the best method to reduce enrollment in the FAIR Plan and stabilize the state’s insurance market.
Another key element of Lara’s FAIR Plan reforms call for the insurer to offer greater commercial coverage — up to $20 million per structure and $100 million for any one location.
Dan Dunmoyer, chief executive of the California Building Industry Assn., said the trade group has been seeking higher commercial coverage limits due to the rise of insurance premiums, which have slowed the construction of condominium complexes that builders insure.
He estimated that astronomical insurance rate increases have slowed condo construction by about 70% in the last 12 months, with fewer than 6,000 units built.
“Our view on this is: Get some competition in the marketplace, expand commercial coverage, let us build the most affordable for sale homes in California, which are condos,” he said.
The American Property Casualty Insurance Assn., an industry trade group, called Lara’s plan “an important step toward restoring the FAIR Plan’s financial stability and ensuring consumers have access to the coverage they need.”
The deal reached by Lara with the FAIR Plan is a binding legal stipulation and it requires the insurer to develop a “Plan of Operation” within 30 days detailing how it will carry out the agreement. It has 120 days to submit a rate plan for offering the higher commercial coverage.
The FAIR Plan was sued last week by four California residents who claim its policies offer subpar coverage for fire and smoke damage. The proposed class-action lawsuit seeks to represent more than 300,000 of the plan’s residential policyholders. The plan also is facing a lawsuit from more than 1,000 homeowners in Los Angeles who say the plan wrongly denied their claims.
July 11, 2024
June 28, 2024
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
Laurence Darmiento covers finance, insurance, aerospace and dealmakers in Southern California for the Los Angeles Times. He joined the paper in 2015 as an assistant business editor and has overseen finance, real estate and Washington business coverage. Previously he had been the managing editor of the Los Angeles Business Journal and was a reporter for the Los Angeles Daily News and other outlets. A New York native, he is an alumnus of Cornell University.
Entertainment & Arts
Advertisement
Supported by
The Silicon Valley chip maker also reported a net loss and declining revenue in the latest quarter.
By Don Clark
Reporting from San Francisco
Intel, the Silicon Valley chip maker, said on Thursday that it would slash more than 15,000 jobs to aid a turnaround plan, as the company tries to recover after a series of stumbles.
The job cuts amount to 15 percent of Intel’s work force . The company also announced other restructuring moves and a reduction in capital spending, which are expected to cut costs by $10 billion in 2025. To conserve cash, Intel said, it will suspend its quarterly dividend in the fourth quarter.
“This is painful news for me to share,” Patrick Gelsinger , Intel’s chief executive, said in a letter to employees. “I know it will be even more difficult for you to read. This is an incredibly hard day for Intel as we are making some of the most consequential changes in our company’s history.”
The company’s stock fell more than 20 percent in after-hours trading.
Intel, which produces microprocessor chips that serve as electronic brains in most computers, has battled a slump amid stiff competition in chips used for artificial intelligence. Its last major restructuring was in 2016, when the company said it would cut up to 12,000 jobs, or 11 percent of its work force.
Mr. Gelsinger has worked to reinvigorate the company after being named its top leader in early 2021. Among other actions, he quickly moved to become a top industry lobbyist for federal subsidies to encourage more U.S. production of the foundational components.
He has also tried to fix Intel’s manufacturing issues. Unlike most of its peers, Intel makes chips as well as designs them. Others rely on outside production services called foundries, with most turning to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
Postcolonial futures for disaster risk reduction in south asia - southasiadisasters.net issue no. 211, june 2024, attachments.
INTRODUCTION
This issue of Southasiadisasters.net is titled ‘Postcolonial Futures for Disaster Risk Reduction in South Asia’ offers pathways towards rethinking disaster risk and enhancing people’s everyday lives and livelihoods, moving away and ahead from mostly Western concepts, frameworks, methodologies, and tools to more plural local pathways. Read 17 vibrant contributors-provoking perspectives to help you find your way to disaster risk reduction and preparedness for the future.
IN THIS ISSUE
Heatwave deaths are avoidable - southasiadisasters.net issue no. 210, may 2024, unicef india, west bengal situation report no. 2 (cyclone remal): 30 may 2024, unicef india west bengal situation report no. 1 (cyclone remal) 27 may 2024, india annual country report 2023 - country strategic plan 2023 - 2027.
To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot.
Please make sure your browser supports JavaScript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. For more information you can review our Terms of Service and Cookie Policy .
For inquiries related to this message please contact our support team and provide the reference ID below.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Risk reduction refers to different processes, controls, and measures in place that are designed to reduce the risk that organizations and workers face on a regular basis. The process involves identifying and assessing risks while also implementing various measures and processes aimed to reduce them. Companies regularly perform risk reduction to ...
Risk reduction involves implementing proactive and concrete actions to make a potential problem less severe. ... Update risk and adapt your plan. As your business landscape evolves—whether due to market shifts, technological upgrades, or internal developments—your risk mitigation plan must keep pace. Not only can new risks arise, but the ...
1. Prepare supporting documentation. You'll want to review existing project management documentation to help you craft your risk management plan. This documentation includes: Project Charter: among other things, this document establishes the project objectives, the project sponsor, and you as the project manager.
Step 1: Develop a solid risk culture. An essential component of any successful risk management plan is the establishment of strong risk culture. Risk culture is commonly known as the shared values, beliefs, and attitudes toward the handling of risks throughout the organization. It is the responsibility of senior management and the board of ...
Step 2: Perform a risk assessment. The next step is to quantify the level of risk for each risk identified during the first step. This is a key part of the risk mitigation plan since this step lays the groundwork for the entire plan. In the assessment phase you will measure each risk against one another and analyze the occurrence of each risk.
The first step in developing a risk mitigation plan is identifying the risks. During this phase, the team needs to identify and name all potential risks that the organization faces. This may include risks to crucial data, employee safety, and processes. However, it should also consider the unique risks that the business may face due to the ...
Risk mitigation is the process of eliminating or lessening the impact of those risks. Teams can use risk mitigation in several ways to help protect a business. Project leaders might use project risk management and mitigation to ensure the success of a specific project. Business leaders might use business risk mitigation — sometimes as part of ...
Risk mitigation is the process of reducing potential threats or risks posed to a business or project. Part of a larger risk management strategy, risk mitigation involves identifying risks and developing a plan to manage or eliminate them—so you can feel confident moving forward, no matter what the ask or the task.
A risk management plan enables project managers to see ahead to potential risks and reduce their negative impact. A new project welcomes in new opportunities but also potential risks so a risk management plan is a must for risk project managers. In order to effectively manage the project and lead their project team to a successful outcome, they ...
Evaluate and assess the consequence, impact, and probability of each potential risk. 3. Assign roles and responsibilities to each risk. 4. Come up with preventative strategies for each risk. 5. Create a contingency plan in case things go really wrong. 6. Measure your risk threshold and work with project stakeholders.
On monday.com, you can get as detailed as necessary, and add risk owners, dates, and statuses for a fully actionable plan: 4. Monitor risks regularly. Businesses aren't static and projects frequently change. It's essential to regularly monitor each risk to check its category and mitigation strategy.
While adopting a risk management plan from another business may be tempting, your plan should be tailored to your specific business strategy." ... Reduction. Reduction focuses on minimizing the likelihood of a risk happening or reducing its impact if it does occur. This strategy involves implementing processes, technologies, or training that ...
4 Reasons Why Risk Management Is Important. 1. Protects Organization's Reputation. In many cases, effective risk management proactively protects your organization from incidents that can affect its reputation. "Franchise risk is a concern for all businesses," Simons says in Strategy Execution. "However, it's especially pressing for ...
A risk management plan usually includes: Methodology: Define the tools and approaches that will be used to perform risk management activities such as risk assessment, risk analysis and risk mitigation strategies. Risk Register: A risk register is a chart to document the risk identification information. Risk Breakdown Structure: This is a chart that identifies risk categories and the ...
Managing Risks: A New Framework. Smart companies match their approach to the nature of the threats they face. Summary. Risk management is too often treated as a compliance issue that can be solved ...
Risk mitigation is one of the key steps in the risk management process. It refers to the strategy of planning and developing options to reduce threats to project objectives often faced by a business or organization. Risk mitigation is a culmination of the techniques and strategies that are used to minimize risk levels and pare them down to ...
Cyber risk is a form of business risk. More specifically, it's the potential for business losses of all kinds in the digital domain—financial, reputational, operational, productivity related, and regulatory related. While cyber risk originates from threats in the digital realm, it can also cause losses in the physical world, such as damage ...
An organization's ERM program aims to manage risks and mitigate their potential harm. To achieve this goal, the business can employ several risk strategies, also known as risk responses. Two common responses are risk avoidance and risk reduction. Other strategies are risk acceptance and risk transfer. How do risk avoidance and risk reduction ...
Download the Blank Project Risk Management Plan for Microsoft Word. Use this blank template to create your own project risk management plan. The template includes sections to ensure that your team covers all areas of risk management, such as risk identification, risk assessment, and risk mitigation.
Risk reduction in finance refers to the scaling down of negative effects or possibilities that arise out of losses. ... Businesses need to plan for contingencies in order to be ready for ... (Control event rate). It is the relative reduction in an entity's overall business risks caused by unfavorable circumstances. Recommended Articles. This ...
Risk Mitigation Plan Template. Eliminate paperwork with digital checklists. Generate reports from completed checklists. Free to use for up to 10 users. Start using template View template in library. You can use this template for planning mitigation actions to reduce or eliminate risks in your workplace. It allows you to define potential risks ...
Risk control is the method by which firms evaluate potential losses and take action to reduce or eliminate such threats. It is a technique that utilizes findings from risk assessments , which ...
6. Weather Risk. A solar power company reduces weather risk by scheduling critical construction tasks during the months with the best weather in a particular region. 7. Financial Risk. An infrastructure company reduces interest rate risk and refinancing risk by selling long term bonds when rates are low. 8.
Cost-Reduction Plan. As Intel nears the completion of rebuilding a sustainable engine of process technology leadership, it announced a series of initiatives to create a sustainable financial engine that accelerates profitable growth, enables further operational efficiency and agility, and creates capacity for ongoing strategic investment in ...
As insurers have pulled back from high-fire risk neighborhoods, the number of residential FAIR Plan policies has more than doubled since 2019 to about 408,000 as of June. Commercial policies ...
Intel late Thursday badly missed Wall Street's targets for the second quarter and with its guidance for the third quarter.The chip giant also announced a $10 billion cost-reduction plan and ...
Intel is slashing 15% of its staff as part of a $10 billion plan to reduce costs, the tech company announced in its second-quarter earnings Thursday. "Simply put, we must align our cost ...
In contrast, AMD on Tuesday reported a 115 percent jump for its data center business. Overall, Intel swung to a loss of $1.6 billion in the second quarter, while revenue fell 1 percent to $12.8 ...
Postcolonial Futures for Disaster Risk Reduction in South Asia - Southasiadisasters.net Issue No. 211, June 2024 ... Country Strategic Plan 2023 - 2027 Format Other Source. WFP; Posted 2 Apr 2024
All three of the top US bank regulators need to get on the same page when they propose major revisions to the Biden administration's signature overhaul of capital requirements — or risk ...