essay on evolution of vertebrates

• school Campus Bookshelves
• menu_book Bookshelves
• perm_media Learning Objects
• login Login
• how_to_reg Request Instructor Account
• hub Instructor Commons
• Download Page (PDF)
• Download Full Book (PDF)
• Periodic Table
• Physics Constants
• Scientific Calculator
• Reference & Cite
• Tools expand_more
• Readability

selected template will load here

This action is not available.

12.7: Vertebrate Evolution

• Last updated
• Save as PDF
• Page ID 6708

What type of fish is a simple perch?

Does it have a partial of complete vertebral column? What about a jaw? Do you think the endoskeleton is made of cartilage or bone? Why are these important evolutionary steps? A bony skeletal could support a larger body. Early bony fish evolved into modern ray-finned and lobe-finned fish, which then evolved into species that could move out of the water .

Vertebrate Evolution

The earliest vertebrates were jawless fish, similar to living hagfish. They lived between 500 and 600 million years ago. They had a cranium but no vertebral column. The phylogenetic tree in Figure below gives an overview of vertebrate evolution. As more data become available, new ideas about vertebrate evolution emerge.

Phylogenetic Tree of Vertebrate Evolution. The earliest vertebrates evolved almost 550 million years ago. Which class of vertebrates evolved last?

Evolution of Fish

Not too long after hagfish first appeared, fish similar to lampreys evolved a partial vertebral column. The first fish with a complete vertebral column evolved about 450 million years ago. These fish also had jaws and may have been similar to living sharks. Up to this point, all early vertebrates had an endoskeleton made of cartilage rather than bone. About 400 million years ago, the first bony fish appeared. A bony skeleton could support a larger body. Early bony fish evolved into modern ray-finned and lobe-finned fish.

Evolution of Other Vertebrate Classes

Amphibians, reptiles, mammals, and birds evolved after fish.

• The first amphibians evolved from a lobe-finned fish ancestor about 365 million years ago. They were the first vertebrates to live on land, but they had to return to water to reproduce. This meant they had to live near bodies of water.
• The first reptiles evolved from an amphibian ancestor at least 300 million years ago. They laid amniotic eggs and had internal fertilization. They were the first vertebrates that no longer had to return to water to reproduce. They could live just about anywhere.
• Mammals and birds both evolved from reptile-like ancestors. The first mammals appeared about 200 million years ago and the earliest birds about 150 million years ago.

Evolution of Endothermy

Until mammals and birds evolved, all vertebrates were ectothermic. Ectothermy means regulating body temperature from the outside through behavioral changes. For example, an ectotherm might stay under a rock in the shade in order to keep cool on a hot, sunny day. Almost all living fish, amphibians, and reptiles are ectothermic. Their metabolic rate and level of activity depend mainly on the outside temperature. They can raise or lower their own temperature only slightly through behavior alone.

Both mammals and birds evolved endothermy. Endothermy means regulating bodytemperature from the inside through metabolic or other physical changes. On a cold day, for example, an endotherm may produce more heat by raising its metabolic rate. On a hot day, it may give off more heat by increasing blood flow to the surface of the body. Keeping body temperature stable allows cells to function at peak efficiency at all times. The metabolic rate and activity level can also remain high regardless of the outside temperature. On the other hand, maintaining a stable body temperature requires more energy—and more food.

• The earliest vertebrates resembled hagfish and lived more than 500 million years ago.
• As other classes of fish appeared, they evolved traits such as a complete vertebral column, jaws, and a bony endoskeleton.
• Amphibians were the first tetrapod vertebrates as well as the first vertebrates to live on land.
• Reptiles were the first amniotic vertebrates.
• Mammals and birds, which both descended from reptile-like ancestors, evolved endothermy, or the ability to regulate body temperature from the inside.
• In what order did vertebrates evolve?
• Birds evolved from what other type of vertebrate?
• What were the first vertebrates to lay amniotic eggs?
• Compare and contrast ectothermy and endothermy, including their pros and cons.

Volume 1 Supplement 4

Special Issue: The Evolution of Eyes

• Original Scientific Article
• Open access
• Published: 18 October 2008

Early Evolution of the Vertebrate Eye—Fossil Evidence

• Gavin C. Young 1  

Evolution: Education and Outreach volume  1 ,  pages 427–438 ( 2008 ) Cite this article

11k Accesses

11 Citations

37 Altmetric

Metrics details

Evidence of detailed brain morphology is illustrated and described for 400-million-year-old fossil skulls and braincases of early vertebrates (placoderm fishes). Their significance is summarized in the context of the historical development of knowledge of vertebrate anatomy, both before and since the time of Charles Darwin. These ancient extinct fishes show a unique type of preservation of the cartilaginous braincase and demonstrate a combination of characters unknown in other vertebrate species, living or extinct. The structure of the oldest detailed fossil evidence for the vertebrate eye and brain indicates a legacy from an ancestral segmented animal, in which the braincase is still partly subdivided, and the arrangement of nerves and muscles controlling eye movement was intermediate between the living jawless and jawed vertebrate groups. With their unique structure, these placoderms fill a gap in vertebrate morphology and also in the vertebrate fossil record. Like many other vertebrate fossils elucidated since Darwin’s time, they are key examples of the transitional forms that he predicted, showing combinations of characters that have never been observed together in living species.

Introduction

The vertebrate eye has been presented time and again as a key example of biological complexity that evolution cannot explain. Proponents of “Intelligent Design” use the eye as an example of “irreducible complexity” and claim to challenge Darwinian evolution with such questions as, “could the human eye be the result of chance”? The same issue, raised by the theologian William Paley in his 1802 book, Natural Theology , was confronted in 1859 by Charles Darwin in The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection . Paley noted that the more spherical lens of a fish eye compared to that of a land vertebrate showed each was adapted to the refractive index of the water or air in which the animal lived. “What plainer evidence than design could there be?” he asked.

Darwin’s response ( 1859 , p. 133) has been widely quoted: “To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances…could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.” Darwin was considering the eye of vertebrate animals generally. Modern supporters of “Intelligent Design,” not necessarily well grounded in comparative anatomy, may believe that the human eye is somehow more perfect than eyes of other vertebrates—but mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fishes all have eyes of similar complexity, as do many “invertebrates” (although on a different structural plan), such as cephalopods (living) and trilobites (extinct).

Darwin recognized that the theory that life had evolved over a vast time also had implications for the fossil record as then known. He devoted one chapter in The Origin of Species to “Imperfection of the Geological Record” and another to the “Geological Succession of Organic Beings”. His problem was the distinctness of living species, used as a major argument against the idea that species could change. If one species could evolve into another, why were they not “blended together by innumerable transitional links” (Darwin 1859 , p. 234)? His proposed solution was a “process of extermination” due to natural selection, that removed an “enormous number” of pre-existing “intermediate varieties.” Why, then, were such transitional forms not readily found in “every geological formation and…stratum”? His explanation was “the extreme imperfection of the geological record.”

Regarding “organs of extreme perfection and complication,” Darwin ( 1859 , p. 133) noted that “gradations through which an organ has been perfected” should be found among the “lineal progenitors” of the species in question, but this is “scarcely possible” (they are all extinct). To understand how a complex organ may have evolved, it was necessary to look at “other species and genera of the same group…collateral descendants from the same parent-form…to see what gradations are possible.” Put another way, because fossilization of such organs was almost inconceivable, the best one could do was examine the corresponding organ in related living species.

The information summarized here is relevant to all of these issues. I describe and illustrate some remarkable fossil preservation concerning the eye and brain of early vertebrates—animals that lived more than 400-million-years-ago (mya), showing details that Charles Darwin could not have imagined possible. To place the understanding of such fossils in context, it is necessary first to briefly summarize the development of knowledge of the vertebrate eye in living species (for explanation of terms in boldface see Glossary of Terms).

Eyes of Living Vertebrates

In 1859, Darwin already could benefit from the efforts of thousands of scientists going back some two millennia. Building on investigations of the Greek physician Herophilus (335–280 BC), the eye muscles of vertebrates were first documented in the Myology treatise of Claudius Galen of Pergamum (130–200 AD), who dissected and named the tunics of the eye, and introduced terms like “retina” and “cornea”. Galen was also the first to describe the cranial nerves correctly (seven of the 12 of modern anatomy ) and demonstrated that nerves originated from the brain and spinal cord, thereby overturning the authority of Aristotle (384–322 BC), who believed that nerves originated in the heart. Studying in Montpellier, the French anatomist Rondelet (1507–1566) first found the cartilaginous eyestalk in a shark (which he mistook for the optic nerve .) The Dutchman Coiter (1534–1576) first described sclerotic bones in the eye of birds, the Belgian Vesalius (1514–1564) found the seventh extraocular muscle in the dog and the ox, and the absence of this muscle in humans was noted by the Italian, Eustachius, (in 1552; confirmed by Fallopius, 1561). Fallopius was also the first to discover the three semicircular canals of the inner ear. Fabricius (1533–1619) recorded only six extraocular muscles in man, ape and fishes, compared to seven in most quadrupeds. The detailed discoveries of these and many other early anatomists (see Cole 1949 ) form the foundations for knowledge of human anatomy expected today of any surgeon.

A new field of comparative embryology , developed mainly after the publication of Darwin’s The Origin of Species , revealed other remarkable facts. The segmented muscle blocks evident in the flesh of any fish were found to extend forward into the head region in early shark embryos (Balfour 1878 ). From these, the development of the standard pattern of vertebrate eye muscles was worked out. Four muscles innervated by the third cranial nerve were derived from the first muscle block, with one muscle developed from the second, and another from the third muscle block, these being innervated by the fourth and sixth cranial nerves respectively.

One hundred fifty years since Darwin, there has been an enormous increase in our knowledge of the comparative anatomy, function and molecular biology of the vertebrate nervous system. For evolutionary biologists, this has provided numerous tests of Darwin’s theory. The “camera and lens” type of eye in vertebrates, also developed in the octopus, is one of at least nine design principles amongst the eyes of different animal groups, and much more has been learnt about the diverse structures used for vision across the animal kingdom (Land and Nilsson 2002 ). The excellent summary presented by Richard Dawkins ( 1996 , pp. 126–179) in Climbing Mount Improbable (Chapter 5 “The Forty-fold Path to Enlightenment”) argues that complex eyes may have evolved at least 40 and perhaps up to 60 times independently in different animal groups (but see Gregory 2008 ). From an initial patch of light-sensitive cells facing in one direction, it is inferred that the elaboration towards true (image-forming) vision would first require an ability to detect the direction from which light was coming. This would be most simply achieved by bending the light-sensitive surface so that the photoreceptor cells receive light from different directions, either inwards to form a cup, or outwards as a convex curve. The first solution would result in the “camera-style” eye such as possessed by modern vertebrates, and the second a “compound eye” such as possessed by modern insects.

By analogy with the lens, film, and light-proof outer casing of a basic camera, the camera eye at its simplest would require three layers of cells with comparable functions: a protective outer layer that was transparent to let light in, a middle layer of light-sensitive cells, and a basal opaque layer to trap the light. In an elegant computer-modeling program, involving simulation of minor modifications to improve optical performance starting from this basic arrangement, and using very conservative estimates of heritability and population variation, Nilsson and Pelger ( 1994 ) showed that to elaborate from a flat light-sensitive patch, through a cup-shaped invagination, to a camera-style eye, complete with graded lens similar to that of a fish, could be achieved in about 364,000 generations. This could have taken place in about 0.5 million years, a minute segment of geological time.

The computer simulation simplified things greatly by considering only one aspect of the complexity of the vertebrate eye. Other major aspects of complexity not taken into account were: (1) the preceding requirement to evolve the initial light-sensitive cells (photoreceptors); (2) the “wiring” of those cells to the control center, i.e. the nervous connections between eye and brain; (3) the mechanisms needed to control eye movement, particularly to fix the gaze on an object whilst the body of the observer is moving; (4) the ability to adjust focus of the lens, either by moving it forwards or backwards (as in fish, amphibians, some reptiles), or by altering its shape (as in some reptiles, and all birds and mammals) and (5) the ability to change the aperture through which light is admitted.

Regarding point 1, molecular genetics now indicates that an ancestral light-sensitive patch may have developed only once, in a very early common ancestor, at least of all bilateral animals, if not earlier. This is based on the remarkable observation that the same or corresponding genetic control over eye development (the Pax6 gene and its equivalents) has been found in groups as disparate as mammals, insects, molluscs and worms (Gehring 2005 ). Regarding points 3 and 4, fossil evidence presented below shows that high-complex mechanisms for eye movement and focus were already evolved some 400 mya.

For those who support “Intelligent Design” and/or reject the notion that life has evolved during some 3.5 billion years of Earth history, all the evidence from living species may be dismissed as irrelevant speculation, because it is derived from the present, whereas Darwinian evolution is concerned with evolutionary change operating over many millions of years in the geological past. To answer such claims, some tangible fossil evidence of fundamental evolutionary change from deep within the history of life on this planet is described in the next section.

Fossil Evidence of Eye Structure in Early Vertebrates

Opponents of Darwinian evolution still rely on the argument of a poor or absent fossil record, but many new discoveries have been made since Darwin’s time, and documentation of the history of past life on our planet has greatly improved. For backboned animals (vertebrates,) this includes some very rare but detailed evidence of the early evolution of that most complex organ, the brain, and its sensory organs, including the eye.

The issue of organ complexity in the fossil record can be a double-edged sword. A “good” fossil record would be a series of fossils from different ages documenting an “evolutionary trend” through geological time, the “lineage….of progenitors” wished for by Darwin. On the other hand, just one highly complex fossil, perhaps completely isolated in time by millions of years, can be of great significance because its complexity carries enormous information content. If “structural complexity,” which we have learnt about through centuries of scientific research into the comparative anatomy of living organisms, can be presented as an argument against Darwinian evolution, then a structurally complex fossil is equally valid evidence for the other side of the argument.

It is commonly thought that the fossil record of the vertebrate brain is limited to general evidence of size and shape derived from the skull cavity of extinct mammals. To quote Richard Dawkins ( The Blind Watchmaker , p. 188): “Brains themselves do not fossilize, but skulls do, and the cavity in which the brain was housed—the braincase—if interpreted with care, can give a good indication of brain size.” Also (Dawkins 1991 , p. 40): “Eyes don’t fossilise, so we don’t know how long our type of eye took to evolve its present complexity and perfection from nothing, but the time available is several hundred million years.” Regarding the computer simulation indicating rapid evolution of a camera-style eye, Dawkins ( 1996 , p. 176) noted that such an evolutionary rate would be geologically instantaneous, so finding fossils recording transitional stages would be a matter of extreme luck. In any case, one would not “expect to be able to see the details of eyes in fossils, because they are too soft to fossilize.” A well-known exception is the diversity of compound eyes (like those of modern insects) documented in extinct trilobites, because the lenses of tiny calcite crystals are hard, and are often preserved as fossils (for a review see Fortey 2000 ).

Otherwise, vertebrate fossils can provide a general idea of eye structure from the size of the orbit (eye socket) in preserved skulls, or from the size of the “sclerotic ring,” a circle of bones that may develop on the outer surface of the eyeball to help maintain its spherical shape, particularly when it is relatively large (among living groups this structure occurs in various birds, reptiles and fishes.) The sclerotic ring, when preserved in fossils, gives a general idea of overall size of the eyeball, for example in ichthyosaurs, a group of Mesozoic marine reptiles that seem to have had large eyeballs for the low light conditions associated with deep diving (Motani et al. 1999 ).

However, the type of fossil preservation discussed in this article is largely unmentioned in general textbooks or more popular books on evolution. This concerns some surprising detail on the early evolutionary history of the vertebrate central nervous system and major sense organs. Of course, we would not expect the preservation of ancient structures made entirely of soft tissues (e.g. rods and cone cells in the retina; the billions of neurons, nerve tracts and grey and white matter within the brain). Furthermore, vision is a “process,” not observable in fossils, in which the function of preserved parts can only be inferred by comparison with presumed equivalents in their living relatives, where functions can be observed.

It is obvious that the best fossil record is provided by groups with a mineralized skeleton; but, in rare instances, soft-bodied organisms can be preserved, for example in the famous Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale fauna of Canada or the more recently discovered Early Cambrian Chengjiang fauna of China (Shu et al. 1999 ). A variety of forms in the Chengjiang fauna had eyes, and these include two forms, Haikouichthys and Myllokunmingia , interpreted as stem vertebrates (there is disagreement about whether one or more types may be present, the morphological differences alternatively explained as due to different preservation.)

The vertebrate affinities of these small elongate animals is indicated by the following preserved features (Janvier 2003 ): a head, a distinct branchial region with six filamentous gills, chevron-shaped myomeres (muscle blocks) along the body, and possible cartilaginous elements perhaps supporting the branchial apparatus surrounding the anterior part of an axial skeleton (notochord). Shu et al. ( 2003 ) reported many new examples of the form called Haikouichthys , including some that are dorsoventrally compressed, showing the structure of the 1–2-mm-sized head from above. Small paired openings near the midline at the front probably connect to the olfactory organs (nas. op, Fig.  1 a), behind which are large paired eyes and posterior paired structures (possible otic capsules) surrounded by a smooth area indicating some type of fibrous or cartilaginous braincase (Janvier 2003 ). Thus, it is probable that these animals already possessed all three senses (olfactory, optic and otic regions of the brain), although more details of the major sense organs are unknown at present.

a Interpretation of the head in dorsal view of the Early Cambrian stem vertebrate Haikouichthys from the Chengjiang fauna of Yunnan Province, China, showing the presumed cartilaginous braincase (stippled) at the anterior end of the notochord. The braincase evidently included the three major sense organs of vertebrates: paired nasal openings ( nas.op ), paired eyes, and probably an acoustico-lateral line system suggested by paired otic capsules ( otic caps .). b Dorsal view of an incomplete headshield of the arandaspid agnathan Sacabambaspis from the Ordovician of Bolivia, showing the unique paired pineal openings ( pi ), sensory grooves ( sg ) of the lateral line system, and an anterior orbitonasal opening ( ono ). This housed both eye capsules, with the nasal openings separated by an internasal bone ( inb ). c Sacabambaspis (Ordovician, Bolivia); reconstruction of the whole fish in left dorsolateral view, showing the position of the eyes, paired pineal openings ( pi ), sensory groove system ( sg ), and branchial openings ( br.op ). a modified from Janvier ( 2003 , Fig.  2 c); b , c modified from Gagnier ( 1995 , Figs.  3 and 4 )

Following this is a gap in the vertebrate fossil record of some 30 million years, before the first mineralized skeleton developed. Hard tissue (skeletal) fragments assigned to early vertebrates have been found in Late Cambrian strata (e.g. Young et al. 1996 ), but it is only in the Early–Middle Ordovician that we have good evidence of the early armoured agnathans (jawless vertebrates). At their first appearance, they are represented by two major Ordovician groups: the Arandaspidida from Australia and South America, and the Astraspidida from North America. These are allied to the Heterostraci of the Silurian and Devonian periods, by which time several other major armoured agnathan groups (osteostracans, galeaspids, pituriaspids) are well documented by numerous fossils, revealing a detailed morphology (summarized in Janvier 1996 , pp. 85–123).

The appearance of a hard skeleton within the vertebrates was a major evolutionary advance, and to describe some of the stages through which the skeleton evolved, it is necessary first to understand that the apparently unified single system of bones in a living mammal is in fact derived from two separate systems. These were originally quite distinct in early vertebrates. An external or dermal skeleton can only form in the skin (in a mammal exemplified by the bones on the top of the human skull,) while the internal, or endoskeleton , comprises elements first formed as cartilage, that later ossify (e.g. the backbone). Components of both skeletal systems may be preserved as fossils, and it is important to distinguish between them.

The well-developed dermal skeleton enclosing the head of the Ordovician arandaspid Sacabambaspis from Bolivia shows a unique condition of the pineal body or ‘third eye’ at the top of the brain (pi, Fig.  1 b,c)—there are paired (pineal and para-pineal) openings, whereas in other early vertebrates with a pineal opening, it is always a single foramen through the top of the skull. Sacabambaspis had small anteriorly placed eyes (Fig.  1 c), at least partly enclosed by an endoskeletal capsule, and perhaps with an outer (exoskeletal) “sclerotic ring,” also seen in the small lateral eyes of the Ordovician Astraspis from North America. Small lateral eyes were also characteristic of the Heterostraci (Early Silurian–Late Devonian); these had no internal (endoskeletal) ossification, but impressions suggest a semi-conical eyeball (Janvier 1996 , p. 94). Another group (anaspids) had larger lateral eyes surrounded externally by a non-sclerotic dermal cover and possibly an accommodation device (corneal muscle) similar to the living jawless lamprey (Janvier 1996 , p. 103).

The heavily armoured Osteostraci are the first group to give detailed evidence of eye morphology, with a true sclerotic ring, and the braincase and internal sclerotic cartilage preserved as perichondral ossifications (discussed further below). The braincase internal structure shows that the inner ear comprised only two semicircular canals, compared to three in all the jawed vertebrates ( gnathostomes ). The eye sockets ( orbits ) of osteostracans display distinct muscle depressions called myodomes, which demonstrate the presence of extraocular muscles for moving the eyeball (Janvier 1975 ).

How can we work out the detailed morphology of cranial nerves, and arteries and veins connected to the brain, in fossil groups that are entirely extinct? Furthermore, how can we interpret fossil evidence to permit a reconstruction of the “soft” tissues of the eyeball, as illustrated in Fig.  2 ? This unique and exquisitely preserved Australian fossil is a 400-million-year-old complete eye capsule from an armoured ( placoderm ) fish. These were the dominant jawed vertebrate group during the Devonian Period (415–360 mya) and are presumed to be the sister group to all the other jawed vertebrates (Goujet and Young 2004 ). It was noted above that the vertebrate skeleton comprises two separate and quite distinct systems in early vertebrates. The beautifully sculptured surface surrounding the eye opening in Fig.  2 a is made up of five fused bones of the sclerotic ring, part of the external or dermal skeleton , with the sculptured ornament being the same as on the skull bones of that fish.

Perfectly preserved 400-million-year-old left eye capsule of a placoderm fish, acid-etched from Lower Devonian limestones of the Burrinjuck area, New South Wales, Australia ( Murrindalaspis , first described by Long and Young 1988 ). a External view showing the dermal sclerotic ring; b XCT scan revealing the inside of the eye opening, to show structures on the retinal wall (CT scanning and imaging by Prof. T. Senden and Dr A. Limaye, ANU); c internal view of the sclerotic cartilage enclosing the eyeball, showing scars for eye muscle attachment, the eyestalk attachment and openings for the optic nerve, and arteries and veins supplying the eyeball

The inner or sclerotic coating at the back of the retina in the modern eyeball (equivalent to the “white” of the human eye) may be a cup of cartilage, and is part of the endoskeleton . The “white” of the eye is a fibrous layer in mammals, but the original cartilage cup formed in the embryo as an outgrowth of the cartilaginous braincase. In most modern cartilaginous fishes (sharks and rays), the eyeball is still connected to the braincase by a cartilaginous eyestalk .

Cartilage is soft and flexible compared to bone, and it readily rots away. It is very rarely preserved in fossils and, unlike bone, would not be expected to survive for 400 million years. However, an obscure development in some of the earliest vertebrates possessing a mineralized skeleton, such as the osteostracan agnathans mentioned above, and the jawed placoderm fishes, provides the key to the preservation of cartilaginous structures.

The growing outer surface of any cartilage is a thin layer of dense cells called the “perichondrium.” For some reason, in the early placoderms, this was the only part of the internal skeleton that could ossify . The unornamented inner side of the placoderm eye capsule (Fig.  2 c) is actually two paper-thin layers of perichondral bone, enclosing a space originally filled with cartilage. It is completely joined to the outer sclerotic ring, such that the preserved structure surrounded or “encapsulated” the eyeball; hence, the term “eye capsule” for this unit, even though it is made up of two components of different origin.

Because it is an enclosing capsule, every nerve or blood vessel entering or leaving the eye is preserved as a distinct openings through both perichondral layers. The unornamented inner half of the eye capsule, which fitted into the orbit (eye socket) of the skull, shows depressions and ridges for attachment of the extraocular muscles (Fig.  2 c). Inside the capsule are small processes just inside the eye opening, which presumably helped support the lens of the eye. Such detail is completely preserved and is incontrovertible evidence that most complexities of the vertebrate eye had already evolved by 400 mya. On the other hand, there are also some significant differences from the eyes of living vertebrates, for example in the arrangement of the extraocular muscles that moved the eyeball in its socket, as outlined below. Thus, it cannot be claimed that this complex fossil is no different from the corresponding structure in modern animals and, therefore, shows that evolutionary change has not occurred, another spurious argument used by some “creationists.”

To recognise a single eye capsule such as this in isolation, let alone to interpret its complexity in a meaningful way, would be extremely difficult without a wealth of supporting information about the brain of these early vertebrates. Nearly 90 years ago, a Swedish researcher, Erik Stensiö, was the first to notice thin dark lines (the same perichondral bone layers) in the rock matrix inside a fossilized placoderm fish skull. His detailed interpretations of the internal structure of the braincase in this and other early vertebrates (e.g. Stensiö 1925 , 1927 ) caused some amazement and suspicion that it could not be possible to extract such information from fossils that old (see Janvier 1996 , p. 315).

Stensiö later applied the technique of serial grinding to great effect, even if the fossil (and any chance of checking interpretations) was destroyed in the process. Successive layers were ground away until nothing was left, but cross-sectional drawings or photographs were prepared at each stage and used to reconstruct brain structure in three-dimensional wax models as a basis for comparisons of brain structure in a range of early vertebrate groups (see Stensiö 1963 ). Detailed mechanical preparation of similar material (e.g. Goujet 1984 ; Janvier 1985 ) substantiated many of Stensiö’s interpretations, but some significant points required amendment.

About 60 years ago, a major advance in techniques of fossil extraction exploited the different chemical reaction of bone (calcium phosphate) embedded in limestone rock (calcium carbonate) when immersed in acetic acid. Acid extraction was perfected in the 1940s in London using Australian fossil specimens from the same area as the material illustrated here. As the acid etched away the rock, the British researchers were amazed to see structures of the braincase emerging in the form of thin perichondral bone layers. The first scientific research based on this new fossil preparation technique was published by White ( 1952 ). The technique is now used in palaeontological laboratories throughout the world, to extract vertebrate bone from calcareous rocks.

Specimens partly eroded by weathering when found (e.g. Fig.  3 a) can be acid-etched to reveal the internal braincase cavities and canals for cranial nerves and blood vessels, all of which were lined with perichondral bone. Most recently, the internal structures have been investigated using X-ray computed tomography (XCT) scanning techniques (Fig.  2 b). The placoderm brain cavity is a long central tube, from which smaller tubes emanate (Fig.  3 b). The walls of the braincase were much thicker than the central brain cavity, so the detailed course of the nerves, arteries, and veins passing to and from the brain can be worked out in great detail. The labyrinth cavity of the inner ear is entirely embedded in the thick braincase wall, so its three semicircular canals with their ampullae , and the sacculus and utriculus , are completely preserved (Fig.  3 a). Each semicircular canal is oriented at 90 degrees to the other two, as an organ of balance to determine position in three-dimensional space. The Burrinjuck fossil fish demonstrate that the basic inner ear structure of jawed vertebrates was fully evolved by 400 mya. In contrast, all jawless vertebrates, both living and extinct, lack the horizontal semicircular canal, suggesting that this structure “co-evolved” when jaws first appeared.

Two skulls of arthrodire placoderms from the Lower Devonian limestones of the Burrinjuck area, New South Wales, Australia. a Skull roof bones have been eroded off from above, to reveal the internal cavities and nerve canals of the braincase, defined by thin layers of perichondral bone ( Buchanosteus , first described by Young 1979 ). b Smaller skull from below, with braincase still attached to dermal skull roof (extracted from limestone with acetic acid). The floor of the braincase and of the central brain cavity are broken. Cranial nerves labelled and/or numbered are the oculomotor nerve (3), acousticus nerve (8), glossopharyngeal nerve (9) and vagus nerve (10). The optic nerve (2) is represented by a groove at the front of the braincase (gr[2]); the hyomandibular branch of the facial nerve (7) is indicated by a large opening (hy[7]). Abbreviations for structures of the inner ear are: aa, ampulla of anterior semicircular canal; hc, horizontal semicircular canal; pa, ampulla of posterior semicircular canal; utric., utriculus

The labyrinth cavity is a complex morphological “landmark,” by which the various canals for cranial nerves can be identified, according to the numbering system of classical anatomy (from the front backwards). Thus, the eighth cranial nerve ( acousticus ) enters the labyrinth cavity, the ninth and tenth nerves ( glossopharyngeus , vagus ) pass under or behind it, and nerves 5–7 ( trigeminus , abducens , facialis ) emanate in front of the labyrinth and behind the orbit. A major (hyomandibular) branch of the seventh nerve has a conspicuous opening (hy[7], Figs.  3 b and 4 b) adjacent to the attachment point for a large gill arch element articulating with the braincase to support the jaws of early gnathostomes. In land vertebrates, this element (the hyomandibula ) loses its supporting function to transmit sound into the braincase, ultimately becoming the stapes of the middle ear in mammals.

a Left side of an eroded braincase of the placoderm fish Brindabellaspis Young, 1980 from Wee Jasper, Burrinjuck area, New South Wales, Australia. The specimen has been acid-etched from limestone to reveal preserved braincase structure in the form of perichondral bone layers (specimen illustrated by Goujet and Young 2004 ). Muscle pockets in the orbit (myodomes) are numbered according to the cranial nerve canals that connected them to the brain cavity (third and fourth cranial nerves). b Left lateral view of the oldest acid-etched braincase of a true bony fish (osteichthyan), also from Wee Jasper, Burrinjuck area (described by Basden and Young 2001 ); hy [7] is the opening for the hyomandibular branch of the facial nerve (7). c Front view of another arthrodire (the same group as in Fig.  3 ). This unique specimen shows the complete skull, braincase, cheek, and jawbones, with both eye capsules and the rostral capsule in place (jaws described by Young et al. 2001 )

The orbit is a second major morphological landmark. Nerves 2–4 ( optic , oculomotor and trochlear ) enter the orbit, and nerve 1 ( olfactory nerve ) passes forward into the nasal capsules. The openings within the eye socket (e.g. for the optic nerve, the largest of the cranial nerves; Fig.  4 a,b) closely match those on the back of the eye capsule (Fig.  2 c). The vertebrate eyeball is movable inside the orbit, its precise position controlled by six tiny extraocular muscles, with a consistent innervation and developmental pattern determined by comparative embryology of the segmented muscle blocks in the head region of early shark embryos, as mentioned above. The extraocular muscles must form antagonistic muscle pairs (one pulling forward and another backward in each of three dimensions; muscles cannot push). Thus, the basic number of extraocular muscles is six for jawed vertebrates; that is, twice the number of semicircular canals in the inner ear. Attachment scars for these muscles are seen on the inner side of the eye capsule (Fig.  2 c), and they originate on the braincase within the eye socket, in specific muscle pockets called myodomes (Fig.  4 a), each connected by a short nerve canal to the brain cavity. The relative position of these nerve canals enables their contained cranial nerves to be determined.

The detailed interpretation of this ancient eye muscle pattern and innervation draws heavily on classical anatomy and embryology of living species. The general pattern for all gnathostome (jawed) fishes comprises four rectus muscles attached to the posterior wall of the orbit and inserting around the rim of the eyeball, and two opposing oblique muscles (superior and inferior) that extend back from the anterior orbital wall to insert dorsally and ventrally on the rim of the eyeball (Young 2008 ). The consistent position and innervation (one muscle each innervated by cranial nerves 4 and 6, the remaining four innervated by the oculomotor nerve 3) indicates that this is a highly conserved and presumably ancient system among the vertebrates. As stated by Neal ( 1918 , p. 433), the extraocular muscles “appear in the lower vertebrates in essentially the same form as in man. Indeed, their number and their nerve relations are the same in man as in the dogfish…only the superior oblique shows a function change in the course of phylogeny.” The “function change” refers to the living lamprey, in which the muscle corresponding to the gnathostome “superior oblique” (based on the same innervation by cranial nerve 4, the trochlearis) has a posterior rather than anterior attachment and insertion on the eyeball.

Remarkably, the 400-million-year-old extinct placoderm fish from Burrinjuck shows the same posterior attachment for the superior oblique eye muscle as in the modern agnathan , the lamprey (Young 1986 ). Together with the presence of jaws in placoderms, this represents a unique character combination, unknown in any other jawed vertebrate—all other vertebrates with jaws, both living and extinct, have the corresponding muscle attached on the front of the orbit. In addition, the placoderm eyeball was supported by a strong cartilaginous eyestalk (Fig.  4 a), as in modern sharks. The eyestalk attachment now seems to represent the ancestral condition for all jawed vertebrates because it has recently been identified as well in a true bony fish specimen from Burrinjuck (Fig.  4 b), representing the oldest acid-extracted osteichthyan braincase (Basden et al. 2000 ). The everted rim of the largest opening in the orbital wall, also evident in the placoderm braincase (eyestalk, Fig.  4 a,b), demonstrates that this was cartilage-filled, and could not have contained a nerve or vessel. The smaller round opening in front has inturned margins continuing into the central brain cavity as a nerve canal; this is the canal for cranial nerve 2, the optic nerve (Fig.  4 b). In modern teleosts (ray-finned fish), the most diverse living vertebrate group, and the living descendants of this ancient osteichthyan, the cartilage connection between eyeball and braincase has been lost, but the unique specimen of Fig.  4 b indicates that the connection must have been a primitive feature, at least for all jawed vertebrates.

Another unique condition of placoderm fishes is a subdivision of the braincase into two separate ossifications at the level of the optic nerve. Thus, the anterior part of the braincase (rostral capsule, Fig.  4 c) generally falls away, leaving half of the optic nerve canal as a deep groove at the front of the posterior part (gr[2], Fig.  3 b). Interpretation of this groove as having contained the optic nerve has been confirmed by a single complex fossil, a complete skull and braincase with both eye capsules and the rostral capsule in place, showing this “optic fissure” as a transverse slit passing right across the skull between the eye sockets (Fig.  4 c).

Conclusions

Presented here is a very brief summary of some of the evidence of detailed brain morphology that can be retrieved from the fossil record of early vertebrates. Such complexity, revealed by 400-million-year-old fossils, would not have been imagined possible by Charles Darwin in 1859. However, all the observations are entirely consistent with predictions of his theory, as well as the computer modeling predictions indicating evolution of an eye by small increments in less than one million years. Rather than “intelligent design,” the structure of the oldest preserved fossil evidence for the vertebrate eye and brain shows the legacy of an ancestral segmented animal in the derivation and arrangement of nerves and muscles controlling eye movement, subdivision of the braincase, and other features. Despite the complexity, the organisation of the brain and eye in the 400-million-year-old fossil fish from Burrinjuck illustrated here demonstrate a unique morphology, intermediate between living jawless and jawed vertebrates. Thus, they fit neatly within both a morphological “gap”, and a significant hiatus in the fossil record. Like the osteichthyan braincase from Burrinjuck, and many other vertebrate fossils elucidated since Darwin’s time, these are examples of the transitional forms that he predicted—they show combinations of characters that have never been observed together in living species.

Finally, this brief essay attempts to convey some sense of the historical development of science—advancements in knowledge since the work of Charles Darwin who, in turn, was accommodating a vast body of previous evidence accumulated by dedicated scientists over at least 2,000 years of detailed human enquiry into the complexity of life on earth. It is appropriate, therefore, to finish by expanding slightly the quotation from The Origin of Species given in the first paragraph of the Introduction. Darwin stated ( 1859 , p. 133): ‘To suppose that the eye…could have been formed by natural selection, seems…absurd in the highest degree. When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned around, the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false’.

Balfour FM. A monograph on the development of elasmobranch fishes. London: Macmillan; 1878.

Book   Google Scholar  

Basden AM, Young GC. A primitive actinopterygian neurocranium from the Early Devonian of southeastern Australia. J Vertebr Paleontology. 2001;21:754–66. doi: 10.1671/0272-4634(2001)021[0754:APANFT]2.0.CO;2 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Basden AM, Young GC, Coates MI, Ritchie A. The most primitive osteichthyan braincase? Nature. 2000;403:185–8. doi: 10.1038/35003183 .

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Cole FJ. A history of comparative anatomy from Aristotle to the eighteenth century. London: Macmillan; 1949. (1975 edition, New York: Dover).

Google Scholar  

Darwin C. The origin of species by means of natural selection (6th edition). New York: The Modern Library, Random House; 1859.

Dawkins R. The blind watchmaker. London: Penguin; 1991. p. 340.

Dawkins R. Climbing mount improbable. New York: Viking; 1996. p. 308.

Fortey R. Trilobite! Eyewitness to evolution. London: HarperCollins; 2000. 284 pp, Random House, New York.

Gagnier P-Y. Ordovician vertebrates and agnathan phylogeny. Bull Mus Natl Hist Nat Paris. 1995;17:1–37.

Gehring WJ. New perspectives on eye development and the evolution of eyes and photoreceptors. J Hered. 2005;96:171–84. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esi027 .

Goujet D. Les poissons placodermes du Spitsberg. Cahiers de Paléontologie, Section Vertébrés. Paris: CNRS; 1984.

Goujet D, Young GC. Placoderm anatomy and phylogeny: new insights. In Arratia G, Wilson M, Cloutier R, editors. Recent advances in the origin and early radiation of vertebrates. Munich: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; 2004. pp. 109–126.

Gregory TR. The evolution of complex organs. Evol Educ Outreach. 2008;1(4). doi: 10.1007/s12052-008-0076-1 .

Janvier P. Les yeux des cyclostomes fossils et le probleme de l’origine des myxinoides. Acta Zool. 1975;56:1–9.

Janvier P. Les Cephalaspides du Spitsberg. Anatomie, phylogenie et systematique des Osteostraces Siluro-Devoniens. Cahiers de Paléontologie, Section Vertébrés, Paris: CNRS; 1985.

Janvier P. Early vertebrates. Oxford: Clarendon; 1996. 393 pp.

Janvier P. Vertebrate characters and the Cambrian vertebrates. C R Palevol. 2003;2:523–31. doi: 10.1016/j.crpv.2003.09.002 .

Land MF, Nilsson DE. Animal eyes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.

Long JA, Young GC. Acanthothoracid remains from the early Devonian of New South Wales, including a complete sclerotic capsule and pelvic girdle. Ass Australas Palaeontol Mem. 1988;7:65–80.

Motani R, Rothschild BM, Wahl W. Large eyeballs in diving ichthyosaurs. Nature. 1999;402:747. doi: 10.1038/45435 .

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Neal HV. The history of the eye muscles. J Morphol. 1918;30:433–53. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1050300202 .

Nilsson DE, Pelger S. A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to develop. Proc R Soc Lond. 1994;256:53–8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0048 .

Paley W. (1802) Natural Theology; or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, collected from the Appearances of Nature. 5th edition, printed for R. Faulder, 1803.

Stensiö EA. On the head of the macropetalichthyids, with certain remarks on the head of the other arthrodires. Publ Field Museum Nat Hist Geol. 1925;4:87–197.

Stensiö EA. The Devonian and Downtonian vertebrates of Spitsbergen. 1. Family Cephalaspidae. Skrifter Svalbard Ishavet. 1927;12:1–391.

Stensiö EA. The brain and cranial nerves in fossil, lower craniate vertebrates. Skrifter u. Norsk. Videnskaps Akad. Oslo Mater Naturo Kl. 1963;13:1–120.

Shu DG, Luo HL, Conway Morris S, Zhang XL, Hu SX, Chen L, et al. Lower Cambrian vertebrates from south China. Nature. 1999;402:42–6. doi: 10.1038/46965 .

Shu DG, Conway Morris S, Han J, Zhang ZF, Yasui K, Janvier P, et al. Head and backbone of the Early Cambrian vertebrate Haikouichthys. Nature. 2003;421:526–9. doi: 10.1038/nature01264 .

White EI. Australian arthrodires. Bull Br Mus (Nat. History) (Geology) 1952;1:249–304.

Young GC. New information on the structure and relationships of Buchanosteus (Placodermi, Euarthrodira) from the Early Devonian of New South Wales. Zool J Linn Soc. 1979;66:309–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1979.tb01912.x .

Young GC. A new Early Devonian placoderm from New South Wales, Australia, with a discussion of placoderm phylogeny. Palaeontographica. 1980;167A:10–76.

Young GC. The relationships of placoderm fishes. Zool J Linn Soc. 1986;88:1–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb00876.x .

Young GC. Number and arrangement of extraocular muscles in primitive gnathostomes: evidence from extinct placoderm fishes. Biol Lett. 2008;4:110–4. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0545 .

Article   PubMed Central   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Young GC, Karatajute-Talimaa V, Smith MM. A possible Late Cambrian vertebrate from Australia. Nature. 1996;383:810–2. doi: 10.1038/383810a0 .

Young GC, Lelievre H, Goujet D. Primitive jaw structure in an articulated brachythoracid arthrodire (placoderm fish; Early Devonian) from southeastern Australia. J Vert Paleontol. 2001;18:261–74.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank T. Ryan Gregory for the invitation to contribute this article and for editorial support, two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments, Tim Senden and Ajay Limaye (ANU) for scanning images (Fig.  2 b), and Philippe Janvier and Pierre-Yves Gagnier (Paris) for permission to use and modify their reconstructions (Fig.  1 ). Supporting research is funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP0772138: “Old brains, new data”).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

Gavin C. Young

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gavin C. Young .

Glossary of terms

the eighth cranial nerve (also called ‘vestibulocochlear’), which innervates the inner ear

the sixth cranial nerve, a motor nerve innervating one or two of the extraocular muscles controlling eye movement

vertebrates that lack jaws, of which there are two modern types (lampreys and hagfish); fossil representatives, with a well-ossified skeleton, are much more diverse (e.g. Arandaspidida and Astraspidida from the Ordovician, Heterostraci, Osteostraci, Galeaspidida, Pituriaspidida from the Siluro-Devonian)

an expansion in each semicircular canal which housed hair cells that respond to liquid movement within the inner ear cavity

the structure of the body, strictly speaking as worked out from the method of dissection (from the Greek anatome; to cut up or dissect); comparative anatomy compares structures in different animals to elucidate their evolutionary origins. The term applies to fossil investigation particularly when “dissecting” techniques are used to extract information (e.g. acid etching, serial sectioning, etc.).

a block of cartilage, part of the endoskeleton, formed as an expansion of the anterior end of the vertebral column, to house the brain; in placoderms and osteichthyans, it is enclosed by skull bones of the dermal skeleton. In a mammal, the ossified braincase and the dermal skull bones are intimately connected

one of two major groups of living fishes (the cartilaginous fishes), exemplified by modern sharks and rays, with an internal skeleton mainly of cartilage and the external skeleton (except the teeth) mainly developed as tiny denticles embedded in the skin

the major nerves extending out from the brain; 12 pairs numbered sequentially from the front is the traditional scheme based on the condition in mammals; in early fishes some of these are not developed, or composite origin is indicated by separate nerves

the external skeleton of vertebrates formed in the skin (dermis) and comprising various types of hard bony tissues (including dentine and enamel) but never cartilage; examples in a mammal are the bones at the top of the skull, the teeth and the clavicle bone in the shoulder girdle

the study of embryos at different stages to investigate the development of different organs and structures and to compare development in different animals to elucidate the evolutionary origin of shared features

the internal skeleton of vertebrates always forming first as cartilage, which may later be partly or completely replaced by bone. Examples are the braincase and vertebral column and the limb bones of mammals.

see dermal skeleton

the muscles controlling movement of the eyeball, the basic arrangement being four rectus muscles spreading out from the back of the eye socket to insert around the rim of the eyeball and two oblique muscles extending out from the anterior part of the eye socket to insert at the top and bottom of the eyeball rim

a flexible rod of cartilage (also called the “optic pedicel”) that connects the eyeball to the braincase in most modern cartilaginous fishes (sharks and rays)

the seventh cranial nerve, partly sensory (with fibers to the taste buds) but mainly a motor nerve controlling the muscles of the face in mammals (hence, its name) and also the stapedial muscle (all derived from the branchial muscles of the hyoid arch in a fish)

the ninth cranial nerve, supplying the first branchial arch in fishes; in mammals innervating the throat and tongue

a vertebrate possessing jaws, apparently formed originally by enlargement and strengthening of the front pair of gill arches (the mandibular arch), on which were developed various biting structures like teeth and jawbones

the upper element of the first gill arch behind the jaws (the hyoid arch), in most gnathostome fishes enlarged to support the jaws but losing this function in land animals (ultimately becoming the mammalian stapes in the middle ear)

the cavity of the inner ear; in mammals, enclosed in intricate spaces within the periotic bone, suggesting the maze of winding passages without exit from Greek mythology (from which the name is derived); it contains the organ of balance, the liquid-filled “membranous labyrinth,”

a pocket within the eye socket containing the attachment for one or more extraocular muscles; most teleost fishes have a very large posterior myodome for the four rectus muscles

the third cranial nerve, a motor nerve innervating four of the gnathostome extraocular muscles controlling eye movement

the paired cartilaginous capsule at the front of the braincase enclosing the nasal sacs

the first cranial nerve, the sensory nerve for olfaction (sense of smell), unusual in having the cell bodies in the epithelial lining of the nasal sacs, with sensory fibers running back to the olfactory bulb of the brain

the second cranial nerve, more properly considered a tract of the brain because the cell bodies of optic nerve fibers are in the retina, and this forms embryologically as an outgrowth of the brain tube

the socket on each side of a skull that contains the eyeball

to turn into bone; i.e. the process involving deposition of mineralized hard tissue in the form of calcium phosphate, secreted by specialised bone-forming cells (osteocytes)

the second major group of living fishes, differing from sharks and rays (see chondrichthyans) in possessing a complete bony skeleton. Two major subdivisions are the ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii, the dominant modern group) and lobe-finned fishes (Sarcopterygii; represented today only by a few species of lungfish, and the coelacanth Latimeria)

a paired cartilaginous part of the braincase located behind the eyes, and enclosing the labyrinth cavity, containing the organ of balance in early aquatic vertebrates

a connective tissue layer of dense cells on the growing surface of a cartilage, which may ossify as concentric layers of bone (termed “periosteal” bone when the inner part of a cartilage is also replaced by bone)

the extinct armoured fishes, the most diverse jawed vertebrates during the Devonian Period. An external skeleton of bony plates enclosed the head and shoulder girdle but with a different pattern to the osteichthyan fishes, suggesting that part or all of the dermal skeleton evolved independently. Some placoderms had blade-like cutting toothplates in the jaws, but they lacked true teeth

one of the main liquid-filled sacs of the membranous labyrinth, containing a concentration of hair cells capped by calcareous crystals, which in teleosts becomes a compact “otolith” or earstone almost filling the cavity

a curved, tube-like part of the labyrinth cavity. All jawed vertebrates have three semicircular canals, oriented at about 90° to each other, an integral part of the organ of balance

the most diverse living vertebrates with some 30,000 species; teleosts are a highly evolved subgroup of the ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii), which have a fossil record extending back to the Silurian Period

the fifth cranial nerve, a large nerve with three main branches (ophthalmic, maxillary, mandibular) bringing sensory fibers from the region around the eye, and upper and lower jaws respectively. The mandibular branch also includes the motor fibers for the jaw muscles. In primitive fishes the ophthalmic branch may be a distinct nerve (the profundus, passing at a deep level through the orbit to the snout)

the fourth cranial nerve, a motor nerve which in all vertebrates innervates a single extraocular muscle, the superior (posterior) oblique

one of two main liquid-filled sacs of the membranous labyrinth, containing a concentration of hair cells capped by calcareous crystals to increase sensitivity to liquid movements within the inner ear

the tenth cranial nerve, a large nerve innervating the posterior gill arches of fishes, with its main branch running back along the vertebral column to the heart and viscera.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Young, G.C. Early Evolution of the Vertebrate Eye—Fossil Evidence. Evo Edu Outreach 1 , 427–438 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0087-y

Download citation

Received : 24 June 2008

Accepted : 08 September 2008

Published : 18 October 2008

Issue Date : October 2008

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0087-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Vertebrates
• Brain structure
• Cranial nerves
• Eye evolution
• Transitional forms
• Charles Darwin
• Intelligent design

Evolution: Education and Outreach

ISSN: 1936-6434

• Submission enquiries: [email protected]

We will keep fighting for all libraries - stand with us!

Internet Archive Audio

• This Just In
• Grateful Dead
• Old Time Radio
• 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
• Audio Books & Poetry
• Computers, Technology and Science
• Music, Arts & Culture
• News & Public Affairs
• Spirituality & Religion
• Radio News Archive

• Flickr Commons
• Occupy Wall Street Flickr
• NASA Images
• Solar System Collection
• Ames Research Center

• All Software
• Old School Emulation
• MS-DOS Games
• Historical Software
• Classic PC Games
• Software Library
• Kodi Archive and Support File
• Vintage Software
• CD-ROM Software
• CD-ROM Software Library
• Software Sites
• Tucows Software Library
• Shareware CD-ROMs
• Software Capsules Compilation
• CD-ROM Images
• ZX Spectrum
• DOOM Level CD

• Smithsonian Libraries
• FEDLINK (US)
• Lincoln Collection
• American Libraries
• Canadian Libraries
• Universal Library
• Project Gutenberg
• Children's Library
• Biodiversity Heritage Library
• Books by Language
• Additional Collections

• Prelinger Archives
• Democracy Now!
• Occupy Wall Street
• TV NSA Clip Library
• Animation & Cartoons
• Arts & Music
• Computers & Technology
• Cultural & Academic Films
• Ephemeral Films
• Sports Videos
• Videogame Videos
• Youth Media

Search the history of over 866 billion web pages on the Internet.

Mobile Apps

• Wayback Machine (iOS)
• Wayback Machine (Android)

Browser Extensions

Archive-it subscription.

• Explore the Collections
• Build Collections

Save Page Now

Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future.

Please enter a valid web address

• Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape

Evolution of the vertebrates : a history of the backboned animals through time

Bookreader item preview, share or embed this item, flag this item for.

• Graphic Violence
• Explicit Sexual Content
• Hate Speech
• Misinformation/Disinformation
• Marketing/Phishing/Advertising
• Misleading/Inaccurate/Missing Metadata

plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews

13 Favorites

Better World Books

DOWNLOAD OPTIONS

No suitable files to display here.

IN COLLECTIONS

Uploaded by station54.cebu on October 14, 2020

SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata)

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• My Account Login
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 09 May 2024

Pulmonary arteries in coelacanths shed light on the vasculature evolution of air-breathing organs in vertebrates

• Camila Cupello 1 ,
• Gaël Clément 2 ,
• Marc Herbin 3 ,
• François J. Meunier 4 &
• Paulo M. Brito 1  

Scientific Reports volume  14 , Article number:  10624 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

• Ichthyology
• Palaeontology

To date, the presence of pulmonary organs in the fossil record is extremely rare. Among extant vertebrates, lungs are described in actinopterygian polypterids and in all sarcopterygians, including coelacanths and lungfish. However, vasculature of pulmonary arteries has never been accurately identified neither in fossil nor extant coelacanths due to the paucity of fossil preservation of pulmonary organs and limitations of invasive studies in extant specimens. Here we present the first description of the pulmonary vasculature in both fossil and extant actinistian, a non-tetrapod sarcopterygian clade, contributing to a more in-depth discussion on the morphology of these structures and on the possible homology between vertebrate air-filled organs (lungs of sarcopterygians, lungs of actinopterygians, and gas bladders of actinopterygians).

Introduction

Vascular canals and/or spaces are rarely documented in fossil bones. They have been described using both traditional techniques, such as ground sections (e.g. the Devonian osteostracan agnathan Norselaspis glacialis 1 ), and advanced technologies such as synchrotron imaging. Regarding early vertebrates, phase contrast X-ray synchrotron imaging of an acanthothoracid placoderm from the Early Devonian of Canadian Artic Archipelago has provided a detailed three-dimensional view of the skull vascularization and nerve canals 2 . The same technique also revealed vascular spaces in other taxa, such as the vascular mesh of the interolateral plate of the placoderm Compagopiscis croucheri (Late Devonian of Gogo Formation, Western Australia) or the vascular architecture of the humerus of Eusthenopteron , a sarcopterygian fish close to tetrapods (Late Devonian of Québec, Canada) 3 . Among tetrapods, traces of fossil blood vessels (arteries and veins) were reported for instance in the nasal bone of Discosauriscus austriacus from the Early Permian of Czech Republic 3 , in a Triceratops skull from the Upper Cretaceous of Hell Creek Formation, Montana 4 , in whale bones from the Middle-Upper Miocene of Peru) 5 , and in turtles from the Eocene of Germany and Miocene of Colombia 6 . These might represent internal moulds of the vascular walls or even the filling of the vascular channels 5 .

On the other hand, pulmonary vasculature (including traces such as internal moulds) has not been documented in vertebrate fossils to date. Pulmonary arteries and veins are documented in all groups of extant osteichthyans, except in Lepisosteidae (where the dorsal aorta serves as the afferent blood supply to the respiratory gas bladder), and in Chondrostei and Teleostei (which exhibit celiacomesenteric arteries) 7 . However, pulmonary arteries have never been properly described in any developmental stage of the extant coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae. This may be due to the challenge of visualizing vessels in x-ray microtomography (the unique effective non-invasive methodology to study all developmental stages of extant coelacanths) without the presence of a contrast solution or even to the reabsorption of vascularization in adult specimens of the extant coelacanth that possess a vestigial lung 8 , 9 , 10 . Based on histological thin sections of the lung lumen, pulmonary arteries were first erroneously described due to a misconception involving the pulmonary bony plates that are located on the vestigial lung 11 , 12 . More recently, these small and dense plates that surround the vestigial lung of Latimeria chalumnae were described as homologous to the calcified plates of Palaeozoic and Mesozoic coelacanth lungs 11 .

Here we describe, for the first time, the presence of pulmonary vessels in both fossil and extant coelacanths. These new observations confirm the air-breathing function of the so-called calcified organ in fossil coelacanths and the regressed state of the so-called vestigial lung in extant coelacanths. Presence of pulmonary vessels within this group resolves a piece of the puzzle regarding the evolution of air-breathing in vertebrates.

Identification of pulmonary vasculature in the fossil coelacanth Macropoma mantelli (Late Cretaceous, Chalk Formation, Lewes, England)

The calcified lung of the specimen NHMUK PV 4270 is a well-developed unpaired organ, tubular in shape. It displays large superimposed bony plates surrounding a wide lumen (Fig.  1 ). Plates are rounded in shape and present a concave internal side. The lung is preserved in a ventral, but distorted, position, without division into chambers and without constriction (Fig.  1 a), as known in some other fossil coelacanths. The anterior opening is not visible. The specimen, its tomographic segmentation, and three-dimensional reconstructions (Fig.  1 a and b), clearly display the impression of the dorsal aorta, the most important vessel of the circulatory system, along the entire length of the external surface of the lung (Fig.  1 a and b). Two pulmonary arteries, both with the same length, are also present parallel, but internal to the lung lumen and recovered by the bony plates (Figs.  1 c, 2 ). These arteries are connected to each other by a transversal vessel. The pulmonary arteries give raise to branches of some arteries, as vascular channels (Fig.  1 c).

The pulmonary system of the Cretaceous coelacanth Macropoma mantelli NHMUK PV P 4270. ( a ) Photograph of specimen NHMUK PV 4270 in left lateral view. ( b ) Three-dimensional reconstruction of NHMUK PV 4270 with highlighting of the calcified lung, dorsal aorta and pulmonary arteries. ( c ) Close-up of the dorsal aorta and left and right pulmonary arteries. Pink, calcified lung; purple, pulmonary arteries; blue, dorsal aorta. Ang fragment of the angular bone, Cl cleithrum, Da dorsal aorta, Gu gular bone,  L lung, Lp left pulmonary artery, Rp right pulmonary artery.

The calcified lung of Macropoma mantelli NHMUK PV P 4270. ( a ) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the calcified lung of the specimen. ( b , c ) Transverse sections of a high-resolution computerized axial tomography scan of NHMUK PV P 4270. Green arrows pointing to the pulmonary arteries internal to the lung lumen. Blue arrows, pointing to the dorsal aorta. Transverse tomography sections ( b , c ) corresponding to the successive dotted sections in ( a ).

Evidence of pulmonary vasculature in a juvenile extant coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae

The lung of this juvenile coelacanth of 42.5 cm total length (specimen CCC 94) is unpaired, conical in shape and ventral to the oesophagus (Fig.  3 ). It is 2.157 cm long, corresponding to 15.88% of the length of the fatty organ and 5.13% of the length of the specimen (Fig.  3 b). No bony plates are observed by X-ray tomography at this ontogenetic stage. The relative proportions between the lung and the total length (TL) of this specimen is lower in comparison to the same ration in embryos and higher in comparison with the same ratio in adult specimens 8 .

The pulmonary system of a juvenile specimen of the extant coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae . ( a ) Photograph of specimen CCC 94 (42.5 cm TL) in left lateral view. ( b ) Three-dimensional reconstruction of CCC 94. ( c ) Close-up of the three-dimensional reconstruction of the vestigial lung with left and right pulmonary arteries. ( d ) Close-up of the left and right pulmonary arteries. Pink, vestigial lung; purple, pulmonary arteries. Lp left pulmonary artery, Rp right pulmonary artery.

The specimen CCC 94 was historically injected with colloidal barite for observation of the circulatory system 12 , which reduced the quality of the tomography data for the soft tissues (Extended Data Fig. 1). However, this ancient injection has today enabled the visualization of the pulmonary arteries by X-ray tomography (usually not visible in coelacanth specimens without adding of colloidal barite) (Extended Data Fig. 1). The vestigial lung of CCC 94 is irrigated by two atrophied pulmonary arteries (Fig.  3 c). Both pulmonary arteries run along the ventral surface of the vestigial lung. The dorsal aorta is not visible in this specimen, due to the artefacts generated by the massive injection of the contrast product. Indeed, barite strongly absorb X-rays, resulting in a local hyper-signal that obscures the anatomical structures on tomographic data. No vascularization canals or branches were observed within the fatty organ or in the connective tissue surrounding it (Fig.  3 d).

Despite the rarity of preserved air-filled organs (AO 13 ) in the fossil record, remains of pulmonary organs are known in an ornithuromorph bird, a salamander, a tadpole, as well as in almost all Palaeozoic and Mesozoic coelacanth families 10 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 . Almost all well-preserved fossil coelacanths, except some taxa such as Diplurus , Coccoderma suevicum and juveniles of Axelrodichthys araripensis , show well preserved ossified plates in their abdominal cavity 18 . These bony plates are superimposed, multilayered, and separated from one another by unossified connective tissue, likely enabling their mobility for volume adjustment during air-breathing, as well as providing protection against hydrostatic pressure 11 , 14 . The tubular structure, called the calcified organ, delimitated by a characteristic organization of these ossified plates has been recently considered as a structure constitutive of a functional lung in fossil coelacanths, homologous of the vestigial lung of extant coelacanths 8 , 11 , 14 .

The Cretaceous coelacanth specimen of Macropoma mantelli here studied has a well-developed pulmonary organ with ossified plates surrounding it, as well as well-developed dorsal aorta, pair of pulmonary arteries, and supplementary pulmonary branches irrigating this air-breathing organ. The extant coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae , which inhabits moderately deep waters and do not perform aerial gas exchange, shows a vestigial lung with vestigial vasculature, consisting of only a pair of pulmonary arteries.

Coelacanths are key taxa for the understanding of the evolutionary steps of the air-breathing history in osteichthyans. These occurrences of pulmonary vasculatures in both fossil and extant coelacanths reinforce the homology hypothesis between the fossil calcified organ and the vestigial lung. They then shed light on the evolution of the pulmonary complex within the actinistian clade and particularly on the loss of air-breathing during deep-marine water adaptation of the Latimeria relatives. Presence of lung vascular systems in both fossil and extant coelacanths also provides new anatomical elements concerning the evolutionary history of the vascular supply of air-filled organs in osteichthyans and the homology between lungs and gas bladders (also called swimbladders or air bladders).

Lungs and gas bladders are morphologically distinct air-filled organs that can serve the functions of buoyancy control and/or air-breathing. The homology (or lack thereof) between these organs has been a subject of discussion for almost 180 years 19 , 20 . Since the nineteenth century, this discussion has been based on morphological and molecular analysis. Among the molecular aspects, some authors have proposed homology based on the co-expression of genes in both tetrapod lungs and actinopterygian gas bladders 21 , homologous genes shared between gas bladders and the human lung 22 , and the similar surfactant system between both air-filled organs 23 . Morphologically, a homology was proposed based on different developmental stages of extant taxa that present a common origin from the posterior portion of the respiratory pharynx 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ), their identical arterial supply 7 , 13 , 25 , 28 , and their similar hydrostatic and/or respiratory function 13 , 29 . Indeed, the only morphological difference between lungs and gas bladders is the ventral and dorsal origins from the foregut 21 , 30 . Other characteristics previously used to differentiate both organs have been discarded in recent studies, as the lungs of actinopterygians and sarcopterygians, as well as the respiratory gas bladder of some actinopterygians, share certain morphological conditions 9 , 10 . However, sharing the same function and/or morphology does not necessarily imply homology 9 , 10 , 21 , 30 .

Based on our results, we confirm that extant and fossil coelacanths possess pulmonary arteries homologous to the same paired branches of the air-filled organs (including gas bladders) of other osteichthyans (Fig.  4 ). We also support the hypothesis that pulmonary arteries are a synapomorphy of Osteichthyes (Fig.  5 ). If considering the common arterial supply as an indicator of homology between lungs and gas bladders, our results may contribute to a better understanding of the homology of air-breathing organs in vertebrates (Fig.  5 ), but further studies may explore better this condition, as well as the anatomy of fossil and extant chondrichthyans to support the absence of pulmonary arteries in this group.

Schematic figure with a comparison of the pulmonary vascularization in Osteichthyes with potentially functional air-breathing organs (modified from Longo et al. 2013). ( a ) The actinopterygian Polypterus senegalus . ( b ) the holostean Amia calva . ( c ) the fossil coelacanth Macropoma mantelli . ( d ) the lungfish Protopterus dolloi . C celiacomesenteric artery, Da dorsal aorta, Lp left pulmonary artery, Rp right pulmonary artery.

Schematic reconstruction of the evolutionary history of vertebrate lungs. Unpaired lung, pulmonary arteries and pulmonary arteries are plesiomorphies of Osteichthyes. Modified from Cupello et al. 10 . This figure was made with free silhouettes from PhyloPic.

Specimen CCC 94 is a juvenile female of Latimeria chalumnae (42.5 cm TL) fished on a line in Comoro Islands in 1974 31 . This specimen was injected with colloidal barite to facilitate the observation of the circulatory system 12 . It was scanned with long propagation phase-contrast synchrotron X-ray microtomography at the ID19 beamline of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Grenoble, France) in a plastic tube filled with water and with a propagation distance of 13 m. The beam produced by the wiggler was filtered by 2 mm of aluminium and 15 mm of copper, at a gap of 30 mm, and resulting in an average detected energy of 170 keV with a bandwidth of 85 keV FWHM. The voxel size of the scan is 28.43 μm and the final reconstructions of 85.29 μm was obtained after binning. Slices were reconstructed with filtered back-projection algorithm, a single distance phase-retrieval process 3 , 32 . Sub-scans were converted into 16-bit TIFF stacks and concatenated to generate a single complete scan. For more detail, see Cupello et al. 8 .

Specimen NHMUK PV 4270 is an adult specimen of the fossil coelacanth Macropoma mantelli from the Late Cretaceous of Chalk Formation, Lewes, Sussex, UK. X-ray computed micro-tomography (µCT) scanning of this specimen was performed at the AST-RX Platform of the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France. The voltage was 140 kV, current 350 mA, voxel size 127.85 µm and the view number was 1500.

For both specimens, segmentation and three-dimensional rendering were realized using the software MIMICS Innovation Suite 20.0 to 25.0 (Materialise) at the Laboratório de Ictiologia Tempo e Espaço of the Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.

Data availability

Data can be made available by the corresponding author upon request.

Janvier, P., Percy, L. R. & Potter, I. C. The arrangement of the heart chambers and associated blood vessels in the Devonian osteostracan Norselaspis glacialis . A reinterpretation based on recent studies of the circulatory system in lampreys. J. Zool. 223 , 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1991.tb04388.x (1991).

Article   Google Scholar  

Dupret, V., Sanchez, S., Goujet, D., Tafforeau, P. & Ahlberg, P. E. Bone vascularization and growth in placoderms (Vertebrata): The example of the premedian plate of Romundina stellina Ørvig, 1975. C. R. Palevol. 9 , 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2010.07.005 (2010).

Sanchez, S., Ahlberg, P. E., Trinajstic, K. M., Mirone, A. & Tafforeau, P. Three-dimensional synchrotron virtual paleohistology: A new insight into the world of fossil bone microstructures. Microsc. Microanal. 18 , 1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927612001079 (2012).

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Happ, J. W. & Morrow, C. M. Evidence of soft tissue associated with nasal and supraorbital horn cores, rostral and exoccipital of Triceratops. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 20 , 1–86 (2000).

Google Scholar  

Boskovic, D. S. et al. Structural and protein preservation in fossil whale bones from the Pisco formation (middle-upper Miocene), Peru. Palaios 36 , 155–164. https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2020.032 (2021).

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Cadena, E. A. In situ SEM/EDS compositional characterization of osteocytes and blood vessels in fossil and extant turtles on untreated bone surfaces; different preservational pathways microns away. PeerJ 8 , e9833. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9833 (2020).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Longo, S., Riccio, M. & McCune, A. R. Homology of lungs and gas bladders: Insights from arterial vasculature. J. Morphol. 274 , 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20128 (2013).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Cupello, C. et al. Allometric growth in the extant coelacanth lung during ontogenetic development. Nat. Commun. 6 , 8222. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9222 (2015).

Cupello, C., Meunier, F. J., Herbin, M., Clément, G. & Brito, P. M. Lung anatomy and histology of the extant coelacanth shed light on the loss of air-breathing during deep-water adaptation in actinistians. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4 , 161030. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.161030 (2017).

Article   ADS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Cupello, C. et al. Lung evolution in vertebrates and the water-to-land transition. Elife 11 , e77156. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77156 (2022).

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Cupello, C. et al. The homology and function of the lung plates in extant and fossil coelacanths. Sci. Rep. 7 , 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09327-6 (2017).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Millot, J., Anthony, J. & Robineau, D. Anatomie de Latimeria chalumnae III (CNRS, 1978).

Perry, S. F., Wilson, R. J. A., Straus, C., Harris, M. B. & Remmers, J. E. Which came first, the lung or the breath?. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 129 , 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(01)00304-X (2001).

Brito, P. M., Meunier, F. J., Clément, G. & Geffard-Kuriyama, D. The histological structure of the calcified lung of the fossil coelacanth Axelrodichthys araripensis (Actinistia: Mawsoniidae). Palaeontology 53 , 1281–1290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.00998.x (2010).

Tissier, J., Rage, J. C. & Laurin, M. Exceptional soft tissues preservation in a mummified frog-eating Eocene salamander. PeerJ 5 , e3861. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3861 (2017).

Wang, X. et al. Archaeorhynchus preserving significant soft tissue including probable fossilized lungs. PNAS 115 , 11555–11560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805803115 (2018).

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Rossi, V., McNamara, M. E., Webb, S. M., Ito, S. & Wakamatsu, K. Tissue-specific geometry and chemistry of modern and fossilized melanosomes reveal internal anatomy of extinct vertebrates. PNAS 116 , 17880–17889. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820285116 (2019).

Cupello, C., Clément, G. & Brito, P. M. Evolution of air breathing and lung distribution among fossil fishes. In Evolution and Development of Fishes (ed. Johanson, Z.) 252–262 (Cambridge University Press, 2019).

Owen, R. Lectures on the Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Vertebrate Animals, delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons of England, in 1844 and 1846 308 (Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1846).

Darwin, C. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection 502 (Murray, 1859).

Cass, A. N., Servetnick, M. D. & McCune, A. R. Expression of a lung developmental cassette in the adult and developing zebrafish swimbladder. Evol. Dev. 15 , 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/ede.12017 (2013).

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Cui, J. et al. Transciptome analysis of the gill and swimbladder of Takifugu rubripes by RNA-Seq. PLoS One 9 , e85505 (2014).

Daniels, C. B. et al. The origin and evolution of the surfactant system in fish: Insights into the evolution of lungs and swim bladders. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 77 , 732–749 (2004).

Goodrich, E. S. Studies on the structure and development of vertebrates. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 74 , 678. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-193111000-00026 (1931).

Perry, S. F. & Sander, M. Reconstructing the evolution of the respiratory apparatus in tetrapods. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 144 , 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2004.06.018 (2004).

Neumayer, L. Die entwicklung des darms von acipenser. Acta Zool. 11 , 39–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.1930.tb00123.x (1930).

Wassnetzov, W. Über die morphologie der schwimmblase. Zool. Jahrb. Allg. Zool 56 , 1–36 (1932).

Zheng, W. et al. Comparative transcriptome analyses indicate molecular homology of zebrafish swimbladder and mammalian lung. PLoS One 6 , e24019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024019 (2011).

Liem, K. F. Form and function of lungs: The evolution of air breathing mechanisms. Am. Zool. 28 , 739–759. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/28.2.739 (1988).

Funk, E., Lencer, E. & McCune, A. Dorsoventral inversion of the air-filled organ (lungs, gas bladder) in vertebrates: RNA sequencing of laser capture microdissected embryonic tissue. J. Exp. Zool. B 334 , 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22998 (2020).

Nulens, R., Scott, L. & Herbin, M. An updated inventory of all known specimens of the Coelacanth Latimeria spp. S. Afr. Inst. Aquat. Biodivers. 3 , 1–52 (2011).

Paganin, D., Mayo, S. C., Gureyev, T. E., Miller, P. R. & Wilkins, S. W. Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object. J. Microsc. 206 , 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01010.x (2002).

Article   MathSciNet   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are especially grateful to the editor S. Stumpf and the anonymous referees for their valuable comments. We are grateful to E. Bernard (Curator of Palaeobiology, Natural History Museum, Earth Science, United Kingdom) for providing access to the fossil fish collection and for the loan of the Macropoma mantelli specimen. X-ray tomography scans of Macropoma mantelli were performed at the X-ray Tomography Imagery Platform AST-RX, 'Plateau technique d’Accès Scientifique à la Tomographie à Rayons X', MNHN, Paris, France (funded by MNHN, CNRS, Institut de France, Région Île-de-France). We thank M. García Sanz for the X-ray tomography scans and F. Goussard for support at the 3D Imaging facilities of the CR2P laboratory. Thanks are also due to L. Cazes for the photography of specimen CCC 79. Synchrotron experiments were performed on the ID19 beamline at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Grenoble, France. We are grateful to P. Tafforeau at ESRF for assistance during the experiment.

C.C. research was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—grant Finance Code 001 (Programa Nacional de Pós Doutorado-PNPD); Programa de Apoio à Docência (PAPD) grant (E-26/007/10661/2019)—Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; and FAPERJ grants E-26/200.605/2022; E-26/210.369/2022. P.M.B research was supported by CNPq grant 305118/2021-8 and FAPERJ 26/201.172/2022.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia-IBRAG, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Camila Cupello & Paulo M. Brito

Département Origines & Evolution, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, UMR 7207 (MNHN–CNRS–Sorbonne Universités) Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie (CR2P), Paris, France

Gaël Clément

Département Adaptations du Vivant, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, UMR 7179 (CNRS-MNHN) Mécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution (MECADEV), Paris, France

Marc Herbin

Département Adaptations du Vivant, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, UMR 8067 (CNRS-IRD-MNHN-Sorbonne Universités-UCN, UA), Laboratoire de Biologie des Organismes et des Ecosystèmes Aquatiques (BOREA), Paris, France

François J. Meunier

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Study Concept and Design: C.C. Acquisition of Data: C.C., G.C, M.H. Analysis and Interpretation of the Data: C.C., G.C., M.H., F.J.M., and P.M.B. Writing original draft: C.C. Reviewing and editing the draft: C.C., G.C., M.H., F.J.M, and P.M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camila Cupello .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information 1., supplementary information 2., supplementary information 3., supplementary information 4., rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Cupello, C., Clément, G., Herbin, M. et al. Pulmonary arteries in coelacanths shed light on the vasculature evolution of air-breathing organs in vertebrates. Sci Rep 14 , 10624 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61065-8

Download citation

Received : 27 January 2024

Accepted : 30 April 2024

Published : 09 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61065-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.