civilization vs savagery lord of the flies essay

Lord of the Flies

By william golding, lord of the flies themes, civilization vs. savagery.

The overarching theme of Lord of the Flies is the conflict between the human impulse towards savagery and the rules of civilization which are designed to contain and minimize it. Throughout the novel, the conflict is dramatized by the clash between Ralph and Jack, who respectively represent civilization and savagery. The differing ideologies are expressed by each boy's distinct attitudes towards authority. While Ralph uses his authority to establish rules, protect the good of the group, and enforce the moral and ethical codes of the English society the boys were raised in, Jack is interested in gaining power over the other boys to gratify his most primal impulses. When Jack assumes leadership of his own tribe, he demands the complete subservience of the other boys, who not only serve him but worship him as an idol. Jack's hunger for power suggests that savagery does not resemble anarchy so much as a totalitarian system of exploitation and illicit power.

Golding's emphasis on the negative consequences of savagery can be read as a clear endorsement of civilization. In the early chapters of the novel, he suggests that one of the important functions of civilized society is to provide an outlet for the savage impulses that reside inside each individual. Jack's initial desire to kill pigs to demonstrate his bravery, for example, is channeled into the hunt, which provides needed food for the entire group. As long as he lives within the rules of civilization, Jack is not a threat to the other boys; his impulses are being re-directed into a productive task. Rather, it is when Jack refuses to recognize the validity of society and rejects Ralph's authority that the dangerous aspects of his character truly emerge. Golding suggests that while savagery is perhaps an inescapable fact of human existence, civilization can mitigate its full expression.

The rift between civilization and savagery is also communicated through the novel's major symbols: the conch shell, which is associated with Ralph, and The Lord of the Flies , which is associated with Jack. The conch shell is a powerful marker of democratic order on the island, confirming both Ralph's leadership-determined by election-and the power of assembly among the boys. Yet, as the conflict between Ralph and Jack deepens, the conch shell loses symbolic importance. Jack declares that the conch is meaningless as a symbol of authority and order, and its decline in importance signals the decline of civilization on the island. At the same time, The Lord of the Flies, which is an offering to the mythical "beast" on the island, is increasingly invested with significance as a symbol of the dominance of savagery on the island, and of Jack's authority over the other boys. The Lord of the Flies represents the unification of the boys under Jack's rule as motivated by fear of "outsiders": the beast and those who refuse to accept Jack's authority. The destruction of the conch shell at the scene of Piggy 's murder signifies the complete eradication of civilization on the island, while Ralph's demolition of The Lord of the Flies-he intends to use the stick as a spear-signals his own descent into savagery and violence. By the final scene, savagery has completely displaced civilization as the prevailing system on the island.

Individualism vs. Community

One of the key concerns of Lord of the Flies is the role of the individual in society. Many of the problems on the island-the extinguishing of the signal fire, the lack of shelters, the mass abandonment of Ralph's camp, and the murder of Piggy-stem from the boys' implicit commitment to a principle of self-interest over the principle of community. That is, the boys would rather fulfill their individual desires than cooperate as a coherent society, which would require that each one act for the good of the group. Accordingly, the principles of individualism and community are symbolized by Jack and Ralph, respectively. Jack wants to "have fun" on the island and satisfy his bloodlust, while Ralph wants to secure the group's rescue, a goal they can achieve only by cooperating. Yet, while Ralph's vision is the most reasonable, it requires work and sacrifice on the part of the other boys, so they quickly shirk their societal duties in favor of fulfilling their individual desires. The shelters do not get built because the boys would rather play; the signal fire is extinguished when Jack's hunters fail to tend to it on schedule.

The boys' self-interestedness culminates, of course, when they decide to join Jack's tribe, a society without communal values whose appeal is that Jack will offer them total freedom. The popularity of his tribe reflects the enormous appeal of a society based on individual freedom and self-interest, but as the reader soon learns, the freedom Jack offers his tribe is illusory. Jack implements punitive and irrational rules and restricts his boys' behavior far more than Ralph did. Golding thus suggests not only that some level of communal system is superior to one based on pure self-interest, but also that pure individual freedom is an impossible value to sustain within a group dynamic, which will always tend towards societal organization. The difficult question, of course, is what individuals are willing to give up to gain the benefits of being in the group.

The Nature of Evil

Is evil innate within the human spirit, or is it an influence from an external source? What role do societal rules and institutions play in the existence of human evil? Does the capacity for evil vary from person to person, or does it depend on the circumstances each individual faces? These questions are at the heart of Lord of the Flies which, through detailed depictions of the boys' different responses to their situation, presents a complex articulation of humanity's potential for evil.

It is important to note that Golding's novel rejects supernatural or religious accounts of the origin of human evil. While the boys fear the "beast" as an embodiment of evil similar to the Christian concept of Satan, the novel emphasizes that this interpretation is not only mistaken but also, ironically, the motivation for the boys' increasingly cruel and violent behavior. It is their irrational fear of the beast that informs the boys' paranoia and leads to the fatal schism between Jack and Ralph and their respective followers, and this is what prevents them from recognizing and addressing their responsibility for their own impulses. Rather, as The Lord of the Flies communicates to Simon in the forest glade, the "beast" is an internal force, present in every individual, and is thus incapable of being truly defeated. That the most ethical characters on the island-Simon and Ralph-each come to recognize his own capacity for evil indicates the novel's emphasis on evil's universality among humans.

Even so, the novel is not entirely pessimistic about the human capacity for good. While evil impulses may lurk in every human psyche, the intensity of these impulses-and the ability to control them-appear to vary from individual to individual. Through the different characters, the novel presents a continuum of evil, ranging from Jack and Roger , who are eager to engage in violence and cruelty, to Ralph and Simon, who struggle to contain their brutal instincts. We may note that the characters who struggle most successfully against their evil instincts do so by appealing to ethical or social codes of behavior. For example, Ralph and Piggy demand the return of Piggy's glasses because it is the "right thing to do." Golding suggests that while evil may be present in us all, it can be successfully suppressed by the social norms that are imposed on our behavior from without or by the moral norms we decide are inherently "good," which we can internalize within our wills.

The ambiguous and deeply ironic conclusion of Lord of the Flies , however, calls into question society's role in shaping human evil. The naval officer, who repeats Jack's rhetoric of nationalism and militarism, is engaged in a bloody war that is responsible for the boys' aircraft crash on the island and that is mirrored by the civil war among the survivors. In this sense, much of the evil on the island is a result not of the boys' distance from society, but of their internalization of the norms and ideals of that society-norms and ideals that justify and even thrive on war. Are the boys corrupted by the internal pressures of an essentially violent human nature, or have they been corrupted by the environment of war they were raised in? Lord of the Flies offers no clear solution to this question, provoking readers to contemplate the complex relationships among society, morality, and human nature.

Man vs. Nature

Lord of the Flies introduces the question of man's ideal relationship with the natural world. Thrust into the completely natural environment of the island, in which no humans exist or have existed, the boys express different attitudes towards nature that reflect their distinct personalities and ideological leanings. The boys' relationships to the natural world generally fall into one of three categories: subjugation of nature, harmony with nature, and subservience to nature. The first category, subjugation of nature, is embodied by Jack, whose first impulse on the island is to track, hunt, and kill pigs. He seeks to impose his human will on the natural world, subjugating it to his desires. Jack's later actions, in particular setting the forest fire, reflect his deepening contempt for nature and demonstrate his militaristic, violent character. The second category, harmony with nature, is embodied by Simon, who finds beauty and peace in the natural environment as exemplified by his initial retreat to the isolated forest glade. For Simon, nature is not man's enemy but is part of the human experience. The third category, subservience to nature, is embodied by Ralph and is the opposite position from Jack's. Unlike Simon, Ralph does not find peaceful harmony with the natural world; like Jack, he understands it as an obstacle to human life on the island. But while Jack responds to this perceived conflict by acting destructively towards animals and plant life, Ralph responds by retreating from the natural world. He does not participate in hunting or in Simon's excursions to the deep wilderness of the forest; rather, he stays on the beach, the most humanized part of the island. As Jack's hunting expresses his violent nature to the other boys and to the reader, Ralph's desire to stay separate from the natural world emphasizes both his reluctance to tempt danger and his affinity for civilization.

Dehumanization of Relationships

In Lord of the Flies , one of the effects of the boys' descent into savagery is their increasing inability to recognize each other's humanity. Throughout the novel, Golding uses imagery to imply that the boys are no longer able to distinguish between themselves and the pigs they are hunting and killing for food and sport. In Chapter Four, after the first successful pig hunt, the hunters re-enact the hunt in a ritual dance, using Maurice as a stand-in for the doomed pig. This episode is only a dramatization, but as the boys' collective impulse towards complete savagery grows stronger, the parallels between human and animal intensify. In Chapter Seven, as several of the boys are hunting the beast, they repeat the ritual with Robert as a stand-in for the pig; this time, however, they get consumed by a kind of "frenzy" and come close to actually killing him. In the same scene, Jack jokes that if they do not kill a pig next time, they can kill a littlun in its place. The repeated substitution of boy for pig in the childrens' ritual games, and in their conversation, calls attention to the consequences of their self-gratifying behavior: concerned only with their own base desires, the boys have become unable to see each other as anything more than objects subject to their individual wills. The more pigs the boys kill, the easier it becomes for them to harm and kill each other. Mistreating the pigs facilitates this process of dehumanization.

The early episodes in which boys are substituted for pigs, either verbally or in the hunting dance, also foreshadow the tragic events of the novel's later chapters, notably the murders of Simon and Piggy and the attempt on Ralph's life. Simon, a character who from the outset of the novel is associated with the natural landscape he has an affinity for, is murdered when the other children mistake him for "the beast"-a mythical inhuman creature that serves as an outlet for the children's fear and sadness. Piggy's name links him symbolically to the wild pigs on the island, the immediate target for Jack's violent impulses; from the outset, when the other boys refuse to call him anything but "Piggy," Golding establishes the character as one whose humanity is, in the eyes of the other boys, ambiguous. The murders of Simon and Piggy demonstrate the boys' complete descent into savagery. Both literally (Simon) and symbolically (Piggy), the boys have become indistinguishable from the animals that they stalk and kill.

The Loss of Innocence

At the end of Lord of the Flies , Ralph weeps "for the end of innocence," a lament that retroactively makes explicit one of the novel's major concerns, namely, the loss of innocence. When the boys are first deserted on the island, they behave like children, alternating between enjoying their freedom and expressing profound homesickness and fear. By the end of the novel, however, they mirror the warlike behavior of the adults of the Home Counties: they attack, torture, and even murder one another without hesitation or regret. The loss of the boys' innocence on the island runs parallel to, and informs their descent into savagery, and it recalls the Bible's narrative of the Fall of Man from paradise.

Accordingly, the island is coded in the early chapters as a kind of paradise, with idyllic scenery, fresh fruit, and glorious weather. Yet, as in the Biblical Eden, the temptation toward corruption is present: the younger boys fear a "snake-thing." The "snake-thing" is the earliest incarnation of the "beast" that, eventually, will provoke paranoia and division among the group. It also explicitly recalls the snake from the Garden of Eden, the embodiment of Satan who causes Adam and Eve's fall from grace. The boys' increasing belief in the beast indicates their gradual loss of innocence, a descent that culminates in tragedy. We may also note that the landscape of the island itself shifts from an Edenic space to a hellish one, as marked by Ralph's observation of the ocean tide as an impenetrable wall, and by the storm that follows Simon's murder.

The forest glade that Simon retreats to in Chapter Three is another example of how the boys' loss of innocence is registered on the natural landscape of the island. Simon first appreciates the clearing as peaceful and beautiful, but when he returns, he finds The Lord of the Flies impaled at its center, a powerful symbol of how the innocence of childhood has been corrupted by fear and savagery.

Even the most sympathetic boys develop along a character arc that traces a fall from innocence (or, as we might euphemize, a journey into maturity). When Ralph is first introduced, he is acting like a child, splashing in the water, mocking Piggy, and laughing. He tells Piggy that he is certain that his father, a naval commander, will rescue him, a conviction that the reader understands as the wishful thinking of a little boy. Ralph repeats his belief in their rescue throughout the novel, shifting his hope that his own father will discover them to the far more realistic premise that a passing ship will be attracted by the signal fire on the island. By the end of the novel, he has lost hope in the boys' rescue altogether. The progression of Ralph's character from idealism to pessimistic realism expresses the extent to which life on the island has eradicated his childhood.

The Negative Consequences of War

In addition to its other resonances, Lord of the Flies is in part an allegory of the Cold War. Thus, it is deeply concerned with the negative effects of war on individuals and for social relationships. Composed during the Cold War, the novel's action unfolds from a hypothetical atomic war between England and "the Reds," which was a clear word for communists. Golding thus presents the non-violent tensions that were unfolding during the 1950s as culminating into a fatal conflict-a narrative strategy that establishes the novel as a cautionary tale against the dangers of ideological, or "cold," warfare, becoming hot. Moreover, we may understand the conflict among the boys on the island as a reflection of the conflict between the democratic powers of the West and the communist presence throughout China, Eastern Europe, and the Soviet Union. (China's cultural revolution had not yet occurred, but its communist revolution was fresh in Western memory.) Ralph, an embodiment of democracy, clashes tragically with Jack, a character who represents a style of military dictatorship similar to the West's perception of communist leaders such as Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong. Dressed in a black cape and cap, with flaming red hair, Jack also visually evokes the "Reds" in the fictional world of the novel and the historical U.S.S.R., whose signature colors were red and black. As the tension between the boys comes to a bloody head, the reader sees the dangerous consequences of ideological conflict.

The arrival of the naval officer at the conclusion of the narrative underscores these allegorical points. The officer embodies war and militaristic thinking, and as such, he is symbolically linked to the brutal Jack. The officer is also English and thus linked to the democratic side of the Cold War, which the novel vehemently defends. The implications of the officer's presence are provocative: Golding suggests that even a war waged in the name of civilization can reduce humanity to a state of barbarism. The ultimate scene of the novel, in which the boys weep with grief for the loss of their innocence, implicates contemporary readers in the boys' tragedy. The boys are representatives, however immature and untutored, of the wartime impulses of the period.

Lord of the Flies Questions and Answers

The Question and Answer section for Lord of the Flies is a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss the novel.

How do the boys respond to Jack's call for Ralph's removal as chief? How does Jack react? Respond with evidence from the text.

There is a lot of immaturity here. The other boys refuse to vote Ralph out of power. Enraged, Jack has a tantrum and runs away from the group, saying that he is leaving and that anyone who likes is welcome to join him.The boys don't like the open...

What does Ralph recall hearing From Simon and seeing in the sky ?

The boys would see cargo planes in the sky and fishing boats in the sea.

Wooden huts on or near the beach are not called……

I'm not sure what you are looking for here, perhaps "shelters".

Study Guide for Lord of the Flies

Lord of the Flies study guide contains a biography of William Golding, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.

• About Lord of the Flies
• Lord of the Flies Summary
• Lord of the Flies Video
• Character List

Essays for Lord of the Flies

Lord of the Flies essays are academic essays for citation. These papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of Lord of the Flies by William Golding.

• Two Faces of Man
• The Relationship Between Symbolism and Theme in Lord of the Flies
• A Tainted View of Society
• Death and Social Collapse in Lord of the Flies
• Lumination: The Conquest of Mankind's Darkness

Lesson Plan for Lord of the Flies

• About the Author
• Study Objectives
• Common Core Standards
• Introduction to Lord of the Flies
• Relationship to Other Books
• Bringing in Technology
• Notes to the Teacher
• Related Links
• Lord of the Flies Bibliography

Wikipedia Entries for Lord of the Flies

• Introduction

Civilization Vs Savagery In Lord Of The Flies Analysis

The Lord of The Flies is a novel written by William Golding. The novel is based in the 1950s and tells the story of a group of young boys who find themselves on a deserted island. They establish rules and a system of organization, but without any adults on the island to serve as a civilizing authority, the young boys ultimately become savage and violent. Golding incorporates a number of themes throughout the novel like savagery vs civilization, this theme changes throughout the whole novel from beginning to end. At the beginning of the novel, the boys set up a democratic society to maintain order, in the middle the boys start to abandon their democratic society and their behavior becomes increasingly savage, fearful, and violent. 

At the beginning of Lord of The Flies, the boys set up rules and a system of organization. They elected Ralph as their leader and used the conch that was found at the beach to call the boys to come together for meetings on page 20 Piggy states “We can use this to call others. Have a meeting. They’ll come when they hear us” (Golding). The group of young boys also had built shelters and displayed concern for the youngest among them which shows that they are using their knowledge from back home to start a civilized community. Piggy’s glasses also play a big part in creating a civilized community because they are a symbol of survival and knowledge. The glasses created the signal fire which was used for the group’s survival, however, Jack gets frustrated when he gets blamed for letting the signal fire go out so he takes it out on Piggy, breaking piggy’s glasses. This act of assault symbolizes savagery, and the broken glasses symbolize the loss of intellectual thought on the island as things begin to fall apart.

In the middle of Lord of the Flies, The theme of civilization vs savagery becomes evident as Jack’s thirst for blood becomes apparent in chapter 4 when he is excited that they have killed a pig (Golding 97). Since this is Jack’s first time killing a pig his mind becomes obsessed with savage thoughts which lead the rest of the boys’ to lose civilization and become savage. The rest of the boys’show savagery behavior in chapter 9 when they kill Simon because he believed that the best was not real and that the“best” was a dead man wrapping in a parachute Jack and the others do not believe him and think that Simon is the best so they kill him ( Golding 219). Jack is one of the main reasons for the downfall of the boys’ civilization throughout the novel he tries to hide his true identity of being a civilized young boy with the identity of a savage and violent young boy. On page 89, Golding states, “Jack planned his new face he made one cheek and one eye socket white, then rubbed red over the other half of his face” (Golding). This mask, that Jack is creating replaces his true civilized face with a savagery one. 

At the end of the Lord Of The Flies, civilization is not restored due to the death of piggy preventing the revival of civilization. On page 290, Golding states, “Ralph wept for the end of innocence, the darkness of man’s heart, and the fall through the air of the true, wise friend called piggy” (Golding). The civilized boys would not be the same and the thought of going back to who they once were seems very unlikely to happen. However, there is still hope as the boys go back to being civilized English boys after they meet the officer. Jack started to cry as he remembers that they are children and not savages, “The tears began to flow and sobs shook him” (Golding 290). 

All in all, Williams Golding’s novel Lord Of The Flies features many themes that change throughout the story from beginning to end, however, the most prominent theme that changes throughout the story from beginning to end is civilization Vs savagery. The characters Ralph and piggy represent civilization while jack represents savagery. Ralph tries to do whatever he can to create a civilized society and keep the group calm, while Jack continues to change the boys’ minds into cruelty and savagery. The Conch and piggy’s glasses symbolize the peace between civilization and savagery, however, when both are broken things take a turn for the worst, and savagery ultimately savagery wins over civilization. The importance of the theme civilization vs savagery that Golding was trying to prove or get at is that there is no such thing as a perfect society which means that civilization will always become savagery at a certain point.

Related Samples

• An Analysis of an Ideal Society in Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut
• Character Creon in Sophocles' play Antigone
• They Both Die at the End by Adam Silvera Book Review
• Magpie Murders by Anthony Horowitz Analysis Essay Example
• Animal Farm by George Orwell Analysis
• The Pigs' Quest for Control in Animal Farm by George Orwell
• Slowly, Slowly in the Wind by Patricia Highsmith Book Review
• Ducks Symbolism in The Catcher in the Rye Essay Example
• Atticus is a Teacher in To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee
• Relationship of Othello and Desdemona Essay Example

Didn't find the perfect sample?

You can order a custom paper by our expert writers

Lord of the Flies

William golding, ask litcharts ai: the answer to your questions.

The " beast " is a symbol Golding uses to represent the savage impulses lying deep within every human being. Civilization exists to suppress the beast. By keeping the natural human desire for power and violence to a minimum, civilization forces people to act responsibly and rationally, as boys like Piggy and Ralph do in Lord in the Flies . Savagery arises when civilization stops suppressing the beast: it's the beast unleashed. Savages not only acknowledge the beast, they thrive on it and worship it like a god. As Jack and his tribe become savages, they begin to believe the beast exists physically—they even leave it offerings to win its favor to ensure their protection. Civilization forces people to hide from their darkest impulses, to suppress them. Savages surrender to their darkest impulses, which they attribute to the demands of gods who require their obedience.

Savagery and the "Beast" ThemeTracker

Savagery and the "Beast" Quotes in Lord of the Flies

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser or activate Google Chrome Frame to improve your experience.

Civilization vs Savagery: LoTF Essay by Ariana Flores

What makes an individual or a culture uncivilized? Some people may say lack of order, while others could say not socially advanced. However, what does someone consider to be savage? Stripping families from their home lands? Not allowing the conservation of one's culture? Physically abusing others? They all can be seen as unacceptable acts by those in the “civilized” world, and yet they are all acts that were perpetrated by supposedly “civilized” colonists as they [describe what they did]. However, killing for no reason and screaming threatening chants are no great deeds either. Readers of Lord of the Flies by William Golding, view the boys on the island the same way colonists view the “savages” they colonized.

In the scene where the boys on the island portray the killing of a pig, the “beast” emerges from the forest. This beast is no beast at all, but fear disguising Simon as a monster. "At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt onto the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore. There were no words, no movements but the tearing of the teeth and claws (153)."  Here, the reenactment has turned into an execution of the "beast". The boys do not try to make peaceful contact or communication with the foreign living being in front of them. The vulnerability of the "beast" as it comes out of the forest is not taken into account by the boys, that maybe the "beast" has feelings and is scared. The adjectives get more intense as the scene goes on, using words like demented, dark, blind, urgent, unbearable. The intensity of the adjectives reaches a climax right before the “beast” is killed and when the boys turn into animals. Their fear blinded their better judgment, and enabled them to look further than the rumors of the beast. This caused them to kill one of their own, who was on his way to them to clear the air about the suspicions of the beast in the first place.

This behavior in the novel also happens in the real world. European pioneers encountered Native Americans, and much like the boys on the island killing the beast, almost destroyed all of the Native Americans. “[...],European conquest shattered many Native communities through forced relocation, warfare, broken treaties and foreign-brought diseases. Most Native communities were completely wiped out,” says Indian Youth.org. Europeans came into a new territory, claiming it as their own without thinking of the lives already present there. With this mindset, they did everything in their power to get rid of anyone who didn't look like them or embrace their culture while degrading them in the process.

Savage was a term used to describe the Native Americans. It is a word that was also incorporated into Lord of the Flies. In this scene, Ralph is furiously trying to avoid being caught by Jack’s tribe. “A smallish savage was standing between him and the rest of the forest, a savage striped red and white, and carrying a spear (195).” This depiction of a feral, small mammal of some sort is a complete one eighty compared to the seemingly innocent boys who crash landed on the island. Jack’s society has turned into a group of boys who smear the blood of animals on their faces, kill for sport, and who kill anyone who doesn’t agree with their ways. In other words, being brought up civilized does not mean that children stay civilized without the guidance of an adult at an age where they're malleable. The “savage” nature will be forced away when the children would be brought back to society. However, the after effects would still be traumatic and possibly cause the children to question what's right and what's wrong after Roger mercilessly killed Piggy in front of many witnesses, who did not necessarily protest, because Piggy did not agree with the conceptions of the new tribe under the leadership of Jack.

This representation of a savage correlates with the European perspective of Native Americans. National Humanities Center.org encourages students to watch 1990 Academy Award winner, Dances with Wolves as opposed to 1992 adaption of James Fenimore Cooper’s 1826 novel Last of the Mohicans . The novel was based on the earliest meetings of Europeans and Native Americans. “ Besides a sympathetic white hero in line with Cooper’s own Natty Bumppo, it starkly contrasts “good” Indians (the ever-so-noble Lakotas) and “bad” Indians (the villainous Pawnees, with their roach-cuts and face paint making them look like English “punks” on a rampage).” The painting of faces, and spears are something commonly associated with the “savage”/ “bad” Indians. Familiarity struck with this portrayal, which fit the description of Jack’s tribe. However, the Iroquois Confederacy is what the current Democratic Republic is based off of here in the United States. European philosophical ideas that Locke and Rousseau published were established from Native American ideas. The Europeans called Native Americans savages while they were the ones who published Native Americans ideals, captured Native American land, and took Native American lives?

Overall, biased information can change lives. Decisions based on prejudice won’t necessarily benefit the human race as a whole. Claiming things that aren’t your own, also does not benefit one or more groups in the situation. This is something learned since childhood. However, sometimes it takes people a long time to learn one lesson, and they often have to learn it the hard way.

Works Cited

Golding, William. Lord of the Flies . New York: Penguin, 2006. Print.

Dippie, Brian W. "American Indians: The Image of the Indian, Nature Transformed, TeacherServe®, National Humanities Center." American Indians: The Image of the Indian, Nature Transformed, TeacherServe®, National Humanities Center . National Humanities Center, May 2008. Web. 31 Mar. 2017. < http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/nattrans/ntecoindian/essays/indimage.htm >

"Chp 4: Ennobling `Savages', Native America in European natural-rights philosophy, "Exemplar Of Liberty"." Chp 4: Ennobling `Savages', Native America in European natural-rights philosophy, "Exemplar Of Liberty" . N.p., n.d. Web. 31 Mar. 2017. < https://ratical.org/many_worlds/6Nations/EoL/chp4.html >

"Traditions & Culture." Traditions & Culture | Running Strong . N.p., 2014. Web. 31 Mar. 2017. < http://indianyouth.org/american-indian-life/traditions-culture >

Comments (2)

I think your work did a good job portraying the human ability to portray others as savages. It was interesting to see the comparisons between a reader's perspective of the boys from Lord of the Flies and a colonist's perspective of the Native Americans. Another really good real-life example of this comes in European colonization of Africa during the 18th and 19th centuries. Not only were Europeans taking away a lot of native culture, they also portrayed the African people as primitive and savage. This became part of writing and art. Even some of the most innocent works of the time, like Tintin or Babar, would feature stereotyped "savages". It's an interesting look into how media like books influence public understanding, which you discussed with your "Last of the Mohicans" example.

• Yes, it convinced me that readers view the boys as savage just as the colonists viewed the Native Americans as savage.
• You mentioned that our form of government is based off of the Iroquois Confederacy in order to point out the hypocrisy of the situation. Another way this connects is how the boys on the island vote and select a leader. This shows their civility and the connection to the adopted governmental system.

Log in to post a comment.

You can also log in with your email address.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Civilazation versus Savagery in The Lord of the Flies

2019, Civilazation versus Savagery in The Lord of the Flies

it is an essay on Civilazation versus Savagery in The Lord of the Flies

Related Papers

William max

The novel “Lord of the Flies” was written by William Golding prior to World War II. Ideally, the novel outlines a story of 12 boys who got stranded in uninhabited Island when their airplane crashed. This assignment focuses on symbolism that the author applies to reveal or bring out his message in the novel. The story involves several characters. The characters described on this assignment include Ralph (democratic and civilized leader), Jackson (dictatorial leader), Piggy (a vulnerable character), Simon (a saint and a Christ-like character), and Samneric (identical twins most referred to as ‘bigguns’). Typically, the thesis is divided into four main parts which include the introduction, literature review, analysis, and conclusion. Noticeably, the objective of this assignment is to describe the extent to which William Golding applies symbolism in the novel “Lord of the Flies”. Towards this end, the paper focuses on five inanimate objects or symbols that Golding uses to bring his message to the readers. The five main symbols discussed include the conch shell which a symbol of power and authority, the lord of the flies which is the most valuable symbol in the novel, and the beast which is a symbol for instinct of aggressiveness and violence among humankind. The two other symbols include the signal fire which signifies the call for ships to come to the rescue of the stranded boys, and Piggy glasses which symbolize human intellect and innovations due to the development of science. However, some themes come up while analyzing symbolism in this novel. These themes include loss of innocence, civilization versus violence, and pessimism. Nevertheless, symbolism is used in several instances but this assignment concentrates only on the five inanimate objects aforementioned.

merna Nashat

Cristian Bejinaru

Erishell Amato

Eliana Ionoaia

This research study is an attempt to assessthematically the underlying ideas implied by the novel Lordof the Flies. The novel realistically reflects the social and cultural human conditions of the contemporary time. Itrevolves around the idea of the evil inherent specifically in human andin society at large. The author is of the view that man by nature is evil. It is the cult of civilization which thwarts that evil from emerging. In addition to, the author has interwoven a variety of thematic interests including, the emergence of evil, loss of civilization, the motif of power, the fate of the intellectual, the uncertainty of life, symbolic manifestations and the essence of pessimism. KEYWORDS: Golding, Lord, Flies, Evil, Thematic, Evaluation, Civilization, Motif

Daniyal Wali

The characters in Lord of the Flies possess recognizable symbolic significance, which make them as the sort of people around us. Ralph stands for civilization and democracy; Piggy represents intellect and rationalism; Jack signifies savagery and dictatorship; Simon is the incarnation of goodness and saintliness. All of these efficiently portray the microcosm of that society.

Ayansola Ibukun

Sylvia Opoku Fofie

This paper is a literary analysis of Golding's novel Lord of the Flies using Paul De Man's approach to deconstruction which is a means to literary criticism. Using a Christian context, the paper examines how events and some characters in Lord of the Flies fit into the Bible.

Mustafa Akyüz

Lord of the Flies (1954) is truly one of the most important works that illustrates the relationship between humankind and politics in the English literature. In the story, we witness a group of boys that have survived from a plain-wreck, finding themselves in a solitary island which has no sign of civilization. The situation puts forth interesting questions about how the boys will react to this isolated environment. “The isolated island provides an appropriate stage for the survival story of the deserted boys, but also suggests a universal, timeless backdrop for symbolic action.” (Dickson, 1990)In the socio-political philosophies, there had been many important and grandly influential works written that enables us to answer these questions surrounding Golding’s island. In this field of philosophy, the attempt is to establish a set of written and unwritten rules that each member of the society sacrifices a portion of their liberty into responsibility, which would in turn benefit all of the society.What these philosophers were trying to craft was a co-operative society, which had divided it’s order of power within it’s instututions. They were trying to establish healthy working organs for their society which represented and consecrated to the ultimate power. In Golding’s story the boys are left to answer these questions and have to co-operate in order to survive. This aspect of the novel makes it a unique allegory of the theories that has been debated on this subject.

RELATED PAPERS

Mohammad Deyab

International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies

International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies

Golam Rabbani

SMART M O V E S J O U R N A L IJELLH

DrIman Hanafy

Juan Carlos Saravia , Jose Roberto Saravia

Shyaonti Talwar

Structures of the World; Human Rights and Equality through Archetypes in Lord of the Flies

Umut Barutlu

Natasha Vicente da Silveira Costa

Eric Wilson

Amanda Studebaker

olukayode F oyenuga

irLIT2016 Conf. , Homa Pourkaramali

critique: studies in contemporary fiction

MIYANAGA Ryuichiro

Violence surpassing innocence in Lord Of The Flies by William Golding and The Bloody Chamber by Angela Carter

Filipe Barbosa

Makki, M. (2010). ELABORATING ON THE BIBLICAL ALLEGORIES OF THE NOVEL, LORD OF THE FLIES. The Tenth International Language, Literature and Stylistics Symposium, Ankara, Turkey, Gazi University.

Mohammad Makki

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Navigating the Wilderness of Humanity: Insights from the ‘Lord of the Flies’ Movie

This essay offers a compelling examination of the film adaptations of William Golding’s ‘Lord of the Flies’, delving deep into the narrative’s exploration of human nature and societal breakdown. It highlights how the film portrays the transformation of a group of marooned boys from civilized individuals to embodiments of primal instincts, emphasizing the conflict between order and chaos. The essay discusses the film’s use of symbolism and powerful cinematography to amplify themes of morality, leadership, and the innate propensity for savagery within humans. It underscores the portrayal of leadership struggles, the corrupting influence of power, and the haunting realization of the ‘beast’ within. The piece reflects on how ‘Lord of the Flies’ serves not just as a tale of survival but as a profound commentary on the fragility of civilization and the dark undercurrents of the human psyche. Additionally, PapersOwl presents more free essays samples linked to Lord Of The Flies.

How it works

The cinematic adaptation of William Golding’s ‘Lord of the Flies’ is much more than a mere survival narrative; it’s a profound exploration of the human psyche under the duress of societal collapse. Released in 1963 and later remade in 1990, the film translates the raw intensity and the nuanced undercurrents of Golding’s novel onto the screen, offering viewers a stark glimpse into the darkness and complexity of human nature.

From the opening scenes, the movie plunges its audience into a disturbingly idyllic setting: a deserted island, initially a picture of paradise, soon to become a stage for chaos and moral disintegration.

The story unfolds around a group of boys marooned on this island, away from the confines and constructs of society. The initial joy of freedom quickly spirals into a harrowing saga of survival, power struggles, and the eventual disintegration of order and civility.

The film’s power lies in its raw and unflinching portrayal of this descent. The characters, initially bound by the common goal of survival, gradually succumb to their primal instincts. The conch shell, a symbol of order and civilization, loses its influence as the veneer of societal norms fades, revealing the unsettling truth about human nature’s inherent duality. The transformation of characters, especially that of Ralph, Jack, and Piggy, is portrayed with an intensity that resonates with the viewer, forcing one to confront uncomfortable questions about morality, leadership, and the innate propensity for savagery.

The directors of both film adaptations, Peter Brook (1963) and Harry Hook (1990), use the visual medium to amplify themes present in Golding’s text. The starkness of the black and white film in Brook’s version adds a layer of grim reality, while Hook’s use of color in the latter adaptation highlights the stark contrast between the lushness of the surroundings and the dark events unfolding within it. The cinematography, focusing on the hauntingly beautiful yet increasingly menacing landscape, mirrors the internal tumult and deterioration of the boys’ societal structure.

Perhaps one of the most compelling aspects of the film is its exploration of leadership and power dynamics. The rivalry between Ralph, the embodiment of order and democracy, and Jack, who represents anarchy and tyranny, is a microcosm of larger societal conflicts. This power struggle, underlined by the haunting use of symbolism such as Piggy’s glasses or the ominous ‘Lord of the Flies’, adds a layer of depth to the narrative, making it a study of power and its corrupting influence.

Moreover, the film does not just depict the breakdown of civilization; it also offers a commentary on the nature of evil and the concept of innocence. The chilling realization that the ‘beast’ the boys fear is nothing but a manifestation of their own inner darkness is a profound commentary on human nature. The innocence of the children, juxtaposed with their capability for unspeakable cruelty, poses unsettling questions about the inherent goodness of humanity.

In conclusion, the ‘Lord of the Flies’ movie is a compelling cinematic venture that delves deep into the complexities of human nature. It’s a narrative that doesn’t merely narrate a tale of survival but forces viewers to confront the unsettling aspects of human nature and society. The haunting imagery, powerful performances, and the underlying philosophical questions make the film an enduring piece of cinematic art. It serves as a mirror, reflecting the inherent chaos and order within each individual, reminding us of the fragile veneer of civilization that separates order from chaos, civility from savagery.

Cite this page

Navigating the Wilderness of Humanity: Insights from the 'Lord of the Flies' Movie. (2024, Jan 26). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/navigating-the-wilderness-of-humanity-insights-from-the-lord-of-the-flies-movie/

"Navigating the Wilderness of Humanity: Insights from the 'Lord of the Flies' Movie." PapersOwl.com , 26 Jan 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/navigating-the-wilderness-of-humanity-insights-from-the-lord-of-the-flies-movie/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Navigating the Wilderness of Humanity: Insights from the 'Lord of the Flies' Movie . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/navigating-the-wilderness-of-humanity-insights-from-the-lord-of-the-flies-movie/ [Accessed: 17 Apr. 2024]

"Navigating the Wilderness of Humanity: Insights from the 'Lord of the Flies' Movie." PapersOwl.com, Jan 26, 2024. Accessed April 17, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/navigating-the-wilderness-of-humanity-insights-from-the-lord-of-the-flies-movie/

"Navigating the Wilderness of Humanity: Insights from the 'Lord of the Flies' Movie," PapersOwl.com , 26-Jan-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/navigating-the-wilderness-of-humanity-insights-from-the-lord-of-the-flies-movie/. [Accessed: 17-Apr-2024]

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Navigating the Wilderness of Humanity: Insights from the 'Lord of the Flies' Movie . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/navigating-the-wilderness-of-humanity-insights-from-the-lord-of-the-flies-movie/ [Accessed: 17-Apr-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

Home — Essay Samples — Literature — Lord of The Flies — Theme Of Savagery Versus Civilization In Lord Of The Flies

Theme of Savagery Versus Civilization in Lord of The Flies

• Categories: Lord of The Flies William Golding

About this sample

Words: 2255 |

12 min read

Published: Feb 8, 2022

Words: 2255 | Pages: 5 | 12 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Literature

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 435 words

4 pages / 1849 words

4 pages / 1989 words

6.5 pages / 3030 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Lord of The Flies

In William Golding's classic novel, Lord of the Flies, Piggy's glasses serve as a powerful symbol that conveys deeper meanings and themes within the story. While Piggy himself represents reason, intelligence, and civilization in [...]

William Golding's novel Lord of the Flies is a literary masterpiece that delves into the psyche of human beings and the horrors of society. One of the significant features of this novel is the presence of the littluns, who are [...]

Fire symbolism in Lord of the Flies has been a topic of much debate and analysis since the novel was first published in 1954. In this essay, we will explore the significance of fire in the novel and how it is used to represent [...]

Lord of the Flies by William Golding is a novel that has been studied by students and scholars alike for its intricate portrayal of human nature. The novel is set on a deserted island where a group of boys are left to fend for [...]

Did the role of gender have any influence on the actions in the well known novel the Lord of the Flies? Would things have turned out differently if it was all girls stranded on the island, instead of all boys? Gender criticism [...]

Leadership is directing a group of people to work together towards a common goal while assuring nobody's fundamental human rights are taken away from them. While reading Lord of the Flies, many teachers and historians argue if [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

• Free Samples
• Premium Essays
• Editing Services Editing Proofreading Rewriting
• Extra Tools Essay Topic Generator Thesis Generator Citation Generator GPA Calculator Study Guides Donate Paper
• Essay Writing Help
• About Us About Us Testimonials FAQ
• Studentshare
• Lord of the Flies: Civilization vs. Savagery

Lord of the Flies: Civilization vs. Savagery - Essay Example

• Subject: Literature
• Type: Essay
• Level: Masters
• Pages: 6 (1500 words)
• Downloads: 3
• Author: zhegmann

Extract of sample "Lord of the Flies: Civilization vs. Savagery"

• Cited: 0 times
• Copy Citation Citation is copied Copy Citation Citation is copied Copy Citation Citation is copied

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Lord of the Flies: Civilization vs. Savagery

Piggys presence in the lord of the flies, struggle of human nature in the lord of the flies, lord of the flies analysis, lord of the flies by william golding, the lord of the flies, the lord of flies, by william golding, what does lord of the flies teach us about governance.

• TERMS & CONDITIONS
• PRIVACY POLICY
• COOKIES POLICY