smoking should be banned in public places opinion essay

Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places? Essay

Introduction, thesis statement, reasons for the ban of smoking in public places, the opposing views, economic point of view, social point of view, works cited.

Many governments across the globe have moved to ban smocking in public places. Whether the action is justified or not, is a matter of fierce debate. Often, the proponents of the proposition carry the day arguing that smoke from cigarette inhaled by non-smokers poses health risks.

Thus, the banning action is based on the premise that non-smokers should be protected from risks associated with proximity to cigarette smoke (Warner 71). The other premise is that effects of smoke whether directly inhaled or partially taken in proximity with smokers are the same. However, little attention has been given to the opposing views which have always been dismissed as baseless.

Most academic studies and researches have cited individual rights as the basis for smocking in public ignoring other factors such as economy, social as well as other individualistic reasons (Viscusi 31). Moreover, much attention has also been given to dangers posed by cigarette smoking specifically health problems while ignoring the opponent side of view.

Further, little research has also been conducted to ascertain some of the issues that support public smoking or smoking in general (Viscusi 31). This does not necessarily mean that smoking should be allowed. However, other factors should be considered. Besides, various options should be explored before imposing a ban on smoking cigarette in public.

Smoking in public places poses health risks to non smokers and should be banned. This paper will be discussing whether cigarette smoking should not be allowed in public places. First the paper will explore dangers associated with smoking in public and not on those who smoke, but on non-smokers.

The paper will then examine these propositions and ascertain whether they hold and establish counter arguments against the propositions. It is concluded that even though smoking poses health risks among the individuals, economic, social and individual values must be taken into consideration before a blanket ban on the practice is imposed (Abedian et al. 71).

The proponents of this rule have several arguments majorly based on scientific studies and results from health institutions. These arguments cannot be disputed, but over reliance on them is what makes the arguments a bit absurd (Warner 71).

However, various researches have always pointed health risks associated with smoking. Besides, smoking is an environmental hazard as much of the content in the cigarette contains chemicals and hydrocarbons that are considered to be dangerous to both life and environment (Lott and Richard 102).

Biologists and epidemiologists point out passive smoking is harmful to health. In other words, those who come in contact with second-hand smoke risk their health statuses (Lott and Richard 102). Several risks are associated with second-hand smoke that majority come in contact with in public places.

In most cases, partial smokers suffer from cardiac arrests, lung cancers, central nervous system impairments as well as other diseases caused by carcinogenic chemicals from cigarette smoke (Viscusi 35).

Other health conditions caused by smoking include asthma and other respiratory infections resulting from hydrocarbons and ammonia present in the second-hand smoke. Partial smokers also suffer from eye irritations, headaches and flu as a result of smoke particles (Viscusi and Joseph 10).

Findings from other scientific studies indicate that smoking reduces individual lifespan by a minimum of ten percent. The discovery also indicates that women are likely to suffer eleven years off their life expectancy. Moreover, people who smoke are more susceptible to certain forms of cancer that would have been avoided without smoking (Viscusi and Joseph 10). Smoking is injurious to health.

Those who have opposed the view on smoking ban in public places have been accused of citing individual rights to support their actions. In as much as they might be true, the weak point in this argument is that the rule applies to both smokers and non-smokers (Abedian et al. 71). Every one has a right to smoke and also not to smoke. Therefore, the argument based on the legal rights of an individual remains ambiguous.

From the economic point of view, smoking is an individual choice. Like any other product these individuals may be willing to buy, cigarette is a commodity that its consumers would want and willing to purchase. Indeed, people make everyday choices founded on their preferences, and these choices are often associated with hazards and reservations (Warner 71).

All social interactions that individuals are involved in could be associated with risks which, in most cases are greater than risks related to smoke that smokers’ exhale. The reason is that the expected outcomes of the social interactions are greater than the risks as well as the costs involved (Viscusi 40).

Therefore, it would be ridiculous to make a conclusion that smoking in public should be prohibited simply because it presents a number of risks.

Based on this argument, the number of fatalities from other causes such as accidents, sexual relations, other diseases such as flu and pneumonia which are communicable and easily spread in public places are by far numerous than the fatalities caused by the second-hand smoke.

In other words, the risk of contracting other diseases, dying from AIDS as a result of sexual relations as well as dying from accidents are five times higher than the risk of dying from a second-hand smoke (Abedian et al. 71).

The other attribute of the economic proposition is that it examines the method through which individual choices can be reconciled based on their preferences (Viscusi and Joseph 44).

That is, individuals who smoke and those who tend to avoid second-hand smoke. According to the economic studies, primary institutes such as contractual freedom and property rights offer an effectual solution more than formal regulations in fulfilling personal preference (Viscusi and Joseph 44).

Another factor that should also be taken into consideration is the degree to which a place is considered public (Warner 71). It should be understood that most of the public places were previously private places. The difference is that owners allow the public to access them purely for commercial purposes.

As such, the role of property rights should be implemented to stop public smoking. In this regard, much of the places considered public are private such as the work places, restaurants, buses and bars. These places are opened for all manner of customers’ smokers as well as non smokers. The owner should specify the target customers who are purely non-smokers.

Therefore, any smoker who enters in these establishments is held liable for any risk of second hand smoking. On the other hand, an establishment may require that only smokers enter its establishment. In such a situation, any establishment will not be held responsible for any risks associated with second hand –smoke in a case non smoker enters the establishment.

In both scenarios, there is economic efficiency for all the parties concerned based on their preferences. However, in the circumstances that there is no specificity and the definition of the public, the whole process becomes chaotic (Warner 71).

Socially, smoking has been perceived as being fashionable and stylist. This perception has been carried over from generations to generations. Smoking is not something new rather it has been practiced for centuries. In a critical examination as to why people have been smoking for centuries, the reason is because they derived pleasure that was closely related to fashion and style.

That is why people still smoke and younger generations find themselves to be smoking despite health warnings or knowledge of health risks associated with the practice (Lott and Richard 102). This value should not be undermined as scientists could not explain why some smokers stay longer than those who smoke. Moreover, smoking is not the only cause of all health related diseases.

The best possible strategy to control tobacco consumption should be put in place. This will uphold individual’s self-esteem and appreciate society preferences. Scientists and other health proponents argue that people should not be guaranteed to smoke openly.

However, the economical approach stipulates that the management should not impose a ban on some individuals’ day to day choices. In fact, people’s preferences are highly regarded in the general public. Banning public smoking could favor certain communities while offend the treaty-liberty and material goods privileges.

Abedian, Iraj, Merwe Rowena, Nick Wilkins and Prabhat Jha. The Economics of Tobacco Control: Towards an Optimal Policy Mix . Cape Town: University of Cape Town, 1998. Print. p. 71.

Lott, John and Richard Manning. “Have Changing Liability Rules Compensated Workers Twice for Occupational Hazards? Earning Premiums and Cancer Risks.” Journal of Legal Studies , 29.1 (2000): 99-128. Print.

Viscusi, Kip and Joseph Aldy. “The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates throughout the World.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 27.1 (2003): 5-76. Print.

Viscusi, Kip. “The Value of Life: Estimates with Risks by Occupation and Industry.” Economic Inquiry , 42.1 (2004): 29-48. Print.

Warner, Kenneth. The Economics of Tobacco and Health . Cape Town: University of Cape Town, 1998. Print. p. 71.

• Health Care Costs for Smokers
• The Health Care Sector in Taiwan
• On Why One Should Stop Smoking
• Smoking Ban in the United States of America
• Ethical Problem of Smoking
• Organizational Behavior in Health Care
• Quality in Health Care
• Keys to leadership in HCA
• Cost-effectiveness of the global health programs
• Institute for Healthcare Improvement Organization
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2019, April 15). Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places? https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-smoking-be-banned-in-public-places/

"Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?" IvyPanda , 15 Apr. 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/should-smoking-be-banned-in-public-places/.

IvyPanda . (2019) 'Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places'. 15 April.

IvyPanda . 2019. "Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?" April 15, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-smoking-be-banned-in-public-places/.

1. IvyPanda . "Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?" April 15, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-smoking-be-banned-in-public-places/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?" April 15, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-smoking-be-banned-in-public-places/.

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

• Basic site functions
• Ensuring secure, safe transactions
• Secure account login
• Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
• Remembering privacy and security settings
• Analyzing site traffic and usage
• Personalized search, content, and recommendations
• Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

• Remembering general and regional preferences
• Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy .

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy .

Band 6+: Should smoking be banned in public places? Do you agree or disagree

Smoking is banned in public spaces in numerous countries by governments since it imposes a major health threat on citizens’ lives; therefore, I am a staunch believer that people shouldn’t be allowed to fume in gathering spots if smoking areas are not available. This essay will explain the impact of tobacco use on health and will highlight how smoking adversely affects the economy.

To embark on, it is indisputable that smoking has detrimental effects on humans’ health, and it is one of the primary causes of cancer, lung diseases, and premature death. As a result, permitting this negative behaviour in shared locations may expose non-smokers’ lives to danger particularly children, pregnant women and older people. To illustrate, not only are active smokers affected by chemicals in tobacco, but also non-smokers, who breathe in their smoke, may develop the same illnesses over time. To give a clear example, some scientific findings have recently unveiled the fact that offspring who are diagnosed with respiratory diseases have been exposed to secondhand smoke; consequently, it is recommended that cigarette smoking be prohibited to protect youngsters’ heath and discourage them to adopt this unhealthy habit when they grow up.

In addition, Smoking has been regarded as one of the reasons of environment pollution. In other words, the huge amount of chemicals released from cigarettes into the air contributes to air contamination; moreover, cigarette filters, which are composed of plastic, take decades to decompose, leading to serious complications to the wild and marine life. For instance, when smokers finish their cigarettes, they throw the buds on the ground that latter are carried with water rain from streets to drains and then to rivers, seas and ultimately to oceans, affecting the aquatic creatures by their toxic compounds.

In conclusion, smoking should be restricted in public owing to its serious health and environmental issues; hence, it is recommended that governments inform their populations about the serious consequences unless they quit such a harmful habit.

Check Your Own Essay On This Topic?

Generate a band-9 sample with your idea, overall band score, task response, coherence & cohesion, lexical resource, grammatical range & accuracy, essays on the same topic:, should smoking be banned in public places do you agree or disagree.

Smoking is banned in public spaces in numerous countries by governments since it imposes a major health threat on citizens’ lives; therefore, I am a staunch believer that people shouldn’t be allowed to fume in gathering spots if smoking areas are not available. This essay will explain the impact of tobacco use on health and […]

Cigarette should be forbidden in society cause it bad for health also influence others. While it can be argued that smoking should not be banned other people feel that it become mandatory to forbidden. In this essay i will examine both this argument and give my overall opinion. Generally speaking there are wide range of […]

Other Topics:

Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries. do you agree or disagree give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience. write at least 250 words..

Some people believe that teaching their own language to their children is more important than teaching foreign languages. I agree to this idea to a certain extent because we should preserve our culture and teach the language that we have been passed on as a responsible person. With the advancment in technology and the rise […]

Children nowadays frequently watch TV and play computer games. Some people think that such activities do not help develop their mental abilities. DO you agree or disagree?

These days, because of the prevalence of video games and TV programs among adolescents , some people think that these activities will have a negative impact on children’s mental health. I will discuss my viewn on both sides due to reasons that are explained further. Playing computer game or watching TV can negatively affect children’s […]

The best way to address the environmental problem is to increase the cost of oil. Do you agree or disagree&

currently, environmental pollution has become so ubiquitous that we can see them everywhere. While I acknowledge the increasing the cost of fuel is the effective solution, it is better than that if human explore alternative energy resources. On the one hand, increasing fuel prices can motivate people to use public transport . Commuting cost will […]

Some people believe that college or university education should be available to all students. Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students?

It is difficult to define which part of education can be considered as students. Many experts say college or university teaching should be perfect for all students. On the other hand, some groups claim that graduate school education should be available only to good students. In my opinion, education depends on the Students to Students. […]

Some people think that the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment, while others believe that businesses mainly benefit. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is considered by some that international collaboration is the key to securing the environment, while there are others who think that firms mostly make profit out of it. This essay will discuss both perspectives, and I will share my opinion on the primary advantage of global cooperation. On the one hand, many people think […]

To learn effectively, children need to eat a healthy meal at school. How true is statement? Whose responsibility is it provide food for school children?

A healthy diet can help the effectiveness of the younger generation’s learning process. The food and drinks that they consumed will affect their physicals and mental health. This essay will provide reasons why it is important for students to have nutritious meals. The parents and schools are responsible for this. Children spend their most productive […]

Plans & Pricing

Although It Takes Away Some Freedom, Smoking Should be Banned in Public Places - Task 2 Band 9 Essay

Updated: Mar 20

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Although some people say it takes away some of our freedom, smoking should be banned in all public places.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.

You should write at least 250 words.

Get your personalised  IELTS Essay Feedback   from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks ,   get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Sample Essay 1

The notion that banning smoking in public places encroaches upon individual freedom ignites fervent debate. However, prioritizing public health and societal well-being necessitates such measures. This essay advocates for a total prohibition, highlighting its critical role in safeguarding health and cultivating a respectful communal environment.

Primarily, the health implications of passive smoking furnish compelling justification for a blanket ban. Non-smokers, through involuntary inhalation of secondhand smoke, are subjected to similar health risks as active smokers, including an elevated risk of lung cancer, heart disease, and respiratory infections. A study published in the Journal of Public Health delineates how non-smokers exposed to secondhand smoke in public venues exhibit a 25-30% increased risk of heart disease. Implementing a comprehensive ban not only mitigates these health hazards but also underscores a societal commitment to prioritizing well-being over individual liberties in public spaces. This decisive action serves as a public declaration of the importance of health and safety over personal choice in areas shared by the community.

Furthermore, prohibiting smoking in public areas fosters a culture of respect and consideration. Smoke-free environments ensure that public spaces remain accessible and enjoyable for everyone, including children, the elderly, and those with health conditions exacerbated by smoke exposure. This policy also indirectly promotes healthier lifestyle choices by removing the social normalization of smoking, potentially reducing smoking rates overall. Cities like New York and Tokyo, which have enacted such bans, report not only improvements in public health metrics but also a positive shift in public attitudes towards smoking and health consciousness. This transition towards smoke-free spaces reflects a growing societal preference for public health and the collective well-being of all citizens, enhancing the quality of life in urban environments.

In conclusion, the benefits of banning smoking in all public places far outweigh the perceived infringement on personal freedom. By protecting the health of the populace and promoting a culture of mutual respect, such measures prove indispensable. The arguments presented underscore the necessity of prioritizing collective well-being and environmental respect, affirming the stance that a comprehensive smoking ban is both justified and beneficial.

Sample Essay 2

The debate surrounding the prohibition of smoking in public arenas often juxtaposes individual freedom against collective health benefits. This essay contends that the ban is essential, emphasizing its pivotal role in enhancing public health and fostering social etiquette. We will explore the critical importance of public health preservation and the promotion of courteous public behavior.

Firstly, public health is significantly compromised by the pernicious effects of secondhand smoke, which contains over 7,000 chemicals, hundreds of which are toxic and about 70 that can cause cancer. Research indicates that exposure to secondhand smoke is not merely a nuisance but a serious public health hazard, linked to an increase in the incidence of heart disease, stroke, and asthma attacks among bystanders. The imposition of a smoking ban in public places can serve as a deterrent against these health risks, acting as a preventive measure that benefits the broader population, including vulnerable groups such as children and the elderly, who are disproportionately affected by air quality.

Secondly, the introduction of smoking bans in public spaces fosters an environment of respect and civility. It ensures that public spaces are inclusive, safe, and welcoming to all, regardless of one's sensitivity or aversion to smoke. Such policies inadvertently encourage smokers to reconsider their habits, potentially leading to a decrease in smoking prevalence. The success stories of smoke-free zones in major cities across the globe underscore the positive impact of such bans on community health standards and social norms, signaling a shift towards more health-conscious and inclusive public environments.

In conclusion, the argument for banning smoking in public places extends beyond the dichotomy of individual freedom versus collective health. It is a testament to our societal evolution towards prioritizing health, respect, and inclusivity in shared spaces. This stance is not only beneficial for public health but also cultivates a culture of consideration and mutual respect, underscoring the collective responsibility we hold towards each other's well-being.

Sample Essay 3

Despite the known risks and dangers of smoking, it continues to persist in society. While some people argue that smoking bans infringe on personal freedom, I strongly agree that smoking should be prohibited in all public places due to its negative impact on both health and the environment.

To commence with, smoking exerts an extremely harmful influence on human health, posing a serious threat to the lungs and causing various types of cancer, as well as reducing the quality of life. The World Health Organization (WHO) has reported that the use of tobacco results in the premature deaths of a staggering 8 million people each year. This is due to the profound impact that smoking has on public health, causing a range of illnesses that can ultimately lead to early death. Not only does smoking cause damage to the smoker's health, but it also affects those around them, as second-hand smoke is equally as harmful. Additionally, smoking decreases the overall quality of life for both smokers and non-smokers alike, with smokers experiencing reduced lung function, which can make it difficult for them to engage in physical activities or enjoy daily life.

Moreover, smoking does not solely affect human health, but it also has adverse effects on the environment. Smoking releases numerous dangerous chemicals, such as carbon dioxide (CO2), which increases the greenhouse effect and contributes to climate change. This, in turn, can cause global temperatures to rise, leading to significant harm to ecosystems and causing the extinction of many species as their habitats are destroyed. Furthermore, cigarette ashes can combine with other particles in the air to form particulate matter, which is a type of air pollution that can be almost impossible to reverse.

In conclusion, the preceding arguments demonstrate the destructive impact of smoking on the environment and human health. Therefore, tobacco should be considered a hazardous substance to both individuals and the planet, and strict actions should be taken to forbid active or passive inhalation of tobacco in public facilities.

Sample Essay 4

Smoking is a contentious issue that has been debated for decades, and while some individuals believe that it is their right to smoke in public places, others argue that it infringes on the rights of non-smokers. This essay will argue that smoking should be banned in all public places as it not only causes harm to the smoker but also poses a significant health risk to non-smokers.

Firstly, smoking is a well-known cause of various diseases such as lung cancer, heart disease, and respiratory problems. This is because cigarettes contain harmful chemicals such as tar and nicotine, which when inhaled, can lead to serious health complications. In public places, individuals who do not smoke are also at risk of inhaling second-hand smoke, which has been proven to be just as harmful as smoking itself. This not only violates their right to clean air but also puts their health at risk.

Secondly, smoking in public places can also contribute to environmental pollution. Cigarette butts are often discarded carelessly, and they can take years to degrade, polluting the environment and harming wildlife. This is an unacceptable behaviour that infringes on the rights of others to enjoy a clean and healthy environment. Moreover, smoking in public places can be a nuisance to others. The smell of cigarette smoke can be unpleasant and irritating, making it difficult for non-smokers to enjoy their surroundings. In addition, smoking in public places such as parks, beaches, and playgrounds can be harmful to children who are more vulnerable to the effects of second-hand smoke.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that smoking should be banned in all public areas to protect people's health and reduce the negative impact of passive smoking on non-smokers. The ban on smoking in public areas can reduce health hazards, environmental pollution, and protect individual freedom, making it a beneficial decision for the overall welfare of society.

Get your personalised   IELTS Essay Feedback   from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks ,  get everything you need to achieve a high band score

• Task 2 Essays

Recent Posts

Nowadays More People Get Married to Someone of a Different Culture Than They Ever Did - IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay

A New Language Should Be Introduced for All Countries for International Communication - IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay

Nowadays Children Are Undisciplined Because Their Parents Are Busy With Their Careers - IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay

• IELTS Scores
• Life Skills Test
• Find a Test Centre
• Alternatives to IELTS
• All Lessons
• General Training
• IELTS Tests
• Academic Word List
• Topic Vocabulary
• Collocation
• Phrasal Verbs
• Writing eBooks
• Reading eBook
• All eBooks & Courses
• Sample Essays
• Ban Smoking Essay

Ban Smoking in Public Places Essay

This is a  ban smoking in public places  essay. It is an example of an essay where you have to give your opinion as to whether you agree or disagree.

The sample answer shows you how you can present the opposing argument first, that is not your opinion, and then present your opinion in the following paragraph.

It is always a good idea to present a balanced essay which presents both sides of the argument, but you must always make it very clear what your opinion is and which side of the argument you support.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Write at least 250 words.

Model Answer:

Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. As a result of this, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action.

Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. Firstly, they say that passive smokers make the choice to breathe in other people’s smoke by going to places where it is allowed. If they would prefer not to smoke passively, then they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted. In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where they wish.

However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban. First and foremost, it has been proven that tobacco consists of carcinogenic compounds which cause serious harm to a person’s health, not only the smoker. Anyone around them can develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sites in the body. It is simply not fair to impose this upon another person. It is also the case that people’s health is more important than businesses. In any case, pubs and restaurants could adapt to a ban by, for example, allowing smoking areas.

In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public places. This would improve the health of thousands of people, and that is most definitely a positive development.

(290 words)

This essay is well organized and presented.

The introduction is clear - note how it follows the ban smoking in public places essay question - it paraphrases the information in order to introduce the topic and the argument.

The argument against a ban on smoking in public places is presented first. It is made clear that it is not the authors opinion by the topic sentence:

• "Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons".

And also by the use of the word 'they' to refer to the opponents.

The writer then clearly shows they are moving on to the other argument which is their own (and it has clearly been stated in the thesis that this is their argument):

• "However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban".

In this paragraph, 'they' is dropped because it is now the writers opinion.

<<< Back

Next >>>

More Agree / Disagree Essays:

Extinction of Animals Essay: Should we prevent this from happening?

In this extinction of animals essay for IELTS you have to decide whether you think humans should do what they can to prevent the extinction of animal species.

Dying Languages Essay: Is a world with fewer languages a good thing?

Dying languages essays have appeared in IELTS on several occasions, an issue related to the spread of globalisation. Check out a sample question and model answer.

IELTS Vegetarianism Essay: Should we all be vegetarian to be healthy?

Vegetarianism Essay for IELTS: In this vegetarianism essay, the candidate disagrees with the statement, and is thus arguing that everyone does not need to be a vegetarian.

Internet vs Newspaper Essay: Which will be the best source of news?

A recent topic to write about in the IELTS exam was an Internet vs Newspaper Essay. The question was: Although more and more people read news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Free University Education Essay: Should it be paid for or free?

Free university education Model IELTS essay. Learn how to write high-scoring IELTS essays. The issue of free university education is an essay topic that comes up in the IELTS test. This essay therefore provides you with some of the key arguments about this topic.

Essay for IELTS: Are some advertising methods unethical?

This is an agree / disagree type question. Your options are: 1. Agree 100% 2. Disagree 100% 3. Partly agree. In the answer below, the writer agrees 100% with the opinion. There is an analysis of the answer.

Airline Tax Essay: Would taxing air travel reduce pollution?

Airline Tax Essay for IELTS. Practice an agree and disagree essay on the topic of taxing airlines to reduce low-cost air traffic. You are asked to decide if you agree or disagree with taxing airlines in order to reduce the problems caused.

Examinations Essay: Formal Examinations or Continual Assessment?

Examinations Essay: This IELTS model essay deals with the issue of whether it is better to have formal examinations to assess student’s performance or continual assessment during term time such as course work and projects.

Scientific Research Essay: Who should be responsible for its funding?

Scientific research essay model answer for Task 2 of the test. For this essay, you need to discuss whether the funding and controlling of scientific research should be the responsibility of the government or private organizations.

Return of Historical Objects and Artefacts Essay

This essay discusses the topic of returning historical objects and artefacts to their country of origin. It's an agree/disagree type IELTS question.

Technology Development Essay: Are earlier developments the best?

This technology development essay shows you a complex IELTS essay question that is easily misunderstood. There are tips on how to approach IELTS essay questions

Human Cloning Essay: Should we be scared of cloning humans?

Human cloning essay - this is on the topic of cloning humans to use their body parts. You are asked if you agree with human cloning to use their body parts, and what reservations (concerns) you have.

Sample IELTS Writing: Is spending on the Arts a waste of money?

Sample IELTS Writing: A common topic in IELTS is whether you think it is a good idea for government money to be spent on the arts. i.e. the visual arts, literary and the performing arts, or whether it should be spent elsewhere, usually on other public services.

Multinational Organisations and Culture Essay

Multinational Organisations and Culture Essay: Improve you score for IELTS Essay writing by studying model essays. This Essay is about the extent to which working for a multinational organisation help you to understand other cultures.

IELTS Sample Essay: Is alternative medicine ineffective & dangerous?

IELTS sample essay about alternative and conventional medicine - this shows you how to present a well-balanced argument. When you are asked whether you agree (or disagree), you can look at both sides of the argument if you want.

Paying Taxes Essay: Should people keep all the money they earn?

Paying Taxes Essay: Read model essays to help you improve your IELTS Writing Score for Task 2. In this essay you have to decide whether you agree or disagree with the opinion that everyone should be able to keep their money rather than paying money to the government.

Role of Schools Essay: How should schools help children develop?

This role of schools essay for IELTS is an agree disagree type essay where you have to discuss how schools should help children to develop.

Employing Older People Essay: Is the modern workplace suitable?

Employing Older People Essay. Examine model essays for IELTS Task 2 to improve your score. This essay tackles the issue of whether it it better for employers to hire younger staff rather than those who are older.

IELTS Internet Essay: Is the internet damaging social interaction?

Internet Essay for IELTS on the topic of the Internet and social interaction. Included is a model answer. The IELTS test usually focuses on topical issues. You have to discuss if you think that the Internet is damaging social interaction.

Truthfulness in Relationships Essay: How important is it?

This truthfulness in relationships essay for IELTS is an agree / disagree type essay. You need to decide if it's the most important factor.

Any comments or questions about this page or about IELTS? Post them here. Your email will not be published or shared.

Band 7+ eBooks

"I think these eBooks are FANTASTIC!!! I know that's not academic language, but it's the truth!"

Linda, from Italy, Scored Band 7.5

Bargain eBook Deal! 30% Discount

All 4 Writing eBooks for just  $25.86 Find out more >>

IELTS Modules:

Other resources:.

• Band Score Calculator
• Writing Feedback
• Speaking Feedback
• Teacher Resources
• Free Downloads
• Recent Essay Exam Questions
• Books for IELTS Prep
• Useful Links

Recent Articles

Improve Coherence and Cohesion in IELTS Writing

Oct 27, 24 07:24 AM

Lesson on Writing IELTS Line Graphs

Oct 15, 24 02:26 AM

Time Management Tips for IELTS

Oct 06, 24 12:59 PM

Important pages

IELTS Writing IELTS Speaking IELTS Listening   IELTS Reading All Lessons Vocabulary Academic Task 1 Academic Task 2 Practice Tests

Connect with us

Before you go...

30% discount - just $25.86 for all 4 writing ebooks.

Copyright © 2022- IELTSbuddy All Rights Reserved

IELTS is a registered trademark of University of Cambridge, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia.