Global Poverty and the Right to Development in International Law
Posted: 29 May 2013
Patrick Macklem
University of Toronto - Faculty of Law
Date Written: April 22, 2013
This Article advances an account of the right to development as a legal instrument that holds the international legal order accountable for its role in the production and reproduction of global poverty. It first distinguishes moral conceptions of human rights, as instruments that protect universal features of humanity, from legal conceptions, which tie their existence to their specification in international instruments promulgated in compliance with international legal norms governing the creation of legal rights and obligations. Despite textual ambiguities in the various instruments in which it finds expression, the right to development vests in individuals and communities who have yet to benefit from development. It imposes internal obligations on states in which they live to address conditions that contribute to their plight. The right also imposes external obligations on international legal actors, including developed states and international organizations, to assist developing states in poverty reduction. The right’s external obligations are negative and positive in nature. Its negative dimensions require states and international institutions to fashion rules and policies governing the global economy in ways that do not exacerbate global poverty. Its positive dimensions require states and international institutions to provide assistance to developing states in the form of development aid and debt relief. Both drawing on and departing from debates about global justice in contemporary political theory, it justifies these obligations by linking the purpose of the right to development to international law’s engagement with colonialism and economic globalization.
Keywords: right to development, international human rights law, global justice, global poverty, international economic law, colonialism
JEL Classification: F02
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Patrick Macklem (Contact Author)
University of toronto - faculty of law ( email ).
78 and 84 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5 Canada 416-978-3873 (Phone) 416-978-7899 (Fax)
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Paper statistics, related ejournals, jurisprudence & legal philosophy ejournal.
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
Public International Law: Human Rights eJournal
Law & society: international & comparative law ejournal, human rights & the global economy ejournal, economic inequality & the law ejournal, law & society: public law - poverty ejournal, international political economy: globalization ejournal, comparative political economy: comparative capitalism ejournal, political economy - development: international development efforts & strategies ejournal, poverty research ejournal.
Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic
Human Rights eJournal
- DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3431560
- Corpus ID: 202314455
Jurisprudence of Law, Poverty and Development
- Suman Acharya
- Published in Social Science Research… 3 August 2019
Related Papers
Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
As peace and development are interrelated; ultimate purpose of jurisprudence is to establish peace, justice, equality and rule of law in society. Finally, UN has coined Sustainable Development Goals to eradicate all form of poverty across the globe by 2030 AD.
UNESCO's Comparative Research Programme on Poverty (CROP) is an attempt to fill this gap. The editors have put together thirteen articles, which explore the role of law in poverty alleviation from different cross-sectoral and cross-country perspectives. The book is divided into four parts: the legal construction of
Using thematic analysis, this study found that poverty alleviation programs are implemented in urban and rural areas and through women's empowerment. In addition, social, economic, and environmental benefits are determinant factors of the implications of poverty alleviation programs.
By pioneering an approach to empirical research for providing such answers, the 2019 Laureates ― Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo and Michael Kremer ― have transformed development economics. Their approach remained guided by microeconomic theory and the use of microeconomic data.
From there this work presents the commons alternative, a turning away from the logic of domination and consumption, and a repatriation of the law to sovereign communities and the conditions under which a new and legitimate people’s international law can emerge.
Abstract. Does International Law have anything to offer to the 'poorest of the poor'? The short answer to this question is: yes, potentially. So far, however, it has offered very little.
This Article advances an account of the right to development as a legal instrument that holds the international legal order accountable for its role in the production and reproduction of global poverty.
The purpose of this article is to analyse the role of human rights (specifically the Bill of Rights in the Constitution) and government efforts to alleviate poverty (through certain programmes and service delivery) in the face of adverse socio-economic realities in South Africa.
As peace and development are interrelated; ultimate purpose of jurisprudence is to establish peace, justice, equality and rule of law in society. Finally, UN has coined Sustainable Development Goals to eradicate all form of poverty across the globe by 2030 AD.
This Article attempts to fill this gap by presenting a general theory that defines the disciplinary parameters of law and development, and explains the mechanisms by which law impacts development.