Dignity ignored due to the fear of infectious diseases
Participants felt fear and anxiety while caring for COVID-19 patients, as they have remained unaware of any definitive treatments. Consumed by thoughts of contracting the disease, they reported feeling unable to remain calm and dutifully serve their patients. In particular, it was shocking, as well as saddening, for them to be unable to provide respectful end of life care toward patients who could not recover.
The anxiety and fear at the heart of the thought that they could also be infected became an invisible chain, binding the participants. According to them, nursing without being guaranteed safety was challenging. When facing the reality of nursing while fearing patients’ diseases, it felt unfamiliar for participants to worry about their own and their patients’ safety simultaneously, rather than completely immersing themselves in patients’ recovery. They were uncertain of whether their feelings were normal; although they tried their best to provide quality care, they found it challenging to do so while dealing with their persistent anxiety.
To be honest, that was the hardest for me. Since we were constantly exposed to the risk of infection, it was hard to care for patients due to anxiety rather than due to physical challenges while caring for the patient. (Participant J)
Having to watch patients struggling alone and in isolation, without the support and comfort of their family members during their final moments, made participants feel extremely sorry and heartbroken. The most distressing aspect of caring for patients on their deathbed was that patients and nurses were faced with the reality that patients’ families would not be allowed to be with them during their moment of dying; the fact that they would pass away without receiving appropriate treatment was secondary. “Patients who died during the COVID-19 period were the most pitiful” does not just indicate the limitations of medical treatment. It highlights dignity, which is be protected even in the worst circumstances, but was disregarded due to the fear of contracting infectious diseases. Participants experienced unimaginable shock and ethical anguish as they witnessed patients being taken to crematoriums without being seen by their family members, with their bodies in bags without having their clothing changed. As these uncontrollable experiences kept repeating, participants made a paradoxical resolve to prevent patients from dying.
Patients who die while I work in the ward usually have their families come to see them and hold their hands. However, for those who die of COVID-19, families come and check their patients on the monitor. I think that’s the most heartbreaking and sad thing. (Participant L)
The post-death process was really shocking. I feel like it didn’t treat people like human beings. Thus, that hurt me the most. I think that’s hard while working in the ward. When patients die, I know how they will be treated. I am so sorry, and my heart hurts. That’s why I really want to discharge them. Seriously, I think I’m getting desperate for this kind of feeling. (Participant B)
Participants struggled every day, and factors that made their lives more challenging are as follows: the personal protective equipment (PPE) that had to be worn for patient care, working in chaotic conditions without clear instructions, and being overburdened with tasks.
Participants had to endure a significant amount of pain and discomfort for safety purposes, especially while nursing patients in PPE. Less than 10 min after wearing them, the inside of the protective clothing would become warm and fill with sweat, and the eye goggles would become foggy. In these situations, participants experienced difficulties in certain activities, such as communicating with patients, securing intravenous (IV) lines, or drawing blood. Occasionally, they had to wear gloves that did not fit well due to a lack of proper supplies, making their practice more difficult.
I think the hardest thing was to wear Level D and go inside. At first, I did the intubation wearing protective clothing. At that time, my body became sluggish, and my vision became narrower because I was wearing goggles. So, even if I moved a little, it got too hot and I would sweat too much, and it was really hard to deal with something in there. Because it was too hot. (Participant D)
To prevent the spread of COVID-19, hospitals implemented policies to minimize the number of family members and caregivers in contact with patients, which increased the burden of caregiving on participants. Blood collections and portable X-ray imaging that radiological technologists performed also became nurses’ duties. In addition, nurses had to prepare documents for the hospital transfers of patients, and were also responsible for checking, storing, and delivering parcels to patients. Nurses were gradually exhausted as most duties, especially those outside their purview, were delegated to them.
To be honest, there are not just nurses in the hospital. However, it’s a situation where we have to take on everything that other employees have done. I feel like they’re giving all their work to the nurses. We have to prepare everything that the radiology department had to do on their own before. For the meal distribution for COVID-19 patients, nurses have to do everything that the nutrition team previously did. For blood collection, we have to do all the things that the laboratory medicine department used to do. It’s overwhelming that nurses have to do most of the work. (Participant F)
Participants’ routine caring for COVID-19 patients has been as uncertain as COVID-19 patients’ conditions. Due to the number of confirmed cases increasing daily and sudden confirmations of the infection in colleagues, situations such as the operation of additional negative pressure wards or temporary closures of wards occurred unexpectedly. Consequently, participants were frequently relocated, and their work schedules and wards were changed, creating confusion. In particular, unclear guidelines and insufficient training made their jobs more difficult.
It’s tough to get the work schedule on a weekly basis. Actually, I don’t know my work schedule for Tuesday even on Monday, so I don’t know which shift I will work on the next day. Hence, it’s really very stressful. (Participant E)
Participants experienced not only physical difficulties but also mental and social challenges while caring for COVID-19 patients. They endured self-isolation along with their families, and were uncomfortable with causing their family members to experience isolation. In addition, unlike the usual positive public perception of nurses, participants felt a social disconnection from the negativity and stigma surrounding them, which was also hurtful and uncomfortable.
Participants contracted the virus while caring for patients or had to enter complete self-isolation due to coming in contact with infected colleagues. They endured the anxiety and fear of being infected and suddenly became subjects of self-isolation, leading to concerns about having their personal information exposed, and the social stigma of being confirmed COVID-19 patients. Those who tested negative felt “uncomfortable relief”, even as their colleagues were testing positive during self-isolation.
When being in self-isolation, as you know, I must contact my child’s school. I had to contact a homeroom teacher of my child. Actually I didn’t really do anything wrong, but I really, really felt bad. Wouldn’t the image appear strange to my child? Because of that thought, every time I thought about that, I thought if I should resign. (Participant N)
Even with the “Thank you Challenge” campaign spreading among the public, to express gratitude and respect towards health care professionals who responded to COVID-19, nurses did not feel particularly gratified. In a pandemic, the true heroes fighting COVID-19 could only work efficiently in isolation from other people. Close neighbors viewed participants as dangerous sources of pollution or pathogens that threatened their safety. Unlike the warm gaze of the public to see the nurses, participants felt judged by those around them, which made their jobs more uncomfortable.
Above all, the most challenging thing is the social perspective of “these people are working in an isolation hospital now”. People close to me have this kind of perspective… When one of the nurses is reported on the news or the media as a confirmed patient, we also feel like cringing. Such social perspectives were very hard for us because we’ve become people that the public wants to avoid rather them feeling appreciation for us and thinking of us like we are working hard and trying our best. (Participant M)
Sympathetic colleagues, and supportive and appreciative patients, encouraged participants to care for patients despite their difficulties. In addition, participants felt rewarded and proud of their care when they witnessed patients recovering, which further drove them to fulfill their duties.
Participants endured difficult working routines with the support of colleagues, who best understood their struggles. In experiencing and sharing the same difficulties, participants found comfort with their colleagues. As nurses cannot quit, as that would mean additional pressures for their colleagues, they rely on each other for support.
To be honest, I think I’m being able to endure hard times thanks to my companionship. It’s hard for us all. And fortunately, all colleagues are friendly, and many colleagues are so considerate of each other. We’re not pushing each other to go in, but we are voluntarily working. Even though COVID-19 is hard for me, this companionship has helped me learn and endure with them until now. (Participant I)
While struggling, words of support and appreciation from patients, family, and friends helped participants withstand their difficult situations.
A patient wrote a very long letter. “Thank you. Thank you so much for taking care of me, and I was moved by the hard work you did. And even in the heat, you never got annoyed”. Well, because the patient wrote a lot of appreciative words like this, I was really grateful. Somehow, apart from the money, I thought it was terrific to work. (Participant A)
The sense of satisfaction and self-esteem felt while caring for COVID-19 patients became an essential incentive for participants to remain in nursing. When patients hospitalized in severe conditions were able to recover, participants felt rewarded by their occupation, and their self-esteem was increased.
At first, the patient‘s condition was so bad. So, we thought the patient would actually die, but it turned out that the patient improved so much and was discharged later. We felt like we were being compensated for the hard work. I had pride that we did an excellent job in nursing. (Participant D)
As COVID-19 keeps persisting in everyday life, expectations for life after COVID-19 are gradually blurring. Participants are unsure if there will ever be a time when they can care for their patients without protective clothing. Much of what participants wanted to accomplish after COVID-19 has been delayed for at least a year, but they have some expectations and are preparing for another future.
Even in the current uncertain situation, participants have sincerely performed their nursing duties, while dreaming of restoring daily life. They recognized the importance of everyday social activities, such as eating together, watching movies, capturing bright smiles on camera, and realized that these activities were all they wished to do. Conversely, along with these wishes, there are also concerns about being able to return to the past sense of normalcy.
Returning to normality is what I want the most, and I think the next step is to think about it together with the management team and the government. I believe our request should be reviewed to combat physical exhaustion, and psychotherapists need to be involved and actively work on recovering. It’s not just that we get rest. Professional intervention is necessary. (Participant M)
Participants encountered COVID-19, which occurred several years after the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) epidemic, as another infectious disease that was able to threaten society at any time. In addition, chaotic situations in the hospital were not promptly managed, as the effects of the virus were so severe and fast that the experience of nursing MERS patients became insignificant. The MERS experience was inadequate in training healthcare providers to respond to similar future emergencies. Accordingly, efforts have been made to incorporate the vivid nursing experiences of COVID-19 into protocols against bracing for other diseases in the future.
That’s why even though I don’t know when the COVID-19 pandemic will end, once it’s over, I think the protocol needs to be more complete. Furthermore, I think we should regularly stockpile a certain amount of items for the future. And, we need to plan a little more neatly how to manage nursing staff systematically. (Participant K)
Since we don’t know when another infectious disease will afflict us, we have to prepare a lot for response training to infectious diseases, facilities and personnel of institutions, and locations for care facilities. To reduce certain mistakes, I think we should prepare well now. (Participant M)
This study was conducted to understand the meanings and essence of the experiences of nurses who cared for COVID-19 patients, using a descriptive phenomenological method. As a result of this study, 5 theme clusters and 12 themes were extracted.
The first theme cluster indicated that the nurses struggled under the weight of dealing with infectious diseases. Participants expressed anxiety and fear in the absence of a definitive treatment for COVID-19. This is similar to the results of previous studies that reported that the lack of information and knowledge about unfamiliar diseases leads to ambiguity in nursing services, resulting in nurses feeling fearful and anxious [ 33 ]. The anxiety and fear accompanying patient care may be the result of rushing to the battlefield without any preparation [ 19 ]. In addition, participants appeared to have persistent fears of unintentional exposure and of transmitting the virus to co-workers [ 34 ]. Nurses who performed shift work during COVID-19 had a significantly increased association between COVID-19-related work stressors and anxiety disorder [ 24 ]. These physiological and psychological conditions are reported to create high stress and further lead to post-traumatic stress [ 35 ]. Hence, nurses caring for COVID-19 patients require continuous evaluation and management to sustain their mental wellbeing.
In the COVID-19 pandemic, nurses are experiencing ethical anguish in the face of unique situations that they have never experienced before. In particular, watching patients pass away alone, in isolation, without the support and comfort of family members, causes unimaginable shock and anguish. Moral distress between patient dignity and infection control is a similar experience to nurses in other countries, reported in previous studies. Nurses are known to experience contradictory feelings [ 18 ] as they experience the pressure of having to coordinate their responsibilities for the prevention of COVID-19 infection, along with other moral responsibilities [ 16 ].
Therefore, we need to create an ethically supportive environment [ 36 ], not just alleviate the ethical distress experienced by nurses [ 37 ]. In addition, it is necessary to find ways to guarantee both infection control and dignified death; for instance, family members can wear protective clothing and safely participate in their relatives’ end-of-life processes. Other measures to ensure a dignified death include minimal post-mortem medical interference, and respect for and adherence to cultural customs [ 38 ].
The second theme cluster was participants’ aggravated caring difficulties. Participants in this study were uncomfortable with the heat and sweat caused by wearing sealed PPE. This seems to be a slightly different experience than the Italian nurses who raised some concerns about the lack of PPE, the inadequacy of PPE, and the lack of guidelines for proper use [ 15 ]. In Korea, where resources, such as PPE, were relatively abundant since the COVID-19 pandemic declaration, wearing PPE acted as a triple pain burden on the safety of all people rather than the problem of lack of equipment.
It is similar to a previous study, demonstrating that these devices make it difficult to communicate with patients and perform basic tasks [ 34 ]. The appropriate wearing of PPE has been reported to protect medical staff from burnout [ 39 ]. However, continuous wearing of PPE can cause tissue damage or skin reactions, and prolonged wearing of goggles has been found to increase discomfort and fatigue due to abrasive straps and visual distortion [ 38 ]. Therefore, compliance with the PPE-wearing guidelines should be monitored and shift work should be assigned, taking into account the maximum period during which nurses are allowed to wear protective equipment.
It has also been found that medical workload has been excessively delegated to nurses taking care of COVID-19 patients. Policies to minimize social contact with patients have burdened nurses with extra tasks, causing exhaustion [ 40 ]. The excessive increase in work burden is in line with the results of qualitative research on the experience of nurses in other countries. A study by Liu et al. [ 34 ], in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, reported that nurses had done a lot of work. Recent studies also reported that COVID-19 caused a lot of work for nurses [ 20 ], and the treatment characterized by many isolated patients increased the work of nurses exponentially [ 14 ]. Nurses are constantly aware of new knowledge and skills associated with evolving pandemics and viruses, and receive new training, in preparation for adapting to the situation and providing care for suspected or identified patients [ 20 ]. In addition, frequent changes of working locations and wards, changes in work schedules, and confusion over working guidelines, have made nurses’ lives uncertain.
The final theme of the challenge with difficult care was the confusing and uncertain working conditions, partly related to nursing staffing [ 14 ]. However, it was more difficult for the participants in this study to be able to predict their work schedule, rather than the shortage of nursing personnel. This may be due to the difficulty in predicting the hospitalization rates of infected patients and the problems caused by frequent and rapid relocation of nurses, depending on the number of hospitalized patients. In this study, the uncertainty in working conditions is consistent with the report by Liang et al. [ 20 ], that there was uncertainty among nurses about being transferred to the areas where the epidemic was most serious. Moreover, the ambiguity surrounding COVID-19 and whether patients have contracted it have been shown to increase nurses’ stress [ 33 ]. Even in such situations, thoroughly preparing for and predicting potential emergency situations, based on comprehensive data analysis, knowledge accumulation, and education, can reduce the uncertainty and anxiety surrounding infectious diseases.
The third theme cluster was double suffering from patient care. Despite continuing to monitor self-health to avoid infecting others, nurses contracted the virus or had to self-isolate due co-workers’ positive diagnoses. Sabetian et al. [ 41 ] found that 273 out of a total of 4854 cases contracted the virus while caring for COVID-19 patients, of which 51.3% were nurses. The fear of self-reliance approaching reality is a reflection of the situation at the time, when nurses were not allowed to return home after cohort isolation for two weeks as their colleagues were diagnosed with COVID-19 [ 19 ].
Notably, participants felt that they were subjected to dual perceptions, both as national heroes and as contagions. In Korea, the “Thank You Challenge” campaign encouraged expressing gratitude and respect to medical staff. The Korean people were deeply impressed by the situation of nurses and care protection, as they knew that they could not care for patients infected with COVID-19 without the sacrifice and compassionate mission of the nurses [ 42 ]. However, nurses have reported preferring forms of recognition and support other than hero worship [ 37 ], indicating that the campaign alone was insufficient in improving their morale. Participants also felt that their community members wanted to avoid them and considered them as dangerous contagions, threatening public safety. Previous studies reported that nurses were treated as viruses [ 19 ] or suffered from stigma [ 20 ], and conversely, were motivated to work harder through public support [ 19 ]. However, there are few research reports that nurses experience double suffering from patient care due to the coexistence of such contrasting perceptions. These experiences corroborate previous findings that disease uncertainty and social anxiety have caused nurses to be perceived as carriers and spreaders of the virus [ 33 ].
The fourth theme cluster was supporting caring. Participants endured their situations because quitting would have overburdened their colleagues. While participants found it awkward to work with nurses from different wards at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, their relationships improved and became encouraging and supportive [ 19 ]. It is worth noting that, even in situations of extreme stress and emotional exhaustion, support from colleagues and teams can positively impact recovery [ 43 ]. In addition, this study found that support and appreciation from patients and families encouraged participants to endure their difficult situations [ 19 , 35 ]. In previous studies, negative emotions, such as fatigue, helplessness, and fear of infections, prevailed in the early stages of COVID-19, but coping strategies were created with adaptation, support from others, and expressions of positive emotions [ 44 ]. International researchers reported that nurses dealt with and attempted to overcome their challenges and feelings and emotional responses by coping during the pandemic. Nurses in the United States [ 17 ] and India [ 45 ] used teamwork and peer support, and used personal coping strategies, such as relationship development, play, exercise, meditation, and distractions.
In the face of unknown diseases and unpredictable dangers, participants took responsibility and devoted themselves to their mission. Despite nurses and healthcare staff demonstrating professional devotion [ 33 , 34 ], a social atmosphere that demands sacrifice should be avoided to decrease their experiences of stress and fatigue.
The last theme cluster encompassed expectations for post-COVID-19 life. The participants had been doing their best to care for patients, while dreaming of returning to their regular lives, despite working in uncertain conditions. To instill a sense of normalcy in their lives, it is imperative to provide physical and mental health support to exhausted nurses. Even after the impact of COVID-19 has diminished, it is necessary to fully recognize the inherent stress and emotional burden experienced by nurses and support recovery with routine procedures and systems [ 44 ]. This aspect of the pandemic has been reported by Italian nurses to have obvious psychological trauma, which is quite similar to that reported in China [ 46 , 47 ]. As COVID-19 cases begin to decline, research into resilience, particularly post-traumatic stress syndrome in nursing staff, will be needed [ 48 ]. Although new epidemic outbreaks cannot be prevented, risk awareness can direct attention to emerging epidemics and promote capacity development toward disease management and control [ 19 , 49 ]. As seen from this study, experience alone did not prepare nursing staff to deal with novel disease outbreaks. Hence, specific protocols and standard operating procedures, targeting different disease risk scenarios, should be established to support nursing work, with ample resources.
In this study, we applied a phenomenological approach to understanding nurses’ experiences of COVID-19 patient caring, and the participants were the nurses who involuntarily cared for COVID-19 patients. Accordingly, there is a limitation in that the nursing experience of the nurses who voluntarily participated in COVID-19 patient nursing could not be presented. We conducted online or face-to-face interviews, depending on the participants’ preferences, but the online interview had limitations, in that it did not fully grasp the vivid experiences contained in the non-verbal expressions of the participants and did not describe their experiences in more depth. Participants were in a vulnerable situation; not only were they at risk of infection, but were also responsible for covering the duty of their colleagues with confirmed COVID-19, and the work of other health care assistants because they were wearing PPE. Despite these limitations, it is significant that this study gained a deeper understanding of nurses’ experiences of caring for COVID-19 patients and came a little closer to the essence of nursing.
This study is significant as it explored and organized nurses’ experiences of caring for COVID-19 patients, using a descriptive phenomenological research method. The findings of this study are useful primary data for developing appropriate measures for health professionals’ wellbeing during outbreaks of infectious diseases.
A limitation of this study is that, because data were collected before the participants were vaccinated against COVID-19, negative emotional aspects, such as anxiety and fear about caring for patients, were drawn as the main results. In the future, it is necessary to balance this perspective by incorporating experiences of healthcare providers who have been vaccinated against COVID-19. In addition, as nurses in this study struggled with mental as well as physical difficulties, it is suggested that future studies develop and apply mental health recovery programs for them.
H.-Y.J., J.-E.Y. and Y.-S.S. conceived and designed the study; H.-Y.J. acquired data; H.-Y.J. and Y.-S.S. analyzed the data; H.-Y.J. and J.-E.Y. wrote the first draft. All authors contributed to revisions of the manuscript and critical discussion. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research received no external funding.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hanyang University (HYUIRB-202009-009-1, 30 September 2021).
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
BMC Nursing volume 20 , Article number: 97 ( 2021 ) Cite this article
21k Accesses
7 Citations
1 Altmetric
Metrics details
Transitions in healthcare delivery, such as the rapidly growing numbers of older people and increasing social and healthcare needs, combined with nursing shortages has sparked renewed interest in differentiations in nursing staff and skill mix. Policy attempts to implement new competency frameworks and job profiles often fails for not serving existing nursing practices. This study is aimed to understand how licensed vocational nurses (VNs) and nurses with a Bachelor of Science degree (BNs) shape distinct nursing roles in daily practice.
A qualitative study was conducted in four wards (neurology, oncology, pneumatology and surgery) of a Dutch teaching hospital. Various ethnographic methods were used: shadowing nurses in daily practice (65h), observations and participation in relevant meetings (n=56), informal conversations (up to 15 h), 22 semi-structured interviews and member-checking with four focus groups (19 nurses in total). Data was analyzed using thematic analysis.
Hospital nurses developed new role distinctions in a series of small-change experiments, based on action and appraisal. Our findings show that: (1) this developmental approach incorporated the nurses’ invisible work; (2) nurses’ roles evolved through the accumulation of small changes that included embedding the new routines in organizational structures; (3) the experimental approach supported the professionalization of nurses, enabling them to translate national legislation into hospital policies and supporting the nurses’ (bottom-up) evolution of practices. The new roles required the special knowledge and skills of Bachelor-trained nurses to support healthcare quality improvement and connect the patients’ needs to organizational capacity.
Conducting small-change experiments, anchored by action and appraisal rather than by design , clarified the distinctions between vocational and Bachelor-trained nurses. The process stimulated personal leadership and boosted the responsibility nurses feel for their own development and the nursing profession in general. This study indicates that experimental nursing role development provides opportunities for nursing professionalization and gives nurses, managers and policymakers the opportunity of a ‘two-way-window’ in nursing role development, aligning policy initiatives with daily nursing practices.
Peer Review reports
The aging population and mounting social and healthcare needs are challenging both healthcare delivery and the financial sustainability of healthcare systems [ 1 , 2 ]. Nurses play an important role in facing these contemporary challenges [ 3 , 4 ]. However, nursing shortages increase the workload which, in turn, boosts resignation numbers of nurses [ 5 , 6 ]. Research shows that nurses resign because they feel undervalued and have insufficient control over their professional practice and organization [ 7 , 8 ]. This issue has sparked renewed interest in nursing role development [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. A role can be defined by the activities assumed by one person, based on knowledge, modulated by professional norms, a legislative framework, the scope of practice and a social system [ 12 , 9 ].
New nursing roles usually arise through task specialization [ 13 , 14 ] and the development of advanced nursing roles [ 15 , 16 ]. Increasing attention is drawn to role distinction within nursing teams by differentiating the staff and skill mix to meet the challenges of nursing shortages, quality of care and low job satisfaction [ 17 , 18 ]. The staff and skill mix include the roles of enrolled nurses, registered nurses, and nurse assistants [ 19 , 20 ]. Studies on differentiation in staff and skill mix reveal that several countries struggle with the composition of nursing teams [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].
Role distinctions between licensed vocational-trained nurses (VNs) and Bachelor of Science-trained nurses (BNs) has been heavily debated since the introduction of the higher nurse education in the early 1970s, not only in the Netherlands [ 24 , 25 ] but also in Australia [ 26 , 27 ], Singapore [ 20 ] and the United States of America [ 28 , 29 ]. Current debates have focused on the difficulty of designing distinct nursing roles. For example, Gardner et al., revealed that registered nursing roles are not well defined and that job profiles focus on direct patient care [ 30 ]. Even when distinct nursing roles are described, there are no proper guidelines on how these roles should be differentiated and integrated into daily practice. Although the value of differentiating nursing roles has been recognized, it is still not clear how this should be done or how new nursing roles should be embedded in daily nursing practice. Furthermore, the consequences of these roles on nursing work has been insufficiently investigated [ 31 ].
This study reports on a study of nursing teams developing new roles in daily nursing hospital practice. In 2010, the Dutch Ministry of Health announced a law amendment (the Individual Health Care Professions Act) to formalize the distinction between VNs and BNs. The law amendment made a distinction in responsibilities regarding complexity of care, coordination of care, and quality improvement. Professional roles are usually developed top-down at policy level, through competency frameworks and job profiles that are subsequently implemented in nursing practice. In the Dutch case, a national expert committee made two distinct job profiles [ 32 ]. Instead of prescribing role implementation, however, healthcare organizations were granted the opportunity to develop these new nursing roles in practice, aiming for a more practice-based approach to reforming the nursing workforce. This study investigates a Dutch teaching hospital that used an experimental development process in which the nurses developed role distinctions by ‘doing and appraising’. This iterative process evolved in small changes [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], based on nurses’ thorough knowledge of professional practices [ 37 ] and leadership role [ 38 , 39 , 40 ].
According to Abbott, the constitution of a new role is a competitive action, as it always leads to negotiation of new openings for one profession and/or degradation of adjacent professions [ 41 ]. Additionally, role differentiation requires negotiation between different professionals, which always takes place in the background of historical professionalization processes and vested interests resulting in power-related issues [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. Recent studies have described the differentiation of nursing roles to other professionals, such as nurse practitioners and nurse assistants, but have focused on evaluating shifts in nursing tasks and roles [ 31 ]. Limited research has been conducted on differentiating between the different roles of registered nurses and the involvement of nurses themselves in developing new nursing roles. An ethnographic study was conducted to shed light on the nurses’ work of seeking openings and negotiating roles and responsibilities and the consequences of role distinctions, against a background of historically shaped relationships and patterns.
The study aimed to understand the formulation of nursing role distinctions between different educational levels in a development process involving experimental action (doing) and appraisal.
We conducted an ethnographic case study. This design was commonly used in nursing studies in researching changing professional practices [ 45 , 46 ]. The researchers gained detailed insights into the nurses’ actions and into the finetuning of their new roles in daily practice, including the meanings, beliefs and values nurses give to their roles [ 47 , 48 ]. This study complied with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist.
Our study took place in a purposefully selected Dutch teaching hospital (481 beds, 2,600 employees including 800 nurses). Historically, nurses in Dutch hospitals have vocational training. The introduction of higher nursing education in 1972 prompted debates about distinguishing between vocational-trained nurses (VNs) and bachelor-trained nurses (BNs). For a long time, VNs resisted a role distinction, arguing that their work experience rendered them equally capable to take care of patients and deal with complex needs. As a result, VNs and BNs carry out the same duties and bear equal responsibility. To experiment with role distinctions in daily practice, the hospital management and project team selected a convenience but representative sample of wards. Two general (neurology and surgery) and two specific care (oncology and pneumatology) wards were selected as they represent the different compositions of nursing educational levels (VN, BN and additional specialized training). The demographic profile for the nursing teams is shown in Table 1 . The project team, comprising nursing policy staff, coaches and HR staff ( N = 7), supported the four (nursing) teams of the wards in their experimental development process (131 nurses; 32 % BNs and 68 % VNs, including seven senior nurses with an organizational role). We also studied the interactions between nurses and team managers ( N = 4), and the CEO ( N = 1) in the meetings.
Data was collected between July 2017 and January 2019. A broad selection of respondents was made based on the different roles they performed. Respondents were personally approached by the first author, after close consultation with the team managers. Four qualitative research methods were used iteratively combining collection and analysis, as is common in ethnographic studies [ 45 ] (see Table 2 ).
Shadowing nurses (i.e. observations and questioning nurses about their work) on shift (65 h in total) was conducted to observe behavior in detail in the nurses’ organizational and social setting [ 49 , 50 ], both in existing practices and in the messy fragmented process of developing distinct nursing roles. The notes taken during shadowing were worked up in thick descriptions [ 46 ].
Observation and participation in four types of meetings. The first and second authors attended: (1) kick-off meetings for the nursing teams ( n = 2); (2) bi-monthly meetings ( n = 10) between BNs and the project team to share experiences and reflect on the challenges, successes and failures; and (3) project group meetings at which the nursing role developmental processes was discussed ( n = 20). Additionally, the first author observed nurses in ward meetings discussing the nursing role distinctions in daily practice ( n = 15). Minutes and detailed notes also produced thick descriptions [ 51 ]. This fieldwork provided a clear understanding of the experimental development process and how the respondents made sense of the challenges/problems, the chosen solutions and the changes to their work routines and organizational structures. During the fieldwork, informal conversations took place with nurses, nursing managers, project group members and the CEO (app. 15 h), which enabled us to reflect on the daily experiences and thus gain in-depth insights into practices and their meanings. The notes taken during the conversations were also written up in the thick description reports, shortly after, to ensure data validity [ 52 ]. These were completed with organizational documents, such as policy documents, activity plans, communication bulletins, formal minutes and in-house presentations.
Semi-structured interviews lasting 60–90 min were held by the first author with 22 respondents: the CEO ( n = 1), middle managers ( n = 4), VNs ( n = 6), BNs ( n = 9, including four senior nurses), paramedics ( n = 2) using a predefined topic list based on the shadowing, observations and informal conversations findings. In the interviews, questions were asked about task distinctions, different stakeholder roles (i.e., nurses, managers, project group), experimental approach, and added value of the different roles and how they influence other roles. General open questions were asked, including: “How do you distinguish between tasks in daily practice?”. As the conversation proceeded, the researcher asked more specific questions about what role differentiation meant to the respondent and their opinions and feelings. For example: “what does differentiation mean for you as a professional?”, and “what does it mean for you daily work?”, and “what does role distinction mean for collaboration in your team?” The interviews were tape-recorded (with permission), transcribed verbatim and anonymized.
The fieldwork period ended with four focus groups held by the first author on each of the four nursing wards ( N = 19 nurses in total: nine BNs, eight VNs, and two senior nurses). The groups discussed the findings, such as (nurses’ perceptions on) the emergence of role distinctions, the consequences of these role distinctions for nursing, experimenting as a strategy, the elements of a supportive environment and leadership. Questions were discussed like: “which distinctions are made between VN and BN roles?”, and “what does it mean for VNs, BNs and senior nurses?”. During these meetings, statements were also used to provoke opinions and discussion, e.g., “The role of the manager in developing distinct nursing roles is…”. With permission, all focus groups were audio recorded and the recordings were transcribed verbatim. The focus groups also served for member-checking and enriched data collection, together with the reflection meetings, in which the researchers reflected with the leader and a member of the project group members on program, progress, roles of actors and project outcomes. Finally, the researchers shared a report of the findings with all participants to check the credibility of the analysis.
Data collection and inductive thematic analysis took place iteratively [ 45 , 53 ]. The first author coded the data (i.e. observation reports, interview and focus group transcripts), basing the codes on the research question and theoretical notions on nursing role development and distinctions. In the next step, the research team discussed the codes until consensus was reached. Next, the first author did the thematic coding, based on actions and interactions in the nursing teams, the organizational consequences of their experimental development process, and relevant opinions that steered the development of nurse role distinctions (see Additional file ). Iteratively, the research team developed preliminary findings, which were fed back to the respondents to validate our analysis and deepen our insights [ 54 ]. After the analysis of the additional data gained in these validating discussions, codes were organized and re-organized until we had a coherent view.
Ethnography acknowledges the influence of the researcher, whose own (expert) knowledge, beliefs and values form part of the research process [ 48 ]. The first author was involved in the teams and meetings as an observer-as-participant, to gain in-depth insight, but remained research-oriented [ 55 ]. The focus was on the study of nursing actions, routines and accounts, asking questions to obtain insights into underlying assumptions, which the whole research group discussed to prevent ‘going native’ [ 56 , 57 ]. Rigor was further ensured by triangulating the various data resources (i.e. participants and research methods), purposefully gathered over time to secure consistency of findings and until saturation on a specific topic was reached [ 54 ]. The meetings in which the researchers shared the preliminary findings enabled nurses to make explicit their understanding of what works and why, how they perceived the nursing role distinctions and their views on experimental development processes.
All participants received verbal and written information, ensuring that they understood the study goals and role of the researcher [ 48 ]. Participants were informed about their voluntary participation and their right to end their contribution to the study. All gave informed consent. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Erasmus Medical Ethical Assessment Committee in Rotterdam (MEC-2019-0215), which also assessed the compliance with GDPR.
Our findings reveal how nurses gradually shaped new nursing role distinctions in an experimental process of action and appraisal and how the new BN nursing roles became embedded in new nursing routines, organizational routines and structures. Three empirical appeared from the systematic coding: (1) distinction based on complexity of care; (2) organizing hospital care; and (3) evidence-based practices (EBP) in quality improvement work.
Initially, nurses distinguished the VN and BN roles based on the complexity of patient care, as stated in national job profiles [ 32 ]. BNs were supposed to take care of clinically complex patients, rather than VNs, although both VNs and BNs had been equally taking care of every patient category. To distinguish between highly and less complex patient care, nurses developed a complexity measurement tool. This tool enabled classification of the predictability of care, patient’s degree of self-reliance, care intensity, technical nursing procedures and involvement of other disciplines. However, in practice, BNs questioned the validity of assessing a patient’s care complexity, because the assessments of different nurses often led to different outcomes. Furthermore, allocating complex patient care to BNs impacted negatively on the nurses’ job satisfaction, organizational routines and ultimately the quality of care. VNs experienced the shift of complex patient care to BNs as a diminution of their professional expertise. They continuously stressed their competencies and questioned the assigned levels of complexity, aiming to prevent losses to their professional tasks:
‘Now we’re only allowed to take care of COPD patients and people with pneumonia, so no more young boys with a pneumothorax drain. Suddenly we are not allowed to do that. (…) So, your [professional] world is getting smaller. We don’t like that at all. So, we said: We used to be competent, so why aren’t we anymore?’ (Interview VN1, in-service trained nurse).
In discussing complexity of care, both VNs and BNs (re)discovered the competencies VNs possess in providing complex daily care. BNs acknowledged the contestability of the distinction between VN and BN roles related to patient care complexity, as the next quote shows:
‘Complexity, they always make such a fuss about it. (…) At a given moment you’re an expert in just one certain area; try then to stand out on your ward. (…) When I go to GE [gastroenterology] I think how complex care is in here! (…) But it’s also the other way around, when I’m the expert and know what to expect after an angioplasty, or a bypass, or a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (…) When I’ve mastered it, then I no longer think it’s complex, because I know what to expect!’ (Interview BN1, 19-07-2017).
This quote illustrates how complexity was shaped through clinical experience. What complex care is , is influenced by the years of doing nursing work and hence is individual and remains invisible. It is not formally valued [ 58 ] because it is not included in the BN-VN competency model. This caused dissatisfaction and feelings of demotion among VNs. The distinction in complexities of care was also problematic for BNs. Following the complexity tool, recently graduated BNs were supposed to look after highly complex patients. However, they often felt insecure and needed the support of more experienced (VN) colleagues – which the VNs perceived as a recognition of their added value and evidence of the failure of the complexity tool to guide division of tasks. Also, mundane issues like holidays, sickness or pregnancy leave further complicated the use of the complexity tool as a way of allocating patients, as it decreased flexibility in taking over and swapping shifts, causing dissatisfaction with the work schedule and leading to problems in the continuity of care during evening, night and weekend shifts. Hence, the complexity tool disturbed the flexibility in organizing the ward and held possible consequences for the quality and safety of care (e.g. inexperienced BNs providing complex care), Ultimately, the complexity tool upset traditional teamwork, in which nurses more implicitly complemented each other’s competencies and ability to ‘get the work done’ [ 59 ]. As a result, role distinction based on ‘quantifiable’ complexity of care was abolished. Attention shifted to the development of an organizational and quality-enhancing role, seeking to highlight the added value of BNs – which we will elaborate on in the next section.
Nurses increasingly fulfill a coordinating role in healthcare, making connections across occupational, departmental and organizational boundaries, and ‘mediating’ individual patient needs, which Allen describes as organizing work [ 49 ]. Attempting to make a valuable distinction between nursing roles, BNs adopted coordinating management tasks at the ward level, taking over this task from senior nurses and team managers. BNs sought to connect the coordinating management tasks with their clinical role and expertise. An example is bed management, which involves comparing a ward’s bed capacity with nursing staff capacity [ 1 , 60 ]. At first, BNs accompanied middle managers to the hospital bed review meeting to discuss and assess patient transfers. On the wards where this coordination task used to be assigned to senior nurses, the process of transferring this task to BNs was complicated. Senior nurses were reluctant to hand over coordinating tasks as this might undermine their position in the near future. Initially, BNs were hesitant to take over this task, but found a strategy to overcome their uncertainty. This is reflected in the next excerpt from fieldnotes:
Senior nurse: ‘First we have to figure out if it will work, don’t we? I mean, all three of us [middle manager, senior nurse, BN] can’t just turn up at the bed review meeting, can we? The BN has to know what to do first, otherwise she won’t be able to coordinate properly. We can’t just do it.’ BN: ‘I think we should keep things small, just start doing it, step by step. (…) If we don’t try it out, we don’t know if it works.’ (Field notes, 24-05-2018).
This excerpt shows that nurses gradually developed new roles as a series of matching tasks. Trying out and evaluating each step of development in the process overcame the uncertainty and discomfort all parties held [ 61 ]. Moreover, carrying out the new tasks made the role distinctions become apparent. The coordinating role in bed management, for instance, became increasingly embedded in the new BN nursing role. Experimenting with coordination allowed BNs prove their added value [ 62 ] and contributed to overall hospital performance as it combined daily working routines with their ability to manage bed occupancy, patient flow, staffing issues and workload. This was not an easy task. The next quote shows the complexity of creating room for this organizing role:
The BNs decide to let the VNs help coordinate the daily care, as some VNs want to do this task. One BN explains: ‘It’s very hard to say, you’re not allowed.’ The middle manager looks surprised and says that daily coordination is a chance to draw a clear distinction and further shape the role of BNs. The project group leader replies: ‘Being a BN means that you dare to make a difference [in distinctive roles]. We’re all newbies in this field, but we can use our shared knowledge. You can derive support from this task for your new role.’ (Field notes, 09-01-2018).
This excerpt reveals the BNs’ thinking on crafting their organizational role, turning down the VNs wishes to bear equal responsibility for coordinating tasks. Taking up this role touched on nurse identity as BNs had to overcome the delicate issue of equity [ 63 ], which has long been a core element of the Dutch nursing profession. Taking over an organization role caused discomfort among BNs, but at the same time provided legitimation for a role distinction.
Legitimation for this task was also gained from external sources, as the law amendment and the expert committee’s job descriptions both mentioned coordinating tasks. However, taking over coordinating tasks and having an organizing role in hospital care was not done as an ‘implementation’; rather it required a process of actively crafting and carving out this new role. We observed BNs choosing not to disclose that they were experimenting with taking over the coordinating tasks as they anticipated a lack of support from VNs:
BN: ‘We shouldn’t tell the VNs everything. We just need this time to give shape to our new role. And we all know who [of the colleagues] won’t agree with it. In my opinion, we’d be better off hinting at it at lunchtime, for example, to figure out what colleagues think about it. And then go on as usual.’ (Field notes, 12-06-2018).
BNs stayed ‘under the radar’, not talking explicitly about their fragile new role to protect the small coordination tasks they had already gained. By deliberately keeping the evaluation of their new task to themselves, they protected the transition they had set into motion. Thus, nurses collected small changes in their daily routines, developing a new role distinction step by step. Changes to single tasks accumulated in a new role distinction between BNs, VNs and senior nurses, and gave BNs a more hybrid nursing management role.
Quality improvement appeared to be another key concern in the development of the new BN role. Quality improvement work used to be carried out by groups of senior nurses, middle managers and quality advisory staff. Not involved in daily routines, the working group focused on nursing procedures (e.g. changing infusion system and wound treatment protocols). In taking on this new role BNs tried different ways of incorporating EBP in their routines, an aspect that had long been neglected in the Netherlands. As a first step, BNs rearranged the routines of the working group. For example, a team of BNs conducted a quality improvement investigation of a patient’s formal’s complaint:
Twenty-two patients registered a pain score of seven or higher and were still discharged. The question for BNs was: how and why did this bad care happen? The BNs used electronic patient record to study data on the relations between pain, medication and treatment. Their investigation concluded: nurses do not always follow the protocols for high pain scores. Their improvement plan covered standard medication policy, clinical lessons on pain management and revisions to the patient information folder. One BN said: ‘I really loved investigating this improvement.’ (Field notes, 28-05-2018).
This fieldnote shows the joy quality improvement work can bring. During interviews, nurses said that it had given them a better grip on the outcome of nursing work. BNs felt the need to enhance their quality improvement tasks with their EBP skills, e.g. using clinical reasoning in bedside teaching, formulating and answering research questions in clinical lessons and in multi-disciplinary patient rounds to render nursing work more evidence based. The BNs blended EBP-related education into shift handovers and ward meetings, to show VNs the value of doing EBP [ 64 ]. In doing so, they integrated and fostered an EBP infrastructure of care provision, reflecting a new sense of professionalism and responsibility for quality of care.
However, learning how to blend EPB quality work in daily routines – ‘learning in practice’ –requires attention and steering. Although the BNs had a Bachelor’s degree, they had no experience of a quality-enhancing role in hospital practice [ 65 ]. In our case, the interplay between team members’ previous education and experienced shortcomings in knowledge and skills uncovered the need for further EBP training. This training established the BNs’ role as quality improvers in daily work and at the same time supported the further professionalization of both BNs and VNs. Although introducing the EBP approach was initially restricted to the BNs, it was soon realized that VNs should be involved as well, as nursing is a collaborative endeavor [ 1 ], as one team member (the trainer) put it:
‘I think that collaboration between BNs and VNs would add lots of value, because both add something different to quality work. I’d suggest that BNs could introduce the process-oriented, theoretical scope, while VNs could maybe focus on the patients’ interest.’ (Fieldnote, informal conversation, 11-06-2018).
During reflection sessions on the ward level and in the project team meetings BNs, informed by their previous experience with the complexity tool, revealed that they found it a struggle to do justice to everyone’s competencies. They wanted to use everyone’s expertise to improve the quality of patient care. They were for VNs being involved in the quality work, e.g. in preparing a clinical lesson, conducting small surveys, asking VNs to pose EBP questions and encourage VNs to write down their thoughts on flip over charts as means of engaging all team members.
These findings show that applying EPB in quality improvement is a relational practice driven by mutual recognition of one another’s competencies. This relational practice blended the BNs’ theoretical competence in EBP [ 66 ] with the VNs’ practical approach to the improvement work they did together. As a result, the blend enhanced the quality of daily nursing work and thus improved the quality of patient care and the further professionalization of the whole nursing team.
This study aimed to understand how an experimental approach enables differently educated nurses to develop new, distinct professional roles. Our findings show that roles cannot be distinguished by complexity of care; VNs and BNs are both able to provide care to patients with complex healthcare needs based on their knowledge and experience. However, role distinctions can be made on organizing care and quality improvement. BNs have an important role organizing care, for example arranging the patient flow on and across wards at bed management meetings, while VNs contribute more to organizing at the individual patient level. BNs play a key role in starting and steering quality improvement work, especially blending EBP in with daily nursing tasks, while VNs are involved but not in the lead. Working together on quality improvement boosts nursing professionalization and team development.
Our findings also show that the role development process is greatly supported by a series of small-change experiments, based on action and appraisal. This experimental approach supported role development in three ways. First, it incorporates both formal tasks and the invisible, unconscious elements of nursing work [ 49 ]. Usually, invisible work gets no formal recognition, for example in policy documents [ 55 ], whereas it is crucial in daily routines and organizational structures [ 49 , 60 ]. Second, experimenting triggers an accumulation of small changes [ 33 , 35 ] leading to the embeddedness of role distinctions in new nursing routines, allowing nurses to influence the organization of care. This finding confirms the observations of Reay et al. that nurses can create small changes in daily activities to craft a new nursing role, based on their thorough knowledge of their own practice and that of the other involved professional groups [ 37 ]. Although these changes are accompanied by tension and uncertainty, the process of developing roles generates a certain joy. Third, experimenting stimulated nursing professionalization, enabling the nurses to translate national legislation into hospital policy and supporting the nurses’ own (bottom-up) evolution of practices. Historically, nursing professionalization is strongly influenced by gender and education level [ 43 ] resulting in a subordinate position, power inequity and lack of autonomy [ 44 ]. Giving nurses the lead in developing distinct roles enables them to ‘engage in acts of power’ and obtain more control over their work. Fourth, experimenting contributes to role definition and clarification. In line with Poitras et al. [ 12 ] we showed that identifying and differentiating daily nursing tasks led to the development of two distinct and complementary roles. We have also shown that the knowledge base of roles and tasks includes both previous and additional education, as well as nursing experience.
Our study contributes to the literature on the development of distinct nursing roles [ 9 , 10 , 11 ] by showing that delineating new roles in formal job descriptions is not enough. Evidence shows that this formal distinction led particularly to the non-recognition, non-use and degradation [ 41 ] of VN competencies and discomforted recently graduated BNs. The workplace-based experimental approach in the hospital includes negotiation between professionals, the adoption process of distinct roles and the way nurses handle formal policy boundaries stipulated by legislation, national job profiles, and hospital documents, leading to clear role distinctions. In addition to Hughes [ 42 ] and Abbott [ 67 ] who showed that the delineation of formal work boundaries does not fit the blurred professional practices or individual differences in the profession, we show how the experimental approach leads to the clarification and shape of distinct professional practices.
Thus, an important implication of our study is that the professionals concerned should be given a key role in creating change [ 37 , 39 , 40 ]. Adding to Mannix et al. [ 38 ], our study showed that BNs fulfill a leadership role, which allows them to build on their professional role and identity. Through the experiments, BNs and VNs filled the gap between what they had learned in formal education, and what they do in daily practice [ 64 , 65 ]. Experimenting integrates learning, appraising and doing much like going on ‘a journey with no fixed routes’ [ 34 , 68 ] and no fixed job description, resulting in the enlargement of their roles.
Our study suggests that role development should involve professionalization at different educational levels, highlighting and valuing specific roles rather than distinguishing higher and lower level skills and competencies. Further research is needed to investigate what experimenting can yield for nurses trained at different educational levels in the context of changing healthcare practices, and which interventions (e.g., in process planning, leadership, or ownership) are needed to keep the development of nursing roles moving ahead. Furthermore, more attention should be paid to how role distinction and role differentiation influence nurse capacity, quality of care (e.g., patient-centered care and patient satisfaction), and nurses’ job satisfaction.
Our study was conducted on four wards of one teaching hospital in the Netherlands. This might limit the potential of generalizing our findings to other contexts. However, the ethnographic nature of our study gave us unique understanding and in-depth knowledge of nurses’ role development and distinctions, both of which have broader relevance. As always in ethnographic studies, the chances of ‘going native’ were apparent, and we tried to prevent this with ongoing reflection in the research team. Also, the interpretation of research findings within the Dutch context of nurse professionalization contributed to a more in-depth understanding of how nursing roles develop, as well as the importance of involving nurses themselves in the development of these roles to foster and support professional development.
We focused on role distinctions between VNs and BNs and paid less attention to (the collaboration with) other professionals or management. Further research is needed to investigate how nursing role development takes place in a broader professional and managerial constellation and what the consequences are on role development and healthcare delivery.
This paper described how nurses crafted and shaped new roles with an experimental process. It revealed the implications of developing a distinct VN role and the possibility to enhance the BN role in coordination tasks and in steering and supporting EBP quality improvement work. Embedding the new roles in daily practice occurred through an accumulation of small changes. Anchored by action and appraisal rather than by design , the changes fostered by experiments have led to a distinction between BNs and VNs in the Netherlands. Furthermore, experimenting with nursing role development has also fostered the professionalization of nurses, encouraging nurses to translate knowledge into practice, educating the team and stimulating collaborative quality improvement activities.
This paper addressed the enduring challenge of developing distinct nursing roles at both the vocational and Bachelor’s educational level. It shows the importance of experimental nursing role development as it provides opportunities for the professionalization of nurses at different educational levels, valuing specific roles and tasks rather than distinguishing between higher and lower levels of skills and competencies. Besides, nurses, managers and policymakers can embrace the opportunity of a ‘two-way window’ in (nursing) role development, whereby distinct roles are outlined in general at policy levels, and finetuned in daily practice in a process of small experiments to determine the best way to collaborate in diverse contexts.
The data generated and analyzed during the current study is not publicly available to ensure data confidentiality but is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with the consent of the research participants.
Bachelor-trained nurse
Vocational-trained nurse
Evidence-based Practices
Allen D. Nursing and the future of ‘care’ in health care systems. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015;20(3):129–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819615577806 .
Article PubMed Google Scholar
NHS England. Leading change, adding value. A framework for nursing, midwifery and care staff. 2016. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/nursing-framework.pdf . Accessed 11 Nov 2020.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). The future of nursing; Leading change, advancing Health. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2011.
Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). Gloabal strategic directions for strengthening nursing and midwifery 2016–2020. Geneva: WHO Press; 2016.
Dawson AJ, Stasa H, Roche MA, et al. Nursing churn and turnover in Australian hospitals: nurses perceptions and suggestions for supportive strategies. BMC Nurs. 2014;13:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-13-11 .
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hayes LJ, O’Brien-Pallas L, Duffield C, et al. Nurse turnover: a literature review–an update. Intern J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(7):887–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.001 .
Article Google Scholar
Persson U, Carlson E. Conceptions of professional work in contemporary health care—Perspectives from registered nurses in somatic care: A phenomenographic study. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(1–2):201–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14628 .
Senek M, Robertson S, Ryan T, et al. Determinants of nurse job dissatisfaction-findings from a cross-sectional survey analysis in the UK. BMC Nurs. 2020;19(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00481-3 .
Jacob ER, McKenna L, D’Amore A. The changing skill mix in nursing: considerations for and against different levels of nurse. J Nurs Manag. 2015;23(4):421–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12162 .
Sermeus W, Aiken LH, Van den Heede K, et al. Nurse forecasting in Europe (RN4CAST): Rationale, design and methodology. BMC Nurs. 2011;10:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-10-6 .
de Bont A, van Exel Job, Coretti S, Ökem ZG, Janssen M, Hope KL, Ludwicki T, Zander B, Zvonickova M, Bond C, Wallenburg I. Reconfiguring health workforce: a case-based comparative study explaining the increasingly diverse professional roles in Europe. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1).
Poitras ME, Chouinard MC, Fortin M, et al. How to report professional practice in nursing? A scoping review. BMC Nurs. 2016;15(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0154-6 .
Jones ML. Role development and effective practice in specialist and advanced practice roles in acute hospital settings: systematic review and meta-synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2005;49(2):191–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03279.x .
Ranchal A, Jolley MJ, Keogh J, et al. The challenge of the standardization of nursing specializations in Europe. Int Nurs Rev. 2015;62(4):445–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12204 .
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lowe G, Plummer V, O’Brien AP, et al. Time to clarify–the value of advanced practice nursing roles in health care. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(3):677–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05790.x .
Fealy GM, Casey M, O’Leary DF, et al. Developing and sustaining specialist and advanced practice roles in nursing and midwifery: A discourse on enablers and barriers. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(19–20):3797–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14550 .
Aiken LH, Sermeus W, Van den Heede K, et al. Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States. BMJ. 2012;344;e1717. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e1717
Lu H, Zhao Y, While A. Job satisfaction among hospital nurses: A literature review. Intern J Nurs Stud. 2019;94:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.011 .
Duffield C, Roche M, Twigg D, et al. Adding unregulated nursing support workers to ward staffing: Exploration of a natural experiment. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(19–20):3768–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14632 .
Chua WL, Legido-Quigley H, Ng PY, et al. Seeing the whole picture in enrolled and registered nurses’ experiences in recognizing clinical deterioration in general ward patients: A qualitative study. Intern J Nurs Stud. 2019;95:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.012 .
van Oostveen CJ, Mathijssen E, Vermeulen H. Nurse staffing issues are just the tip of the iceberg: a qualitative study about nurses’ perceptions of nurse staffing. Intern J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(8):1300–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.04.002 .
Saville CE, Griffiths P, Ball JE, et al. How many nurses do we need? A review and discussion of operational research techniques applied to nurse staffing. Intern J Nurs Stud. 2019;97:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.015 .
Vatnøy TK, Sundlisæter Skinner M, Karlsen T, et al. Nursing competence in municipal in-patient acute care in Norway: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2020;9:70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00463-5 .
De Jong JHJ, Kerstens JAM, Sesink EM, et al. Deskundigheidsbevordering en professionalisering. In: Handboek verpleegkunde. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2003. p. 396–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-9699-3_13 .
Lalleman P, Stalpers D, Goossens L, et al. RN2Blend: meerjarig onderzoek naar gedifferentieerde inzet van verpleegkundigen. Verpleegkunde. 2020;1:4–6.
Endacott R, O’Connor M, Williams A, et al. Roles and functions of enrolled nurses in Australia: Perspectives of enrolled nurses and registered nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(5–6):e913–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13987 .
Jacob E, Sellick K, McKenna L. Australian registered and enrolled nurses: Is there a difference? Intern J Nurs Pract. 2012;18(3):303–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02037.x .
Matthias AD. Educational pathways for differentiated nursing practice: a continuing dilemma. In: Lewenson SB, McAllister A, Smith KM, editors. Nursing History for Contemporary Role Development. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2017. p. 121–40.
Boston-Fleischhauer C. Another Look at Differentiating Nursing Practice. J Nurs Adm. 2019;49(6):291–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000754 .
Gardner G, Duffield C, Doubrovsky A, et al. Identifying advanced practice: a national survey of a nursing workforce. Intern J Nurs Stud. 2016;55:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.12.001 .
Duffield C, Twigg D, Roche M, et al. Uncovering the disconnect between nursing workforce policy intentions, implementation, and outcomes: Lessons learned from the addition of a nursing assistant role. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2019;20(4):228–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154419877571
Terpstra D, Van den Berg A, Van Mierlo C, et al. Toekomstbestendige beroepen in de verpleging en verzorging: rapport stuurgroep over de beroepsprofielen en de overgangsregeling. 2015. http://www.nfu.nl/img/pdf/Rapport_toekomstbestendige-beroepen-in-de-verpleging-en-verzorging.pdf
Bohmer RM. The hard work of health care transformation. N Engl J Med 2016;375(8):709–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1606458
Ellström PE. Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects. Hum Res Dev Q. 2001;12(4):421–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1006 .
Lyman B, Hammond E, Cox J. Organizational learning in hospitals: A concept analysis. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27:633–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12722 .
van Schothorst J, van Roekel AM, Weggelaar-Jansen JWM, de Bont A, Wallenburg I. The balancing act of organizing professionals and managers: An ethnographic account of nursing role development and unfolding nurse-manager relationships. J Professions an Orga. 2020;7(3):283–99.
Reay T, Golden-Biddle K, Germann K. Legitimizing a New Role: Small Wins and Microprocesses of Change. Acad Manag J. 2006;49(5):977–98. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798178 .
Mannix J, Wilkes L, Jackson D. Marking out the clinical expert/clinical leader/clinical scholar: perspectives from nurses in the clinical arena. BMC Nurs. 2013:12;12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-12-12
Nelson-Brantley HV, Ford DJ. Leading change: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(4):834–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13223 .
Boamah SA. Emergence of informal clinical leadership as a catalyst for improving patient care quality and job satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(5):1000–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13895 .
Abbott A. Linked ecologies: States and universities as environments for professions. Sociol Theory. 2005;23(3):245–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00253.x .
Hughes D. Nursing and the division of labour: sociological perspectives. In: Allen D, Hughes D, editors. Nursing and the Division of Labour in Healthcare. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2017. p. 1–21.
Ayala RA. Towards a Sociology of Nursing. Palgrave Macmillan; 2020.
Chua WF, Clegg S. Professional closure. Theory Soc. 1990;19(2):135–72.
Roper JM, Shapira J. Ethnography in nursing research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2000.
Book Google Scholar
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice, 8th Edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/ Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
Atkinson P, Hammersley M. Ethnography: Principles in practice. New York: Routledge; 2007.
Draper J. Ethnography: Principles, practice and potential. Nurs Stand. 2015;29(36):36–41. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.36.36.e8937 .
Allen D. The invisible work of nurses: Hospitals, organisation and healthcare. The Invisible Work of Nurses: Hospitals, Organisation and Healthcare. Oxfordshire and New York: Routledge; 2014.
Lalleman P, Bouma J, Smid G, et al. Peer-to-peer shadowing as a technique for the development of nurse middle managers clinical leadership: An explorative study. Leader Health Serv. 2017;30(4):475–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-12-2016-0065 .
Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, et al. Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learned. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21
Houghton C, Casey D, Shaw D, et al. Rigour in qualitative case-study researh. Nurse Res. 2013;20(4):12–7. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.03.20.4.12.e326 .
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of Qualitative research. Thousands Oak: Sage; 2011.
Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Pract. 2000;39(3):124–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 .
Baker L, Observation. A complex research method. Library Trends. 2006;55(1):171–89.
Kanuha VK. “Being” native versus “going native”: Conducting social work research as an insider. Social Work. 2000;45(5):439–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/45.5.439 .
Dwyer SC, Buckle JL. The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. Intern J Qual Methods. 2009;8(1):54–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800105 .
Star SL, Strauss A. Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Comp Support Coop Work. 1999;8(1–2):9–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008651105359 .
Allen DA, Lyne PA. Nurses’ flexible working practices: some ethnographic insights into clinical effectiveness. Clin Effective Nurs. 1997;1(3):131–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9004(97)80048-9 .
Allen D. Translational mobilisation theory: a new paradigm for understanding the organisational elements of nursing work. Intern J Nurs Stud. 2018;79:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.010 .
Arrowsmith V, Lau-Walker M, Norman I, et al. Nurses’ perceptions and experiences of work role transitions: a mixed methods systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(8):1735–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12912 .
Apker J, Propp KM, Ford WSZ, et al. Collaboration, credibility, compassion, and coordination: professional nurse communication skill sets in health care team interactions. J Prof Nurs. 2006;22(3):180–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2006.03.002 .
Currie G, Koteyko N, Nerlich B. The dynamics of professions and development of new roles in public services organizations. The case of modern matrons in the English NHS. Public Adm. 2009;87(2):295–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01755.x .
Skela-Savič B, Hvalič-Touzery S, Pesjak K. Professional values and competencies as explanatory factors for the use of evidence-based practice in nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(8):1910–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13280 .
FURÅKER C. Registered Nurses’ views on their professional role. J Nurs Manag. 2008;16(8):933–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00872.x .
Stokke K, Olsen NR, Espehaug B, et al. Evidence based practice beliefs and implementation among nurses: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2014;13(1):8.
Abbott A. The system of professions: an essay on the expert division of labor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1988.
Clegg SR, Kornberger M, Rhodes C. Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization. 2005;12(2):147–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405051186 .
Download references
The authors would like to thank all participants for their contribution to this study.
The Reinier de Graaf hospital in Delft, who was central to this study provided financial support for this research.
Authors and affiliations.
Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Jannine van Schothorst–van Roekel, Anne Marie J.W.M. Weggelaar-Jansen, Carina C.G.J.M. Hilders, Antoinette A. De Bont & Iris Wallenburg
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
A.W. and I.W. developed the study design. J.S. and A.W. were responsible for data collection, enhanced by I.W. for data analysis and drafting the manuscript. C.H. and A.B. critically revised the paper. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Correspondence to Jannine van Schothorst–van Roekel .
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The research was approved by the Erasmus Medical Ethical Assessment Committee in Rotterdam (MEC-2019-0215) and all participants gave their informed consent.
Not applicable.
No competing interests has been declared by the authors.
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Additional file 1., rights and permissions.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
van Schothorst–van Roekel, J., Weggelaar-Jansen, A.M.J., Hilders, C.C. et al. Nurses in the lead: a qualitative study on the development of distinct nursing roles in daily nursing practice. BMC Nurs 20 , 97 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00613-3
Download citation
Received : 11 November 2020
Accepted : 19 May 2021
Published : 14 June 2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00613-3
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1472-6955
By the end of this article, you’ll have some innovative evidence-based practice nursing research topics for students to use.
Nursing research plays a crucial role in advancing healthcare by generating new knowledge and evidence-based practices that improve patient outcomes. Innovative nursing research is particularly important in addressing current healthcare challenges, such as the aging population, chronic disease management, healthcare disparities, and the COVID-19 pandemic. By conducting innovative nursing research, nurses can contribute to the development of new interventions, technologies, policies, and advocacy efforts that promote health and well-being for individuals, families, and communities.
Conducting nursing research has numerous benefits for nurses, patients, and the healthcare system as a whole. Nursing research can improve patient outcomes by identifying effective interventions and best practices by advancing nursing knowledge and practice. Additionally, nursing research contributes to evidence-based healthcare by providing a scientific basis for clinical decision-making and policy development. Furthermore, nursing research can enhance the professional development of nurses by promoting critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and lifelong learning.
Choosing the right nursing research topic is essential for conducting meaningful and impactful research. Nurses can identify gaps in current nursing knowledge by reviewing the literature and identifying areas where further research is needed. Additionally, nurses can consider current healthcare challenges and trends, such as the COVID-19 pandemic or healthcare disparities, when selecting a research topic. Finally, nurses should align their research topics with their personal expertise and experience to ensure that they are conducting feasible and relevant research.
A nursing research paper is a written document that presents the findings of a study or investigation conducted by nurses or other healthcare professionals. The purpose of writing a nursing research paper is to contribute to the body of knowledge in the field of nursing and to inform clinical practice. Nursing research papers can cover a wide range of topics, including patient care, healthcare systems, nursing education, and healthcare policy. They may use quantitative or qualitative research methods or a combination of both. The structure of a nursing research paper typically includes an introduction that outlines the research question or problem, a literature review that summarizes previous research on the topic, a methodology section that describes the study design and data collection methods, a results section that presents the findings of the study, and a discussion section that interprets the results and discusses their implications for nursing practice. Nursing research papers are important because they provide evidence-based information that can be used to improve patient care and healthcare outcomes. They also help to advance the field of nursing by identifying areas for further research and exploration. In a nutshell, nursing research papers are an essential component of evidence-based practice in nursing. They provide valuable insights into healthcare practices and contribute to the field’s ongoing development.
Here is a list of nursing research topics for healthcare students:
20 innovative nursing research paper topics for healthcare policy and advocacy.
Innovative Nursing research is essential for advancing healthcare by generating new knowledge, evidence-based practices, technologies, policies, and advocacy efforts that promote health and well-being for individuals, families, and communities worldwide. As such, it is crucial to encourage and support the next generation Of Nursing Researchers to drive innovation In Nursing Practice And Healthcare.
By providing opportunities for mentorship, funding, networking, And Professional Development Programs That Foster Critical Thinking And Problem-Solving Skills Among Nurses. We can inspire future generations Of Nurses To Conduct Meaningful And Impactful Research That Addresses Current Healthcare Challenges And Improves Patient Outcomes For Years To Come!
What is a nursing research topic.
A nursing paper research topic refers to a specific area of study within the nursing field that requires investigation and analysis. It focuses on exploring and addressing various aspects of nursing, such as patient care, healthcare practices, or nursing education.
When selecting a nursing research topic, you can start by identifying your areas of interest within the nursing field. Consider current healthcare issues, gaps in knowledge or practice, and the topic’s relevance to your nursing career goals. Consulting with your professors or experienced nurses can also provide valuable insights.
Some interesting nursing research topics include examining the Impact of technology on patient care, exploring cultural competency in nursing practice, investigating the Effectiveness of alternative therapies in pain management, or studying the long-term effects of shift work on nurses’ well-being.
A robust research question in nursing should be clear, specific, and relevant to your research topic. It should also be answerable through empirical research. Consider using the PICO(T) framework, which stands for Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time, to help structure your research question.
You can find research topics in nursing by exploring academic journals, attending nursing conferences, or accessing online databases specializing in nursing research. Additionally, discussing potential research ideas with your professors, colleagues, or nursing mentors can help you discover new and relevant topics.
Popular nursing research topics in the healthcare field include studying evidence-based practices in patient care, examining the Role of nurses in primary healthcare settings, investigating the Impact of nurse-patient ratios on quality of care, or exploring the Effectiveness of nursing interventions in preventing healthcare-associated infections.
Qualitative nursing research involves exploring phenomena, perceptions, or experiences through methods such as interviews, observations, or focus groups. On the other hand, quantitative nursing research focuses on numerical data and uses statistical analysis to draw research conclusions . Both approaches offer unique insights and can complement each other in research studies.
Examples of quantitative research topics in nursing can include “The Impact of Nurse-to-Patient Ratio on Fall Rates in Hospital Settings,” “The Effectiveness of a Diabetes Self-Management Program in Controlling Blood Sugar Levels,” or “Evaluating the Relationship Between Nurse Communication Skills and Patient Satisfaction.”
Nursing research topics are important as they contribute to the body of knowledge in the nursing profession. They help identify effective healthcare practices, improve patient outcomes, influence nursing education, provide evidence for policy-making, and enhance the overall quality of nursing care.
Nursing research is essential for the development of evidence-based practices that improve patient care and health outcomes. It enables nurses to provide high-quality care grounded in scientific evidence, contributing to the advancement of the nursing profession. Research findings can lead to better patient care protocols, enhanced healthcare policies, and innovative treatments. The purpose of this article is to provide a detailed guide for nursing students and professionals on how to write a nursing research paper . By following this guide, you will understand each step of the research process, from selecting a topic to presenting your findings.
Definition and types of nursing research.
Nursing research involves systematic investigation to develop knowledge about health, healthcare, and nursing practice. It includes various types such as qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods research. Qualitative research explores phenomena through detailed observation and interviews, while quantitative research involves numerical data and statistical analysis. Mixed-methods research combines both approaches.
Nursing research is significant because it provides the foundation for evidence-based practice. It helps nurses understand patient needs , improve care delivery, and address healthcare challenges. Research also informs policy decisions and contributes to the professional development of nurses by enhancing critical thinking and analytical skills.
Common research methods in nursing include surveys, experiments, observational studies, and case studies. Surveys gather data from large groups of people, experiments test hypotheses in controlled environments, observational studies explore behaviors and outcomes in natural settings, and case studies provide in-depth analysis of individual or group experiences.
Identifying areas of interest.
Begin by identifying areas within nursing that spark your curiosity or passion. Consider your clinical experiences, coursework, and current healthcare issues. Reflect on what aspects of nursing you find most intriguing or where you believe there is a need for more research.
Conduct a preliminary review of existing literature to understand what research has already been done in your area of interest. This will help you identify gaps in knowledge and avoid duplicating previous studies. Use databases like PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar to find relevant articles and journals.
After reviewing the literature, narrow down your topic to a specific research question or hypothesis. Ensure your topic is manageable within the scope of your research capabilities, resources, and time constraints. A focused topic will make your research more effective and easier to conduct.
Formulate clear and concise research questions or hypotheses. These should guide your study and provide a framework for your research design. For example, a research question might be, “What is the impact of nurse-led patient education on medication adherence in diabetic patients?”
Purpose of the literature review.
The literature review serves several purposes: it provides context for your research, identifies gaps in existing knowledge, and demonstrates your understanding of the topic. It helps to justify your research by showing the need for further investigation.
Search for literature using academic databases, journals, and other credible sources. Use keywords related to your research topic to find relevant studies. Review abstracts and titles to quickly determine the relevance of each source before delving into full-text articles.
Evaluate the quality and credibility of your sources. Consider the publication date, the reputation of the journal, the qualifications of the authors, and the methodology used in the studies. Prioritize recent and peer-reviewed articles to ensure your literature review is current and reliable.
Organize your literature review by grouping studies with similar themes, methodologies , or findings. Use headings and subheadings to structure your review logically. Summarize each study and highlight its relevance to your research question.
Identify gaps in the literature where further research is needed. These gaps can provide a rationale for your study and help you refine your research questions. Highlighting these gaps will also demonstrate the originality and necessity of your research.
Selecting an appropriate research design.
Choose a research design that best suits your research question and objectives. Common designs in nursing research include descriptive, correlational, experimental, and quasi-experimental designs. Your choice will depend on the nature of your research question and the type of data you plan to collect.
Decide on a sampling method to select participants for your study. Common sampling methods include random sampling, convenience sampling, and purposive sampling. Consider factors such as sample size, representativeness, and ethical considerations when selecting your sample.
Quantitative methods.
Quantitative methods involve the collection of numerical data. This can include surveys, questionnaires, and structured observations. Ensure your data collection tools are valid and reliable to produce accurate results.
Qualitative methods involve collecting non-numerical data, such as interviews, focus groups, and open-ended surveys. These methods allow for a deeper understanding of participants’ experiences and perspectives.
Ethical considerations are crucial in nursing research. Obtain informed consent from participants, ensure confidentiality, and minimize any potential harm. Follow guidelines set by institutional review boards (IRBs) and professional organizations to maintain ethical standards.
Structuring the proposal.
Your research proposal should be well-structured and include the following sections:
The introduction should provide background information on your research topic, state the research problem, and explain the significance of the study. Clearly outline your research questions or hypotheses.
Summarize the key findings from your literature review , highlighting the gaps your research aims to fill. Discuss the theoretical framework or models that underpin your study.
Detail your research design, sampling methods, data collection procedures, and data analysis plan. Justify your choices and explain how they align with your research questions.
Study design.
Describe the overall design of your study, including whether it is qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods. Explain why this design is appropriate for your research question.
Provide details about your sampling strategy, including the criteria for selecting participants, the sample size, and any potential biases. Describe how you will recruit and obtain consent from participants.
Outline the procedures for collecting data, including the tools and techniques you will use. Specify the timeline for data collection and any logistical considerations.
Prepare a budget that outlines the costs associated with your research, such as materials, travel, and participant incentives. Create a timeline that includes key milestones and deadlines for each stage of the research process.
Identify potential challenges and limitations of your study. Discuss how you will address these challenges and mitigate any risks to the success of your research.
Data collection process.
Implement your data collection plan according to the methods and procedures outlined in your proposal. Ensure that all data is collected systematically and ethically.
Maintain the quality and integrity of your data by following standardized procedures, double-checking data entries, and keeping detailed records. Address any discrepancies or issues promptly.
Manage the logistics of your research, including scheduling, communication with participants, and data storage. Stay organized and adhere to your timeline to keep the research process on track.
Data preparation and cleaning.
Prepare your data for analysis by organizing and cleaning it. This may involve coding qualitative data, checking for missing values, and ensuring consistency in your data set.
Select analysis methods that align with your research design and questions. For quantitative data, this may include statistical tests such as t-tests, ANOVAs, or regression analysis . For qualitative data, consider thematic analysis or content analysis.
Interpret your results in the context of your research questions and hypotheses. Discuss whether your findings support or refute your hypotheses and how they contribute to the existing body of knowledge.
Use statistical software, such as SPSS , SAS, or NVivo, to assist with data analysis. These tools can help you manage and analyze large data sets efficiently and accurately.
Structuring the paper, title and abstract.
Create a clear and concise title that reflects the main focus of your research. Write an abstract that summarizes the purpose, methods, results, and conclusions of your study.
The introduction should provide background information, state the research problem, and outline the significance of the study. Clearly articulate your research questions or hypotheses.
Describe the research design , sampling methods, data collection procedures, and analysis techniques used in your study.
Present your findings in a clear and logical manner. Use tables, graphs, and charts to illustrate key results. Avoid interpreting the results in this section.
Interpret your findings in the context of your research questions and the existing literature. Discuss the implications of your results, any limitations of your study, and suggestions for future research .
Summarize the main findings of your study and their significance. Highlight the contributions of your research to the nursing field and suggest areas for further investigation.
Ensure that your paper is clear, cohesive, and logically organized. Use headings and subheadings to guide the reader through each section. Write in a concise and professional manner, avoiding jargon and complex language.
Use appropriate referencing and citation styles, such as APA , MLA, or Chicago, as required by your institution or publisher. Cite all sources accurately to give credit to original authors and avoid plagiarism.
Thoroughly proofread and edit your paper to eliminate errors and improve clarity. Consider seeking feedback from peers or mentors to ensure your paper is polished and professional.
The impact of nurse-led patient education on medication adherence in diabetic patients.
Diabetes is a chronic condition that requires continuous management to prevent complications. Medication adherence is critical for effective diabetes management, yet many patients struggle to consistently take their prescribed medications. Poor adherence can lead to adverse health outcomes, increased hospitalizations, and higher healthcare costs.
Despite the known importance of medication adherence, a significant number of diabetic patients fail to adhere to their medication regimen. This research aims to investigate the impact of nurse-led patient education on improving medication adherence in diabetic patients.
This study will provide insights into the effectiveness of nurse-led education programs in promoting better health outcomes for diabetic patients. The findings could inform healthcare practices and policies, leading to improved patient care and reduced healthcare costs.
The literature review will summarize existing research on medication adherence in diabetic patients and the role of nurse-led education programs.
Studies have shown that medication adherence rates among diabetic patients are suboptimal, with many patients missing doses or not following prescribed regimens.
Nurse-led education programs have been implemented in various healthcare settings to improve patient knowledge, self-management skills, and adherence to treatment plans. These programs often include personalized education sessions, follow-up support, and motivational interviewing.
While previous studies have explored the general impact of education on medication adherence, there is limited research specifically focused on nurse-led education programs for diabetic patients. Additionally, factors influencing the success of these programs need further investigation.
This study will employ a quasi-experimental design with a control group and an intervention group. The intervention group will receive nurse-led education, while the control group will receive standard care .
Participants will be recruited from a primary care clinic. The sample will include 100 diabetic patients aged 18 and older who are currently prescribed medication for diabetes management.
Convenience sampling will be used to select participants who meet the inclusion criteria.
The nurse-led education program will consist of five weekly sessions covering topics such as medication management, lifestyle modifications , and the importance of adherence. Each session will be tailored to individual patient needs.
The control group will receive standard care, which includes routine consultations and printed educational materials.
Medication adherence measurement.
Medication adherence will be measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), a validated self-report questionnaire.
Demographic information (age, gender, education level) and clinical data (HbA1c levels, duration of diabetes) will be collected from medical records .
Statistical methods.
Descriptive statistics will summarize participant characteristics. Independent t-tests and chi-square tests will compare medication adherence between the intervention and control groups. Multiple regression analysis will identify factors influencing adherence.
Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS software.
Informed consent.
Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. They will be informed about the study’s purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits.
Participant confidentiality will be maintained by assigning unique identifiers and storing data securely.
Potential challenges include participant dropout, variability in patient engagement, and time constraints for both patients and researchers.
To address these challenges, we will:
This research proposal outlines a study designed to evaluate the impact of nurse-led patient education on medication adherence in diabetic patients. By addressing a critical gap in the literature, this study aims to contribute valuable insights into nursing practice and patient care. The findings have the potential to improve health outcomes for diabetic patients and inform future educational interventions in the nursing field.
Writing a nursing research paper involves several critical steps, including choosing a topic, conducting a literature review, designing the study, writing the proposal, conducting the research, analyzing data, and writing the final paper. Each step requires careful planning and attention to detail. Engage in nursing research to contribute to the advancement of healthcare and improve patient outcomes . Your efforts can lead to meaningful discoveries and innovations in nursing practice.
Embark on your research journey with confidence, knowing that your work has the potential to make a significant impact. For professional assistance with academic writing, consider our expert writing services to help you achieve your research goals.
A Page will cost you $12, however, this varies with your deadline.
We have a team of expert nursing writers ready to help with your nursing assignments. They will save you time, and improve your grades.
Whatever your goals are, expect plagiarism-free works, on-time delivery, and 24/7 support from us.
Here is your 15% off to get started. Simply:
All the Best,
Previous post.
COMMENTS
Sample APA Paper. This guide has has been put together by the State College of Florida BSN Faculty for the Nursing Department. It can be used as a template. It does show appropriate APA set-up for a paper. Models the following: Title Page; Margins; Font; Running Head; Abstract; References
A list of the best nursing research topics for students with tips on writing nursing research, choosing a topic, and more.
Here’s a guide on writing a nursing research proposal and nursing research proposal topics, DNP research proposal topics, current nursing research proposal topics, and nursing research examples.
Exploring all aspects of nursing research, training, education, and practice, BMC Nursing is a well-established open access peer-reviewed journal. Rapid ...
Nurses and nursing students write research papers to share their insights as they learn more about nursing processes and practices. Nursing research papers are used to: document research, organize information, advance nursing scholarship, and improve the writing skills of nurses.
Five theme clusters emerged from the analysis: (1) nurses struggling under the weight of dealing with infectious disease, (2) challenges added to difficult caring, (3) double suffering from patient care, (4) support for caring, and (5) expectations for post-COVID-19 life.
Journal of Research in Nursing publishes quality research papers on healthcare issues that inform nurses and other healthcare professionals globally through linking policy, research and development initiatives to clinical and academic excellence. View full journal description.
Our findings reveal how nurses gradually shaped new nursing role distinctions in an experimental process of action and appraisal and how the new BN nursing roles became embedded in new nursing routines, organizational routines and structures.
A nursing paper research topic refers to a specific area of study within the nursing field that requires investigation and analysis. It focuses on exploring and addressing various aspects of nursing, such as patient care, healthcare practices, or nursing education.
Writing a nursing research paper involves several critical steps, including choosing a topic, conducting a literature review, designing the study, writing the proposal, conducting the research, analyzing data, and writing the final paper.