The State was a Hindu policeman in Manmohan Desai’s Amar Akbar Anthony (1977), one of modern India’s most popular films on religious harmony. The Christian and the Muslim characters, played by Amitabh Bachchan and Rishi Kapoor , respectively, were marked by their religious symbols, while the Hindu man, portrayed by Vinod Khanna, dressed in neutral clothes, possessed the reins to control the society – a pattern that aligned with Hindu majoritarianism.
In Puzhu , directed by debutante Ratheena PT and written by Harshad , the upper-caste Hindu is a policeman, an IPS officer, with the power to create or destroy lives and manufacture narratives that would eventually creep into history textbooks. But unlike Desai’s film, Puzhu is steeped in reality and a fine sense of justice. The film, which aspires to be a slow-burner, takes the viewer through the seemingly perfect life of the man, played majestically by Mammootty , and reveals its dark interiors. A widower, he keeps his son Kichu (Vasudev Marar), an early teenager, a prisoner at home, barring him from playing with his friends or mingling with people who aren’t his family members. Every evening, he makes him sit with him on their living room couch and watch an old home video featuring the late mother, to remind the child of what he lost. He threatens the child and emotionally manipulates him to keep him close as he fears he would lose Kichu to the outsiders, like how he had ‘lost’ his younger sister Bharathi ( Parvathy TK ) when she fell in love with a Dalit playwright-actor Kuttappan (Appunni Sasi).
For the most part, Puzhu invests itself in depicting the man’s paranoia. He does not trust the walls of his plush apartment guarded by a strong security system. He reaches for his pistol every time he senses danger – the sound of a door creaking or the sight of a fallen tree on the way home. Time and again, he barges into the shabby home of his former business rival (Kunchan), whom he had driven into deprivation, believing that he is still out there to harm him. Why does he, belonging as he does to the cream of Indian society, to the class that enjoys all the social powers and material wealth, believe that he is always under threat?
A straight line connects Puzhu to several celebrated superstar films in Malayalam, such as Ranjith Sankar ’s Varsham (2014) in which Mammootty played a wealthy businessman grieving the death of his teenage son. In one of the most intense scenes in the film, his former domestic help, a Tamil man, meets him and weeps, only to be slapped across the face by the master. What is odd about the scene is not the act of violence by the wealthy man but the passivity of the film that coldly moves past the poor victim. In Puzhu , every slap is accounted for, dissected and studied.
Ratheena sets the frames in such a fashion that everything inside them makes one curious about the characters. The toys arranged next to Kichu’s bed, the colour of his pyjamas (Sameera Saneesh’s costume design is fantastic) or the living room furniture. The interior of Kichu’s apartment is modern and classy, but it exudes a strange sense of horror, a reflection of his father’s psyche. The greatest strength of Puzhu is not Mammootty but the atmosphere built by cinematographer Theni Easwar and musician Jakes Bejoy . Easwar’s moody lighting and the camera movements manifest the film’s tone. One might feel a chill down the spine when his camera, slowly, moves closer to the father and the son on the couch or when it observes the man being alone with his thoughts.
But this formal style could become meaningless in the absence of an equally sturdy screenplay. Instead of looking at the specifics of life, Harshad crams into the script several social issues – caste-based violence, toxic parenting, islamophobia and police violence – and turns the narrative into a cacophony of progressive political thoughts, muting the individual voices. Kuttappan, who possesses caste consciousness and courage, comes across only as a caricature, an embodiment of a social media page, devoid of human qualities like despair, fear or disgruntlement. In the latter half, the film throws away the opportunity to be a fascinating psychological drama on the paranoia of the powerful and becomes a summary of newspaper headlines.
In what must be its biggest misstep, Puzhu negates the cop’s paranoid schizophrenia, forcing the film to be a fable. At one point closer to the climactic end, he lashes out violently at Kichu, accusing him of partnering with his enemies. Now and then, he visits his bedridden, mute mother and like a little boy, unpacks his emotional baggage. Mammootty compensates for the natural limitations of his body using his brilliantly articulate voice and face. He brings to life the signs of the man’s mental aberrations and his intense hatred for what he regards as the ‘other’. The film’s utterly disappointing final sequence betrays this glorious performance. Ratheena and Harshad choose to make slogans out of broad strokes, abandoning the fascinating complexities of private life. Call it the curse of the woke era in Malayalam cinema.
This Puzhu review is a Silverscreen original article. It was not paid for or commissioned by anyone associated with the movie. Silverscreen.in and its writers do not have any commercial relationship with movies that are reviewed on the site.
NewsApp (Free)
Mammootty plays the despicable Kuttan with absolute integrity, observes Divya Nair.
If you have read the Mahabharata, you are probably aware of the story of King Parikshit and Takshaka, the serpent king.
Once, while hunting a deer in the forest, King Parikshit meets a hermit who is deep in meditation.
When he asks the hermit about the deer he was hunting, the latter doesn't respond. The angry king throws a dead snake around the hermit's neck.
On hearing about this act of sacrilege, the hermit's son gets upset and curses Parikshit that, within seven days, he would die of a snake bite. Takshaka, the serpent king, vows to kill Parikshit.
Parikshit fears for his life and builds a strong home to protect himself from the curse. He manages to cheat death several times. Ultimately, Takshaka turns into a puzhu ( worm ) and comes to Parikshit's table in a fruit basket. When Parikshit eats the fruit, it leads to his death.
Directed by Ratheena, Puzhu -- starring Mammootty and Parvathy -- is a modern adaption of this tale.
Kuttan (Mammootty) is a Brahmin police officer and widower who is extremely disciplined and protective about his only son, Kichu (Vasudev Sajeesh).
He disapproves of his sister Bharathi's (Parvathy) marriage to Kuttappan (Appunni Sasi), a scheduled caste theatre artiste who ultimately moves into the same residential society where Kuttan lives.
Through flashbacks, we learn of Mammootty's unpleasant past and possible enemies who he suspects are trying to kill him. However, most his investigations lead to dead ends, leaving him in a state of paranoia and disappointment.
Kuttan's temper and impulsive reactions to people and situations annoys his son to such an extent that he wishes to kill his father.
Just when Kichu distances himself from his father, Kuttan discovers that his sister is pregnant. He can't tolerate it and tries to negotiate with Bharathi who is adamant.
In Puzhu , Kuttan plays the arrogant King Parikshit who is cursed to be killed. Although he is aware that Takshaka is waiting for him and manages to escape death several times, the puzhu will find its way.
For her debut film, Ratheena's adaptationmtriumphs in many ways, but mostly for the portrayal of its lead character, Kuttan.
For someone like Kuttan who insists that the tomato is a vegetable and not a fruit and healthy teeth are always white, not yellow, change doesn't come easy, nor does acceptance of reality.
Kuttan will punish his only child and make him reiterate 'tomato is a vegetable' 500 times, but cannot accept that he could be wrong. But is Kuttan a bad father for teaching his son what he was taught by his father and by his teachers in school? How can discipline be such a bad thing?
Kuttan's disgust, lack of sensitivity and resistance to change finds reason in his brother-in-law Kuttappan's choice of theatrical subjects that question caste and patriarchy.
Mammootty plays the despicable Kuttan with absolute integrity. His effortlessly twitching face and body language do most of the talking. When he opens up to his bedridden mother, Kuttan comes clean about his flaws and misdoings, almost like he's the victim.
Meanwhile, Parvathy -- who has very little screen presence -- portrays the pain and emotions of a sister and wife quite well. The interactions between Kuttan and Bharathi, though minimal, are intense.
From an obedient son who wouldn't question his father for fear of being punished, Kichu's transformation to a rebel won't surprise you at all.
The beauty of this slow burn thriller lies in the subtle integration of each of its characters that draw you to their version of the subplot.
Unlike the Rohit V S-directed Kala , which was quite stylish and extrovert in its execution of hate and bigotry, or Jithin Issac Thomas's unsettling portrayal of the septic tank cleaner in Pra. Thoo. Mu (part of the Freedom Fight anthology) , Puzhu lets you view Kuttan's world of hate without actually spelling things out.
The dramatic use of theatre to fill in the missing pieces of the puzzle may not entice everyone because it still leaves a lot to your imagination.
While there are instances in which Puzhu makes you a little uncomfortable, it unfortunately doesn't let you empathise with any of its victims. This, I feel, is where I feel it largely fails.
Overall, while Puzhu is non-judgmental, it leaves you with just enough to ponder upon.
Puzhu streams on SonyLIV.
Beast review, saani kaayidham review.
Bollywood News | Current Bollywood News | Indian News | India Cricket Score | Business News India
Puzhu marks mammootty's digital debut., review: mammootty’s 'puzhu' deserves applause for taking on caste head on.
Ratheena PT’s directorial debut Puzhu is a deeply political film couched in many shades of grey. The film marks Mammootty’s digital debut and has the ageing superstar playing a complex character. Puzhu addresses both Dalit and Muslim politics, and themes such as ostracism and vengeance come alive on screen.
30 years after playing a very likeable Pappa to Appu in the blockbuster Pappayude Swantham Appoos (1992), Mammootty is back playing a single father again, this time in a totally opposite avatar. Mammootty’s Kuttan is a detestable figure right from the outset; a widower and a control freak engaged in constantly nagging and disciplining his pre-teen son Kichu.
In Puzhu Ratheena and the writers – the trio of Harshad, Sharfu and Suhas – take the narrative forward from Kuttan’s viewpoint, but do not balk from highlighting the prejudice and casteism of the protagonist, leaving the viewer to make their judgment. There is an element of tension throughout, and there is enough to keep the viewer hooked to the screen. However the audience is left to grope in the dark on the motives and reasons for the attempts on Kuttan’s life as the protagonist himself, with little detail on the character’s past.
For Mammootty Puzhu is a real departure from his routine of doing pointless films back-to-back, as if he were on short notice, broken only by the onset of Covid.
Post Munnariyippu (2014) Mammootty hasn’t really portrayed a character with grey shades, and the sheer fact that he went on to don this role is testament to his self-belief. The superstar explained away in a recent interview that he never flinched from taking up such roles and that he could only choose from what is offered to him.
Mammootty also dominates the proceedings on screen, with other characters including Parvathy Thiruvoth’s ‘Acchol’ flitting in and out of the frames. Appunni Sasi in a pivotal part as theatre actor Kuttappan makes an impact, his natural flair and Kozhikode accent making for a refreshing act. So does Vasudev Sajeesh Marar as young Kichu.
It must be noted here that Mammootty continues to be beset by the struggle to play the part of a younger man. Aging is a fact of life and there is only so much you can do to roll back the years. At some point you risk being inanimate, like a wax statue at Madam Tussauds, expressions becoming the casualty in the process. The only way to overcome that is to embrace age and the sooner Mammootty does that the better for him and the audience.
Puzhu might be politically correct and must be commended for that but it is only incidental for a film as a product. Essentially a film has to tick many more boxes and right intentions alone don’t suffice.
Puzhu does ask uncomfortable questions of viewers but one also gets the feeling that some of it is for the sake of it than for story-telling purposes, a result of the political leanings of its makers.
The team definitely deserves applause for taking caste head-on, especially in a deeply hypocritical society such as Kerala.
For all its imperfections, Puzhu is a commendable debut effort from Ratheena PT. As with many recent films in Malayalam, Puzhu ’s pitfalls probably emanate from too many cooks spoiling the broth, where scripting is a collaborative, thus, conciliatory effort. Notwithstanding the fact that Malayalam Cinema has always emulated Hollywood in leaving things unsaid, Puzhu leaves the audience with too much to guess, taking a bit of pleasure out of the viewing experience, making it darker than warranted. The film’s runtime of less than two hours is a plus and Puzhu is definitely worth a watch.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Topics: mammootty parvathy .
Loading Comments...
Puzhu is the most recent in a series of malayalam films that have explored and elaborated on the ways in which caste hatred and violence works in kerala’s body politic and social life..
Published : Jun 12, 2022 18:00 IST
READ LATER SEE ALL Remove
A scene from Puzhu (2022), starring Mammooty. | Photo Credit: By Special Arrangement
The OTT release of Puzhu , a debut film by director Ratheena P.T. starring Mammootty, has triggered discussions about the brahminical mindset and its unholy potencies. It has also prompted one to probe into the many legacies of caste in Malayalam cinema.
Parvathy Thiruvothu with Ratheena P.T., the director of Puzhu (2022). | Photo Credit: By Special Arrangement
Historically, casteism, like misogyny, has been ever present, both within Malayalam film narratives and in the film industry. It can be traced right back to the first Malayalam film, Vigathakumaran (1928) directed by J.C. Daniel, and the traumatic experience of its heroine, the Dalit actor P.K. Rosy. Rosy was hounded out of Thiruvananthapuram for daring to act in a film; the very sight of a low-caste woman on the silver screen enraged the upper-caste audience of the film and society at large.
Down the decades, this legacy of casteism continued in many subterranean forms, modes, and hues. In the 1950s and 1960s,when Malayalam cinema was coming into its own, social realism was the aesthetic norm. The film narratives of the time, largely based on literary and theatrical works, frontally dealt with issues of social inequality, class divide, caste oppression, and untouchability. All the major films of the 1950s, such as Jeevitanauka (“Boat of Life”, 1951) directed by K. Vembu, Neelakkuyil (“Blue Koel”, 1954) directed by P. Bhaskaran and Ramu Kariat, and Rarichan Enna Pauran (“Rarichan the Citizen”, 1956) directed by P. Bhaskaran, had caste at the core of their narratives.
Wearing their progressiveness on their sleeves, these films were populated by characters who wore and bore caste marks. The humiliations and conflicts of Dalits were enacted and elaborated not in the caste register but essentially as an economic and class issue/condition. And they were always framed within the larger narrative as the struggles of the citizen-to-be of the newly independent nation or as the emergence of the new secular individual of the modern age.
A still from Neelakkuyil (1954), one of the earliest Malayalam films with caste at the core of its narrative. | Photo Credit: By Special Arrangement
In Neelakkuyil , the Dalit woman Neeli is betrayed by the upper-caste schoolmaster, socially ostracised, and finally driven to utter misery and suicide. But the film ends with the reunion of a happy nuclear family, when the “reformed” schoolmaster, along with his barren upper-caste wife, finally decides to welcome his son born of Neeli into their “family”.
In many ways, the story of Malayalam cinema in the decades that followed originates from this guilt-ridden, sterile family that is forced to accept a Dalit boy born out of wedlock as their son. Love and betrayal, marriage and sterility, guilt and adoption—these are themes that underlie the “progressive” narrative of Neelakkuyil . It is also notable that the film is ambivalent about the figure of the schoolmaster, conventionally an agent of modernity and progress in the narratives of the time. His repentance and eventual “adoption” of his out-of-wedlock son into his upper-caste family has more to do with childlessness than remorse about his betrayal.
At the centre of the literary discourse and aesthetic imagination of the period was the conflict between the socialist-realist ethos that put class at the centre and the modernist-existentialist despair of the individual. Issues of caste never easily jelled with either of these trajectories of imagination and became marginal or incidental. The aesthetic discourse and artworks of the period gave one the feeling that Kerala was living in a post-caste society. The films of the time narrated the stories of secular, modern individuals who pined for love and struggled to create a new, egalitarian world devoid of all kinds of inequality and unfreedom.
In the following decades, that is, the mid 1970s to the 1990s—from Emergency to globalisation—explicit references to caste oppression and violence became largely invisible and unspoken. If at all it had to be dealt with, it was only hinted at subtly and indirectly. The upper-caste milieu became the home ground of Malayalam cinema and the Valluvanadan lingo popularised by the scripts of M.T. Vasudevan Nair, its official language. Characters from the lower-caste and minority communities either appeared at the margins or were packaged into stereotypes. Even the practitioners of “art” cinema shunned the caste question, never placing it at the narrative centre or confronting it as a core social issue
A still from Perariyathavar (2015). | Photo Credit: By Special Arrangement
The marginalisation of the caste question was further entrenched with the rise of Hindutva politics in the national horizon. Within cinematic narratives, this took the form of macho superstar heroes who flaunted their upper-caste insignia and heritage and harped directly and indirectly upon “merit”.
Interestingly, in the late 1980s and 1990s, two major actors—Sreenivasan and Kalabhavan Mani—brought caste brought back into mainstream narratives. Sreenivasan smuggled in the issue of caste, skin colour, and merit through his scripts, and in a series of films in which he was paired with Mohanlal, Mani embodied and asserted Dalit identity in all its dimensions: masculinity, voice, figure, and power. There is a scene in Mani’s first major film appearance ( Sallapam , 1995), where one of the villagers taunts a toddy tapper (played by Mani) whose name is suggested as a singer for the upcoming village festival: “A toddy tapper to sing? How good will that sound?” That comment voiced the loud and clear articulation of the Malayalam film industry’s mindset. But Mani defied all the derision to carve a space for himself in popular cinema and music, acting in more than 200 films in Malayalam, Telugu, and Tamil. Even at the peak of Mani’s career, many major actresses refused to be paired with him. Both Sreenivasan and Mani represent an era dominated by superstars and upper-caste narratives, where one had to either find devious ways to talk about caste or pay the price for it.
It is in the new millennium, coinciding with the end of the superstar era, that caste made its reappearance. The reasons could be many. For one, identity politics was gaining momentum; Ambedkar was emerging as an icon; and subaltern resistance was gathering momentum across the country and in regional cinemas. The shift to digital technology enabled many young film-makers to experiment with new themes and formats. They toppled the macho superstar reign, brought narratives down to the human scale, and foregrounded hitherto marginalised milieus and lives. For the small and nimble Malayalam film industry, the pandemic and closure of theatres proved a blessing in disguise. Young film-makers made several films on subversive themes on shoestring budgets. Released on OTT platforms, these films received critical acclaim and also commercial appeal nationally and globally.
A still from Ozhivudivasathe Kali (2015) directed by Sanalkumar Sasidharan. | Photo Credit: By Special Arrangement
In fact, over the last decade, it is independent films such as Perariyathavar by Dr Biju, Ozhivudivasathe Kali by Sanalkumar Sasidharan, Kari by Shanavas Nuranipuzha, Pathinonnam Sthalam by Ranjit Chittade, and Aaradi by Saji Palamel that have searingly explored and elaborated on the umpteen insidious ways in which caste works in Kerala, ripping asunder its “progressive” and “secular” facade. These films narrate the subtle subterranean ways in which caste hatred and violence work through the sinews and nerves of Kerala’s body politic and social life, showing how money, language, food, community, neighbourhood ethics, and party affiliations are imbricated in it. Commercial films, too, responded to the anti-caste, anti-patriarchy mood in the air. Puzhu is the latest to emerge in this stream.
From Pathinonnam Sthalam (2017), directed by Ranjit Chittade. | Photo Credit: By Special Arrangement
Puzhu belongs to the “woke” generation and genre where popular elements are smartly combined with politically correct themes. The man at the centre of Puzhu is Kuttan (played by Mammootty), who embodies all evil in society. He combines within himself the darkest aspects of caste, state, and money power: He is brahmin, a real-estate schemer, and a police officer. And now his life is plagued by the ghosts of the past, arising both from his toxic brahminical pride and his brutally corrupt career. Puzhu’ s narrative revolves around two contrasting families, one patriarchal-autocratic and the other secular-democratic: that of Kuttan and his adolescent son Kichu, and that of Kuttappan, a Dalit stage artist (played by Appunni Sasi) and his wife Bharati (played by Parvathy Thiruvothu), who is also Kuttan’s sister. We get only scant glimpses into their past: we come to know that Kuttan’s wife is no more, and that it is Bharati’s second marriage. Kuttan’s internal conflicts and the tension between these families are aggravated when Bharati and her husband move into the apartment complex where Kuttan stays.
Kuttan is a man whose world is devoid of the world; enclosed and insulated, with all hints of the other banished from it. Casteist to the core, he is devastated when his sister marries Kuttappan. He supervises his son’s life in minute detail, through ritualised everyday routines: brushing teeth, eating, online music lessons, a daily report of events at school, homework, prayers, watching his mother on video, and going to bed. From personal hygiene to how to deal with “outsiders”, Kuttan reigns over every aspect of Kichu’s life. It is through this obsession with routine that Kuttan fights the spectres from his violent past.
In constant fear of enemies stalking him, he hunts down an easy victim, Paul Varghese, an erstwhile accomplice who was later betrayed by Kuttan himself. From his business discussions, we understand that Kuttan is involved in shady real estate projects. In effect, he is a deadly mix of fear, suspicion, cowardice, caste pride, arrogance, and violence.
A still from Puzhu (2022), starring Parvathy Thiruvothu and Appunni Sasi. The film revolves around two families, one patriarchal-autocratic and the other secular-democratic. | Photo Credit: By Special Arrangement
The only person he opens up to is his mother, who is bedridden and paralysed; in scenes reminiscent of Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho , Kuttan pours out his anguish, anger, and grief to her. With everyone else, he either commands or negotiates. He drives Paul Varghese to suicide, never trusts his business partner Jalal, recommends the dismissal of security staff at his apartment, dismisses the servants at his farmhouse on mere suspicion, and mercilessly gases the dog in his apartment. At one point, he even manhandles his son. In the name of the state, he puts Kabir in prison on terrorism allegations; in the name of caste honour, he murders his own sister and her husband. But the past eventually catches up with him in the form of Ameer, son of Kabir, who sneaks into his bastion like the mythical Thakshaka to take revenge.
The narrative of the film is framed by the mythological story of Thakshaka, the snake that finds its way into King Parikshit’s hideout in the form of a worm to kill him. In the film, the myth appears as a play performed by Kuttappan. We see three segments: the opening sequence where the king is out hunting in the forest; the episode where the king humiliates the sage by garlanding him with a dead snake and is cursed to be killed by Thakshaka; and the final scene of the confrontation between Kuttan and Ameer, where the sage addresses the king: “This is transmigration to take revenge; for that, the forest will reach the sea....”
In depicting Kuttan as monster; Bharati as woman caught between the anger, phobia, and ideals of men; Kuttappan as Dalit evangelist; Kichu and Paul Varghese as cowering victims; and Ameer as missionary assassin, Puzhu essentialises identities. It also conflates historic injustice and systemic violence with psychic disorder. In the process, it forecloses all the doors to reflection, ambiguity, redemption, or transformation. The film is best seen as a historical revenge against all the casteist, patriarchal upper-caste heroes and narratives that have ruled Malayalam cinema until now.
The caste factor also transforms into the cast. Ignoring the immanent power of caste in Kerala society, the film symbolically exorcises it by invoking in the star persona of Mammootty, who plays Kuttan, all the evils one can imagine: he is an abusive father, a corrupt police officer, a brutal real estate operator, and, above all, a brahmin who will go to any length to protect caste honour. It is the exact reversal of the umpteen macho-brahminical superman roles Mammootty has played in the past. So, it is a revenge within and without.
A still from Puzhu (2022). Kuttan is the exact reversal of the umpteen macho-brahminical superman roles Mammootty has played in the past. | Photo Credit: YouTube Screengrab
The problem with revenge narratives is that they only cancel the other and annul all possibilities of transformation, which is what art, as against certain forms of political activism, is all about. Revenge settles scores but does not pose any ethical challenges to the unjust order or to hegemonies of any kind: brahminical, patriarchal, or statist.
By closing in on itself, the narrative also forecloses any imagination of potential futures, locking life and the world into an endless cycle of revenge. None of the characters in Puzhu is transformed or liberated in any way internally or externally: Kuttan is killed, leaving his assassin with no future; both Bharati, who crosses caste boundaries, and Kuttappan, the Dalit artist, are brutally murdered by Kuttan; Kichu faces an uncertain future as an orphan who will be brought up by his now even more vengeful paternal brahmin family. What is left at the end is the pungent taste of death and the poisonous vapours of revenge. How liberatory is a revenge narrative to deal with the complex hierarchies and devious operations of caste? Even while sharing its anger and outrage, these are some of the troubling questions that Puzhu leaves behind.
CONTRIBUTE YOUR COMMENTS
SHARE THIS STORY
Adivasi perspective, oil and oman’s women.
Flq - the frontline quiz.
Terms & conditions | Institutional Subscriber
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment
Mammootty is spectacular in ratheena’s ‘puzhu’ (sonyliv), the rare film where a man from a dominant caste is depicted as a victim.
In an early scene in Ratheena's Puzhu , a young boy reads aloud pages from a textbook. These pages are about the "toilet-cleaning community" and how Gandhiji opposed this. Many decades later, little seems to have changed. Some people from these communities may not be actually cleaning toilets anymore, but in the minds of the dominant castes, they might as well be. Mammootty's sister, Parvathy, has married one such man and Mammootty's every body cell screams in disgust that his Brahmin house, his Brahmin family, has been polluted by a "toilet-cleaner". Can you see body cells scream on screen? This great, great actor proves that you can. Internalised emotion is the most difficult to externalise in front of a camera, and Mammootty does this consistently in this film, and extraordinarily. His eyes, his clenched jaw, his posture – everything recoils from the "pollution" his sister brought into the family.
The little boy reading from his textbook – he's Mammootty' son. Ratheena shoots their scenes very formally, with almost static frames that reflect their robotic relationship. Outside this house, the camera is more free-flowing. The jarring visual juxtapositions and what they imply made me recall the weird films of Yorgos Lanthimos. (Just wait till you see the morbid video father and son watch repeatedly.) Mammootty teaches his son to share, but he also teaches the boy not to take what "they" give. This may be the first film about caste in India, where a man from a dominant caste is depicted as a victim. At least, he considers himself a victim, thanks to his sister, who has moved into the same building with her husband.
Mammootty's victimhood is literalised by the fact that someone seems to be trying to kill him. Naturally, this is what he thinks: Who else could it be but his brother-in-law, the man from the oppressed caste, who has moved into the same building, thus transcending class barriers, and has also transcended caste barriers by becoming a decorated playwright? The film is bookended by stage performances that lead us into the narrative and out of it. And Jakes Bejoy's unobtrusive score is perfect. He does not need to pile on the strings because Mammootty's nerves are already jangling with tension. As a side note, even the music Mammootty uses to relax is Carnatic music, traditionally associated with dominant castes.
His son wants to be freer, play with other children no matter what their caste or class – but Mammootty controls the boy with the force that still seeks to keep social structures intact. And is he really being attacked by someone, or are these hallucinations, brought on by his sense of victimhood due to social order that is no longer what it was, at least in the bigger towns and cities? Ratheena has created a remarkable protagonist – played by a remarkable actor – on whom you can project the root cause of every social evil. She has a terrific sense of composition (Theni Eswar is the superb cinematographer), and the film makes every shot count. When Mammootty fixes a big bolt on his door, it feels like he'd rather live in isolation than face this changing society again.
But the writing does not match up. There is a beautiful scene where Mammootty tells his son he did not remarry after his wife died because he wanted his whole life to revolve around the boy. Mammootty, thus, comes across as a fully-formed character, both good and evil. But the excessive focus on the protagonist leaves the other characters stranded. Would Parvathy not feel the faintest bit of apprehension about meeting her brother again? Would her husband not feel the least bit wary about Mammootty? Yes, you could interpret this in the larger sense that the man – or anyone from the oppressed-caste – does not need to live in fear anymore. But films are about particular characters and particular situations, and I was never convinced about the relationship triangle formed between these three adults.
As for the ending, it is a major disappointment. Maybe Ratheena wanted to echo the play inside her film with a stage device: the deus ex machina, the thing that comes almost out of nowhere and brings the story to an end. But again, this is not convincing, especially when you think back about some very specific things that have happened with Mammootty. It's perhaps best to read the film as an allegory, given the title Puzhu , which means worm, and which plays a major role in the play within the film. The worm destroys a mighty king. But even this reading falls apart when we see what happens to Parvathy and her husband. Puzhu is a rock-solid debut, but by focusing on its protagonist – the dominant-caste character – it inadvertently reduces the others to lesser people, lower down in the "cast" hierarchy. The subtle message of equality would have come across stronger had everyone been equal.
National Award-winning film critic Baradwaj Rangan, former deputy editor of The Hindu and senior editor of Film Companion, has carved a niche for himself over the years as a powerful voice in cinema, especially the Tamil film industry, with his reviews of films. While he was pursuing his chemical engineering degree, he was fascinated with the writing and analysis of world cinema by American critics. Baradwaj completed his Master’s degree in Advertising and Public Relations through scholarship. His first review was for the Hindi film Dum, published on January 30, 2003, in the Madras Plus supplement of The Economic Times. He then started critiquing Tamil films in 2014 and did a review on the film Subramaniapuram, while also debuting as a writer in the unreleased rom-com Kadhal 2 Kalyanam. Furthermore, Baradwaj has authored two books - Conversations with Mani Ratnam, 2012, and A Journey Through Indian Cinema, 2014. In 2017, he joined Film Companion South and continued to show his prowess in critiquing for the next five years garnering a wide viewership and a fan following of his own before announcing to be a part of Galatta Media in March 2022.
Thanks for visiting GALATTA.
Please turn off your ad blocker in order to continue.
Without ads, we can't offer free content to our users.
Thanks again!
Article by Cinephile Published by GulteDesk --> Published on: 2:22 pm, 14 May 2022
Streaming On : SonyLIV Director : Ratheena Cast : Mammootty, Parvathy Thiruvothu and others Banner : Wayfarer Films, Cyn-Cyl Celluloid Music : Jakes Bejoy Type : Movie
Ever since ‘Kasaba’ movie issue, when Parvathy opined against a problematic scene in that movie, there has been some friction that developed between Mammmoty fans and Parvathy Thiruvothu, so when an announcement came saying that Both Parvathy and Mammootty are to be seen in a movie called “Puzhu”, everyone hoped this might calm the issue that’s been between fans and actress, So there was some curiosity factor surrounding the release of Puzhu, it finally released on SonyLiv on last Friday, let’s see how the movie is:
Puzhu is a very subtle movie that mixes drama and thriller genres with a bit of psychological touch, it deals with two-story lives, one is of Kuttan(Mammooty), a police officer with old school values, and his strict nature of dynamics affecting badly to his son, other is of Bharati(Parvathy), sister of Kuttan who married a theatre artist Kuttappan (AppuniSasi) against her family wishes. However, things start to heat up when Bharati and her husband make their move into the apartment in which Kuttan is staying, what follows next is a creeping drama with some intriguing scenes consisting of menacing Mammooty.
The story by Harshad is very novel, very rarely do our filmmakers deal with issues such as stress and paranoia, addressing the severe consequences of having terrible mental health, Harshad had one hell of a story in his hands that also has a caste-discrimination angle in it, it’s a very strong story and complex one indeed, Director Ratheena tries her best to elevate proceedings very simply yet making a strong impact in our minds because of the dark nature of the story with the phenomenal presentation of Mammmoty character under negative shades.
However, it’s at the climax portion the movie fizzled out, Puzhu is a slow burner, for such movies, the ending portions are very important, they only the decide the fate of the movie, The story takes an unexpected turn that feels generic, and weak.
The best part of the movie is it doesn’t underline the points of caste issues (that still persist in our country), and overcoming that, it simply makes them with very key subtle scenes, and at pre-climax, there is a shocking scene related to that, we will be hooked to our seats at that instance but the next act makes it all go in vain.
Performances wise Mammooty is brilliant, this is easily one of his finest performances, he hasn’t performed that many negative characters, but the least he did were all exceptional, and Mammooty as Kuttan continues that legacy, in many instances his performance in that grey character Kuttan like feeling stressed out, or being cold to his son or being frightened disturbs us and evokes a mysterious and little horror feel to the movie, his face/expressions at those moments were damnn good and real making you believe this man needs some psychiatrist help, at pre-climax when his character becomes dark he’ll make you speechless. Parvathy and the rest of the cast were fine in their respective roles adding what exactly was needed with their performances.
Technical departments of Puzhu were good, Editing by Deepu joseph is neat, having just 1hr55 mins runtime is a very interesting choice for slow-burners, and music by Jakes Bejoy is superb, his bgm manages to give a spooky feel to this “Drama” movie, Cinematography by TheniEswar is fine, the color palette feels natural.
Positives :
Final Word : Watch Puzhu for one breathtaking performance by Mammotty, But the unimpressive climax make’s it strictly an average Fare.
Tags Mammmoty Puzhu Puzhu Review
Click Here for Recommended Movies on OTT (List Updates Daily)
Ratheena’s directorial debut film, ‘Puzhu’, translates to ‘worm’. Jointly written by Harshad, Sharfu and Suhas, the film appears almost wormly in its treatment of various issues like casteism, Islamophobia, unresolved trauma and abusive parenthood. Created as a slow-burning thriller, the film creeps up your skin just like the worm that Takshak turned himself into to kill Parikshit, which also happens to be the mythological reference with which the film begins and ends.
The brilliance of ‘Puzhu’ lies in the fact that it does not preach what we already know. The simplicity with which it shows the bigotry of the central character Kuttan, played by the brilliant Mammoty, might remind one of the simplicity of Joe Baby’s ‘The Great Indian Kitchen’. It shows how society operates through the narrative of toxic love and also establishes how utopian the idea of change actually is.
The film primarily focuses on the tense relationship between Kuttan and his son. Being a widower, Kuttan gives all his attention to his son, which turns suffocating and toxic. Kuttan himself has survived an abusive father and clearly has unresolved issues of his own. He believes he is giving his son a much better life simply because he is not beating him up like his father used to do. Kuttan’s issues are deeply seated in his psyche, and as the narrative progresses, we realise there is really no hope left for this character.
The film appears thematically similar to another Malayalam film ‘Kala’; however, the way ‘Puzhu’ deals with issues of casteism, toxic masculinity and oppressive parenthood is vastly different from it. While in ‘Kala’, almost all the tension had manifested itself through physical violence, there was barely any physical struggle seen in ‘Puzhu’. The violence here works on a mental level, and that is what makes it even more uncomfortable to watch because each minute of the film makes the audience brew with anticipation of something violent happening and yet gives them that relief almost toward the end of the film.
What struck me as the most interesting aspect of the film is the treatment of the character of Kuttappan, played by Appunni Sasi. He is a successful playwright and actor belonging to a lower caste who has married Bharati, Kuttan’s sister. However, Kuttappan’s rage is barely visible in his personality and action, and instead, he rather channels it in his plays. He is always seen with a smile, almost never losing his temper. He is denied places of residence because of his caste; his wife’s brother clearly despises him, and yet he takes it all with a calming smile because he is way too aware of the reality to expect anything else. The only time he loses his temper is when a government employee comments on the absurdity of his marriage to an upper caste Bharati and even after that, he is quick to resolve the issue.
Kuttappan is someone who does not bow to the system but does so with such a matter-of-fact attitude that it reminded me of the characters of the show ‘Atlanta’, who weren’t really surprised at anything that came their way because of a bigoted system.
Throughout the film, we keep anticipating something to happen. We expect Kuttan’s visible rage to topple over, and that actually does happen. Toward the end of the film, the issues of honour killing and Islamophobia are dealt head-on with extreme results. The stoicism with which Kuttan does as he pleases almost appears surreal and is bound to make the viewers question how far we have in reality come across as a society, with all the ‘wokeness’ we see around us.
Throughout the film, we keep anticipating something to happen. We expect Kuttan’s visible rage to topple over, and that actually does happen. Toward the end of the film, the issues of honour killing and Islamophobia are dealt head-on with extreme results. The stoicism with which Kuttan does as he pleases almost appears surreal and is bound to make the viewers question how far we have in reality come across as a society, with all the ‘wokeness’ we see around us. Image source: The Hindu
The society in which Kuttan resides might remind one of the Sunflower society (from the show of the same name), where a number of the residents believed they belonged above everyone and had a status to maintain and so denied residence to anyone and everyone who they did not deem fit. The film is a hauntingly beautiful commentary on the concept of outsiders and how it is the ones belonging to the privileged strata of the society who bring along the concept of the “other” to make their existence more meaningful and give them a sense of purpose.
Also read: Cinema Of Male Apathy: Rape Scenes In Malayalam Films Through The Ages
The ending of the film proved that Kuttan was not wrong in thinking that someone wanted to kill him. The audience probably would have liked it better if his fears were proven to be baseless because that seemed like something an overtly self-focused person like him would do. The ending, though a bit hasty, highlights the fact that the judiciary system keeps failing innocent people and sometimes, one is pushed to take the law into their own hands. Kuttan causes four murders in the film, both actively and passively and yet nothing would have happened to him because of the class he belongs to.
The film works well as a thriller while never failing to comment on the failing society we live in. It is very concise in its plot construction as well as characterisation, and that is why the commentary it presents on heavyweight issues like parental abuse, casteism and Islamophobia never appear as preaching. It proceeds rather slowly but keeps the viewers on the edge of their seats with its foreshadowing quality. This is what makes it one of the films that should not really be missed.
Also read: Film Review: Biriyani – A Gripping Take On The Life Of Muslim Women In Kerala
Pramila is a postgraduate in English Language and Literature who is finding her way through life with a lot of chaos but definite progress. She attempts to be a voracious reader and is a bit obsessed with the new genre of sadcom shows that are on the rise. Trying to be a better feminist every day, she survives on books, tea, and all things blue. She can be found on Facebook .
Featured image source: Firstpost , Scroll
By Dr. Guni Vats
By Rohin Sarkar
By Stuti Paul Singh
This image released by Greenwich Entertainment shows Ian McKellen in a scene from “The Critic.” (Greenwich Entertainment via AP)
This image released by Greenwich Entertainment shows Ian McKellen, left, and Gemma Arterton in a scene from “The Critic.” (Greenwich Entertainment via AP)
The arts rarely have anything good to say about critics. That they’re not generally the hero of many stories is, at the very least, understandable. More often they’re portrayed as joyless, cruel and a little pathetic; themselves failed artists who live to take down others, or, worse, sycophants in search of a famous friend.
Without getting into any sort of philosophical, or even factual debate about the nature of the kind of person drawn to criticism (besides perhaps a staunch antipathy to either job security or amassing wealth), it is safe to say that the drama critic of “ The Critic ” takes all the worst stereotypes to hysterical heights.
Set in the 1930s in London, Ian McKellen is Jimmy Erskine, a veteran theater critic whose reviews can make or break a play or a performer. He has a monastic devotion to telling the truth, as entertainingly as he can, and knows what he must sacrifice to do so.
“The drama critic is feared and reviled for the judgement he must bring,” McKellen says in an ominous voiceover. “(He) must be cold and perfectly alone.”
When one woman dares to chat him up after a play, offering her take on the material and performances, he swiftly tries to have her removed from the restaurant claiming he must be protected from the general public. When an actress, Nina Land (Gemma Arterton), confronts him about his wildly inconsistent criticisms of her (how can she be both plump and emaciated, she wonders), he refuses to apologize. And he scoffs when the new boss at the newspaper, David Brooke (Mark Strong), implores him to tone it down: “Be kinder,” he says. “More beauty, less beast.”
But what starts as satire spirals into a wildly messy tragedy with contrivance upon contrivance. This is a film that could have listened to its anti-hero’s advice to the flailing actress: Do less. That someone as great as Lesley Manville, as Nina’s mother, gets a mere handful of scenes and is only minimally consequential to it all is telling. It strives to be an intricate spider-web of compelling, intersecting stories, but few characters are fleshed out enough for us to care.
“ The Critic ,” handsomely directed by Anand Tucker (“Hilary and Jackie,” “Leap Year”) and written by Patrick Marber (“Closer,” “Notes on a Scandal”), is very loosely based on Anthony Quinn’s novel “Curtain Call,” itself more a murder mystery than this ever allows itself to be. Instead, the film is about the desperate lengths a man will go to when his job and freedom are threatened. Erskine is the kind of gentleman critic whose power and authority have gone unchallenged for so long, he’s become delusional beyond recognition. His words don’t just destroy, though. They’ve also inspired. Even the actress he obliterates time and time again admits as much: She tells him it was his writing that made her fall in love with the theater.
There are some fun ideas here, and good performances. McKellen is having a wonderful time living inside this charismatic monster who you are with until you’re really not. Erskine is also gay; an open secret that becomes a liability with his new boss and the rise of fascist thought around him. But none of it really adds up to anything poignant or enormously entertaining; its darkness is both lopsided and superficial, as most become casualties of Erskine’s aims. Theater critic as tyrant is a juicy premise; “The Critic” just can’t live up to the promise.
“The Critic,” a Greenwich Entertainment release in select theaters Friday, is rated R by the Motion Picture Association for “some language and sexual content.” Running time: 100 minutes. Two and a half stars out of four.
Subscribe for full access to The Hollywood Reporter
‘daniela forever’ review: henry golding and beatrice grannò are underserved in nacho vigalondo’s scattered sci-fi drama.
The 'Colossal' helmer's latest revolves around a heartbroken man who joins a trial drug program that reunites him with his deceased girlfriend in his dreams.
By Lovia Gyarkye
Arts & Culture Critic
Sandra oh doubles reel asian film fest donation to $100k, maura delpero's venice-winning period drama 'vermiglio' lands north american distribution , daniela forever.
Before Daniela Forever goes off the rails in a disappointing series of twists, it pulls us in with a visual style (cinematography by Jon D. Dominguez) that distinguishes it from others with a familiar premise — grief, dreams and the technology that can eliminate the first and realize the second. Nicolas’ reality is presented in a claustrophobic 4:3 aspect ratio and the muted, grainy aesthetics of an old-school camcorder. Vigalondo (who made 2016’s offbeat Anne Hathaway sci-fi Colossal ) reverts to widescreen and sharper images for Nicolas’ dream world. Here, the colors are more vibrant and the mood appropriately verges on the uncanny.
Vigalondo’s screenplay breezes through how Nicolas learns of this secret drug program and how he becomes a rogue patient. The researchers tell him that he must read specific prompts, written to conjure certain memories, before taking the pill. But after he spills water on one of the notecards, rendering it unreadable, Nicolas thinks about Daniela and finds himself preferring that dreamscape. To hide his actions, he lies during his daily interviews with the scientists.
Most of Daniela Forever observes Nicolas moving between his reality and the dream world, avoiding one while fiending for the other. The beleaguered DJ spends his days waiting for night when he will be reunited with Daniela. The screenplay vaguely sketches the details of his waking life, but the real action takes place in his dream world. Although Vigalondo offers compelling ideas about the mechanics of lucid dreaming — how Nicolas controls scenes and what dream Daniela remembers — the director doesn’t do much else. There’s an aimlessness to the story, and a disappointing lack of stakes . Vigalondo teases some complicated threads of Nicolas’ personality, but never digs in. Instead, Daniela Forever resolves any tensions before they can ever be confronted.
The same is true of Grannò’s Daniela, who at one point seems to possess a consciousness of her own like Samantha in Spike Jonze’s Her . Her character — a digital artist battling her own depression — comes off as confusing when considered within the film’s own logic. From what we know about dreams, they are constructed of experiences we have lived, rarely ones we haven’t.
Daniela Forever is a puzzling film that seems insecure in its own resolution. As Nicolas gets more turned around by the differences between his dreams and reality, so, too, does the film lose track of its purpose. And that doesn’t inspire much confidence — even for the most compliant of viewers.
Thr newsletters.
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day
Samurai thriller ’11 rebels’ to open tokyo international film festival, ‘friendship’ review: netflix funnyman tim robinson conquers the big screen in a squirmy bro-com co-starring paul rudd, hugh grant on why he has turned down starring in some big-budget studio films, ‘beetlejuice beetlejuice’ writers break down those two spectacular needle drops, toronto: daniel craig and nicole kidman take big swings in, are serious contenders for ‘queer’ and ‘babygirl’, tim blake nelson on playing an aging boxer in ‘bang bang,’ marvel and why he loves oldenburg.
Immersive, engaging and edgy, Hansal Mehta’s directorial and Kareena Kapoor Khan starrer The Buckingham Murders is a must watch not only for bereaved parents, but for all. The sharp silence of the film makes it all the more gripping. read more
Language: English, Hindi
Director: Hansal Mehta
Cast: Kareena Kapoor Khan, Ash Tandon, Ranveer Brar, Daniel Eghan, Rukku Nahar, Keith Allen
‘May no parent ever have to outlive their child’. In fact, this is the saddest and the darkest thing that can happen in any human being’s life. Hansal Mehta’s The Buckingham Murders film shows how Jass Bhamra (Kareena Kapoor Khan) is dealing with the grief of losing his son. There is something really special to this slow-burn crime thriller which one shouldn’t miss.
The film starts with Jass (Kareena Kapoor Khan) going on transfer to some other city in the UK because the house where she lives and the city has memories of her baby son whom she lost recently in a gun shootout by a fanatic. Though she got justice and the man was caught, but that is not going to bring back her child.
Everybody has a different way of dealing with grief and so does British Indian detective Jass Bhamra (Kareena Kapoor Khan) and she has beautifully depicted it just through the expressions of her eyes. Immersive, engaging and edgy, The Buckingham Murders is a must watch not only for bereaved parents, but for all.
The story goes this way Jasmeet Bhamra aka Jas, (Kareena Kapoor Khan) has to solve a murder mystery British town even though she is not in the good state of her mind after losing her only son. The wounds are deep and fresh. She is struggling to cope with her mental state. It’s a complicated case and it’s about a missing child. Though she insists to her boss that she is not in the right frame of mind to deal with this situation and to solve the case, her boss insists that life has to go on and that duty comes first.
The Buckingham Murders is not only murder mystery, but deals with several issues like immigration problem, communal disharmony, teenage problems, drug abuse and LGBTQ issues. I have huge respect for Hansal Mehta’s craft for bringing out the best in all actors and his way of dealing with issues that are closer to our hearts.
Kareena Kapoor Khan film The Buckingham Murders teaches us that we shouldn’t hurry with justice especially when there are kids involved. We all know that ‘justice delayed is justice denied’. But at the same time we need to understand that ‘justice hurried is justice buried’. And that’s exactly what the film is about. When a Sikh boy goes missing from a British town, a Muslim boy becomes the prime accused. But is the Muslim boy actually the culprit or is it someone from the family?
Haunted by the loss of her only son, forty-something single mother, Jass Bhamra (Kareena Kapoor Khan) has no other option but to continue with her duty. She immerses herself into work, yet the snap shots of her son comes flashing in front of her eyes like moody mirages. She is a strong believer of stoic philosophy where she suppresses her emotions. Instead of sharing it with others, she believes in crying herself to sleep. Though occasionally she does have her emotional out bursts, but she is mostly calm. Her father is an only support and the old man too tries his best to spend as much time as he can with his daughter who is going through a terrible emotional turmoil.
Jass Bhamra’s (Kareena Kapoor Khan) grief is very personal and she doesn’t expect others to understand or empathize with her. All she wants is for the people around him to be sensitive when it comes to kid issues and especially when she is handling a complex case which involves kids, she believes that one needs to be all the more careful and that no kid should suffer for a crime he hasn’t done.
The best thing about the film is that there is no unnecessary shouting or drama, there is sharp silence which is like a knife making a deep wound and that is what makes The Buckingham Murders movie all the more gripping. The film has also garnered tremendous appreciation at the BFI London Film Festival 2023 and the 2023 Mumbai Film Festival, with people speaking highly of the film.
The Buckingham Murders is releasing in theatres on 13 September 2024.
Rating: 4 out of 5
WATCH the trailer of Kareena Kapoor Khan’s The Buckingham Murders here:
Lachmi Deb Roy is the entertainment editor of Firtspost, Network18. She reviews films and series with a gender lens. Her interviews are called 'Not Just Bollywood' because she takes huge interest in world cinema. OTT over theatrical releases is her preference unless and until its a King Khan film. She takes interest in fashion, food and art reviews too. see more
Your changes have been saved
Email is sent
Email has already been sent
Please verify your email address.
You’ve reached your account maximum for followed topics.
Adam Driver’s dinosaur sci-fi adventure 65 may not have won over critics with its 36% Rotten Tomatoes score , but it’s proving to be a hit with audiences worldwide. Currently sitting at #3 on Prime Video’s Global Top 10, 65 is finding new life via streaming, landing in the top 10 in 28 countries across the globe. The wide-reaching success underscores the timeless appeal of dinosaurs and survival thrills for viewers young and old. Let's face it, who can resist one of our biggest stars going head-to-head with some prehistoric predators?
Directed by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods , 65 tells the story of an astronaut from another world, played by Driver , who crash-lands on a prehistoric Earth and must battle dangerous creatures to survive. Along the way, he encounters a young girl ( Ariana Greenblatt ) and the pair must work together to survive while Driver attempts to get back to his ship and escape.
Well, it's fair to say opinions were mixed. Collider's Chase Hutchinson wasn't exactly a fan , claiming it wasted Driver's talents. He wrote in his review:
"It was never going to be a masterpiece by any means, but it is bizarre just how boring it all feels. The main event of it all, Driver fighting a T-rex, is something the film teases for all its worth before it unfolds in the conclusion. This proves to be disappointing as, after all this wait, the sequence just doesn’t feel worth it and passes rather quickly. Once more, the persistent problem is how disconnected the two adversaries are and how poorly staged the entire thing remains. When you then look back on the entire experience, it is fascinating how fleeting it is and how little of an impact it all leaves. Though there are movies that are worse than 65 , it is part of a select few that manage to utterly and completely squander their own potential."
While the film struggled to impress critics during its theatrical release early last year, it seems the movie’s sci-fi action elements are resonating with home viewers. With stunning visual effects and intense action sequences, 65 delivers the kind of edge-of-your-seat excitement that makes it a must-watch on Prime Video. In the United States, the movie is currently available to view through Netflix and via video on demand, through retailers including Apple TV , Amazon Prime, and more. Despite mixed reviews, 65 is showing that the combination of Driver’s star power and the enduring fascination with dinosaurs is more than enough to draw in global audiences. Its inclusion in the top 10 charts in countries ranging from Brazil to France speaks to the universal appeal of "there's a big scary monster near us, we need to run, or it'll eat us."
As we’ve seen time and again, dinosaurs are box office (and streaming) gold, and 65 is further proof that audiences still can’t get enough of prehistoric thrills — even if the critics aren’t entirely on board. If you haven’t yet joined the ride, 65 is ready and waiting for you to stream on Netflix in the US and Prime Video across the world .
Watch on Netflix
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Puzhu Review : A tension-filled drama Anna Mathews, TNN, Updated: May 14, 2022, 11.23 AM IST Critic's Rating: 3.5 /5 Story: Former cop Kuttan battles personal and professional demons.
Puzhu movie review: Puzhu distinguishes itself from other movies that examine the dehumanising effects of the caste system by being completely non-judgemental. Rating: 4 out of 5 Written by Manoj Kumar R
Puzhu movie review: Mammootty's electrifying portrait of a bigot's persecution complex eclipses a mishandled climax. ... Rating: 4 (out of 5 stars) Puzhu is streaming on SonyLIV. Anna M.M. Vetticad is an award-winning journalist and author of The Adventures of an Intrepid Film Critic. She specialises in the intersection of cinema with ...
Puzhu: Directed by Ratheena. With Mammootty, Parvathy Thiruvothu, Vasudev Sajeesh Marar, Appunni Sasi. A gripping thriller with focus on the relationship between a father and son, and the underlying family dynamics and trust issues that follow.
Reviews. Puzhu Movie Review: Mammootty's Ascent Into Darkness Is A Stellar Study Of The Inheritance Of Prejudice. Director Ratheena chooses to transplant a myth onto an urban upper-caste milieu, where everyone's educated but there's still a vacuum when it comes to the most basic human value.
'Puzhu' review: Mammootty steers an absorbing tale of the haunted and the hunted Ratheena PT's Malayalam-language film is out on SonyLIV. Nandini Ramnath. May 13, 2022 · 08:45 am
Puzhu is a haunting film that throws some light on some of the most deeply-rooted issues in society. Mammootty's stellar performance is unarguably the heart and soul of this well-executed yet ...
No doubt. In my review of Bheeshma Parvam, I wrote that Mammootty's performance brought back memories of watching his 1990s films like Kauravar, Vatsalyam and Valyettan.Puzhu, too, has this nostalgia-inducing quality. The infinitely disturbing and menacing turn in Puzhu recalled the days when I watched him in films like Kariyilakkaattu Pole ...
The movie is taking enough time to establish the story so this slow-paced way of storytelling is demanding for a film like this so one may have to show a little bit of patience in between. 2: The theme of this film is strong and this same theme has been discussed in many films.
9/10. 💯 JUSTICE TO THE MOVIE NAME. skmenon1993 13 May 2022. Puzhu ( Worm ) starring Mammootty in lead role... Directed by Ratheena, Bankrolled by Wayfarer Films and S. George. Verdict of the Movie: Super Hit. Plot of the Movie: Mammootty playing as a retired police officer whose life restricted to him and his son.
Kuttan (Mammootty), a bigoted upper-caste retired police officer, is living an annoyingly disciplined life with his son Kichu (Vasudev Sajeesh Marar), who is outrightly afraid of his father and his obsessive compulsions. Kuttan is set in his ways. To Kuttan, tomato is a vegetable and strong teeth are white.
Director Ratheena has to be lauded for the stylized narrative. Puzhu is a deliberately slow-cooked meal and you will relish every bit of it. The intersection of mythology in a modern-day story ...
Having said that, Puzhu marks an important debut from someone who is clearly not ready to walk the beaten path. Ratheena's filmmaking is marked by its economy and quiet control, which adds to ...
Puzhu (aka) Puzhuu is a Malayalam movie. Mammootty, Parvathy Thiruvothu are part of the cast of Puzhu (aka) Puzhuu. ... PUZHU MOVIE REVIEW ... 1 hour 55 minutes Censor Rating : UA 16 ...
Puzhu Movie Review. Bharath Vijayakumar Puzhu is that film in which the performance of its leading actor is not just the USP of the film but is almost the film in itself. Mammootty plays Kuttan or that is how he is referred to by few characters in the film. ... Rating: 3/5 Streaming on SonyLiv. Story; Songs; Gallery; Videos; Critic Reviews ...
In Puzhu, directed by debutante Ratheena PT and written by Harshad, the upper-caste Hindu is a policeman, an IPS officer, with the power to create or destroy lives and manufacture narratives that would eventually creep into history textbooks.But unlike Desai's film, Puzhu is steeped in reality and a fine sense of justice. The film, which aspires to be a slow-burner, takes the viewer through ...
Puzhu (transl. Worm) is a 2022 Indian Malayalam-language psychological drama film directed by debutante Ratheena and jointly written by Harshad and Suhas-Sharfu. [1] The film stars Mammootty, Appunni Sasi and Parvathy Thiruvothu in the lead roles. Cinematography of the film is handled by Theni Eswar and the film score and songs are composed by Jakes Bejoy.
Saani Kaayidham Review. Directed by Ratheena, Puzhu -- starring Mammootty and Parvathy -- is a modern adaption of this tale. Kuttan (Mammootty) is a Brahmin police officer and widower who is ...
Review: Mammootty's 'Puzhu' Deserves Applause For Taking On Caste Head On. Ratheena PT's directorial debut Puzhu is a deeply political film couched in many shades of grey. The film marks ...
In effect, he is a deadly mix of fear, suspicion, cowardice, caste pride, arrogance, and violence. A still from Puzhu (2022), starring Parvathy Thiruvothu and Appunni Sasi. The film revolves around two families, one patriarchal-autocratic and the other secular-democratic. | Photo Credit: By Special Arrangement.
Puzhu Movie Cast & Crew. Cast : Mammootty , Parvathy Thiruvothu , Vasudev Sajeesh , Athmiya Rajan , Production : Wayfarer Films. Director : Ratheena. Music Director : Jakes Bejoy. The filmmaking ...
Technical departments of Puzhu were good, Editing by Deepu joseph is neat, having just 1hr55 mins runtime is a very interesting choice for slow-burners, and music by Jakes Bejoy is superb, his bgm manages to give a spooky feel to this "Drama" movie, Cinematography by TheniEswar is fine, the color palette feels natural. Positives : Negatives ...
Ratheena's directorial debut film, 'Puzhu', translates to 'worm'. Jointly written by Harshad, Sharfu and Suhas, the film appears almost wormly in its treatment of various issues like casteism, Islamophobia, unresolved trauma and abusive parenthood. Created as a slow-burning thriller, the film creeps up your skin just like the worm ...
Movie Review: In 'The Critic,' Ian McKellen's theater critic takes his job very seriously. ... Ian McKellen is Jimmy Erskine, a veteran theater critic whose reviews can make or break a play or a performer. He has a monastic devotion to telling the truth, as entertainingly as he can, and knows what he must sacrifice to do so. ...
The 'Colossal' helmer's latest revolves around a heartbroken man who joins a trial drug program that reunites him with his deceased girlfriend in his dreams. By Lovia Gyarkye Arts & Culture Critic ...
A still from The Buckingham Murders. The Buckingham Murders is not only murder mystery, but deals with several issues like immigration problem, communal disharmony, teenage problems, drug abuse and LGBTQ issues. I have huge respect for Hansal Mehta's craft for bringing out the best in all actors and his way of dealing with issues that are closer to our hearts.
Adam Driver's dinosaur sci-fi adventure 65 may not have won over critics with its 36% Rotten Tomatoes score, but it's proving to be a hit with audiences worldwide.Currently sitting at #3 on ...